Help REPLACE view with 3 union

look at this large view
I want to modify it to select also Discount2 and Discount3 from c_order table
I just add one line and I'm getting:
ORA-01789: query block has incorrect number of result columns
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW C_Order_LineTax_v
AS
SELECT ol.AD_Client_ID, ol.AD_Org_ID, ol.IsActive, ol.Created, ol.CreatedBy, ol.Updated, ol.UpdatedBy,
'en_US' AS AD_Language,
ol.C_Order_ID, ol.C_OrderLine_ID, ol.C_Tax_ID,
ol.Line,
ol.QtyOrdered, uom.UOMSymbol,
COALESCE(p.Name, ol.Description) AS Name, -- main line
CASE WHEN p.Name IS NOT NULL THEN ol.Description END AS Description, -- second line
p.DocumentNote, -- third line
p.UPC, p.SKU, p.Value AS ProductValue,
ra.Description AS ResourceDescription, -- forth line
CASE WHEN i.IsDiscountPrinted='Y' THEN ol.PriceList END AS PriceList,
CASE WHEN i.IsDiscountPrinted='Y' AND ol.PriceList>ol.PriceActual THEN (ol.PriceList-ol.PriceActual)/ol.PriceList*100 END AS Discount,
ol.Discount2, ol.Discount3,
ol.PriceActual, ol.LineNetAmt
FROM C_OrderLine ol
INNER JOIN C_UOM uom ON (ol.C_UOM_ID=uom.C_UOM_ID)
INNER JOIN C_Order i ON (ol.C_Order_ID=i.C_Order_ID)
LEFT OUTER JOIN M_Product p ON (ol.M_PRODUCT_ID=p.M_PRODUCT_ID)
LEFT OUTER JOIN S_ResourceAssignment ra ON (ol.S_ResourceAssignment_ID=ra.S_ResourceAssignment_ID)
UNION
SELECT ol.AD_Client_ID, ol.AD_Org_ID, ol.IsActive, ol.Created, ol.CreatedBy, ol.Updated, ol.UpdatedBy,
'en_US' AS AD_Language,
ol.C_Order_ID, ol.C_OrderLine_ID, ol.C_Tax_ID,
ol.Line+(b.Line/100) AS Line,
ol.QtyOrdered*b.BOMQty AS QtyInvoiced,
uom.UOMSymbol,
p.Name, -- main
b.Description,
p.DocumentNote, p.UPC, p.SKU, p.Value AS ProductValue,
null, null, null, null, null
FROM M_Product_BOM b -- BOM lines
INNER JOIN C_OrderLine ol ON (b.M_Product_ID=ol.M_Product_ID)
INNER JOIN M_Product bp ON (bp.M_Product_ID=ol.M_Product_ID -- BOM Product
AND bp.IsBOM='Y' AND bp.IsVerified='Y' AND bp.IsInvoicePrintDetails='Y')
INNER JOIN M_Product p ON (b.M_ProductBOM_ID=p.M_Product_ID) -- BOM line product
INNER JOIN C_UOM uom ON (p.C_UOM_ID=uom.C_UOM_ID)
UNION
SELECT AD_Client_ID, AD_Org_ID, IsActive, Created, CreatedBy, Updated, UpdatedBy,
'en_US', C_Order_ID, null, null,
null,
null, null,
null,
null, null, null, null, null, null,
null, null, null, null
FROM C_Order
UNION
SELECT ot.AD_Client_ID, ot.AD_Org_ID, ot.IsActive, ot.Created, ot.CreatedBy, ot.Updated, ot.UpdatedBy,
'en_US', ot.C_Order_ID, null, ot.C_Tax_ID,
null,
null, null,
t.Name,
null, null, null, null, null, null,
null,null, ot.TaxBaseAmt, ot.TaxAmt
FROM C_OrderTax ot
INNER JOIN C_Tax t ON (ot.C_Tax_ID=t.C_Tax_ID)

make sure the columns being null (in 2. or 3. select) correspond to columns of type VARCHAR2 in 1. query
Otherwise use : to_date(null) or to_number(null)

Similar Messages

Backup DC past tombstone and need help replacing it with another DC with the same name and IP

Hey Everyone
We have a single domain in a forest with 2 DCs with AD integrated DNS configured. The primary DC with all the FSMO roles is a VM (Server 2008 R2) and the backup DC is a physical server (Server 2008 non-R2).
The backup DC's hardware is very old and has been giving us a lot of issues where the system would intermittently BSOD, freeze, black screen only etc. and as a result, the server was turned off for a very long time, definitely beyond the default tombstone
lifetime of either 60 or 180 days.
We want to replace this bad backup DC with another physical server which became available as a spare and is much newer and in a working condition hardware wise. We also wish to ultimately give it the same name (FQDN) and IP to basically make it an outright
replacement for the current bad backup DC.
My questions are:
1.) If we are in a position where the bad server could possibly physically boot and start the operating system and have network connectivity, will we be able to use DCPROMO as one would normally do to demote this DC, or will it have to be done forcefully,
while keeping in mind as I said that the DC is way past the tombstone lifetime period?
2.) If it has to be done forcefully, I am aware that the meta data needs to be cleaned up in AD on the working primary DC, although I have never performed such a process before. If this is done, are there any other things I need to look out for or do
before I attempt to replace it with the other server which I will set up wit the same name (FQDN) and IP, then add to the domain, and then lastly promote as per normal using DCPROMO?
I know we will have to upgrade the scema to 2012RM as the replacement backup DC will be running this newer operating system.
Anything else you wish to add or point out to me would be highly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Regards,
CTV

Hi,
I would suggest please do the metadata cleanup using the script and then remove object from below DNS console and then run the repadmin /syncall /Aed
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/d31f091f-2642-4ede-9f97-0e1cc4d577f3
Repeat running the vbs script till the wrong/unnecessary dc’s are removed.
         Cross check the removal – dsa.msc [ad users and computers] > Domain Controllers OU
Adsiedit.msc
Expand domain partition, select OU=Domain Controllers, make sure only the necessary domain controllers are listed.
Delete the incorrect domain controllers.
Dnsmgmt.msc [Dns Management]
      Expand the forward lookup zones\_msdcs folder
i.      Make sure only the actual domain controllers are listed, delete wrong Alias recordsremove wrong name server records
ii.      Select the container [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\dc\_sites_\sitename\_tcp] > delete incorrect _ldap and _kerberos records are listed.
iii.      Select the container [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\dc\_tcp] and delete incorrect _ldap and _kerberos records
iv.      Expand the [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\domains\guid\_tcp] and delete incorrect _ldap entries
v.      Select [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\gc] – delete incorrect HostA records
vi.      Expand the [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\gc\_sites\sitename\_tcp] – delete incorrect _ldap entries
vii.      Select the [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\gc\_tcp] – delete incorrect _ldap entries
viii.      Select the [forward lookup zones\_msdcs.domain.com\pdc\_tcp] – delete incorrect _ldap entries
      Expand the forward lookup zones\domain.com folder
i.
Delete Host(A) records of dc’s which are non-existant.
ii.
Correct the NameServer (NS) records
iii.
Follow steps similar to ’ A ii ‘ >> ‘ A viii’
         Dssite.msc [Sites and Services]
      Expand the [Sites\Sitename\Servers] – delete incorrect server’s
B.      Delete incorrect subnet configurations [Sites\Subnets]
      Delete incorrect site links [Sites\IP]

HELP : Replacing Space with any character !

Hi !
How do I replace any spaces in a strings passed from a FORM INPUT, with a different character.
I tried doing this
String s= request.getParameters("info");
s.replace(' ','_');
But it keep giving me error.
it there any simpler way of doign this?
Thank you
K

Hi !
I am new to JSP,
It keep giving a null pointer exception when i use it with JSP
So i did this it work fine on the try section
and once it is in the catch section it keeps giving me Nullpointer exceptions again.
IS there any other way replacing the space with a "-" or anything..?
Thanks for your help.
here is the code
String r_space ="";
try {
r_space=value.replace(' ','+');
out.println("r_space : try " r_space "<br>");
catch(NullPointerException e) {
System.out.println("Recaught: " + e );
r_space=value.replace(' ','+');
out.println("r_space : cathc" r_space "<br>");

Help with slow union all

Hi
The problem Im having is that I had a query on sales order tables that used to take a couple of minutes to run. The user wanted contract orders to be added to the query and these were stored in different tables to the sales orders. I carried out union all joins in views and then applied the query to the views. Unfortunately it now takes 30 minutes to run.
I apologise for the large post, I am just trying to provide enough information for someone to help me out.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Stephen
The original query was:
SELECT
C_STD_COST.MAT, C_STD_COST.LAB, C_STD_COST.OHD, ITEM.PC, BILL_HDR.RATE,
BILL_SO.SO_SHIP_QTY, BILL_SO.SO_SHIP_EXT_AMT, AR_DOC.CUSTOMER,
BILL_SO.AR_DOC,
CUS_LOC.NAME, AR_DOC.CREATED_DATE, MEMO.TOT_ORD_QTY, MEMO.UNIT_PRICE,
MEMO.BOOK_RATE, AR_DOC.AR_DOC_TYPE, MEMO.MEMO_TYPE, BILL_SO.ITEM
FROM
AR_DOC, BILL_HDR, CUS_LOC, BILL_SO, ITEM, MEMO, C_STD_COST
WHERE
AR_DOC.AR_CCN=BILL_HDR.AR_CCN AND
AR_DOC.AR_DOC_TYPE=BILL_HDR.AR_DOC_TYPE AND
AR_DOC.AR_DOC=BILL_HDR.AR_DOC AND
AR_DOC.CUSTOMER=CUS_LOC.CUSTOMER AND
AR_DOC.CUS_AR_LOC=CUS_LOC.CUS_LOC AND
BILL_HDR.AR_CCN=BILL_SO.AR_CCN AND
BILL_HDR.AR_DOC_TYPE=BILL_SO.AR_DOC_TYPE AND
BILL_HDR.AR_DOC=BILL_SO.AR_DOC AND
BILL_SO.ITEM=ITEM.ITEM (+) AND
BILL_SO.REVISION=ITEM.REVISION (+) AND
BILL_SO.AR_DOC=MEMO.AR_DOC (+) AND
BILL_SO.AR_DOC_LINE=MEMO.MEMO_LINE (+) AND
BILL_SO.AR_CCN=MEMO.SALES_CCN (+) AND
BILL_SO.AR_DOC_TYPE=MEMO.MEMO_TYPE (+) AND
ITEM.ITEM=C_STD_COST.ITEM (+) AND
ITEM.REVISION=C_STD_COST.REVISION (+) AND
AR_DOC.CREATED_DATE>=TO_DATE ('30-05-2006 00:00:00', 'DD-MM-YYYY
HH24:MI:SS') AND
AR_DOC.CREATED_DATE<TO_DATE ('14-06-2006 00:00:00', 'DD-MM-YYYY
HH24:MI:SS')
ORDER BY
AR_DOC.CUSTOMER, ITEM.PCThe explain plan showed:
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT                ORDER BY
MERGE JOIN          OUTER
SORT                JOIN
NESTED LOOPS        OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS        OUTER
TABLE ACCESS        FULL              BILL_SO       4
TABLE ACCESS        BY INDEX ROWID    ITEM          5
INDEX               UNIQUE SCAN       PK_ITEM           UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS        BY INDEX ROWID    BILL_HDR      2
INDEX               UNIQUE SCAN       PK_BILL_HDR       UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS        BY INDEX ROWID    AR_DOC        1
INDEX               UNIQUE SCAN       PK_AR_DOC         UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS        BY INDEX ROWID    CUS_LOC       3
INDEX               UNIQUE SCAN       PK_CUS_LOC        UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS        BY INDEX ROWID    MEMO          6
INDEX               RANGE SCAN        PK_MEMO           UNIQUE
SORT                JOIN
TABLE ACCESS        FULL              COST_ITM      8The views I created were:
CREATE VIEW C_BILL_DET AS
SELECT
AR_CCN, AR_DOC_TYPE, AR_DOC, AR_DOC_LINE, ITEM,
REVISION, SO_SHIP_QTY, SO_SHIP_EXT_AMT, COST1
FROM
BILL_SO
UNION ALL
SELECT
AR_CCN, AR_DOC_TYPE, AR_DOC, AR_DOC_LINE, ITEM,
REVISION, SHIP_QTY, SHIP_EXT_AMT, COST1
FROM
CR_BLSH;
CREATE VIEW C_BILL_HDR AS
SELECT
AR_CCN, AR_DOC_TYPE, AR_DOC, RATE
FROM
BILL_HDR
UNION ALL
SELECT
AR_CCN, AR_DOC_TYPE, AR_DOC, RATE
FROM
CR_BLHD;The new query is:
SELECT
C_STD_COST.MAT, C_STD_COST.LAB, C_STD_COST.OHD, ITEM.PC, C_BILL_HDR.RATE,
C_BILL_DET.SO_SHIP_QTY, C_BILL_DET.SO_SHIP_EXT_AMT, AR_DOC.CUSTOMER,
C_BILL_DET.AR_DOC,
CUS_LOC.NAME, AR_DOC.CREATED_DATE, MEMO.TOT_ORD_QTY, MEMO.UNIT_PRICE,
MEMO.BOOK_RATE, AR_DOC.AR_DOC_TYPE, MEMO.MEMO_TYPE, C_BILL_DET.ITEM
FROM
AR_DOC, C_BILL_HDR, CUS_LOC, C_BILL_DET, ITEM, MEMO, C_STD_COST
WHERE
AR_DOC.AR_CCN=C_BILL_HDR.AR_CCN AND
AR_DOC.AR_DOC_TYPE=C_BILL_HDR.AR_DOC_TYPE AND
AR_DOC.AR_DOC=C_BILL_HDR.AR_DOC AND
AR_DOC.CUSTOMER=CUS_LOC.CUSTOMER AND
AR_DOC.CUS_AR_LOC=CUS_LOC.CUS_LOC AND
C_BILL_HDR.AR_CCN=C_BILL_DET.AR_CCN AND
C_BILL_HDR.AR_DOC_TYPE=C_BILL_DET.AR_DOC_TYPE AND
C_BILL_HDR.AR_DOC=C_BILL_DET.AR_DOC AND
C_BILL_DET.ITEM=ITEM.ITEM (+) AND
C_BILL_DET.REVISION=ITEM.REVISION (+) AND
C_BILL_DET.AR_DOC=MEMO.AR_DOC (+) AND
C_BILL_DET.AR_DOC_LINE=MEMO.MEMO_LINE (+) AND
C_BILL_DET.AR_CCN=MEMO.SALES_CCN (+) AND
C_BILL_DET.AR_DOC_TYPE=MEMO.MEMO_TYPE (+) AND
ITEM.ITEM=C_STD_COST.ITEM (+) AND
ITEM.REVISION=C_STD_COST.REVISION (+) AND
AR_DOC.CREATED_DATE>=TO_DATE ('30-05-2006 00:00:00', 'DD-MM-YYYY
HH24:MI:SS') AND
AR_DOC.CREATED_DATE<TO_DATE ('14-06-2006 00:00:00', 'DD-MM-YYYY
HH24:MI:SS')
ORDER BY
AR_DOC.CUSTOMER, ITEM.PCThe explain plan is:
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT                ORDER BY
MERGE JOIN          OUTER
SORT                JOIN
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
MERGE JOIN
SORT                JOIN
NESTED LOOPS        OUTER
NESTED LOOPS        OUTER
VIEW                                  C_BILL_DET   4
UNION-ALL
TABLE ACCESS        FULL              BILL_SO      9
TABLE ACCESS        FULL              CR_BLSH      10
TABLE ACCESS        BY INDEX ROWID    ITEM         5
INDEX               UNIQUE SCAN       PK_ITEM           UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS        BY INDEX ROWID    MEMO         6
INDEX               RANGE SCAN        PK_MEMO           UNIQUE
SORT                JOIN
VIEW                                  C_BILL_HDR   2
UNION-ALL
TABLE ACCESS        FULL              BILL_HDR     11
TABLE ACCESS        FULL              CR_BLHD      12
TABLE ACCESS        BY INDEX ROWID    AR_DOC       1
INDEX               UNIQUE SCAN       PK_AR_DOC         UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS        BY INDEX ROWID    CUS_LOC      3
INDEX               UNIQUE SCAN       PK_CUS_LOC        UNIQUE
SORT                JOIN
TABLE ACCESS        FULL              COST_ITM     8

I don't understand.
I try your with statement and get: "end_date" invalid identifier as an error
I start my query out:
WITH start_date as
(select to_date ('08/15/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM') from dual),
end_date as (select to_date ('08/18/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM) from dual)
select sales.id, start_date as callstart, end_date as callend
where sales.created_timestamp >= start_date
and sales.created_timestamp < end_date
UNION ALL
<<<<<<<here is where you take the last select statement and replace sales with manufacturing>>>>>>>>>>>>>
UNION ALL
<<<<<<<here is where you take the last select statement and replace sales with engineering>>>>>>>>>>>>>
and it still fails.

Help with a union all statement

Hello
I am pulling a query much like this:
(select ID, Created_timestamp from snapshot1
where created_timestamp >= to_date ('8/15/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM')
and created_timestamp < to_date('8/18/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
UNION ALL
(select ID, created_timestamp from snapshot2
where created_timestamp >= to_date ('8/15/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM')
and created_timestamp < to_date('8/18/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
UNION ALL
(select ID, created_timestamp from data_history
where created_timestamp >= to_date ('8/15/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM')
and created_timestamp < to_date('8/18/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))
Is there an easier way to handle created_timestamp?
I would like to put it at the beginning so I only have to change it in one place.

I don't understand.
I try your with statement and get: "end_date" invalid identifier as an error
I start my query out:
WITH start_date as
(select to_date ('08/15/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM') from dual),
end_date as (select to_date ('08/18/2007 12:00:00 AM','MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM) from dual)
select sales.id, start_date as callstart, end_date as callend
where sales.created_timestamp >= start_date
and sales.created_timestamp < end_date
UNION ALL
<<<<<<<here is where you take the last select statement and replace sales with manufacturing>>>>>>>>>>>>>
UNION ALL
<<<<<<<here is where you take the last select statement and replace sales with engineering>>>>>>>>>>>>>
and it still fails.

Materialized View with Joins

Dear Dev/DBAs,
I have the following scenario:
SQL> CREATE TABLE T1 (ID NUMBER(3),NAME VARCHAR2(10));
SQL> CREATE TABLE T2 (ID NUMBER(3),NAME VARCHAR2(10));
The T1 contains records having the ID num from 10 to 80 and the T2 having the ID from 90 to 170
SQL> SELECT * FROM T1 JOIN ALL SELECT * FROM T2
It give all records in the 2 tables.
I'm planning to create a materialized view (like CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW V_TAB REFRESH ON COMMIT AS SELECT * FROM T1 JOIN ALL SELECT * FROM T2) and it seems i can't do with the error ORA-12054, further the oracle documentation says that materialized view can only be used with a simple join.
Do you have another solution??
Note that the materialized views can be used to improve queries.
Thank you in advance

Straight from the link I posted:
*Restrictions on Fast Refresh on Materialized Views with UNION ALL*Materialized views with the UNION ALL set operator support the REFRESH FAST option if the following conditions are satisfied:
* The defining query must have the UNION ALL operator at the top level.
The UNION ALL operator cannot be embedded inside a subquery, with one exception: The UNION ALL can be in a subquery in the FROM clause provided the defining query is of the form SELECT * FROM (view or subquery with UNION ALL) as in the following example:
CREATE VIEW view_with_unionall AS
(SELECT c.rowid crid, c.cust_id, 2 umarker
FROM customers c WHERE c.cust_last_name = 'Smith'
UNION ALL
SELECT c.rowid crid, c.cust_id, 3 umarker
FROM customers c WHERE c.cust_last_name = 'Jones');
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW unionall_inside_view_mv
REFRESH FAST ON DEMAND AS
SELECT * FROM view_with_unionall;
Note that the view view_with_unionall satisfies the requirements for fast refresh.
* Each query block in the UNION ALL query must satisfy the requirements of a fast refreshable materialized view with aggregates or a fast refreshable materialized view with joins.
The appropriate materialized view logs must be created on the tables as required for the corresponding type of fast refreshable materialized view.
Note that the Oracle Database also allows the special case of a single table materialized view with joins only provided the ROWID column has been included in the SELECT list and in the materialized view log. This is shown in the defining query of the view view_with_unionall.
* The SELECT list of each query must include a maintenance column, called a UNION ALL marker. The UNION ALL column must have a distinct constant numeric or string value in each UNION ALL branch. Further, the marker column must appear in the same ordinal position in the SELECT list of each query block.
* Some features such as outer joins, insert-only aggregate materialized view queries and remote tables are not supported for materialized views with UNION ALL.
* Partiton Change Tracking (PCT)-based refresh is not supported for UNION ALL materialized views.
* The compatibility initialization parameter must be set to 9.2.0 or higher to create a fast refreshable materialized view with UNION ALL.

Creating view with union, what to do if a table is missing?

Dear All,
I have three schema in one DB, 11gR1 is the database and Linux is OS.
Schema1
Schema2
Schema3
Each schema contains almost the same structure, but different data.
There are few tables that exists in one schema and may not exist in the other one.
In another schema, i am creating consolidated views using union command.
select * from schema1.table1
union
select * from schema2.table1
union
select * from schema2.table1
If table1 do not exists in schema2, the view gives error.
Is there any possibility that query somehow check if the table exists then select records otherwise skip? It has to be one query.
I hope i am able to deliver through words what I mean.
Your kind help is required on this.
Regards, Imran

So basically
you want to have one view for all the tables with same name in different schemas
and you don't want to check the existence of tables before creating the view.
In that case you can create a script to generate the views by selecting from dba_tables like below
select 'create or replace view v_'||table_name||' as select * from '||owner||'.'||table_name||' union bla bla bla' from dba_tables where table_name='table'
you will probably end up doing this with a cursor and you need to be carefull about union clauses in case there is no bla bla part
Coskan Gundogar
Blog: http://coskan.wordpress.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/coskan
Linkedin: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/coskan
---------

Updatable Materialized View with Union ALL

(please don't ask about db structure)
DB: 11gR2
create table table_1 (
    id number primary key,
    val varchar2(100)
create table table_2 (
    id number primary key,
    val varchar2(100)
insert into table_1(id) values (0);
insert into table_1(id) values (2);
insert into table_1(id) values (3);
insert into table_1(id) values (4);
insert into table_1(id) values (5);
insert into table_2(id) values (10);
insert into table_2(id) values (12);
insert into table_2(id) values (13);
insert into table_2(id) values (14);
insert into table_2(id) values (15);
update table_1 set val='Table1 val:'||id;
update table_2 set val='Table2 val:'||id;
create view v_table_all as
select * from table_1
view V_TABLE_ALL created.
select * from v_table_all;
ID                     VAL
0                      Table1 val:0
2                      Table1 val:2
3                      Table1 val:3
4                      Table1 val:4
5                      Table1 val:5
select column_name, updatable, insertable, deletable
from user_updatable_columns
where table_name = 'V_TABLE_ALL'
COLUMN_NAME                    UPDATABLE INSERTABLE DELETABLE
ID                             YES       YES        YES
VAL                            YES       YES        YES
update v_table_all set val='XXX changed' where id = 3;
1 row updated.
select * from table_1;
ID                     VAL
0                      Table1 val:0
2                      Table1 val:2
3                      XXX changed
4                      Table1 val:4
5                      Table1 val:5
rollback;
select * from table_1;
ID                     VAL
0                      Table1 val:0
2                      Table1 val:2
3                      Table1 val:3
4                      Table1 val:4
5                      Table1 val:5
create or replace view v_table_all as
select * from table_1
union select * from table_2;
view V_TABLE_ALL created.
select * from v_table_all;
ID                     VAL
0                      Table1 val:0
2                      Table1 val:2
3                      Table1 val:3
4                      Table1 val:4
5                      Table1 val:5
10                     Table2 val:10
12                     Table2 val:12
13                     Table2 val:13
14                     Table2 val:14
15                     Table2 val:15
select column_name, updatable, insertable, deletable
from user_updatable_columns
where table_name = 'V_TABLE_ALL'
COLUMN_NAME                    UPDATABLE INSERTABLE DELETABLE
ID                             NO        NO         NO
VAL                            NO        NO         NO
trying update:
update v_table_all set val='XXX changed' where id = 3;
SQL-Fehler: ORA-01732: Datenmanipulationsoperation auf dieser View nicht zulässig
01732. 00000 - "data manipulation operation not legal on this view"
*Cause:
*Action:
drop view v_table_all;
view V_TABLE_ALL dropped.all is ok before this point.
now we want create a new materialized view with some query
create materialized view v_table_all
as
select * from table_1
union all select * from table_2 ;
materialized view V_TABLE_ALL created.
select column_name, updatable, insertable, deletable
from user_updatable_columns
where table_name = 'V_TABLE_ALL'
COLUMN_NAME                    UPDATABLE INSERTABLE DELETABLE
ID                             YES       YES        YES
VAL                            YES       YES        YES       it seems to be ok with update.
but...
update v_table_all set val='XXX changed' where id = 3;
SQL-Fehler: ORA-01732: Datenmanipulationsoperation auf dieser View nicht zulässig
01732. 00000 - "data manipulation operation not legal on this view"
*Cause:
*Action:How can solve this issue??
Any suggestion

Looks like user_updatable_columns sort of thinks the MV is just a table - I don't know about that...
An MV on a single table can be updated - I tried that and it works:
create materialized view mv_table_1 for update
as
select * from table_1;I noticed [url http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16579/advmv.htm#sthref294]examples stating the UNION ALL needs a "marker" so Oracle can know from the data which source table a row in the MV originates from - like this:
create materialized view v_table_all for update
as
select 'T1' tab_id, table_1.* from table_1
union all
select 'T2' tab_id, table_2.* from table_2 ;But that also fails (the "marker" requirement was specifically for FAST REFRESH, so it was just a long shot ;-) )
What are you planning to do?
<li>Create the MV.
<li>Update records in the MV - which then is no longer consistent with the source data.
<li>Schedule a complete refresh once in a while - thereby overwriting/losing the updates in the MV.
If that is the case, I suggest using a true table rather than an MV.
<li>Create table t_table_all as select ... .
<li>Update records in the table - which then is no longer consistent with the source data.
<li>Schedule a job to delete table and insert into table select ... once in a while - thereby overwriting/losing the updates in the table.
In other words a kind of "do it yourself MV".
I cannot see another way at the moment? But perhaps try in the data warehousing forum - the people there may have greater experience with MV's ;-)

Create view with union

Hi all,
I have tried to create a view with next code:
CREATE VIEW vista_urbanizacion AS SELECT
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.NOMBRE_URBANIZACION,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.NRO_PREDIOS,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.NRO_URBANIZACION,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.ESTADO,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.FECHA_INGRESO,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.AREA_TERRENO,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.TIPO,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.UBICACION_ARCHIVO,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.NRO_SUPERURBANIZACION,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.ID_URBANIZADOR,
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.AREA_TOTAL_CESION,
RUPI_ESCRITURAS.MATRICULA_INMOBILIARIA,
RUPI_ESCRITURAS.NOTARIA,
RUPI_ESCRITURAS.CIUDAD,
RUPI_ESCRITURAS.ACTO_JURIDICO,
RUPI_ESCRITURAS.FECHA_ESCRITURA,
RUPI_ESCRITURAS.NRO_ESCRITURA,
RUPI_ESCRITURAS.CONSECUTIVO,
RUPI_ESCRITURAS.URBANIZACI_NRO_URBANIZACION,
RUPI_ACTAS.TIPO_ACTA,
RUPI_ACTAS.NRO_ACTA,
RUPI_ACTAS.FECHA_ACTA
FROM
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES,
RUPI_ESCRITURAS,
RUPI_ACTAS
WHERE
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.NRO_URBANIZACION =
RUPI_ESCRITURAS.URBANIZACI_NRO_URBANIZACION
AND
FECHA_ESCRITURA IN (SELECT MIN(FECHA_ESCRITURA) FROM RUPI_ESCRITURAS
WHERE
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.NRO_URBANIZACION = RUPI_ESCRITURAS.URBANIZACI_NRO_URBANIZACION)
AND
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.NRO_URBANIZACION =
RUPI_ACTAS.URBANIZACI_NRO_URBANIZACION
AND
FECHA_ACTA IN (SELECT MAX(FECHA_ACTA) FROM RUPI_ACTAS
WHERE
RUPI_URBANIZACIONES.NRO_URBANIZACION =
RUPI_ACTAS.URBANIZACI_NRO_URBANIZACION)
The problem is the condition "and" from the rupi_escrituras and rupi_actas tables that only will select elements of rupi_urbanizaciones included both in rupi_escrituras and rupi_actas.
I need to use something like "union" in order to include all the distinct elements of both tables rupi_escrituras and rupi_actas.
Could anyone help?
Thanks in advance
Romulo

Yep,
In this query you don't do any join between the tables. So let's get back to the basic.
Take you first query
SELECT CBR_ID,PLT_ID,SUM(COUNT_POL)
FROM
SELECT pcd_irs_id CBR_ID, pcd_plt_id PLT_ID , sum(pcd_amount_lc) SUM_PREM,0 COUNT_POL
FROM seema
where trunc(pcd_registry_date)=TRUNC(pcd_registry_date)
and pcd_plt_id in('U01','U02')
and pcd_irs_id in (55,56)
AND PCD_IRS_TYPE!=4
GROUP BY PCD_irs_ID,PCD_PLT_ID
UNION
SELECT PLM_CBR_ID CBR_ID,PLM_PLT_ID PLT_ID,0 SUM_PREM, COUNT(PLM_POLICY_NO) COUNT_POL
FROM sarah
WHERE trunc(PLM_registry_date)=TRUNC(PLM_registry_date)
AND PLM_PLT_ID IN('U01','U02)
GROUP BY PLM_CBR_ID,PLM_PLT_ID)
GROUP BY CBR_ID,PLT_ID
ORDER BY CBR_ID,PLT_IDThis query is quite near to the result that you need. You are very near to the result just add the filter that you need in the second query:
SELECT CBR_ID,PLT_ID,SUM(COUNT_POL)
FROM
SELECT pcd_irs_id CBR_ID, pcd_plt_id PLT_ID , sum(pcd_amount_lc) SUM_PREM,0 COUNT_POL
FROM seema
where trunc(pcd_registry_date)=TRUNC(pcd_registry_date)
and pcd_plt_id in('U01','U02')
and pcd_irs_id in (55,56)
AND PCD_IRS_TYPE!=4
GROUP BY PCD_irs_ID,PCD_PLT_ID
UNION
SELECT PLM_CBR_ID CBR_ID,PLM_PLT_ID PLT_ID,0 SUM_PREM, COUNT(PLM_POLICY_NO) COUNT_POL
FROM sarah
WHERE trunc(PLM_registry_date)=TRUNC(PLM_registry_date)
AND PLM_PLT_ID IN('U01','U02)
and PLM_CBR_ID in (55,56) --<<<<<<<<< ADDED FILTER
GROUP BY PLM_CBR_ID,PLM_PLT_ID)
GROUP BY CBR_ID,PLT_ID
ORDER BY CBR_ID,PLT_IDand you are done.
Bye
Antonio

Inconsistent SQL results when using View with UNION-ALL and table function

Can any of you please execute the below scripts and check the output. In the table type variable, I am adding 4 distinct object ids, where as in the result, I get only the row pertaining to last id in the table type variable. Same row is returned 4 times (4= number of values in the table type).
This scenario is occurring in our product with a SQL with exactly same pattern. I could simulate the same issue with the sample script I have provided.
Database version: 11.2.0.3 Enterprise Edition, Single node
Thank you.
CREATE TABLE TEMP_T1 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
CREATE TABLE TEMP_T2 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
UPDATE TEMP_T2 SET OBJECT_ID = OBJECT_ID * 37;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T1_U1 ON TEMP_T1(OBJECT_ID);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T2_U1 ON TEMP_T2(OBJECT_ID);
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW TEMP_T1T2_V AS
SELECT * FROM TEMP_T1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM TEMP_T2;
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TYPE AS OBJECT (OBJ_ID NUMBER);
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_OBJ_TYPE;
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
DECLARE
TYPE TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_T1T2_V%ROWTYPE;
TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE;
TEMP_OBJ_TAB TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE := TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE();
PROCEDURE ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(OBJ_ID IN NUMBER) IS
BEGIN
TEMP_OBJ_TAB.EXTEND;
TEMP_OBJ_TAB(TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST) := TEMP_OBJ_TYPE(OBJ_ID);
END;
BEGIN
ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(100);
ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(116);
ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(279);
ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(364);
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('=====================');
FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
END LOOP;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
SELECT * BULK COLLECT INTO TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB
FROM TEMP_T1T2_V VW
WHERE ((VW.OBJECT_ID) IN (SELECT OBJ_ID
FROM TABLE(CAST(TEMP_OBJ_TAB AS TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE))));
FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
END LOOP;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
IF TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.COUNT > 0 THEN
FOR I IN TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.LAST
LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_ID||' : '||TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_NAME);
END LOOP;
ELSE
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('NO ROWS RETURNED!');
END IF;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
END;
/

I can reproduce it:
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.3.0 Production on Tue Oct 30 14:05:39 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Enter user-name: scott
Enter password:
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> select *
2    from v$version
3 /
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
SQL> CREATE TABLE TEMP_T1 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE TABLE TEMP_T2 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> UPDATE TEMP_T2 SET OBJECT_ID = OBJECT_ID * 37;
72883 rows updated.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T1_U1 ON TEMP_T1(OBJECT_ID);
Index created.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T2_U1 ON TEMP_T2(OBJECT_ID);
Index created.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW TEMP_T1T2_V AS
2 SELECT * FROM TEMP_T1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM TEMP_T2;
View created.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TYPE AS OBJECT (OBJ_ID NUMBER)
2 /
Type created.
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_OBJ_TYPE
2 /
Type created.
SQL> SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
SQL>
SQL> DECLARE
2 TYPE TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_T1T2_V%ROWTYPE;
3 TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE;
4 TEMP_OBJ_TAB TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE := TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE();
5 PROCEDURE ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(OBJ_ID IN NUMBER) IS
6 BEGIN
7 TEMP_OBJ_TAB.EXTEND;
8 TEMP_OBJ_TAB(TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST) := TEMP_OBJ_TYPE(OBJ_ID);
9 END;
10 BEGIN
11 ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(100);
12 ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(116);
13 ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(279);
14 ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(364);
15 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('=====================');
16 FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
17 LOOP
18 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
19 END LOOP;
20 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
21 SELECT * BULK COLLECT INTO TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB
22 FROM TEMP_T1T2_V VW
23 WHERE ((VW.OBJECT_ID) IN (SELECT OBJ_ID
24 FROM TABLE(CAST(TEMP_OBJ_TAB AS TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE))));
25 FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
26 LOOP
27 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
28 END LOOP;
29 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
30 IF TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.COUNT > 0 THEN
31 FOR I IN TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.LAST
32 LOOP
33 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_ID||' : '||TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_NAME);
34 END LOOP;
35 ELSE
36 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('NO ROWS RETURNED!');
37 END IF;
38 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
39 END;
40 /
=====================
OBJ_ID = 100
OBJ_ID = 116
OBJ_ID = 279
OBJ_ID = 364
OBJ_ID = 100
OBJ_ID = 116
OBJ_ID = 279
OBJ_ID = 364
364 : I_AUDIT
364 : I_AUDIT
364 : I_AUDIT
364 : I_AUDIT
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> column object_name format a30
SQL> select object_id,
2          object_name
3    from dba_objects
4    where object_id in (100,116,279,364)
5 /
OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
       100 ORA$BASE
       116 DUAL
       279 MAP_OBJECT
       364 I_AUDIT
SQL> Works fine in:
=====================
OBJ_ID = 100
OBJ_ID = 116
OBJ_ID = 279
OBJ_ID = 364
OBJ_ID = 100
OBJ_ID = 116
OBJ_ID = 279
OBJ_ID = 364
100 : ORA$BASE
116 : DUAL
364 : SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP
279 : MAP_OBJECT
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select object_id,
2          object_name
3    from dba_objects
4    where object_id in (100,116,279,364)
5 /
OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
      100 ORA$BASE
      116 DUAL
      364 SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP
      279 MAP_OBJECT
SQL> select *
2    from v$version
3 /
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.1.0      Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL>SY.
Edited by: Solomon Yakobson on Oct 30, 2012 2:14 PM

Materalized view with union all and fast referesh

I have a one view which is very slow. in this view we are joining many tables and many union all queries.
now I am planing to make materalized view
Tell me how i will created view with fast refresh with union all query.
Pls help its urgent..
Thanks
Reena

Refer to the Replication Manual for the create syntax and exceptions.

Replace standard view with alternative view

Hi Gurus,
In CRM 5.0 we were able to replace a view with a different view (whether it was SAP standard or bespoke) by adding the appropriate substition controller details in the Runtime Framework Profile.
We are now trying to do the same in CRM 2007 but we have not been successful. I have gone into the SPRO entry "Maintain Runtime Framework Profile" and created "Z_RUNTIME" which is called in the Business Role. It is set up with the following Work Area Definition:
Application: BSPWD_BASICS
View Set Name: WorkAreaHostViewSet
View Area Name: WorkAreaView
I have tried to replace the following controller as a test to change the standard view:
BSP Application: ICCMP_BT_TIMERC
Controller To Be Replaced: SrvTTimeRep
BSP Application: IC_KNOWS_SEARCH
Replacement Controller: MainWindow
This hasnt worked, the view SrvTTimeRep still showed.
Just to reiterate, I'm not trying to enhance a view, I am trying to replace it with a totally different one.
Any help offered is greatly appreciated, and will be reqarded with points! Thanks in advance!
Andrew G.

Andrew,
The difference is in CRM 2007 is that you don't modify the runtime framework profile globally. Instead each application has concept of a component repository.xml that needs to be adjusted. You actually need to enhance each component where you want to include the view into the viewset. This will then create a Z-component repository of enhancements for the application, including a copy of the respository.xml file. You then adjust the repository.xml using the tools provided to replace adjust the viewset defintion. Now if your view lives in another component you will also have to define the proper component usages to use the view.
I would recommend downloading or getting access to the CRM 2007 OKP materials or taking the CRM UI class which has an example of this method in further detail.
Take care,
Stephen

Using SCORE on top of View with UNION

Hi guys,
I explain what I'm trying to do quickly:
2 Tables: table1 and table2 with same structure and both have a multi_column_datastore ctxsys.context.
1 View: view1
select * from table1
union
select * from table2
if I run:
select * from view1 WHERE contains(view1.COLUMN1,'%textext%',1 ) > 0;
this works fine, I get the correct result.
If I try to use SCORE function I have an error:
select * from view1 WHERE contains(view1.COLUMN1,'%textext%',1 ) > 0 ORDER by SCORE(1);
ORA-29921: Ancillary operator not supported with set view query block
I understand the problem is in the UNION inside the view,is there any way to make it works keep filtering the VIEW?
Thanks in advance

There is no score in the view, so you can't reference the score when querying the view. In order to put the score in the view, you need a contains clause, which requires a value. One method of doing this is to use sys_context. Please see the reproduction of the problem and solution below.
SCOTT@orcl12c> -- reproduction of problem:
SCOTT@orcl12c> create table table1
2    (column1 varchar2(30))
3 /
Table created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> insert into table1 values ('textext')
2 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> create table table2
2    (column1 varchar2(30))
3 /
Table created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> insert into table2 values ('textext')
2 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> begin
2    ctx_ddl.create_preference ('test_ds', 'multi_column_datastore');
3    ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('test_ds', 'columns', 'column1');
4 end;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl12c> create index table1_idx on table1 (column1)
2 indextype is ctxsys.context
3 parameters ('datastore test_ds')
4 /
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> create index table2_idx on table2 (column1)
2 indextype is ctxsys.context
3 parameters ('datastore test_ds')
4 /
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> create or replace view view1
2 as
3 select * from table1
4 union
5 select * from table2
6 /
View created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> select * from view1 where contains (view1.column1, '%textext%', 1) > 0
2 /
COLUMN1
textext
1 row selected.
SCOTT@orcl12c> select * from view1 where contains (view1.column1,'%textext%',1 ) > 0 order by score(1)
2 /
select * from view1 where contains (view1.column1,'%textext%',1 ) > 0 order by score(1)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29921: Ancillary operator not supported with set view query block
SCOTT@orcl12c> -- solution:
SCOTT@orcl12c> create or replace view view1
2 as
3 select score(1) score, table1.* from table1
4 where contains (table1.column1, sys_context ('text_query', 'query_value'), 1) > 0
5 union
6 select score(1) score, table2.* from table2
7 where contains (table2.column1, sys_context ('text_query', 'query_value'), 1) > 0
8 /
View created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> create or replace context text_query using text_proc
2 /
Context created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> create or replace procedure text_proc
2    (p_val in varchar2)
3 as
4 begin
5    dbms_session.set_context ('text_query', 'query_value', p_val);
6 end text_proc;
7 /
Procedure created.
SCOTT@orcl12c> exec text_proc ('%textext%')
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl12c> set autotrace on explain
SCOTT@orcl12c> select * from view1 order by score
2 /
     SCORE COLUMN1
         3 textext
1 row selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 4090246122
| Id | Operation                       | Name       | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |            |     2 |    60 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                  |            |     2 |    60 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   VIEW                          | VIEW1      |     2 |    60 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    SORT UNIQUE                  |            |     2 |    58 |     8 (50)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     UNION-ALL                   |            |       |       |            |          |
|   5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TABLE1     |     1 |    29 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 |       DOMAIN INDEX              | TABLE1_IDX |       |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TABLE2     |     1 |    29 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 |       DOMAIN INDEX              | TABLE2_IDX |       |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   6 - access("CTXSYS"."CONTAINS"("TABLE1"."COLUMN1",SYS_CONTEXT('text_query','query_v
              alue'),1)>0)
   8 - access("CTXSYS"."CONTAINS"("TABLE2"."COLUMN1",SYS_CONTEXT('text_query','query_v
              alue'),1)>0)
Note
   - dynamic statistics used: dynamic sampling (level=2)
SCOTT@orcl12c>

Trying to UNION two views with nested tables

I am using Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Prod, and my objective is to generate some XML. What I have been doing in the past, is to create a view, and then pass that view to the DBMS_XMLQuery routine. This gives me a CLOB that I pass along to the application. A typical object would be something like:
create or replace type XML_UGroup_Member_Type as object (
     username          varchar2(128),
     group_key          varchar2(128));
create or replace type XML_UGroup_Member_List
    as table of XML_UGroup_Member_Type;
show errors
Create or replace type XML_UGroup_Type as object (
     Group_Space     varchar2(32),
     group_key     varchar2(128),
     group_name     varchar2(255),
     members          XML_UGroup_Member_List);
/This particular application will be doing stuff with group information. Pretty simply types - a group with a name and a few other keys, and a list of members. A sample view would be like:
create or replace view xml_department_ugroup_view of xml_ugroup_type
with object identifier ( group_key ) as
Select 'Department',
      'Department:' || orgn_code,
      'Department_' || orgn_name
      cast ( multiset (
           select Username, person_id,
                    'Department:' || effective_orgn
            from directory_master dm, logins l
           where effective_orgn = dd.orgn_code
             and dm.person_id = l.owner)
            as XML_UGroup_Member_List )
         as members
   from directory_departments dd
where dept_include = 'Y';
can select from this view, and I can pass it to the DBMS_XMLQUERY package and get a nice XML document. What I want to is essentially put several of these views together, like
Select * from XML_Department_Ugroup_View
Union
Select * from XML_Portfolio_Ugroup_View;But UNION does not work with nested tables:
ERROR at line 1: ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got SIMON.XML_UGROUP_MEMBER_LIST
What I was hoping to do, was to develop a set of sub views for each of the group "spaces", and then generate a view/object that includes all of the sub views, and be able to operate with that single object.
Thoughts on how to make this work, or on alternate approaches? I have considered calling XMLQuery on each of the sub views and concatenating the XML documents and returning that to the application, but I was hoping to find a more "unified" approach.

I modified my approach a bit - I changed the base views to return an XMLType object, like:
create or replace view xml_portfolio_ugroup_xml
as
Select XMLElement("group",
         xml_ugroup_type(
      'Portfolio',
         'Portfolio:' || coas_code || ':' || orgn_Code,
      cast ( multiset (
           select Username,
            from directory_master dm, logins l
           where ( effective_orgn, effective_coas ) in
           where effective_orgn = dd.orgn_code
              and dm.person_id = l.owner
            as XML_UGroup_Member_List ))) as grp
   from directory_departments dd
where dept_include = 'Y';and then I combined them with something like the following (I expect to adjust this as I learn more about the XML DB support)
create or replace view xml_ugroup_xml as
select xmlconcat(
     (select xmlagg(grp) from xml_department_ugroup_xml),
     (select xmlagg(grp) from xml_portfolio_ugroup_xml)
     ) as GROUPS
     from dualand as I define more group branches, I can add them into the XMLConCat stanzas. I am still open to suggestions as to ways of doing this better or cleaner, but this at least gets the project moving forward again.

Help with circumvention of ORA-01472: cannot use connect by on view with ..

Hi,
Any help resolving the following would be v. helpful.
The Aim
Produce a hierarchical report of all users and the privileges they have via the various roles they are granted.
The SQL
select lpad(' ', level*2,' ')|| granted_role from (select grantee, granted_role
from dba_role_privs
union
select role, granted_role
from role_role_privs
union
select role, privilege
from role_sys_privs
union
select 'All users', username
from dba_users)
start with grantee='All users'
connect by prior granted_role = grantee;
The error
ORA-0147: cannot use connect by on view with DISTINCT, GROUP BY, etc.
The database
Oracle 8.1.7.4 (Yes I know ....)
The Solution
[Thanks in advance]

What if you create a table first
create table role_grants as
    select granted_role, grantee
       from (select grantee, granted_role
               from dba_role_privs
             union
             select role, granted_role
               from role_role_privs
             union
             select role, privilege
               from role_sys_privs
             union
             select 'All users', username
              from dba_users)
Then run the hierarchical report
select lpad(' ', level*2,' ')|| granted_role
   from role_grants
   start with grantee='All users'
   connect by prior granted_role = grantee

Help REPLACE view with 3 union

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for