Hierarchy structure changes

Hi All,
I have one requirement at clent site where hierarchy structure changes i.e. parent child relation switches or changes from one level to another level. For example WBS element hierarchy stucture for project 101014 is:
101014--root
101014-1>101014-1-01>101014-1-01-02-->101014-1-01-02-01
after above hierarchy load to bw there are chances that hierarchy nodes change their positions.
i.e.above hierarchy node 101014-1-01 can be removed from  parent(101014-1) and assigned to 101014-2.
In Next load Hierarchy need to realign/restructure according to new hierarchy tree from ECC system. Right now we are BW 7.30. Thanks for you help and gurantee of points.
Regards,
Reddy

Hi Gaurav,
Thanks for quick response, we are running process chain on daily basis which will trigger full load from ECC to BW. I thought the same but when I look below error message I think we need to some how delete hierarchy data and reload with restructed or realigned data. Please find below error details and once again thanks for your help.
Node ID 00001564 has not been included as a sibling node or as a child node
Message no. RH207
Diagnosis
The node with the ID 00001564 and the node name 101014-1-02-03 is not used as a child node (field CHILDID) or a sibling node (field NEXTID) by any node in the hierarchy. The node is also not a root node because the ID of the parent node 00001565 (field PARENTID) is not equal to 0. The node is therefore not linked into the hierarchy. Therefore the node is not connected to the hierarchy.
Procedure
This message is displayed in addition to message RH 242. The node is the root node of a subtree that is not connected to the hierarchy. For further details, see the long text for message RH 242.
4 of a total of 13,846 nodes are not included in the hierarchy
Message no. RH242
Diagnosis
The root nodes are the starting point for moving through the hierarchy. The content of the fields NEXTID and CHILDID is used to move from the current node to its sibling and child nodes.
4 out of a total of 13,846 nodes cannot be reached by moving through the hierarchy in this way. These 4 nodes are not connected to the hierarchy.
System Response
The hierarchy is not consistent and therefore cannot be activated.
Procedure
The cause of the problem is usually incorrect links to sibling nodes (field NEXTID) or child nodes (field CHILDID). An incorrect value often means that an entire subtree (consisting of several nodes) is not included in the hierarchy.
To simplify the search for incorrect links, the system identifies the nodes (from all the not connected nodes) that are not used as sibling nodes or as child nodes. These nodes are usually root nodes of subtrees that are not connected to the hierarchy. You can find these nodes in the RH 207 messages that follow.
Try to localize the problem by using the RH207 messages for help. If the hierarchy is loaded from an SAP source system, you can check whether the extracted data is correct by executing transaction RSA3 in the source system. If necessary, check if the data is modified with a user exit. If the hierarchy is loaded from a file, check the contents of this file. The problem might also be due to an error in the transfer rules or in the transformation.
Thanks
Reddy

Similar Messages

  • Not to Supress Hierarchy Structure

    Hi,
    Based on the transaction data available in the cube my hierarchy structure gets changed. I want the structure to be static.
    Say for example I have account hierarchy, when I run it for different business area the account hierarchy structure changes as there is no data for that account and business area combination in the cube.
    Is there a way to make the hierarchy struture static eventhough if there is no data in the cube the account in the hierarchy should display with zero.
    Thanks,
    Anand
    Edited by: araj123 on Mar 5, 2012 8:06 PM
    Is there a solution without creating custom hierarchy in the BEx query designer, as I want the hierarchy created in SAP ECC to be leveraged.
    Edited by: araj123 on Mar 5, 2012 8:08 PM

    Hi Sven,
    you didnt understand my question properly. I know the disadvantage of having static structure in BEx query designer and thats why I asked is there any other solution.
    Also,I found the solution. You have the option in characterstics properties.
    Thanks,
    Anand.

  • Product :  Errors in attribute hierarchy structure SAP BCA   000164

    Hi All ,
    When ever i create /Display /Change Product in
    Financial Supply Chain Management --> In House Cash > Master Data>Product Definition--> Product --> Create /Change/Display
    system through below mentioned error .
    I tryed to resolve problem as per below mentioned program through se38 , but still getting same error
    Errors in attribute hierarchy structure SAP BCA   000164
    Message no. FIPR217
    System Response
    An error was found in the attribute hierarchy.
    In some cases, it is not possible to display the attribute hierarchy without having to correct the errors first.
    Procedure
    It is recommended that you run the FIPR_CLEAN_ATTRIBUTES (by using transaction SE38).  This report can recognize errors, and it attempts to correct them automatically.
    Caution: This report can change your table entries permanently.
    Once this report has run, you need to check the hierarchy structure, and make any necessary changes.
    Regards
    Prakash Sharma

    Hi,
    the realignment (KEND) does not change the line item tables (CE1***, CE2***), thats why they remain unchanged.
    The line items in CE1**** can not be changed. If you really want to have new line items (with the new prod. hierarchy) try in test-client if the use of report RKECADL1 and the new transfer to CO-PA for the deleted line items (KE4S, KE4SFI,...) can help you (SAPNET-note 69370 for details).
    CE2**** + SQL-error: As per now, I don't have an idea how to deal with that cases.
    best regards, Christian

  • Accommodate structure changes in Budget Application for each year

    every year our cost center structure changes to accomplish that we are creating New Budget Application every year . Cost center structure is divided in to Area then region and then csc. These Regions never stays under same Area they change it every year
    can anyone suggest out a way to do it in only one Budget Application instead of creating new Application every year ?
    How can we Accommodate structure changes in Budget Application for each year?
    thanks in advance for the suggestions

    Assuming the cost centers stay the same, and only the hierarchy of the dimension changes, it's really quite simple.
    Export the level 0 data, clear the database, update outline, import the level 0 export file, agg database. You should now have the new totals.
    All of this can be done in place without the export/import of data as well, but it is a good practice to export/clear db/import the data for defrag purposes.
    Some things to consider, if the organization will want to compare year over year company totals...
    1.     They need to create some governance around newly inactive cost centers, usually you create some sort of "Inactive" parent in the dimension and when they are no longer active they need to be reassigned to this "inactive" parent. This will ensure that at least the company total stays the same.
    2.     Following #1, they need to understand that the year over year totals will may only be accurate at Company total (including the Inactive rollup) and at cost center.
    Robert

  • Structure changes in the LBWE, where does the field pool come from MCVBUK

    Example:  Customising Cockpit, lbwe > 2lis_11_vascl > Maintain structure
    In lbwe the field 'pool' for MCVBUK does not have all the fields that I can see if I look at Structure          MCVBUK using se11 such as FKSTK, FKSAK.
    What does this depend on ?  Is it to do with the events ?
    Yet OSS Notes say to choose the fields from lbwe:
    structure changes in the LBWE SAP Note Number: 762951
    Note 576886 - Change to user-defined fields not extracted

    But enhancing extract structures, you don't get the delta capability on the  sepcific field (if you need it) - and there is no simple solution to this.
    I found these OSS notes:
    <b>Note 328255 - Not all fields provided in Customizing Cockpit</b>
    This behavior is wanted. As not all fields of the communication structures can be used in a practical way, some are hidden. Fields are hidden for the following reasons:
              o The field is not filled for this event.
              o The field is only used internally (for example the work center ID - instead, the respective work center name is available).
              o The field should not be used here for reasons of design. Principally, you should select key figures only from the most detailed communication structure (or from the one with the most detailed hierarchy) and only the characteristics from all communication structures.
    <b>Note 351214 - BW extraction SD: Restricted field selection</b>
    This note goes into more detail
    By the way, thanks for the replies, but the question was 'why ?' and I the OSS notes replied to this.
    The whole problem is to do with 'delta' enabling, and I've spent a day researching to find that there is no easy way to delta enable enhanced extract structure fields.

  • Report designer error for hierarchial structure on Columns

    Hello,
    I have a query with a structure in rows and another one in columns. I also have a 0COMPANY hierarchy Dimension within the Columns.
    When I insert the data provider into a report designer report, I receive the following error:
    "Query contains a hierarchial structure on Column(s)..."
    Has any one encountered this issue before? Is there a note or workaround available?
    Thank you.
    Sri Yalla

    Hi,
    the report designer need to have a fixed number of columns. If you have a Hierarchical Structure in the Columns, the number of columns can change. Therefore Report designer does not allow to use this DP in this drill down. You should place the Row structure to the columns and the hier-structure to the rows. then it should work.
    best regards,
    kai

  • Related to product hierarchy level change

    Hi all,
    we got a requirement to change the product hierarchy level from 3 to 5.can any body guide us for this.
    thanks in advance,
    karna

    hi,
    in std sap u can have only three levels,but u can go upto 6 levels.
    follow this steps
    1.append the std prod hierarchy structure with adition of zzprod4 and zzprod5
    2.new data element can be created 0r use prodh field data element and attach it to new fields as per above.
    3.in customiising v/76 y should reorganise 18 chars amongst 5 levels.
    by doing this in material master u can see in drop down list with 5 levels.
    hope it helps.
    reward if so  !!!!!!

  • 'Structure Changed' Error when running a query

    Hi,
    I created a query with 2 structures. One structure for the time periods and one with Key figures (Calc and Restricted).
    The query ran fine and subsequently I put this into a workbook which had other queries and made a workbook type report.
    I modified the structure with the key figures recently and when I run the query now a popup box appears saying "warning; structure changed" and lists down the query elements that I changed, and subsequently the query does not run (no data is displayed).
    But if I open the same query in design mode and do nothing and run the query again (with the same input parameters), it runs ok.
    Please advise on how I can sort this out.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Dominic

    Hi,
    If you want, you can remove the query with 'Remove Query' option in the BEx toolbar and then re-insert the query and then save the changes to the workbook. The next time, you refresh the workbook you won't get any such messages.
    Thanks

  • Org unit Hierarchy structure between two  Key date s

    Hello Friends,
    We have an issue with displaying HR Org unit hierarchy structure between two calendar months.
    The BI Report has a selection parameter to select Org unit hierarchy , Calendar month From and Calendar month To
    The BI Report is to display the no.of sick absence days for employees in a chosen Org unit hier.
    Employee A had a sick absence of 5 days in the month 04.2011 in the Org unit X . The same employee had a sick absence of 4 days in 05.2011.The Org unit X then delimit in 05.2011 , the Org unit X is no longer in Org structure from 05.2011.
    When we run the report for 04.2011 to 04.2011 , the employee A is showing absence under Correct Org unit ie X with correct Org structure .
    When we run the Report for 05.2011 to 05.2011 , the employee A is showing absence under hierarchy Org unit Not assigned which is OK .
    But the issue is when we run the Report from 04.2011 to 05.2011 , The employee A absence days 9 (5 +4 ) showing under Not assigned Org unit hierarchy structure which is the latest Org unit .
    When I deactivate the Org unit hierarchy and choose tech name of Org unit , It is showing correct Org unit key
    But The user would like to see 5 days under org unit X and 4 days under Not assigned with Correct Org unit hier structure when we run the Report from 04.2011 to 05..2011 .
    We have a user Exit variable for the Key date in the Bex Report which seems to be taking only one date at any time .
    Is there any way to get the correct figures under Org unit hier structure where employee had absence in when we put range of calendar months on a selection screen ?
    Any advice appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Yes, we can display the same by using time dependent hierachy's i.e. your org is converted to time dependent so that respective employee shows with respective of time.
    Regards
    Jagadeesh.M

  • Org unit Hierarchy structure  at Key date

    Hello Friends,
    We have an issue with  displaying HR Org unit hierarchy structure  between two calendar months.
    The BI Report has a selection parameter to select Org unit hierarchy , Calendar month From  and Calendar month To
    The BI Report is  to display the no.of sick absence days for employees in a chosen Org unit hier.
    Employee  A had a sick absence of 5 days  in  the month 04.2011  in the Org unit X .  The same employee had a sick absence of 4 days in 05.2011.The Org unit X then delimit in 05.2011 , the Org unit X is no longer in Org structure from 05.2011.
    When we run the report for 04.2011  to 04.2011 , the employee A is showing  absence   under Correct Org unit ie X with correct Org structure .
    When  we run the Report for 05.2011 to 05.2011 , the employee A is showing absence under  hierarchy Org unit Not assigned which is OK .
    But the issue is when we run the Report from 04.2011 to 05.2011 , The employee A absence days 9 (5 +4 ) showing under Not assigned Org unit hierarchy structure which is  the latest Org unit .
    When I deactivate the Org unit hierarchy  and choose tech name of Org unit , It is showing correct Org unit key
    But The user would like to see 5 days under org unit X  and 4 days under Not assigned with  Correct Org unit hier structure  when we run the Report from 04.2011 to 05..2011  .
    We have a user Exit variable  for  the Key date  in the Bex Report  which  seems to be taking only one date at any time .
    Is  there any way to get the correct figures under Org unit hier structure where  employee had absence in when we put range of calendar months on a selection screen ?
    Any advice appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    You can try adding two more attributes to Org Unit as "Calender month from" and "Calender month to".
    In these attributes maintain the validity period for the corresponding master data.
    For example, in your case you can maintain the master data as:
    Employee | Org Unit | Calender month from |Calender month to | sick absence
    A | X | 4.2011| 4.2011 | 5 days
    A |    | 5.2011 | 05.2011 | 4 days
    And in report use variables for Calender month from" and "Calender month to".
    Hence, when user executes the report with selection as:
    Calender month from" = 04.2011
    "Calender month to"    =  05.2011
    The data will be read from master data based on these selections along with key date and report will show output as expected.
    Employee | Org Unit | Calender month from |Calender month to | sick absence
    A | X | 4.2011| 4.2011 | 5 days
    A |    | 5.2011 | 05.2011 | 4 days
    Hope this works for you.
    Regards,
    Geetanjali

  • MOPatch bpmig.sh Structural Changes in SAP Bundle Patches

    Structural Changes in SAP Bundle Patches New!
    As of June 2014, there is a change in the internal structure of the SAP Bundle Patches (SBPs) for Oracle. While this has many benefits, applying the new SBP for the first time requires special handling. For more information, see the hot news SAP Note 2011199.
    When looking at note 2011199 I found due to the changed structure and to identify stand alone patches it is recommended to run the bpmig.sh script.
    To avoid these problems or to detect them before actually installing this SBP, you must run the bundle patch migration script bpmig which is delivered with MOPatch 2.1.16 and later.
    The script comes up with an error message:
    Cannot determine SBP version from "SAP Bundle Patch 11.2.0.3.2 - 201205".
    opatch / mopatch semselfs seems to function properly...
    Any clues?

    Hi,
    Please check the following SAP Note 2032109 - Executing bpmig.sh shows "Cannot determine installed SBP"
    Thanks.
    http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2032109

  • How to use File Adapter with hierarchial Structure?

    Hi,
    How to use File Adapter with hierarchial Structure like..
    Data:
    --Header Details:
    Line Item Details:
    Data
    Bcoz I am getting a Flatfile in a hierarchial way as shown below.
    Header Details :1
    Line Item a
    Line Item b
    Header Details :2
    Line Item c
    Line Item d
    Kishore

    Hey Kishore,
    In order to create a structure you need to use the file with convertion mode on the sending communication channel of the file adapter.
    check the link for the needed configuration paramters.
    If the structure is more complexed you can use the Contetnt master(CM) from itemfield which allows to ceate XML file from complex flat files and more.
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/0d/5ab43b274a960de10000000a114084/frameset.htm">File sender adapter</a>
    If you have any question i'll be more than happy to assist.
    Nimrod Gisis

  • How to include the not assigned nodes in Hierarchy structure

    Hi Experts,
    I am running a report which has got Hierarchy variable type. After execution of the query some of the nodes appear always under "not assigned".
    Please let me know is it possible to include these not assigned node under hierarchy structure.If so how to do that?
    Regards
    Kumar

    Hi Subbiah.
    You can also supress the "not assigned" nodes in the hierarchy maintanence by choosing: Hierarchy attributes -> Supress unassigned nodes.
    Hope it helps.
    BR
    Stefan

  • How to create Formulas in the hierarchy structure

    Hi,
    Is it possible to create formula with in the hierarchy structure, so that the both hierarchy drill down and the created formulas can be displayed at the query output. Please give the valued suggestions.
    Thanks
    VEERU.

    Hello
    You have in this case to create a structure and select the node concerned in your hierarchy.
    Then create a new formula based on your previous selection for example.
    Rgds

  • Roles for disabeling structure changes in excel

    Hello togehter,
    I have got a excel sheet which I can open by the "Analyzer-AddIn."
    If the users have to change some data, there is an embedded save-button.
    But if they use the normal excel save button, it could be that the excell will be destroyed.
    And now my question,
    is it possible to disable structure changes by clicking the normal save button in an excel sheet via (creating) SAP-Roles? Or is it only possible by chaning VB-Code?
    Thanks in advance!
    Greetings,
    Peter

    Hi Peter,
    if you want to disable the standard "save" excel button you should use some custom VB code. Afterwards, you can include this VB code in your reports using the workbook functionality.
    Regards,
    Theodoros

Maybe you are looking for