Hidden file when converting from raw to jpeg. How to delete this?

I just found out that when converting raw into jpeg in Photoshop there is a hidden file enclosed starting with ._ Computers don't see them but televisions do. I discovered this because I want to show a batch of my images on a television with a usb of a sd card. It shows my images and after each normal image I get a black image with a questionmark. It says 'cannot read this file' and it shows the name of the image but with a ._ in front of it. For instance garden.jpg and then -_garden.jpg. Computers don't read images starting with ._ but televisions seem to do so. I want to delete these ._ images because I cannot show a slide show of my images on a television. Anyone can help? It seems that this hidden file is incorporated into the jpeg file.
Thanks in advance!

Thanks. I have thought of this solution but these files are not showing when I set it this way. I had a specialist helping me to find this problem and he was very surprised that these hidden files didn't show up in his special program for showing hidden information. Only when going deeper and deeper into this program these files showed on his computer. As they are incorporated into the original file (the jpeg version) you don't seem to be able to delete them. What do people do when they want to show (jpeg converted from raw)images on their tv?
I have a Mac if that helps.

Similar Messages

  • Saving from bridge and converting from raw to jpeg

    why can I not convert from raw to jpeg in bridge (camera raw) and save to a location different from the  original

    Yep sure can.
    In bridge select your picture(s) then edit in camera raw.
    In camera raw look in the bottom left of the camera raw dialog box and you will see a save as button.
    This will allow you to save your raw files as jpg, tiff or pngs.

  • "Convert" from RAW to JPEG?

    I normally shoot in RAW so I have the power to make more accurate corrections, if needed. 90% of the time I don't need the RAW image after I've made adjustments, however. Here's what I would like to accomplish using Aperture 3:
    -Import RAW images
    -Make adjustments to photos as needed
    -"Convert" all images 3 stars and below to JPEG and replace (i.e. DELETE) all associative Master RAW images.
    What I've been doing is exporting all the images to my desktop after I've made the adjustments, delete all the photos out of the album, and re-import the JPEG images into the album.
    Obviously, this is not a very efficient method and a "convert" option would be nice to use if it's present.

    The answer is 'No'.
    There is no way of doing what you want, many of us in the real world would love that. I for one understand your question from the stand point of I don't want to save every image I ever take in RAW because of the file size.
    If you camera can support taking photos in RAW+Jpeg, then there is a route to take that is discussed in this thread:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2375402&start=0&tstart=0
    In essence, with RAW+Jpeg, you take a photo in both formats. Note the Jpeg version captures the photo with your camera settings intact (i.e. Creative mode settings, saturation, picture style 'stuff' as an example).
    You import (have to choose in import, bottom right corner...outlined in above thread) and then choose which you want to keep Raw and which to keep in jpeg.
    That is, for the moment, the best route to take....if you can. Not all cameras offer Raw+Jpeg.
    Best of luck! I know your pain!

  • PSE changes time of pictures when changed from RAW to JPEG?

    The RAW files of my pictures show the true time the picture was taken. But when I save the file as a JPEG format, it adds more hours to the actual time. What is causing PSE to do this and how do I correct it??

    Or have you stripped the Metadata during the Export.....if you have "Copyright Only" selected in the Metadata section of the Export dialog, all original dates are stripped, and you'll get only the file created/modified dates (which will be the date/time of export).

  • Convert from RAW to Jpeg on iPad?

    Do any of the 3rd party photography apps let you convert RAW images to Jpeg on the iPad itself?
    Do any of them let you change the resolution, especially resize to 72 dpi for Web viewing?

    I don't know of any applications that can access the actual RAW data.
    Even the iPad photos app doesn't really understand RAW ... I believe that it is just showing you the embedded jpg that exists in all RAW formats.
    I believe that some of the photo apps (such as "Photogene for iPad") can also read in the embedded jpg and resize / adjust / etc. the photo and then let you send the photo to other apps such as Facebook. How well this will work will depend on the size of the embedded jpg in the RAW format you use. My camera is the 5D mark II which has full resolution jpg files. Other cameras (like the original 5D) have much smaller embedded jpgs.

  • Distorted Files when converting from Excel to PDF

    Hello,
    I work in IT and I have an annoying issue that when someone using Excel 2007 clicks on the acrobat tab to create a PDF from excel. The finished PDF file is distorted, and will not show the files as they should be. Part of the graph will be missing. I tried uninstalling and reinstalling Adobe Acrobat Pro X, the only thing that happened was that when creating a new user, the new user is able to create a perfect excel to PDF file with no issue, but the original user with the issue still has the same problem. Is there a setting that will fix this? 

    Hi,
    Please share your file if possible so that I can look into the problem. Please use below link:
    https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=qJiclooYWGGNFtWfj8g3wg#
    thank you.
    Hisami

  • Black frames at the end of an exported file when converting from 60p to 24p

    I have another export issue that I can't figure out.
    I import footage I shot at 23.98fps (on a JVC HD100) using a Kona LH card at 59.94fps DVCPro HD, in which it has a 2:3 cadence. I need to make files that are actually 23.98p DVCProHD. Unfortunately, when I export in Final Cut from the 59.94 original, the new 23.98 file has all of the image, exported correctly, followed by a number of black frames such that the total number of frames in the exported file equals the number of frames in the original file. That is:
    If the original 59.94 file was 3s long, that is 60 * 3 = 180 frames. The exported 23.98 file also has 180 frames, but only 3s of image = 3 * 24 = 72 frames, followed by 180 - 72 = 108 frames = 4s 12frames of black.
    How can I prevent this from happening, and end up with an exported file that is (e.g.) just the 3s of image, and not 7.5s of which 4.5s are black?
    It's true that I can manually clip this black off, but I need to do many clips as a batch, and would really not have to change one clip at a time. It is also true that I can do a batch in compressor, and that this process does not suffer this problem -- that is, there is no extra black -- however, there is another problem: the original 59.94 DVCProHD files are actually 1280x720 with square pixels; the files exported from FCP via the KONA DVCProHD codec maintain this true HD proportion, but the ones exprted through compressor (which does not appear to support the KONA LH implementation of DVCProHD as an option) have the size 960x720 with anamorphic pixels, and I would rather keep the original size. Thus, I would rather export from fcp. If anyone has any insight into how I might resolve this....
    Thanks,
    Robert Schaller

    Thanks. If I understand you correctly, it does seem to export correctly if I paste the 59.94 clip into a 23.98 sequence (you can't nest sequences that have different time bases) and export from there, and it doesn't even have to specify square pixels, etc.: the AJA codec implementation seems to take care of that. There is no longer any extra black, so, per file, that gives the right result.
    That, however, is only one part of the problem, though a significant part. Next is, I really would like to do this as a batch process, as I tend to have many clips to do at one time. As soon as I try any kind of batch export, I end up with one of two problems:
    1) if I try to batch export from fcp, I'm back to having extra black frames, or
    2) if I try to batch export with compressor, I get 960x720 files.
    If anyone has any suggestions on how to get the right files in a batch, that would be the next step. Is fcp scriptable? And, if so, can you write a script that takes a clip, pastes it into a blank 23.98 DVCPro timeline, sets the correct in and out points (i.e, in at the beginning and out 1 before the end), exports it with a specified codec and time base, with a name based on the source clip, and then repeats that as needed?
    Thanks for any input --
    Robert Schaller

  • Changes in line definition when converting from Freehand to jpeg format

    When I change my maps into jpeg formats, the lines change.
    e.g. a dahed line may become dashes and dots, not as they were drawn. This has happened since I had a new hard disk in my iMac.
    Can anyone help?
    Blodwin

    I would try other raster-based formats like TIF and PNG to see if the problem is there. Also does this change happen to all dashed lines or only on a certain type of line? I would try various line widths, colors, straight/curve, group/ungroup, etc. to find if any variables cause this to happen or not.
    Also, with the new Hard Drive did you reinstall the OS and Applications or was this a separate drive from your startup dirve? Did you have to reinstall FreeHand and remember to add all the updates? also set the preferences to your last version?

  • Lock a PDF file when converted from Smartform

    Hello Experts,
    In our current project we have an urgent requirement to apply a Lock to a PDF document
    so it cannot be amended. This is a PDF document and not an Adobe interactive
    form, which currently cannot be used on the project. We are seeking help from
    other colleagues who have had successful experience in achieving the creation
    of a lock to the PDF document which is generated as an output from a SAP Smart
    Form and then e-mailed to the recipient, in this case end Customers, therefore
    integrity of information to prevent changes is a legal requirement. We are
    aware of an encrypted password option but in this case we need to apply a lock
    to the PDF document.
    Many Thanks in advance,
    Kind Regards,
    Nikhil

    Does your pdf reader plugin need updating, are you on version 7, whilst current version is v10
    * see [[opening pdf files within firefox]]
    * and [[using the adobe reader plugin with firefox]]

  • Default PR Type when convert from Planned Order

    Hi all,
    How can I default my PR Type when convert from Planned Order after MRP run. This can done via MRP Group control but how to go about controlling via Planned Order profile?
    Which planned object type and planned order profile to be used? assuming that i need my planned to be output at LA type and convert to NB1 PR type instead of the default NB PR type?
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Andrew

    Hi,
    The system determines the document type from the stettings u are making in "planned order Profile" in Customising for MRP. There u define the order type, the procurement key and the special procurement key and also the account assignment category. So based on the procurement key and the special procurement key maintained in the Marterial master, the document type is selected.
    Production > Materials Requirement Planning > Procurement Proposals > Planned Order > Define order profile
    Choose the planned order type - NB1 Within this you specify the P req doc type to be used.
    Through MRP group and the different PR document type for MRP generated PR is possible only if you assign the document type to MRP group in the MRP configuration.
    Please try and come back.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar
    Edited by: R Brahmankar on Aug 28, 2008 10:54 AM

  • When converting an image from raw to jpeg , the jpeg can look flat compared to the original raw image . Is there anything I can do about this ?

    When converting an image from raw to jpeg , the jpeg can look flat compared to the original raw image . Is there any way to prevent this ?

    Hi Joe , Thank you for your quick response . I am viewing the jpeg in Microsoft Picture Manager and Flickr. It 's not always really noticeable , but for example if I shoot into the light with dew on the grass , the dew glistens in LRoom and I'm happy with the shot but when I convert it to jpeg ,it looks dull. I have changed the setting to sRGB - from Adobe 1998 ,but don't see much difference.  Kind regards   Alberto.

  • How do I process multiple files and turn them from raw to jpeg

    How do I process multiple files and turn them from raw to jpeg. Ive tried and it seems to go through the files but doesnt seem to process them or store them in the selected folder

    Yes that was the first thing I did. Then I used the process multiple files and selected a new folder to put them in and selected use open files and selected to turn them into jpeg. The images flash on the screen like they are being processed, but the folder never appears in library. Is it possible because there are a couple 16 bit files open that this corrupts the task. Do I need to create the folder first. Will elements not create the folder on its own.
    Thanks Vince

  • I have an iMac running Mavericks 10.9.4 I also have about 30 Kodack photo CDs that I wish to convert from PCD to Jpeg but Mavericks will not see the files, they are grey.  Is there any way to convert them?

    I have an iMac running Mavericks 10.9.4 I also have about 30 Kodack photo CDs that I wish to convert from PCD to Jpeg but Mavericks will not see the files, they are grey.  Is there any way to convert them or must I do it on another machine?
    Kaibil

    iPhoto used to support the PCD format up to a few years ago. It's extremely frustrating that Apple decided to no longer support this format and now I'm directed to pay nearly $40 for an app that will (GraphicConverter 9). Did Lemke Software make a deal with Apple so we'd have to pay a premium for a very overpriced converter? And, how are decisions like this supposed to encourage the use of iPhoto?
    Apple users already pay a premium to use a Mac. Obstacles like these eventually destroy loyalty to the Apple brand. Just ask Microsoft how their back room deals that exploited their customer base worked out for them.

  • How did my pdf files get converted from 'open with Adobe Reader' to open with Adobe Acobat'?  And if I have a ''free'' Acrobat account why does it not open?  When I do click on the account it ask me to pay $89.99.  I never wanted Acrobat.  How can I get -

    How did my stored files get converted from 'open with Adobe READER' to 'open with Adobe ACROBAT'? How can I get them re-set to open with 'Adobe Reader'?
    Please reply to my e-mail:   [email protected]

    It sounds as if you downloaded Adobe Acrobat Pro. If you did, uninstall it. Then repair Adobe Reader.
    The free Acrobat account has no connection to any of this.

  • I'm experiencing a red cast when converting from prophoto profile to srgb.

    This cast does not show up on my monitor but on some other monitors and my Iphone display. I'm using an IMAC 10.6.4 and CS5. I have re-calibrated my monitor which only makes matters a little worse. I have the system preference set for prophoto as well. I'm truely stumped Please HELP.
    Bob

    Mr. Rose,
    Richard Rose2 wrote:
    …"asinine . .  and ignorant. . . " well, I've been called worse…
    Aside from the fact that I do regret not finding more appropriate terms, please note that I applied them not to you personally but to the concepts expressed in the statement I was referencing.
    Richard Rose2 wrote:
    I'll back up here and modify one thing I said:
    There's no real advantage working in ProPhoto when the image is coming in from anything other than a very high end digital camera.
    I still disagree.  DSLRs under $1,000 do a fine job these days, some of them are closer to $500.  You might want to take another look at the current market. 
    Richard Rose2 wrote:
    … Point and shoot cameras, even good ones and anything in JPEG format, which is the way a great deal of photographers really do work
    Sunday snap shooters, maybe; not pro photographers.
    Richard Rose2 wrote:
    There's no real advantage working in ProPhoto when the image is coming in from anything other than a very high end digital camera. Point and shoot cameras, even good ones and anything in JPEG format, which is the way a great deal of photographers really do work, no matter how expensive their equipment, certainly do not contain color information in the ProPhoto gamut.
    By converting them in-camera from raw to JPEGs, yes, by definition they have been constricted to the narrower gamut of Adobe RGB or sRGB.  Duh! 
    Richard Rose2 wrote:
    …Jeff is able to surround himself with high end equipment…
    He often works with a Canon Digital Rebel in fully automatic mode when walking about, hardly a "high end" camera.  He just shoots RAW and does the processing in Camera Raw later on.  Watch that video, he actually names the camera model.
    Richard Rose2 wrote:
    …. (shrug) I also have spent a professional career getting photographers' work onto one kind of printing medium or another.
    Ooooh, I'm highly tempted to ask for the name of your shop, just so I can avoid it. 
    Richard Rose2 wrote:
    …I can show you case after case of disappointing results for the reasons I have already described…
    I can come up with even more examples of shoddy work by incompetent pigs masquerading as painters, physicians and assorted other professions.  Totally irrelevant.
    Richard Rose2 wrote:
    …Ask a thousand pro photographers what "named color space" even means and they won't have the faintest idea how to respond.  The few that do hang out in places like this and throw around terms like you, I and Jeff do. This place, and certainly the upper-levels that Jeff moves around in are not the "real world."
    But it is in THIS VERY PLACE that this discussion is taking place!  If you had posted elsewhere, (1) I may not have even read your comment and (2) it's entirely possible that it would have been appropriate for another audience or readership.  The issue is what you wrote HERE.  At least that is what I was addressing in this context.
    Not for a second do I believe that you have asked even ten photographers what a given color space means, let alone "a thousand pro photographers".  That is preposterous, and, at best, it would be an indication of the circles in which you move around.
    Richard Rose2 wrote:
    …And many will actually respond with anger at the idea that they need to understand anything coming close to  the words "Color Managed Workflow…"
    Which is why it would be an extremely dumb idea for me to go around asking that question of a thousand individuals, as you rhetorically suggest. 
    Finally, I would repeat that I do agree that the original poster probably shouldn't be using ProPhoto RGB given his lack of understanding of color management at this point.
    Once again, sorry for the unflattering, clumsy terms I used to describe your statements.
    Wo Tai Lao Le
    我太老了

Maybe you are looking for