Hide Simple Filter

Hi Experts
I am looking for a option to hide simple filter for some of the users in enterprise. I tried modifying below rights.
Interactive: General - Ability to hide / show toolbars
Interactive: Reporting - Create and edit report filter
I am still seeing the simple filter in Webi Reports.
Please advice
Re: Disable "Add Simple Report Filter" from WEBI XI3

Prasath,
I noticed in the post in your link, it mentioned making sure the developer of the report saves it with the filter area suppressed. Could that be the issue?
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Display null value:Report Filter using Show/hide report filter

    Hi,
    Is there any documentation from SAP BO that says "Report Filters don't display nulls."?
    Report Filter as in by clicking the Show/Hide Report Filter in the Infoview toolbar.
    Please help.
    Thank you.

    Hai
    u r Thread is similar  to
    http://www.forumtopics.com/busobj/viewtopic.php?p=848982&sid=2a66a2348c7042773baaf7bfd10241b2

  • How to hide or filter out the row at break subtotal level

    Hi All,
    Need to know how to hide or filter out a row at break subtotal level.
    My Requirement is to sum up the first 20 business days total as Month total.
    This is a cross tab report, with Dates going from top to bottom, Securities going from left to right and Amount as the intersection of this two dimensions.
    So I have created a variables like this below
    RunningCount of Mtr Dt=ToNumber(RunningCount([Query 1].[Intrader Acct Mtrty Dt]))
    and
    MonthBreak=If [RunningCount of Mtr Dt] Between (1;20) Then 1 else 2
    Inserted this "MonthBreak" variable into the crosstab so it will give me each rowcount, then applied the break on this variable, so it split the first 20 rows and the rest of the remaining rows.
    Then applied Sum on the Amount column so it will add up the first 20 rows and then the remaining rows. Now I want to display only the subtotal row of the first 20rows and hide/filter the row subtotal line for remaining row numbers greater than 21.
    Did tried to do some thing using the alterers but no luck.
    Please help me fix this

    Hi Mathangi,
    When I apply
    =If ([MonthBreak] = 1) then Sum(Amount) else 0
    in the subtotal row, then nothing is changed.
    And one other thing I noticed is when we apply break on a column it footer should be same as the break value right. But here in my report the break footer is displaying 1 for both the cases for first 20 rows break and the rest from 21st rows.
    That is when I place  MonthBreak variable in the table.. which has values 1(for row 1 through 20) and 2 (for rows 21 to end of the report) then apply break on this MonthBreak column, its footer value are same for both the cases which is displaying as 1
    Do you know why this happens and to your information this is a cross tab report I am working on....

  • Trying to convert a Lower HID Keyboard Filter to an Upper filter above kbdhid

    Hello,
    A few months ago I solicited some help regarding writing a filter for a USB/HID keyboard.  Thanks to all who gave help especially DH.  It does work and I can even get diagnostic feed back from it.
    Unfortunately, it seems to lack the flexibility I required.  It is loaded as a lower filter below  kbdhid.   I do get the HID keyboard reports, but I can only change that single report.  I want to be able
    to insert an additional keyboard report ( I want to be able to send another key with it's own modifiers).  I don't see/know how to do it. Here are a couple of options I thought about, but I don't know how to implement either one:
    1)
    It seems to me that one option would be to some how get the kbdhid driver to request a second read from the keyboard WITHOUT an actual keystroke occurring.  Presumably it would be identical to the first one since the pressed keys hasn't changed
    in that brief time.  But, then using this second report one I could change it to insert the desired key/modifier.
    2)
    Another option might be to use an upper filter between kbdhid and kbdclass. (It would have to be before the I8042 to the kbdclass input because  we already have an upper filter for the kbdclass that filter keystroke from a PS/2 keyboard. ) 
    I have tried moving the existing, functional HID filter from a lower filter to an upper filter.  It does load and devcon shows it to be an upper filter above kbdhid.  Debug diagnostics show that DriverEntry gets call and that the EvtIoDeviceControl
    routine gets called a few times initially, just like when it was a lower filter.
    However, the EvtIoRead and EvtIoWrite routines never get called, let alone the ReadCompletion routine.
    Obviously there is something different between lower and upper filters, but what.  Do they take the same callback routines/protocols?
    Also is the output of the kbdhid in HID keyboard report format or has it changed to the KEYBOARD_INPUT_DATA format.
    How can I capture HID keyboard data after kbdhid?
    3)
    Thanks,
    Don

    the way to make this work with your current setup is to queue the read request kbdhid sends and then send down your own request. When you want to report a new key outside of the hw reporting, you complete the queued read with the data. This gets complex
    if the read you send down completes before kbdhid can send another read
    d -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

  • Report in P6 Optional not showing activities set by a simple filter

    it's hopefully a simple one.
    Created a report with an open project, looking at activites - rerpot shows all activities
    When i then add a filter to that report of Finish date = 1st October, I would expect to see all activities finish on that date.
    There are of course other ways of achieving this through differnet pages, but I'd like to know why this doesn't work, if anyone else knows..?

    Give your filter a range -- from 01 OCT 00:00 to 01 OCT 23:59.

  • Hide Query filter values and column width default

    Hello Everyone,
    In our query definition we have default filter(restriction) values.  When query is output it shows these filtered(restricted) values.
    Is there anyway to hide these?  We dont' want users seeing this.
    Also, the column width defaults to the largest output in the column (Excel standard).  Is there anyway to override this?  I tried in a workbook to set the column width to a certain width, but the query did not read this?
    Thanks so much,
    Colleen

    Hi Colleen,
    To set column widths, use the BW Properties dialog.  In Excel, select any cell that is part of query definition, right-click ... you should now see a context-specific dialog.  The last option in the dialog is always Properties.  Go to the Column width tab and pick from there.
    For the filter values ... you should be able to delete these cells and they should not re-appear (unless someone goes to the BW toolbar and selects Layout >> Display text elements).
    Hope this helps.
    - Pete

  • Simple Filter Problems

    I've been having some problems doing a simple Window Filter in Oracle Spatial. Here's the query I'm executing:
    select * from dcdb
    where mdsys.sdo_filter(
    geoloc,mdsys.sdo_geometry(
    3,NULL,NULL,mdsys.sdo_elem_info(1,3,3),
    mdsys.sdo_ordinates(483740.50,7201372.69,485970.57,7203080.09)),
    'querytype=window') = 'TRUE';
    This should return all records within the specified UTM window. However, I get the following error:
    ERROR at line 5:
    ORA-00904: invalid column name
    This indicates that the column-name 'mdsys.sdo_ordinates' is incorrect. How can this possibly be? Is there something I've missed during installation of the product? I note that the following error occurs when I type 'describe mdsys.sdo_geometry' in SQLPlus:
    Name Null? Type
    SDO_GTYPE NUMBER
    SDO_SRID NUMBER
    SDO_POINT SDO_POINT_TYPE
    ERROR:
    ORA-04043: object SDO_POINT_TYPE does not exist
    Thanks in advance of any help you can provide me.
    Jon
    null

    The types name for sdo_ordinates
    field is sdo_ordinate_array
    and the type name for the
    sdo_elem_info
    is sdo_elem_info_array.
    You should use these type names in
    the object constructors and not
    the names of fields.
    So the geometry constructor will be
    like this:
    mdsys.sdo_geometry(2003, NULL,NULL,
    mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,3,1),
    mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(x,y,...)))
    siva
    null

  • Hide "Delete Filter"/ "Filter" - Link in POWL

    Dear all,
    We are on configuring the POWL of our SRM-Portal.
    We have standard filters in the list, we want to have for all users.
    Could you please tell me how we can hide the "Delete Filter" - Link/Button in the POWL?
    Thank you.
    Best regards,
    Thomas

    We don't need a solution anymore. We will let this button/link visible.

  • Action links show link conditionally using simple filter

    Hello Gurus,
    When I set up an interaction with action link, every thing works fine. But when I try to use the 'show link conditionally' using a simple condition, I get an error such as:
    "State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 16001] ODBC error state: 37000 code: 8180 message: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Statement(s) could not be prepared.. [nQSError: 16001] ODBC error state: 37000 code: 8120 message: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Column 'SAWITH3.c6' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.. [nQSError: 16002] Cannot obtain number of columns for the query result. (HY000)"
    Can anyone help with this?
    Thanks

    Try to apply that condition to the report and see how it works
    Btw: check this
    sql - Reason for Column is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the…

  • Simple filter question

    I have a dataset  of many years data.  I want to show the count of records for each of the past 7 days.
    If I add date and record count then run the query, I add a variable:
    =RelativeDate(CurrentDate(); -7) < [Date]
    Then in the report filters panel I filter by this variable = 1, and the correct result returns.  However, with a filter at this level I guess all the data is returned from the database for many years, then on a second step the data is filtered.  We have a lot of data so I would like the filtering to take place in the first step, on the original query.  I can't see how to use a variable or enter a formula into the query filter panel.  I could add this to the universe, but then we will end up with a lot of "filter 7 days", "filter 30 days", ...
    Questions: What is the best way to filter by past 7 days, or how can I add this formula to the query filter?

    Josue,
    Suresh gave a good answer, however, to get back to your original question:
    Questions: What is the best way to filter by past 7 days, or how can I add this formula to the query filter?
    It is always more efficient to filter at the server (database server) level versus bringing more data to the workstation (client), however, for each filter, as you are observing, it requires an object filter to support.  Another way to handle this particular situation might be through the use of a prompt.  You could prompt the user for the number of days (7 or 30, etc) and then you could use one filter object and have maximum flexibility.
    Thanks,
    John

  • Hide Filter Values

    Hello Experts is it possible to hide the Filter values in our reports, i mean after opening the report from WAD, you have free characteristics, rows and columns, beside that you have filter where you filter based on paticular value....
    But in my senerio when i clcik on filter button, it is giving me a list of all the values for that column, sfter that i have the text boxes with filter range.
    Is it possible for me to remove all the values that are displaying above the text boxes, so that i can have only the Text boxes where the user can enter the desired values..
    Thank you,
    Kris...

    Kris,
    I am not sure if that is possible. One more way to do it would be to have a separate pop up instead and take in the user's input and pass it along the URL. Only thing is you will have to do a lot more JavaScript coding for the same and also input help will be tough to achieve. In short , it is not do able with just a setting.
    Arun
    Assign points if useful

  • Hide filter pane of EVCVW function

    Hi,
    We use the function EVCVW(AppName, Dimension, FilterList).
    =EVCVW("PRESU";"ENTE";"TIPENTSEC95=A")
    When we double click in a cell containing the function, it shows the pop-up with the dimension members and filter pane.
    We want to hide this filter pane so that the user can not change options that we have put in the parameter FilterList of the function EVCVW.
    Best regards,

    Hi Roberto,
    the cell that containts the EVCVW function is blocked and the workbook has a psw.
    with the EVCVW function the user can choose from a list of the dimension member a certain property which are equal to a certain value.
    we want to block or not shown on the right side of the window for selection of members.
    we know there is a button that shows and hides it, but even hide it using the EVCVW function is always displayed when you double-click

  • Hide filter type - row in interactive report

    Hello all,
    how can I deactivate or hide the filter type - row in interactive report and the only option to be filter type - column?
    Is it possible with some javascript?
    Thanks in advance !

    The CSS approach works fine, but I made some improvements:
    1. CSS-Selector is case sensitive
    2. Only select the label with the attribute for="apexir_FILTER_TYPE". Attention: the CSS-Selector for the for-attribute works in IE and Firefox different
    /* Hide IR Filter Type Row */
    #apexir_FILTER_TYPE {
    display:none;}
    /* IE */
    label[htmlFor="apexir_FILTER_TYPE"] {
    display:none;}
    /* Firefox */
    label[for="apexir_FILTER_TYPE"] {
    display:none;}

  • Can you filter a date range in Numbers 3.1?

    It seems crazy... but I can't figure out how to filter a date range in the new Numbers (3.1).  In other words, I have a column with individual dates e.g. 31-Dec-2012, 29-Feb-2013, 19-April-2004, etc.
    I want to filter it so that ONLY the dates from 2012 show up.
    The thing is that the new filters ONLY seem to let you filter from today's date e.g. between 494 and 692 days from today.  Obviously, that isn't what I want, and it seems very wierd that something so basic would be left out.
    What am I missing?

    In the example below Column A has date values and Column B has a simple filter that displays dates if in year 2012.  Pretty simple, likely too simple.  Not sure what/how you want to display but thought I'd get something started.  The formula in Column B is: IF(YEAR(A2)=2012,A2,"").  You can hide column A if desired.

  • LDAP Search filter Jabber for Android

    Hi,
    I have this LDAP Filter which only shows me active users:
    <BaseFilter>(&amp;(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))</BaseFilter>
    I have the same line for Jabber for Android, but it doesn't work.
    <BDIBaseFilter>(&amp;(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))</BDIBaseFilter>
    I get 0 results for any search on Jabber Andorid. When I delete the "BDI" Line for the filter all together, then I get correct results - with photos and everything.
    I also tried a simple filter e.g:
    <BDIBaseFilter>(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))</BDIBaseFilter>
    No search results either.
    Any ideas how to get Filter for Android working?
    Versions:
    Jabber for Android: 10.6
    CUCM: 9.1.2

    I think I found the coresponding messages in the log:
    csf.person.ldap: [LdapSearchQueryHandler.cpp(51)] [start] - reqId = 2
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1482)] [sendSearchQuery] -
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15477 I csf.person.xmpp: [XMPPPersonRecordSource.cpp(268)] [fetchContacts] - Entering.
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1531)] [sendSearchQuery] -  filter  = (&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)(|(sAMAccountName=at1sath))), baseDN=OU=Organization,DC=at,DC=customer,DC=net
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15477 D services-dispatcher: [ServicesDispatcher.cpp(147)] [pumpNext] -  pumpNext.executed (ContactsAdapter::LoadContactsFromSource)
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1576)] [sendSearchQuery] - ldap search error. rc= -7 ,msg=Bad search filter
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1675)] [notifyListenersSearchRequestCompleted] - errorCode=-7
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15477 D services-dispatcher: [ServicesDispatcher.cpp(145)] [pumpNext] -  pumpNext.executing (ContactsAdapter::LoadContactsFromSource)
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1258)] [mapErrorNo] - Code = -7, Msg=Bad search filter
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapSearchQueryHandler.cpp(84)] [onSearchRequestCompleted] - reqId = 1, errcode = 9
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1531)] [sendSearchQuery] -  filter  = (&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)(|(sAMAccountName=at1hafr))), baseDN=OU=Organization,DC=at,DC=customer,DC=net
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1576)] [sendSearchQuery] - ldap search error. rc= -7 ,msg=Bad search filter
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1675)] [notifyListenersSearchRequestCompleted] - errorCode=-7
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1258)] [mapErrorNo] - Code = -7, Msg=Bad search filter
    02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapSearchQueryHandler.cpp(84)] [onSearchRequestCompleted] - reqId = 2, errcode = 9
    The next question is now: Why is it a bad search filter? And what is the correct one? The same filter works on jabber for windows...
    BR, Dave

Maybe you are looking for