Help with banded profile

Hi Guys,
So I have tried all the tests and step-by-step guides, and I cant get my internet speed back to normal. In the past week it has gradually slowed and now it is nearly at a stand still since saturday. Below is my router stats. My router is connected to the test socket and I have my laptop connected to the router via an ethernet cable. Looks like my noise margin is too high, so do I need to contact the BT mods to have this manually reset? Appreciate all the help guys, I need the internet connection to work from home and I am lost without it so I would prefer to get it sorted asap rather than wait for 3 days on connectivity before reaching out to the Mods!
ADSL Line Status
Connection information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
0 day, 01:18:35
Downstream:
2,112 Kbps
Upstream:
448 Kbps
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.1 Annex A
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
15.5 dB / 20.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
57.0 dB / 31.5 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
18.3 dBm / 12.1 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
32 / 0
CRC Events (Down/Up):
0 / 0
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote):
0
HEC Errors (Down/Up):
0 / 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
0 / 0

http://speedtest.btwholesale.com/
using the above website my results were
Download speed 0.05mbps
Upload speed: 0.34
Ping Latency: 51
Download speedachieved during the test was - 0.05 Mbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 0.05 Mbps-0.25 Mbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :2.11 Mbps(DOWN-STREAM), 0.45 Mbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 0.14 Mbps
Ill run the bt diagnostic speed test now and post results. Took a lot of attempts to get it to work last time. The acceptable range above is really low as I was used to approx 6mbps so I dont understand how it can be so low now :/

Similar Messages

Need help with Color Profiles between Photoshop and iPhoto

Hey guys, I'm a photographer and have always used Photoshop in comination with iPhoto. I am having great difficulty lately with color profiles randomly changing within albums of pictures. I need all of my images to be in sRGB, but some somehow end up in Adobe RGB. It seems to happen at random. Apple seems to think it's an Adobe problem. Adobe isn't sure what to do. Anybody aware of any known issues between CS5 and iPhoto using OS 10.8.4 with regard to color profiles and how to fix them?

SRiegel schrieb:
I don't know inkscape, but this article seems to indicate that is will support cmyk.
The article also says you need Scribus to then further process the SVG file.
@shaunamm You need to open the SVGin Illustrator, not place it. But I doubt that you will be able to get the effects in Illustrator.

Help with colour profiles and wide gamut monitor

Hi there,
I know this issue must crop up a lot due to its confusing nature but I would really appreciate it if someone could explain what settings I should be using in Photoshop to get accurate colours. I had a look around and couldn't find any other discussions that answered this exactly.
My set up is a Dell 2408WFP monitor which is wide-gamut. I have calibrated this using a huey Pro calibrator (therefore have an accurate system colour profile). My photos are in Canon sRGB space, set by Digital Photo Professional (obviously easily changed if need be).
What I would like is to be able to preview what my photos will look like on a standard sRGB display. When I open a photo in Photoshop with all the settings on their default it looks extremely washed out, very low contrast and saturation. This is nothing like what the photos look like outside of Photoshop, and also not what the photos look like on other (normal gamut) displays. I have tried using the "proof colours" settings. When I have "proof setup" set to Internet Standard sRGB the colours look dreadful, oranges become blood-red, definitely not what I am getting when I view the image on a standard monitor. If I have it set to Monitor RGB then I get colours that look like my monitor outside of Photoshop -- this is the closest out of the three to the result I am actually getting on standard gamut displays. However I know it is not accurate because I know my monitor is wide gamut and therefore more has more contrast (and this is the case).
So what combination of photo colour space, proof colour space, and proof colours settings should I be using? My main priority is just the Joe Average using his TN panel monitor on facebook, I accept that on my monitor they will look slightly different. Settings for print don't concern me at the moment.
Thanks for the help. To anyone who will suggest that I read up on colour profiles... I have, and I understand them to an extent, but there are so many variables here that I am getting lost (monitor profile, photo profile, photoshop settings, DPP settings, faststone viewer's settings, browser's lack of awareness...)
Andrew

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
thekrimsonchin wrote:
I know this issue must crop up a lot due to its confusing nature
You have no idea.
What I'm reading is that you want Photoshop, with its color management enabled, to display your sRGB photos as they would be seen on a true sRGB monitor - i.e., accurately.
Something to always keep in mind, when everything's set right and working properly: Your sRGB image displayed on your wide gamut monitor without color management (e.g., by Internet Explorer) will look bolder and brighter (more color-saturated) than the same image displayed in Photoshop with color-management. There is no getting around this, because the sRGB profile is not equivalent to the monitor profile. Do not expect them to look the same.
It's hard, without being there and seeing what you're seeing, to judge whether your sRGB images are undersaturated compared to what's seen on other monitors. I do know, as one with sRGB monitors myself, that images can look quite vibrant and alive in the sRGB color space.
What we can't know is whether your judgment that your color-managed sRGB images are undersaturated is correct in an absolute sense, or whether you're just feeling the difference between seeing them on your monitor in non-color-managed apps and Photoshop.
Photoshop normally does its color management like this: It combines the information from the color profile in your document with the color profile of the monitor, which it retrieves from a standard place in Windows, and creates a transform used to display the colors.
To have it do this you would NOT want the Proof Colors setting enabled. It is the default behavior.
-Noel
P.S., I don't recall whether DPP is color-managed, but you might consider using Photoshop's raw converter, which definitely shows color-managed output, per the settings I described above.
P.P.S., Your calibrator/profiler should have put the monitor profile in the proper place and set all the proper stuff up in Windows. Is it specifically listed as compatible with the version of Windows you're running?

Need mod help with ip profile

Hi all,
Ive been having problems with the speed for the past week, i have consistently received speeds of around 1meg until now.
I have a suspicion that my ip profile may be stuck, if a moderator could help that would be great.
Here's my latest stats, i have a bt business hub.
I have always had quite a high noise margin but it has never been a problem.
many thanks
View Broadband Link Details
Details
DSL Connection Details
DSL Line (Wire Pair):
Line 1 (inner pair)
Protocol:
G.DMT Annex A
Downstream Rate:
1280 kbps
Upstream Rate:
448 kbps
Channel:
Interleaved
Current Noise Margin:
15.0 dB (Downstream) 18.0 dB (Upstream)
Current Attenuation:
63.0 dB (Downstream) 31.5 dB (Upstream)
Current Output Power:
17.1 dBm (Downstream) 12.5 dBm (Upstream)
DSLAM Vendor Information:
Country: {0xB5} Vendor: {TSTC} Specific: {0x00}
PVC Info:
0/38
Internet Connection Details
Connection Type:
PPPoA
Username:
[email protected]
Internet Address:
Subnet Mask:
Default Gateway:
217.47.109.250
Primary Domain Name Server:
213.120.234.2
Secondary Domain Name Server:
213.120.234.38
Domain:
Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU):
1500
Gateway Ping:
Successful
DNS Communication:
Successful
Configuration Server Post:
Successful
View Broadband Link Statistics
Transmit and Receive Data
IP
Bytes
Packets
Errors
Transmit:
56398392
318676
0
Receive:
385466716
374617
0
Data Errors
StatisticsCollected for 3 days 18:54:59
Since Reset
Current 24-Hour Interval
Current 15-Minute Interval
Time Since Last Event
ATM Cell Header Errors:
1929
13
0
2:35:30
ATM Loss of Cell Delineation:
1464
0
0
1 day 13:44:42
DSL Link Retrains:
8
0
0
2 days 22:06:36
DSL Training Errors:
8
0
0
3 days 6:12:12
DSL Training Timeouts:
0
0
0
0:00:00
DSL Loss of Framing Failures:
18
0
0
3 days 6:13:14
DSL Loss of Signal Failures:
0
0
0
0:00:00
DSL Loss of Power Failures:
0
0
0
0:00:00
DSL Loss of Margin Failures:
0
0
0
0:00:00
DSL Cumulative Errored Seconds:
262
9
0
2:35:30
DSL Severely Errored Seconds:
31
0
0
3 days 6:13:14
DSL Corrected Blocks:
7369
511
2
0:01:13
DSL Uncorrected Blocks:
2074
13
0
2:35:30
ISP Connection Establishment:
1
1
1
0:02:29
Solved!
Go to Solution.

and heres my speed test results
1. Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
Download Speed
0.24 Mbps
Download speedachieved during the test was - 0.24 Mbps For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 0.05 Mbps-0.25 Mbps. Additional Information: Your DSL Connection Rate :1.28 Mbps(DOWN-STREAM), 0.45 Mbps(UP-STREAM) IP Profile for your line is - 0.25 Mbps

Beginner - need help with custom profiles

I've got 30-day demo versions of both Aperture and Lightroom trying to work out which is best for printing using custom profiles I've had done for a selection of textured art papers for use on my Epson R2400. I've read the printing documentation for both products.
In Aperture, I select print from the menu and open the print dialogue window. Then I open the printer settings window choosing the correct media and switching off Epson 'Color Adjustment' and saving the settings. Then I'm selecting my color profile from Aperture's 'ColorSync Profile' option in the print window and making sure 'Black Point Compensation' is selected. Then I'm pressing print.
In Lightroom 2, I select print from the menu and scroll down to the 'Color Management' tab in the print module. Here I'm choosing my custom profile from the drop down list and setting rendering intent as 'Perceptual'. On clicking the print button the default print window opens and I'm switching off Epson 'Color Adjustment' and selecting my preferred paper type. Then I'm pressing print.
Now I will admit that I'm new to printing with profiles and a complete newbie to Aperture and Lightroom. However, my prints from Lightroom are absolutely perfect, but colours are differing in Aperture prints. In particular, prints are slightly lighter and washed-out. I'm wondering if I might be missing a step somewhere in Aperture? It seems strange that both applications follow roughly the same print procedure yet I'm getting different results using the same profiles and images. I'd much rather use Aperture so I'm trying to seek an explanation for the change in colors.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.

A lot of people including me have had problems in this area. There may have been some problems but in my case I was so absorbed in trying different solutions it is hard to say what worked when.
This works for me using an HP 9180:
1. In the View drop down select Printing Profile and choose your paper. This step is not critical but can be helpful.
2. select Print Image and we will work through the menu in sequence.
3. Select your printer
4. Click on Print settings
Click on the Cover Page arrows and you will be given a number of other choices. Select Paper Type/Quality. Select your paper and possibly adjust the other values but generally I leave these alone unless i specifically want Borderless printing.
Click save
5. back on the print menu select paper size. I usually select best fit next.
6. Select Colorsync Profile and again select your paper.
7. Keep Black Point clicked on.
8. I find that I need to set my Gamma between 1.10 and 1.20.
9. I usually click on the Loupe and check to see if Sharpening is needed.
10. Adjust scaling and width to your needs.
11. I then Print as I have not found that Previewing helps me to improve my Workflow.
It may all seem straightforward but this now works for me.
When this all started there were many saying how important it was to calibrate the screen, many tried this but is still did not help solve the problem. From what i understand all the Canon printers are capable of giving excellent results with Aperture. i hope that you join the community of satosfied users. Good luck.

Newbie needs help with color profiles

somewhat new to digital photography and send most of my stuff to local lab (Costco) when needing to print. I have a mac, with Leopard, and use Lightroom to export to jpgs and upload to the lab site.
Simple enough, but I noticed their site had the icc's available to download. My intent is for lightroom to rendor and export the photos the way their lab will print them.
Why bother to really develop the picture to my liking if it is just going to print differently.
I dont use PS and not sure how I can, if at all, utilize the color profiles the lab provides in LR.
Sorry if I am not making sense, any and all help is appreciated from you really smart people:)
Thanks

See http://lagemaat.blogspot.com/2007/12/mildly-lightroom-workflow-for-printing.html
You can now also use the
LR/mogrify plugin to convert to any profile you want. Much quicker than the photoshop route.
Note that there is no reason to do this if you do not hardware calibrate your monitor. Otherwise sending them sRGB is more than good enough. On a Mac, make absolutely sure that you at least software calibrate your monitor. See http://www.computer-darkroom.com/colorsync-display/colorsync_1.htm
Doing this will already improve it quite a bit, but there is no substitute for hardware calibration.

Please help with paper profiles

I'm trying to set a paper profile I use with my canon i560 printer. I set the profile under printing preferences where I set the print quality, color adjustments and intensity then add to the profile tab under printing preferences. Where I seem to have my problem is I can't seem to bring up this profile in the color management tab in printer properties where lightroom should be able to recognise it under color managed by lightroom,,,,,Bob

Bob, if I understand correctly you've set up a media profile for the paper in the Canon print driver, correct? This is different to the profile selectable in Lightroom's "Print Job" properties, which refers to the output profile (*.icc) for the selected paper. If you don't already have one for the Ilford Smooth Gloss paper it's freely available from the Ilford web site.
To set up a print template within Lightroom specific to this paper, select the image settings, layout and print job options (including the output .icc profile for the Ilford paper if managing the colour via LR) as required, then press the "Print Settings..." button. The Canon printer driver dialogue will open, and from that load the profile you created for the Ilford Smooth Gloss paper. Click "OK" to exit. Now.... on the PC there's also a "Page Setup..." button which also opens the printer driver dialogue. Your profile settings should still be showing in that - check everything's as expected and click "OK" to exit. Now click the "Add" button below the Template Browser and give your new template a useful name. It will now use your selected printer driver profile by default.
I hope this is of help to you. If you use more than one size and type of paper then Print Templates are a real boon.
Alan

Help with IP Profile.

As a customer of BT Infinity for about 18 months I know that my download speed typically averages 37Mbps.
Recently (three weesk ago) I had an issue with noise on the line which took BT just over a week to fix.
Since then, my speed has reduced to 18Mbps.
Going through the BT wholesale tester I noticed that the IP profile for my line is 19.35Mbps download and 20Mbps upload.
Is it a matter of time for the line speed to increase again or has BT manually set the maximum possible speed that I can download at?
Thanks

It takes about 2 weeks for DLM to raise your profile after a fault has been fixed.
If you found this post helpful, please click on the star on the left
If not, I'll try again

Help with Credit Profile - 0CDM_DS01

Hi
I am trying to extract data into the ODS object 0CDM_DS01, which uses 0FSCM_CM_3 datasource. When i check the extraction of this datasource in RSA3, it says, 0 records extracted.
How do i fill the setup tables for this datasource???
thanx
Sujai

Greetings MADDIEjud, and welcome to the Best Buy forum! I can understand your concerns if you are not seeing purchases or points when you login to your account on BestBuy.com. After using the email address you registered with the forum to review your account, it turns out that you actually have two My Best Buy™ accounts. The account that your purchases are attached to is not linked to your BestBuy.com account, which is why it may appear you are not being awarded points. I would suggest that we look into merging your two accounts so that it is easier for you to keep track of your purchases and points. It should also make it easier for store associates to find your account in the future. As long as the two accounts share the same information, I should have not issue merging them. Any points/certificates in the secondary account would transfer over to the primary account following the merge. With that all having been said, I am going to need to gather some additional information from you before we move forward. I will be sending you a private message to gather the information I need and to see if there are any other questions I can perhaps help answer. To check your private messages, you will want to login to the forum and click on the little yellow envelope icon located at the top of the page. Merging My Best Buy™ Accounts Thank you for reaching out to us and for being a member of the My Best Buy™ program.

Help with ICC Profiles

I have downloaded and installed ICC profiles (in Library/ColorSync/Profiles) for several Hahnemuller papers. The ICC profile appears in the Aperture Print dialogue box under ColorSync Profile. But when I hit print and the Epson 2400 dialog box comes up I can't choose it under Presets or Media Type.
How do I get these profiles to appear in the print dialog box?
Thanks, Susan

the Hahnemuehle paper that you purchased should have a recommended setting for the media type. for instance, for the Photo Rag papers you want to set the media type to Epson Velvet Fine art. other papers (like the fine art pearl) use other media types. also, make sure you have the proper type of black in installed in the printer (matte black vs. photo black) for your paper type.
all of this information is detailed at the Hahnemuehle web site:
http://www.hahnemuehle.com/site/us/1724/epson-settings.html
good luck,
scott

Need some help with the colour profile please. Urgent! Thanks

Dear all, I need help with the colour profile of my photoshop CS6.
I've taken a photo with my Canon DSLR. When I opened the raw with ACDSee, the colour looks perfectly ok.
So I go ahead and open in photoshop. I did nothing to the photo. It still looks ok
Then I'm prompt the Embedded Profile Mismatch error. I go ahead and choose Discard the embedded profile option
And the colour started to get messed up.
And the output is a total diasater
Put the above photo side by side with the raw, the red has became crimson!!
So I tried the other option, Use the embedded profile
The whole picture turns yellowish in Photoshop's interface
And the output is just the same as the third option.
Could someone please guide me how to fix this? Thank you.

I'm prompt the Embedded Profile Mismatch error. I go ahead and choose Discard the embedded profile option
always use the embedded profile when opening tagged images in Photoshop - at that point Photoshop will convert the source colors over to your monitor space correctly
if your colors are wrong at that point either your monitor profile is off, or your source colors are not what you think they are - if other apps are displaying correctly you most likely have either a defective monitor profile or source profile issues
windows calibrate link:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Calibrate-your-display
for Photoshop to work properly, i recall you want to have "use my settings for this device" checked in Color Management> Device tab
you may want to download the PDI reference image to check your monitor and print workflows
and complete five easy steps to profile enlightenment in Photoshop
with your settings, monitor profile and source profiles sorted out it should be pretty easy to pinpoint the problem...

Help with Color Settings/Profiles...White's look 'yellow' when exported to PowerPoint as a .png

I am running into this odd occurence and can't seem to figure it out.
First - I am not an expert in the Color settings/Profiles topic but I am thinking there is an issue here.
When I look at this image "McCroreyDigitalLogo.png" in Photoshop the 'whites' appear right.
Then when I import it into ms PowerPoint, the whites look yellowish.
I have done a series of 'tests' and it seems to be that the color profile out of photoshop and the one in PowerPoint are not compatible.
I have reset my Photoshop preferences with no luck/change to the results.
Finally, I did a screen shot out of photoshop and pasted that into Power point. The white appeared correct.
Could use some guidance on how to fix this one. Basically any files I run through PS, when they are imported into PowerPoint, the whites turn yellow.
Thanks in advance

PowerPoint is not a color managed program and can display the color values only in the color space of your monitor without any correction.
Color managed programs like Photoshop correct the color values when displaying them in order to simulate within the color space of your monitor other color spaces, for example sRGB, AdobeRGB, the color spaces of various printers, and etc. For this reason you can not match the color in non-color managed programs to the color of color managed programs but you can do the opposite match the color in Photoshop to PowerPoint.
There is two ways to do this:
One way is if you want the color values in Photoshop to remain the same but be displayed in the color space of your monitor which PowerPoint is using, you can either color proof with or assign your monitor profile to the document.
To color proof choose View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB.
To assign, choose Edit > Assign Profile, select Profile and from the menu choose the color profile of your monitor. If you are not sure what's the name of the color profile of your monitor, go to the Color Settings, in the Working Spaces section use the RGB menu, scroll up and check what it says after Monitor RGB-
Both proof and assign will give the same result on your monitor but the difference is - the proof is temporary and will last only for the session and the profile, if embedded when saving the file, will stay and when open in other color managed programs including those on other users' computers the color space of your monitor will be simulated and for those users who don't use color managed programs the colors could be way off than if saved with a profile of a more common color space like sRGB.
The other way is If you want the appearance in Photoshop to remain but the color values converted to the color space of your monitor, choose Edit > Convert to Profile, and from the RGB menu choose the color profile of your monitor. This will preserve the appearance and also match the colors in PowerPoint but like proofing and assigning you are not seeing what other users may see on their computers.
It is not possible to see the same colors in color managed and non-color managed programs and at the same time simulate how others using different computers may see the colors because different monitors display color values differently. Color managed programs can simulate a common standard color space like sRGB while non-color managed programs can not.
Edit: Have in mind all this will work properly if you have a color profile that describes correctly how your monitor displays colors. What you did as described in your post #6 is assign a color space that may be different than the color space of your monitor. The result is when working in sRGB color space your color managed programs will match the non color managed programs on your monitor but that doesn't mean that the actual sRGB space is displayed and any other color space simulation could be based on a wrong monitor profile.

Help with larger sized voice wlan.... design considerations.... tips...etc...

Hi Everyone,
I'm hoping that you guys and gals can help me with an ongoing problem that we have at one of our sites. We're working on areas of the location due to it's size and phone load. We have an area, that I will refer to as building A, that is roughly a square that is 240' x 240'. The inside of the building has some pallets inside for storage(they allow RF to penetrate through them) and also some metal production lines. There is also a mezzanine / elevated area in the middle that the users can walk under. It's not very large, but it would affect a phone if you walked underneath it while making a call. So, now that I have a brief description of the environment, I will tell you the equipment I'm running...
1 x 4402 50AP Wireless Controller with 6.0.199.3 (MR3) installed.
We currently have nine AP's installed in this area, with 4 up front so that way they cover the office areas better. Most are 1231G's, but some are 1242's.
Since we do not have A radios everywhere (budgetary decision) we are running all of these phones on 2.4Ghz (Yikes! I know!)
The 7920's use LEAP and the 7921's use PEAP MS-CHAP v2 with CCKM enabled on the controller.
I also have 802.1p wired QoS enabled for the voice QoS profile and it is applied to our voice WLAN.
We have conference rooms in the front area that will need to support roughly 20-30 maximum mixed 7920 and 7921G phones in a roughly small area. (Yikes! I know!)
We also have a 2106 with mesh .54M installed, but it is for outdoor AP's and should not be affecting this area.
So, I guess my questions are....
Has anyone ever operated the 7920 and 7921G's in mixed mode?
I'm thinking about separating the 7920s on 2.4 and tell the 7921's to prefer the A band or just use A. This will require A radios / surgery, but we've dealt with different code trains, TAC configs, and even added a few more radios. I think it's time to say we need to redesign this area. It doesn't help that phones keep getting purchased either....
What rule of thumb would you guys / gals say would be appropriate for this phone count in terms of the number of AP's I should use?
Since we're dealing with two different phone models, it makes it hard to simply just read the deployment guide. I know these phones can coexist, I just think we're running into over capacity and problems with 802.11B in the mix. In the conf room right now, there are most likely signals from at least two AP's. This doesn't seem like enough bandwidth for just the 2.4 Ghz range when 20 - 30 phones are in there. Not all of them are calling, but the associations / mgmt traffic alone must be horrendous since the phones are 802.11B
We are going to do a manual survey with a 1242 since that AP will support both phone models. I think we may need to survey twice if we're going to go this route; One survey for the 7920's on 2.4Ghz with a 1242AG and one survey on 5Ghz with a 7921G. I think that will provide the info we need to get the AP's repositioned where they need to be.
What kind of power levels should I be using in an area like that? We've originally had a survey at 50mW, but since then we turned the power down to pwr lvl 3 in some spots due to the additional AP's. I've seen references of roughly 1 AP per 3000 sq. ft at pwr level 4, but that seems overkill.
Can we run mixed power levels on AP's with the phones? Or will that cause one way audio due to the transmit power diffrences in the cells?
I'm thinking that we should pick a power level, survey the -67 cell size at the power level, add more AP's so that way they are overlapped 15-20%, and then actually implement the design. I'm pretty good at getting decent channel assignments in place. I know of non-overlapping channels, RRM, etc. I also have an AirMagnet laptop with an Aironet Adapter. It is good for finding noise, interference, etc...
I understand this is practically a book, but at this point, we've been trying a LOT of different things in order to get this to work properly. I think it's finally time for me to "strongly suggest" that we do the following...
1. Choose ONE phone model.
2. Choose ONE AP model.
3. Make sure to implement the 5Ghz band for all AP's so we have complete coverage.
4. Choose ONE power level for each band. This will affect the coverage and placement of AP's. I'd imagine that we'd need to survey with A first, and then survey with b/g. Typically we can use the 1242 and get about the same cell size on both bands, but 5Ghz is a higher frequency and may not penetrate as much as 2.4 Ghz..
5. Come up with a new coverage map based on a manual site survey with the phones mentioned above.
6. Implement the design.
7. Use it.
8. Try not to have a heart attack when the system actually supports that many phones in that area...
So, please, let me know your thoughts and if you have any suggestions. It would be greatly appreciated. We've been slowly working out the gremlins in the phones there over the past few years. I'm more of a data wireless person myself, but I do have good luck with a low to moderate phone count (usually no more than 7 calls per AP). Once we start doing craziness like trying to get 20-30 802.11B phones to work in the same area on only one or two AP's, then things start to become a challenge, especially when we don't have the 5Ghz cells to help with the bandwidth requirements for voice....
Thank you for your time,
Craig

There's a pretty recent (last few months) Voice over Wlan design guide published (was published for the 9971 phones - but all great advice) and it recommends just about all the settings required for an off the shelf wireless voice network.
http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/9971_9951_8961/7_1_3/english/deployment/guide/9971dply.pdf

Infinity Banded Profile

I am wanting to know if BT Infinity has banded profiles. I ask as my downstream line rate has recently dropped since installing a Home Hub 5 and from high 40's down to 35, well 34999 downstream rate according to the modem. What is odd is if I reset the modem it seems to sync back to 34999, coincidence or is something limiting the line rate. It looks like interleaving has also enabled as the attainable rate has dropped from 50+ to 45.   I remember before getting infinity with a previous supplier that after a line fault the profile got stuck somehow and a handed profile was applied which somehow limited what it could connect above.
I cannot help but think the line speed drop is as a result of using the home hub 5 but could be wrong, is there any easy way to see if I am on a banded profile, is this something that could be checked somewhere?
Cheers

I thought this may have been a modem problem so I have put back the BT Modem, so the HH5 is no longer using the inbuilt modem. The details from the BT modem is showing the same download rate of 34999.
Below are the stats from the BT modem:
Max: Upstream rate = 9545 Kbps, Downstream rate = 45636 Kbps
Bearer: 0, Upstream rate = 9357 Kbps, Downstream rate = 34999 Kbps
Link Power State: L0
Mode:   VDSL2 Annex B
VDSL2 Profile:  Profile 17a
TPS-TC:   PTM Mode(0x0)
Trellis:  UN /DN
Line Status:  No Defect
Training Status: Showtime
  Down  Up
SNR (dB): 7.4   6.1
Attn(dB): 21.8   0.0
Pwr(dBm): 13.6   6.8
   VDSL2 framing
   Bearer 0
MSGc:  18  28
B:  47  238
M:  1  1
T:  61  33
R:  16  16
S:  0.0436  0.8124
L:  11736  2511
D:  1485  1
I:  64  255
N:  64  255

3072kbps Banded profile not lifting after 5 days.

As the title sais, I'm stuck on a banded profile and it doesn't seem to be wanting to budge.
I've been in sync now for 137 hours with no drops or disconnects.
My speeds are usually up in the 3800-4200kbps range and I've never had a problem with line stability or disonnections that could have caused it prior to the banding taking place.
My only guess is family members unplugging the router overnight when it's not being used, which I've stated over and over again too them that they shouldn't unplug it. but no one seems to listen
Not sure how the process goes on the forums nowadays but If there is a mod I can contact who's willing to unband my line manually (If possible) then I'd be extremely grateful, thanks.
If you felt my post was informative and helpful then please click the star below my name/avatar.
Cheers!

Hi Welcome to the community forums
Here is a basic guide to getting help from the community members done by CL Keith Please read through the link posted http://forumhelp.dyndns.info/speed/first_steps.html
once you have posted the information asked for then the community members can help you more
if using a hub 4 locate these lines located in the hub logs
Lines should look like this
19:11:29, 07 Nov. (2290101.460000) DSL noise margin: 7.00 dB upstream, 6.10 dB downstream
19:11:29, 07 Nov. (2290101.390000) DSL line rate: 448 Kbps upstream, 288 Kbps downstream
Thank You
This is a customer to customer self help forum the only BT presence here are the forum moderators
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Help with banded profile

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for