HELP - Message Driven Design
Hi people,
we're looking for colleagues who have also implemented a system with
asynchronous components.
As we were testing this kind of design, we discovered that response times
were very very slow (6 seconds, with no work to be done for the components).
When message driven bean 1 sent messages to message driven bean 2, it took 6
seconds !!
This kind of behaviour makes an asynchronous design totally unusable for us.
Are asynchronous components unusable for any kind of performing application
Please give us some feedback,
Jubin Zawar
well so far we tested on jboss, now its weblogics turn :))
i am intending to design an application with asynchronous components.
there will be requests posted on topics, and these components will be
retrieving requests from topics, work on them as long as far as they can,
and then repost the results on topics.
other components may take these results and continue working on them, and so
on ... I think you get the idea.
this means of course a large amount of messages and topics, this also means
that message delivery must not take more than 0.1 seconds.
we will have around 100 topics and 20 types of messagedriven EJBs in there.
so we decided to test the performance and response times for this kind of
application, while the ejbs are not yet developed.
we decided for this simple scenario to benchmark :
PostingClient posts to Topic1.
MDB1 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic1, gets the message, puts
its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic2.
MDB2 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic2, gets the message, puts
its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic3.
MDB3 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic2, gets the message, puts
its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic4.
MDB4 (a message driven EJB) is listening on topic2, gets the message, puts
its time of receipt in the message, and sends it to topic1.
and when the message is posted to topic1, MDB1 regets the message.
There is another listener on topic1 --> MonitoringClient.
MonitoringClient gets the messages arriving there, and reports the times the
message took between the 4 MDBs.
Summary : the messages sent into the BEA Server remain in there, and make
loops from MDB1 to MDB4 and back again, endlessly.
We tested this scenario on jboss, with 50 messages only. We got times of 2
to 5 seconds.
It is also "funny" that the times the MonitoringClient reports are longer
and longer, they start at 2, and get to 5.
The max pool size was 200.
We will be testing this scenario on BEA too, but what do you think about the
test ?
Best regards,
Jubin Zawar
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Woollen" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:
weblogic.developer.interest.ejb,weblogic.developer.interest.ejb.ejb20,weblog
ic.developer.interest.misc
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:46 AM
Subject: Re: HELP - Message Driven Design
Jubin Zawar wrote:
Hi people,
we're looking for colleagues who have also implemented a system with
asynchronous components.
As we were testing this kind of design, we discovered that response
times
were very very slow (6 seconds, with no work to be done for thecomponents).
When message driven bean 1 sent messages to message driven bean 2, ittook 6
seconds !!6 seconds seems very long for a JMS message. Can you provide anymore
information?
This kind of behaviour makes an asynchronous design totally unusable for
us.
>>
Are asynchronous components unusable for any kind of performingapplication
?No, that is not true.
-- Rob
Please give us some feedback,
Jubin Zawar
Similar Messages
-
Help : Message Driven bean seeing the same message multiple times.
( We are using weblogic 8.1 on Solaris )
We have a bunch of message driven beans with the transaction type as 'Container' and the acknowledge-mode mode as auto-acknowledge. They are consuming messages from a weblogic Queue ( javax.jms.Queue ). The MBD container is also weblogic 8.1.
We have 7 instances of the bean consuming messages.
Most of the messages are picked up and processed only once as expected.
But randomly we are seeing that sometimes the same message is delivered again ( Message.getJmsRedelivered = true ) eventhough it was once picked up and processed successfully once.
We are completely lost and our production machine is in big trouble as a result of this.
( Is it possible that weblogic uses unreliable UDP for acknowledging messages. If yes where do we change this setting )
Any help will be greatly appreciated
Thanks
--sony
================ejb-jar.xml BEGIN
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC '-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0//EN' 'http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd'>
<ejb-jar>
<enterprise-beans>
<message-driven>
<description>DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</description>
<ejb-name>DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</ejb-name>
<ejb-class>
com.bellsouth.snt.idm.ejb.wfac.DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB
</ejb-class>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<message-selector>
<![CDATA[ idm_state = 'dsl_updt_dd_post' ]]>
</message-selector>
<acknowledge-mode>auto-acknowledge</acknowledge-mode>
<message-driven-destination>
<destination-type>javax.jms.Queue</destination-type>
</message-driven-destination>
<env-entry>
<env-entry-name>MDB_NAME</env-entry-name>
<env-entry-type>java.lang.String</env-entry-type>
<env-entry-value>dsl_updt_dd_post</env-entry-value>
</env-entry>
<!--security-identity><use-caller-identity/></security-identity-->
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jms/QueueConnectionFactory</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
<res-sharing-scope>Shareable</res-sharing-scope>
</resource-ref>
</message-driven>
</enterprise-beans>
<assembly-descriptor>
<container-transaction>
<method>
<ejb-name>DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</ejb-name>
<method-name>*</method-name>
</method>
<trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
</container-transaction>
</assembly-descriptor>
</ejb-jar>
================ejb-jar.xml END
================weblogic-ejb-jar.xml BEGIN
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE weblogic-ejb-jar PUBLIC '-//BEA Systems, Inc.//DTD WebLogic 8.1.0 EJB//EN' 'http://www.bea.com/servers/wls810/dtd/weblogic-ejb-jar.dtd'>
<weblogic-ejb-jar>
<weblogic-enterprise-bean>
<ejb-name>DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</ejb-name>
<message-driven-descriptor>
<pool>
<max-beans-in-free-pool>10</max-beans-in-free-pool>
<initial-beans-in-free-pool>0</initial-beans-in-free-pool>
</pool>
<destination-jndi-name>
idm.jms.clip.WfacClipResponseQueue
</destination-jndi-name>
<connection-factory-jndi-name>
idm.jms.IdmXaJmsQueueConnectionFactory
</connection-factory-jndi-name>
</message-driven-descriptor>
<transaction-descriptor>
<trans-timeout-seconds>
300
</trans-timeout-seconds>
</transaction-descriptor>
<reference-descriptor>
<resource-description>
<res-ref-name>jms/QueueConnectionFactory</res-ref-name>
<jndi-name>idm.jms.IdmXaJmsQueueConnectionFactory</jndi-name>
</resource-description>
</reference-descriptor>
<jndi-name>jms.DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</jndi-name>
</weblogic-enterprise-bean>
</weblogic-ejb-jar>
================weblogic-ejb-jar.xml ENDThe transaction attribute for the MDB is set to 'Required'. Is it possible
that your application logic may process the message successfully even in
case of a transaction roll back? If the transaction rolls back, the message
will be re-delivered.
There is some docs on exactly-once processing which may help
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/ejb/message_beans.html#1147208
--Sathish
<Sony Antony> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
( We are using weblogic 8.1 on Solaris )
We have a bunch of message driven beans with the transaction type as
'Container' and the acknowledge-mode mode as auto-acknowledge. They are
consuming messages from a weblogic Queue ( javax.jms.Queue ). The MBD
container is also weblogic 8.1.
We have 7 instances of the bean consuming messages.
Most of the messages are picked up and processed only once as expected.
But randomly we are seeing that sometimes the same message is delivered
again ( Message.getJmsRedelivered = true ) eventhough it was once picked
up and processed successfully once.
We are completely lost and our production machine is in big trouble as a
result of this.
( Is it possible that weblogic uses unreliable UDP for acknowledging
messages. If yes where do we change this setting )
Any help will be greatly appreciated
Thanks
--sony
================ejb-jar.xml BEGIN
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC '-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise
JavaBeans 2.0//EN' 'http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd'>
<ejb-jar>
<enterprise-beans>
<message-driven>
<description>DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</description>
<ejb-name>DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</ejb-name>
<ejb-class>
com.bellsouth.snt.idm.ejb.wfac.DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB
</ejb-class>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<message-selector>
<![CDATA[ idm_state = 'dsl_updt_dd_post' ]]>
</message-selector>
<acknowledge-mode>auto-acknowledge</acknowledge-mode>
<message-driven-destination>
<destination-type>javax.jms.Queue</destination-type>
</message-driven-destination>
<env-entry>
<env-entry-name>MDB_NAME</env-entry-name>
<env-entry-type>java.lang.String</env-entry-type>
<env-entry-value>dsl_updt_dd_post</env-entry-value>
</env-entry>
<!--security-identity><use-caller-identity/></security-identity-->
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jms/QueueConnectionFactory</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
<res-sharing-scope>Shareable</res-sharing-scope>
</resource-ref>
</message-driven>
</enterprise-beans>
<assembly-descriptor>
<container-transaction>
<method>
<ejb-name>DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</ejb-name>
<method-name>*</method-name>
</method>
<trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
</container-transaction>
</assembly-descriptor>
</ejb-jar>
================ejb-jar.xml END
================weblogic-ejb-jar.xml BEGIN
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE weblogic-ejb-jar PUBLIC '-//BEA Systems, Inc.//DTD WebLogic
8.1.0 EJB//EN'
'http://www.bea.com/servers/wls810/dtd/weblogic-ejb-jar.dtd'>
<weblogic-ejb-jar>
<weblogic-enterprise-bean>
<ejb-name>DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</ejb-name>
<message-driven-descriptor>
<pool>
<max-beans-in-free-pool>10</max-beans-in-free-pool>
<initial-beans-in-free-pool>0</initial-beans-in-free-pool>
</pool>
<destination-jndi-name>
idm.jms.clip.WfacClipResponseQueue
</destination-jndi-name>
<connection-factory-jndi-name>
idm.jms.IdmXaJmsQueueConnectionFactory
</connection-factory-jndi-name>
</message-driven-descriptor>
<transaction-descriptor>
<trans-timeout-seconds>
300
</trans-timeout-seconds>
</transaction-descriptor>
<reference-descriptor>
<resource-description>
<res-ref-name>jms/QueueConnectionFactory</res-ref-name>
<jndi-name>idm.jms.IdmXaJmsQueueConnectionFactory</jndi-name>
</resource-description>
</reference-descriptor>
<jndi-name>jms.DslUpdtDdpostPrcsrMDB</jndi-name>
</weblogic-enterprise-bean>
</weblogic-ejb-jar>
================weblogic-ejb-jar.xml END -
Help Needed in Message Driven Beans
Hi,
I am using JMS and MDB for an asynchronuous communication. I configured the JMS on Sun App server successfully. But I am getting a error message for JNDI Naming. It is not able to find the MDB bean in the JNDI. So it is throwing a NameNotFoundException. Can anybody help me out here. What do I need to put in the Web.xml and Sun-web.xml for getting the reference from JNDI. Please help. My session and Entity beans are working fine. Only having problem in MDB.
Thanks
AmitJust want to get the terminology straight. I assume you mean you have a web component that wants to produce a JMS message that is consumed by a message-driven bean? In that case, what you want to focus on is the name of the queue/topic that will be used. It's not that you're looking up a "message-driven bean" from your client component. You'll need to look up a queue/topic. That same queue/topic will need to be associated with the message-driven bean so that it consumes from the right place.
To set up the client-side configuration, create a resource-env-ref in your web.xml. Then, in the sun-web.xml, map the resource-env-ref to the global JNDI name of the queue/topic JMS resource you created using the admin tools. Your client code will do a lookup under the java:comp/env namespace for the resource-env-ref.
Refer to the JMS portion of the J2EE tutorial for more information :
java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/tutorial/doc/index.html
Kenneth Saks
J2EE SDK Team
SUN Microsystems -
Message driven beans please help
Can anyone please provide me with a simple message driven bean example..
The examples i have found are not working..i dont know anything abt Message driven beans...i just need a sample working code because i need to deploy it on JBOSS using Ant.Here's a simple EJB 3.0 JMS MDB from our glassfish ejb site :
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/ejb/EJB30.html
--ken -
Can you set isolation levels of message-driven bean transactions?
The problem: I have 3 different message-driven beans which each get a different type of message, except for a field that is common to all. That field is used as the primary key of an entity object. The message-driven beans configured to use a container managed transaction. Each message-driven bean, in processing the message, first does a lookup by primary key to see if the object associated with the key exists, and if it does not, it requests the entity's home object to create it. After that, they do further processing. The problem is that sometimes all the beans simultaneously get a message, resulting in each bean checking for the entity object at about the same time, and if they fail to find it (because none of them has created it yet), each creates an object, all with the same primary key. This is not caught until the beans start to complete their onMessage method, which I believe results in the container committing the transaction. One of the transactions will be committed successfully, while the other two will fail, get rolled back, and then be retried with the same message. The second time through, the other beans will find the entity object (since it has been created and committed) and they will complete correctly. In the end, they right thing occurs, except that there is a troubling exception or 2 in the log telling about the constraint violation (with the primary key) and the rollback. If it was just me, that would be fine, but our customer does not like to see exceptions in the log; that indicates to him that something is wrong.
So, I am looking for someway to make sure that the actions of the message-driven beans are serialized. One suggestion from a colleague was to set the isolation level of the transactions being used by the container in processing the message-driven beans' onMessage method. However, the documentation does not mention any way to do this for a message-driven bean. Suggestions?
Is the use of a UserTransaction a better way to do this? If I acquire a UserTransaction within the onMessage method of a message-driven bean, can I set its isolation level? How would this work? When I get a UserTransaction, does each client get a different transaction, or do they all get the same one?(1) The WebLogic JMS "unit-of-order" feature is a heavily adopted feature that was specifically designed to handle similar use cases - see the JMS developer guide for extensive documentation. In your use case, if "key" is used to define UOO, then there's no limit on the number of keys that can be processed concurrently, but messages for any particular key will be processed single-threaded in the order in which they were first submitted.
Note that if you're using distributed destinations, the UOO feature is still fully supported - but the developer and/or administrator needs to decide whether to configure the destination to use "hash" or "path service" based routing (the JMS UOO edoc outlines the trade-offs).
(2) Another alternative is to use a single MDB with max-beans-free-pool that processes all three types (as the other poster suggested). I think this assumes all MDBs run on the same JVM.
(3) Another alternative is to use multiple queues, with a single MDB on each Q. Where some sort of hash algorithm is used to determine which Q is for the key. This approach is a "hand-coded" variant of the approach in (1) with "hash" based routing enabled...
(4) If all MDBs actually do run in the same JVM, a third alternative is to use code the application to use a common lock to protect each key, eg, something like:
// assume MyLock is simply a class with a "reference counter"
// assume some global "staticHM" hash map that is all MDBs can access
onMessage() {
MyLock lock = null;
key= msg.getKey();
synchronized(staticHM) {
lock = staticHM.get();
if (lock = null) {
lock = new lock();
staticHM.put(key, new lock());
lock.incRefCount();
try {
synchronized(lock) {
// only one onMessage will be able to lock a particular key at a time
do your work;
} finally {
synchronized(staticHT) {
if (lock.defRefCount() == 0) staticHM.remove(lock);
if (lock = null) staticHM.put(key);
If multiple threads get a message with the same key, then only one thread at a time will work on the key.
Hope this helps,
Tom -
Intrroduce support Message driven POJO to messaging service
Spring offers a solution Message Driven POJO for asynchronous reception of messages.It acts as message receiver like Message Driven Bean but it does not attach you to EJB container.
It also allows you to take advantage of Dependency Injection.
Could any one guide me how I will design Messaging service which will
take support of message driven POJO implementing a Business interface ?Thanks a ton for active reply.
message reception with MessageListenerAdapter is fine.
I am encounter problem after this message reception..i.e message processing
But as I am framework developer,not a application developer.I can't do
the actual implementation of message processing.It will be done by application
developer.So I need to build sub class object of message processor
depending data provided with message by application developer.
Here is the right challenge.
how can i design message processing infrustructure.
Any help will be highly apprecited. -
How to transaction in the message driven bean?
hello
i write a message driven bean,that monitor the weblogic message queue,when a "Order"
object is witten to the queue,the mdb get it and write it to a entity bean "Orderinfo".all
of above logic is within the "onMessage" method of the mdb.
i want to encapsulate the flow in a transaction,see my code snippet of the onMessage
method:
ObjectMessage objMsg = (ObjectMessage) msg;
OrderVO orderVO = (OrderVO) objMsg.getObject();
System.out.println(orderVO.booklist);
OrderinfoHome orderinfoHome = (OrderinfoHome) ctx.lookup(
"java:/comp/env/orderinfo");
Orderinfo orderinfo = orderinfoHome.create(orderVO.orderID);
orderinfo.setAddress(orderVO.address);
orderinfo.setCustname(orderVO.custName);
orderinfo.setEmail(orderVO.email);
orderinfo.setBooklist(orderVO.booklist);
orderinfo.setPrice(new BigDecimal(orderVO.price));
and deploy descriptor snippet(ejb-jar.xml):
<assembly-descriptor>
<container-transaction>
<method>
<ejb-name>orderMDB</ejb-name>
<method-name>*</method-name>
</method>
<trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
</container-transaction>
</assembly-descriptor>
i think during this transaction,there are two action:geting the object from the
queue and saving it to entity bean.in order to test the transaction,i modify the
jndi name of entity bean in the code to a WRONG one.redeploy my program,and send
a message to the queue,the mdb is activated,then the exception is thrown because
of the wrong jndi name.after that,i check the message queue,find that it is empty.why?i
think if the second action of the transaction is fail,the transaction should roll
back,the message should be send BACK to the queue.
i also ty to use the "javax.transaction.UserTransaction" in the onMessage method,but
the follwing exception is thrown:
javax.transaction.NotSupportedException: Another transaction is associated with
this thread.................................
who can help me,if any wrong with me,and how to use the transaction with the message
driven bean?
thank you.
The transaction should rollback if the MDB throws an
exception. Try changing your MDB code to
call "setRollbackOnly()" on the EJB
context (instead of throwing an exception) to see
if that works. If calling "setRollbackOnly()" fixes
the problem - then please contact customer support
and report a bug.
zbcong wrote:
> hello
>
> i write a message driven bean,that monitor the weblogic message queue,when a "Order"
> object is witten to the queue,the mdb get it and write it to a entity bean "Orderinfo".all
> of above logic is within the "onMessage" method of the mdb.
> i want to encapsulate the flow in a transaction,see my code snippet of the onMessage
> method:
>
>
> ObjectMessage objMsg = (ObjectMessage) msg;
> OrderVO orderVO = (OrderVO) objMsg.getObject();
> System.out.println(orderVO.booklist);
> OrderinfoHome orderinfoHome = (OrderinfoHome) ctx.lookup(
> "java:/comp/env/orderinfo");
> Orderinfo orderinfo = orderinfoHome.create(orderVO.orderID);
> orderinfo.setAddress(orderVO.address);
> orderinfo.setCustname(orderVO.custName);
> orderinfo.setEmail(orderVO.email);
> orderinfo.setBooklist(orderVO.booklist);
> orderinfo.setPrice(new BigDecimal(orderVO.price));
>
>
> and deploy descriptor snippet(ejb-jar.xml):
>
>
> <assembly-descriptor>
> ............
> ...........
>
> <container-transaction>
> <method>
> <ejb-name>orderMDB</ejb-name>
> <method-name>*</method-name>
> </method>
> <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
> </container-transaction>
> </assembly-descriptor>
>
>
> i think during this transaction,there are two action:geting the object from the
> queue and saving it to entity bean.in order to test the transaction,i modify the
> jndi name of entity bean in the code to a WRONG one.redeploy my program,and send
> a message to the queue,the mdb is activated,then the exception is thrown because
> of the wrong jndi name.after that,i check the message queue,find that it is empty.why?i
> think if the second action of the transaction is fail,the transaction should roll
> back,the message should be send BACK to the queue.
>
> i also ty to use the "javax.transaction.UserTransaction" in the onMessage method,but
> the follwing exception is thrown:
>
> javax.transaction.NotSupportedException: Another transaction is associated with
> this thread.................................
>
> who can help me,if any wrong with me,and how to use the transaction with the message
> driven bean?
>
> thank you.
>
>
-
Message Driven Bean and transaction handling
We are using container managed transactions with MDB's running on OC4J version 10.1.2. We have two database serveres, both running Oracle 10g.
The MDB consume messages from the AQ-database through JMS (connected to a JDBC datasource registered as "jdbc/OracleAQDS").
The MDB onMessage() code update the second database, using a JDBC datasource registered as "jdbc/OracleDBDS".
We need atomic behaviour - if the MDB enforce a roll-back we want the updates aginst the second database to be rolled-back as well.
(1) Should we use XA-datasources since AQ and DB runs on two different servers or do the OC4J container "magically" provide two-phase-commit for us?
(2) If the MDB does a roll-back we would like to add an error record to a database table. Can we configure a third datasource and prevent if from beeing part of the container managed MDB roll-back?
(3) When the MDB force a roll-back, is there some way for us to override the retry-delay in our Java code? If we catch certain errors during processing in onMessage we know that it is not necessary to retry for at least one hour (while less severe errors should be retried in just seconds).{color:#008000}Hi Friends,
Thought of updating the answers for my questions in case somebody else would find it helpful.
{color}
{color:#999999}{color:#00ccff}I'm trying to make message driven bean and use the OnListener method.
But since I'm doing this for the first time I have very limited knowledge.
The following are my doubts :
1. Should I have a main function while using the MDB?{color}
{color:#008000} There is no need for any main function.{color}
{color:#00ccff}2. Is it mandatory to have JNDI setup done?
{color} {color}{color:#008000} There is no need for any JNDI setup done. But you need to configure the details on the
Websphere by creating valid entries inside Resources namely -
Queue Connection Factory, Queues and Listener Ports under the server.
Thanks,
Arun Prithviraj{color} -
WebLogic 10 and EJB 3.0 for Message Driven Bean
Hi,
I am trying to deploy Message Driven Bean using EJB3.0 on weblogic 10. I am using annotations and don't want to use deployment descriptors.
The Bean class:
CalculatorBean.java
import javax.ejb.*;
import javax.jms.*;
import java.sql.Timestamp;
import java.util.StringTokenizer;
@MessageDriven(activationConfig =
@ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName="destinationType",
propertyValue="javax.jms.Queue"),
@ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName="destination",
propertyValue="queue/mdb")
public class CalculatorBean implements MessageListener {
public void onMessage (Message msg) {
TextMessage tmsg=null;
try {
if (msg instanceof TextMessage) {
tmsg = (TextMessage) msg;
System.out.println
("MESSAGE BEAN1: Message received: "
+ tmsg.getText());
} else {
System.out.println
("Message of wrong type1: "
+ msg.getClass().getName());
catch (JMSException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
catch (Throwable te) {
te.printStackTrace();
My client:
import javax.naming.*;
import javax.naming.InitialContext;
import java.text.*;
import javax.jms.*;
public class MsgClient {
public static void main(String args[])
QueueConnection cnn=null;
QueueSender sender=null;
QueueSession sess=null;
Queue queue=null;
try {
java.util.Properties p = new java.util.Properties();
p.put("java.naming.factory.initial","weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory");
p.put("java.naming.provider.url","t3://10.6.74.79:7001");
Context ctx=new InitialContext(p);
//InitialContext ctx=new InitialContext(p);
queue = (Queue)ctx.lookup("queue/mdb");
QueueConnectionFactory factory = (QueueConnectionFactory)ctx.lookup("ConnectionFactory");
cnn = factory.createQueueConnection();
sess= cnn.createQueueSession(false, QueueSession.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
sender = sess.createSender(queue);
TextMessage message = sess.createTextMessage();
message.setText("This is message by Gurumurthy" );
System.out.println("Sending message: " +message.getText());
sender.send(message);
sess.close();
catch (Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
I am compiling and creating jar file for this class. Then I am creating a .ear file for this.
The meta-inf/application.xml contains the following:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<application xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee" version="1.4"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com /xml/ns/j2ee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/application_1_4.xsd">
<display-name>MDBWorking1</display-name>
<description>Application description</description>
<module>
<ejb>MDBWorking1.jar</ejb>
</module>
</application>
I don't want to use deployment descriptor (ejb-jar.xml or weblogic-ejb-jar-xml), because I want to utilize the annotation feature of EJB3.0
So, after creating the .ear file for this, and try to deploy on weblogic 10, I get the following error:
An error occurred during activation of changes, please see the log for details.
Exception preparing module: EJBModule(MDBWorking1.jar) Unable to deploy EJB: CalculatorBean from MDBWorking1.jar: [EJB:011113]Error: The Message Driven Bean 'CalculatorBean(Application: MDBWorking1, EJBComponent: MDBWorking1.jar)', does not have a message destination configured. The message destination must be set using a message-destination-link, destination-resource-link, destination-jndi-name or a resource-adapter-jndi-name.
Substituted for missing class [EJB - 11113]Error: The Message Driven Bean 'CalculatorBean(Application: MDBWorking1, EJBComponent: MDBWorking1.jar)', does not have a message destination configured. The message destination must be set using a message-destination-link, destination-resource-link, destination-jndi-name or a resource-adapter-jndi-name.
How to solve this?
Note:
I don't want to use Deployment Descriptor and all I want to use is EJB3.0's annotation feature.
Thanks,
GuruDear gurubbc,
I don't know if it still matters to you but you can use the javax.ejb.MessageDriven annotation to point your bean on your queue. I had the same issue like you but i could not solve it properly by switchihg to weblogic.ejb.MessageDriven.
Use the following annotation and it should work out:
@MessageDriven
(mappedName = "queue/mdb",
name = "CalculatorBean",
activationConfig = {
@ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destinationType", propertyValue = "javax.jms.Queue")
Here you can see that the mappedName is the JNDI name of the queue you are trying to connect to. The name is the name for your Bean, and the only property passed is the destination type.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Istvan -
JBoss message driven bean calling a session bean
Hi guys, can you please help me? I want my mdb to call my session bean....can you provide me some examples of ejb-jar.xml and jboss.xml with regards to this configuration....thanks...im creating my deployment descriptors manually
Here is a little example, I hope it will help you.
ejb-jar.xml
=============================================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd">
<ejb-jar >
<enterprise-beans>
<!-- Session Beans -->
<session >
<display-name>TestSessionEJB</display-name>
<ejb-name>TestSession</ejb-name>
<home>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionHome</home>
<remote>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSession</remote>
<local-home>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionLocalHome</local-home>
<local>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionLocal</local>
<ejb-class>mdbtest.session.TestSessionEJB</ejb-class>
<session-type>Stateless</session-type>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
... </session>
<!-- Message Driven Beans -->
<message-driven >
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<display-name>TestMessageEJB</display-name>
<ejb-name>TestMessage</ejb-name>
<ejb-class>mdbtest.message.TestMessageEJB</ejb-class>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<message-selector></message-selector>
<acknowledge-mode>Auto-acknowledge</acknowledge-mode>
<message-driven-destination>
<destination-type>javax.jms.Queue</destination-type>
<subscription-durability>NonDurable</subscription-durability>
</message-driven-destination>
<ejb-local-ref >
<ejb-ref-name>ejb/TestEjb</ejb-ref-name>
<ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
<local-home>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionLocalHome</local-home>
<local>mdbtest.interfaces.TestSessionLocal</local>
<ejb-link>TestSession</ejb-link>
</ejb-local-ref>
</message-driven>
</enterprise-beans>
</ejb-jar>
jboss.xml:
=============================================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE jboss PUBLIC "-//JBoss//DTD JBOSS 3.0//EN" "http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss_3_0.dtd">
<jboss>
<enterprise-beans>
<session>
<ejb-name>TestSession</ejb-name>
<jndi-name>ejb/MdbTest/TestSession</jndi-name>
<local-jndi-name>TestSessionLocal</local-jndi-name>
<configuration-name>Standard Stateless SessionBean</configuration-name>
</session>
<message-driven>
<ejb-name>TestMessage</ejb-name>
<destination-jndi-name>queue/MyTestQueue</destination-jndi-name>
<configuration-name>Standard Message Driven Bean</configuration-name>
</message-driven>
</enterprise-beans>
<resource-managers>
</resource-managers>
</jboss> -
Message Driven Bean: problem with @RunAs annotation
I am having a problem using the @RunAs annotation in a message driven bean.
I would like the code in my onMessage() method to be executed with a specific role/user, so I want to use the @RunAs annotation to achieve this.
I am running weblogic 10.0.
I have created the following in weblogic console:
- Group "TestGroup"
- User "TestUser", member of "TestGroup"
- Global Role "TestRole", role condition: "Group : TestGroup"
The MDB:
package be.cegeka.test.mdb;
import javax.annotation.Resource;
import javax.annotation.security.RunAs;
import javax.ejb.ActivationConfigProperty;
import javax.ejb.MessageDriven;
import javax.ejb.MessageDrivenContext;
import javax.jms.Message;
import javax.jms.MessageListener;
@MessageDriven(
mappedName = "testQueue",
name = "TestMDB",
activationConfig = {
@ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destinationType", propertyValue = "javax.jms.Queue")
@RunAs("TestRole")
public class TestMDB implements MessageListener {
@Resource
private MessageDrivenContext mdContext;
* {@inheritDoc}}
public void onMessage(Message msg) {
System.out.println("Handling message for user "
+ mdContext.getCallerPrincipal().getName());
}[u]The ejb-jar.xml file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ejb-jar xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/ejb-jar_3_0.xsd"
version="3.0">
<assembly-descriptor>
<security-role>
<description>
Test Role.
</description>
<role-name>TestRole</role-name>
</security-role>
</assembly-descriptor>
</ejb-jar>
The weblogic-ejb-jar.xml file:
<weblogic-ejb-jar xmlns="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/10.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/10.0 http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/10.0/weblogic-ejb-jar.xsd">
<security-role-assignment>
<role-name>TestRole</role-name>
<principal-name>TestUser</principal-name>
</security-role-assignment>
</weblogic-ejb-jar>I would have thought that the onMessage of the MDB would print "Handling message for user TestUser", but instead it prints "Handling message for user <anonymous>".
It seems as though the @RunAs annotation has no effect. Although I specified the role TestRole (mapped to the user TestUser), the code still seems to be executed by user anonymous.
Am I missing something?
Any help would be much appreciated! I've been looking at this poblem for quite a while now.Both beans (the MDB on WLS 10 and the session bean on WLS 8.1) use container managed transactions.
For the MDB I do not explicitly set the transaction attributes, so it should default to container managed transactions.
For the stateless session bean I have specified the following in the ejb-jar.xml file:
<ejb-jar>
<display-name>Weblogic8Service</display-name>
<enterprise-beans>
<session>
<ejb-name>Weblogic8Service</ejb-name>
<home>be.cegeka.rszv.test.session.Weblogic8ServiceRemoteHome</home>
<remote>be.cegeka.rszv.test.session.Weblogic8ServiceRemote</remote>
<ejb-class>be.cegeka.rszv.test.session.Weblogic8ServiceBean</ejb-class>
<session-type>Stateless</session-type>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
</session>
</enterprise-beans>
<assembly-descriptor>
<container-transaction>
<method>
<ejb-name>Weblogic8Service</ejb-name>
<method-name>*</method-name>
</method>
<trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
</container-transaction>
</assembly-descriptor>
</ejb-jar>So as far as I understand it the transaction starts at the MDB (upon receival of a message). The transaction for the remote call to the stateless session bean (in the onMessage() of the MDB) is included in the transaction of the MDB and gets committed when the onMessage() method finishes and the transaction of the MDB itself gets committed.
Correct me if I'm wrong here. -
Exception in setting up message-driven bean container: [MQJMS1010: not impl
Problem
=======
We are trying to configure and deploy a Message Driven
Bean to listen on a WebSphere MQ queue, using LDAP to
share knowledge of the Queue & Connection Factory.
But when we start the Sun One domain we get an exception:
javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented
(see log file at the end of this email)
Can anybody help please ?
The configuration of the various components are listed
below:
WebSphere MQ Configuration
==========================
Version 5.3
Queue Manager
QM_Test
Queues
PATH_MFP.Case.Request
Queue Type: Local
Channels
Channel_Test
Channel Type: Server Connection
Protocol Type: TCP/IP
LDAP configuration
==================
ldap://localhost/o=mqtest
cn=MFP_LOCAL_Factory
javaFactory=com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactoryFactory
javaClassName=com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactory
javaReferenceAddress=#3#QMGR#QM_Test
javaReferenceAddress=#6#CHAN#Channel_Test
javaReferenceAddress=#14#TM#SYSTEM.DEFAULT.MODEL.QUEUE
cn=MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue
javaFactory=com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueFactory
javaClassName=com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueue
javaReferenceAddress=#9#QU#PATH_MFP.Case.Request
javaReferenceAddress=#10#QMGR#QM_Test
EJB configuration
=================
ejb-jar.xml
<message-driven>
<display-name>ServerMessageDrivenBean</display-name>
<ejb-name>ServerMessageDrivenBean</ejb-name>
<ejb-class>nz.co.acc.emi.server.connector.mdb.ServerMessageDrivenBean</ejb-class>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<message-driven-destination>
<destination-type>javax.jms.Queue</destination-type>
</message-driven-destination>
</message-driven>
sun-ejb-jar.xml
<ejb>
<ejb-name>ServerMessageDrivenBean</ejb-name>
<jndi-name>MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue</jndi-name>
<mdb-connection-factory>
<jndi-name>MFP_LOCAL_Factory</jndi-name>
</mdb-connection-factory>
</ejb>
Sun One configuration
=====================
MFPProcessing: JNDI: External Resources
MFP_LOCAL_Factory Enabled javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory
JNDI Name: MFP_LOCAL_Factory
Resource Type: javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory
JNDI Lookup: cn=MFP_LOCAL_Factory
Factoryclass: com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
Properties:
java.naming.provider.url ldap://localhost:389/o=mqtest
java.naming.security.authentication none
MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue Enabled javax.jms.Queue
JNDI Name: MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue
Resource Type: javax.jms.Queue
JNDI Lookup: cn=MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue
Factoryclass: com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
Properties:
java.naming.provider.url ldap://localhost:389/o=mqtest
server.xml
<mdb-container steady-pool-size="10" pool-resize-quantity="2" max-pool-size="60" idle-timeout-in-seconds="600" monitoring-enabled="true" log-level="FINEST" />
<jms-service port="1240" admin-user-name="admin" admin-password="admin" init-timeout-in-seconds="30" enabled="true" log-level="FINE" />
Sun One log file
================
server.log
[01/Mar/2004:10:06:48] INFO ( 657): CORE1116: Sun ONE Application Server 7.0.0_01
[01/Mar/2004:10:06:51] INFO ( 657): CORE5076: Using [Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM, Version 1.4.2_01] from [Sun Microsystems Inc.]
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:09] INFO ( 657): JMS5023: JMS service successfully started. Instance Name = domain1_MFPProcessing, Home = [C:/Sun/AppServer7/imq/bin].
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:13] INFO ( 657): JTS5014: Recoverable JTS instance, serverId = [100]
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:14] INFO ( 657): RAR5060: Install JDBC Datasources ...
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:14] INFO ( 657): RAR5059: Binding [JDBC DataSource Name: jdbc/MfsDataSourceJConn, Pool Name: MFSConnectionPool]
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:15] INFO ( 657): JMS5015: Install JMS resources ...
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:47] WARNING ( 657): [EntityContainer] Created EntityContainer....
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:49] INFO ( 657): LDR5010: All ejb(s) of [mfs] loaded successfully!
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:52] INFO ( 657): MDB00044: Deploying message-driven bean [emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean], consuming from [MFP_LOCAL_Case_Request_Queue]
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:52] FINE ( 657): Messages delivery is part of a container-managed tx
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:52] FINE ( 657): emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean:reconnect-delay-in-seconds=60, reconnect-max-retries=60, reconnect-enabled=true
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:53] INFO ( 657): MDB00028: [emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean]: Message-driven bean container using external connection factory object: [com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactory]
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean: Setting message-driven bean pool max-pool-size=60, steady-pool-size=10, pool-resize-quantity=2, idle-timeout-in-seconds=600
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Initializing server session factory
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Created server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): before wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] INFO ( 657): MDB0001: Create message-driven bean pool with maximum pool size [60], bean idle timeout [600] seconds
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): MDB00030: [emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean]: Exception in setting up message-driven bean container: [MQJMS1010: not implemented]
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): MDB00018: [emi:ServerMessageDrivenBean]: Closing message-driven bean container connection
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] WARNING ( 657): [AbstractPool]: Cancelled pool timer task at: Mon Mar 01 10:07:55 NZDT 2004
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@2d5534
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@127d15e
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@11576d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@34d75f
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@12297d7
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@e4776b
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@1ecfeb
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@15c458c
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@da1515
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): Thread[main,5,main]: in cleanup() ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINE ( 657): Destroyed server session: com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): MDB00017: [ServerMessageDrivenBean]: Exception in creating message-driven bean container: [javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented]
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] FINEST ( 657): run(): after wait ... com.iplanet.ias.ejb.containers.IASServerSessionImpl@19e3e24
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): javax.jms.JMSException
javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented
at com.ibm.mq.jms.services.ConfigEnvironment.newException(ConfigEnvironment.java:418)
at com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnection.createConnectionConsumer(MQQueueConnection.java:602)
at com.sun.enterprise.jms.ConnectionWrapperBase.createConnectionConsumer(ConnectionWrapperBase.java:151)
at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanHelperQueueImpl.doSetup(MessageBeanHelperQueueImpl.java:67)
at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanHelperBase.setup(MessageBeanHelperBase.java:419)
at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanContainer.<init>(MessageBeanContainer.java:206)
at com.sun.ejb.containers.ContainerFactoryImpl.createContainer(ContainerFactoryImpl.java:173)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.AbstractLoader.loadEjbs(AbstractLoader.java:345)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationLoader.load(ApplicationLoader.java:81)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.AbstractManager.load(AbstractManager.java:134)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationLifecycle.onStartup(ApplicationLifecycle.java:168)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationServer.onStartup(ApplicationServer.java:269)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.J2EERunner.confPostInit(J2EERunner.java:162)
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): EJB5090: Exception in creating EJB container [javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented]
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): appId=emi moduleName=emiEjb_jar ejbName=ServerMessageDrivenBean
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] SEVERE ( 657): LDR5004: UnExpected error occured while creating ejb container
javax.jms.JMSException: MQJMS1010: not implemented
at com.ibm.mq.jms.services.ConfigEnvironment.newException(ConfigEnvironment.java:418)
at com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnection.createConnectionConsumer(MQQueueConnection.java:602)
at com.sun.enterprise.jms.ConnectionWrapperBase.createConnectionConsumer(ConnectionWrapperBase.java:151)
at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanHelperQueueImpl.doSetup(MessageBeanHelperQueueImpl.java:67)
at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanHelperBase.setup(MessageBeanHelperBase.java:419)
at com.sun.ejb.containers.MessageBeanContainer.<init>(MessageBeanContainer.java:206)
at com.sun.ejb.containers.ContainerFactoryImpl.createContainer(ContainerFactoryImpl.java:173)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.AbstractLoader.loadEjbs(AbstractLoader.java:345)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationLoader.load(ApplicationLoader.java:81)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.AbstractManager.load(AbstractManager.java:134)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationLifecycle.onStartup(ApplicationLifecycle.java:168)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.ApplicationServer.onStartup(ApplicationServer.java:269)
at com.iplanet.ias.server.J2EERunner.confPostInit(J2EERunner.java:162)
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] WARNING ( 657): CORE5021: Application NOT loaded: [emi]
[01/Mar/2004:10:07:55] INFO ( 657): WEB0100: Loading web module [mfs:mfs.war] in virtual server [MFPProcessing] at [mfs]
[01/Mar/2004:10:08:31] INFO ( 657): HTTP3072: HTTP listener http-listener-1 [http://ch042dysz0405:1080] ready to accept requests
[01/Mar/2004:10:08:31] INFO ( 657): CORE3274: successful server startup
[01/Mar/2004:10:08:33] INFO ( 657): CORE5053: Application onReady complete.Hi,
You have not created the jms destination queue object
jms/Warehouse
Your server logs says it cannot find the destination queue object.It has got nothing to do with jndi name of your bean
Create jms destination queue object using
asadmin>create-jms-resource instance <instance_name> resourcetype javax.jms.Queue --property imqDestinationName=<NAme> jms/Warehouse
Then use list-jms-resources <instance_name> to
find if jms/Warehouse destionation queue object has been created.
Get back in case of any issues -
Error when ESR starts - Cannot activate endpoint for message-driven bean
Hi, as already posted on ERROR WHEN START ESR: Cannot activate endpoint for message-driven bean
after an upgrade to PI 7.1 SP11, we got the following error when trying to start ESR, other applications work well:
Application cannot be started!
Details: com.sap.engine.services.deploy.container.DeploymentException: Cannot activate endpoint for message-driven bean sap.com/com.sap.xi.repositoryxml|com.sap.xpi.ibrep.server.jarxml|WorkspaceSyncMessageReciverMDB
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.container.ContainerInterfaceImpl$Actions.perform(ContainerInterfaceImpl.java:893)
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.container.ContainerInterfaceImpl.prepareStart(ContainerInterfaceImpl.java:425)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.application.StartTransaction.prepareCommon(StartTransaction.java:219)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.application.StartTransaction.prepare(StartTransaction.java:179)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.application.ApplicationTransaction.makeAllPhasesOnOneServer(ApplicationTransaction.java:419)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.application.ParallelAdapter.makeAllPhasesImpl(ParallelAdapter.java:498)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.application.StartTransaction.makeAllPhasesImpl(StartTransaction.java:554)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.application.ParallelAdapter.runInTheSameThread(ParallelAdapter.java:251)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.application.ParallelAdapter.makeAllPhasesAndWait(ParallelAdapter.java:392)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.DeployServiceImpl.startApplicationAndWait(DeployServiceImpl.java:3422)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.DeployServiceImpl.startApplicationAndWait(DeployServiceImpl.java:3408)
at com.sap.engine.services.deploy.server.DeployCommunicatorImpl.startApplicationAndWait(DeployCommunicatorImpl.java:749)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.deploy.impl.ApplicationManager.start(ApplicationManager.java:180)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.deploy.impl.ApplicationManager.analyseAppStatusMode(ApplicationManager.java:288)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.DeployContext.startLazyApplication(DeployContext.java:334)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.filters.ApplicationSelector.process(ApplicationSelector.java:103)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:71)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.WebContainerInvoker.process(WebContainerInvoker.java:67)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.HostFilter.process(HostFilter.java:9)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:71)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.ResponseLogWriter.process(ResponseLogWriter.java:60)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.HostFilter.process(HostFilter.java:9)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:71)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.DefineHostFilter.process(DefineHostFilter.java:27)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.ServerFilter.process(ServerFilter.java:12)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:71)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.MonitoringFilter.process(MonitoringFilter.java:29)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.ServerFilter.process(ServerFilter.java:12)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:71)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.chainedRequest(Processor.java:295)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor$FCAProcessorThread.run(Processor.java:222)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:152)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:250)
Caused by: com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.container.ActionException: Cannot activate endpoint for message-driven bean sap.com/com.sap.xi.repositoryxml|com.sap.xpi.ibrep.server.jarxml|WorkspaceSyncMessageReciverMDB
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Actions_MDBEndpointActivation.perform(Actions_MDBEndpointActivation.java:103)
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.container.CompositeAction.perform(CompositeAction.java:81)
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.container.ApplicationStarter.perform(ApplicationStarter.java:59)
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.container.ContainerInterfaceImpl$Actions.perform(ContainerInterfaceImpl.java:887)
... 34 more
Caused by: javax.resource.NotSupportedException: javax.resource.spi.UnavailableException: Could not activate endpoint for the configured number of attempts
at com.sap.jms.resourceadapter.ResourceAdapterImpl.endpointActivation(ResourceAdapterImpl.java:113)
at com.sap.engine.services.connector.jca15.EndpointActivationImpl.activateEndpoint(EndpointActivationImpl.java:451)
at com.sap.engine.services.connector.jca15.EndpointActivationImpl.findResourceAdapterByName(EndpointActivationImpl.java:154)
at com.sap.engine.services.connector.jca15.EndpointActivationImpl.findAdapter(EndpointActivationImpl.java:85)
at com.sap.engine.services.connector.jca15.EndpointActivationImpl.activateEndpoint(EndpointActivationImpl.java:58)
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Actions_MDBEndpointActivation.perform(Actions_MDBEndpointActivation.java:95)
... 37 more
Caused by: javax.resource.spi.UnavailableException: Could not activate endpoint for the configured number of attempts
at com.sap.jms.resourceadapter.RaActivation.activate(RaActivation.java:161)
at com.sap.jms.resourceadapter.ResourceAdapterImpl.endpointActivation(ResourceAdapterImpl.java:101)
... 42 more
Caused by: javax.resource.spi.UnavailableException: The destination jms/queue/xi/repository/SWCVSync cannot be looked up. Last attempt performed : jms_vendor_queues_global/jms/queue/xi/repository/SWCVSync
at com.sap.jms.resourceadapter.RaActivation.setupDestination(RaActivation.java:369)
at com.sap.jms.resourceadapter.RaActivation.activate(RaActivation.java:128)
... 43 more
Caused by: com.sap.engine.services.jndi.persistent.exceptions.NameNotFoundException: Object not found in lookup of SWCVSync.
at com.sap.engine.services.jndi.implserver.ServerContextImpl.lookup(ServerContextImpl.java:584)
at com.sap.engine.services.jndi.implclient.ClientContext.lookup(ClientContext.java:343)
at com.sap.engine.services.jndi.implclient.ClientContext.lookup(ClientContext.java:637)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:351)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:351)
at com.sap.jms.resourceadapter.RaActivation.setupDestination(RaActivation.java:367)
... 44 more
Thanks.Guys,
I have deployed the below components and after this repository could not be started which gives the below error.
1000.7.11.10.18.20130529165100
SAP AG
sap.com
SAP_XIAF
1000.7.11.10.11.20130529165100
SAP AG
sap.com
SAP_XIESR
1000.7.11.10.15.20130529165100
SAP AG
sap.com
SAP_XITOOL
We have the same issue. Still the Restart did not solve ths issue.
Can anybody help? We are not able to start the XI Repository.
Our PI components are as below
com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.refmatcher.EJBResolvingException: Cannot start applicationsap.com/com.sap.xi.repository; nested exception is: java.rmi.RemoteException: [ERROR
CODE DPL.DS.6125] Error occurred while starting application locally and wait.; nested exception is:
com.sap.engine.services.deploy.container.DeploymentException: Cannot activate endpoint for message-driven bean sap.com/com.sap.xi.repository*xml|com.sap.xpi.ibrep.server.jar*xm
l|CacheRefreshMDB^M
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.DefaultContainerRepository.startApp(DefaultContainerRepository.java:315)^M
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.DefaultContainerRepository.getEnterpriseBeanContainer(DefaultContainerRepository.java:106)^M
at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.DefaultRemoteObjectFactory.resolveReference(DefaultRemoteObjectFactory.java:55)^M
1000.7.11.10.6.20121015232500
SAP AG
sap.com
MESSAGING
Regards
Omkar -
JNDI Naming Problem accessing Session Bean from Message Driven Bean
Hi,
I am facing a very strange problem in JNDI look up accessing a Session Bean from a Message Driven Bean. I have a session fa�ade bean(Remote Bean) which is being called from Struts Action class getting the home reference from the ServiceLocator (I have implemented ServiceLocator pattern to obtain JNDI reference for all EJBs). When I am calling the session fa�ade EJB from the Struts Action class everything is working fine.
But when I am trying to call the same EJB from my Message Driven Bean, I am getting a JNDI exception (NameNotFoundException - No Object bound to name �java:comp/env/ejb/EJBJNDIName�). I am trying to get the remote reference from the same ServiceLocator which is successfully providing me a reference while calling from the struts action class. But the same ServiceLocator is not able to provide me a reference while calling from the Message Driven Bean. If I use the JNDI name directly like �EJBJNDIName� in the lookup it is working fine. The lookup for the name is working fine and I am able to call the Session Fa�ade bean with that reference.
I am really not sure what exactly the problem is. If I have any problem in the ServiceLocator, it should have given me the same error while calling from Struts Action class. But it is working fine with the full name �java:comp/env/ejb/EJBJNDIName� calling from the struts action class. I am not sure whether Message Driven Bean has something to do with it. Why I am not able to get a reference of the EJB with the full name? Please Help.
Thanks
AmitHi Bhagya,
Thanks for your response. I think from EJB container we can call Local EJBs with the full JNDI name. The session facade bean which is being called is a remote bean. From the session facade bean I am calling a local stateless session bean for database access. I am getting the reference of the local EJB from my session facade bean with full JNDI name "java:comp/env/ejb/EJBJNDIName". It is working fine with out any problem. My servicelocator is able to provide me the reference of the local EJB from the session facade remote bean with Full JNDI name. I am only having this problem calling from the MDB. I am really not sure whether what is causing it?
Thanks
Amit -
Usage of Apache Beehive JMS control inside Message Driven Bean
Hi,
I am developing a j2ee application using weblogic workshop 10.3. This application contains the following three projects.
- J2EE Utility Project
- Message Driven Bean Project
- Ear Project
In the Utility project I have created one apache beehive jms control. I am using this control inside the message driven bean application. I haven't got any issues during the development and deployment phase with the beehive control. But during runtime the apache beehive jms control is not getting instantiated and the mdb application is throwing the null pointer exception when the EJB container try to execute the methods on the control instance. I have used the declarative programming model to create the control instance inside the mdb application.
I am using the weblogic 10.3 server for testing and I have created the 10.3 weblogic+workshop domain. By default it has the beehive libraries deployed.
Can somebody help me out to resolve this issue?
Regards,
BpYou can get the message directly with getText() method. Following is the snippet of code.
if (aMsg instanceof TextMessage) {
TextMessage msg = (TextMessage) aMsg;
String testMessage = msg.getText());
Kishore.
Maybe you are looking for
-
My built in webcam won't turn on
my built in webcam will not turn on
-
How do I determine the firmware I have installed on my Zen V Pl
I need to know my Zen V Plus firmware prior to usig the Travel Sound. I have searched - but cannot figure out how to determine this. I did just purchase the Zen V Plus from Creative, it is a rebuilt item, if that hel ps. Thanks for your assistance.
-
I have a problem with Flash converting. I have a one swf file that will not open in Adobe Flash. The problem , however, is the following . I want to edit swf file and to access the fla file , I use Sothink decompiler where I convert the same Swf file
-
Delivery tolerance (based on the delivery date)
Dear All How to maintain delivery tolerance (based on the delivery date) in Purchasing Order Would you help me, please thanks imron
-
I am getting an error that the download has a virus when attempting to install
I uninstall Firefox due to a problem with the browser showing websites incorrectly after a windows reboot. I attempted then to download firefox from the firefox website and each time the antivirus software detect a virus and remove the installer