HH3::Enable ping response on WAN interface- there ...

HH3::Enable ping response on WAN interface- there must be an easier way!!
only way I've managed to get this working is to connect an old Buffalo Airstation via Ethernet, enable Ping response on its WAN interface and then assign the Buffalos WAN IP to the DMZ in the HH3
DISCLAIMER: although I work in the industry I do not work for BT and any opinions given are purely my own.

Apple's website is acting up.
Open AirPort Utility on your Mac
Click on the Time Capsule icon, then click Edit
Click the Base Station tab at the top of the window
Enter a check mark in the box next to Allow Setup over WAN
Click Update
If you do not see this option, the Time Capsule is not acting as the router for the network....another device is performing routing duties.

Similar Messages

RV120W WAN interface doesn't automatically re-enable after WAN connection is restored

I found that RV120W WAN interface doesn't automatically re-enable after a cable pull and re-plug. I have to go into the Status->System Summary and click the "Enable" button. Is this normal on this router? Can I prevent that from happening? I would hope this is NOT normal as this would mean that I would have to be on-site and login to the web interface to re-enable it after a power failure or WAN link loss.

Tekliu,
Thanks for the response. But, as I mentioned in my prior post, this is, unfortunately, the designed behavior for this device, at least with a static IP and no ISP login. Cisco Small Business Customer Support was clear on this and didn't even open a ticket. I asked that they submit a feature request to change this behavior in a future release. Of course, they couldn't make any promises.
One possible source of confusion is the different circumstances that can occur. In my testing, the interface does come back up automatically on a soft reboot. It also comes back up automatically if both the RV120W and the upstream (WAN) device are power cycled together. I believe this is because the upstream device comes up much faster and is up before the RV120W. The case we are talking about is when the upstream device is cycled or the cable is pulled while the RV120W stays up. In this case, the WAN port remains disabled until you manually select the button on the status page.
Thanks again for following up on this.

Can't telnet on WAN interface, ping is ok

Hi all,
I'm not able to telnet to cisco1841 on WAN interface...( Connection timed out; remote host not responding )
telnet from inside network to LAN interface is fine
I can ping the WAN interface
port 23 appears to be closed ( nmap )
Does anyone have an idea why telnet is not working??
part of my config ( 2 wan links for redundancy, can't telnet to none of them):
interface FastEthernet0/0
description ##### LINE TO LAN #####
ip address 192.168.8.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
ip tcp adjust-mss 1412
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/1
description ##### TO CABLE MODEM #####
ip address dhcp client-id FastEthernet0/1
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
interface ATM0/0/0
no ip address
load-interval 30
atm restart timer 300
no atm ilmi-keepalive
dsl operating-mode auto
pvc 8/48
encapsulation aal5mux ppp dialer
dialer pool-member 1
interface Virtual-PPP1
ip address negotiated
ip mtu 1452
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
no cdp enable
no ppp chap wait
ppp pap sent-username user password pass
pseudowire 212.25.127.15 1 pw-class dialer_to_bezeqint
interface Dialer0
ip address negotiated
ip mtu 1452
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
encapsulation ppp
load-interval 30
dialer pool 1
dialer idle-timeout 200000
no cdp enable
ppp pap sent-username user password pass
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Virtual-PPP1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 50
ip route 212.25.127.15 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/1 dhcp
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source route-map ADSL_NAT interface Dialer0 overload
ip nat inside source route-map CABLE_NAT interface Virtual-PPP1 overload
route-map ADSL_NAT permit 10
match interface Dialer0
route-map CABLE_NAT permit 10
match interface Virtual-PPP1
control-plane
line con 0
login local
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
privilege level 15
logging synchronous
login local
transport input telnet
end

Friend, I recommend you use the settings below, I'm doing like this below I have no problem, look no free access telnet use SSH,
An ace
access-list 10 permit you ip
access-list 10 deny any
line con 0
password you password
login local
length 0
line aux 0
password you password
login local
line vty 0 4
access-class 10 in
exec-timeout 0 0
privilege level 15
password you password
login local
length 0
transport input telnet ssh
line vty 5 15
access-class 10 in
privilege level 15
password you password
login local
length 0
transport input telnet ssh

DHCP disable on WAN interface

Hello,
I have a cisco router 1721, IOS 12.4(25a)
I enabled dhcp server for my local LAN, and I setup my WAN interface as dhcp interface.
My ISP told me that my router is acting as dhcp server on WAN interface...and is not good for them. Can I stop my cisco router from sending dhcp offers on WAN interface, but send dhcp offers for my local LAN ?
ip dhcp pool LOCAL
   import all
   network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
   dns-server 193.x.x.x
   default-router 192.168.1.222
   domain-name appt.ro
   lease infinite
ip dhcp pool host1
   host 192.168.1.11 255.255.255.0
   client-identifier 0100.0ee8.e23d.94
interface FastEthernet0
mac-address 0019.66b3.d689
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
speed auto
full-duplex
FastEthernet0 is my WAN interface.
Thanks!

I imagine that clients on the WAN side are sending requests with a GIADDR field that matches your DHCP pool's scope. In that case, the router would handout an address. You could add an ACL to the WAN interface to block incoming udp/68 packets:
access-list 101 deny udp any any eq 68access-list 101 permit ip any any!interface FastEthernet0 ip access-group 101 in
That should prevent the router from seeing the client requests while still being able to get server responses.

Cisco RV180 VLAN tagging WAN interface

Is there by any chance in the future firmware update that this product (RV180) will be able to support VLAN tagging on WAN interface like the Cisco's RV315W router? ISP in Singapore (Singtel) and Malaysia(Unifi) (http://klseet.com/index.php/mikrotik/mikrotik-rb750-750g/setup-for-unifi) requires certain type of vlan tagging on the WAN interface for it to work.
Is there any workaround to this?

I tried with only two vlans and set the DHCP active only for the office "vlan2". Computers receive the correct ip but some of them won't register on the network, i tried to set the ip manualy on the computers but that computer will still be isolated.
Ex: computer A receives ip 192.168.10.25, Subnet 255.255.255.0, Gateway 192.168.10.1, for 2-3 minutes i can access the router on 192.168.10.1 and the internet, after a random time interval the gateway won't even respond to ping.It's not from firewall related issues as i set to accept all both incoming and outgoing. If i set a manual ip corresponding to vlan1 "default" everything works.It's like that computer is isolated so i believe it has to do with the asignment of Tagged, untagged and Excluded settings on the vlans.

PING TO ACE VLAN INTERFACES

Hi,
I am not able to ping the VLAN interfaces defined on the ACE devices unless directly connected to the subnet.
I tried options - defining Access-list,service-policy.I can ping the servers behind the ACE but i cannt ping the ACE vlan interface.
I captured the traffic on the ACE.I cannt see any traffic on the interfaces if i ping the VLAN ip address.I can see the traffic if i am pinging the host behind the ACE.
Is there any option available to enable icmp on the interfaces.

In order to ping the Vlan Interface you just need management policy applied to the vlan interface.
Class-maps used in the management-policy
defines the source addresses from where these management accesses are allowed.
If you can ping the interfaces from locally connected subnets but not from the remote subnets then there could be 2 reasons.
1. Some routing issues
2. Source IPs in Management class maps are not defined.
Following is an example of typical management policy
#Allow telnet & SSH from these ip addresses
#Allow ICMP from any source
class-map type management match-any MGMT-CLASS
10 match protocol telnet
20 match protocol ssh
30 match protocol icmp any
policy-map type management first-match MGMT-POLICY
class MGMT-CLASS
permit
interface vlan 10
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.0
service-policy input MGMT-POLICY
no shutdown
interface vlan 20
ip address y.y.y.y 255.255.255.0
service-policy input MGMT-POLICY
no shutdown
Syed Iftekhar Ahmed

Ping response

Please be gentle with me thiss is my first post and I'm not really sure if I'm in the right place - if I'm not let me know and I'll repost!!
I have an iMac with a time capsule that I am using for back-up extra storage and wireless internet, I think I have the wireless bit sorted with the security protocols etc but..... when I use GRC (www.grc.com) to check my security it reports that everything is ok but.......I am responding to pings!! only when connected wirelessly!! that indicates it is the time capsule configuration that is causing my problem!! can anyone tell me how to stop my time capsule responding to pings??
Thank you

Hi Andrew, thanks for the reply, I thought a ping response located your computer on the internet!! therefore allowing others to gain access to it!! (not a network specialist so this is all new to me!!) I have been into the firewall settings, guess I'll go back and have another look at them!! this perceived problem only occurs when I am connected through the airport, using the cable directly it doesn't happen!! I have had a look at my modem settings but there are no user definable parameters so I cant stop the modem responding this leads me to think its the airport causing my 'problem'
Mick

Waas Expresss need to be supported on 2 Wan Interfaces

Dear Team,
We have 1941 Router on our branch side currently its not supporting to enable the WAAS on our two wan interfaces.
Current Image: 15.1
Planning to upgrade to 15.2
My current IOS is c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M3.bin and Kindly suggest whether c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-4.M1.bin image will support to enable the waas on 2 wan interfaces?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Ranjith

Hi,
We can enable Waasfeture on 2 two interfaces in 15.2 3T cisco ios.
Regards,
Ranjith

WRVS-4400N no IPv6 on WAN Interface

Currently the WRVS-4400N will only support IPv6 limited.
Is there a time line when this device will support IPv6 also on the WAN Interface? I want to move over to IPv6 complete and get rid of IPv4.
PLEASE!!! START TO SUPPORT IPv6 FULL ON EVERY DEVICE!!
Best regards,
Torsten

In the meantime I have seen that the RV220W will full support IPv6.
I think about to trash the WRVS and move over to RV220W.
EDIT:
http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=11973&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30
Check out the last posting pls.
I don't understand why CISCO support will give such comments. From my point of view this will say everything about the future of the WRVS device.
Thanks!

WRVS4400n v1.1 VLAN on WAN interface

Hi,
Been trying to figure out howto create VLAN's on the WAN interface of the WRVS4400n. Is this even possible with the factory firmware?

Dear Steve,
Thank you for your reply.
The router already has the lastest firmware, 1.1.13
The situation is as follows. Our office gets several services over fiber which is switched to coper over an end node (not protocol just light <-> electric) so essentially we are connected to the internet over ethernet.
Anyway, our provider is rather mysterious over how their services work and preffer that everybody uses the equipment provided by them. The equipment is rather cheap and limited in functionality, also we're having a few problems because the equipment doesn't allow us to switch certain functions off.
We get 3 services from our provider.
1. Internet (VLAN tagged 12)
2. VPN like closed connection between locations (VLAN's tagged 123 and tagged 124)
3. SIP (VLAN untagged 13)
So I did A little investigation and came up with the following.
* For internet services they're using a PPPoE tunnel, this tunnel is established over a tagged VLAN 12.
* VLAN's 123 and 124 are for ourselves, so just connection between our offices. I don't know what the infrastructure/setup is behind this service but it somehow magically works.
* Then finally there's the SIP services which is done over VLAN 13 untagged.
So what I need todo is create a PPPoE tunnel over VLAN 12 (for internet access) and also setup VLAN's 13, 123 an 124 to be forwarded to specific ports on the the router.
/edit:
When I look at the settings in the web interface I only get the VLAN settings for ports 1 to 4 and WLAN (no port 0). I'm pretty sure this router does support it and I could set it if I had a shell on the device but I don't and I'm not seeing it in the webinterface either.

% WAN interface is DSL

I've got a C860VAE and I'd like to use the G1 interface for internet connectivity via Ethernet but when the "no shutdown" command is issued I get the following error:
% WAN interface is DSL
I'm guessing there's a way to switch between DSL and Gigabit...any ideas?
Thanks

I've got a C860VAE and I'd like to use the G1 interface for internet connectivity via Ethernet but when the "no shutdown" command is issued I get the following error:
% WAN interface is DSL
I'm guessing there's a way to switch between DSL and Gigabit...any ideas?
Thanks

Remote connection established - delayed ping responses - why??

When we have established a remote session with Cisco RAS it takes a long time - 30 secs to a minute - until we start to receive ping responses from a server on the network. Any ideas?

There is nothing wrong with the configuration because connection is established. With Ping command the normal response occurs in 1 to 10 seconds, depending on network traffic. But in you case it is taking more than 30m sec. this may occur due to big length cable use or traffic. To determine if ping is getting delay looked at the CPU.

Meaning of Ping Response?

Dear All,
I am getting different kind of ping responses..May i know the meaning of the same.
1. QQQ
2.MMM
3.........
4.????
5.&&&&
6.UUUU
7.restrict in hardware
Otherthan that is there any ping response.
Advance in thanks
Tks&Rgds
Senthil

Hi,
Below are the symbols you can interpret for ping output
Each exclamation point indicates receipt of a reply.
Each period indicates the network server timed out while waiting for a reply.
U
A destination unreachable error PDU was received.
Q
Source quench (destination too busy).
M
Could not fragment.
Unknown packet type.
Packet lifetime exceeded.
Regards
Hitesh Vinzoda
Please rate helpful posts

Multiple DMVPN Instances on Same WAN Interface

Hi Folks,
Is it possible to run Multiple DMVPN Instances on a single WAN Interface ? Can we for example configure 3 Tunnels on a Router using one same WAN Interface but running separate EIGRP Instances for each Tunnel ? Kindly let me know , Alioune

Hi Alioune,
Yes you can create DMVPN as you said with one WAN interface that is possible..... you can have multiple tunnel interfaces pointed to a WAN interface as the source interface which resides in public zone..... with different public ip's as the destination tunnel...
interface Tunnel1
description ** A-VPN Tunnel **
bandwidth 100000
ip vrf forwarding red
ip address 10.0.252.2 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1500
load-interval 60
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 (WAN Interface)
tunnel destination 1.1.1.1
tunnel protection ipsec profile dmvpn
interface Tunnel1
description ** B-VPN Tunnel **
bandwidth 100000
ip vrf forwarding red
ip address 10.0.252.5 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1500
load-interval 60
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 (WAN Interface)
tunnel destination 2.1.1.1
tunnel protection ipsec profile dmvpn
like the above..... shown sample...
Please rate if the given information helps!!!

Add Additional IP Addresses to WAN Interface on SRP527W

Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to add an additional IP addresses to the WAN interface on a SRP527W.
We are connecting to an ISP which assigns us a static IP address with our ADSL account. We also have another 2 additional WAN IP addresses that we have purchased from out ISP and wish to add them as Aliases to the WAN interface and use for other services. I would also like to use those additional IP addresses to create port forwards to our internal network.
I cannot find how to do this in the manual any where and any help would be much appreciated.
Regards
Craig

Hi Craig,
Unfortunately, this is not possible with the SRP520.
[For others reading this thread, this is possible with the SRP540]
Regards,
Andy

HH3::Enable ping response on WAN interface- there ...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for