Hierarchy total

Hi all,
I have set a measure's logical level to a Hierarchy total as it has no detailed granularity of such hierarchy.
e.g. budget plan for product total
Hence, whatever user drill from product total to details, it will show the same number.
Now, I would like to show budget plan=0 or empty when user filter on lower level, product category,product name....
I have the idea to use some alias table for logical source table for every detailed level
Any other easier way to achieve it?
Thanks
BCHK

Hi,
Yes, I am using Account Number in my Query.
The Account Number is placed in the Rows, with Hierarchy option activated.
In the Accoutn Number characteristic property, the Display of Results ->Suppress Results Rows is "Never".
what do you mean by "and display resultsd just before object to hierarchy (I guess account number)."?
Please help.

Similar Messages

  • Hierarchy Totals Below

    In the query designer I have built a query that contains on the rows Cost Centre, Employees and GL Codes. I have activated a Presenation Hierarchy e.g. on the rows section clicked on display as hierarchy. However when I run the query the totals are above rather than below the nodes. I have set the hierarchy on the infobject to below. I've set it on the query to display below but still it dispalys above. Any ideas?

    Hi Joel,
    There is no way to display the total at the bottom for a hierarchy which is having "Position of Lower-Level nodes" = Below in the Query Designer. If you want the total at bottom reverse the hierarchy select "Position of Lower-Level nodes" = above and it will show the results at bottom but your hierarchy will be displayed bottom to top direction.
    If you will select the Query to show resout below, it is only applicable for Non Hierarchy data.
    Regards,
    Kams

  • Sap FC Account hierarchy total calculation

    Hi,
    I'm working with the SAP RDS for Solvency II.
    Into a category scenario you can manage a Chart of accounts as a subset of the account dimension.
    I have also a predefined hierarchy into Account dimension.
    I noticed that for some scenarios (eg Balance sheet), the values in the children account are added up into the parent account and the last one is calculated (I can't write on it but I don't see particular formula in Formulas tab of the scenario).
    Instead for other scenarios (eg Capital Requirement) the values in the children account aren't carried into the parent account.
    Where can I set this behaviour?
    Thanks,
    Matteo

    Thanks Eli,
    I am not looking at the tables where I can find the Hierarchy defined in the Financial Statement Versions but I am looking at the table which has consolidated GL Account values like Total Revenue, Total Expenses etc..
    As per my understanding, the totals are calculated runtime by the SAP program as per the hierarchy defined in the Financial Statement version and it is not stored in any GL account balances.
    Please provide me more inputs and correct me if my understanding is not correct.
    Regards,
    Raghu

  • Hierarchy totals in percentage variance

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement to show the percentage variance at Hierarchy node level. For ex:
    _______________________________actuals__budgt____variance
    1000Costlemnet group______________100_____200______50
    ______1010300 payrelated cost (node)_50_____100______50
    ______100202 Pay(cost element______ 25______50______50
    ______100203 staff related costelem___25______50______50
    At present i get the percentage variance at cost element level not at hierarchy node level.
    Any ideas pelase share.
    Thanks,
    RRR
    Edited by: Rammi on Feb 17, 2010 7:09 PM

    Hi,
    check if you have definied to your CKF the:
    Calculate result as = nothing definied
    calculate single value as = nothing definied
    Formula colision = nothing definied
    and in your hierarchy you shoul have Nomalize to = no normalization
    hope it helps

  • How set up visualization attributes for Hierarchy nodes?

    I have a hierarchy for 0ACCOUNT and i see in the report the hierarchy totally expanded but in the Query Designer i can
    set the values for 0ACCOUNT to show the ID only for every account but the hierarchy have more nodes (text nodes in addition to accounts) i need that ONLY TEXT NODES show the Description of Text Nodes instead of Technical Node ID........in query designer you could set for accounts that show Text, ID or both but in for text nodes there´s no way to do this.......in Query execution you could set up this with extended menu....and you could set up that only shows Text for Hierechy nodes.....I hope somebody could help me with this...
    Regards

    You are right, the only way to do that is save the query as workbook, then setup the description, text, etc in the workbook , and finally save the workbook in the way you want to view.
    Regards

  • Underline a Hierarchy after a specific level in crystal reports

    hello,
    i have a requirement to create a report in crystal from a BEx query with a hierarchy.
    1) in the report, they want to show the first 3 levels of the hierarchy (total of 4 levels) on the report at startup, and after every 3rd level, they want a underline from one side of the report to the other.
    2) the third level in the hierarchy is sorted in a specific way in that, the total field is last. i have the group sorted in the original hierarchical way, but yet it is still in alphabetical order.
    andy thoughts on these two issues?
    thx in advance.
    erik

    If I understand, Either
    Draw a line across the bottem of the 3rd group footer
    or
    split the section for the 3rd group footer, make the last section narrow with a different backgroud color

  • Hierarchy leaf not shown while data exists

    Hi experts,
    We have the following issue regarding the (in)visibility of hierarchy leafs:
    We know that transactional data exists for a particular item in the hierarchy (total value is zero). This item is not shown by default in the report output (while zero suppression has been turned off). There are a few ways to make the item visible, e.g:
         1. Deactivate the hierarchical display
         2. Filter on the item
         3. Filter on another characteristic value for which the transaction data doesn't add up to zero.
         4. .........
    However, we would like to show the item in any case, so even when the underlying transactional data sums up to zero.
    Has anyone faced a similar problem before? Any idea how to solve the issue?
    If necessary, I can send some screenshots with detailed information by email.
    Thanks in advance !
    Kind regards,
    Rene

    Hi,
    We had a similiar issue in the Cost Element Hierarchy & got resolution.
    I followed the below method an extract from SDN Forum reply.
    You need to make the InfoObject an InfoProvider. Then you create a multiprovider with your InfoCube and the InfoObject. When you create a query, insert a new column that contains the key figure 0ROWCOUNT and a restriction on 0INFOPROV to your InfoObject.
    When you right click on 0INFOPROV you now have the option to select Constant Selection. When you've turned it on you do a right click again and you're able to activate "Display non-posted values."
    Finally hide the new column and execute the query.
    Also we found out that for the nodes that were not appearing , the master data was incomplete. there was no source system assignment to those, we updated the field manually & with the above method the query worked.
    Regards
    Lalan

  • Sort items in hierarchy

    Oracle BI 11g
    Hi!
    I have time-hierarchy: Total - Year - Month - Week - Date
    In each level of hierarchy i have 2 keys - ID and Name (for example, year_id, year_name, month_id, month_name, etc.)
    IDs are the primary keys for each level and Names are columns for display (for example, month_name = Jan, Feb, March....)
    But when I add hierarchy in Analyis, I see that months are sorted in alphabetic order - April, December, February, January etc. But I want to order them by MonthID - Jan, Feb, March, .... How can I do this?

    Hi,
    In BMM layer click on month column under time dim table and select sort order column as month number so that months get sorted.
    Regards,
    Srikanth

  • Multiple Hierarchies in one dimension - comments?

    multiple hierarchies
    Hi Experts,
    I'd like your comments on my implementation of multiple hierarchies in one dimension.- especially if this can be done in a way that:
    a) still enables users to choose the hierarchy in a dashboard prompt
    b) reduces maintenance to a minimum
    The dimension groups ages into several different groups like the example below:
    Hierarchy1 Hierarchy2
    Age......Groups........Groups.....
    0........0-2...........0-5
    1........0-2...........0-5
    2........0-2...........0-5
    3........3-5...........0-5
    4........3-5...........0-5
    75.......70-75.........70-80
    76.......76-80.........70-80
    Right now I've implemented this by defining one dimension having one hierarchy:
    Total
    ....Hierarchy
    .......Group
    .........Age
    The underlying logical table is based on several logical table sources (LTS) - one for each hierarchy as shown in the first example(Hierarchy1, Hierarchy2).Every LTS has a fragmentation definition filtering on values on 'hierarchy-level'.
    Columns in the logical table (and of course in the underlying LTS) are:
    Column               mapped to hierarchy-level
    - Hierarchy          Hierarchy               
    - Hierarchy_id          Hierarchy
    - Group          Group
    - Group-id          Group
    - Age               Age
    Advantages:
    A answers / dashboard user can select one or more hierarchies by using a dashboard prompt.
    Adding a new hierarchy (a new grouping) doesn't need changes in the dimension itself
    Disadvantages:
    A new grouping needs manual steps to implement
    - a new physical table
    - a new LTS attached to the logical table (including the fragmentation content)
    Thanks for your time and comments
    Regards
    Andy

    multiple hierarchies
    Hi Experts,
    I'd like your comments on my implementation of multiple hierarchies in one dimension.- especially if this can be done in a way that:
    a) still enables users to choose the hierarchy in a dashboard prompt
    b) reduces maintenance to a minimum
    The dimension groups ages into several different groups like the example below:
    Hierarchy1 Hierarchy2
    Age......Groups........Groups.....
    0........0-2...........0-5
    1........0-2...........0-5
    2........0-2...........0-5
    3........3-5...........0-5
    4........3-5...........0-5
    75.......70-75.........70-80
    76.......76-80.........70-80
    Right now I've implemented this by defining one dimension having one hierarchy:
    Total
    ....Hierarchy
    .......Group
    .........Age
    The underlying logical table is based on several logical table sources (LTS) - one for each hierarchy as shown in the first example(Hierarchy1, Hierarchy2).Every LTS has a fragmentation definition filtering on values on 'hierarchy-level'.
    Columns in the logical table (and of course in the underlying LTS) are:
    Column               mapped to hierarchy-level
    - Hierarchy          Hierarchy               
    - Hierarchy_id          Hierarchy
    - Group          Group
    - Group-id          Group
    - Age               Age
    Advantages:
    A answers / dashboard user can select one or more hierarchies by using a dashboard prompt.
    Adding a new hierarchy (a new grouping) doesn't need changes in the dimension itself
    Disadvantages:
    A new grouping needs manual steps to implement
    - a new physical table
    - a new LTS attached to the logical table (including the fragmentation content)
    Thanks for your time and comments
    Regards
    Andy

  • OBIEE 11.1.1.6 different layer hierarchies

    Hi experts,
    I want to know whether the following layout is implemented. How to create different layer hierarchy in BMM in OBIEE 11.1.1.6?
    If it does work , I want to drag this hierarchy into presentation. Please help me as soon as possible. Thanks.
    For example:
    Presentation Hierarchy
    Total
    ---Region
    -----District
    ---------Brand
    -------------Product Type
    -----------------Product Detail

    Hi SPowell42,
    I am using OBIEE 11.1.1.6 to design and develop anything.
    I have searched some related help information in RPD, and found 'modeling dimensions with multiple hierarchies in the presentation layer ' title which introduced some simple hierarchy information,such as
    Country
    --Region
    -----City
    -------Supplies
    -------------Product
    -------------------Product detail.
    I am not sure whether it can do different layer hieiarchy in hieiarchy persenation. Maybe the sample column data stored in one table, however, it is my assumption.

  • Using AGO function in calculated fields in Analysis

    Oracle BI 11g.
    Hi!
    I have time-hierarchy and try to use function Ago in calculated fields. I created Analysis and add columns Year, Revenue, Revenue (1 year ago). In formula of column "Revenue (1 year ago)" I wrote:
    AGO("Sales"."Revenue", "H Calendar"."Year", 1)
    "H Calendar"."Year" - is level in my time Hierarchy "H Calendar".
    But when I clicked [OK], I got error: [nQSError: 27037] Unresolved level: "H Calendar"."Year".(HY000)
    What I do wrong?

    Hi,
    I think it's a bug, try this.
    If Analysis you have a time folder with this object dimension:
    Time Hierarchy
    Total Time
    Year
    Quarter
    Month
    Week
    Day
    And a measures 1- Revenue try to calculate the criteria like this (write in the level the formula "Time"."Time Hierarchy".Year)
    For example:
    AGO("Base Facts"."1- Revenue", "Time"."Time Hierarchy".Year,1)
    If you have the sample sales of the 11g installed try this on A - Sample Sales
    SELECT s_0, s_1, s_2 FROM (
    SELECT
    0 s_0,
    "A - Sample Sales"."Time"."T05 Per Name Year" s_1,
    AGO("A - Sample Sales"."Base Facts"."1- Revenue","Time"."Time Hierarchy"."Year",1) s_2
    FROM "A - Sample Sales"
    ) djm ORDER BY 1, 2 ASC NULLS LAST
    For me it works.
    Regards,
    Gianluca

  • [HELP] AGO function return wrong result

    Hi, i try to implement ago function in OBIEE, but the result is not as expected. Please help me to configure Time Dimension to get this work.
    My case:
    - I have a time dimension with this configuration:
    [http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii176/necrombi/NEO/1-1.png]
    Time Hierarchy: Total > Year > Quarter > Month > Day
    Year:
    Primary key: Calendar_year_cal_year_code
    Chronological key: Does not define
    Quarter:
    Primary key: Calendar_quarter_description
    Chronological key: Does not define
    Month:
    Primary key: Calendar_month_description
    Chronological key: Calendar_month_description
    Day:
    Primary key: Dimension_key
    Chronological key: Day_day_code
    My ago function: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", 1)
    I do not understand why i get this wrong results:
    [http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii176/necrombi/NEO/2.png]
    Does anyone know how to solve this?
    Edited by: 864451 on Jun 8, 2011 5:11 AM

    Hi, thanks for your reply.
    I implemented Time dimension with your recommend, and have time dimension like this:
    Time Hierarchy: Total > Year > Quarter > Month > Day
    Year:
    Primary key: Calendar_year_start_date
    Chronological key: Calendar_year_start_date
    Quarter:
    Primary key: Calendar_quarter_start_date
    Chronological key: Calendar_quarter_start_date
    Month:
    Primary key: Calendar_month_start_date
    Chronological key: Calendar_month_start_date
    Day:
    Primary key: Day
    Chronological key: Dimension_key
    And Ago function works fine with month level: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", n)
    But return sum result of 12 month with: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."year", 1)
    In my case, i just use AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", 12) to get year ago value. But i still don't understand clearly about OBIEE Time Serries functions.
    Thanks,
    Dung Nguyen

  • Obiee report across non additive fact tables

    I have two fact tables (f1,f2) joined two conformed dimensions d1,d2
    d1,d2 have simple hierarchy total and detail levels
    f1 --->d1
    f1---->d2
    f2---->d1
    f2---->d2
    facts tabel layout
    f1 -- c1&c2 are(additive measures)c3&c4 are(non additive measures)
    f2----col1&col2 are (additive measures)col3&col4(non additive measures)
    I have tried to construct a report with c1,c2,col1,col2 and it works fine
    when i try to do c1,c2,c3,c4,col1,col4 second fact table cols are null.
    Can someone please guide how to resolve this issue.

    there is a rule saying When you are combining multiple fact tables(stars) in a single report, the measures should be aggregated. This is like best practice.
    So in your scenario, you have to create 2 logical dimensions from the fact tables.
    Create logical dimensions F1D with source physical F1 and add only non aggregated measure(c3,c4), Create a hierarchy with total and detail level.
    Create logical dimensions F2D with source physical F2 and add only non aggregated measure(col3,col4), Create a hierarchy with total and detail level.
    then for fact table f1 , set level F1d - Detail, F2d - total.
    then for fact table f2 , set level F1d - total, F2d - detail.
    Update your presentation layer. Make sure these non aggregated columns coming from F1d,F2d instead of logical fact tables.
    check for consistency.,Now save,reload/restart server. Check your reports, thats it.
    thanks
    Madan Thota

  • How can I build a ragged Entity dimension with ERPi

    All,
    I am trying to build an Entity dimension for Planning with ERP Integrator v11.1.2.1, the source is EBS 12.
    In the source system I am building from there is a single parent entity with six child entities, there are then 8 hierarchies of cost centres with no common parent, these cost centre groups define different business areas within only one of the entities, the cost centres for the remaining entities have not yet been defined.
    In the ERP Setup I have specified that the Entity dimension should be built from the Entity and Cost Centre segments and I have created metadata mappings for each parent entity and cost centre ancestor pair (eight in all), the Enitiy segment is traversed first followed by the Cost Centre; all are defined as Base Hierarchies. Each pair has a separate hiearchy name, I tried to define only one of these as a base hierarchy and reuse the name for each pair but this resulted in an error:
    Run Time Error: The hierarchy 'Total Entity' cannot share the parent member 'Total Entity' with the hierarchy 'Total Entity'
    At the moment I get a hierarchy where all cost centres are associated with all child entities.
    Can anyone advise what needs to be done to achieve the following:
    - Get the dimension to build with the cost centres as children of the entities to which they relate.
    - Build the entity dimenion beneath a single common parent e.g. 'Total Entity' rather than eight separate parents (one for each entity/cost centre mapping).
    Thanks

    Gavin,
    i have the same issue, can you please share, how you were able to solve this.

  • Exclusion of members..

    In the EPM 10NW report, I need to exclude certain entity members from the display.
    In the 'report editor' I am using the 'Exclude members' option in this regard.
    These members are excluded from the report display, but still showing up in the hierarchy total in the display.
    How to make sure that it is not showing up in hierarchy total.
    Appreciate inputs.

    Show only base members and them in member selector in the edit report use the feature "Member Sorting and Grouping". Check the option After/Before Group.
    Refer the image below.
    Cheers

Maybe you are looking for