Help Rendering and Quality

I have 2 problems. The first is when I play my video it says it's not realtime and I've tried all sorts of things to try and fix it. My second problem is that when I'm playing my video it's clear and crisp but when I render it and play it the video is a terrible quality and very small.

FAQ: How do I import xyz format files?
FAQ:How do I convert my files?
Cheers
Eddie
PremiereProPedia (
RSS feed)
- Over 300 frequently answered questions
- Over 250 free tutorials
- Maintained by editors like
you
Forum FAQ

Similar Messages

JUST PROBLEMS rendering and quality issues

Hey, all.
I've been posting here a few months and recently got a mac and fcp. I've been editing for over ten years on velocity and avid. Had great luck at figuring stuff out with manuals and the threads and freinds. But I'm at a total loss trying to figure out how to squeeze a decent title out of FCP. I've gone through the manuals, checked the settings, tried many workarounds and options, and I still get the jagged, shimmery text, especially on moves. I'm not doing anything special -- just a lame title. These titles look amatuerish -- quite frankly the kind of work I thought the amatuers were doing on FCP all the years I avoided it along with premeire -- wedding video crap systems. Okay, fcp and premeire have come a long way. AND I WANT TO LOVE THIS THING! BUT man, why is it so crazy just to get a right combo of settings to churn out a stupid title? Rendering makes things look worse. I've done everything! If someone is in Orange County/Anaheim and can drop by, I'll pay you! Seriously, this is terrible.
It seems like anybody struggling with this jagged title stuff on these posts never really solves anyting except for getting slightly better results and just plainly settling for less. I know I must be doing something wrong, but what???
Sorry about the rant. call me 714 280-8201
-C

Thanks for responding: Right now I'm using after effects. It's a little better. Ever since I've started on a mac I've had this issue. Yes, PC background.
Anyway, I've tried many approaches, Titler, motion, png alpha files with motion moves, boris titler -- all with low quality results. Everything is played back on a monitor, one via component, the other via sdi.
my timeline is dvcpro50, all the settings I know about are set to best. Fields set to none. I forgot all the other stuff I looked at, checked and tried. I think there's a fundamental thing I don't understand about rendering. The sequence rendering drop down menu has about 30 options, that are just foreign to me. I better spend more time with the manual. But I'm selecting render all with all the options checked for rendering. I get a grey bar over the timeline suggesting to me that everything is rendered. It's got to be user error combined with a really convolutive way to set up projects and workflow by fcp.
thanks, chase

After Effects Rendering and Quality

I have 2 problems. The first is when I play my video it says it's not realtime and I've tried all sorts of things to try and fix it. My second problem is that when I'm playing my video it's clear and crisp but when I render it and play it the video is a terrible quality and very small.

If you look under the composition preview panel (in normal workstation) there are some options about playback like how large (the percentage drop down box) and a little more to the left there is one that says different resolution presets (half, full). That allows you to render and play back faster (if you use a lower setting).
If this was not what you were trying to do there are alot of other options that you can change after effects with if you click "edit", "Preferences", then the topic you need.

HELP: Premiere Pro CC not using all CPU and RAM during rendering and export

Hello,
I am using Premiere Pro CC on a Windows 7. My timeline is quite simple with two videos, one with the movie (mpeg) and the other with the subtitles (avi).
When I render the sequence in PP or export, the rendering time is way too slow and it only uses around 15-20% of the CPU and 3 GB of RAM.
My hardware config is :
- CPU : i7-4770k 3.50Ghz
- RAM : 8 GB
- Disk : 2 x 3 TB SATA (no raid)
RAM is not the bottleneck, neither the disk access.
I have tried rendering and exporting the same project on an iMac (with an i5 2.7 Ghz and 4 GB RAM and only 1 disk) and the result is 4x faster !!!
The CPU usage is close to 100% as well as RAM usage.
So how come PP uses all resources availble on an iMac and not on a Windows 7 ?
Is there any known bug or software bottleneck on Windows 7 ?
My machine is brand new and nothing much installed besides Adobe products.
Any help is very much appreciated.
Thanks,

I just rendered out a a 2 minute sequence with about 100 clips in it and Colorista effects on everything to the Vimeo 1080 H264 preset. It took about 5 minutes to render straight from Premiere, it used all the recourses it could, my CPU was running at near %100, same with my ram and GPU, I was happy.
Then I did another render with Red Giant Denoiser and it now wants to take 30 mins and it is only using about %20 of the recourses available. My problem isn't that its taking longer with Denoiser but that its not using all of my computers CPU and GPU.
Im rendering at maximum render quality and bit dept to H264 (Im happy to wait the extra time), if I try to use VRB 2 it encodes 1 pass at a time and wants to take up to 40 minutes.
I would appreciate some advice on this.
Premiere Pro CC 2013
2.6 GHz Intel Core i7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M 2048 MB (CUDA GPU enabled in Premiere)
16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
OS X 10.9.4 (13E28)

Hi all, i'm new and facing a problem while creating a new file for Xcode. I can't select the box "with XIB for user interface" if the subclass is "UIViewController".this problem happen after i upgrade Xcode to 4.6 version.Appreciate for any help rendered.

Hi all, i'm new to Mac book & Xcode. I'm learning and facing problems while creating a new file for Xcode. Before i upgrade the software, i have no issue to create simple steps in apps. After upgrade Xcode to 4.6 version, i'm facing lot's of issue eg.
1) "the identity "iphone developer" doesn't match any valid certificate/ private key pair",
2) can't select the box "with XIB for user interface" if the subclass is "UIViewController"..
Appreciate for any help rendered.

Mikko777 wrote:So what is the best?
I wouldn't judge. I've been to Arch for a week, you know? But as said, it's VERY close to it.
What I dislike after a week is makepkg not handling dependencies automatically (which would be overhead, so probably not appropriate).
Mikko777 wrote:Also theres KDEmod for modular kde, dunno if its for 64 bits tho.
Don't actually need that as said ... I see no real benefit of having that other than not beeing a KDE user or having Gentoos useflags.
Mikko777 wrote:PS:You produce a lot of text and welcome smile
Yeah. Wonder why I'm still employed? So do I ...

Why do I get a loss of quality video when placing titels or grading in FCE. Even after rendering and saving to the final product? The video starts to get shaky

Whenever I place a title in my video in FCE, the part where I placed it losses its quality. Its getting shaky and blurred.
Even afther rendering and saving it to the final end product. The same problem occurs when I'm collor grading. I use the internal tools for titels and grading of FCE.

and some more specs;
My systsem >>
IMac 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3
clips and master on Imac
Scratchdisk on external disk with firewire 0.8
On both disks I have more tehn 0,5 TB geheugen left
Videocamera HF 100
Imported clips >>
- FXP 17 Mbps
For RT I use >>
- RT Unlimited
- Playback Video Quality high
- Playback framerate high
Videoclip =
- videorate 25 fps
- framesize 1920 x 1080
- compressor apple intermediate codec
- pixel aspect square

Using FCE 4 to edit mov file, inserted 8 chapter markers by double tap M, enter title, click add chapter marker. Rendered and half of the chapter markers unrecognized or not functional. Delete FCE prefs and redo project did not help. How to fix?

Using FCE 4 to edit mov file. Added 8 chapter markers by double tap M, enter title, click add chapter marker. Rendered and 4 of the chapter markers are skipped or not functioning. Deleting FCE prefs and rebuild project did not solve. Solution anyone?

Thanks for taking a look, I am pretty new on a Mac, is this the data you need?

Help on Renderer and Editor

Hi All,
I am new to Swing and get really confused with the concepts of Renderer and Editor. I don' t really understand what Renderer is, why/when use it and how to use it. Similarly questions for Editor. There are a lot of classes related to renderer, such as TableCellRenderer, DefaultCellRenderer etc and they make me crazy. What makes different when we use Renderer and Editor?
Thanks.

Read "Concepts: Editors and Renderers" for JTable at http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing/components/table.html#editrender and "Customizing a Tree's Display " for JTree "http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing/components/tree.html#display

Please help with highest quality export settings...

I have searched the forum and web for hours (no joke!) and I am still trying to figure out what are the best video settings to give me the highest HD quality video in daylight. I am using a Canon HF200 and the latest updated version of FCE. My problem is that I am unable to produce an HD quality video at 1920 x 1080 Full HD without being "jagged". I have two questions; what do you suggest to be the best FCE import and export settings to produce the best HD video, and what settings do you have your HF200 set to (for normal daylight conditions), to produce the best HD video file? The file will be played directly thru my computer to a plasma HDTV.
I have tried several settings, but using anything above 1280x720 16:9, makes the video "jagged". Again, I don't care about the size of the file or how long it takes, I just want the best. Is there something I am missing?
My FCP settings are the following:
I log and transfer the video from the camera into FCP (on a black MacBook; 2.16 GHz with 4 GB RAM) using the AVCHD Apple Intermediate Codec 1920 x 1080i source. I then export the video using the following:
Export using "Quicktime Conversion".
Quicktime options video settings are:
Frame Rate set to "Current"
Key Frames set to every "24" frames
Compressor quality: "best" (Encoding set to "best quality")
Data Rate set to "automatic"
Quicktime options video size are:
"HD 1280 x 720 16:9" (anything higher produces the jags!)
Deinterlace source video is NOT checked
My Canon HF 200 settings are the following:
- P mode
- FXP (17 Mbps)
- 60i framerate
all others are set to the normal default
I have read some reports saying the above is good and others suggesting changing FXP to MXP (24 Mbps) and/or the framerate from 60i to PF30. I don't care about the size of the file, I just want the highest quality HD file.
Any suggestions for the best FCE settings and/or HF200 settings would be very much appreciated!
Thanks for your help,
Evan

Thanks again for the feedback
Let me try my best to answer the above (I'm new at all this and I appreciate you guys taking the time to try and help me out).
First off, I tried rendering and that did not help.
Here is my sequence. I am not going into FCE from the camera directly. I have archived the video file from the camera using iMovie (as well as just making an exact copy of the camera files; they both appear to me to be the exact same, both can be logged and transferred into FCE, and both files give me a jagged FCE result).
Once I log and transfer the file(s), I then take the clip and add it to a sequence file (rendering or not rendering the clip(s) at this point does not make a difference), and then click/highlight the sequence file in the browser and export it.
As for "editing the video in a 1920x1080i60 sequence", I think I am. I am not doing any editing to the clip. It is logged and transferred using the AVCHD Apple Intermediate Codec 1920 x 1080i and then exported using either as a Quicktime Movie or Quicktime Conversion (set for 1920 x 1080 using H.264 compression; both ways still result in a jagged video).
That's about it...log and transfer, add clip to sequence, and then export sequence...
I hope this answers the above, but if not, I apologize; I'm still learning!
Also, if I use iMovie, with similar export (share) settings, I get a non-jagged video (I have tried with deinterlacing and not deinterlacing, and both video results are fine)
Thanks again,
Evan

Poor Rendered Video Quality PE7

Hi All,
I've been running the trial of PE7 for a few weeks comparing against my existing copy of Pinnacle 10 and trial of Power Director. I love the interface and edit abilities, however when I generate DVD files and view them the result from PE7 is of a much lower quality than from Pinnacle or Power Director.
I'm using the default quality settings in each of the programs and viewing all with the same DVD viewing software (AVS Player). The originating AVI that was edited was captured using Pinnacle, but I imported it into PE7 and rendered a PE7 DV AVI for editing to make sure I was working with PE defaults. The picture seems to be more grainy and less vibrant in color with PE7. Of course having the big black "PE7 Trial" directly across the middle of the screen doesn't help with comparison (what possessed them to put the watermark directly across the focal point of the viewfinder?), but I'm pretty certain the PE7 files are not as good.
Is there some setting that I'm missing that would make the video from PE7 that much worse than the other two products? I can't believe that the Adobe product would be that much worse without someting I'm doing wrong or missing.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
Dale

Dale,
The test of each program would be to author a DVD (use RW, so you don't spend a bunch of $ on test DVD's) and then watch that through a DVD software player on the computer, or on a set-top player to TV.
As for the display in the programs, there are a couple of things to look at. In PE, if your DV AVI Clip shows a green line, above the Timeline, it does not require Rendering. If it's red, just hit Enter, to Render it. If you Rt-click on the Display Monitor, you can choose Fit, or one of several resolutions - choose 100% and see if your display improves. Fit is basically a "draft preview," sized to fill the Display Monitor, where 100% should show the actual detail.
It's been a long time, and several versions ago, since I last used Pinnacle, but I was less than impressed by its "monitor" back then. However, I am going both from memory and also this was on a previous laptop. Though it also had a 17" monitor, the rez was way down (totally different GPU), than what I am now using.
I have Power Director on my workstation (dual 21" CRT Hitachi 915's), and I see no difference between it's display, and that in P-Pro2, when I switch it to 100%. They both look the same to me. Do not have PE on the workstation, and do not have Power Director on the laptop, so I cannot compare those in an A-B situation.
Going back a couple of versions of P-Pro, Adobe went from DirectShow display to a common display engine for all of their programs. It has been my experience, when setup to 100%, that their displays are equal to, or better than, any program using DirectShow. This is for footage that does not need to be Rendered, or that has been Rendered, and is for 100%, and not Fit. I do not know if Pinnacel and Cyberlink still use DirectShow.
One last item to consider is the display settings on your monitor. Because Adobe does not use DirectShow any more, you could have differences there. I'd spend just a bit of time with the settings on your monitor, both in the Windows' Display, and in your GPU's utilities, to see if you can "calibrate" your monitor for best viewing of the Adobe display engine. In my nVidia Quadro 4500FX control panel, I have one setting for "Print Work," and one for "Video," and my needs fluctuate between the two. I also use Adobe Photoshop's Adobe Gamma utility to set things up for my print work. It is no longer included in the latest CS3-CS4 Photoshop.
Hunt

ProRes422 effects rendering and graphics card

We are having problems with effects rendering and playing using Prorez 422 HQ.
Our system is: Mac Pro 2x 2.66 GHz dual core Xeon, 4GB RAM, with a NVidea GeForce 7300GT graphics card with 256 MB VRAM, pulling media off of a Facillis Terrablock.
We get the following error message:
"The effect "Desaturate" cannot be rendered in sequence of this size with the current graphics card"
The time line shows the effect as rendered, but it will not play in the canvas desaturated. It does show in the Browser desaturated.
Settings are at Safe RT, High Quality, full frame rate - we need to go out to tape.
Obviously, the error indicates we should use a different graphics card, but is this correct? Everything else I read indicates that this card should be enough to edit and do effects with in FCP. Is there a problem with using this card for Prorez or HD material? Is there a settings issue we should be looking at? What is the recommended card? Are there any links to the recommendations or known issues? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,

I'm assuming that's an FXPlug filter. ATI cards handle FXPlug filters netter than nVidia cards, so if that's the problem, I wonder if one of these workarounds might help:
1) Place the clip, with enough heads and tails to allow for transitions in the final sequence, in a new sequence, apply the filer and see if it renders OK. Export that to a QT movie, import that back into the project and drop it into the final sequence in place of the unrenderable clip that's there now.
2) Put the clip into a new sequence, apply the filter but don't render. Export to a QT reference movie, and drop that into Compressor, and select the same codec as you are using for the final sequence and see it that will render.

Issue regarding Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART in SAP TPM IP

Gurus,
I am facing an issue regarding SAP TPM IP ( HANA)
I have 3 Infoproviders
Planning infocube, Planning DSO1, Planning DSO2 and i created multiprovider and added these 3 infoproviders into it. I have created Aggregation level on multiprovider. Created Bex Input ready query on Aggregation level.
Issue is Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART.
I tried debugging it and found it is trying to read i_r_pro -> n_ts_part. It is populated with only 3 values (i.e. 2DSOs and 1 Cube), whereas <l_partprov>-partprov is referring to Aggergation level, hence read statement isn't successful, it is dumping.
The class CL_RSD_INFOPROV_CACHE->GET() method is trying to populate the N_TS_PART.N_TS_PART uses P_R_INFOPROV table which seems to be already populated. So, I debugged all the below methods to find out how the P_R_INFOPROV but couldn't find any clue.
Can any one help,it would be really help.
Thanks
Ashok

Hello Gregor,
On the launch of planning layout it throws an error message:
Planning is not possible RSCRM_IMP_CORE008.
When I debugged, i got to a point wherein
particular Real Time Planning DSO is
not getting retrieved under the MultiProivder in below class.
Class: CL_RSCRM_IMP_ACTIONS_SERVICE, Method: GET_INFOPROV is not
returning the real time Info-Provider Name(i.e. Planning DSO)
underlyingthe Multiprovider.
I've also tried to run the report mentioned by you for the Multiprovider but issue still exists.
Let me know, if you have any pointers on this topic.
Thanks,
Jomy

Print Sizing and Quality Issues

When I print PDF documents I have issues with sizing and quality. I only have this issue with my Mac. Windows prints the files as they should be. I've tried two different printers, both over network. It doesn't matter whether I am in Adobe or in a browser. Basically it oversizes the documents and cuts off the edges. The quality on images and logos is severly degraded. This probelm existed in Lion and now in Mountain Lion. Any help?

What we need are the clip properties & sequence settings in Final Cut Express. Your screenshot is from a Finder window.
It would appear you have a clip with nonstandard frame size (1366x768) in an H.264 file. FCE cannot edit this material. FCE is limited to specific codecs and frame sizes. You need to convert your clip to QuickTime/Apple Intermediate Codec. If it's highdef widescreen then convert it to QT/AIC 1920x1080i. Try using MPEG Streamclip to convert the source clip.
You also need to be using a matching Easy Setup in Final Cut Express. If your source media file is QT/AIC 1920x1080i then you should select the AVCHD Apple Intermediate Codec 1920x1080i60 Easy Setup in FCE -AND- then create a new sequence before importing your clip into FCE and placing it in your sequence (timeline)

Premiere Pro CC - Playback issues, rendering and export

Adobe Premiere Pro CC 7.2.2
Computer: HP Elite Book
OS: Window 7 Professional
RAM: 8GB
Intel I7 Processor
64 Bit Operating System
Intel HD Graphics Card
250 GB Computer, 39.2 GB Free
Hello all -
I am trying to edit, render, and export a video for play on YouTube. The source is a Camtasia Studio 8 Screen capture with a 1080P High Defintion PTZ camera that is hooked up to the computer as the "webcam". We recorded the screen, used Camtasia to produce and edit, and saved it as a .MOV
I then transferred the .MOV to my computer and opened Premiere Pro CC. I have been watching a lot of YouTube videos and have a read a lot of threads, so I decided that a simple edit job would be the easiest and fastest. I have attempted this 3 times now, each try has been a failure.
Attempt 1:
Opened a new project. Imported my video. Dropped it into a sequence. Added an opening and closing title card, plus lower third captions to video, and added transitions. Playback was choppy, so I read that it needed to be rendered. I rendered the sequence (it took most of the evening). When I went to play it back, I just got footage that said "Media pending" in 7 different languages.
Attempt 2: I decided not to render, just export. Followed the steps above, but instead of rendering, and exported it. I exported as media file, chose the TechSmith Capture Codec, and .AVI as the format. Let it do it's thing. The result was very fuzzy, plus the audio was about 10 seconds out of sync from the video.
Attempt 3: I didn't get very far here, because when I started playback to check my audio syncing, my computer started flipping between Premiere and my desktop, just swtiching back and forth.
Any help here, suggestions, would be very much appreciated. I need to post this video for work as soon as I can.
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 7.2.2
Computer: HP Elite Book
OS: Window 7 Professional
RAM: 8GB
Intel I7 Processor
64 Bit Operating System
Intel HD Graphics Card
250 GB Computer, 39.2 GB Free

Camtasia http://forums.adobe.com/thread/836800 may help
-and Lagarith Codec http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1287577
-and http://forums.adobe.com/thread/775288
-and http://forums.adobe.com/thread/453044
-and http://forums.adobe.com/message/3202148

Organization unit ID is different in Dev and Quality Systems

Hi Experts,
We have downloaded the Organizational Structure from ECC in the Dev System, Sales organizations, Sales offices and sales groups were created with number range Assigned to Current Active Plan version. but the number for the Sales orgs started with 50000026 instead of starting with 50000001. And in the Quality again we have downloaded the Org. structure from ECC, now the IDs were created starting from 50000007. this causing the inconsistencies in the Qualtiy System like, Pricing procedures are not getting determined.
why the Ids were created from 50000026 instead of 50000001.
What are best practices to have the same ID for Organizational Units in both the Systems?
Thanks and Regards,
S Reddy

Hi Kiran,
thanks for responses,
Now we are planning to delete the Org. Structure in Quality and planning transport if from Development. What is best approach to save the Org. model in Transport request and move to Quality. I came to know about the report RHMOVE30, will it be used for transporting from Dev to Quality?
One more thing, if we transfer the Org data to Quality will it take the same no. in Quality. I have doubt, If Dev Org Id were created from 50000026 and Quality it will start from 50000000.
Kindly help me,
thanks and Regards,
S Reddy

Help Rendering and Quality

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for