High CPU load after firefox 18.0 update, causing periodical hang

Hi, I am basically getting crazy here after the update to firefox 18.0 yesterday.
Firefox periodically causes very high CPU load, which makes it impossible to use.
http://img805.imageshack.us/img805/702/firefox18.png
The problem does not occur immediately after restart, but you can already see the spikes of CPU load in the taskmanager with a peak of ~4%. After a couple of minutes this will go up to almost 50% utilizing a whole core and causing the hangs.

The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
To Reset Firefox do the following:
#Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
#Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
#Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
#Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

Similar Messages

  • Hwmond high cpu load after 10.6.8 update

    hwmond is causing up to 70% cpu load after every reboot on several xserves i manage caused by the update to 10.6.8. anybody else having this problem? it can be solved by hwmond -s5 to set the hwmond interval to 5 seconds but this command is not processed properly, is causing an error message "IOConnectMethodScalarIScalra0 call return err = 0xE00002BC" and has to be exited with cmd+c. Also, the com.apple.hwmond.plist in LaunchDaemons is empty.

    In my case:
    I installed 10.6.8 via the Combo Update, was running 10.6.7 previous to this.
    /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist still exists and is not empty
    /etc/hwmond.SMART still exists and is not empty
    /etc/hwmond.conf didn't exist, so from Terminal.app I simply issued "sudo touch /etc/hwmond.conf"
    I tried:
    In Terminal.app, ran:sudo launchctl unload /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    Then, backed up /usr/sbin/hwmond and /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    From a Mac Pro running 10.6.7 Server, copied both the binary and the plist to the same spots on the Xserve, then, in Terminal.app, ran:sudo launchctl load /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    That didn't change a thing. hwmond still spiked.
    Put everything back the way it was.
    And:
    In Terminal.app, ran:sudo launchctl unload /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    Backed up /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    Made another copy to the Desktop
    Edited this copy and added a string in ProgramArguments with a value of "-S255", but this still caused hwmond to spike after putting this copy back in LaunchDaemons, repairing permissions, and loading the plist via launchctl again. Any valid value still caused it to spike. However my Xserve now reboots if I set the value to an invalid value, like "-s256". Then again this also caused com.apple.hwmond and com.apple.launchd to create entries in the system log complaining about the value with hwmond attempting to relaunch itself every 10 seconds:
    6/24/11 2:37:10 PM com.apple.hwmond[2697] hwmond: n should be 1 to 255 seconds
    6/24/11 2:37:10 PM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.hwmond[2697]) Exited with exit code: 1
    6/24/11 2:37:10 PM          com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.hwmond) Throttling respawn: Will start in 10 seconds
    OP, Armin, did something similar, but I think he tried doing it directly in Terminal, not using launchctl / launchd, which caused the error he mentioned.
    Finally, added a "Disabled" item, with a boolean value of YES to the plist, recopied it, repaired permissions again (launchctl will complain and won't load the plist if you don't). This way hwmond is disabled, I can reboot my Xserve, and wait until Apple figures this out.
    Full com.apple.hwmond.plist on my Xserve looks like this now:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
    <plist version="1.0">
    <dict>
              <key>Label</key>
              <string>com.apple.hwmond</string>
              <key>OnDemand</key>
              <false/>
              <key>Program</key>
              <string>/usr/sbin/hwmond</string>
              <key>ProgramArguments</key>
              <array>
                        <string>hwmond</string>
                        <string>-s255</string>
              </array>
              <key>ServiceIPC</key>
              <false/>
              <key>Disabled</key>
              <true/>
    </dict>
    </plist>
    Edit: I too have filed a bug report with a link to this thread included.
    Second Edit: Server Monitor.app still works after disabling hwmond via the plist even after a reboot.
    Third Edit: Sorry, keep remembering things, a modified /usr/sbin/hwmond was included the 10.6.8 Server Combo Update package, but not the Delta. Not sure if this matters. How has everyone updated to 10.6.8 so far? Like I mentioned, I used the Combo.

  • Eclipse causes high cpu load after firefox update

    Hi,
    I have a strange problem after the latest firefox (and xulrunner) update (3.0.5.1 and 1.9.0.5-1). When I open firefox and afterwards eclipse, eclipse uses about 60% of the cpu after a short while; even if I don't do anything at all (and nothing gets compiled) in eclipse. But when I open firefox and eclipse in the reverse order, eclipse behaves normally again (like before the update).
    After a downgrade to xulrunner-1.9.0.4-1 and firefox-3.0.4-1 the execution order of both programms is irrelevant again.
    I assume this has something to do with java or maybe xulrunner?
    Thanks, for any help.
    Last edited by otti (2008-12-25 17:11:34)

    The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
    Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
    To Reset Firefox do the following:
    #Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
    #Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
    #Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
    #Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
    Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
    Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

  • VI causes high CPU load after several days of running

    Hello,
    I have a strange problem. I have craeted a test bench control VI and it runs on five PCs, controling five test benches. All PCs have almost the same hardware, same motherboard, same CPU, etc.
    Normaly the CPU load is around 50% when I run the VI, but at one PC the CPU load climbs up to 85% after several days (maybe one week) of continuous running and the PC is almost tied up - the VI execution becomes very slow (10 times slower) and the mouse only moves very slowly.
    First I thought that the PC has a problem but the problem dissapears as soon as I stop and restart the VI!
    I don't even have to terminate LabVIEW - only my VI and then everything is okay again.
    The problem does not seem to occur at the other four PCs, but I can not tell for sure.
    The task manager says only LabVIEW causes the CPU load - swap file utilisation is little.
    Is there a way to analyze what causes the high CPU load?
    I Use LabVIEW 7.1 professional
    Operating System: Win XP (SP 2 or 3 I don't remember)
    P.S. I have no loops without wait-functions.
    Greetings Johannes
    Using LabVIEW 7.1 and 2009 recently
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Do all PCs have the same amount of RAM?
    What is the memory use over time as seen by the windows taks manager. Does it increase gradually?
    An increase in resource usage if often cause by sloppy programming.
    Do you grow arrays forever or constantly resize arrays in memory? (built array, insert into array, delete from array)
    Do you often create new references and never close them?
    What does the program actually do? In my opinion, a constant 50% CPU load seems too high for my taste. It means it would not even be able to keep up on slightly older hardware.
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • SeqEdit.exe goes to high cpu load after execution

    Hello,
    I am making a test sequence (in TestStand 2010), which uses a DLL to communicate (through TCP sockets) with a JAVA program.
    The execution of tests goes perfectly, with CPU load varying from approximatly 7% to 25%.
    However, after a short period of time (couple of seconds) when the tests are finished, the CPU load of SeqEdit.exe rises to 50%, and stays at that level..
    (Since I have a dual core PC, this means it confiscates an entire core).
    When I start another test, or close TestStand, the high level goes away.
    In the Cleanup section of the main sequence, I do (just to be sure) an extra "Unload all modules".
    I already tried reinstalling TestStand, that didn't fix the issues.
    Anyone any clue?
    Jeroen

    Hi,
    My guess is it's got soemthing to do with your code module. Have you tried one of the supplied examples, I believe there is a JAVA example, and do you see the same problems.
    Regards
    Ray Farmer

  • High CPU load after resuming from sleep mode

    When my laptop resumes from sleep mode, LabVIEW 2012 starts to generate a very high and always constant CPU load (25%) without any VI running. I need to close all front panels to get back to the usual <1% CPU load level.
    This behaviour spoils my carbon footprint and frequently eats up my battery. Any ideas what is causing this ?
    Thank you,
    Dirk

    I'm guessing your issue may be related to this:
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Why-is-using-100-of-a-CPU-1-out-of-8-when-it-does-nothing/m-p/242745...
    Dirk@LV wrote:
    This behaviour spoils my carbon footprint and frequently eats up my battery.
    Thank you,
    Dirk
    Sorry about your carbon footprint, NI has a lot to answer!
    Beginner? Try LabVIEW Basics
    Sharing bits of code? Try Snippets or LAVA Code Capture Tool
    Have you tried Quick Drop?, Visit QD Community.

  • High CPU load after waking with Thunderbolt Display connected

    I have a Mid-2013 MacBook Air 13" with Apple Thunderbolt Display connected. I use this setup mostly in a clamshell mode. Recently I've updated to OS X Mavericks. After that I've noticed that one of the cores is occupied by kernel_task to 100% after waking up from sleep. I've managed to isolate that to Apple Thunderbolt Display connected, without display there is a short CPU spike, but it comes down to normal levels in a couple of seconds.
    I've tried resetting SMC to no success. MacBook doesn't enter Safe Mode either (progress bar goes up to approx. 30% and it goes to reboot). Probably it's because of the Thunderbolt Display, I'm not really sure.
    That's not really a problem as this load doen't seem to impact CPU temp (fans are not spinning faster) and more of a activity monitor display glitch (?).
    Does anyone here encounter this?

    Hey Max,
    I also have one CPU core on my Air'13 to run 100% after a wake-up for about 1 minute (kernel_task).
    It is annoyingly like this after I upgraded to Maverics. Notice, I don't have a Thunderbolt monitor, just a laptop, no periphery.

  • High CPU load and com.apple.ImageCaptureExtension2 crash after upgrade

    After upgrading my Macbook Air from Lion to Mountain Lion, the system has a very high cpu load, and the crash reporter is the process that causes thee high load. In the error log I see this entry several times per second:
    17.08.12 12:58:46,011 ReportCrash[5998]: com.apple.message.domain: com.apple.crashreporter.writereport.crash
    com.apple.message.signature: Image Capture Extension
    com.apple.message.signature2: com.apple.ImageCaptureExtension2 ||| 8.0 (8.0)
    com.apple.message.signature3: 03A96CBDA3C85A114383537BFC5C8999
    com.apple.message.result: NO
    com.apple.message.summarize: YES
    I investigated a bit more and recovered, that it has something to do with the printer drivers. When I remove all printers from setting, everything is fine. As soon as I add a printer (Brother MFC 9440CN printer/scanner, printer driver provided by Mountan Lion), the crash reporter starts it's work and the error log is full of those entries.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks in advance,
    Marcus

    I did more exploration and found the cause of this, but I don't know how to fix it:
    I removed all Brother and Lexmark printer drivers and rebooted (and also tested with a virtual machine using 10.8.0 as guest os that never had any printer installed). As soon as I enter the printer settings and press the "+", the crashes begin, so it looked like the bonjour one of the printers announcing themselves via Bonjour were causing this.
    When watching a picture in the preview app the same happend. We have two multi function printers in our network, the already mentioned brother printer and a Lexmark X204N. Switching off the Lexmark (which wasn't installed on my Mac) solved the problem. Switching off the printer is no solution in our office (it's our fax device and main printer), but switching off mDNS on the Lexmark also solved it. But this can only be a workaround.
    Is this a known problem with Lexmark devices and Mountain Lion (it works fine with machines using Lion)? Are there any fixes known? It's just the Lexmark device announing itself via Bonjour that causes trouble, even if the driver is not installed.

  • Osx 10.9 Mail & Safari High cpu load

    Hello,
    A few weeks ago I updated to OSX 10.9. After working a few days with it, I run into several high CPU load issues.
    2 processes: mail-webmateriaal and safari-webmateriaal (dutch).
    Now I use Chrome instead of Safari which solves 50% of my problem, but it is not so easy to change to another mail-client...
    Does anyone have a clue about the possible cause, but even more important, a solution?
    Best regards,
    Johan

    jvdstoel,
    Ditto.  I have the exact same OS 10.9 issue on a Late 2008 iMac with a 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo that is maxed out at 4 GB RAM (seemed like a lot of RAM at the time). 
    Mail, Safari, and Firefox--but not Chrome--whether running any 1, 2, or all 3 programs together keeps the CPU running hard at and often above 100%.  This occurs even when the programs a sitting idle from the user's perspective.  Disabling all extensions on Safari and Firefox did not help.  Nor did running Onyx to clear all catches system wide.
    Calling on anyone with a virtual PhD in Maverics (or real Apple OS 10.9 street-smarts) for suggestions. 
    Best,
    Pete

  • High CPU load

    We use vSphere 5.5 with latest updates, Web Client and the VMware Remote Console 7.0.1. But we have problems on our Citrix Terminalserver (Windows 2012 R2): When we close a Remote Console, the prozess "vmrc.exe" didn´t disappear and causes a high CPU load (one complete core). This happens when we use the IE, Chrome or Firefox.
    I don´t know why this happens, have anyone an idea? Thank you!

    One thing to check is that there isn't some other process running in the background which is also using a lot of the CPU. Open Activity Monitor and select "All Processes" at the top and "CPU" on the bottom bar. If you find some process other than the BOINC that is using a lot of the CPU, highlight it and quit it and see if this helps.
    If you haven't already, install iStatPro from the Apple site and keep an eye on your computer temperatures and on your fans. As long as your fans are working properly, they should keep your processor cool enough to not overheat.
    It might also be worth investing in a chill mat, just to help keep your Mac cool overnight.
    Good luck!

  • High CPU load kills ethernet connection

    Short spikes in CPU load (MenuMeters installed) are constantly killing my internet connection.
    I use an ethernet connection with a cable modem (Motorola SB 4200 E) and have a MB 2 CD, 2 GB of RAM and OS X 10.4.9.
    After the ethernet connection is killed, only a complete re-start can fix the problem (and today alone I had to do something like 15 of them already).
    These sudden spikes in CPU load can be caused by all different kinds of activity, e.g.
    1.) playing back video files which my machine has problems dealing with (like .mkv files),
    2.) playing back 'regular' .avi files,
    3.) browsing the net (Camino, Safari, Opera, Firefox) and displaying flash content (just watching something on youtube creates a CPU load which kills the connection regularly),
    4.) any kind of activity which asks a high CPU load in general.
    It seems that the problem is caused by the CPU load in general, not by any particular application which causes the high workload.
    What I have tried:
    1.) PRAM reset
    2.) Apple Hardware Test (extended, loop)
    3.) de-installed Flash player
    4.) created a new user (admin)
    5.) made a clean 10.4.11 install on an external USB drive and booted from there
    6.) used Airport instead of the ethernet/cable modem
    7.) checked system temperatures (which are ok)
    8.) changed/exchanged/checked the RAM
    9.) made enough free disk space on my HD (15 GB)
    10.) repaired disk permissions
    but to no avail.
    Any help would be very much appreciated (since I'm ready to get a MS machine and wave my Mac good bye).
    Kind regards
    FC

    Hi Fred, and a warm welcome to the forums!
    What Firmware cersion is it?
    http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,5221851
    Mac Modem problems with Broadcom Chipset...
    All Linksys Cable Modems
    All Motorola Cable Modems except for the SB5120
    All Scientific Atlanta Cable Modems
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=2985422&#2985422
    t seems that the problem is caused by the CPU load in general, not by any particular application which causes the high workload.
    Do you have Activity Monitor set to Show All Processes?

  • Flashplayer 11.3 high cpu load + stutters

    Hey all, I recently updated my Flash Player Plugin for Firefox to version 11.3.300.268. This results in a high CPU load for the Flash Player process like 30 to 40 percent with a 480p YouTube video and some higher percentages when watching flash video on other websites. The highest percentage must have been like 70% while watching a simple flash video on another website. This high CPU load is not the only problem. The video/audio stutters from time to time and especially when you open a new website, even light ones like Google.com. This problem occurred before but at that time I downgraded my version to flashplayer11_1r102_63_win_32bit.exe which is the latest version of Flash that is working correctly on my system.
    Some specs:
    Windows Vista Home 32-bit
    Intel Celeron M530
    Intel 965 Express Chipset with latest installable drivers via HP website (7.15.10.1839)
    Firefox 14.0.1.
    Possible solutions that had no effect:
    Turning off HW acceleration in Flash settings.
    Turning off HW acceleration in Firefox settings.

    Same issue here. I'm going to downgrade as well, as it's making watching embedded videos very frustrating.

  • Xorg frequently does high cpu load.

    Hi,
    I've recently installed arch on my (new!) Asus UL30A and I've got a problem with temporal high usage of cpu by X. I've noticed it yesterday after installing gimp and running it. Cpu load was 40-60%. Now I've got htop always open and when I just do stuff (conkeror+couple of terminals) in dwm it jumps to >30%. Is it normal? How can I deal with it?
    It's clean new arch install.
    Conky has 2sec update, double buffer on but it's outputted to console ( I dunno if it's needed to solve my problem )
    .xinitrc: http://pastebin.ca/1919877
    .xorg.conf: http://pastebin.ca/1919882
    .Xorg.0.log: http://pastebin.ca/1919883

    Why are logical reads responsible for high CPU load?First of all, I would like to recommend a good book on 'SQL Tuning' by Don Tow. Its really worthy to have.
    Coming to your qeustion, when a session needs to access blocks in the buffer cache, its needs to acquire a latch, and latch and it uses few CPU cycles to acquire it. Therefore, reading blocks from memory (buffer cache) in terms of CPU, are very costly.
    How to avoid logical reads?Avoid unnecessary block access, either removing indexes, reading only required blocks, also tunig the query according to its cardinality in the execution plan. (compare with v$sql_plan_statistics cardinality.)
    Download a paper from the following link
    http://www.hotsos.com/e-library/abstract.php?id=6
    Title:      Why a 99%+ Database Buffer Cache Hit Ratio is Not Ok
    Author:      Cary Millsap
    Jaffar

  • Syslogd makes high CPU Load and standby mode doesn´t work.

    After updating to Leopard I see high CPU Load caused by syslogd daemon(40%-80%) and my MacBook has problems with standby mode. After stopping the white LED lights and CPU fan speeds up. Is there any chance to fix these problems?

    OK.. here's where I'm at with troubleshooting this. As I said before, for ME it occurred simultaneous to a low or out of memory situation. I don't know if syslogd was using my the ram, or if the low ram was a symptom of an issue that syslogd was getting caught up in reporting... but the system log file had tens of THOUSANDS of out of memory errors listed. Almost all were from dashboard.
    So... I've done the following. In dashboard I closed ALL open widgets. I disabled spaces (since in another thread someone indicated it used a lot of memory). I ran Leopard Cache Cleaner and used it to perform maintenances, run the os scripts and rebuild caches and so on. Rebooted.
    Now its working fine! Since then its been over 24 hrs and I STILL have over 300megs of ram reported free on a 1 gig system. I've used everything else like normal (safari, mail, ichat, itunes, etc..). Where the problem used to happen after a couple of hours after a reboot every time, now it seems normal. No out of mem, and syslogd is running normally (apparently).
    I will run a few apps that I havent run in a while and see if those create an issue. If not, later today I will enable spaces and see how that does after a few hours. Finally I'll add in the dashboard widgets one at a time to see if the issue lies there. I'll report back here if I discover anything.

  • Problem... High CPU load with HDD. Please Help

    Hello all,
    Im stuck. Ive got a MSI KA790GX which has poor HDD access/transfer, low burst rate and very high CPU load.
    As far as i know the Western Digital 640gb WD6401AALS Black should be a fast hard drive. Which according to reviews/HD Tune,
    should be:-
    Minimum 60mb/sec
    Maximum 120mb/sec
    Average 95mb/sec
    Access 12ms
    Burst 110mb/sec
    CPU 5%
    No matter what I try, i always get poor results...
    My MSI KA790GX
    Minimum 41mb/sec ~ 54mb/sec
    Maximum 104mb/sec ~ 108mb/sec
    Average 86mb/sec ~89mb/sec
    Access 12ms
    Burst 60mb/sec ~ 80mb/sec
    CPU 26% ~ 44%!!!!!!!!
    I could accept not getting the same high speed results as the review/reference, even if the burst rate sucked.
    But one of the cores goes to 50%-60% load during hdd activity. Thats just crazy!!
    I have tried...
    IDE mode, AHCI, RAID Ready, RAID Single Disk
    SATA Port 1, 2, 3, 4 + 5
    Different SATA cables
    Flashed bios, cleared bios, optimised defaults, failsafe defaults
    Windows XP 32bit, Vista 32bit, Vista 64bit. fresh installs
    MSI CD Drivers, MSI Web Drivers, AMD/ATI Web Drivers
        ... and combinations of.
    I have also tested the WD640gb Black on another older PC, with Nvidia (55?) chipset and slower (1.9ghz x2) cpu.
    Transfer rates were slightly better than my KA790GX but, Burst Rate = 115mb/sec and CPU usage = 13%.
    I also tried a Seagate 1.5tb (ST31500341AS) on both PCs,
    Nvidia chipset
    Minimum 65mb/sec
    Maximum 134mb/sec
    Average 107mb/sec
    Access 14ms
    Burst 83mb/sec
    CPU 7%
    On my MSI KA790GX
    Minimum 55mb/sec
    Maximum 120mb/sec
    Average 100mb/sec
    Access 14ms
    Burst 87mb/sec
    CPU 33%!!!!
    Could someone please please help, ive spent hours and hours on this. Its doin my head in.
    I just hope its something stupid ive missed, cos i still not used my HD4850 from christmas :-(
    Thanks.

    Sm3K3R
    Not sure how to check PIO/DMA mode on a SATA device. IDE devices show DMA enabled.
    BIOS version 1.4 - 29 December 2008, and now version 1.51
    Fredrik
    I have Vista 64, but i did try XP32 and Vista32 and got similar poor results.
    I tested HDD speed with, HD Tune 2.55 and HD Tune 3.50 trial.
    No auto-start programs really, Windows clean installs + any drivers.
    Quadrifoglio Verde
    CPU @ default 2800mhz, All mem bios options to auto/defaults
    Windows Experience Index, CPU Score = 5.3
    AMD Overdrive
     Integer Computation = 8220
     Floating Point Computation = 5325
     Memory speed = 1770
     Cache Speed = 10790
     System Performance = 7403
    Bas
    I used HDTune because I could reference to other results. Whats a better program to use?
    Windows Experience Index, HDD Score = 5.9.
    But I have no reference and cant be sure of cpu load.
    Sepher
    Bios defaults to C&C and C1E off so i have tried them. Also windows power settings, balanced/high performance.
    UPDATE
    Reinstalled Vista64 but loaded the AHCI driver from the disk config screen. This seems to have stopped the high cpu usage during disk activity.
    HDTune with Windows Power settings @ High Performance,
    Min = 52mb/sec
    Max = 106mb/sec
    Ave = 88mb/sec
    Access = 12ms
    Burst = 77mb/sec
    CPU = 3.4% 
    HDTune with Windows Power settings @ Balanced
    Min = 54mb/sec
    Max = 104mb/sec
    Ave = 87mb/sec
    Access = 12ms
    Burst = 65mb/sec
    CPU = 12%
    So now transfer speed is about 10% slower than reference. But burst speed is terrible.
    I also used IBM Feature Tool to change the HDD AAM to 'performance mode' 254 as suggested elsewhere.
    Long shot as the hdd performs ok with other hardware. same results.
    Also MSI support asked me to try a newer bios, version 1.51. same results.
    Anyone know what the AMD 7-Series Chipsets Disk Performance Utility does, and should i run it in Vista64?
    Thanks for all the replies, hope i can sort this, not played any PC games since Quake 3 on my ti4600...

Maybe you are looking for