High cpu usage by oracle.exe even when oracle instance is down

hi,
I made my oracle instance down , but in Windows Task manager , it is showing 88-90% CPU usage.This only goes off when i write net stop oracleservicemisdb from command prompt.
Help me.
Thanks
Deepak Kumar Sahoo

No, i don't have any other software related to oracle running on our server . We have tomcat and Weblogic server running on same machine. But oracle.exe is showing more than 75% cpu usage even when the instance is down.
thanks
Deepak Kumar

Similar Messages

  • High CPU Usage by acsvc.exe

    I'm getting 40%-50% constant CPU usage by acsvc.exe. Has anybody experienced this before?
    This may have started after I updated the Access Connection program. 
    I am using XP SP3 on T60.
    TIA for your help!
    Bob 

    Search on "acsvc" on the forum or go to
    http://forum.lenovo.com/lnv/board/message?board.id=Special_Interest_Utilities&message.id=1812&query....
    T60: 6371-CTO, VISTA Home Premium+SP1, 2GB....R51: 1836-Q4U,XP,1GB...600...755CD

  • High CPU Usage by System.exe (20-60%) only when system is idle

    When I leave my computer idle (for 60 seconds or longer usually) the System.exe process begins consuming all of the CPU resources. I ran xperf but am having trouble finding the root cause of this CPU spike. This problem is only present since installing Windows
    8.
    This .7z etl file is here: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/64956730/HighCPUUsage.7z
    Anyone able to assist on this?
    ** I have followed some of the instructions on the threads here: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/W8ITProPreRel/thread/81d8345d-4acd-43e8-947b-7971e3893b99 and http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/W8ITProPreRel/thread/c3f06d6d-d7ba-4427-9ceb-05e88a5e31e9

    Hi,
    Please also check the issue referring to the method below:
    Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization issues using Tracelog.exe
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2012/01/20/troubleshooting-high-cpu-utilization-issues-using-tracelog-exe.aspx
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks.
    Nicholas Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • High CPU usage by ElementsAutoanalyzer.exe

    hi.
    When i turn on my PC, i find immediately that ElementsAutoanalyzer.exe reaches 30-50% CPU usage, even though Premiere Elements (or any other application) has not been launched yet.
    i have to end this program manualy with Task Manager
    how can i disable ElementsAutoanalyzer.exe?
    Premiere Elements 10 on Windows7 Home Edition 64 bit SP1

    AnnaN2013
    This is not Adobe. Rather user to user.
    If you need to make your comments known to Adobe, you should consider
    a. Fill out one of those Adobe Feature Request Bug Report Forms
    https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform&loc=en
    b. While version 12 is still the current version, contact Adobe via its Adobe Chat to sort out the details of your particular issue with the program.
    By the way, what is the problem...I do not understand "....and I see it being sent back?" part of
    Adobe look at this I just got premiere 12 to go with lightroom/photoshop and I see it being sent back!
    ATR
    Add On... If you would like us to try to help you troubleshoot your Premiere Elements issues, please supply more details in your own new thread instead of getting your 2014 issue hidden in a March 2013 thread of another. But, Adobe Chat would be the first stop.

  • High CPU usage for tcc.exe on Windows XP

    We have the following setup which hosts a JAVA client application:
    A Netra T12 which is used as a GUI server + SGD server.
    A 490 acting as another GUI server.
    Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP SP1 for the SGD client sessions.
    When we run clients via this setup, we run into an issue where tcc suddenly starts eating up 50 - 99% cpu causing the clients to slow down.
    Has anyone else experienced this issue? I can share configuration info but any help would be appreciated.

    High CPU utilization is mostly due to queries or the background activity performed by Oracle.
    Submit your statsapck report to www.statspackanalyzer.com and get the report in understandable format. Then you know where to look into.

  • My laptop (win7 2ghz, 1gig) has 100% cpu usage with itunes installed (even when not running itunes) since the upgrade.  i had to uninstall.  tried installing but still the same problem.  my daughter wants the new ipad, but this is a serious problem.

    when itunes upgraded my laptop went to 100% cpu usage.  only solution was uninstall.  have tried itunes again as my daughter wants the new ipad.  still same problem tho so not keen to spend £400 on new pad without pc support.  anyone help?  (ps been using ipod touches 1 and 2, been great source of pleasure for my two girls, but cant sync them, so using the little shuffles for music, syncing to an old version of itunes on an old netbook - had the sense to switch off upgrades when the new version went wrong)

    Close your iTunes,
    Go to command Prompt -
    (Win 7/Vista) - START/ALL PROGRAMS/ACCESSORIES, right mouse click "Command Prompt", choose "Run as Administrator".
    (Win XP SP2 & above) - START/ALL PROGRAMS/ACCESSORIES/Command Prompt
    In the "Command Prompt" screen, type in
    netsh winsock reset
    Hit "ENTER" key
    Restart your computer.
    If you do get a prompt after restart windows to remap LSP, just click NO.
    Now launch your iTunes and see if it is working now.
    If you are still having these type of problems after trying the winsock reset, refer to this article to identify which software in your system is inserting LSP:
    iTunes 10.5 for Windows: May see performance issues and blank iTunes Store
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4123?viewlocale=en_US

  • High CPU usage with emagent.exe when system is very busy

    We have run into an issue with the emagent consuming a lot of CPU when our databases and overall systems get taxed. It does not appear that the emagent is the cause of the initial problem. But once resources start to get taxed and there is an overall slowdown in performance, the emagent starts consuming more and more CPU. Messages appear in the log indicating that it is waiting on certain actions, such as:
    :activity_pending is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    It is almost as if the longer it takes to get a response the harder it tries and the more resources it consumes. In other words, it is making a bad situation worse. It would be nice if there were some configuration parameters that could limit the retry rate.
    Has anyone run into this issue? I have opened an SR with Oracle support a few months ago but haven't got anywhere.
    The OS is AIX 5.3 and the grid version is 10gR2.

    Thanks for the info. I will pass on the SR # to see if it helps.
    Here is the tail end of an emagent.trc:
    2006-08-04 09:28:45 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HPR:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:28:53 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:28:56 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:29:05 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:29:27 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:29:31 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:haconfig4_collection+sga_pool_wastage_9i+Database_Resource_Usage_9i+UserAudit is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:29:32 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HPR:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:29:45 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HPR:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:29:53 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:29:56 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:29:58 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:instance_efficiency_9i+UserBlock_9i+rac_global_cache_9i+haconfig2_collection+ha_rac_intrconn_traffic is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:30:05 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:30:27 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:30:32 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HPR:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:30:45 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HPR:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:30:53 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:30:56 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:31:05 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:31:27 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:31:32 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HPR:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:31:45 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HPR:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:31:53 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:31:56 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:32:05 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:32:27 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:32:32 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HPR:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:32:36 Thread-1398 WARN vpxoci: OCI Error -- ErrorCode(972): ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    SQL = "/* OracleOEM */
    SELECT estimated_mttr "Estimated MTTR"
    FROM v$insta"...
    LOGIN = dbsnmp/<PW>@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=pshrp)(PORT=1521))(CONNECT_DATA=(SID=HQA)))
    2006-08-04 09:32:36 Thread-1398 ERROR fetchlets.sql: ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    2006-08-04 09:32:36 Thread-1398 ERROR engine: [oracle_database,HQA,ha_mttr] : nmeegd_GetMetricData failed : ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    2006-08-04 09:32:36 Thread-1398 WARN collector: <nmecmc.c> Error exit. Error message: ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    2006-08-04 09:32:45 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HPR:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:32:54 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:sessions_in_wait_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:32:56 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:HAT:wait_bottlenecks_9i is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:32:58 Thread-804 WARN scheduler: oracle_database:H75:activity_pending is due to run again but is still running from last schedule
    2006-08-04 09:33:02 Thread-515 WARN http: -1,5: nmehl_httpListener: signaled to exit from emctl

  • High cpu usage when the system is idle

    I do have a high cpu usage problem when the system is idle. I bought the laptop (lenovo x230 tablet) with windows 7 installed in it. Then upgraded to windows 8. But ever since I have problems with high cpu usage by the system even when the computer is idle.
    Only the system by itself uses around 30% of the cpu all the time. I ran xperf, and here is the result of it:
    http://sdrv.ms/Kj6CFN
    I appreciate any help you can provide.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    I'm sorry for that the log you provide can't be opened on my computer. While according to your description, it should had a special process that consume CPU usage when system idle Iguess, isn't it?
    You can use
    Process Explorer to monitor the process activity, may be we can find the reason of this problem.
    Note: We can use Process Explorer to check the Stack of every process then analyize the problem in deep.
    To gave a better insight about this problem, you can take a ScreenShot for this problem and provide the picture here.
    Roger Lu
    TechNet Community Support

  • High CPU usage when in Gmail's standard HTML mode

    Issue: High CPU usage (> 50%, often > 90%) ONLY when Gmail page is open. When page is closed or if I switch to basic HTML, CPU usage drops to less than 10%.
    Macbook | OS X 10.6.3 | 2.4 GHz Intel Core Duo | 4 GB RAM | FF 3.63
    == URL of affected sites ==
    http://mail.google.com

    I have a similar on my son's account on when he play games spel.nl. I think the problem is a Flash player that doesn't let go of the CPU, even when another user has the screen.

  • High CPU Usage in Word 2013

    Hi everyone,
    I'm having an issue with Word 2013 and I'm hoping someone can help. Seen as I got fleeced for my TechNet subscription this year (the price given on the invoice doubled when I called up to pay!) I’d very much like to see a speedy fix from the Microsofties
    please! :D
    Recently, I've found that Word will consistently exhibit high CPU utilisation, ~50% on a dual core second generation Core i5.
    This continues, even when I’m not providing any input to or interacting with the Word window and even when the Word window is covered by other windows. Minimising Word causes its CPU usage to drop back down to zero.
    The strange thing is that, so far, I’ve only observed this with a single document. I started writing this document at the start of this week and it’s been authored exclusively on Word 2013. In fact I’m the only one who’s editing it and I’ve only used a single
    computer (and this one single install of Word 2013) to do so…
    There’s nothing particularly unusual about this document, and a different but similar document which uses the same themes and features (in fact the theme for the second document was created from the first one) doesn’t appear to cause the same issues. Both
    these documents are stored on SkyDrive, and are being edited directly from there.
    Initially I tried the much recommended tweaks of disabling hardware graphics acceleration and sub-pixel positioning, however neither of these has had any effect.
    I investigated a bit further using Sysinternals Process Monitor, and found that while Word is using a lot of CPU it’s actually looping very, very quickly polling for the existence of the registry key “HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Avalon.Graphics”.
    This key doesn’t exist on my system, and a quick test I conducted where I created it just lead to Word looping polling for more non-existent registry keys.
    My system is a HP Folio 13 running Windows 8 Pro x64 with Office 2013 (RTM, not Beta) 32 bit. Both Windows and Office are fully patched, as is everything else on the system.
    Thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer.
    Chris

    Hello again,
    After working on my problematic document some more, I believe I’ve found the cause of the issue.
    @Microsofties – I think this one is either a bug or a dodgy OOTB template…
    I noticed that the high CPU usage only seemed to occur when the document’s footer was displayed. Experimenting with some careful scrolling and zooming to hide footer (without actually using the “hide white-space” option) seemed to confirm this so I investigated
    the footer a bit more.
    My document was using the standard Word “Facet (Odd Page)” footer template with a couple of fields added to suit my needs, namely “Publish Date” and a page number.
    The template seems to be structured such that the content of the footer is inside two nested text boxes (one inside the other). I also noticed previously that this footer template also appears to “jump” up each page and back down again as I scrolled.
    So I deleted the footer and its text boxes, and recreated the same content, in the same position (using the standard paragraph alignment tools) by hand without the nested text boxes. This has, so far, fixed the issue!
    I also noticed that the CPU usage dropped right down to idle the moment I deleted the nested text boxes.
    Altogether, this leads me to conclude that the “Facet (Odd Page)” footer template in Word 2013 is the source of my issue. Specifically, I believe that the use of nested text boxes in this template causes Word’s interactions with the .Net 4.5 WPF to go a
    bit nuts, as evidenced by the infinite loop of request for the non-existent “Avalon.Graphics” WPF registry key I mentioned previously.
    It would be nice to see some feedback on this one, Microsoft people, if only to know if this is actually a general issue or is specific to my document!
    Thanks, Chris

  • Weak performance and high cpu usage

    I've been wondering for sometime now, how can some flash games run so laggy on my pc at the same time where i run DX and OpenGL games without any problem and smooth!
    Whenever i play games in FB or any other site, i notice high cpu usage about 70-90% especially when i run them fullscreen (1152x864) and with effects enabled then my system kneals almost!!!!!! This is UNACCEPTABLE of course..
    I also found an interesting article which i dought if it has been updated as it was supposed to, which is the following link: http://forums.adobe.com/message/5417983#5417983
    I run Flash player on an Intel E5700 - Win XP sp3 - 4GB ram and an Nvidia GTX650.. for those who understand, such a system is in position to run flash games like an adult holds a baby in his arms... so either the hardware acceleration does not work or adobe has let this problem unresolved for years now as i have made an interesting research on this case before i come here.
    For the records, i run flash games within Chrome since it's proved to be the most apropriate browser for videos and flash-shockwave games.. firefox comes 2nd to me and IE 8.....leave it unused better!
    Even in 2006 up to today, people are facing high cpu usage and weak performance in flash apps no matter what pc they have, so who is to blame here?? Adobe ofc.
    Is there anyone who has a solution to propose or has found somethin relevant to this case? Or should we wait a solution in 2020?

    Mike M., i didn't give any load or credit on u, but Adobe, as i see you're not responsible for their mistakes or ignorance so i have nothin to ask from u, i have seen that u reply to ppl and good for u.
    All i have to say to what u replied, is that, what if win xp reach the end of life? i mention a problem that remains for years now and is unresolved, or didn't they see that the previous years?since 2008 let's say!!!
    I have noticed the same exactly behavior on newer OS and specifically tested on Win Vista 32-64 and Win 7 32-64 too..... it's EXACTLY the same behavior, so it's not OS dependant, i won't take any excuse for Adobe cause i have experienced their terrible work on flash-shockwave for too long.
    It's their responsibility to solve it but they have chosen to ignore this and many other mistakes that users report weekly for years, their response is 2/10 solved... it's just disgusting. I dont' want to argue with anyone for Adobe's shake, they don't worth it.

  • CSA 4.5.1(657) high cpu usage on windows 2003 sp1

    Hi,
    We have experiancing high cpu usage on windows 2003 sp1, when somebody logs in remotely. The server has 1gb of ram and the cpu is 2ghz. The Cisco Trust Agent (1.0.55) is installed also.
    When somebody logs in remotely the process okclient goes to 100% cpu and eats all the available RAM and the machine starts to swap, the pagefile has grown to 1gb. This is not all the time though, only in some cases like this one.
    Could this be due to some specigic policies associated with this machine be the cause of such behaviour?

    Hi Rossen,
    It could be due to some @remote rule but first some questions:
    What is the server function?
    What groups is it in?
    Does it have 2 enabled NICS?
    Is it sharing anything other than admin shares?
    Is it a member of AD\Domain or standalone?
    Why is the CTA installed?
    Why is your page file dynamic and not static and why is it only 1GB (should be 1.5x physical RAM)? Growing a page file is a slow and painful process.
    You can try some things right away:
    Either remove if from the groups that have @remote rules or put the server in a group with no rules\policies at all. That will tell you if it's the agent or the rules causing the problem.
    Good luck!
    Tom

  • What Causes High CPU Usage Even When PC is Idle

    How can I fixed the high cpu usage on my pc?

    mcmillan wrote:
    rohankolay wrote:Right now i have kernel26-2.6.35.4 which i updated on 27 aug. That is around the same time the problem began.Should i downgrade it to kernel26-2.6.35.3 or kernel26-2.6.34.3?
    I think most people have been seeing the problems in any of the 2.6.35 kernels, so 2.6.34.3 would be my recommendation
    +1
    And put kernel26 in IgnorePkg.

  • High CPU Usage On client application when upgrade remote SQL database

    Hi,
    Is anyone here encountered very high CPU usage after upgraded the database from SQL 2005 to SQL 2012? Following describes my issue.
    I have my client application running on Windows 7 that access to central database (SQL 2005) on Windows server 2003 using ODBC connection, this client application basically query data and perform data insert and update. There are a number of this similar
    clients connected to the database.
    Due to slowness of the database server, company decided to upgrade the database server to SQL 2012 and also new hardware runing Windows Server 2012. There is no change on the client application and client hardware and the client application still using the
    same ODBC connection to query, insert or update the new database server.
    The problem I am now experiencing now is that my client PC where my client application running the CPU usage is very high almost hitting 100% when accessing to the central database. I am also noticed this program lsass.exe that utilized almost 40-50% of
    the CPU time when client application accessing the central database.
    Is anyone here know, why client PC CPU usage 100% when access to upgraded SQL 2012 database? What is lsass.exe program doing, it only appear when accessing to database server. How to reduce the CPU usage on client?
    Thanks.
    Chee Wee.

    Hello,
    After upgrading, please rebuild indexes and update statistics on the databases.
    http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1367/sql-server-script-to-rebuild-all-indexes-for-all-tables-and-all-databases/
    http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1606/execute-update-statistics-for-all-sql-server-databases/
    Configure maxdop on the instance.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlsakthi/archive/2012/05/24/wow-we-have-maxdop-calculator-for-sql-server-it-makes-my-job-easier.aspx
    If the above does not solve the issue, let us know.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • Continual HD activity, high CPU usage when idle

    I got my first notebook, a Compaq V2000, a few weeks ago and have Arch set up pretty well on it but I have a few issues.  Even when the machine is sitting idle it sounds like the HD is doing a read (or whatever) about every 5 seconds.  This only starts after I log into Gnome and stops if I log out.
    I tried a couple of things with hdparm:
    If I try 'hdparm -y /dev/hda' the drive goes to standby but immediately spins up again.
    'hdparm -B 255 /dev/hda' disables APM and stops the cyclic behavior.  This would seem to be good but during the 5 second cycle the drive alternates between quiet and noisy and this leaves it in the noisy state.
    I tried to determine what might be causing all this disk activity so I edited lilo.conf to remove "acpi=on apm=off" from the "append=" line and in rc.conf I put a ! in front of all modules and daemons and rebooted.  I removed the applets from task bar.  No change.
    I ran top to see if I could tell what was accessing the HD but I'm not knowledgable enough to make much sense of it.  I did notice that on my notebook the top summary shows:
    CPU: ~30% user, ~10% system, ~60% idle with 'wait' bouncing between 0 and 5% 
    On my main computer, also running Arch/Gnome, I get
    CPU: ~2% user, ~1% system, ~97% idle with 'wait' solid at 0%
    On the notebook, if I run hdparm -B 255 /dev/hda the CPU #'s for user and system remain high but the wait # drops to zero and stays there.
    I don't think all this HD activity could be good for my machine, and I know I find it very annoying.  If anyone could help me stop all the HD accesses and understand the high CPU usage I would appreciate it.

    I loaded lsof and frankly it scared me.  It listed what looked like a couple hundred files and I didn't know exactly how to use that information.
    Then I tried laptop-mode-tools.  The man pages didn't sound too promising since it uses, among other things, hdparm, which I already tried with mixed results.  I gave it a try anyway and right out of the box, with no configuration, it worked.  HD access when idle dropped to essentially none, the drive spins down and the cooling fan runs much less frequently.
    So far all I have changed in the config file are the HD idle timeouts.  The default of 5 seconds was starting and stopping the HD too often so I changed that to 20 seconds for now.
    Whatever laptop-mode did to stop the 5-second HD accesses the effect persists even if I run 'laptop_mode stop' and '/etc/rc.d/laptop-mode stop'.  When I get the time I should be able to use 'laptop_mode status' and laptop-mode.conf settings to determine exactly what the magic bullet was.
    Thanks, lucke.  I never would have tried laptop-mode on my own because I thought it only duplicated functionality that I already had with hdparm and powernowd.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I reinstall my Airport extreme?

    I am having problems reinstalling my airport extreme, I need to reconfigure it, having security issues.Please helping me , do I need to un install first, to reconfigure set up.

  • Where are the  FileInfo panels for Photoshop CC?

    I need to install a custom one that is working for CS5 and CS6, so that it can be seen and used in CC. But I don't know where to put it?  (on the Mac) for CS5 it goes here: Main 3.0: /Library/Application Support/Adobe/XMP/Custom File Info Panels/3.0/

  • Replacing any non english Characters

    How can I Replace any non english characters I have alot of the characters that look like a block. --John                                                                                                                                                 

  • 6i to 10g Font Problems

    We have a lot of reports running in 6i with The title having 3 lines in it. The first line's font is courier new 8 italic The second line's font is courier new 11 Bold The third line's font is courier new 10 Bold In 6i the first line does not print i

  • Text below photo album too far down when viewing individual photos

    In iweb, I've made pages of photos. I have text below the photo album. On this page: http://axleart.com/index/Thelma_Mathias.html#1 the text pops up right below the photo when I shift from thumbnail to individual photos. I like this. On other pages,