Header PO discount, not apportioned to line item

Hi MM Gurus
My client wants to create a multi line item PO and also will like to include the header discount (value based). The client does not want the discount to be apportioned to each line item. He wants the line items to be received and paid at its original cost. Can someone suggest if this can be done and how?
Here is the example:
PO with 3 lines
Line one 100 each @ 25 = $2500
Line two 200 eaxh @ 30 = $6000
Line three 150 each @ 10 = $1500
Header discount = $500
Line items still remain at their actual values. The discount is not applied to line items. Upon LIV, the PO line items received at actual price, but the overall discount adjusted.
Any guidance will be appreciated.
Regards,
Vinay

Hi.
I'm not sure if the following info help you.
But how about to set the "Condition is used for
statistics" flag V_T683S-KSTAT?
You can set it in your pricing procedure and
for your condition type.
As far as I know, the header condition is not reflected to
the net price.(Though reflected to the "effective price".)
When GR, GR/IR will be from net price.
Best regards.
Keiichiro

Similar Messages

  • Cash Discount Calculated for One Line Item and not for Other

    Hi All,
    We have devloped a Z program which is used to Write of InterCompany AR and AP recon Account to another GL Account. In this program to clear line item we have created a BDC which calls t-code FB05. Thsi program is running perfectly fine for all company codes.
    There is new company code SG20 for which it is not clearing the line items. It has created a Session in SM35, when we analysed the seesin we found that for some line items system is calculating Cash Discount and for some other line items it is not but the payment Term is same for all the douments with 3% 14days.
    I need your help in understanding that why for some line items system calculates the Cash Discout where as for others it is not calculation..also the Posting Date is same for all the documents.
    Please advise what could be the reson for this.
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    VIvek Srivastava

    Hi
    Cash discount is calculated based on the combination of baseline date and payment term conditions.
    Hence please check the baseline date for all the documents, in which the cash discount is not appearing.
    In your case, the possible reasons could be that 1) baseline date is different between these documents or 2) payment terms cash % is manually modified in the line item of the documents.
    Regards

  • GR of Delivery completed item not possible for line item of PO/SA ?

    Hi,
    Am unable to Receive Goods in MIGO an Error - "GR of delivery completed item not possible for line item of PO/SA"?
    Regards
    Mohammed Khaja Pasha
    +919550917395.

    Hi Mohammed Khaja Pasha ;
    Delivery Completed checkbox provides a lot of fonctionality like an additional delivery is not expected, but is possible. If you prevent posting of migo , you can benefit from system messages M7 163 and 254.
    You want to ensure that the delivery is made before the planned delivery date : Set message 254.
    You want to ensure last possible delivery date : Set message 163.
    However ;
    The open PO quantity of the PO item equals zero.
    The PO item is no longer relevant for materials planning.
    The PO item is ignored when letters urging delivery of overdue goods are generated.
    The PO item can be deleted and archived.
    You can specify whether the Delivery Completed checkbox is to be selected automatically.
    Regards.
    M.Ozgur Unal

  • Error - Balancing Line Item Profit Center not filled in Line Item 007

    Hi
    I am trying to do a transfer posting from one vendor account to another. However, system is giving an error - Balancing Line Item Profit Center not filled in line Item 001. Pls suggest.
    Regards
    Vaibhav

    hi  vaibhav
    you go through this Tcode  FAGL3KEH  and maintain default profit centre. in the  error message system shown GL accounts
    hope you userstand
    thanks
    dharmendar

  • Not cleared two line items from the GR/IR clearing

    For one of the items in PO following transactions are done...
            Mtype   Date            Quantity             Amount
    GR   101    06/14/09        1 02.001            887.85
    GR   102    06/14/09        102.001-            887.85
    GR   101    06/14/09        101.999             887.85
    GR   101    07/22/09        102.001             923.61
    IR-L            06/14/09        102.001            887.85
    IR-L            06/14/09        101.999            887.85
    FBL3N: out put
    Open items
    Doc Type  Date                           Amount
    WE           06/14/2009 86            887.85
    WE           07/22/2009 96            923.61-
    Cleared items:
    Doc Type  Date                           Amount                                                                     
    WE            06/14/2009  96              887.85-
    Z9             06/09/2009  86              887.85
    WE            06/14/2009  96              887.85-
    Z9             06/09/2009  86              887.85
    System has not cleared two line items from the GR/IR clearing for this line item in PO.
    What could be the reason these items are not cleared and now how these line
    items can be cleared?

    Hi,
    When the Dr and Cr amount are equal to zero system will automatically clear the line items in F.13.  Here the open items are appearing with different amounts due to that system not able to clear.
    By passing some manual JV or something you done to make Dr and Cr equal to zero then you clear through F-03(untick post automatically for this clearing in T.cdoe FS00)
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • GL display for inventory account which are not defined as line item display

    Hi All,
    We have inventory gl accounts which are auto post accounts , these accounts get posted when grn is done. these accounts are not defined as line item display accounts, but if we execute the T code: FS10 we get the gl balance display and not line item display.
    Our requirement is that we should be able to view the line item display matching the GL account balance in that GL account.
    Can we get the report in MM module line items wise display.
    Regards
    Prashant P. Zinge

    Hello,
    You should use RFSEPA01 program via execute SE38 transaction.
    This program activate line item for each account. Activation means, this program generate line items to BSIS table. So that after this program running, you can see line items in FBL3N.
    Regards,
    Burak

  • After Release material in PR not create new line item material

    Hi friends
              I m facing a problem in PR . When PR is Release then  not add new line item in existing PR. It have any solution .
    pls give the solution .
    thanks .
    Anup .

    Hi,
    Go to ME54N > Here reverse Release of PR and then add the new line item and then release it again.
    OR if you don't want to do as above then Go to SPRO > MM > Purchase Requisition > Release Procedure > Procedure with Classification > Set Up Procedure with Classification > Release indicator > Here for Release indicator "2" (RFQ/purchase order), if you have entered Changeabil. as "1" then change it to "4"
    Also check if you have assigned a Field Selection Key as only Display PR then you have to change it or remove it.

  • Discount header condition should adjust automatically in line items

    Hi,
    I have a discount header group condition which is adjusting automatically in line items based on net price. Even if I delete one line item out of two lien items, header discount value is adjusting to balance 1st line automatically. This is hapneing in QT and in sales order without reference, but not hapening for sales order where I referenced with quotation.
    Ex: I have created QT with ZD03 = -2000. This distributed for line item 1 as -1500 and 2nd line item as -500. (Here in QT if I delete the 2nd line item, then ZD03 for 1st line item is automatically adjusted as -2000 and header remains same as -2000). Now if I converted this QT to SO with same 2 line items and then in that SO if I delete 2nd line item, ZD03 for 1st line item remains as -1500 only and header changing from -2000 to -1500.
    I don't want this to happen. I want the header value to remain same as -2000, irrespective of what I do for the sales order line items.
    Kindly suggest.
    Ratna

    Hi,
    Just test your requirement by going into the Condition type configuration TC V/06 for the "ZD03" ,under changes which can be made remove the Header condition and mark it as item condition and try the sales cycle.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Condition in purchase order not distributed in line items

    Hi All,
        I have a condition ZD21 (delivery charges) in purchase order.  When i enter the condition at header level, it supposed to distribute the charges among line items.  However sap put the entire amount in one of the line items.   The condition has condition class A (surchage), Calc typ B(Fixed Amt) and B as cond cat.   Header condition is selected (not item).
       Sometimes system populate an amount at the header level for this delivery charge.
    How can i get the amount to distribute to all line items ?  Also, where is the populated amount coming from ?  Anyone with any suggestions ?
    thanks
    joyce

    Hi Tej,
      Group condition and Header condition were selected.  I noticed that  for other plants, the delivery distribution works but not for this plant.  This wouldn't have anything to do with plants, right ?
    What is the group based on for Group Condition  ?   Thanks.
    Edited by: Joyce Chan on Jan 10, 2012 2:54 PM

  • Discount for the first line item

    Hi Folks,
    As i have a requirement from my client to give the discuont for the first line item from two .Pls help me in finding the sol for this following requirement
    My client has two materials Material X and Material y .Client wants to  give 5% discuount on Material X when the the customer buys Material Y also along with material x .So the end customer will recieve the discount of 5% on Material X only when he order material Y along with X.
    Pls contribute your valuable tips in finding the sol for this .

    Hi Avinash,
    As you know already this is not standard functionality and is difficult to implement in SAP ERP.
    IMHO this kind of Business Rules should be managed in a separate CRM, which does not have to be SAP CRM.
    It could be an customer CRM application developed in .Net (Visual Studio) or Java technology, much easier to maintain that in ABAP and that could be used "on the road" by pre-sellers.
    The application would generate the manual discounts when needed and then create the Sales Order in SAP ERP when syncronizing using the standard Sales Order BAPI.
    I am sure that is not the answer you were waiting for ....
    Best Regards,
    Franck

  • SAP Note 1486147 - TDS line item details not flowing in Form 16 A Samrtform

    1.     Old Form 16 certificate is printed before 01.04.2010 and new certificate after 01.04.2010. (its correct SAP has written code in such a manner Old one is SAP script and new on is Smartform.)
    Old FORM 16 A gets Acknowledgement No details correctly.
    2.     Acknowledgment No details are not flowing in the NEW Smart Form of Form 16 A.
    When I debug the program I can see PARTNER No details are copied in PAN NO field in TABLE : IT_LFA11[]
    BUT PARTNER NO details are copied to PARTNERNO field  in TABLE IT_LAFA1[].
    TDS line item details on Smart Form is printed based on Partner no. here partner no. is blank as IT_LFA11 table is passed to smartform..
    Program name : J_1IEWT_CERT
    Include name : J_1IEWT_CERT_F01.
    Code:
    FORM CALL_FORM .
      DATA: h_formname TYPE tdsfname,
              h_fmname TYPE rs38l_fnam,
              h_output_info  TYPE  ssfcrescl,
              h_spoolids TYPE LINE OF ssfcrescl-spoolids,
              h_output_options TYPE ssfcompop,
               spoolno(10) TYPE c.
      DATA : it_lfa11 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_LFA1 INITIAL SIZE 0,
             it_printtab TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_PRINTTAB INITIAL SIZE 0,
             it_deduc TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_DEDUCTEE INITIAL SIZE 0,
             it_qrtrtab TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_QRTRTAB INITIAL SIZE 0,
             it_challan TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF J_1I_CHALLANDETAB INITIAL SIZE 0.
      SORT challandetab BY j_1iextchdt DESCENDING.
      it_lfa11[] = it_lfa1[].
      it_printtab[] = printtab[].
      it_deduc[] = it_deductor[].
      it_qrtrtab[] = qrtrtab[].
      it_challan[] = challandetab[].
      h_output_options-tdnewid    = 'X'.
      h_formname = layout.
      CALL FUNCTION 'SSF_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME'
        EXPORTING
          formname                 = h_formname
    *   VARIANT                  = ' '
    *   DIRECT_CALL              = ' '
       IMPORTING
         fm_name                  = h_fmname
    * EXCEPTIONS
    *   NO_FORM                  = 1
    *   NO_FUNCTION_MODULE       = 2
    *   OTHERS                   = 3
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    * MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
    *         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
      ENDIF.
      CALL FUNCTION h_fmname
    EXPORTING
    *   ARCHIVE_INDEX              =
    *   ARCHIVE_INDEX_TAB          =
    *   ARCHIVE_PARAMETERS         =
    *   CONTROL_PARAMETERS         =
    *   MAIL_APPL_OBJ              =
    *   MAIL_RECIPIENT             =
    *   MAIL_SENDER                =
       OUTPUT_OPTIONS             = h_output_options
    *   USER_SETTINGS              = 'X'
    IMPORTING
    *   DOCUMENT_OUTPUT_INFO       =
       job_output_info            =  h_output_info
    *   JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS         =
        TABLES
          it_lfa1                    =   it_lfa11
          it_printtab                = it_printtab
          it_deductee                = it_deduc
          it_qrtrtab                 = it_qrtrtab
          it_challandetab            = it_challan
    * EXCEPTIONS
    *   FORMATTING_ERROR           = 1
    *   INTERNAL_ERROR             = 2
    *   SEND_ERROR                 = 3
    *   USER_CANCELED              = 4
    *   OTHERS                     = 5
      IF sy-subrc = 0.                                          "1375614
        CLEAR :spoolno,h_spoolids.
        READ TABLE h_output_info-spoolids INTO h_spoolids INDEX 1.
        IF h_spoolids IS NOT INITIAL.
          spoolno  = h_spoolids.
          CONDENSE :spoolno.
          MESSAGE i155(id_wt) WITH spoolno.
          PERFORM update_cert_tables.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    * MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
    *         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
      ENDIF.
    ENDFORM.     
    Can anyone Please help me to get TDS details on the Smartform.
    Regards,
    DivyaLalwani.
    Edited by: kishan P on Feb 23, 2011 1:28 PM

    Hi,
    Achnowledgement details comes in table it_qrtrtab at run time in the smartform, you can dibug the program j_1iewt_cert and smartforms J_1iewt_cert where at run time you will able to see data avaialability, If values are not available in this internal table then check related notes given by SAP, I have already implemented this note and also faced same issue but my FI consultant has given me the related note and my issue was resolved.
    Please checkout related notes and data population in the dibugger.
    Regards,
    Umang Mehta

  • Shopping cart header status differs to status at line item level

    Hello
    I am using SRM 5.5 EC, got a situation where there is a single line shopping cart which has been approved. The status on the header is still showing "awaiting approval" but at line item level it shows as being "approved" and no follow on document has been created.
    Can anyone help and let me know why this has happened and how to change the header status now?
    Many Thanks in Advance
    Prakash

    OK found a solution

  • SRM 4.0: Source of Supplier not copying in line item on Shopping Cart

    We are using SRM 4.0 in an extended classic setup and currently experiencing a problem with the source of supplier not being copied on line items. The user stated that  when copying a line items in a shopping cart the source of supplier is not copying to the new line.  It happens sometimes but not everytime the client uses the line copy option.
    It was initially thought that based on the amount of the line item (>=$25,000) that would cause the source of supplier (vendor) not to copy to the new line item but it has been verified by client that is not the case.  If anyone has seen this issue and know of what the root cause could be please let me know.
    Thanks

    Yann,
    Actually this is occurring when the user is creating a shopping cart from scratch.  He added a line item either from catalog or free text, sources the item and then uses the copy function to copy the line item.  When the client does this the item is copied but the vendor disappears from the 2nd line item and client has to add it again. 
    So that OSS notes doesn't apply unless I'm missing something.

  • F110 PAYMENT RUN NOT PICKING UP LINE ITEMS

    Hi Everyone,
    We use the APP functionality to pay customers credit memo. so when running F110, we indicate the credit memo document number in the further selection criteria in F110. It has always been working fine, but some customer that we have paid before, we ran F110 and it cleared some documents but did not clear the others. The line item is sitting in the customers account correctly and the payment terms is the one we have always used (2% 15 days net 30days).
    What do you think i can check againg

    hi Adeola,
    See for running the F110 the payment must be overdue then only can able to run the APP run.
    As you have mentioned in ur seetings only that the payment terms is set for 30 days.
    As this payments is not yet overdue.
    If you Run after 30 days then you can run the Payment run.
    Please let me know, is this helpfull to u.....
    Regards
    Ranjit

  • Custom table Not deleting the line items on the order.

    Hi All
    I have an issue, In SAP  we have created a custom table which is related to ship to party, as and when we delete any line items in the order(VBAP)  it should update /delete the custom table but it is not deleting, while when we create any line items in the order (VBAP) it is updating  the entries in the custom table which is suppose to happen.
    Please let me know your inputs.
    Thanks,
    Ram

    UPDKZ is not a field name. it is the processing status of a line or order.
    If UPDKZ is I , its initial, like adding a new line
    If UPDKZ is U, its update. Like changing or modifying an existing line
    ....so on...
    Regards
    Sai

Maybe you are looking for