HELP! Sudden weird behavior in Aperture and MobileMe!

So, I am running the latest version of Aperture and have been successfully publishing many albums to mobileme.
I have several external hard drives connected to my computer, and almost all of my image files in aperture are referenced. Lately I have been importing the images from SD cards directly into the aperture library, editing, then relocating the masters so that i would only store the keepers (i went this route because it was unclear to me whether or not originals were also deleted if i deleted referenced files--the pop up wording seems vague to me). I usually back up the new image files on the harddrives manually, and then back up the aperture library to a vault after every major import. I also wait until I have done this to reformat my sd cards.
Of course, this morning, something happened. We had a power outage, and although i have my entire system on UPS units, i had to shut everything down because the batteries only last so long. I did not have time to perform my usual Vault back up. I had a handful of projects with masters in the aperture library (not yet edited and masters relocated). There is one project I do not still have on sd card so that one (and inconvenience for the others) hangs in the balance.
The situation is this: When I rebooted after our power outage (i reiterate that all hard drives as well as the main mac were shut down safely and properly on battery power), all referenced file projects appear normal, but I cannot see any images in the projects with masters stored in the aperture library. The weird part is that if i put the pointer over those projects, i do get the little balloon that tells me how many versions are in each project. It's like aperture knows they are there, but I don't see them. And another weird thing--the REJECTED images from these projects DO appear when I click on the Rejected Smart Album. And the starred images from those projects DO appear when I click on the one-star-or-better smart album. I don't get it.
I also cannot see some of the mobileme galleries within aperture when i select them. When i went on-line to see my gallery, there is some weird behavior...some albums are acting strange, confusing images from other albums, or not accepting my username and password settings (I know they are right), or giving me a different album when I select one to look at.
PLEASE HELP if you can. If I need to, I can always restart from my vault version of the library and reimport last week's stuff from the sd cards, but i'd rather not do that, not to mention there is that one project i will lose.
I'm here waiting for anyone who thinks they can help!
Thanks,
Heather
Message was edited by: heatherperryphoto
Message was edited by: heatherperryphoto

Hi Heather
I was wondering if I was the only one with this problem. Unfortunately I don't have an answer. I'm running Aperture 2 on a MacBook, with my library on an external drive. The problem is increasing; it seems that most (but not all) recent projects are affected, but none that I created before the problem first started.

Similar Messages

Aperture and mobileme = washed out picture after downloading?

Hi,
Synced a few albums from Aperture to a few mobileme gallery's so a few friends could download the pictures very easy. One of them asked me why i screwed up the pictures because the all appeared to have a washed out look on his pc.
Tried it myself and it's true.
If i download a picture from the gallery and open in in Xee on my mac it appears to be washed out, in preview it looks ok. On a windows pc in the default picture viewer same result.
Opening the file in photoshop it appears to be ok.
Tried to talk to a mobileme support guy but he couldn't help me with it.
test album: http://gallery.me.com/reinoutsmit#100099&bgcolor=black&view=grid

Don't fully understand what you are observing in Aperture. For me originals show Adobe RGB, as do the images seen in the MM gallery within Aperture, and as do Downloads from that MM gallery. (I primarily use SmugMug these days, and not MobileMe galleries).
Secondly, I don't correlate what William said with viewing of a Download -- but would perhaps with Online? Any download should view fine, unless the problem is with the viewing app? And as I said, everything I could view a download with displayed fine.
Third, another discussion, unrelated to Aperture discusses similar issues with profiles -- see:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2272826&start=15&tstart=60
Ernie

URGENT Please help with weird behavior of test suite

Hi All,
I have a composite involving three operations of two different services. The weird behavior comes by the time on which I run the test suite on the EM, if I try to emulate two different operation response from one service, by the time that the flow, tries to emulate the second one, I always receive this error:
part name="summary">
<summary>oracle.fabric.common.FabricException: javax.wsdl.WSDLException: WSDLException: faultCode=OTHER_ERROR: Error writing stream: java.io.IOException: Can only write attribute within a tag.: WSDLException: faultCode=OTHER_ERROR: Error writing stream: java.io.IOException: Can only write attribute within a tag.</summary>
</part>
On the other hand if I emulate two responses of the same operation it works.
Does any one have any idea of how to deal with this kind of test? Which seems a very simple test.
Best regards,

Hi thanks for your response, in detail my problem is as follows:
1- I have a simple composite with two services and three invokes, all of the operations are two ways operations. Here´s the BPEL (Service1 Demandas, operation Actualizar; Service 2 Aviso, operations buscar, actualizar):
<scope name="SINAUT_Aviso_SRV_Demandas_Actualizar">
<bpelx:annotation xmlns:bpelx="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension">
<bpelx:pattern patternName="bpelx:automated"/>
<bpelx:analysis>
<bpelx:property name="LastUpdateDate">9/10/10 9:35:50 AM</bpelx:property>
<bpelx:property name="BusinessId">Scope_151babe7-bc1e-11df-3ca0-0015c5fce8ce</bpelx:property>
</bpelx:analysis>
</bpelx:annotation>
<sequence>
<bpelx:annotation xmlns:bpelx="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension">
<bpelx:analysis>
<bpelx:property name="BusinessId">Sequence_151babe7-bc1e-11df-3ca0-0015c5fce8ce</bpelx:property>
<bpelx:property name="LastUpdateDate">9/10/10 9:35:50 AM</bpelx:property>
</bpelx:analysis>
</bpelx:annotation>
<assign name="Assign_1">
<copy>
<from variable="inputVariable"
query="/client:process/client:input/idDemada"
part="payload"/>
<to variable="Invoke_2_actualizar_InputVariable"
part="payload" query="/payload/demanda/idDemanda"/>
</copy>
<copy>
<from variable="inputVariable"
query="/client:process/client:input/estadoDemanda/codigo"
part="payload"/>
<to variable="Invoke_2_actualizar_InputVariable"
part="payload"
query="/payload/demanda/estadoDemanda/codigo"/>
</copy>
</assign>
<invoke name="Invoke_2"
inputVariable="Invoke_2_actualizar_InputVariable"
outputVariable="Invoke_2_actualizar_OutputVariable"
partnerLink="SRV_Demandas"
portType="ns2:SINAUT_Aviso_SRV_Demandas"
operation="actualizar"/>
</sequence>
</scope>
<scope name="SINAUT_Aviso_SRV_Avisos_Actualizar">
<bpelx:annotation xmlns:bpelx="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension">
<bpelx:pattern patternName="bpelx:automated"/>
<bpelx:analysis>
<bpelx:property name="LastUpdateDate">9/10/10 9:35:57 AM</bpelx:property>
<bpelx:property name="BusinessId">Scope_c235386b-bc1f-11df-3ca0-0015c5fce8ce</bpelx:property>
</bpelx:analysis>
</bpelx:annotation>
<sequence>
<bpelx:annotation xmlns:bpelx="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension">
<bpelx:analysis>
<bpelx:property name="BusinessId">Sequence_c235386b-bc1f-11df-3ca0-0015c5fce8ce</bpelx:property>
<bpelx:property name="LastUpdateDate">9/10/10 9:35:57 AM</bpelx:property>
</bpelx:analysis>
</bpelx:annotation>
<assign name="Assign_2">
<copy>
<from variable="inputVariable"
query="/client:process/client:input/ReferenciaPly"
part="payload"/>
<to variable="Invoke_1_actualizar_InputVariable"
part="payload" query="/payload/aviso/referenciaPlyAviso"/>
</copy>
<copy>
<from variable="inputVariable"
query="/client:process/client:input/estadoAviso/codigo"
part="payload"/>
<to variable="Invoke_1_actualizar_InputVariable"
part="payload" query="/payload/aviso/estadoAviso/codigo"/>
</copy>
</assign>
<invoke name="Invoke_1"
inputVariable="Invoke_1_buscar_InputVariable_1"
outputVariable="Invoke_1_buscar_OutputVariable_1"
partnerLink="SRV_Aviso"
portType="ns1:SINAUT_Aviso_SRV_Avisos"
operation="buscar"/>
<assign name="Assign_4">
<copy>
<from expression="'12345'"/>
<to variable="Invoke_3_actualizar_InputVariable"
part="payload" query="/payload/aviso/referenciaPlyAviso"/>
</copy>
</assign>
<invoke name="Invoke_3"
inputVariable="Invoke_3_actualizar_InputVariable"
outputVariable="Invoke_3_actualizar_OutputVariable_1"
partnerLink="SRV_Aviso"
portType="ns1:SINAUT_Aviso_SRV_Avisos"
operation="actualizar"/>
</sequence>
</scope>
2- My test suite is as follows:
<wireActions wireSource="SINAUT_Aviso_PR_DemandasActualizar_TO_BE_/SRV_Demandas" operation="actualizar">
<emulate duration="PT0S">
<message>
<part partName="payload">
<content>
<payload xmlns=""/>
</content>
</part>
</message>
</emulate>
</wireActions>
<wireActions wireSource="SINAUT_Aviso_PR_DemandasActualizar_TO_BE_/SRV_Aviso" operation="buscar">
<emulate duration="PT0S">
<message>
<part partName="payload">
<filePath>prueba_busqueda.xml</filePath>
</part>
</message>
</emulate>
</wireActions>
<wireActions wireSource="SINAUT_Aviso_PR_DemandasActualizar_TO_BE_/SRV_Aviso" operation="actualizar">
<emulate duration="PT0S">
<message>
<part partName="payload">
<filePath>prueba_actualizar.xml</filePath>
</part>
</message>
</emulate>
</wireActions>
3- When the test suite executes the second operation of the second service it throws this exception:
<bpelFault><faultType>0</faultType><remoteFault xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension"><part name="summary"><summary>oracle.fabric.common.FabricException: javax.wsdl.WSDLException: WSDLException: faultCode=OTHER_ERROR: Error writing stream: java.io.IOException: Can only write attribute within a tag.: WSDLException: faultCode=OTHER_ERROR: Error writing stream: java.io.IOException: Can only write attribute within a tag.</summary></part><part name="detail"><detail>Can only write attribute within a tag.</detail></part></remoteFault></bpelFault>
4- if I change the second operation with the first one(buscar), it doesn't throws any exception.
5- If this is a limitation , how can I test a composite that involves n operations of the same service?
Kind regards and thanks for all of your support

Aperture and MobileMe Gallery

I have a website which was created in Aperture and uploaded to my MobileMe Gallery some time ago. Since upgrading to version 3 it seems that the gallery has lost its link with the Aperture Album. The MobileMe gallery shows 'Sync with Aperture' in the info window but the Gallery does not show in the MobileMe Gallery Section of Aperture.
Is there anyway I can re-link the Gallery and Aperture manually?
Thanks,
Chris

No one able to offer any insight to this issue?
c.

Help! Sudden weird behavior - "out of memory" yikes

I'm new to Logic 8, and working on my first project. Working on a new Mac Pro 2x 2.8Ghz Quad machine.
Everything was going fine, and then all of a sudden the program started acting very weird. In automation mode, I would see square markers instead of the circular ones. When I'd click on a marker to adjust it the pointer would disappear and become a dot, and the machine would hang on me. I tried restarting Logic and rebooting but to no avail.
Now all of a sudden I'm getting "Not Enough Memory!" messages and "couldn't copy these EventS!"
How can I be out of memory? What's happening with this program?
Please help me - I'm on a deadline...

The term I didn't have in my above posting was "automation nodes" - the automation nodes on my project - many of them anyway - are square instead of round.
Everything is moving very slowly (scrolling, switching modes, etc.). If I click on one of those square automation nodes I get the spinning wheel and nothing happens.
Is there any kind of tech support available for Logic. I am ruined here...

Aperture and MobileMe Sync

Syncing photos out of Aperture to a MobileMe Gallery results in missing photos and double photos in the web gallery. Workflow as follows: selected and marked Photos in my Library, clicked MobileMe button, created new MobileMe Gallery, waited sync to be complete, checked result: 305 photos in the web gallery, 435 photos in my Aperture MobileMe album. Seems the sync comes with some bugs and flaws. Help highly appreciated!

I'm still having trouble with the same problem as described. I've followed the instructions as described below which make perfect sense...
@ Rienzo: Currently MobileMe will only sync photos with one program at a time. You need to go to www.me.com, go to the gallery page, and for each album change the setting to sync photos from iPhoto to Aperture. The settings button looks like a light switch on the top bar.
... After selecting an album and the "light switch", I don't see the option listed to chose Aperture. Under the Album Settings dialog, there are three choices under "Allow", two under "Show", and one under "Advanced" non of which allow the selection with respect to Aperture vs. iPhoto others are seeing; where am I going wrong here?
OS-X is up to date as are all applications.

Aperture and MobileMe galleries

Hi,
I have the problem that the sorting criteria of my MobileMe galleries always change during the synchronisation process. I want the newest images to be shown on top. That's why I choose "date" as criteria. When I sync the gallery the sort criteria is set to "manual" automatically and the oldest images are shown on top.
I hoped that the newest update solves this problem but that is not the case It's still the same situation.
It is really annoying because you never know how your images show up in the MobileMe gallery.
I use Aperture 3.0.2 on a Macbook Pro 15'' with 2,4 GHz C2D.
Thanks for your feedback.
markus

I think you are talking about the order of the Galleries here. If so it is very easy to change them but certainly not intuitive to say the least. You need to log onto your MobileMe account through a web browser. The easiest way to get there is: Apple Menu: System Preference: MobileMe button: Account tab: Account Details button.
You then log in with your name and password.
Click on the Gallery tab (sunflower) and you can drag your MobileMe Galleries into whatever order you want. You can also change the main Gallery name here.
Now I'd be real happy if I could make multiple sites and not just additional albums in the same site.

Help needed - weird behavior on 8300

Hi,
I have the Curve for about a month. Lately (for 3 days), the phone's acting weird. It lets me make calls and all of a sudden, it turns itself off. Initially, I thought that the phone may not have enough charge; but today it happened again about 4 times - and I had charged it overnight! I checked the battery indicator and it shows that the phone is charged fully.
Has anyone experienced this problem?
Thx in advance for any pointers.
Regards. -Sam-

I know some issues of 8100 and 8700g with similar problem. But no resolution received so those handsets and my carrier provided replacement to customers for those handsets.
tanzim
If your query is resolved then please click on “Accept as Solution”
Click on the LIKE on the bottom right if the post deserves credit

Aperture and MobileMe - Unable to make galleries

Anyone else having this issue... If I try and make a gallery of say anything that is over 20 photos it takes Aperture FOREVER to upload and then always gives me some error after say 30 minutes saying it was unable. Only after I try uploading the same album a few times does it seem to finally upload. What gives?

I'm also having a problem though slightly different. SInce upgrading to Aperture 2.1.1 now my Web Galleries (now Mobile Me galleries) only upload small screen resolution jpgs even though I am setting it correctly to upload the original files. I've tried deleting the galleries in question and building new ones but I get the same results. I hate to be down on Apple because there's so many people out there that will begrudge them anything but the Mobile Me debacle is obviously not over yet.

SimpleDateFormat: weird behaviors of format() and parse()

Hi,
I wanted to convert a given date to another date with a different timezone. I wrote the code below:
SimpleDateFormat fmt = new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy");
fmt.setTimeZone(TimeZone.getTimeZone(tz));
givenDate.toString() // output is: 2008-05-18 09:38:06.349
Format:
fmt.format(givenDate); // output is: 05/17/2008
Parse:
fmt.parse("05/18/2008 09:38:06.349"); // output is: Sun May 18 13:00:00 GMT+06:00 2008I dont understand why would the logically reverse operation would change the output and show wrong result.
All I want to do is just change the date to a different timezone. How can I get out of this jdk date/time mess?

java.util.Date store the number of milliseconds since 1/1/1970 UTC. It is always UTC and cannot be changed. SimpleDateFormat just allows one to parse and format dates using a particular timezone.

Weird behavior in opening Aperture images in Photoshop

I have found a lot of really weird behavior when opening Aperture images in an external editor (in my case, Photoshop, so I'll use PS to refer to it):
1) If the master image is opened in PS, a new version is created when the file is opened, not saved. So quitting PS without saving leaves you with a new version of the file, regardless of whether you actually saved any changes or not.
2) If a version (not the master) is opened in PS, a new version is not created, either on open, or on save. So in other words, changes to that version in PS when saved overwrite that version, and the previous condition of that version is lost (with respect to versioning).
3) If multiple versions of the same image are opened simultaneously in PS, there doesn't seem to be a way to tell the difference between them in PS, except for visually (possibly meta-data, but I haven't checked that, nor would I want to be forced to). The file names of all versions are exactly the same.
I'm looking for feedback from anyone out there who can explain why this isn't completely quacky version control. I've been using version control almost my entire career (as a software programmer) and here's how I have seen almost invariably version control work:
1) New versions of files are always created upon commit, i.e. saving of the file, not on opening a file. (Do not confuse this with working copies, think about what is present in the repository).
2) Opening / editing any file version is never destructive. Any change to that file version that is saved (committed) results in a new version, not an overwrite to the same version.
Aperture's interface basically has combined what traditional version management has represented separately, that being the client and repository views of a project. They are showing all versions of a file simultaneously. This is fine, but I'm really not liking the fact that some changes create new versions, other changes overwrite versions, and one case, merely opening the file creates a new version, whether there are any changes saved or not. In addition, when working with multiple versions in the editor, the file name and/or interface doesn't give any indication of what version you are working with. Easy to say that's the fault of the external editor, but I disagree -- all external editors are going to work with filenames, so Aperture should produce a unique namespace for any file version so that any external tool will be able to distinguish (visually) one file from another.
Is this completely wacky version management, or is it just me?
Brad
Powerbook G4-1.33GHz-17" / Powermac G4-1.4GHz Mac OS X (10.4.2) PB: 1GB RAM, Radeon 9600-64MB / PM: 1.25GB RAM, Radeon 9000Pro-128MB

Hi Bradley,
Due to the way I personally use Photoshop, I want Aperture to behave as it does.
That's because, with Photoshop, I use layers extensively. Any edits I do (levels, curves, saturation, sharpening) I do on layers. I can delete the layers at any time (or select to show or hide them). Because of this, I actually WANT Aperture to behave the way it does. Once I've done a bunch of edits in Photoshop, if I select again to edit that file in the external editor, I want to work on that specific file (to add another layer, or change one). I don't want another duplicate. I tinkered with this over the weekend, and it worked very nicely for me.
Perhaps you work differently from within Photoshop? Do you ever use layers? If I were to have a bunch of Photoshop "versions," each with 5 layers, I'd have like 5 GB of "versions" for my original 8 MB RAW file, due to the size of PSD files. Yuck

Aperture 3 and MobileMe Galleries created in iPhoto

I wanted to post this to hopefully help someone else should they run into the same thing.
I recently upgraded from point and shoot camera's to a higher quality camera, so I also decided that it was time to upgrade from iPhoto to something better. I decided on Aperture as I am not quite ready to commit to the expense and time to learn something as complex as Photoshop.
Well, the first time I opened Aperture and told it to import my iPhoto library, it worked without any difficulty. But, I noticed something was missing. My MobileMe galleries where not displayed in the inspector window for Aperture. I could not for the life of me, figure out how to get them to show up in there either.
I went to the Apple store and talked to some Aperture users there and no one could seem to tell me how to fix this. It was even more frustrating because all of my photo albums from FaceBook came up in Aperture just fine.
Finally in a last ditch, hail mary pass, of an idea, I went to the web UI for my MobileMe galleries. I figured that maybe if I edited something about those galleries, they would then show up in Aperture.
Well, I went into the properties for one of the galleries that I was not seeing in Aperture, and low and behold, there in the properties was an option to choose what application that gallery would sync to. The only options are iPhoto or Aperture, so I changed each gallery to show Aperture as the chosen app to sync with.
Finally they now show in Aperture, of course, as you might expect, they no longer show in iPhoto.
I have no idea why the Import process does not warn you about this, and / or offer to change them for you, but it was very frustrating.
If this can help someone else new to Aperture to avoid this frustration, then I am glad.

Thanks Richard, very helpful. I wondered why I couldn't see my old mobileme galleries in Aperture.
I have swapped between iPhoto '09, Aperture 3, iPhoto '11 and now back to Aperture. Whilst I love the ease of use and relative speed of iPhoto, Aperture's adjustments and masters/versions handling has the edge for me now that my masters collection is too big for my MBP. And with a clean install of Lion my machine now seems more responsive than it has been for a while.
Changing the setting of each gallery is a bit dull, is there a global 'manage mobile me galleries with iPhoto/Aperture' setting anywhere?

Aperture 3 and MobileMe are now solved?

I am still on with Aperture 2.1.4 and have just had trouble with creating a new MobileMe gallery again, as Aperture remarks after it has uploaded the previews and made the gallery - til there is all fine - it could not communicate with MobileMe. This comes further if I like to made some changes to the gallery within Aperture and try to sync them - nothing happens, only the error comes up. This bug is til I upgraded my system to SL and Aperture 2.1.4. Any idea? Does Aperture 3 still has this bug or is it solved?

Okay ... further to my original note ... has anyone seen this?
Using Aperture 3 and MobileMe ... do you need to create unique passwords for each album?
(that seemed to fix the generic password on multiple albums)
No I have not seen this kind of problem, and no you shouldn't need unique passwords for each album.
I have specific groups that I regularly share sets of albums with. When I create a new MobileMe album, I specify which group has access (or limit the access later via the Aperture-MobileMe album settings). I established the group name (and password) once. For subsequent albums I just specify that group. If I use the Tell A Friend... option to announce a new album, it will share the group/username and password.
IF I enable uploading additional photos via e-mail, that does create a unique/generic e-mail address for each album -- has to as you want any photos to upload to THAT album.
I know this answers your question, but quite likely does not provide a solution. If you can be more specific as to EXACTLY what steps you are taking I might be able to replicate your process and offer a specific solution. Hopefully the pieces I've offered may help you find a solution though?
Best wishes!

I have been working on a wedding slideshow for days and have over 3,000 pictures in albums on iPhoto. It suddenly will not open without upgrading to Aperture and I can't find any of my photos!!!!

I have been working on a wedding slideshow for days and have over 3,000 pictures in albums on iPhoto. It suddenly will not open without upgrading to Aperture and I can't find any of my photos!!!! I need these photos, to complete the video, not to mention I don't want to lose them. I have had trouble ever since upgrading to Maverick.

Try the following:
1 - launch iPhoto with the Command+Option keys held down to open the First Aid window.
2 - Run Option #4, Rebuild Database.

New Mac Pro - Aperture and a massive new project - help me be smart!

I am receiving a Mac Pro 2.66 Friday and adding in 4 GB RAM and 2 500GB HDS, Aperture and Final Cut Studio and a lot of music software. Moving up from a G4 450 DP.
I received a very nice fellowship and will officially begin the project on June 1, continuing until August, 2008. I will be filming in all 92 Indiana counties - mainly nature and historic sites for a few DVD programs for schools in my county. I expect to end up with 30,000 + images when it is all said and done.
Before I begin, do any of you experienced digital photographers have any advice for someone in my position? You know, "what I wish I had known when I started using Aperture" kind of advice.
I use a Nikon D70, 5 various lenses and will shoot RAW. I am an experienced photographer, so I am not looking for shooting tips, etc.
Thanks for any tips.
G4 450DP Mac OS X (10.4.6)

That sounds like a great project.
People have already emphasized the importance of backing up. I can't pile on with any more emphasis. Backup, backup, and backup some more. I have five copies of every RAW file I've ever made across four different disks and DVD's. The DVD's are located in a remote location. I had an issue with my hard drives about three months ago that caused all my hard drives to loose their data--complete loss. If not for my DVD's, I would've lost 30,000 RAW files let alone all the processed images.
I'm working an article on my backup strategy that should be published in the next week or so. If you want, send me an e-mail and I'll give you a link to my site when it's done.
This next article is about file naming. I've been using this same convention for 8 years. It works as well as anything. The other recommendations are also excellent especially the ones about adjusting your convention when sending to clients.
http://www.keiko-ni.com/keikosite/equiptech/digital/filenaming/filename1.html
This final article is about my initial workflow. I am not a "copy the CF card prior to import" kind of guy. Call me gutsy. Metadata and keywords will be your most important friend during a project this size. Being able to quickly get to images for various purposes will be extremely important. To be a high end, high capacity photographer also means being a data manager. It's a fact of life. Secondly, start early and don't get behind keywording. That will only slow you down later. The key to this in Aperture is using the keyboard shortcuts. Learn those. It'll help lost later.
http://www.keiko-ni.com/wordpress/?p=13
Cheers
1.67ghz PB, 2.66 MP Mac OS X (10.4.9)

HELP! Sudden weird behavior in Aperture and MobileMe!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for