Hi, i am looking for a decision. shall i buy a 21,5 2,7 ghz or 2,8 ghz imac?

hi, i am looking for a decision. shall i buy a 21,5 2,7 ghz or 2,8 ghz imac?

First, if you decide you want a 21.5" iMac, go with the 2.7 GHz. The specs are better and I think a better value. Upgrade to the largest internal Hard Drive.
There is no comparing anything to the 27" 3.1GHz iMac. It's the top of the line.
Highly recommend you get to a local Apple Retail Store if possible to look at both. The 27" take up a lot of space. But also gives you plenty of room to work with multiple windows open. It all comes down to what you need it for and what you can afford.

Similar Messages

HT204347 Thanks, the write-up was informative, But it do not answer for my question, that is where to look for serial # on my Macbook Pro Mid 2010 White Unibody Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz 13.3"? Its not on bottom-case and the above article does not mention this m

Thanks, the write-up was informative, But it do not answer for my question, that is where to look for serial # on my Macbook Pro Mid 2010 White Unibody Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz 13.3"? Its not on bottom-case and the above article does not mention this model?

Click on the Apple and then on about this Mac. In the new window, click on the "version 10.9.2" until you see the serial number displayed.

What to look for in external HD

I'm about to buy a new external hard drive. I've always looked for an apple logo when buying this sort of stuff, but seriously, it's a stupid hard drive. I need a USB 2 port and power. If it is formatted different than I want then I can change it. Time Machine will make a separate disc image anyways, so does a logo matter? Should I just look for something on super-duper-extra-laser sale? Yes, budget-brand drive and my MBP COULD crash at the same time? Am I forgetting anything?
Unrelated, but I just saw the CEO of Seagate talk about backing up from "an internet or an iTunes". Internet gold found at:
http://online.wsj.com/video/seagate-latest-consumer-launch/96D2BB41-DDE1-4D89-A2 84-23CEEB1520EE.html

I would pick an HD that you feel comfortable with. FYI, Apple outsources its HDD, so an Apple logo doesn't really mean much if you are looking for an HDD. Apple puts Maxtor and Western Digital HDDs in its iMacs and Hitachis in its 500GB Time Capsule. I don't know if there are any other makes Apple uses, but I hope you get my point. Just make sure that once you pick one out, check the partition scheme and formatting and re-partition and re-format. Many are formatted for PCs out of the box. If you need wireless Time Machine backups and in the market for an AirPort Extreme Base Station, check out the Time Capsule.

Looking for test demo of new 21/27 iMac in-house in Carmel, IN

Hi all.
I am looking for someone that might be willing to let my parents see and use their 21"/27" iMac at there house for a little while. They absolutely DETEST the new glossy screens, at least how they look when they are the store. But their house isn't a white box with dozen of light sources producing massive amounts of glare. So short of buying one and returning it, and all the hassle thereof, I thought there might be a kind soul out their willing to help.
They desperately need a new computer (iMac G5 with possibily failing drive), and an iMac would be a perfect choice if it wasn't for the glossy screen. If they can't live with that, then it'll have to be a Mini + third-party monitor.
They live in Carmel, IN. Please email me back if your willing so we could arrange a meet.
-doug

I see what you're saying. You want the computer at your house to see how it works in the environment. That's a pretty tall order. But you might do as Dave suggests and go to Keystone At The Crossing and talk with the people there. They may be able to hook you up with a loaner or something.
My iMac sits facing west and there's window that's approx. 6'x12' behind me and 99% (okay I made that percentage up) I don't see any glare whatsoever. 100% it's not a bother (that one I didn't make up). I would assume as you did that the Apple Store is about as bad as it could get for a glossy screen. Bright, lots of white.

Looking for a mixer

I am looking for a quality but cheap mixer to hook up my digital piano via MIDI to my iMac. It would also be nice if the mixer had some mic inputs in it. I would appreciate any suggestions.

You're confusing terms here.
You seem to be looking for two different things. A Mixer (for Mics), and a MIDI interface (for your keyboard).
1. 5 input, single Mic Mixer
2. MIDI Interface

Looking for a usable GUI Designer/Container...

Hi all.
Since a while, I'm looking for an integrated environment to develop and execute Java/Swing GUI and it seems it's not possible to find such a thing...
I explain : we are developping lots of J2EE applications hosted in a well known Application Server, and for what concern server, we can find 'on the shelf' almost all we need. Thus, using Session Beans, EJB3, Spring (...), it's pretty comfortable to build professional applications.
But generally speeking, these applications have a graphical part, and at this point, things become more complicated. For years, we have been using only Java, for both server and client part (Swing, even in its firsts versions... souvenirs...). But even after 10 years of Java, it seems that it is still not possible to find a tool in which we can design, test, deploy and execute our GUIs.
Since Matisse appeared, it is a little bit easier to design panels (but not so trivial... JFormDesigner has released a beta version supporting the GroupLayout : still lots of bugs) but for what concern, let's say, the 'GUI Container' part, it seems that market/open source has no answer. I tried Netbeans RCP (and also Eclipse...), but these containers have been thought for IDE, and concepts are not easy to map on a standard GUI. Moreover, these containers are huge and not so easy to understand, so very often, the decision to build full custom applications is taken, re-writing for the 1000th time the main window, the menubar/toolbar management, the MDI controller (using sometime a docking framework), ... Thus, the cost of the development and the baseline is high, and of course, our clients are dissatisfied.
Recently, a new way of developping applications appeared : server part is developped using Java/J2EE, and the client side (fat client) is made using .Net. Interop between client and server leans on WebServices or binary interop (JIntegra).
I'm totally convinced that this kind of architecture is a mistake, but it's more and more difficult to defend Java on the client side. C# tools seem to be easier to use, more productive, ...
So my question is : what are your opinions/experiences on this subject? Have you found "the magic tool", "the magic framework", ... that make of Java/Swing a good challenger for desktop developments... or do you think that the game is over, and that Microsoft .Net has definitively won the client?
Thks for your answers!!
Rd

I believe it is not about winning and lossing. Its about learning. By the way, let me mention that God who is the mastermind of all variations is a God of diversity. Every diverse expression of whatever kind is a reflection and coextension of its maker -and that means that even you are a coextension of Himself.
Perhaps, if you are really looking for a tool that would satisfy your demands or desires along with Java, isnt it not logical to say that... or shall I say "perhaps" God is leading you into that new expression of diversity -a diversity that will challenge the whole creation? I dont blame others with what I cant do for myself.
One saying says,
"Seek and you shall find; Knock and the door will be opened to you; Ask and it shall be given you." The shorter way of saying it is..."Be patient and you will be satisfied."
If the clients lost patience. Make them understand how complex it is to make a java application. They will appreciate your wisdom.
Well nothing is impossible. The best part of your mind [one variation of the others] will always suggest: "All things are possilbe".
Therefore, do not despise what God is blessing.
Oliver Bob Lagumen
Newbie in Java

How to look for duplicate process instances?

In Oracle BPM 11g, is there a good way to look for duplicate process instances based on process data attributes? For example, I have entered an instance of a process for 'John Smith' with a date of '4/1/2010' and I want to see if there is another instance in the same process with these same data values to evaluate as a potential duplicate. I believe we can write a java service to invoke the API to do this, but I am wondering if there is a better way within the process design to do this (XPath extension functions or soemthing?). It seems like this would be a common need.

I am really looking for an approach to looking for duplicate instances within my process flow, not from EM. So, if the user starts a new instance of a process, I can check for another instance that appears to be a duplicate and direct the flow to a human activity to review the potential duplicate and make a decision as to whether to continue processing the new instance or reject it. My guess is that we need to us a service task to invoke java code which uses the API to investigate other instances with the same values. But, I was hoping for a simpler solution....I have to think that this is not too uncommon.

Upgrading to uber SDO_GEOMETRY, looking for comments

Good morning folks,
I see the new thread from Dalibor discussing an issue with what I am calling "uber" SDO_GEOMETRY - anyone got a better name?
Uber SDO_GEOMETRY is described here
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/appdev.112/e11830/sdo_migrat.htm#CHDBCHBG
Dalibor wins some kind of prize for the first time anyone has brought up uber SDO on the forum since the old thread ran its course years back
Re: SDO_GEOMETRY size limits here to stay?
Coincidentally this past week was my first shot at trying out the upgrade script and I thought I might post my experiences and see if anyone would have comments. This was just a test machine and I agree that each major error could have been followed up with a SR. But my overall goal is to determine if installing and running uber SDO_GEOMETRY is feasible in my production environment, so for better or worse these experiences are building those recommendations.
So I am not much interested in going much in length why anyone would want to upgrade. I think the old thread covers it. For my work at least, the issues have not gone away. No question a polygon with millions of vertices is nutty, but they are out there all over the place and growing in number each year. Here are two additional datasets I am working with that are "over the top" for normal SDO:
* National Wetlands Inventory (http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/DataDownload.html) - Largest polygon has 1,210,907 vertices.
* FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (http://www.msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/info?storeId=10001&catalogId=10001&langId=-1&content=nfhlResources&title=NFHL%20Resources) - Largest polygon has 1,537,698 vertices.
My current procedure is to load the datasets using ESRI's geometry format, identify the biggies, export the remainder and then reimport them as SDO_GEOMETRY.
E.g. toss the big polygons away and explain to my clients that Oracle Spatial cannot handle this type of thing.
My production instances remain on 10g so uber SDO is not yet a possibility but I am trying to think ahead.
So back to the present. I started with a fresh 11gR2 (no upgrade history) running PSU 11.2.0.1.2 on OpenSUSE on a rather modest machine with two processors and four gig of RAM. I have about 100 gig of Oracle Spatial data on this machine. Basically I ended up running the upgrade script four times of the course of about 5 days, each run required about 30 hours to process. Here are some notes:
* Make sure you spool the results! The script is quite "verbose" and does not have any error checking so the ALTER TYPE CASCADE part can fail but the script continues recompiling packages and rebuilding all your indexes. This is good in that the system is put back together whether it bombs or not. Bad in that you can waste a lot of time waiting to rerun the script.
* You need lots of undo! The first time it ran through it appeared to finish and it was not until I looked at the logs did I see that I ran out of undo. I just had a single smallfile undo and it topped out at 32 gig. In the end I created 4 undo datafiles and it appears I needed 100 gig of undo! So I believe you need as much undo as you have SDO_GEOMETRY data. The first thing you want to do afterwards is DESCRIBE MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY to see if the type was altered. If you see the usual 1048576 then you bombed.
* Second time through I received an error that I had some spatial indexes in a failed state. Turns out as this is a development box there was an index stuck in "INPROGRS" state due to some flub on my part. This was enough to hose the upgrade. I would suggest folks check for this ahead of time using SELECT * FROM dba_indexes WHERE index_type = 'DOMAIN' AND domidx_status != 'VALID' and drop or rebuild those indexes.
* Third time through I received the cryptic error
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-22324: altered type has compilation errors
ORA-22332: a dependent object in schema "NAVTEQ_SF" has errors.
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [qctostiix1], [], [], [], [], [],
[], [], [], [], [], []I had some sample Navteq data for use with the networking demo I never got functioning. At this point after four days of trying I was getting a bit impatient and just decided to drop that schema and try again. I have no idea why this navteg data caused an issue but the error never happened again with any other datasets.
* Fourth time through the alter type worked! But the script still crashed with
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [qximgcn1], [], [], [], [], [], [],
ORA-06512: at line 14After eyeballing the script and the spool file it looks like it failed in the final step where it rebuilds all the spatial indexes. This seems right as I found sixty seven bad spatial indexes afterwards. However, it was easy enough to rebuild those by hand myself (I mean have ArcSDE do so).
So I call this a success! :)
So I am looking for anyone else's experiences they'd like to share.
With the amount of undo required, I think it might be a better route to just use the old school exp to export out all spatial data, run the upgrade and then imp it all back in? Or perhaps just dump out the large tables? Weird 00600 errors cause the DBAs (not part of my organization) that manage my production environment to bleed internally. Ideally I would like to avoid all that pain and suffering. Perhaps just dropping ALL the spatial indexes before the upgrade? I guess I would need to open an SR to see what caused the 00600s. I suspect the indexes.
So I would like to keep this thread tied to the upgrade process and/or planning/strategy for the upgrade process. There are a lot of other issues that we should start new threads over. For example, exchange of data between standard and uber instances as Dalibor is doing. It sure appears that datapump is never going to work and that only the old-school unsupported imp/exp utility can play this role? I have done some initial testing and ESRI's sdeimport/sdeexport tools seems to work fine between these instances. And none of this even scratches the performance issues.
So hey Dalibor, I know you went through this. Any comments?
Cheers!
Paul

Hi Mike,
Nice to hear from you. I would indeed be interested in your thoughts on the upgrade and the actual business case surrounding the upgrade or the decision not to upgrade. I am feeling rather skeptical at this point as the side-effects of the medicine so far are pretty serious. But yet the need to treat the disease remains. You can always drop me an email offline at my first name at my last name dot com or via LinkedIn. The nice things about a super-rare unpronounceable Polish last name is I am easy to find - and that's the bad thing too. Here is an update on my testing.
Per my earlier SR, the folks are Oracle have provided a backport for bug 10085580 for Linux 32-bit. It looks to work just fine and does the trick - problem solved. If one needs something other than Linux you will need to request the backport for your platform. The bug affects more than SDO_GEORASTER so I would recommend this patch as mandatory.
Moving along my next issue is that Oracle MapViewer does not seem to work with uber SDO_GEOMETRY.
MapViewer and uber (Very Large) SDO_GEOMETRY upgrade not compatible?
This is again a bit of a nonstarter as my client has a couple of applications using MapViewer against production instances. I dutifully submitted an SR on the matter yesterday. Almost to be expected the tech immediately asked why I would want to have such a large geometry and why don't I thin it! :)
It's no fun being in the middle on these things. I suppose I could ring up FEMA or Fish and Wildlife and tell them Oracle Corporation thinks their polygons are crazy. But as they are ESRI-shop folks, I think they would just be puzzled by the statement. If anyone has an opinion on how to broach the topic nicely with public agencies, I would love to hear it. Do we need to create a "citizens against huge polygons" lobby in DC? Again the ESRI shop folks are smirking.
The other issue in the thread started by Dalibor where the old imp/exp is erratically failing on the table creation statements is probably going to need an SR too. The work around is to just append the data and create your tables by hand ahead of time. On a more positive note ArcSDE seems utterly oblivious to the type change and I have not found any problems using ESRI tools to move stuff around.
Cheers,
Paul

Powerbook Titanium user looking for advice on MacBook Pro

Hello, all,
After almost 10 years of faithful service, I'm afraid that my 15" TiBook is showing signs of age and may soon need replacing. For financial reasons, I can't spring for a brand-new, top-of-the-line MBP, and I was wondering if you had any advice about what I should look for in a reconditioned model from the AppleStore. Aside from basic functions like emails and web, I'd be using it primarily for the Adobe Creative Suite (no animation or any really heavy stuff) and for watching DVDs when away from home. How do you feel about the glossy screens, for example? On the French AppleStore, there are a couple of MBPs from early 2011, but I'd seen that there were concerns with the temperature/fan noises… I realize that almost anything I may buy now will be light years faster and more powerful than the 667 Mhz that I have now, but I'd like for the replacement machine to be as impervious to ageing as the PB has been.
Any and all advice would be most welcome.
Thanks for reading.

My suggestion since you prefer to maximize your computers lifespan is to get either the new:
1: High res, anti-glare 15" 2.2 Ghz or above
2: High res, anti-glare 17" 2.2 Ghz or above.
(The 13" MacBook Pro is integrated graphics, the 15" 2.0 has a dedicated graphics card that is as weak as the integrated graphics. Both are very poor choices for the long term.)
The two models I've mentioned have the top of the line i7 Quad cores that simply blow the dual cores away in every way possible. The 1GB Radeon 6750M GPU is a monster video card that will satisfy ANY need you have for a long time.
If your trying to save money and going for a used dual core i5, your doing yourself a great disservice because those machines are soon destined for the scrap heap.
I opted for the anti-glare because with a laptop it's a necessity unless you live in a basement or a cave.
The glossy forces you to seek dark locations to see the screen because it reflects dam near everything, even your face.
Some people say to get a aftermarket anti-glare film, but those are expensive, they dry out, peal and bubble, not very nice looking and need occassional replacement.
You will not give a flying ratts *ss four days later if you don't have a snazzy black bezel, your going to want to use the machine as intended in nearly any location. The matching case bezel is just wonderful and the new anti-glare (not ugly matte like before) screen is of a higher quality, looks fantastic being able to see every inch of the screen all the time.
You can do a Google image search for "Mac glossy anti-glare" and get hundreds of pictures for your decision making process.
The new machines are easily opened up to add more RAM or switch out the hard drive with a 00 micro-phillips screwdriver and a plastic compartmentalized holder to place the screws in order so the right ones go into the right holes. Won't void your warranty as long as you don't do any damage. Don't strip the screws.
Do get AppleCare and a good case, even a MacTruck.
Use the keyboard and trackpad as little as possible, use a wired or wireless instead to keep the wear off the machine.
Keep the keyboard area covered and away from food/liquids, it gets behind the keys easily and will fry it.
If you use the keyboard and trackpad, take off any jewelry and use a pad protector as you'll wear the case and 3 years from now it will look ugly as sin.
Snow Leopard is a great OS, Apple plans on major changes in the next one to make OS X look like a iPad, you might not like it. The grumbling has already started.
So get a Snow Leopard machine now with the iLife on the installer disks while you have a chance, a few weeks from now you might not have that option as all new machines will be forced into Lion.

Studio Monitors - what to look for...

I'm going to say this right now - I'm NOT asking "hey, whats the best studio monitors I can get for x dollars." That's not what I'm interested in.
What I AM interested in is what TO look for, and what NOT to look for in buying a new set of stereo monitors.
I've decided I'd like to upgrade my studio monitors. I'm mixing on a pair of Event TR8 XL monitors - they're great, but i know there's better out there. I spent about $600 on the pair.
At this point, my limited knowledge of monitors only allow me to assume that more expensive means better, but I don't understand WHY, or what to look for. So, my question is this. What is more money buying me? Are there brands that are more or less reputable than others?
I'm really looking for general, or specific, advice on shopping for new monitors. Help me make an educated decision, there are too **** many monitors out there to choose from.
For what it's worth, I'd like to keep it under 1k. I'm interested in active near-fields, good for mixing, with decent clarity and few gimiks. Granted, nothing beats getting into a GC and listening to a few (which I intend to do in the next day or two), but I need a little more to go on when I take a look at these in person and listen to some of my mixes on them.
Thanks!
Chris

To add to the previous poster, I have a pair of old NS10's and I use them because I'm used to how they sound and how their sound translates to several other of my references, i.e. my SET/Bottlehead listening system, my car CD player, my table radio. One reason a studio owner would buy say Genelecs or Mackie HR 824's is because they have become somewhat of a standard and like the NS10's of 15 years ago, people know what they're getting once you're used the way mixes translate from them to other systems. That being said, get the Mackies, or Dynaudio BM5A's. Both those seem to be widely accepted and studio proven. That's a good place to start.

Buying Used iMac - What to look for?

Hello,
I'm a devoted mac user. I currently own a late 2008 unibody Macbook, and have been looking for an upgrade. I came across a used iMac posting on a craigslist-like website. The configuration is a low-end mid-2011 21" iMac (quad core i5, 4gb, 500gb).
I asked the seller for the serial number and checked it out the support site. The warranty is due to run out on Thursday, just enough time for me to buy extended AppleCare. The price seems reasonable (approx $730 whereas a new iMac is $1200), and I've asked to see the iMac in person tomorrow. I wanted to know what to look for when making the final decision.
Also do you think I should hold out for an Ivy Bridge iMac (rumoured to be coming soon??) or will it not make a difference for normal coding/browsing (no photo/video editing/gaming)? One factor discouraging me is that Apple has hitched up the prices for the newly released Macbooks here in India (the base 13" pro used to be $1250, now $1530!!!).
Thanks a lot!
Meghana

RRFS wrote:
Then you have to make sure the original owner releases their account at Apple or purchases and upgrades will be impossible.
Oh! Had no idea about this... how does one release the account? I mean, is there a way i can check it on the machine itself? The applecare site doesn't show any registration info.
Thanks!!

Looking for best practice on application scope beans

Hey â€“ a portal newbie here. Iâ€™ve got some application scope beans that need to be initialized on startup. First thought was to create a servlet that would set the bean. Then I saw the GlobalApp setting, but I think that looks like it is more session scope than applicationâ€¦ Looking to be corrected here if I am wrong.
Is there a place where these type of things traditionally happen? Read only, so no cluster worries (I think) Using WLP 8.1 SP4 and looking for best practices. Thanks for the help!

To support "code sharing" you need an integrated source code control system. Several options are out there but CVS (https://www.cvshome.org/) is a nice choice, and it's completely free and it runs on Windows, Linux, and most UNIX variants.
Your next decision is on IDE and application server. These are usually from a single "source". For instance, you can choose Oracle's JDeveloper and Deploy to Oracle Application Server; or go with free NetBeans IDE and Jakarta Tomcat; or IBM's WebSphere and their application server. Selection of IDE and AppServer will likely result in heated debates.

Looking for best practice on J2EE development environment

Hi,
We are starting to develope with J2EE. We are looking for best practice on J2EE development environment. Our concern is mainly on code sharing and deployment.
Thanks, Charles

To support "code sharing" you need an integrated source code control system. Several options are out there but CVS (https://www.cvshome.org/) is a nice choice, and it's completely free and it runs on Windows, Linux, and most UNIX variants.
Your next decision is on IDE and application server. These are usually from a single "source". For instance, you can choose Oracle's JDeveloper and Deploy to Oracle Application Server; or go with free NetBeans IDE and Jakarta Tomcat; or IBM's WebSphere and their application server. Selection of IDE and AppServer will likely result in heated debates.

Looking for a web font - advice please

Hi, I know this isn't a DW question, but I'm hoping somebody might be able to guide me.
I'm looking for a font (preferably on google fonts) that resembles Edwardian Script. If anybody knows off the top of their head a font that is similar, could you advise me please?
Thanks.
Mat

Nancy O. wrote:
Most hobbyists and bloggers sites could probably fly under the radar with unlicensed fonts. But commercial web sites could be in for a whole heap of litigation woes. It's not worth the risk for something so trivial.
Please cite a case where a commercial website was sued for violating the fonts license? In UK Harrods tried to sue a coffee shop for using Harrods fonts and they lost with heavy legal costs. Fonts can never be patented and people are free to use whenever they can.
Some bully boys will try anything but people have to stand for their rights. I am currently in dispute with easy Jet because I have registered one website with name like easy XXXXX. Now they tried to bully me for using the word easy and I challenged them to sue me. Their solicitors wrote to me and intimidating me and I won the first round. They are appealing and so the case continues. The court has decided that I should not promote the website until the appeal is heard but in the meantime, I have notified easy jet the revenue I am losing because of this restrictions. The court is aware of this and if I win the case, I shall be entitled to millions of pounds in compensation due to lost revenues.

Looking for a VirtualCD-(vc4/000-)image converter

Hey!
I'm looking for a tool to open and convert VirtualCD-image files. I know that I could start Win, install VirtualCD, mount the vc4/000-file and make an iso9660-file out of it, but it would be a lot easier if there was a converting tool. Mounting vc4 files as they where iso-files doesn't work, btw.
Does anyone know a tool supporting vc4?
Thanks in advance!
Cheers Sigi

Resolution has nothing to do with how your site looks - it
only determines
the maximum practical width for a browser viewport on that
particular
screen. Your site would look EXACTLY the same in a
fixed-width browser
viewport on ANY resolution screen. So, chasing resolution is
like nailing
jelly to the wall. It's a waste of time.
When you create your page, you have to make a number of
decisions on layout
approach:
1. Fixed width, left aligned
2. Fixed width, center aligned
3. Flexible width - full screen
4. Flexible width - min/max, centered
5. Elastic (i.e., expands height/width with font size change)
Once you have made that going in decision, you cannot easily
change to some
other layout type without significantly rebuilding the page.
So -
> I wonder if there is a quick way or small
> program or using css that I can quickly change the
resolution
the answer would be "NO".
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"bullhorn" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:ff7cno$6dg$[email protected]..
> Hi all,
> I need to make my website viewable in both 800x600 and
1024x768. Under
> advice,
> I designed it mainly for 800x600 and I wonder if there
is a quick way or
> small
> program or using css that I can quickly change the
resolution - at least
> most
> of the site. Just so you know what I'm talking about,
here is the site -
> www.caledoniaclubhouse.co.uk
> As you will see I made life difficult for myself by
using a fixed
> background
> image of the "box".
> I need a painless way of converting all the buttons etc
to 1024x768 but my
> knowledge doesn't stretch that far.
> Been looking around the net but thought I'd get the best
advice here. ;o)
> Many thanks for reading.
> Greg
>

Hi, i am looking for a decision. shall i buy a 21,5 2,7 ghz or 2,8 ghz imac?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for