Header condition of PO should automaticaly taken in to item level

Hi
We have a problem of including condtion value for PO line items. We need to get disribute the condition values once it is entered in to the header level, based on the quantity of line item we are purchasing in the PO. Please advice how to do this.
Regards
Kesharika

Hi Kesharika,
If the condition is set as a group condition, the amount
entered on the header is distributed proportionally (that is, in the
relationship of the relevant condition bases at item level) and a
rounding difference adjustment may be carried out.
Please read note 876617 - FAQ: Header conditions/header condition screen.
Regards,
Edit

Similar Messages

Header condition type should not be editable at item level

Hi gurus,
could you please help me with the following question.
Our requirement is to provide header discounts manually at header level which should not be editable at item level. So I've created condition type as Header condition.
When we manually add this condition at header level in Sales order, it is copied to the item level and is not editable there.
But after saving the SO, we find that the header discounts appearing at the item level becomes editable.
Kindly advice how to make the condition type as non-editable at item level.
Thanks in advance.
Sunny.

hi Sunny,
please check your condition type for discount in section 'Changes which can be made', wheather it used only for the header level or item level or both of it.
if you want to make the condition is not editable in item level, then you must made the condition type just for the header level.
beside changing the configuration in the condition type, you can protect it via BADI but it needs more programming.
if you insist to use the BADI, you can made the implementation of class CRM_ORDER_FIELDCHECK BADI
hopes it helps
cheers

Pricing Header Condition Issue.

Dear Friends,
In the sales order we are using the header condition for distributing the values to the sales order line items 10, 20, 30u2026etc, if I have activated reason for rejections to line item 10, the header level condition value should not be shared to the line item 10,
Eg: Header Condition Value: 600, it is distributed to line item 10, 20, 30 on value basis, so the Values are Line Item u2013 10 = 200, 20 = 100, and 30 = 300.
Here If have activated Reason for rejection for line item 20, the header condition value 600/- should be distribute to line item 10 = 240, 30 = 360. Header condition value should not be distributed to Line item 20. it should be 0/-.
Friends please suggest me how to over come this issue.
Regards,
Hari Krishna

Check in your customization for the Reason for rejection that you are using in your sales order (I think the path is spro-sd-sales-Sls doc item-Reason for rejection.
The Statistical field in that should be X. If there is an X, then as soon as you reject line 20 with that Reason, the values would be redistributed to the other 2 remaining line items.

Header condition value is changing in Invoice compare to Sales Order

Hi,
I have created one Sales Order with five line items and total quantity is 100 units. I have one header condition type and the value is 1000 USD in Sales Order.
Now I have created delivery and changed the quantity from 100 units to 105 units..
And than I have created Invoice. If i check the Header condition type value now it it 1100 USD instead of 1000USD(header condition type value should be the same as in Sales Order)
Can anyone suggest me why the header condition value is changing in Invoice where as it should be as same as in Order?
Thank you for your support
Best Regards
Amjathpasha

Hi Amjad,
You might check in copy controls for the Pricing type if the prices are getting re-determined at the time of billing.
Although, if it is, the value should have been 1050 USD and not 1100 USD.
As you know item condiitons for all the items are added up to the header, you might want to analyze item conditions as well.
Also, since you are delivering 105 units instead of 100, do you still want the system to charge for 100 units? Or is it something related to under-delivery/over-delivery tolerance?
Regards,
Amit

Very Urgent--Adding Header condition amount in Net order value of PO

Dear friends,
Our client has following requirement.
---In Purchase order ,Header conditions related to delivery costs are using.
--Currently when we add the header condition,that amount is not adding to the Net order value and not adding to the total value in the PO print document.But proportionaly distributing to the line items.
--Because of this two problems one is not adding to net order so not considered for release strategy,secondas it is not adding in the net order value,header condition amount also is not coming in the total value in the print out.
--Currently, this header amount is splitting and posting seperate line item for GR/IR clearing act in MIGO and MIRO..
I have removed the Statistical tick and accrual tick in IMG, then header amount is adding to the Net order value and adding in the total value in the PO print. But in MIGO/MIRO, This amount is adding to the GR/IR clearing act ,instead of seperate GR/IR line item in MIGO/MIRO documents, But client wants the postings shall be made similar to previous one.
I have checked with removing only Stastical key and not removing the accrual key.But header condition is not adding to Net order value. I have searched for User exits/BAdis,suitable are not found.
How the Header condition amount can be added to the Net order value without removing the Statistical key in IMG.Are there any User exit/BAdis,
Please suggest.
Regards,
Dayanand

Dear Sairam,
Thanks for your reply.
Asper your suggestions i tried as follows.
1) We have got condition types like surcharges/discounts before "Net inc dis"
and Delivery costs/accruals/frieghts after "Net inc dis".
2) My requirement is that whatever conditions types after Net inc dis like Del costs/Frieghts are not included in Net order value in PO,so amount is not included in Release strategy and print.Currently this amount is coming as seperate line itemGR/IR Clearing account in MIGO/MIRO.
3) Asper your suggestion,i tried with Surcharge condition existing before "Net inc Disc"--This is a header condition(Cond.cat is Insurance),but stastical tick is not there in Scema. I tried as it is ,amount is adding in Net order value.But seperate line item for this amount is not coming in MIGO/MIRO
4) When i ticked the accrual key and statistical tick and added Accrual-FR1,then PO created ,amount is not adding in Net order value.
5) When i removed only Stastical tick only even though amount is not adding.
6) When i removed the Accrual tick also i.e both the ticks then only amount is adding in Net order value.But Line item of the header condition is not dispalying as a seperate line item in MIGO/MIRO
For these Header conditions ,seperate line item shall come ,at the same time amount shall add in Net order Vaue for the purpose of including in the amount for Release strategy and print.
Please suggest how to do it.
Regards,
Dayanand

Why we cant have access sequence for header condition ?

hi ,
i have one query in pricing.
Can we assign access sequence for header condition ? if yes how ?
if not why ? please explain

Hi there,
It is always possible to have work around to solve issue without refer to OSS to change any programming coding.
We want to have a freight charge appear on each sales order automatically according to some condition. Most of the time, this freight charge is a flat rate (if it is depend on qty or value, then we're so easy to set it in item level).
In order to do so, we'll have one assumption. The item line number of sales order is auto running number, like 10, 20 and etc created by system and not manually input.
Then we create a pricing condition type like other discount or charge in ITEM LEVEL with your selected condition like customer, sales office, country and etc. However, remember to add the sales item line as part of the condition of this pricing condition.
Update the pricing procedure and create price condition record with say "10" for the sales item line. Since you'll have line number 10 for all sales order as first line (no mater it is a free of charge item or not). This new condition will generate a "freight cost" in the pricing procedure. And it is only apply to first line, therefore, we only get once of this charge for one order.
Hope this is your case and it works with ours.
Michael

Pricing : Frieght calculation - differentiate Header and Item level

Dear friends,
I have a requirement wherein I have to find the sum of the gross weight of all line items at header level and round off the value to the next 500 gms.This value will be shown at the Header Conditions tab in the condition record ZFRD.
The rounding off should not happen at the item level (i.e in Item - Conditions tab ).
I have developed a base type for this.But at the configuration level, the group condition and item condition are checked, Hence the rounding off works at the header as well as the ITEM level.
Can anyone suggest me if there is any field which differentiate between header and item calculation.
So that I can check that field and restrict the pricing only to the header level.
i am trying this functionality at pricing procedure level by creating a new formula for condition base value and passing gross weight to XKWERT field.
Thanks in Advance!!!!

Hi
Have you tried to save a document and check what you can see for that condition?
I think the header value is being transfered to the item while you're debugging
When you'tr header level PRICING_COMPLETE should be called
Max

Header level to be copied to item level

hi,
   i would like to make pricing condition at header level then the base amount should be equaly devided amound the line items.
pls advice me with the settings.
regards
sreekanth

hai srikant this is srinivasNaidu
first, the Basic Price should not be Header condition
        ex: in one sales order two line items are there
             (a) car
             (b) bike
   in this case how u want to charge the same price for both
   ok if u want according to your business requirement
pl follow the configuration settings of HeaderConditions ex
   HA00, HB00,(but don't foreget that these are discounts) ok

Shopping cart header status differs to status at line item level

Hello
I am using SRM 5.5 EC, got a situation where there is a single line shopping cart which has been approved. The status on the header is still showing "awaiting approval" but at line item level it shows as being "approved" and no follow on document has been created.
Can anyone help and let me know why this has happened and how to change the header status now?
Many Thanks in Advance
Prakash

OK found a solution

Discount header condition should adjust automatically in line items

Hi,
I have a discount header group condition which is adjusting automatically in line items based on net price. Even if I delete one line item out of two lien items, header discount value is adjusting to balance 1st line automatically. This is hapneing in QT and in sales order without reference, but not hapening for sales order where I referenced with quotation.
Ex: I have created QT with ZD03 = -2000. This distributed for line item 1 as -1500 and 2nd line item as -500. (Here in QT if I delete the 2nd line item, then ZD03 for 1st line item is automatically adjusted as -2000 and header remains same as -2000). Now if I converted this QT to SO with same 2 line items and then in that SO if I delete 2nd line item, ZD03 for 1st line item remains as -1500 only and header changing from -2000 to -1500.
I don't want this to happen. I want the header value to remain same as -2000, irrespective of what I do for the sales order line items.
Kindly suggest.
Ratna

Hi,
Just test your requirement by going into the Condition type configuration TC V/06 for the "ZD03" ,under changes which can be made remove the Header condition and mark it as item condition and try the sales cycle.
Regards,
Ravi

Can pricing requirement be used for manual header condition

I have a manual header condition ZCR1 which will be entered in a sales document with doc type ZAB1. When this sales document is copied into another sales document ZAB2, I want that the manual header condition ZCR1 is not determined. Can I do this via pricing requirement? Or should I use alternation formula for condition base value and make the value of condition ZCR1 to zero when the document is copied into ZAB2.
Both the document types are using the same pricing procedure. In copy control for all item categories from ZAB1 to ZAB2, pricing type G (Copy pricing elements unchanged and re-determine taxes). ZCR1 is a manual condition in the pricing procedure used.
Regards
Javed

Hi javed
If you want the ZCR1 manual header condition should not be determined then you need to change the pricing type in the copy control but if you assign a requirement in the pricing procedure for ZCR1 condition type then you cant enter the ZCR1 condition type manually also as you are not meeting your requirement.
Another option is you have to create a new requirement with the help of Technical consultant ans assign it to the header condition type in the pricing procedure requirement feild . giving inputs to your Technical consultant that The condition type should not be determined
Regards
Srinath

Header condition type value not displayed in sales order output

Hi gurus,
I have observed a strange issue regarding a header condition in a sales order.
we have a set up like following:
1. If the Header condition XXXX is used in sales Order then this value should be printed on sales order output.
2. If the Header condition mentioned in above point is not maintained in sales order it should print the total price of all line items.
Though i have maintained the header condition value in Sales Order Header its not displayed in SO output.
That is , I have a sales order and it has one HEADER condition type entered with 3500 USD.
In fact this value is used for some business purpose and is being printed on the sales order output for a specific output type.
But where as in a sales order this header condition value is not getting printed on the output though I am using same data as of the sales order which is having the header condition value printed on its output.
According to business,we must have the header condition value printed on sales Order output.
Please suggest how to proceed.
Thanks in advance.

Not sure if you are using costom smartform to print invoice, if yes then ask developer to debug and find the root cause and fix it.
You might need to give him condition when it shuld be printed and when not.
You can take reference of another output type for which it is printing

Automatic Pricing for Header condition

Hello,
We have the following scenario.
For an specific Sales Order type we need to charge (surcharge or a fee) a fix $$ amount at the header level. This amount should be charged only if the total value of the order is less then a fixed $$ amount.
Also another condition is for a specific material group we need to charge a fix $$ amount and if this condition is selected then the other condition should not be selected.
Eg:
1) for all material with Material group AB we want to charge(via condition type) 100$ at the header level.
we want this automatically at the header.
2) For all Order type OR we want to charge(I will maintain a condition type) 200$ if the net value of that sales order is less then 5000$. This is not item specific but at the Order header level.
We dont want to manually enter the condition type (surcharge).
I know that for Header conditions we cannot have access sequence and condition records. Then how can the 100$ or 200$ charge condition type come automatically in the Sales Order if the total order value is less then 5000$.
I can have a requirement but what about the condition Record and the access sequence for the Order type or the material group?
Any Ideas?
Thanks
SAP Fan

hello, friend.
i have an hypothesis (which is merely a guess because i have not tried this recently), that it is possible to do this, but you have make your condition type both header and item, which means you get to assign an access sequence (enabling condition records). but you must also "tick" the "group condition" in the condition type so that even if this is entered at item level, this applies to the entire document and will be distributed to the items.
the group condition is supposed to be used for manually entered header conditions such as pallet discounts, and i think i might have done this for material groups, but do not recall if i've done this for order type or any other variable at one point. please do us a favor and test it, and post your findings.
regards!!!
Edited by: jonathan y on Jun 1, 2009 3:08 PM

Same condition type on header and item level = printing problem

Hi
I have a customer using some condition types on both item level and header level in quotations, orders, invoices ...
In the pricing procedures it is customized (V_T683S-DRUKZ) that the conditions must be printed on header level (that is at the bottom of the documents).
My job is to make the Smartform to print the documents, and I want it of course to be as close to SAP standard as possible.
SAP standard will print these conditions on header level even if the conditions are at item level, but my customer wants the conditions created on header level to be printed on header level and conditions created on item level to be printed on item level.
I'm no pricing expert, so my question is:
Will it be fair if I tell the customer that using the same condition types on header and item level is bad practices - or at least bad karma?
Best regards
Thomas Madsen Nielsen

Hi Shiva Ram and Madhu
I have no problem understanding header vs. item conditions, so I really don't see anything in oss note 876617, that is relevant in this case.
Madhu - I do not agree that everything is fine. My issue is that I want to stick as closely to SAP standard customizing as possible. In SAP standard customizing of a condition type you can use the flag V_T683S-DRUKZ to determine if the condition should be printed on header OR item level - you can not choose both header AND item level.
I have a SAP standard smartform using two functions modules for reading header and item conditions. RV_PRICE_PRINT_ITEM and RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD. These function modules are based on the DRUKZ customizing flag and a condition marked for printing on header level will be supplied by RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD even when the condition is on item level.
My point is: SAP standard customizing does not support printing of same condition on both header and item level. I can of course write tons of code to work around this problem, but that would be bad practices

Header Condition giving abnormal values

HI,
This problem occured in multiple number of contract release POs. We use a customized header condition type ZHES as a PO clearing charge which is also a group condition.
At PO header level we maintain a current fixed exchange rate as well.
Problem is once it's maintained it doesn't give the correct local value or the USD converted rate. It gives an abnormal figure and even this figure shows value X at change mode and value Y at display mode.
I just can't understand the cause for this abnormal scenario
Pls help
Thanx

Hi,
Was the pricing schema changed in the meantime? Please check the changes to the PO item: have been any items deleted in the meantime? (EKPO-STAPO <> X, statistical conditions should be checked)
Please check also the following notes:
1049600    Header condition multiplies if activated repeatedly
876617     FAQ: Header conditions/header condition screen, check especially question 6,
456691         FAQ: Price determination in purchasing
Regards,
Edit

Header condition of PO should automaticaly taken in to item level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for