HDATE feature with quota generation

Hi:
Currently, I am referencing date type 'SD' in IT0041 using feature HDATE (determining entry date) for calculating seniority in generating absence quotas. A customer is requesting a new date type, 'AL', to be created and we begin generating their absence quotas based off the 'AL' date type in IT0041.
If I change the HDATE feature to begin referencing the 'AL' date type instead of the 'SD', will this affect the existing absence quotas that have already been generated off the 'SD'? For example, if a master data change triggers a retro time evaluation and the HDATE feature is reading the 'AL' now, will the absence quotas be affected?
Regards,
Brian Hoffman

Hi Venkat,
thanks for your answer. I can run the time evaluation to the end of the (12/31/2008) because I haven´t time events for all the year previosuly.
I need to generate with RPTQTA00 a entitlement for all the year,30 hours,("No generate" selected in V_556A_B ). After that,on certain fridays I have to discount 2 hours of this entitlement with time evaluation (Increase or replace in V_556A_B,and use then Quota and UPDTQ).
Like you will see I need to modify V_556A_B selections to do it,is there any other way??....Thanks!!!!!!

Similar Messages

Issue with PTO (Paid Time Off) quota generation

Hi All,
We have an issue with quota generation of PTO for our employees.
The issue goes like this:
We have a Paid time off for employees 5weeks( 200 hrs) for employees who have worked less than 5 years.
we have paid time off for employees 6 weeks ( 240 hrs) for employees who have worked more than 5 years.
we have the following logic that has to go in this config:
-- Our fiscal year starts on Feb 1st and ends on Jan end or Feb starts which has a full week of working days. ( ex: if 01/31/2012 falls on a Thursday the following Monday which has full 5 day working week would be the end of the fiscal year).
-- Depending on the working hours of the employees and the date of joining for the first year ( for new hires)0041 info type the eligibility gets varied and reduced. Ex( employees who joins on start of fiscal year and works 40hrs per week schedules is eligible for 200hrs of PTO. Employees who join in the month of august and works for 35 hrs per week ( i.e mid of fiscal year) would get 91 hrs of PTO.
I need to put this in the system. I am thinking this could be done with out tweaking PCR.I need help in configuring this in Absence quotas as to what are the things i need change in system config and how do i do it. Please help with some screen shots if possible. I really need this to get it done ASAP. Looking forward for help.
Thanks,
Chowdary.

We use TM00 schema. Can i call TS15 and TS 12 rules into TM00 acheieve my issue of quota entilements?
Iam doing this because my businees needs to see if an employee chages his work schedule from 40 to 30 or 20 etc.. the PTO has to vary accordingly.
As the minimum eligibility is to work for 20 hrs to avail the PTO days. If at any point the employee drops it under 20 he will not be eligible till he work any this >= 20hrs per month so the evaluation has to check periodically to update the quota availability.... I need help plz suggest ...

Absence quota generation with PCR in Time Evaluation

Dear All,
I am generation absence quota Annual leave = 50 through PT60- ZM04. Its daily calculation and transfered at the month end.
The quota entitlement is 30 days per year.
I have written this pcr. Have configured a time type too. but not sure why its not generating any quota.
The time type I have configured is:
Time Type: 0097
Save as day balance - No Formation
Save as period balance - 1
Store for time accounts - 1
Have assigned the time type 0097 in Base entitlement for Absence quota generation as Day Balance and even in generation rules.
Have placed the PCR with ACTIO Z003 before CUMBT fucntion.
The PCR Z003 is:
000010 D HRS?0
000020 *
000030 = D OUTAQTYP
000040 = **
000050 = 50 Z GCY ZQTY
PCR ZQTY is:
000010 D OUTWPMOLGA
000020 **
000030 99 HRS=FR50C ADDDB0097Z ADDDB0097 HRS=D0097
I didnt mention anywhere in configuration or PCR that its 30 days per year.
Do I need to do this?
Have I missed out anything, please help me.
Thanks & regards,
Majid

Hi,
This you can do through config also without using PCR.
Base entitlement is 30 for calender year. Selection rule- Accrual period is daily and transfer time is time evaluation period.
Use appropriate rounding rule in selection rule.
Rgds,
Lata

TS3474 I purchaed the earpods with mic & controls and they don't work with 6th generation nano. Are the features supposed to be compatible with this model of nano?

I purchased the earpods with mic & controls and the features don't work with 6th generation nano--is this normal?

Hi there,
According to the product page:
The remote and mic are supported by all models of iPod, iPhone, and iPad (not all models support volume up/down functions). Audio is supported by all iPod models.
Your iPod Nano may be one of the models that does not support the volume up/down function. Take a look at the page below for more information.
Apple EarPods with Remote and Mic
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD827LL/A/apple-earpods-with-remote-and-mic
-Griff

Compensatory quota generation

Dear Experts,
Can anybody help me out with Compensatory quota generation concept?what is the main purpose...?
Employee working on weekly off and holidays, are eligible for compensatory off.?Then how compensatory quota generation take place in negative time management if there is no time recording ?how it will update for each financial year?
What are the config steps required or there are standard reports...or program?
Please help.....
Advance thanks in ton
Regards,
Nidhi
Edited by: Nidhi Priya on Aug 14, 2011 5:09 PM

Hi,
If you are not using time evaluation then it is not possible to generate COFF, how will the system know weather the employee is at work or not?
Best wishes
Raghu

Quota generation in IT2006

Hello Experts.
need your help in this issue, i am running time evaluation with schema ZM00 where annual leave quota is generated with TE.
my problem here is that the quota is being generated on a monthly basis with 1.25 day/month and it is showing in the "Accrual Information" in the Time Management Pool in PT40, but when displaying the quota in IT2006, the add up of the quota generation is different.
please advise.
thank you

Hi,
TE is running on a daily basis.
my problem is that the Accrual entitlements are being generated correctly but they are not adjusting the IT2006.
what would prevent the accrual entitlements from being automatically updated in IT2006. I checked the the following date in SPRO and it is correct:
Time Management- Time Data Recording and Administration- Managing Time Accounts Using Attendance/Absence Quotas- Calculating Absence Entitlements-- Automatic Accrual of Absence Quotas--- Permit Generation of Quotas in Time Evaluation
please your help is very appreciated because it is urgent.
thank you.

Issue in Absence Quota generation wrt to actions (IT0000);using schema TQTA

Hi
I wanted some clarification on Absence Quota generation through schema-u201CTQTAu201D
The client Scenario is that they want Earned leaves (absence Quota type 0002 and 0003) and Half-Pay leave (Absence Quota 0004) semi-annually.
Whenever an action is run (whether with employee status active or inactive) the absence quota is generated twice:
1.     Last day of previous action
2.     Last day of evaluation period.
Main issue is that when it is reflected in IT-2006 it is summing up the quota generated on both the above said dates.
Also the quota that is generated on the last day of the evaluation period is not prorated but for the entire accrual period.
When the employment status of an action is inactive; the quota is generated upto the last date of previous active action, but if any other action is executed with employee status as u201Cactiveu201D in the same accrual period and time evaluation is run; the quota gets generated again on the last date of accrual period for the entire accrual period i.e. the inactive period is also taken into consideration. Moreover, both the quota generated are added up and displayed in IT-2006.
Kindly advice me the solution for the same.
Thanks and Regards
Parul Jain

Hi
I wanted some clarification on Absence Quota generation through schema-u201CTQTAu201D
The client Scenario is that they want Earned leaves (absence Quota type 0002 and 0003) and Half-Pay leave (Absence Quota 0004) semi-annually.
Whenever an action is run (whether with employee status active or inactive) the absence quota is generated twice:
1.     Last day of previous action
2.     Last day of evaluation period.
Main issue is that when it is reflected in IT-2006 it is summing up the quota generated on both the above said dates.
Also the quota that is generated on the last day of the evaluation period is not prorated but for the entire accrual period.
When the employment status of an action is inactive; the quota is generated upto the last date of previous active action, but if any other action is executed with employee status as u201Cactiveu201D in the same accrual period and time evaluation is run; the quota gets generated again on the last date of accrual period for the entire accrual period i.e. the inactive period is also taken into consideration. Moreover, both the quota generated are added up and displayed in IT-2006.
Kindly advice me the solution for the same.
Thanks and Regards
Parul Jain

HT4972 Is the update compatible with 3rd Generation Ipod Touch

Hello Im JS.Is the update compatible with 3rd Generation Ipod Touch. Thank You have a nice day.

What update?
iOS 5 is compatible with a 3G (as well as 4G) iPod. However, if you are stuck with 4.2.1 that indicates that you really have a 2G iPod. those can only go to 4.1.2. See:
Identifying iPod models
iPod touch (3rd generation)
iPod touch (3rd generation) features a 3.5-inch (diagonal) widescreen multi-touch display and 32 GB or 64 GB flash drive. You can browse the web with Safari and watch YouTube videos with Wi-Fi. You can also search, preview, and buy songs from the iTunes Wi-Fi Music Store on iPod touch.
The iPod touch (3rd generation) can be distinguished from iPod touch (2nd generation) by looking at the back of the device. In the text below the engraving, look for the model number. iPod touch (2nd generation) is model A1288, and iPod touch (3rd generation) is model A1318.

I have ipod nano with 7 generation and I would buy a Polar Wearlink Transmitter Nike Plus to view heart beats . Is this product compatible with nano?

I have ipod nano with 7 generation and I would buy a Polar Wearlink + Transmitter Nike+ Plus to view heart beats . Is this product compatible with nano?

I have the same issue! I purchased a nano 6th, polar hrm so I could run and receive spoken feedback when my heart rate was outside my preset zone. My suunto t3 used to beep when outside the preset zones. Automatic, periodic beeps or spoken feedback is the most important information to receive during exercise. I hope apple can update the software to add this simple yet critical feature.

I have a late 2011 model MacBook Pro running Mountain Lion. I love the AirPlay mirroring feature with Apple TV...BUT, how do I mirror with TVs that don't have Apple TV? I used to run a cable from my mini display port to the HDMI input of a TV.

I have a late 2011 model MacBook Pro running Mountain Lion. I love the AirPlay mirroring feature with Apple TV...BUT, how do I mirror with TVs that don't have Apple TV? I used to run a cable from my mini display port to the HDMI input of a TV. This feature seems to be lost in the Mountain Lion upgrade. Did Apple feel that once Mountain Lion came out that EVERYONE would have Apple TV? There are no settings in System Preferences/Display like there used to be...only for AirPlay Mirroring.

Running a cable to the HDMI port is still supported. (and still works on mine).
If the Arrangement tab in System Preferences > Displays isn't present then it doesn't recognize the physical connection. Double check all cables. If that doesn't work try a PRAM reset:
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1379

LabVIEW VI with Report Generation Toolkit elements in a TestStand sequence does not run with a LabVIEW 8.5 Run-Time Engine

Hi all,
I am using LabVIEW 8.5.1 and TestStand 4.1. I have done a TestStand sequence with a VI in it, which uses Report Generation Toolkit elements. On my machine I am using LabVIEW and TestStand with a Development System license. On the other machine I am using TestStand with a Base Deployment license and I have chosen the LabVIEW 8.5 Run-Time Engine in the Adapter Configuration. Everything is running well except of this VI with Report Generation Toolkit elements. The error message is showing that the VI is not executable. It works well only after I have installed LabVIEW with an Evaluation license and chosen LabVIEW 8.5 Development System in the Adapter Configuration.
I have found other posts and a document in the KnowledgeBase with a similar problem: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/8A0E6274D9BD7B1986256F62006AD402?OpenDocument But I am not using EXE files in my sequence, so I don't know how to solve mine. Anybody has an idea?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hello guys,
thank you very much for your answers!
@Ruediger:
I tried to follow the instruction for Method 2 in the mentioned document: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/F3DC40A6E3F3B25B862570AD005D1D3D?OpenDocument, but the steps on my machine are different starting from step 4. After I click "Continue..." in step 3, I dont get a window, the system just makes a new folder with the same VI.
To be honest, I am new to LabVIEW and have some difficulties at this time. What I understood from your reply is, that I need to make a LLB-File, where the files from Report Generation Toolkit are in!?
@GovBob:
I was following the instruction in the document: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/9E00E7EFE0635E678625734600779EFE, but it wasnt working. Can you please tell me how I can check if the VI Server is installed and running on the machine?
I am using LabVIEW 8.5.1 and TestStand 4.1 on my machine, on the deploy machine there is TestStand 4.1.1. The version of my Report Generation Toolkit is 1.1.2.
Kind regards, Roman

Error -2146827284 with report generation 1.1.4

Hi. Im working with Report Generation 1.1.4 and I was testing it for exporting data to an excel book. I was making some vi's to learn how to use it and do what I need it for. I need to take two non constant numeric values and save them in an excel table of two columns and graph them. The error comes when I transpose the original matrix, so i can have 2 columns instead of 2 rows in excel. In the picture you can also see that no graph is displayed. If anyone knows has experience doing this kind of activities between labview and excel I would appreciate some help! Thanks!
Attachments:
2 columns table xcel report generation test.vi ‏11 KB
test.JPG ‏165 KB

Why are you turning your array into a matrix? A matrix is not the same thing as an array. (They are related, but are not truly the same thing.)
Turn on context help and read about all the inputs into the charting function. You want to have a 2-D array. You are actually only starting off with a 1-D array. (Which you can't transpose if you wanted to because it is only 1 dimensional). Create a 2-D array of data to feed into the charting function. If you need to transpose that you can. Don't play with matrix transformations, they are rarely used and only for special math operations when they are. Wire up any other inputs to the charting function as needed. The default chart type is xlColumnClustered which I am going to guess is not truly the graph you want. You probably want an XYscatter.

Proformance issue with 'sid generation on activation'

Hi Gurus,
In our BW(NW 2004) system we are using Cognos as reporting tool, due to process chain failure at DSO level we unchecked 'sid generation on activation' and chain running successfully after that.
unchecking will be a performance issue due to generating sid's at run time as per SAP.
My question is as i am using Cognos in place of BEX. what are the possiblities of effecting the performance and alll?
Please provide your valuable suggestions.
Thanks in Advance,
Suresh.

Hi Suresh,
Irrespective of what is the reporting front end you use, if you use this DSO for reporting it would generate the SID values at the runtime which will have huge impact on reporting performance. Just removing the SID generation option would temporarily fix the load issue, with quick activation of DSO but it will affect the most important area reporting performance.
Try to solve the issue with SID generation error while activating at the BW side which could be because of the special character issues and once you fix that your process chains would load fine with a far better performance while reporting on this DSO.
Regards,
Mani

Im not satasfied with 6.0 i miss youtube and some apps are slower, facebook wants premission to access my contacts, and how do i use apple tv feature with out mirroring?

Im not satasfied with 6.0, i miss youtube, some apps are slower, facebook wants premission to access my contacts, and how do i use apple tv feature with out mirroring?

That is awesome, works perfectly.
I'll get it worked into my main script. Is this Action Manager code, and not just regular Javascript from the Scripting Dictionary? I can't tell the difference. I'll see whether or not it's actually faster than Applescript.
Thanks. I know Scripting Listener records a bunch of stuff, but it's pretty amazing to me that playing back this line does the same thing that playing back the 1,011 lines Scripting Listener puts out.
Thanks.

Error occurred in deployment step 'Add Solution': A feature with ID '' has already been installed in this farm. Use the force attribute to explicitly re-install the feature.

Hi I am getting the error
Error occurred in deployment step 'Add Solution': A feature with ID 10495515-2482-41fd-98eb-3c87f739f54b has already been installed in this farm. Use the force attribute to explicitly re-install the feature.
when trying to deploy web parts
question 1 - how do i use the force attribute when deploying from visual studio
question 2 - am i deplying it to the right place, if i deply it to the
url:port that points to my central admin tool it deploys but i cant seem to see it in any of my webs in my site collection, if i deploy it to the
url:port that points to my site collection I get this error.
im new to all this by the way :)
thanks in advance

If you are deploying from Visual Studio then please follow this post:
http://sharepointfordeveloper.blogspot.com/2014/03/solved-visual-studio-issue-error.html
Open the visual Studio and navigate to the feature XML file and add the bellow attribute.
AlwaysForceInstall="TRUE"
The <FeatureName>.Template.Xml output would be some think link this.
<?xml
version="1.0"
encoding="utf-8"
?><Feature
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/"
AlwaysForceInstall="TRUE"></Feature>

HDATE feature with quota generation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for