Hi christophe Same Badi

Hi christophe,
In BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI in SRM..........
In REFFIELD1 u told to give as po_item..it is giving error ?
and for REFVAL1 we pass 00001 directly
i.e, ...REFVAL1 = '0001'.
...REFFIELD1 = PO_ITEM.
IS it true?
it is giving error.
Thanks in advance

Ravi,
On which object are you working ? a Purchase Order, isn't it ?
By what is composed a PO ? By a header, items, partners, accounting, documents, texts, tax, and so on.
Your goal is to send the item catalog ID to R/3 PO item, isn't it ?
So in this BADI, you must loop on the incoming item table, and for each PO item you must append a customer field to pass each item catalog ID.
SRM PO items have a GUID, an internal PO item number(10, 20, 30...) and an external PO item number = R/3 PO item number (numeric field of 5 positions).
So in your incoming item table IT_ITEM, you can find this field, which correspond to field CT_BAPI_POITEM-PO_ITEM. CT_BAPI_POITEM is the target table with the format wanted by R/3 BAPI_PO_CREATE.
So you must pass the R/3 item number in this ref field (use IT_ITEM-NUMBER_INT or CT_BAPI_POITEM-PO_ITEM).
Rgds
Christophe

Similar Messages

Can the same BADI be called in ESS and Backend ?

Can the same BADI be called in ESS and Backend ? For Eg. HR_IN_LOANS_VALIDATE

What verson of iPhoto did your MacBook Pro come with? If it was iPnoto 8 (09) or earlier you will have to purchase iPhoto 9 (11) from the App Store. If your MBP came with iPhoto 9 preinstalled you should be able to update to 9.4.1 without charge.
However, as Niel pinted out the iPad iPhoto is a different animal (pun intended) entirely and will have to be purchased.
OT

Problem printing with HP Photosmart 7520 printer. Same bad result independent of advanced settings.

How can it be that, no matter what settings (advanced, custom, PS manages color, Printer manages color,...) I get the same terrible result for a reference photo (dull, colorless)? It is as if the PS CS6 is not controlling anything with these settings. Is there something else I need to set to make this work? (Old HP Photosmart 7960 works fine, but they stopped manufacturing new photo cartridges). The 7520 all-in-one makes copies of graphics with excellent, accurate color rendition so it is something with the settings for the printer. The device can print good color. HP support says its Photoshop settings. I don't know what it is.
Thanks for your help.
-Jeff

Hi Pirazok,
Welcome to the HP Forums.
I am going to give you a document that deals with when the Printer Does Not Maintain Wireless Connection. This document covers a wide span of troubleshooting steps that I think may help with the issue you seem to be having.
If the troubleshooting does not help resolve your issue, I would then suggest calling HP's Technical Support to see about further options for you. If you are calling within North America, the number is 1-800-474-6836 and for all other regions, click here: click here.
Thanks for your time.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" at the bottom of this post to say “Thanks” for helping!
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
W a t e r b o y 71
I work on behalf of HP

Two people gave the same bad advice and it's costing me $300+

So I have phone on my plan that was stolen and I want to have it removed from the plan. I call Verizon and am told that if I get a tablet, it can replace the phone and I won't be charged the early termination fee. Sounds good, right? So I get the ipad and it's added to my plan. I call last week to have the replacement done and the rep says everything is cool. The deletion/switch has been done. Well, I go online to check to make sure and the phone is still on there. I call Verizon Wireless and am first told sure it can be done and then after being on hold for a while, am told it can't happen because I bought the ipad on the Edge program and that it was going to cost me $300 to remove the line that wasn't being used. When I mentioned that two people had told me it could be done (with no mention of Edge) the rep had nothing to say - - no sorry for the misunderstanding - - nothing. So I'm stuck with an ipad I don't necessarily need and the fee that I was told by two people I wouldn't be charged.
****** doesn't begin to describe how I'm feeling.

It's not that I have a problem with the ipad. That is fine. The problem for me is that I was told that I could replace an iphone 4 with the ipad and not be charged the service fee (keep in mind from two verizon reps). Now it looks like I will be $300 for a phone that costs me 99 cents because I was given misinformation. And what really ****** me off is that the rep I talked to this morning first told me that someone was making the change and then came back and said it couldn't be done. He never apologized for the miscommunication or anything. I did ask that the line be taken off and the $300 added to my bill. I'm going to check again tomorrow and if it's not been done I will move every bit of my business to another carrier who has agreed to pay any early termination and transfer charges. More than anything, I am really disappointed with the customer service. In addition to cell service, I have home phone, cable and internet with Verizon and this has really made me rethink continuing my busines with you.

Using the same instance of a BADI in another transaction

Hello Everyone,
I have a SAP standard transaction which has an authorization BADI implemented. I developed another report which is similar to the before mentioned SAP report with a different transaction. The same BADI is called in the custom report also, because of a common function module (which has this BADI call). So, that means, the same instance of BADI is being called in the custom report also. The authorizations to display the data for both the transactions should be same.
Should I specifically call this BADI again in custom report or will all the authorizations be linked to the new transaction as well?
Thank you all in advance.
Rushi

The BADI call is nothing but a call to specific methods in the customer BADI implementation. So it should work from wherever it is called, even from customer programs copied from standard SAP code where the original call is made.
But I wonder why do you need to make a copy of SAP code.

Are new MB replacements using the same batch of bad 8600M chips?

My Macbook Pro Santa Rosa from 2007 just died yesterday. I brought it in for Logic Board replacement. It'll cost some days of productivity. But two things occur to me:
1. Do these replacement logic board use the same batch of dodgy nVidia 8600M chips? If that's the case, then anyone getting them replaced is essentially getting a chip that will eventually fail again within 2-3 years. And that's just not a real solution but just a temporary fix. It looks likely because one of my friends had his replacement Logic Board fail within 8 months of its replacing.
2. While the extension of coverage for this problem is a generous gesture on Apple's part, people who have invested in Applecare are not getting any real benefits for this issue from their investment. They're going to be just as much in the cold as everyone else once support is EOL on this item. Shouldn't there be an extension of Applecare as well? Or maybe a discount on a newer model?
I really expected this investment to work at least 6-8 years. Now it looks like it's closer to 4. I'm very nervous about using a machine that I know will at some point just fail again. And I'm just not in a position to sell this one and buy a newer one.

If you read the support documentation, you learn they "may" use refurbished parts. But that does not mean necessarily it would be the same bad batch.
It would certainly not reflect well on them if it is a bad batch. However, if your read my FAQ*:
http://www.macmaps.com/badram.html
You'll learn it is more an art than a science to identify all quality memory chips. So while one can't guarantee there aren't additional chips that are not bad, it is more unlikely that chips that were definitely bad in the first plcae were recycled into your refurbished board.
So be prepared with some backup, in event something does fail*:
http://www.macmaps.com/backup.html
And yes, there are many machines that do last 8 years, even from
the more current machines. A lot depends on usage, and if you have power issues*:
http://www.macmaps.com/frayguide.html
and if you ensure the machine is on a surface where it is less likely to overheat.
If you get repeated failure of repairs, you should insist on getting a replacement Mac when next contacting AppleCare.
- * Links to my pages may give me compensation.

HCM Process and Forms - Clarification required reg BADI QISR1.

Hi all,
I want to have some extra validations done on some of the fields of my HCM Process Adobe form. For this, I created a new implementation for the BADI QISR1 with filter value as my Custom Scenario and implemented the method INT_SERVICE_REQUEST_CHECK. Validation is working now, but, it's not updating any data to the back end after I submit. When I checked, I found that SAP has written the whole logic to update the data to the Infotypes in another Implementation of the same BADI,which was like the Default implementation. But, that implementation is not getting triggerred now, as I have a new one now.
Do I have to copy the whole update logic to this Implementation now? Or is there any other setting for this?
Kindly help me.
Regards!
Mahesh

Not sure I follow you here, but here's some basics.
For any backend updates to infotypes, you should use the standard services SAP_PA, SAP_PT and SAP_PD (if on EhP4).
In some case, this won't work. So you have two choices:
(1) write and advanced generic service to handle this (difficult and no examples from SAP)
(2) write custom code triggered in workflow to do this (such as a custom function module) to handle your updates (past EhP2, you have to use the same classes as the decoupled framework uses....not the good ol' "infotype operations" standard FM).
Now, as for validations, you can handle those separately. In fact, talk about timely! (haha) I just posted a blog on this just now. =)
/people/christopher.solomon/blog/2009/06/22/hcm-processes-forms-required-fields-arent-what-they-use-to-be

BAdI: Determine Target Object in BE System IT_ITEM to CT_ITEM mapping

Hi everyone,
We are doing an upgrade to SRM 5.0 from EBP 3.5. For the BAdI stated in the topic, we need some information to adapt an old BAdI for the new version.
The post by Nicholas and answered by Christophe has been most helpful indeed. But I have one more query on some of the mappings.
For the same BAdI, in the IT_ITEM, we have:
AGREEMENT - KONNR CHAR 10 Number of principal purchase agreement
AGMT_ITEM - KTPNR NUMC 5 Item number of principal purchase agreement
In the new implementation, the signature has changed to CT_ITEM and there does not seem to be a direct corresponding field for these items. Can anyone please tell me what are the corresponding CT_ITEM fields that can be used in place of the original fields?
Is it any of these:
CTR_GUID
CTR_ITEM_NUMBER
CTR_HDR_NUMBER
CTR_HDR_GUID
Thank you!

Hi Ban,
I already pointed those new contract fields in the previous post.
So yes, screen those fields instead of old ones.
Contract GUID fields will be populated only for local contracts (SRM contract GUID). Contract ID field is populated for SRM and R/3 contracts as well.
Rgds
Christophe
PS: please reward points for helpfull answers

BADI for restrict creation of business transaction independently

Hello Experts,
I have a requirement where I need to check if the Business activity (say any 'Z' transaction) has a opportunity follow-up document then only that business transaction need to be executed else should give the error that "Z transaction need to be created through opportunity only and can not be created individually".
I found one BADI CRM_ORDERADM_H_BADI where I can check for the condition but the issue is that as soon as I entered to CRMD_ORDER this BADI gets triggered where I need to trigger this BADI only when the user is trying to create the 'Z' business transaction individually.
Any Suggestion will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance & Best Regards,
Deepak Gupta

Deepak, there is a parameter called CRM_MODE and this has the following values depending upon the transaction context:
A - Create
B - Change
C - Display and
D - Delete
Now, in the same BAdI, since you are restricting the creation of the activity, check the CRM_MODE for the Activity, if it is A, then, call the function module CRM_ORDER_READ with the GUID of the activity and extract only the document flow ET_DOC_FLOW. Check this export table and see if the parent is an opportunity (BUS2000111). If your condition is not met, add an Error message in the transaction.

SCXI-1321 Bad Chips and Function Calls

8-4-04
This message is intended for the PSE of the SCXI-1321 and that person�s manager. Please route it accordingly. I would appreciate a phone response to 8**-2**-2*** so that I might share some specific experiences.
To the managers of the SCXI product line,
I have used the SCXI-1121 with the SCXI 1321 for some time now, approximately 6 years. Our company generally uses them for full bridge pressure transducers and similar applications. I have some suggestions that would make them more saleable. I also believe that you will never know how many customers you have already lost on this product line, for the reasons given below.
1. For many years the shunt resistor on the 1321 has been vastly unusable. What SHOULD be possible is to command the shunt resistor through a Labview command, and then read the virtual channel to see the shunted value. That IS the purpose of the feature. What happens is that once you set the shunt command, then read the virtual channel, the very act of reading the channel UN-shunts the resistor. What you read is some value part way between, because the chip relay from Clare actually ramps open and closed, unlike a mechanical relay. If your timing loop to read the value is consistent, you will consistently read a BAD value. Several VI�s tried to command the shunt, then quickly read the virtual channel, then loop and do it again, and thought they had solved the problem. Further investigation showed that all that was really happening is that the readings appeared to be stable because of the fast loop time, but were actually mid-release of the shunt for all readings.
2. NI eventually starting saying �don�t use virtual channels with the shunt�. In fact, there is a channel string that starts with the word �shunt� that was recommended. The only problem with this is that the data that comes back is not scaled! Keep in mind that NI has been pushing �virtual channels� on users for many years as the way to do business, and so entire test stands are developed around them and MAX. Because we depend on MAX to do the scaling, how are we supposed to be able to read the data scaled? Does NI expect customers to duplicate the efforts of MAX for every virtual channel and scale it separately? Do I have to keep duplicate tracking of scaling information so that my virtual channels will work in the main code, but again elsewhere so that my calibration routine can read the data? This is messy, and for most customers, untenable.
3. I was told, literally, year after year and release after release, that the problem would be fixed in future versions of NI-DAQ. Each release proved that the problem was not resolved. I am sure that many customers were not repeat customers as they found the problems associated with using a simple shunt on the board. I myself needed this hardware due to the 1121/1321 parallel operation capability.
4. After years of trying to fight with the issues above, and what seemed like random problems with the shunting of channels, a second hardware related issue has finally been identified. See SRQ#600753 with Michelle Yagle. The Clare solid state relays installed on the 14 different 1321�s I bought ALL had the same defect. Imagine what this means for troubleshooting! You swap boards to try to troubleshoot, but they are all defective and so you falsely rule out the board, the problem didn�t resolve with a different board. The lot# 0027T12627 of chips covers a wide range of 1321 serial numbers (see my SRQ for details). That means this impacts a lot of potential customers. The part is rated by the manufacturer to 80C, 176F. This particular lot stops functioning as low as 96F! A great deal of testing with heat guns, shop air, and a thermocouple showed that all the chips in this lot fail somewhere between 96 and 110F, well below manufacturers specs or NI�s specs on the board. I also tested lot 98, from a board two years older, as well as new chips from lot 03, which both worked perfectly all the way up to 212F (100C).
Conclusions:
I believe that the people that have tried to use your 1321 have generally had a miserable time of it, unless they already do their own scaling (like some of the Alliance members do.) This is because the shunt feature is not compatible with virtual channels, because NI did not offer a reasonable fix for this problem over a four+ year period, and does NOT advertise this limitation when people are making hardware selections. Further, I believe there are many people that have boards with the same bad lot of chips on them that don�t know it. They may have elected to hardwire their own resistors after fighting with random problems (temperature related). They might have elected to hardwire their own resistors to get around the NI-DAQ limitation. They might not even use the shunt resistor. But one thing is certain: NI needs to clean up this board�s operation, make sure that customers of the serial numbers in my SRQ named above are notified of the bad chips, and fully test that the use of the relays is transparent to LV virtual channels in the future. People will not trust NI products with this type of problems, and will not buy the product again if all the features don�t work!
I have helped NI resolve similar issues with the SCXI-1126 years ago, which had a number of scaling issues in NI-DAQ (the board read great when you used 1k, 2k, 4k, 8k, etc. even ranges, but if you set a virtual channel to 0-2200, the readings were off.) I plotted the problem, documented it with my sales rep, and worked at length with tech support. The boards also had a lot of bad buffer amplifier chips that allowed cross talk between channels, causing a lot of other spurious problems. Those experiences were horribly frustrating, but I now buy the product with confidence. It took a lot of push on my part to convince NI there was a real underlying problem. This 1321 board is similar.
I want NI products to be the best they can be, as I have dedicated my career around them. Please take this feedback to heart, and contact me at 8**-2**-2*** to talk about these issues. Additionally, I am speaking at NI week this year and will be available for discussion. Contact me at the same number.
Sincerely,
Tim Jones
Test Equipment Design Engineer
Space Shuttle Program
Space, Land and Sea Enterprise, Hamilton Sundstrand

Tim
Thank you for your feedback for the SCXI-1321 terminal block.
I wanted to see if it would be possible for you to move your application to NI DAQmx, the new driver for DAQ and SCXI as of NI-DAQ 7.0. I have tested the shunt calibration using a SCXI-1121 and SCXI-1321 and it works as it should. There are two ways to do the shunt calibration with DAQmx.
The first is to use the Calibration feature in the DAQ Assistant. When creating a DAQmx Task in either MAX or LabVIEW, you can select the �Device� tab and click on the Calibration button. It will then ask you if you either want to do a null or shunt calibration, or both. It will then do the calibrations selected and save the values to the task.
The other option to measure the shunted value is to use the AI.B
ridge.ShuntCal.Enable property node in LabVIEW. By setting this property to True, the driver will enable the shunt for the current measurements. If you are taking a strain measurement, the value will be converted to strain.
We are currently looking into the issues you are seeing with the Clare relays to see if other users could be affected.
Brian Lewis
Signal Conditioning PSE
National Instruments

Bad hyperlinks when saving Pages doc as PDF

I produce a little monthly newsletter for a local Mac club. We do the layout in pages. I write the article another member lays them out in Pages. A couple others proof.
We've been having a problem that is driving me crazy in Pages 09. We use Print, then save as PDF, so we can get a format that everyone can read. Almost always when we do this, links that worked fine in the Pages document convert to an address that no longer works (usually something on the creator's computer that he has placed in the document). I'm saying almost all links (but not quite all) in the entire document end up with this same bad address in the final Adobe PDF version.
The only way we have found to fix this is by abandoning the entire hyperlinks system and typing out http://www.blah.blah in our text, which feels extremely early Internet and not the type of polished production we're aiming for.
Does anyone know what might be causing this problem or how to fix it? I've gone in one of our documents, completely removed the link, and then replaced it. It still has the same address to something on my colleague's computer. It's just crazy. This is a nasty, nasty bug.
Thanks in advance for any clues.

I assume that this post is related to Gene Madill's a couple of hours ago. Is that so? I'm thinking that someone in the chain of custody has a machine that has an OS corruption. Possibly a system not properly updated to the latest version of Snow Leopard.
There have been a couple of bugs in incremental Snow Leopard updates. One at 10.6.2 and another at 10.6.7.
Are you up to speed on these issues? Are all of you up to date and clean?
Jerry

BADI 'ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST to populate TEXT at the time of PO creation

Hello All,
I am using the above BADI to attempt to populate calculated text from class characteristics into a purchase order. Does anyone know if this can be done.I have checked the parameters that are available for this BADI (MEPOHEADER and MEPOITEM) and I do not see fields for TEXT.
The business requirement is that certain text is calculated from the vendor characteristics and this must be populated into the PO during its creation. Since the PO has not been committed to the database the function modules for this 'SAVE_TEXT' cannot be used.
Please advise.

hi,
Vivek is right u have to use same badi , it helps u out,
below i gives u code plz ref that, in which u have to call
CALL METHOD im_header->if_longtexts_mm~set_text
as given below through this code u can maintain long text for each id in header of po.
METHOD if_ex_me_process_po_cust~process_header.
DATA: l_repid TYPE sy-repid,
        l_dynumb TYPE d020s-dnum,
        l_fldnam TYPE dynpread-fieldname.
DATA: l_value2(80).
DATA : re_data1 TYPE mepoheader.
l_repid = 'SAPLMEGUI'.
l_dynumb = '1105'.
l_fldnam = 'MEPO_TOPLINE-BSART'.
CALL FUNCTION 'GET_DYNP_VALUE'
    EXPORTING
      i_field             = l_fldnam
      i_repid             = l_repid
      i_dynnr             = l_dynumb
I_CONV_INPUT        = ' '
I_CONV_OUTPUT       = ' '
    CHANGING
      o_value             = l_value2.
CODE IS ADDED BY SANTOSH KUBAL**** DT :8.01.2009
REQ : SANTOSH JAGTAP***
***PURPOSE: FOR PUR.ORGANISTION 2700 & 2701 WHEN NEW PO IS CREATED
DEFULT HEADER TEXT WILL BE CALL IN HEADER NOTE ID- F02 ***
***DEFULT HEADER TEXT is mentain in SO10 TEXT ID ST .
IF sy-tcode = 'ME21N'.
DATA: l_purorg(8).
DATA: im_tdid   TYPE tdid. "Importing
DATA: im_textlines TYPE mmpur_t_textlines .
DATA: wa_textlines LIKE LINE OF   im_textlines.
DATA: text_tab TYPE TABLE OF tline,
            wa_text_tab TYPE tline.
l_repid = 'SAPLMEGUI'.
l_dynumb = '1221'.
l_fldnam = 'MEPO1222-EKORG'.
CALL FUNCTION 'GET_DYNP_VALUE'
    EXPORTING
      i_field             = l_fldnam
      i_repid             = l_repid
      i_dynnr             = l_dynumb
    CHANGING
      o_value             = l_purorg.
IF l_purorg = '2700' OR l_purorg = '2701'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'READ_TEXT'
        EXPORTING
         client                        = sy-mandt
         id                            = 'ST'
         language                      = sy-langu
         name                          = 'DEFULT_HEADR_TEXT'
         object                        = 'TEXT'
        TABLES
         lines                         = text_tab
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
       * MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
       *         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
      ENDIF.
          IF text_tab IS NOT INITIAL.
            LOOP AT text_tab INTO wa_text_tab .
            wa_textlines-tdline = wa_text_tab-tdline.
            APPEND wa_textlines TO im_textlines.
            ENDLOOP .
         ENDIF.
      wa_textlines-tdobject     = 'TEXT' .
      wa_textlines-tdid =     'ST'.
      wa_textlines-tdformat = 'SP'.
      APPEND wa_textlines TO im_textlines.
      CALL METHOD im_header->if_longtexts_mm~set_text
        EXPORTING
          im_tdid         = 'F02'
          im_textlines    = im_textlines.
          ENDIF.
     ENDIF.
***end of code**
ENDMETHOD.

USB Flash Drive no longer shows on Desktop, it does appear in disk utility. I recently upgraded to 10.8 from 10.6 on both iMac and Macbook and the drive does the same on both.

I updated my Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion and have had only minor issues with some software but I plugged in a USB flash drive and went to format it, it now appears only in disk utility and not on the desktop. I have tried restarting and reseting with the drive in and out, I tried it into my macbook and it does exactly the same there. I can't do anything in Disk Utility so can't access it in any way and it says errors if I try to eject it from DU. I'm not normally stumped but I can't figure this out at all. I'm hoping that someone here could give me an idea that I haven't thought of as it's a large Flash Drive and I really would like to keep using it.
Thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer.

If it has the same (bad) behavior on two different systems then there is a very good chance that the drive is toast.
BTW you'll get better response to your questions if the question actually reflects the problem you are having. In this case it would have been better to say you couldn't access the drive rather then that it doesn't show on the desktop.
regards

Badi for PO ME22n

hi,
I am using the BAdi ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST for PO enhancement.I a want to change the Netprice field into display if the the Gr is being done for that line item while checking in the MKpf Table.But when i use the breakpoint at the FIELDSELECTION_ITEM its nor stopping there.but its stopping on diffent methods of same badi isf break point is used there. badi is active as well.
Please any body suggest me i will be thankfull ,
regards,
Ronie
Message was edited by: Ronie James

no
Message was edited by: Ronie James

BADI for Purchase Order

Hi,Friends
I Want to Implement BADI , Which is already available in SAP.
The Path for BADI is given below.
SPRO->SAP Reference IMG->Materials Management->Purchasing->Business Add-Ins for Purchasing
Name of BADI
1 Control of Pricing Type: Additional Fields : ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE
2.Run Through Items Again in the Event of Changes in EKKO : ME_CHECK_ALL_ITEMS
This enhancement is about Transaction Code ME23N for creating Purchase Order.
I am not getting what exactly this BADI does?
while creating purchase order and Price determination process ,When i define Incoterms at Header level i want to change condition type for Item Level according to our requirement.
my problem is that , i don't have parameters to pass condition types.
can anybody tell me the solution?

Hi archana,
actually i want to use the same BAdi and method (PROCESS_ITEM).
Question: did you use parameter GET_HEADER of method PROCESS_ITEM ?
my problem: i want to read BSART from MEPOHEADER-data and according to result i want check MEPOITEM-data (here: WEPOS)
ls_mepoitem = im_item->get_data( )
works, but i did not find out how to use
...->get_header( )
If you used it, can you paste© your source code ???
Thanx a lot !
Jörg
P.S. it's my first BAdI
-- no more help needed ! Problem solved by adding own post!!! ---
Message was edited by: Jörg Sauterleute

Hi christophe Same Badi

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for