Header condition disabled in RFQ

Hi all,
1. In RFQ document header and item condition are not in active.
When i go to RFQ header --> Conditions ( it is disabled )
Similarly RFQ item --> conditions ( it is disabled )
2. In Quotation i cannot enter the header conditions , i can enter the item condition but system is not picking the Schema which is assigned to the vendor. By default system is taking  the other condition types like P000 etc.
Can any one suggest me both the above mentioned issues.
Regards
GSG

Hi,
please check your RFQ document type first in the customizing:
Transaction "SPRO >>                
materials management >> Purchasing >> RFQ/Quotation >> Define Document         
Types"  - was the flag for   "time-dependent conditions" set for the concrete document type?                                                                               
When you use time-dependent conditions, you have to maintain                   
for your relevant condition type in pricing procedure for        
condition supplements (RM0001) in the Path "SPRO >> materials management       
>> purchasing >> conditions >> define price determination process >>           
define condition types.      
SPRO >> materials management >> purchasing >> conditions >> define price      
determination process >> Define Calculation Schema                                                                               
Procedure            RM0001 Condition Supplement Header                       
like:                                                                               
1  3 RA01 Discount % on Gross                                                 
10 1 RA00 Discount % on Net                                                   
10 2 ZA00 Surcharge % on Net                                                  
10 4 ZA01 Surcharge % on Gross                                                                               
It is required to maintain a pricing procedure for condition supplements.      
Regards,
Edit

Similar Messages

  • Pricing procedure for Header conditions in RFQ

    All SAP Gurus,
    From where system picks up the pricing procedure for header conditions for request for Quotation (RFQ) maintenance?
    Regards,

    Purchase order which you have defined for maket price determination.
    spro>MM>purchasing>conditions->define pricing determination procedure --->define calculation schema
    Regards
    Antony

  • RFQ - Header Condition (Not possible to determine a condition type)

    Hi,
    I have defined my own Condition Schema for RFQ Item Condition are working fine. But when i am trying to add header condition it is giving msg "Not possible to determine a condition type"
    Regards

    Hi,
    I have defined my own Condition Schema for RFQ Item Condition are working fine. But when i am trying to add header condition it is giving msg "Not possible to determine a condition type" and now allowing me to enter the condition on header level.
    Regards
    Edited by: Kashif Ihsan on Jun 14, 2010 3:52 PM

  • Header conditions&Effectice price

    Hi All!
    I'd like to  ask if there is a chance to make a header condition type of delivery cost in RFQ to update the effective price in inforecord?
    Any item related confition type  works fine but when I try apply the condition from header of RFQ it is distributed correctly, also correctly calculates effective price at item level but never updates effective price in inforecords.
    Can anyone help me?
    Regards,
    Grigorij.

    Thanks.
    I'm afraid you are not quite right - there is special indicator at an RFQ item which controls an update mode: with or without plant.

  • Conditionally Disable Button

    I read this thread
    Howto disable a button within APEX?
    to conditionally disable a button in a form. And it worked as per the suggestion of user FFS.
    But I want to do something similar to a button showing in a report region. There are different conditions which will show the button in the disabled mode.
    When I tried to repeat the same steps as per the above thread(user FFS comments), I couldn't create a hidden item that will come after the button I want to disable.
    I also wrote this in the page's html header section:
    <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
    if ($x('P13_EMP').value >'0')
      $x_DisableItem('SAVE');
    </script>Did not disable the button either.
    Please help.
    Using apex3.2, it is an HTML button.
    Thanks,
    RN
    Edited by: RN on Jul 20, 2011 4:05 PM

    I normally just jQuery to disable buttons. See the first response: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/577548/how-can-i-disable-a-button-in-a-jquery-dialog-from-a-function
    I think $x_DisableItem probably isn't working for you because its not an Item. You can create buttons as region buttons or as items (if I recall correctly).
    If you don't have jquery/want to load it it should be able to still do it.
    (untested code, but something to the effect):
    i.e.
    var els = document.getElementsByTagName('input');
    for (i=0;i<els.length;i++){
      if (els.type == 'button'){
    if (els[i].value == 'LABEL'){
    els[i].setAttribute('disabled', true);
    } Someone else might have a more elegant solution ;-)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • Can pricing requirement be used for manual header condition

    I have a manual header condition ZCR1 which will be entered in a sales document with doc type ZAB1. When this sales document is copied into another sales document ZAB2, I want that the manual header condition ZCR1 is not determined. Can I do this via pricing requirement? Or should I use alternation formula for condition base value and make the value of condition ZCR1 to zero when the document is copied into ZAB2.
    Both the document types are using the same pricing procedure. In copy control for all item categories from ZAB1 to ZAB2, pricing type G (Copy pricing elements unchanged and re-determine taxes). ZCR1 is a manual condition in the pricing procedure used.
    Regards
    Javed

    Hi javed
    If you want the ZCR1 manual header condition should not be determined then you need to change the pricing type in the copy control but if you assign a requirement in the pricing procedure for ZCR1 condition type  then you cant enter the ZCR1 condition type manually also as you are not meeting your requirement.
    Another option is you have to create a new requirement with the help of Technical consultant ans assign it to the  header condition type in the pricing procedure requirement feild . giving inputs to your Technical consultant that The condition type  should not be determined
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Header condition type value not displayed in sales order output

    Hi gurus,
    I have observed a strange issue regarding a header condition in a sales order.
    we have a set up like following:
    1. If the Header condition XXXX is used in sales Order then this value should be printed on sales order output.
    2. If the Header condition mentioned in above point is not maintained in sales order it should print the total price of all line items.
    Though i have maintained the header condition value in Sales Order Header its not displayed in SO output.
    That is , I have a sales order and it has one HEADER condition type entered with 3500 USD.
    In fact this value is used for some business purpose and is being printed on the sales order output for a specific output type.
    But where as in a sales order this header condition value is not getting printed on the output though I am using same data as of the sales order which is having the header condition value printed on its output.
    According to business,we must have the header condition value printed on  sales Order output.
    Please suggest how to proceed.
    Thanks in advance.

    Not sure if you are using costom smartform to print invoice, if yes then ask developer to debug and find the root cause and fix it.
    You might need to give him condition when it shuld be printed and when not.
    You can take reference of another output type for which it is printing

  • Dist. of Header Condition based on the material Value

    Hi All,
    I have one query regarding the header Condition.i have selected the Calculation type as B - fixed amount  (mandatory) for a particular Condition type and also selected the header and Item condition indicator.Now if the material have more than one line item then the system distributes this condition based on the quantities in PO.
    My client requirement is that they want to have a header condition as we are using now. But they want to distribute this header condition according to the material values for each line items in a PO. please Mention that this condition is a fixed value (mandatory).
    So, how can we make a Fixed Value (Calculation type) for a header condition to be distributed among the line items based on the base Value?
    Please revert back asap.
    Sure, points will be awarded for the same.

    as explained earlier ,
    system is distributes the header amount on the basic of value calculated by Basic X qty
    e.g.
    header value =100
    two line item
    1 is with Rs 4/- and qty is 10
    2 is with Rs 10/- and qty is 15
    so distribution is
    Rs 21.05/-  for 1st item
    and
    Rs 78.94/- for 2ed item
    regards,
    sujit

  • Validation for header condition in a Purchase Order in me21n

    Hi Experts!, I need to validate that a header condition can't be repeated in a PO, when it's be creating..
    I need your helps.. Thanks..
    Message was edited by:
            Gustavo Gil

    Hi.! Thanks everybody, I recomended this page
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/es/14/f62c7dd435d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
    , It's so usefulI, here I found the program, subrutine, and a short description, I resolve the problem using the exit USEREXIT_XKOMV_BEWERTEN_INIT..
    Regards,
    Gustavo Gil..

  • What are the valid values for CPU in conditional disable structure config?

    After diggin' around for some time (but to no avail)...
    Does somebody know the valid values for the CPU (symbol) in the conditional disable structure configuration or where I can find this information?
    Best regards,
    Horst

    Not sure but you can try this:
    http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361E-01/lvprop/app_apptarget_cpu/
    Adnan Zafar
    Certified LabVIEW Architect
    Coleman Technologies

  • Very Urgent--Adding Header condition amount in Net order value of PO

    Dear friends,
    Our client has following requirement.
    ---In Purchase order ,Header conditions related to delivery costs are using.
    --Currently when we add the header condition,that amount is not adding to the Net order value and not adding to the total value in the PO print document.But proportionaly distributing to the line items.
    --Because of this two problems one is not adding to net order so not considered for release strategy,secondas it is not adding in the net order value,header condition amount also is not coming in the total value in the print out.
    --Currently, this header amount is splitting and posting seperate line item for GR/IR clearing act in MIGO and MIRO..
    I have removed the Statistical tick and accrual tick in IMG, then header amount is adding to the Net order value and adding in the total value in the PO print. But in MIGO/MIRO, This amount is adding to the GR/IR clearing act ,instead of seperate GR/IR line item in MIGO/MIRO documents, But client wants the postings shall be made similar to previous one.
    I have checked with removing only Stastical key and not removing the accrual key.But header condition is not adding to Net order value. I have searched for User exits/BAdis,suitable are not found.
    How the Header condition amount can be added to the Net order value without removing the Statistical key in IMG.Are there any User exit/BAdis,
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Dayanand

    Dear Sairam,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Asper your suggestions i tried as follows.
    1) We have got condition types like surcharges/discounts before "Net inc dis"
        and Delivery costs/accruals/frieghts after "Net inc dis".
    2) My requirement is that whatever conditions types after Net inc dis like Del costs/Frieghts are not included in Net order value in PO,so amount is not included in Release strategy and print.Currently this amount is coming as seperate line itemGR/IR Clearing account in MIGO/MIRO.
    3) Asper your suggestion,i tried with Surcharge  condition existing before "Net inc Disc"--This is a header condition(Cond.cat is Insurance),but stastical tick is not there in Scema. I tried as it is ,amount is adding in Net order value.But seperate line item for this amount is not coming in MIGO/MIRO
    4) When i ticked the accrual key and statistical tick and added Accrual-FR1,then PO created ,amount is not adding in Net order value.
    5) When i removed only Stastical tick only even though amount is not adding.
    6) When i removed the Accrual tick also i.e both the ticks then only amount is adding in Net order value.But Line item of the header condition is not dispalying as a seperate line item in MIGO/MIRO
    For these Header conditions ,seperate line item shall come ,at the same time amount shall add in Net order Vaue for the purpose of including in the amount for Release strategy and print.
    Please suggest how to do it.
    Regards,
    Dayanand

  • How to mantain entire freight charges in header condition or header level.

    Dear - all
    when am creating a purchase order i have 2line items with different materials. but i want to give freight charges as header level for which value will be distributed to each and every line item, so for that what will i do - which is my item condition and which is header condition.
             But i want to enter the entire freight charges in header level or in header condition.
             Pls suggest the procedure for mantaing the header condition for that i enter the total freight value in header level.
    thanks
    sunil

    hi
    u can do it by checking the tick of header condition in the respective condition
    copy the condition FRA1-Freight %  or  FRB1-Freight (Value) in M/06
    then
    in changes which can be made coulumn u will get tick of header ,just tick it and add this condition to ur schema in M/08
    hope it help

  • Rounding difference in down payment for header condition

    We have header condition, marked as "group condition" for traqnsport. But when doing down payment the system calculates incorrectly - for example I enter transport $600 at header level, but because the system calculates it at item level and due to rounding, in the 50% down payment invoice it shows - 300.02. Obviously when the customer receives down payment invoice that says pay 50% of some amount and the amount to be paid is not actually 50% it would be a problem. How could this be solved? We tried modifying the form, but as the it reads values from the system which are incorrect that didn't help.

    Hello,
    Please check the customizing:
    Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
        -> Business Transactions -> Down Payment Received -> Define
        Reconciliation Accounts for Customer Down Payments
    Regards,
    Raghavendra

  • Automatic Pricing for Header condition

    Hello,
    We have the following scenario.
    For an specific Sales Order type we need to charge (surcharge or a fee) a fix $$ amount at the header level. This amount should be charged only if the total value of the order is less then a fixed $$ amount.
    Also another condition is for a specific material group we need to charge a fix $$ amount and if this condition is selected then the other condition should not be selected.
    Eg:
    1) for all material with Material group AB we want to charge(via condition type) 100$ at the header level.
    we want this automatically at the header.
    2) For all Order type OR we want to charge(I will maintain a condition type) 200$ if the net value of that sales order is less then 5000$. This is not item specific but at the Order header level.
    We dont want to manually enter the condition type (surcharge).
    I know that for Header conditions we cannot have access sequence and condition records. Then how can the 100$ or 200$ charge condition type come automatically in the Sales Order if the total order value is less then 5000$.
    I can have a requirement but what about the condition Record and the access sequence for the Order type or the material group?
    Any Ideas?
    Thanks
    SAP Fan

    hello, friend.
    i have an hypothesis (which is merely a guess because i have not tried this recently), that it is possible to do this, but you have make your condition type both header and item, which means you get to assign an access sequence (enabling condition records).  but you must also "tick" the "group condition" in the condition type so that even if this is entered at item level, this applies to the entire document and will be distributed to the items.
    the group condition is supposed to be used for manually entered header conditions such as pallet discounts, and i think i might have done this for material groups, but do not recall if i've done this for order type or any other variable at one point.  please do us a favor and test it, and post your findings.
    regards!!!
    Edited by: jonathan y on Jun 1, 2009 3:08 PM

  • Header Condition Records for Promotions

    Hi,
    I have created a sales deal with a promotion with say X payment terms and customer/material promotional discounts.
    The issue is that the while order is created deal is being picked up at the item level for material price conditions. i.e. it shows the discount and the payment terms as per the sales deal.
    The Header level pmt terms do not change. How can I include at Header condition level a payment term as per the sales deal for auto determination.
    Also how can a Header conidition type say RB00 discount be added to the sales deal for auto determination as in a sales deal the only option of valid conditon types to create condition records is essentially K007, KA00, K020, PR00.
    One guess I have here is to add condtion type RB00, but which table, looks like then it probably gets into modifying ABAP table KNUMA. Is there something I am missing here for an alternative way out!!
    Tks!!

    Hi UN,
    I didnt gte you question.. as my understanding, you can put payment terms in 3 levels...
    1) Company code level,
    2) Sales area level
    3) Item level
    if you give three payment terms, at order level sales area will come and item level it come at item level.. goto vk11 and go additional data tabpage give payment terms.. you will get when ever you are giveing that discount...
    Reward if it helps..
    Ramki

Maybe you are looking for