Hiding fields in contract management SRM.

Hi,
How can we hide fields in the item data in the process contracts.
the fields that i need to hide are:
product type
vendor number.
Can we achieve it without using the BADI ???
Thanks,
Pradeep.
Edited by: Pradeep Purushottam on Apr 22, 2008 11:28 AM

Hi,
Try the following steps.
1. Create implementation for BADI: BBP_UI_CONTROL_BADI
2. Filter: BUS2000113
3. Method: BBP_CTR_UI_CTRL
4. Here is a sample coding to supress Incoterms field in browser
  if iv_fieldname = 'BBPS_CTR_UI_ITEM-INCOTERM_KEY' or
     iv_fieldname = 'BBPS_CTR_UI_ITEM-INCOTERM_LOC'.
     cv_invisible = 'X'.
     cv_input_ready = ''.
  endif.
5. Comment (<!--  ...... --> ) the incoterm field in respective ITS template.
6. Publish the template.
The fields will be hidden.
Cheers, Renga
Award Points for usefull answers *

Similar Messages

  • Passing custom field in contract in SRM to contract in ECC

    Hi,
    We are using SRM 7.0 with ECC 6 (no EHP). We're planning to use central contract distributed with IDOCs. Our contract in ECC has custom field added in the header. We have tried and successfully pass the contract from SRM to ECC (using IDOC BLAORD03 and COND_A).
    I know we can create custom field in contract in SRM, but how to pass the value in the custom field in SRM contract to custom field in ECC contract? Do we need to edit IDOC BLAORD03? Is it possible?
    Best regards,
    Yosea

    Hi,
    Does anyone know the answer?
    John

  • Setup Central Contract Management SRM 7.01 with differing release versions

    Hello experts,
    OSS note 1268821 explains how to configure the central contract management between a SRM 7.0 and  an ERP 6.04. So far so good, but how should it be handled if there are differing release versions such as ERP 6.04 and ERP 6.03? I guess that a technical split (xml services/ ALE distribution) is necessary?
    Assuming that there are some backends with differing release versions and in some cases with differing master data (not supported by central master data client) would you always go via PI? Independent of release version, technology and master data.
    Could you give some further detailed informations how to configure such a scenario? What has to be done to transfer existing contracts from an ERP 6.04 into SRM CM component (migration concept)?
    Thanks!!!
    KR Thorsten

    Hi Thorsten
    The minimal ECC version is 6.0 EHP4, Central Contracts require certain business functions in ECC to be activated and as these are included within ECC EHP4 you won't have these available in lower version. Therefore you won't be able to operate central contracts in such an ECC system.
    You would either have to go with patching these systems or go with GOA's for these systems.
    Operating central contracts via PI or SOA i believe provide almost similar functionality. SOA however requires an SRM EHP1 system and ECC EHP5 back-end to operate whilst central contracts configured via PI can be operated onwards from an SRM 7.0 and EHP4 system.
    I can't help you on your migration issue, maybe someone else can.
    Kind regards,
    Tim

  • Price and condition in Contract management SRM 7 version

    Dear supporters,
    We work SRM server 550,
    We use the contract management. 
    In SRM 5 SEREVER 550 if you use condition in contract item the price donu2019t present in the lines items and the system present the words "see conditions".
    We consider the upgrading to SRM 7 end we need to know if in this VER' the Contracts present the item price when you using condition in item line.
    Thanks
    Isiaki

    Hi
    the price has more than one prices and you have to click see conditions and see
    orSRM tables;-
    1)       Take the GUID from CRMD_ORDERADM_I table
    2)       And input that GUID to /1CN/CBPSAP016 table
    ECC tables: -
    1)       A016 (Input GOA number and item number)
    2)       You will get KNUMH numbers
    3)       Enter KNUMH numbers in KONP table
    4)       You wil get all the pricing condition details

  • Condition types and Pricing in Contract management - SRM

    Hello,
    We have configured Contract management in SRM 5.0 (Global Outline Agreement).
    I'm trying to create an exact rpelica of the R/3 pricing in SRM. Surprisingly when I created all condition types in SRM, it needs condition group maintenance. which in turn needs an access sequence. Now following are the problems I'm experiencing..
    1. It is allowing to create a condition group maintenance in TTE. Somehow I managed it thru SPRO to create the one under BBP.
    2. No menu path available to create a condition table under BBP. Again the same available for TTE. I managed to create this one as well.
    3. Now the price/net price maintained at line item should get assigned to PB00 by default, but this does not get assigned.
    4. All the documentation talks about implementation of BADI, but that does not help, cuz condition types may be created for new terms/norms in future.
    Anyone has created condition types in SRM and implemented the same in Contract management and successfully replicated the contract in the backend with all condition types carried with values?
    Regards,
    Ashish

    Hi
    you check the bellow table for contacts data.
    ekko--> Contract header data
    ekpo--> Contract item data
    konh--> Conditions header data
    konp--> Conditions Item data
    Regards
    Anand

  • Hiding Fields/Vertically Contracting Frame !?!  Agghh !!

    This is painstakingly annoying !!
    The gist of the problem is this ...
    I have several fields in a repeating group - they are arranged vertically, one on top of the other. If I decide to hide a number of the fields (using conditional formatting) I want the rest to be displayed without any vertical gaps. I can't seem to find an easy way to do this. Hidden fields at the bottom of the repeating frame work out fine as the frame can contract - but only to the point of the next visible item. The real pain is that I want a line separator at the bottom of each record - and if I put that at the bottom of the frame - it won't contract at all - even if all the objects above are hidden ? Any ideas would be gratefully received !!
    Cheers,
    Matt.

    Make the fields in the repeating frame "vertically variable".
    Then add the following code to the Format Trigger of each field:
    IF :&lt;field_name&gt; IS NULL THEN
    RETURN FALSE;
    END IF;
    If you have following configuration:
    Field1
    Field2
    Field3
    Field4
    and Field2 and Field3 are NULL then the layout will contract to:
    Field1
    Field4

  • Custom field in the search criteria of contract management in SRM - POWL

    Hi,
    I have to add a custom field in the search criteria of the POWL query for Contract Management. I have done adjusting of the POWL by adding the custom field in the /SAPSRM/S_POWL_RESULT_CTR and /SAPSRM/S_SEARCH_RESULT_CTR. I have created entries in TREX and Field cat but still the field is not visible in the query.
    Please let me know how can i get the visibility of custom field on the POWL query for contract.
    Regards,
    Geeta

    Hi,
    Try to delete powl query cache using report POWL_D01.
    Regards,
    Marcin

  • SRM - Contract management - product category - SRM 5.0

    Hello,
    The product category was set as mandatory field in the contract management.
    By creating a contract or modifying an existing one, a product category must be selected.
    When I'm connected in English, i can use product category search function, and all the product category are populated.
    I'm so able to select a product category in the contract
    But when I'm connected in French, it is impossible to use the search function because no values are populated.
    I already check the transaction COMM_HIERARCHY, but English and French are already set.
    Thank you for help.

    1. GOA+LOcal contract = Central contratct.pls coreect me
    :- Basically Central Contracts are created in SRM and copied to ECC. Then after you can refer that contract as GOA.
    2. When the central contract is created in SRM is it dcistributed as Contract or Scheduling agreeemtn in ECC.
    :- It's distributed as Contract.
    3. Also, in SRM 7.0 is it possible to create contract directly in ecc from the sourcing cockpit.
    :- No; it's not possible. You have to create contract in SRM first then you can distribute it to ECC.

  • Using SRM for very large contracts and contract management

    We are doing an SRM 7.01 implementation project. SRM will be used primarily for outsourced contract management. The contracts are all services associated with facilitites (plant) maintenance and also support services like cleaning or catering.
    They have very large numbers of items priced individually (e.g. 10,000) per contract. The items price depends on the location the work is expected to be performed. The location is represented in SAP RE-FX architectual object. The price can be priced at any level of the hierarchy e.g. service A is priced the same across the whole state but service B is priced per campus.
    q1. SAP advises that there are performance limitations on SRM contracts >2000 lines. Has anyone experience in a solution to provide very large contracts in SRM? How did you do it please?
    q2. SAP advises to use the plant to represent the location for pricing purposes, but this would result in a very large number of plants. Has any one experience in alternative solutions to for variable location pricing in SRM contracts please? I.e. like integrating the RE-FX architectural object or similar into contract and PO line items.
    thanks very much

    Hi Prakash,
    SRM does provide the facility of contract management with the help of Purchase Contracts and Global Outline Agreements but it is used as part of the sourcing for materials and services. The materials or services have contracts against some given target value against which PO is released. The contract is based on a material number ( eithe material or a service) which will be used as a source of supply during the creation of the Shopping Cart. It might not really fit in the scenario of carrier and freight forwarders but still can be customized for this kind of use.
    The contract management functionalities in the R/3 space can also be looked on for this purpose.
    Reg
    Sachin

  • SRM 7 - Centralised Contract Management SAP XI inbound/outbound interfaces

    Hi there,
    We are busy implementing SRM 7 and I would like to get "centralised contract management" working between SRM 7 and the ECC backend/s (via SAP PI).
    Could you please let me know what the correct SAP PI CONTENT to load is? And what the correct service interfaces I need to use for this scenario as well as what "software component version" and "namespace" I can find them in?
    Any guide on the details of this specific scenario?
    Thanks for the help, much appreciated
    Lynton

    Note 1268821 - SRM 7.0 / ERP 6.04: Config. of Central Contract Management
    Settings in PI
    =================
    For CCM scenario to work, PI set up is required for the following asynchronous enterprise services.
    (Namespace; Software Component Version; Interface:)
    http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SE/Global; SRM SERVER 7.0; PurchasingContractSRMReplicationRequest_Out
    http://sap.com/xi/APPL/Global2; SAP APPL 6.04; PurchasingContractSRMReplicationRequest_In
    http://sap.com/xi/APPL/Global2; SAP APPL 6.04; PurchasingContractSRMReplicationConfirmation_Out
    http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SE/Global; SRM SERVER 7.0; PurchasingContractSRMReplicationConfirmation_In
    http://sap.com/xi/APPL/Global2; SAP APPL 6.04; PurchaseOrderERPContractReleaseNotification_Out
    http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SE/Global; SRM SERVER 7.0; PurchaseOrderERPContractReleaseNotification_In
    Settings in SAP Enterprise Portal
    =================
    Please refer to paragraph Settings in the Enterprise Portal in note 1263876.
    Notes to be implemented
    =================
    Notes 1262480, 1252865, 1263470, 1260829

  • SRM 7.0 / ERP 6.04: Config. of Central Contract Management

    Hello,
    I want to configure the newly introduced integrated Procure-to-Pay Scenario Central Contract Management.
    I found SAP Note number 1268821 where all tasks are described in order to implement the previous scenario.
    For correct implementation, business function "Purchasing - SAP SRM Integration" (LOG_MM_P2PSE_1) activation is required in the ERP Systems.
    When I run SFW5 t-code in order to activate the previous business function, SAP system gives an alert message.
    What are the consequences of this business function activation ??
    Thank you
    Michele

    Hi Michele,
    I don't think there will be any consequences, we had certain warning messages aswell when we activated the business functions in ECC 6. Reading the warning messages we could conclude it wasn't any serious problem.
    Details on functionalities included in a business function can be viewed here: [http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04_sp/helpdata/en/42/fbded750e61febe10000000a422035/frameset.htm] -> Business Functions (SAP Enhancement Package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0) -> Business Functions in SAP ERP -> Logistics -> Materials Management -> Procurement - SRM Integration
    Kind regards,
    Tim

  • ERP release for Central Contract Management with SRM 7.0 EhP 1

    Hi all,
    i would like to have clarification with ERP and SRM release combinations regarding SRM 7.0 EhP1.
    Indeed, the "Software Component Matrix for SAP SRM 7.0 EHP1", for Operational Contract Management, tells 'EHP 5 for SAP ERP 6.0 required'.
    Moreover, in RKT dealing with SRM EhP1 delta overview, ERP 6.0 with EhP5 is mandatory for an upgrade to SRM7.01.
    Nevertheless, i would like to have confirmation regarding this point.
    We do not want to use PI to execute the Enterprise Services for CCM. So, we intend to switch BF SRM_WSRM_1 on.
    But on the ERP side (EhP5), the only BF dealing with Contract Management is LOG_MM_P2PSE_2 which description is about Service Procurement (and more exactly for item hierarchies).
    Does it mean we can use SRM 7.01 with ERP 6.0 EhP4 and without PI but only if we do not use Central Contracts with service hierarchies ?
    Thank you for your help.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

    Hi Laurent,
    Yes.
    When Central contract was designed in SRM 7.0 with ERP EhP4, it was designed with no service hierarchy. But in SRM 7.01 Central contral was enhanced to handle service hierarchy and it works with ERP EhP5. The problem is when we have SRM 7.01 and ERP EhP4. To handle this complication SRM 7.01 was designed to send flat service lines to EhP4 and lower release even though Central contract in SRM has service hierarchy. So while transfering to ERP EhP4 system in standard, all outlines are not consider for transfer and only service lines (Functional items) are transferred to ERP. To do so user needs to maintain the backend destination information of the connected backend system in table BBP_BACKEND_DEST via SM30 transaction with correct system type (for EhP4 system it will be ERP_4.0 and for EhP5 ERP_5.0). SAP Standard program checks this while XML generation for transfer and if system type is ERP_4.0 system it removes all outlines from temp table before generating the XML data. When it is done, ERP has only service lines in its XML and it does the manupulation to create the replication of central contract.
    Master Guide (Including Upgrade Information) - SAP SRM 7.01 states:
    "The use of SAP NetWeaver PI is optional but it is required for outbound XML-based messaging or for connecting non-SAP planning or execution systems."
    So service hierarchy is possible in SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 but only with PI. For other CCM functionalities, SRM 7.01 and ECC 6.04 without PI works fine.
    Best regards,
    Christian Zeuch

  • SRM addon with Contract Management

    SRM Gurus,
    We are in the verge of installing SAP SRM system. Our main focus will be on :
    1. SSP
    2. Contract Management
    3. Catalog Management
    Please clarify what are the pros and cons of using SRM as ADD-on or SRM as seperate instrance.
    If we can use contract management with SRM addon as a leading contract system without creating them in ECC6.0
    Kaushik

    The SRM AddOn is targeting on customers that are aiming on a simple procurement scenario, do not yet use mySAP SRM, are using only one Backend (ECC) system and aim to install SRM with a low TCO.
    The following scenarios are released within the SRM AddOn:
    Service Procurement (local deployment)
    Self-Service Procurement (classic deployment)
    SUS in connection with both scenarios mentioned above
    Catalog Content Management
    This also includes:
    operational usage of contracts (e.g. for the assignment of sources of supply)
    RFP - as far as known from the Temporary Labor scenario
    Please be aware that the following deployment and migration constraints apply:
    ERP 2005 with SRM as an add-on does not support any multiple-backend functions or hub deployment for procurement
    Upgrade or migration from an existing SRM system to ERP 2005 with SRM as an add-on is not supported.
    SAP does not offer migration paths from an SRM AddOn deployment to a deployment with a standalone SRM system.
    The extended classic deployment is not supported.
    The SRM as an add-on is only supported in the release combination ERP 6.0 and SRM 5.0. Other release combinations are not supported. Also future SRM releases will not run as an add-on on ERP 6.0
    for more info
    Read note 963000
    and thread
    SRM as an add-on to ERP 2005
    BR
    Dinesh

  • SRM one client Contract Management

    Dear Experts,
    Can we create contracts in SRM one client and distribute them to our ECC system.
    Because I seached on service marketplace and no where its mentioned that Contract mangement is possible in SRM one client.
    Sourcing is possible that I have checked the functionality. Please reply
    Thanks
    Ankit Jain

    Hi Ivy,
    Yes Correct nothing mentioned in the configuration guide or any other  document.
    But I checked System nodes no where I found that contract management is possible in SRM one client.
    Also Note 963000 doesn't say anything about it.
    Below link also says its not possible so I am confused even Roles doesn't have Contract Menu
    SRM 7.0 one client setup in comparison to SRM 7... | SCN
    Regards
    Ankit Jain

  • Using SRM for carrier and freight forwarder contract management

    Hi,
    Does it make sense to use SRM to manage contracts from carriers and freight forwarder? Has anybody done that? The documentation I read makes me think SRM is oriented towards manufacturers.
    Do you recommend any other solution for this situation?
    Any comments are highly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Prakash,
    SRM does provide the facility of contract management with the help of Purchase Contracts and Global Outline Agreements but it is used as part of the sourcing for materials and services. The materials or services have contracts against some given target value against which PO is released. The contract is based on a material number ( eithe material or a service) which will be used as a source of supply during the creation of the Shopping Cart. It might not really fit in the scenario of carrier and freight forwarders but still can be customized for this kind of use.
    The contract management functionalities in the R/3 space can also be looked on for this purpose.
    Reg
    Sachin

Maybe you are looking for