Help to increase exporting time?

I have been working on several animated videos (in CS6) for the last few weeks but as of last night, the exporting times have slowed down by up to 4x the usual speed. I am on a very tight deadline and hoping someone can help? I am working on a Mac Pro. Thanks

Hope this helps... answered the questions as best I could
What version of After Effects? Include the minor version number (e.g., After Effects CS5.5 with the 10.5.1 update).
CS6 11.0.2.11
Have you installed the recent updates? (If not, you should. They fix a lot of problems.)
YES
What operating system? This should include specific minor version numbers, like "Mac OSX v10.6.8"---not just "Mac".
MacPro OS X Version 10.8.2
Processor: 2x2.4 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
Memory: 16 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
What kind(s) of source footage? When telling about your source footage, tell us about the codecs, not just the container types. For example, "H.264 in a .mov container", not just "QuickTime".
Multiple.. Mainly Photoshop CS6 compositions as well as .png files and 1 H.264 in .mov container
If you are getting error message(s), what is the full text of the error message(s)?
N/A
What were you doing when the problem occurred?
I am [trying] to export my composition. The full composition is 12min42sec but I have started trying to do sections at a time and am currently export 1min56sec of the composition
Has this ever worked before?
YES. I have export 5 similar compositions prior to the current one.
What other software are you running?
None while exporting.
Do you have any third-party effects or codecs installed?
Yes - Auto Lip Sync
Tell us about your computer hardware. Include CPU type and number of processor cores, amount of RAM installed, GPU, number of disk drives, and how any external drives are connected.
See above for Processor and memory info.
Startup Disk: Macintosh HD
Additional External Hard Drives: 1, connected with Firewire (I am not exporting out or from this hard drive but am using files from it)
Do you have any third-party I/O hardware (e.g., AJA, Matrox, Blackmagic, MOTU)?
Are you using OpenGL features in After Effects?
Not that I am aware of, no
Does the problem only happen with your final output, RAM preview, or both?
Mainly with final output
Are you using Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously multiprocessing?
I haven't been but just turned it on for this last export
What is the exact sequence of steps that you are taking?
File, Export > Add to Render Queue, Settings for Render: Best Quality, H264, Render... wait

Similar Messages

Increase export times

Hi all-
I'm under the gun a bit with a Friday deadline and tons of video to export into h.264 files destined for streaming.
As always, I'm just doing a Export>Using Quicktime conversion with the settings that I like, but the export times are pretty brutal. 20 minutes or so for a five minutes of video. My machine usually runs pretty fast.
One thing that is a bit different is that I'm using some very long sequences. Upwards of 3.5 hours. But, I'm using in and out markers to cut into 3-5 minute clips. My assumption would be that FCP is looking only at the in and out markers, so I don't know why the size of the sequence might matter, but perhaps it does. Maybe I should cut my sequences smaller - though again - I can't imagine why that would matter? Any thoughts on this or other ways that I can expedite a bit without lowering quality settings?
Also, I typically only use compressor when I'm exporting to an mpeg format, but can I use compressor to generate h.264? That way maybe I could create a batch that could render some of these clips overnight?
Any thoughts or advice on how I can pick this up a bit is definitely appreciated.
Warm regards-
David

I figured as much (though I can't really check the export utility now, because I'm in the middle of a brutally long export of a five minute clip).
I'll do that for overnight.
How about while I'm awake? I always prefer to monitor things vs. the overnight batch. In your experience does exporting to h.264 through compressor work faster than through export using qt conversion?
Maybe I'll give that a "go" with one clip once this current job is done and see for myself.

LR4 - Anyone notice slower export times - RAW to JPG?

I read through the "Lightroom 4 is slow" thread - very good reading. I have noticed many of the same issues & hope Adobe is paying attention to that thread!
No one mentioned a slowdown in exporting RAW files to JPG. My average time for exporting Canon 7D CR2 files to full sized 300dpi JPGs in LR 3 is about 5.3 seconds per file. The same exports in LR 4 are about 8 seconds per file.
I can learn to live with this increased exporting time. I'm curious as to whether anyone else is experiencing this.

Yes. For me, Canon G12 & 40D RAW files are taking twice as long to export under LR4 than under 3.6 - 16 secs vs 8 secs after the same processing. But I am also seeing the same general latency problems identified in other threads here. I've reverted back to 3.6 after trying every possible workaround posted so far - LR4 is unusable for me.
Dave

Audition CC's huge export time? (please help)

I just posted this on a much older thread but I worry it will never be seen. I have recently switched over to Audition from Logic. I have designed a soundscape that is approximately 1 minute and 10 seconds long, using about 30 tracks many of which are loaded with effects and automation. I accept that huge export times are exacerbated by things like that, however I still feel like the current time is unprecedented.
This is becoming a serious problem for me. We are about to churn out about 100 - 200 different videos with slightly varying soundscapes and the export time (and inability to queue exports) from Audition will cripple the workflow.
For anyone reading or planning to reply (which would be hugely appreciated!) I press 'Export' and it shows the little dialog box saying that it is exporting, however it stays on 0% for a huge portion of the entire process, and during this time I can see that no file has been created in the destination folder.
Also, I was very keen to queue exports in Media Encoder, so that even if the waiting time was huge at least they could be stacked, however I can't find a way to do this, so the exports must be done one by one. I have obviously searched for a media encoder functionality, assuming I must be missing something, but can't find anything. If anyone at least knows how to do this I would appreciate the information SO much, as the ability to queue the exports up together would really help.
Thanks so much,
Ben.

There's currently a bug in AME CC with 2-pass VBR H.264 encoding.
I'd say to try the export again, using the exact same settings, except change "2-pass VBR" to "1-pass VBR". See what happens.
As the Adobe staff member states in the referenced thread, 2-pass (even if it was buggy) really does nothing to improve the rendered video. It then surprises me that many of their included presets (including the YouTube ones) are all set to 2-pass.

Adding a RAID card to help speed up export (and other drive question) in Premiere Pro CC

First of all, I have read Tweakers Page exporting section because that is where my primary concern is. First my questions, then background and my current and proposed configurations:
Question 1: Will adding a hardware RAID controller, such as an LSI MegaRAID remove enough burden from the CPU managing parity on my software RAID 5 that the CPU will jump for joy and export faster?
Question 2: If true to above, then compare thoughts on adding more smaller SSDs for either a one volume RAID 0 or smaller two volume RAID 0 to complement existing HDD RAID 5. That is, I'm thinking of buying four Samsung 850 Pro 128 GB SSDs to put in a four disk volume to handle everything (media/projects, media cache, previews, exports), or split it up into two volumes of two disks each and split the duties, or keep the four disk volume idea and put the previews & exports on my HDD RAID 5 array.
The 850's are rated at SEQ read/write: 550/470 MB/s thus I could get around 2000/1500 MB/s read write in a four disk RAID 0 or 1/2 that if I split into two volumes to minimize volumes from reading/writing at the same time, if that really matters with these SSDs?
The Tweaker's page made a few comments. One is splitting duties among different disks, rather than a large efficient RAID may actually slow things down. Since the SSDs are much faster than a single HDD, I'm thinking that is no longer accurate, thus I'm leaning toward the Four disk configuration putting OS & Programs on C drive, Media & Projects on D (HDD RAID 5), Pagefile & Media Cache on SSD (2-disk RAID 0) and Previews &Exports on 2nd SSD RAID 0 (or combine the two RAID 0's and their duties).
Just trying to get a perspective here, since I haven't purchased anything yet. Any experience/stories, I would appreciate.
My current drive configuration:
My D drive is software RAID 5 consisting of four 1 TB Western Digital RE4 (RED) 7200 RPM HDDs with a CrystalDiskMark SEQ Read/Write of 339/252 MB/s.
The C drive is SSD 500 GB (Samsung 840 (not Pro) and does 531/330 MB/s. My OS, Program Files and Page File are on C, and data/media files/project, etc all are on the RAID drive.
Problem:
Current setup allows for smooth editing, only the exporting seems slow, often taking between two and two and a half times the video length to export. Thus a 10 minute video takes 20-30 minutes to export. 15 minute video can take 30-40 minutes to export. The first 10% of the two-pass export takes under a minute (seems fast), but it gets slower where the final 10 or 20% can hang for many minutes like my system is running out of steam. So where is the waste?
I have enabled hardware acceleration (did the GPU hack since my GPU isn't listed) and it may spike at 25% usage a few times and eat up 600 MB of VRAM (I have 2 GB of VRAM), otherwise it is idle the whole export. The CPU may spike at 50% but it doesn't seem overly busy either.
Our timeline is simple with two video streams and two audio streams (a little music and mostly voice) with simple transitions (jump cuts or cross dissolves). We sometimes fast color correct, so that might use the GPU? Also, since we film in 1080 60P and export 1080 29.97 frames/sec, I think that is scaling and uses the GPU. I know without the GPU, it does take a lot longer. I have ruled out buying a faster GPU since it doesn't appear to be breaking a sweat. I just need to know if my system is bottlenecked at the hard drive level because I'm using software RAID and my disks are slow and will hardware RAID significantly reduce the CPU load so it can export faster.
Our files are not huge in nature. Most our clips are several MBs each. Total project files are between 5 GBs and 10 GBs for each video with Windows Media File export being 500 MB to 1.2 GB on average. We shoot using Panasonic camcorders so the original files are AVCHD, I believe (.MTS files?).
Considerations:
1. I'm thinking of buying (and future proofing) an LSI Logic MegaRAID 9361-8i that is 12Gb/s SAS and SATA (because some current SSDs can exceed the 6Gb/s standard).
2. I'm not replacing my current RAID 5 HDDs because not in my budget to upgrade to 6 or more large SSDs. These drives are more important to me for temporary storage because I remove the files once backed up. I don't mind a few inexpensive smaller SSDs if they can make a significant difference for editing and exporting.
I can only guess my HDD RAID is slow but the CPU is burdened with parity. I would imagine running RAID 10 would not help much.
My setup:
my setup:
CPU - i7-3930K CPU @4.5 GHz
RAM - G.SKILL Ripjaws Z Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR3 2133 @2000
Motherboard - ASUS P9X79 WS LGA 2011
GPU - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 OC 2GB (performed the compatibility list hack to enable hardware acceleration).
C drive - 500 GB Samsung 840 SSD (Windows 7 Pro 64 bit and programs).
D drive - four 1 TB WD RE4 Enterprise HDDs 7200 RPMs in software RAID 5
Case - Cooler Master HAF X
CPU Fan - Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO with 120 mm fan
Power Supply - Corsair Pro Series AX 850 Watt 80 Plus Gold
Optical Drive - Pioneer BDR - 208DBK
thanks in advance,
Eric

........software RAID 5 off the motherboard ??????......NOT a good idea, from what I have read here on this forum from experts like Harm Millard and others. They have mentioned a LARGE overhead on the CPU doing this....causing sub-par performance. RAID 0 off the motherboard will NOT do this, however.....RAID 0 would provide optimum speed, but, with the risk of total data loss if ANY drive fails. You may wish to reconfigure your RAID to be RAID 0...BUT...you would need to DILIGENTLY back up its entire volume onto perhaps a quality 4TB drive very frequently.
A lot depends on the nature of your current and FUTURE codecs you plan to edit. You may not want to sink a lot of money into an older setup that may have trouble with more demanding future codecs. For now, in the 1080p realm, your rig should be OK....the read/write performance on your CURRENT RAID 5 setup is not great, and a definite drag on the performance. The rest of your components appear to be fine.....the Samsung SSD, though not ideal, is OK.....it's write speed is WAY lower than the Pro model,but, the drive is used mainly for reading operations. Since you have Windows 7 Pro, and NOT Windows 8.......you CAN put the entire windows page file onto the RAID 0 you might create.....this will take that frequent read/write load OFF the SSD. Read the "tweakers Page" to see how to best TUNE your machine. To use your current setup most efficiently, without investing much money, you would :a. create the RAID 0 off the motherboard, ( putting all media and project files on it ) b. install a quality 7200rpm 4TB HDD to serve as a BACKUP of the RAID array. Then, install a Crucial M550 256GB or larger SSD, ( close in performance to Samsung 850 Pro...much cheaper), to put all previews, cache , and media cache files on....AND to use as " global performance cache" for After Effects...if you use that program. Exporting can be done to ANOTHER Crucial M550 for best speed...or, just to the either the FIRST Crucial or, the 4TB drive. Your current GPU will accelerate exports on any video containing scaling and any GPU accelerated effects. Your CPU is STILL important in SERVING the data to and from the GPU AND for decoding and encoding non-GPU handled video....your high CPU clock speed helps performance there ! You may want to check out possibly overclocking your video card, using MSI Afterburner.or, similar free program. Increasing the "memory clock speed" can RAISE performance and cut export times on GPU effects loaded timelines,or, scaling operations. On my laptop, I export 25% faster doing this. With my NEW i7 4700 HQ laptop, I export in the range of your CURRENT machine....about 2 to 3 times the length of the original video. PROPERLY SET UP...your desktop machine should BLOW THIS AWAY !!
Visit the PPBM7 website and test your current setup to possibly identify current bottlenecks,or, performance issues. THEN, RE-TEST it again, after making improvements to your machine to see how it does. Be aware that new codecs are coming (H.265 and HEVC,etc.) which may demand more computer horsepower to edit, as they are even MORE compressed and engineered for "streaming" high quality at a lower bandwidth on the internet. The new Haswell E...with its quad-channel memory, 8 core option, large number of PCI gen. 3 lanes, goes farther in being prepared for 4K and more. Testing by Eric Bowen has shown the newer PPro versions provide MUCH better processing of 4K than older versions.

What hardware helps for optimum export speed?

I'm about to purchase a new laptop, and since I'm often on location, processing and exporting large numbers of processed files in a hurry, I'm wondering what hardware is most helpful. Obviously I'm going to get the fastest CPU possible, and a fast hard drive, but what about RAM? Does the RAM speed make much difference in import, process or export times?
Also, I'm considering a model that has 2 internal hard drives. Would LR export speed be improved by exporting to a second internal drive?. And if so, and one of those drives is an SSD, should that be the primary or secondary drive?
TIA, Steve.

OP here. Thanks for the responses. Thanks especially to Ian Lyons for posting the link to the Optimizing Adobe Lightroom article ( http://macperformanceguide.com/Optimizing-Lightroom.html ). Among other things, the article suggested that export speed could be increased by dividing a large operation into several smaller ones, to best utilize multiple cores and hyperthreading. I decided to run a few tests:
First, I exported 300 files in two simultaneous operations of 150 files each, to two different internal drives on my home computer ( CPU is a 4-year-old Pentium 940 EE 2.4 Ghz dual core with hyperthreading). Then I exported the same 300 files in a single operation. The split export took 5 ½ minutes, vs 11 minutes for the single export.
I know: It’s already a flawed test, because I had introduced an additional variable by exporting to two separate drives in the first test. Since the times that I’m most in a hurry are when I’m on location using a laptop, that test wasn’t of much use, as laptops (with few exceptions) have only one internal drive.
So today, I did a few more export tests, all from and to the C drive:
300 files exported in a single operation: 12.5 minutes
The same 300 files exported in two groups of 150, simultaneous operations: 10 minutes
The same 300 files, this time exported in three groups of 100: 7 minutes
Interesting result, as the article had led me to expect possibly slower results on test #3, due to increased overhead. However, file caching could be skewing the (later) results.
So next, I tried a similar export test in reverse order with different (smaller) files
250 files divided roughly into three groups, processed simultaneously: 4.5 minutes
Same 250 files processed in a single operation: 7 minutes
There still may be some skewing due to file caching, and due to using different files for the two sets of tests. However, it seems clear that for my purposes at least, exporting large quantities of files in several simultaneous operations saves a significant amount of time vs a single large export. Also, the initial test (as compared to subsequent tests) does seem to indicate somewhat faster export when using two drives.
BTW, no resizing involved, apart from the occasional cropped image.

Long export times

My company is moving over to Premiere Pro CC from FCP 7. As a relatively newer user of Premiere Pro CC (2014v8.1) I'm trying to figure out how to set my system for faster exports.
For Example;
I edited a project in 720p (media was shot in 4K-Sony SxS) import and playback were fine until adding basic Color correction. Then extremely choppy playback until I rendered the timeline.
Exported the 14:27 timeline to XDcam422HD 60(50mbps) 59.94fps with a data rate 50.11Mbits/s.
It took 1hour and 18minutes to export!
For an experiment, I re-edited the exact sequence in Final Cut Pro X 10.10.4 (I have a copy on the same machine) Did the same export.
Both Files are identical in size, Mbits.sec, etc. The Export time was 7 Minutes!
I am sure there has to be a group of settings that I am not aware, that I haven't tweaked or modified to improve the export times.
Like I said the company is moving us to Premiere ProCC and I want to make sure I can export nearly as quickly. These export times seem unbelievably long and must not have something not set correctly.
My Sysytem is:
Mac Pro (Late 2013)
3.5 GHz 6 core Xeon E5
Graphics card: AMD Firepro D500 3072
16GB Ram
Yosemite 10.10.1
Premiere Pro CC 2014:
V8.1
Mercury Transit is enabled
13 GB allocated to PPro
Any help would be appreciated as we will roll this out division wide (about 35 edit stations) within a year.
Thanks in Advance
Mark

For those interested, This has been solved by removing the "adjust color" filter from my timeline and using the the "use previews" check box. Render speed increased to just 11 minutes. Thanks

Massive export times

Hello,
Reading the FCP X Help topics etc I think I have a good understanding of import/export criteria. However, I have it from some peers that I could do much better with regard to reducing the massive render times I am experiencing.
Currently the render time for an 8minute clip is 26 hours using Compressor 4 using preset 'HD 1080 Video Sharing (H2.64) - AAC
BACKGROUND:
OS X 10.8.3 (12D78)
17-inch, Late 2008 MacBookPro
2.5 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
FCX 10.0.8
Raw footage is 1920 - 1080 from Canon D7 card - copied to an external HD.
Import settings: both proxy and optimised - both with huge export times as above.
Destination to Movei folder or desktop
The 8 minute sequence includes filters which I know will increase processing time, but by this much is pretty horrendous. (a 'preset' colour correction + sharpen + manual colour correction)
My understanding is that if I import - or later convert all footage - into optimised files - these become ProRes222 files which will give me much faster render and export times. But this does not seem to be happening.
It simply is not efficient or practical to myself or any clients to have 25 - 30 hour export times for 8 minute sequences
My impression is that this computer is simply not up to faster rendering/export processing - but my peers tell me my currrent render/export times are rediculously long.
Can any one advise please.
Thank you.

Phillip,
Clearly, your hardware is not the latest-greatest and your GPU has got to be a weak link in the export process. (As you probably know, FCP relies a lot on the GPU.) However, the times you are experiencing are way over the top. Our 15 inch MBP has only slightly better specs and we've never experienced anything close to what you're relating,
Make a new event with h.264 .mov clips from the 7D.. In a new project, assemble a simple 60 second sequence – no effects of some of those clips Open Activity Monitor, Export and time the export as h.264. Check AM to see whether you see anything weird going on. Then transcode the clips to Pro Res. Make a new project and export as PR 522– again, time the export and monitor.
Neither one of these exports should take longer than 5 minutes. If they do, I would suspect something funky going on with hardware. Speaking of hardware, if you're going to be editing with FCPX this machine, max out the RAM.
Post back with what you find.
Russ

Windows live mail having problum after joining in domain examples incoming is good but sent or outgoing is not there and also send mails are not exporting at the time of live mail exporting time?

windows live mail having problem after joining in domain examples incoming is good but sent or outgoing is not there and also send mails are not exporting at the time of live mail exporting time?

This is not usually related to AD issues, but it may be more of a DNS issue. I posted a request in your other thread to post an unedited ipconfig /all of the DC and of the client.
This may help use diagnose this issue and your other thread's printer issues.
Thank you,
Ace Fekay
MVP, MCT, MCSE 2012, MCITP EA & MCTS Windows 2008/R2, Exchange 2013, 2010 EA & 2007, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Complete List of Technical Blogs: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/technicalblogs.php
This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

Export time in Premiere/ME 130+ hours

Adobe Premiere 6.0.0 and Media Encoder 6.0.0.382 on Mac 10.6.8 using SSD drive for progams and OWC harddrive for projects/files.
I am working on CS6 CC, I finished a 20 minute edit. It has minor levels/3 way color, some warp stabilizer--but nothing external as of yet. I have about 5 video tracks and 10 audio tracks. This is my first export since upgrading to CS6--I am trying to export a h.264 HD vimeo file (tried both 720 and 1080).
My issue is that when I export either from premiere pro or from media encoder, the export time starts at about 2 and a half hours at first then slowly counts up instead of counting down. It has reached up to 130 hours (after exporting for 30 hours) before I stopped it to try a lower quality. I have been trying to export this project for four days. It seems that all three times I tried in media encoder, the time is still adding but the output preview is stuck on one frame (which was a different frame in each export).
I would say that I do not have the fastest and most upgraded computer, but I know that it worked fine before with CS5.

Thank you Joe for responding. I was very hopeful that this would be the solution. I removed all of the warp stabilizers and it appeared that it was working. The time evened out at about 4 hours but was still going up and down between 3-4 hours (at least it was going down at all). I left it with 2 hours left and I have come back to find it like it was before. The time is going up on the "remaining time" and the preview is stuck on the same image.
Has it stopped working? Or is it really taking this long? (And why is it stuck on the preview frame).
Thanks for any help in advance.

I have purchased Asus STRIX-GTX980. Now what should I change settings in Premier Pro and After Effects to reduce export time

I have recently purchased Asus STRIX-GTX980 4GB with i7 4790K.
Now what settings are to be optimized in Pr (CS6) to reduce Export time . Please explain in Detail Please explain in Detail step by step
Now what settings to be optimized in Ae (CS6) to reduce Export time . Please explain in Detail step by step .
The main Motto of noto is to reduce expot times.
Please help me set values .

As Dave says, GPU does very little in AE, see this: GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) features in After Effects
Now, some third-party plugins (such as Red Giant Universe and Video Copilot's Element 3d) do make use of the GPU in AE, but their requirements have nothing to do with AE or its settings.
Premiere, on the other hand, does make use of a GPU, you should ask in that forum what they suggest.
Also, in the future, I would suggest checking on system requirements and benefits BEFORE making a purchase...

Can someone help! PDF export failed claims "pages are too big" they are 8x10??

Can someone help! PDF export failed claims "pages are too big" they are 8x10??
I'm trying to export an 100 page magazine, just a small proof right now and I've done this a million times. There are no errors, all my links are good but still it will not save.
Can anyone help!

Hi marthah,
I'd love to help, but need a little more information to go on. Are you converting from or to PDF, and where is this error occurring (in Acrobat, InDesign, or somewhere else)? What operating system/browser are you using?
Thanks,
Sara

Export time very slow.

Hi guys, i-v read some thems on the forum, but I am not an english speaking person, so it's kind of hard for me to receive a lot of information in a diffrent language at the same time. So I would like to create a new theme, where you probably will be able to help me.
I am using Adobe Premiere CS 6. I have an HP DV7 laptom with the folowwing configuration:
Windows 7 ultimate 64
Intel core I7-3820QM CPU, 2.70 Ghz
8 GB RAM
internal HDD drives 5400 Rpm
Video adapter:
1. Intel (R) HD Graphics 4000
2. Nvidia GeForce GT 650M with unabled CUDA (I mean in Premiere it's shown as unabled)
The premiere is installed on disc C, the info is on Disk D (different HDD from C).
I shoot on an Canon 7D camera full HD 1080x1920, 25 fps. Sequence is the same as camera shooting h264 format.
When I export i select MPEG2 movie, 1920x080, 25 fps, 30 bitrate.
1 hour clip is then exported in about 4-5 hours, what seems extremly long for me...

cc_merchant
Thank you, is there a way to fasten the rendering and export time? What should I look for upgrading my laptop?

Memory pool Code Cache increasing over time

Hi,
We are using JConsole to monitor some of our servers which are running JCAPS. We have a couple of JCAPS applications deployed on these servers. We are using JConsole to monitor this server and we can see that the Memory pool Code Cache seems to be increasing over time. It is around 21M at the moment and has gone up from 18M 3 days back. Is this accepted behavior? Should it not be a varying graph, going down coming back up again?
Any help in this direction is much appreciated.
Cheers,
Suchitra

This might be due to this bug raised for JDBC Client/Server connection
Bug 12969330 : MEMORY LEAK IN JDBC CS FOR CALLABLE/PREP STATEMENT W/ NUMPARM % 4 != 0
There is a leak in JDBC driver which seems to affect only C/S; it does not seem to affect direct or batch. ** This bug has been there since 11.2.1.6.0.
Here are few conditions which are needed for this bug to occur:
1. Application must be using a Client/server connection
2. Applications repeatedly does the following:
1. Create a PreparedStatement or CallableStatement
2. set or register IN, OUT or IN OUT parameters
3. Number of parameters is not an integral multiple of 4. It is the total number of parameters which matter; parameter type does not matter. JDBC driver leaks memory if the number of parameters in a PreparedStatement/CallableStatement are not an integral multiple of 4.
3. On a close 1-3 parameters can be leaked.
If your application deals with above scenario then there is a possible chance of the bug being hit. An example of a scenario :-
The below PreparedStatement has 1 parameter (so it's not an integral multiple of 4):
preparedStatement = connection.prepareStatement("SELECT col1 FROM Tab1 WHERE col2 = ? "); <===== Possible memory leak here
To workaround the bug, you can add 3 dummy parameters -- SELECT col1 FROM Tab1WHERE col2 = ? and 1=? and 1=? and 1=? and set parameters 2,3 and 4 to 1.
preparedStatement = connection.prepareStatement("SELECT col1 FROM Tab1WHERE col2 = ? and 1=? and 1=? and 1=? ");
I've seen this bug a couple of times now. I don't think there is a release yet which includes a fix.

Share and Export time extreme

Started using Final Cut Pro X and I like a lot of the new features. One thing is concerning me is Sharing or Exporting time. I had a 2 hour training video that I needed to export to mp4 file. I tried many different methods using Final Cut Pro X and Compressor and the time on an 8 Core with 10 Gig of ram was 14 hours. I checked the processor uses during the export and all processors were running near max. Unless I am doing something wrong this seems extreme. Any suggestions?

Maybe this could help:
http://www.digitalrebellion.com/blog/posts/using_compressor_with_multiple_cores. html
http://help.apple.com/compressor/mac/4.0/en/compressor/usermanual/index.html#cha pter=29%26section=6%26tasks=true

Help to increase exporting time?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for