Hi, the issues is Aperture,

i don't know what to do this is what it says after download:
Dyld Error Message: Library not loaded: /Library/Frameworks/PluginManager.framework/Versions/B/PluginManager Referenced from: /Applications/Aperture.app/Contents/M
i bought my macbookpro in the early 2011 i've done the update all! anybody knows the solution?Help!

https://discussions.apple.com/community/professional_applications/aperture

Similar Messages

Help: Just finished shooting a wedding and Aperture crashes constantly during editing. All pic's in RAW and even after making sure I have the latest Aperture update, I have had to rebuild my library twice and "repair" does not seem to fix the issue. Help?

Help: Just finished shooting a wedding and Aperture crashes constantly during editing. All pic's in RAW and even after making sure I have the latest Aperture update, I have had to rebuild my library twice and "repair" does not seem to fix the issue. Help?

Well!
If you have ThunderBolt, I would go with such for an External Working Drive, spinning platter or SSD depending on your budget
This does not have to be huge just big enough to house your most current Jobs
Once the Current Job is put to rest I would move it to a larger multi bay hard drive unit, USB or FireWire nothing fancy, no RAID, set up as one single Disk
This would only be accessed when something is needed from a past Job so the connection does not have to be speedy
The Drobo would be relegated to Vaults and backups
You can set up a Vault on the Drobo to back up the External Working Library and then Reconnect it when you have moved the Library over to the other Enclosure
This has worked for me pretty smoothly for a long while, but I have found over the years that one can not assume all people work in the same manner! :-)

Turning the corner with Aperture. Performace improved, a few issues remain

First off, let me apologize for being a harsh SOB early on.
I have made improvements in my Aperture understanding and workflow. My machine is a dual 2 GHz(not dual core) G5, that HAD the stock Radeon 9600 card, 2 GB RAM, and the Aperture library is on a second 250 GB SATA internal drive and vaulting goes out to a Lacie D2 500 GB external FW800 disk.
After reading this and other boards, I decided to upgrade my video card to the X 800XT which made my Aperture experience very snappy and in turn me happy(er). I have yet to try overclocking the card(with software) to see if I get a further perfomance bump.
Another thing that has improved my experience is adding another display. This was cheap for me as I still have my four year old 17" Apple Studio Display that came with my DP 800 G4. I really need to eBay that!
Calibrating that display with my 20" was a snap with a Spyder2PRO.
Faster graphics and an extra screen has made a big difference in my workflow with being able to have a separate display for viewing/adjusting/cropping and doing compares.
THAT said, improvements that are still needed:
Speeding up the jpg generation(exporting and web pages)
--Sharpening doubles the time to export, this can be an issue on weddings with 500-600 proofs
Posterizing/loss of gradients of shadow areas
Output from D2X NEFS is chock full of aliasing(ya OS update for that)
More templates for web, contact sheets, and books, books really need shadow/glow effects as well
More book sizes, PLEASE!
Integration with other pro labs like WhiteHouse Color, Kodak's prices are way out of line with their competitors
11x14 not offered for ordering
More printing options similar to CS2 picture packages
So, I am turning the corner with Aperture and looking forward to the release of 10.4.4 and Aperture 1.XX
-John

Dual monitors - I'm running a 22" CRT as the main monitor with a 20" Cinema Display as the secondary monitor, and found for most purposes that the best combination is to have the main monitor set up as 'multi' but without the viewer pane showing, and the secondary monitor set up as 'span' - any thumbnails you select on the main monitor are shown on the secondary monitor, leaving you lots of space to see big thumbnails.
Obviously for books and web galleries you need to show the viewer pane (V), but you still get to see selected images large on the secondary screen.
Ian

I am trying to organize thousands of images in aperture. The dates on the old scanned images is all 2008, when I started importing them. When I change the date in aperture some of them hold the modified date and some revert to 2008. Any ideas?

I am trying to organize thousands of old images in aperture. Aperture dates them all in 2008, when I started this project. When I change the date in aperture some of them hold the modified date and some revert to 2008. Any ideas?

I just tried a test library, re-imported fresh images from a hard drive, and the date changes still revert.
So neither your external drive nor your Aperture library are to blame.
What do you mean test in a different user acct? Would it be a good idea to uninstall and re-download aperture 3?
Appreciate all your help.
I meant the trouble shooting procedure described here: Isolating an issue by using another user account
To test, if some settings in your user account are faulty or preferences files corrupted, it helps to create a new user account from the "Users&Groups" System preferences. With a brand new user account you can see, if something in your current account is causing this.
Should you see, that Aperture is not even working from a new and clean account, I'd reinstall Aperture, and if need be the Operating system. Are you using any plug-ins?

Some of thy images are appearing pixelated. any idea on how to get the issue fixed

some of my images in Aperture/iPhoto are appearing pixelated. any idea on how to get the issue fixed

Where can I find a copy of that? Like if I were to completely delete everything on my ipod, what would I do to go about restoring my songs?
Also I have a theory that one of the videos on my ipod is causing all the other stuff. However, I can't delete videos off my ipod (see https://discussions.apple.com/message/20313736?ac_cid=tw123456#20313736). Is there any way i can get the music from the backup but not the videos?

I have been considering buying Aperture 3 but the numerous, negative reviews are making me wary. Should I buy the first version - Aperture 2.1.1 instead?

I have been considering buying Aperture 3 but the numerous, negative reviews are making me wary. Should I buy the first version - Aperture 2.1.1 instead?
I have a 2009 MacBook Pro running Snow Leopard. I do not think I will upgrade to Lion because I was warned that it may conflict with some of my applications.
There have been so many reviews that talk about how Aperture 3 is so slow and spends too much time searching for Faces and eventually crashes. And, many reviews mention that you need to add to your RAM which I can't do right now, especially on a 3 year old computer.
There are some copies Aperture 2 on Amazon. Would that be a good place to buy a copy or a used copy?
I would appreciate some good advice. Thanks, Taf Schaefer

Obviously you haven't read the reviews of Aperture 2
FWIW I use Ap3 on both a 2010 MBP (8 gigs of Ram) and an 2008 iMac (4 gigs) and I have no crashing issues whatever. Remember, you can disable Faces if you don't want to use that feature.
Elv07 wrote:
I used to use iPhoto and I will probably revert to that (although it has fewer function like no RAW import etc.)
Just an FYI: iPhoto supports exactly the same Raws as Aperture.
Regards
TD

There was an error opening the database for the library "~/Pictures/Apertur

There was an error opening the database for the library “~/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary”.
What's up with this? Aperture showed this error a couple times before quitting when I tried to open it.

I got the same error. Normally I would perform a Repair Database command by holding down Option-Command while launching Aperture, but that just gave me the same error without any options to repair the database.
Instead, I had to follow these instructions in the Aperture user manual. The key is to locate the Aperture library file on your hard drive and then hold Option-Command while double-clicking the Aperture library file.
Choose the REPAIR DATABASE option.
-- excerpt from user manual --
To repair or rebuild your Aperture library
Close Aperture, if it’s open.
Locate the Aperture library you want to fix, then hold down the Command and Option keys while double-clicking the Aperture library.
The Aperture Library First Aid dialog appears.
In the Aperture Library First Aid dialog, do one of the following:
To repair the permissions of the files within your Aperture library: Select Repairing Permissions.
This option should be used when Aperture can’t access some of the image files within the database or Aperture is unable to open the library itself. The Repairing Permissions option reviews each file in your Aperture library and sets the read and write access of each file where appropriate, allowing Aperture to access the files again.
Note: This option does not relocate referenced images whose master image files are offline. For more information about reconnecting offline images, see Reconnecting Missing or Offline Referenced Images.
To repair your Aperture library file: Select Repair Database.
This is the first option you should use if you believe there is something wrong with the Aperture library other than image file access issues.
To rebuild your database from scratch: Click Rebuild Database.
This option should be used as your last measure as it can be time-consuming for large image libraries. If you have tried repairing your database, and the issues you are encountering with your Aperture library still persist, you should use the Rebuild Database option. Aperture examines the library’s entire database and rebuilds each component until it reconstitutes your original Aperture library.
Depending on your selection, click Repair or Rebuild.
Aperture either fixes file permissions within the library or repairs or rebuilds the library, and then opens the application workspace.

Full screen mode - Issue with Aperture freezing

Hi I have an issue with Aperture 3 freezing if I send an image to a plug-in or external editor while in full screen dual display mode. I have to exit full screen mode first and then send to photoshop/external plugin.
It is not a huge deal and a simple workaround but if I forget to do it Aperture will freeze and I will have to force quit the application.
Any thoughts or suggestions welcome.
Thanks!

Just send a comment to Apple via "Aperture→Provide Aperture Feedback".
IME, both full-screen mode and dual-display mode have some rough edges. (I don't expect any improvements until OS 10.7, which is widely reported to include a full re-design of full-screen mode.)

DNG file Issue in Aperture

Until Apple decides to support Nikon D300 NEFs, I am forced to convert NEFs to DNGs (using Adobe Camera Raw 4.3.1) and then import the DNGs into Aperture (I am using version 1.5.6 under Tiger 10.4.11). However, I have just run into a very strange problem that I cannot solve. I had used ACR to remove some camera sensor dust spots on several images before saving the images to DNGs. Then I imported the DNGs into my Aperture projects. However, when I look at the DNGs, none of the changes that I made in ACR appear. In other words, it's like all of the image adjustments made to the NEFs in ACR (and properly saved as DNGs) have been ignored in Aperture when I open the DNGs. To clarify, Aperture is reading the DNGs, but the image adjustments are not there. I cannot figure out what's going on.

Jim F wrote:
The file has been converted to a DNG - it's no longer a NEF. Aperture can read DNGs, right?
Only normally when it's for a camera it already supports. That's because the combination of Mac OS X plus Aperture only supports DNG files that contained the original RAW image data (i.e. not linear DNGs, which have the image data decoded into an intermediate form.)
(There have been various lively threads about this very issue in the past. Here's one of them: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6041001)
Apple's "Tech Specs" page for Aperture (as of version 1.5.6, today 28 Dec 2007) still has the footnote "1. DNG files must be generated by the Adobe DNG Converter, with the "Convert to Linear Image" option turned off, and created from RAW formats that are otherwise already supported by Mac OS X 10.4.3 or later."
But it sounds like you're saying that you've successfully got D300 NEF data, encoded into a non-linear form of DNG with the latest Adobe Camera Raw converter, being displayed by Aperture? This is interesting news indeed.

Is anyone else having issues with Aperture 3 since downloading Lion?

Hi All,
Is anyone else having issues with Aperture 3 after downloading the Lion update? Aperture 3 is running so ssssslllloooowwww !!! I am a sports photographer who needs this to run the way it used to with Snow Leopard. Any suggestions?????
Thanks,
George

It was one of the many issues I had when I was running Lion. I watched the beach balls and the very, very slow rendering of image edits and restored back to my SL clone immediately. It was looking like Aperture 2 and my sanity just couldn't take that again.
I have to assume that Apple must have tested Lion with Aperture 3, but you wouldn't know it from how it behaved on my system.

Link externally edited files to the original, like Aperture does

This is one thing I really like about Aperture - when you edit files externally, Aperture keeps track of them, and keeps them associated with the original. That little bit of housekeeping is a very nice touch.

From the way you are describing the display issue this sounds like a bug that I have been screaming at Apple about for about 9 months. The bug is in CoreImage and effects everything in OS X that uses the coreimage library to display PSD files.
The issue is caused by having ANY saved alpha channels in an image, these are either created manually by you or automatically by saving a selection. Check the PSD in photoshop, click the channels tab and look for any channel that is not part of the color model itself, if one is there it is causing the display issue. If you do not need this channel then just delete it, if you must have it for some reason the work around is to load the alpha channel into a blank layer layer mask and then get rid of it. If you need it back reverse the process. Bottom line if you have a save an alpha channel it will display all wild and crazy everywhere in OS X that uses core image.
RB

Yet another export issue with Aperture 3

Judging by a search of topics, there seem to be a myriad of problems associated with getting files out of Aperture, some of which represent occult setting issues, others which seem to be actual bugs. I've run into an issue which seems to defy categorization, and I'm not sure if it's me doing something wrong, or if it is actually yet another bug with this software. I've been an Aperture user since 1.0 and I have to say the current version I'm running (3.4.3) is by far the worst yet. Anyway, enough whining. Here are the issues:
I'm running Aperture on a 6 core Mac Pro with Lion 10.7.5. There are two thing happening.
1. Exporting JPEGs is INCREDIBLY slow - perhaps as long as 4 or 5 minutes for a 3MB file.
2. This is the one driving me batty right now. Tried exporting a batch of images as JPEGs at the 50% original size setting. The master files are large 16 bit TIFF images from Nikon D800 RAW files, post-processed in Nik HDR Efex Pro 2. They are 80-100MB in size. When I export the images to a file on my Desktop, it consistently exports 6- 10 KB thumbnails. I've checked and rechecked my export settings and can find nothing amiss there. Has anyone else had a similar experience? Could the view I'm working in have anything to do with this? I work 95% of the time in split view.
Thanks,
Russ

I agree that there re a lot of posts about exporting, but a very large number of them refer to the same thing, and it's not a bug, but rather a misunderstanding.
For instance:
Tried exporting a batch of images as JPEGs at the 50% original size setting.
Okay.
The master files are large 16 bit TIFF images from Nikon D800 RAW files, post-processed in Nik HDR Efex Pro 2
Not relevant.
They are 80-100MB in size.
Not relevant either.
Why?
Because size refers to the dimensions of the image. So a 1,000 x 1,000 pixel image exported at 50% will turn out as 500 x 500 pixels.
Were you expecting a jpeg between 40 and 50 MB? That's Jpeg quality or the amount of compression applied to the image. And as you're compressing a lossless format (tiff) to a lossy one, and one with an aggressive compression algorithm, he resulting Jpeg, even at high quality, will be much, much smaller, more likely in the 6 - 8 MB range.
That's the nature - and indeed the point - of Jpegs.
So, if you're getting 6 - 10 kb images, you're exporting at a very low Jepg Quality.
This may also explain why it's taking so long to export. Getting rid on 99.99% of the data and compressing into 10kb is always going to take time.

Printing issues with Aperture 3 - color management

I just made three prints of the same images, two with Aperture 3 that turned out very dark and off color, almost as it they were printed without color management or double profiles. I then printed the third by exporting the image to CS4 and printing with the same settings (rendering intend, printer settings and custom printer profile) and that print looks fine. Has anyone else run into similar problems with A#? I did not have this issue with Aperture 2.
Thanks,
Message was edited by: pcalvin

I print on an Epson 2880 with Lyson inks and custom profiles. In Aperture 2 it worked perfectly, with exactly the same settings as for printing Photoshop - using the laboratory prescribed settings:perceptual and no black point compensation in Photoshop, and Adobe RGB Gamma 2.2 in the Print settings.
Using the same profile and settings with Aperture 3, the colours are way, way off - exactly as described.
I then tried with Aperture 3 turning off the Adobe RGB setting, so there was no colour space adjustment in the Print setting. This gave a slightly better result, but rather dead and slightly blue.
I ran some tests with the GretagMacbeth colour chart used in preparing the profiles, which confirmed the above but also shows a lack of sharpness when printing from Aperture 3, and a blue border on three sides of the image - even though the border was set to 0.00. I have checked the printer head adjustments and run the test chart through Photoshop again to verify these are Aperture 3 artefacts.
Unless this is resolved, it renders Aperture completely useless! (I have tried reinstalling printer drivers, to no effect).

Unable to roatate picture using the trackpad For Aperture

I'm having issue in rotating images with the trackpad with aperture. i've updated it to 2.1.2 so it should work. the rotating functions works with iphoto but not this. any advice?

Sorry,there is only touch capture.I was thinking about volume key that can be used to take a picture.Try to clear data for camera under settings-apps-all.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us - J.R.R. Tolkien

The Future of Aperture

Does anyone know what the future of aperture is? Should I wait until the dust clears and version 2.0 is available? Suggestions?
Thanks!
Rick

It really depends what you want help with. If I never use Bridge again it will be too soon. Not everybody agrees.
But for me, working directly on RAW D200 images without going through ACR is a joy. I am absolutely getting benefit from Aperture now, and frankly have been since 1.0 although (only with D100 and scanned negs).
There are so many items that are useful. The direct access to Photoshop CS2 is exactly what I need for compositing and heavy editing. But let me tell you, I need to externally edit - less, and less.
You need to play with it at an Apple store, and imagine how you would use it. For many, Aperture is very valuable time saver despite some feature issues.
I is very, very subjective.
My two cents.
Michael

Hi, the issues is Aperture,

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for