High CPU usage for Mail/Address Book with Exchange/GMail

I reinstalled 10.6 on my MacBook Pro because it since the upgrade from 10.5 performance has been generally lousy and I wanted to make a fresh start. I am finding that my performance problems with Mail (which connects to both Gmail and Exchange) is still poor At all times, even when Mail is not processing any connections to either mail server, it consumes about 25% CPU just being idle. Oddly, Address Book uses 25% minimum CPU at all times. Also, in Address Book, I see the contact list for my Exchange account has the progress meter spinning at all times, even after a full reboot of the computer. My Mail and Contact lists are fully synced up at this point so I am not sure what all the overhead is for. It really drags down general performance of the machine, especially when I attempt to load any complex pages in Safari where I constantly see the pinwheel. This is all pretty troubling since this is a fresh install of the OS and I actually have same problems as I had with Mail before plus I now have new problems with Address Book that I DIDN'T have before. I haven't even turned on Time Machine because after the way it affected performance on my previous install for 15 minutes out of every hour it will surely render my machine useless.
In a word, "Help".

My problem doesn't align exactly with yours, but I'd suggest you try this anyway (especially if you aren't using RSS within Mail - this is sure to blow away any Mail.app RSS feeds):
+So, if you see the Mail application growing in size until it aborts, it appears that the most direct fix is to quit Mail and delete the ~/Library/Mail/AvailableFeeds and ~/Library/Mail/AvailableFeeds-journal files. No reboots or other actions are required.+
Details? See: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10976938&#10976938

Similar Messages

Mail & Address Book with Exchange = Problems Problems Problems

Hi All,
There is a serious issue with Mail/Address Book in Lion with Exchange Server 2010. I have had nothing but grief since upgrading and I have been able to recreate my scenario on two macs using two different profiles so I know it's not related to any settings or anything. None of these problems appear in Outlook 2011.
Basically, to sum up the massive list of problems:
The connection to Exchange drops all the time. I have to use to function "Take my accounts online" about 60-70 times per day.
Trying to send new e-mail often results in a pop-up box indicating that the server isn't available to send (with the options to Try Again With Selected Server or Try Later)
GAL look up for names takes forever. Sometimes the GAL will come up right away, but often times, there's the spinning progress indicator that can take upwards of 1-3 minutes to find the name in the GAL. Same in Address Book, spinning indicator trying to retrieve the GAL.
When sending e-mails, Mail seems to "duplicate" the last name of the person I'm sending the e-mail to if I've already sent them an e-mail in the past (even if I clear the previous recipients list). For example, "John Smith" would appear as "John Smith Smith"
Trying to move messages often fails. I suspect this is due to issue #1 above.
Like I mentioned, none of these problems occur in Outlook. Granted, I would much prefer to use Mail as the search functions are much faster and the program is snappier.
Has anyone else experienced similar issues with Mail on Lion + Exchange 2010 servers? At this point I'm wondering if it's potentially a configuration issue with our exchange provider (and if so, what would it be?).
Cheers,

I'm having this same problem with syncing address book to exchange contacts. I know I have the correct exchange server specified because I have it in both Apple Mail and on my phone. Also, In the past i have been able to sync address book, but at some point that stopped working. Exchange is syncing perfectly ota to my phone, but I hate to go into OWA to add or change contacts.

High CPU usage for clementine or amarok with btrfs

Googled but no joy so far. If I run either clementine or amarok for whatever length of time (even a day or so) they take up at least one CPU flat scanning the btrfs library. No such thing with ntfs (for those windows users...) and I cannot make out why.

My problem doesn't align exactly with yours, but I'd suggest you try this anyway (especially if you aren't using RSS within Mail - this is sure to blow away any Mail.app RSS feeds):
+So, if you see the Mail application growing in size until it aborts, it appears that the most direct fix is to quit Mail and delete the ~/Library/Mail/AvailableFeeds and ~/Library/Mail/AvailableFeeds-journal files. No reboots or other actions are required.+
Details? See: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10976938&#10976938

High CPU usage for webservd

we are seeing a very high CPU usage for webservd. looking at the java stack it seems to be threads communicating to sun one LDAP server.
Anyone experienced this? is there a know issue in Java LDAP SDK?
Sun ONE Web Server 6.1SP4 B12/16/2004
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu0 10 0 59:30:33 8.8% webservd/6235
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu16 10 0 223:58:38 8.7% webservd/5043
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu17 10 0 545:54:49 8.7% webservd/2902
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 10 0 379:07:26 8.3% webservd/3996
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu1 30 0 213:54:52 8.3% webservd/5115
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 20 0 56:03:44 8.2% webservd/6265
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu18 30 0 556:18:29 8.2% webservd/2830
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu3 30 0 548:09:11 8.2% webservd/2890
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 20 0 328:18:42 8.1% webservd/4359
17393 root 3741M 1655M cpu2 30 0 5:11:16 8.1% webservd/6722
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 20 0 181:49:48 8.1% webservd/5322
17393 root 3741M 1655M run 20 0 251:44:35 7.8% webservd/4857
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: "BlockedThread" daemon prio=1
0 tid=0x01110650 nid=0xb56 runnable [0x1714f000..0x1714fc10]
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: at netscape.ldap.LDAPSe
archListener.nextMessage(LDAPSearchListener.java:86)
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: at netscape.ldap.LDAPSe
archListener.getResponse(LDAPSearchListener.java:77)
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: at com.iplanet.services
.ldap.event.BlockedThread.run(BlockedThread.java:121)
[02/Aug/2006:15:06:16] warning (17393): CORE3283: stderr: at java.lang.Thread.run
(Thread.java:595)

forgot to mention: OS is solaris 9

High cpu usage for garbage collection (uptime vs total gc time)

Hi Team,
We have a very high cpu usage issue in the production.
When we restart the server, the cpu idle time would be around 95% and it comes down as days goes by. Today idle cpu is 30% and it is just 6th day after the server restart.
Environemnt details:
Jrockit version:
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_05-b04)
BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_05 JVM R24.4.0-1 (build ari-38120-20041118-1131-linux-ia32, Native Threads, GC strategy: parallel)
Gc Algorithm: JRockit Garbage Collection System currently running strategy: Single generational, parallel mark, parallel sweep
Number Of Processors: 4
Max Heap Size: 1073741824
Total Garbage Collection Time: 21:43:56.5
Uptime: 114:33:4.1
Total Garbage Collection Count: 420872
Total Number Of Threads: 198
Number Of Daemon Threads: 191
Can you guys please tell me what would be problem in the server which causing the high cpu usage?
One more thing I would like to know is that why the total number of threads is 198 when we specified the Executor pool size as 25? I agree that weblogic would create some threads for its maintenance but around 160 threads!!! something is wrong I guess.
Santhosh.
[email protected]

Hi,
I'm having a similar problem, but haven't been able to resolve it yet. Troubleshooting is made even harder by the fact that this is only happening on our production server, and I've been unable to reproduce it in the lab.
I'll post whatever findings I have and hopefully we'll be able to find a solution with the help of BEA engineers.
In my case, I have a stand-alone Tomcat server that runs fine for about 1-2 days, and then the JVM suddenly starts using more CPU, and as a result, the server load shoots up (normal CPU utilization is ~5% but eventually goes up to ~95%; load goes from 0.1 to 4+).
What I have found so far is that this corresponds to increased GC activity.
Let me list my environment specs before I proceed, though:
CPU: Dual Xeon 3.06GHz
RAM: 2GB
OS: RHEL4.4 (2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp)
JVM build 1.5.0_03-b07 (BEA JRockit(R) (build dra-45238-20050523-2008-linux-ia32, R25.2.0-28))
Tomcat version 5.5.12
JAVA_OPTS="-Xms768m -Xmx768m -XXtlasize16k -XXlargeobjectlimit16k -Xverbose:memory,cpuinfo -Xverboselog:/var/log/tomcat5/jvm.log -Xverbosetimestamp"
Here are excerpts from my verbose log (I'm getting some HT warning, not sure if that's a problem):
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Detected SMP with 2 CPUs that support HT.
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Trying to determine if HT is enabled.
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Trying to read from /dev/cpu/0/cpuid
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Warning: Failed to read from /dev/cpu/0/cpuid
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Trying to read from /dev/cpu/1/cpuid
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Warning: Failed to read from /dev/cpu/1/cpuid
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] HT is: supported by the CPU, not enabled by the OS, enabled in JRockit.
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:18 2006][22855][cpuinfo] Warning: HT enabled even though OS does not seem to support it.
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:55 2006][22855][memory ] GC strategy: System optimized over throughput (initial strategy singleparpar)
[Fri Oct 20 15:54:55 2006][22855][memory ] heap size: 786432K, maximal heap size: 786432K
[Fri Oct 20 16:07:30 2006][22855][memory ] Changing GC strategy to generational, parallel mark and parallel sweep
[Fri Oct 20 16:07:30 2006][22855][memory ] 791.642-791.874: GC 786432K->266892K (786432K), 232.000 ms
[Fri Oct 20 16:08:02 2006][22855][memory ] 824.122: nursery GC 291998K->274164K (786432K), 175.873 ms
[Fri Oct 20 16:09:51 2006][22855][memory ] 932.526: nursery GC 299321K->281775K (786432K), 110.879 ms
[Fri Oct 20 16:10:24 2006][22855][memory ] 965.844: nursery GC 308151K->292222K (786432K), 174.609 ms
[Fri Oct 20 16:11:54 2006][22855][memory ] 1056.368: nursery GC 314718K->300068K (786432K), 66.032 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:21:09 2006][22855][memory ] 113210.427: nursery GC 734274K->676137K (786432K), 188.985 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:30:41 2006][22855][memory ] 113783.140: nursery GC 766601K->708592K (786432K), 96.007 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:36:15 2006][22855][memory ] 114116.332-114116.576: GC 756832K->86835K (786432K), 243.333 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:48:20 2006][22855][memory ] 114841.653: nursery GC 182299K->122396K (786432K), 175.252 ms
[Sat Oct 21 23:48:52 2006][22855][memory ] 114873.851: nursery GC 195060K->130483K (786432K), 142.122 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:01:31 2006][22855][memory ] 115632.706: nursery GC 224096K->166618K (786432K), 327.264 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:16:37 2006][22855][memory ] 116539.368: nursery GC 246564K->186328K (786432K), 173.888 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:26:21 2006][22855][memory ] 117122.577: nursery GC 279056K->221543K (786432K), 170.367 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:26:21 2006][22855][memory ] 117123.041: nursery GC 290439K->225833K (786432K), 69.170 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:29:10 2006][22855][memory ] 117291.795: nursery GC 298947K->238083K (786432K), 207.200 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:39:05 2006][22855][memory ] 117886.478: nursery GC 326956K->263441K (786432K), 87.009 ms
[Sun Oct 22 00:55:22 2006][22855][memory ] 118863.947: nursery GC 357229K->298971K (786432K), 246.643 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:08:17 2006][22855][memory ] 119638.750: nursery GC 381744K->322332K (786432K), 147.996 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:11:22 2006][22855][memory ] 119824.249: nursery GC 398678K->336478K (786432K), 93.046 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:35 2006][22855][memory ] 120436.740: nursery GC 409150K->345186K (786432K), 81.304 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:38 2006][22855][memory ] 120439.582: nursery GC 409986K->345832K (786432K), 153.534 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:42 2006][22855][memory ] 120443.544: nursery GC 410632K->346473K (786432K), 121.371 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:44 2006][22855][memory ] 120445.508: nursery GC 411273K->347591K (786432K), 60.688 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:44 2006][22855][memory ] 120445.623: nursery GC 412391K->347785K (786432K), 68.935 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:45 2006][22855][memory ] 120446.576: nursery GC 412585K->348897K (786432K), 152.333 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:21:45 2006][22855][memory ] 120446.783: nursery GC 413697K->349080K (786432K), 70.456 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:34:16 2006][22855][memory ] 121197.612: nursery GC 437378K->383392K (786432K), 165.771 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:37:37 2006][22855][memory ] 121398.496: nursery GC 469709K->409076K (786432K), 78.257 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:37:37 2006][22855][memory ] 121398.730: nursery GC 502490K->437713K (786432K), 65.747 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:44:03 2006][22855][memory ] 121785.259: nursery GC 536605K->478156K (786432K), 132.293 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:44:04 2006][22855][memory ] 121785.603: nursery GC 568408K->503635K (786432K), 71.751 ms
[Sun Oct 22 01:50:39 2006][22855][memory ] 122180.985: nursery GC 591332K->530811K (786432K), 131.831 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:13:52 2006][22855][memory ] 123573.719: nursery GC 655566K->595257K (786432K), 117.311 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:36:04 2006][22855][memory ] 124905.507: nursery GC 688896K->632129K (786432K), 346.990 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:24 2006][22855][memory ] 125765.715-125765.904: GC 786032K->143954K (786432K), 189.000 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:26 2006][22855][memory ] 125767.535-125767.761: GC 723232K->70948K (786432K), 225.000 ms
vvvvv
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:27 2006][22855][memory ] 125768.751-125768.817: GC 712032K->71390K (786432K), 64.919 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:28 2006][22855][memory ] 125769.516-125769.698: GC 711632K->61175K (786432K), 182.000 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:29 2006][22855][memory ] 125770.753-125770.880: GC 709632K->81558K (786432K), 126.000 ms
[Sun Oct 22 02:50:30 2006][22855][memory ] 125771.699-125771.878: GC 708432K->61368K (786432K), 179.000 ms
So, I'm running with the default GC strategy which lets the GC pick the most suitable approach (single space or generational). It seems to switch to generational almost immediately and runs well - most GC runs are in the nursery, and only once in a while it goes through the older space.
Now, if you look at [Sun Oct 22 02:50:27 2006], that's when everything changes. GC starts running every second (later on it's running 3 times a second) doing huge sweeps. It never goes through the nursery again, although the strategy is still generational.
It's all downhill from this point on, and it's a matter of hours (maybe a day) before we restart the server.
I guess my only question is: What would cause such GC behavior?
I would appreciate your ideas/comments!
Thanks,
Tenyo

High CPU usage when playing flv files with flash

As more and more FLV videos are moving to HD, I'm noticing
high CPU usage and lots of dropped frames when playing FLV video in
web browser with Flash 10. This is true even if the video isn't
full screen. I've tried a variety of browsers (Firefox, I.E.,
Chrome) and the problem occurs on all of them so it's pretty clear
it's a limitation in Flash.
Now my PC isn't high end (it has a Pentium M 1.86 GHz
processor), but I can take those same FLV files and load them in
something like Media Player Classic or Windows Media Player (when
using ffdshow) and play the FLV files full screen with little or no
drop in frames and an acceptable CPU rate.
This is especially annoying on sites like YouTube where I
actually have to save the video and play it back in something other
than Flash to have it play back at an acceptable rate. This doesn't
work for other sites like Amazon.
Why is the CPU usage so high when decoding and displaying
videos when compared to other media players?

I've been doing research about this excessively high CPU usage problem (100%!) for weeks because I have also experienced it with my vista home premium laptop. Just recently, I have finally found the solution. The problem is not your browser or your OS or your pc's memory. The problem is caused by authorization for flash player.
Read the link (posted below) carefully and follow the steps accordingly. If you have already done steps 1 through 6 with your computer, you can go straight to step 7.
http://thetechangel.com/blogberry/2008/10/adobe-flash-player-10-fix-for-vista-xp/
PS: I am not the author of that link, so please thank the respective site owner if you find the procedure very helpful.
Please let me know also if the link solves your problem. I am sharing this because Adobe seems unable to provide solutions to this, and I don't want to hear people suffer.
My blog:
http://literaryworks101.blogspot.com
http://bookofsalamat.blogspot.com
Thanks

High CPU usage for SERVER0 process in XI

Hi,
SERVER0 process is taking high CPU usage, previously it happen once its due to communication channel error, So we deativated some unwanted communication channels in Alert config and the CPU usage is reduced.
After some weeks its again CPU usage is increasing for SERVER0 process in some time.
Can anyone help in this case.
Thank you,
gopi.

Hi Gopi,
Check out Tim's reply and check for ur Java stack settings,
Extended Memory parameters
<i>The bottom line for J stacks is to keep everything in memory and out of swap. </i>
Other tips:
- u may try clearing folder usr\sap\<SID>\DVEBMGS00\j2ee\cluster\server0\apps
- try increasing virtual memory
- increase heap size
<i>[Reward if helpful]</i>
Regards,
Prateek

High CPU usage in Mail

I know that this topic has been discussed before, without any real cause being identified (as far as I can see). I have a specific question (at the end of the post).
I am a light Mail user, with one POP account and I don't use to-dos, MobileMe, or anything other than simple sending and receiving of emails - no more than half a dozen per day. I leave mail open in the background, sending requests for new messages every 5 minutes
On 6 or 7 occasions, mail has started to use all the available CPU time (per Activity Monitor), usually about 90%, and the computer starts to get hot - even when still in the background (i.e. I am not doing any message activity). Mail has to be quit (will quit normally), and when restarted it acts normally.
This certainly happened with 10.5.3 as well as 10.5.4 - I can't remember whether it was a problem with 10.5.2. It certainly wasn't with 10.3.x.
I wonder whether my Mail data has become damaged or corrupted in any way. So my question is: Is there any mechanism to rebuild or check the sanity of the Mail data, similar to what is available in iPhoto?
Thanks.

Just for the record, and in case any other users with the same problem come across this thread, the CPU usage problem hasn't recurred in the 2+ months since I rebuilt the mailboxes.

Why Not One App for Mail, Address Book, and Cal?

I don't understand the logic of why Apple continues to keep all these applications seperated!
Why do I need iCal, Address Book, and Mail - three seperate applications that should really be under one. All three of these apps are connected to each other, so they should all be under the same umbella! Why waste the memory and processing power having all three open and just consolidate them all into one app like every other messaging client!
Can anybody explain to me why Apple continues to keep these items in seperate applications?

Personal preference but I prefer having three separate applications.
Name like every other email client besides Microsoft's Entourage and Outlook that include all three applications under one umbrella. Entourage and Outlook define a bloated application IMO.
Entourage stores ALL data in a single large database which I'm not a fan of. If a problem develops with a single database that stores all data, there is the potential for all data to be lost. For the Mail.app, Address Book and iCal to be combined, it would probably require the same. Each has its own data files and storage location now.
When using the Mail.app, there is no reason to keep the Address Book application launched and running unless you need to edit an existing contact. You can add an email address to the Address Book that is not already entered from a received or sent message or from the list of Previous Recipients in Mail.
When the Mail.app, Address Book and iCal are launched, they take up some real memory (obviously) but combined, not much more than Entourage. When Entourage is launched and not being used, it is ALWAYS in an Active Processes state along with the Entourage Database Daemon which is not the same with the Mail.app, Address Book and iCal.

High CPU usage when playing flv files with VideoDisplay

Hi all,
Now i develop a project with VideoDisplay, my problem is when i play f4v file, my CPU usage is very high.., I also play the same file with Adobe Media Player, the problem is still exist.
Can anybody help me ~? thanks~,and sorry for my poor english~

I'm pretty sure one reason is that Flash "watches" the video so it can sync up the frames with other animations you might want to overlay.
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Developer
Adobe Systems Inc.
Blog: http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

High CPU usage for no reason

Recently, my MBP becomes hot and its battery life becomes shorter, so I checked the Activity Monitor. The CPU is reported as ~37% User and ~22% System when it's idle. But I am not running anything besides Activity Monitor and all processes show normal CPU usage in Activity Monitor.
I also heard the harddisk keeping reading/writing. The Disk Activity persistently reported 0 Reads in/sec and ~30 Writes out/sec when the computer is idle.
I have repaired permissions, and reset the PRAM, but nothing changed.
Any help would be appreciated!

Workaround and Solution!
In a nutshell: The long and short of it is that many websites today are very resource intensive. The workaround is to share the load among two to four different browsers. This workaround works every time. The browser-builders will have to make the final fixes.
I urge all of you to duplicate my results!
I've been troubleshooting this with Apple for well over 2 weeks and just discovered the root cause and workaround a couple of hours ago. Here's what I sent to Apple:
Subject:
Root Cause Identified for Case 20244XXXX!
Body:
Insufficient Stress Testing and No Load Shedding!
Hello Annette, Jim and Steve,
Please see the attached screenshots.
Engineering, especially test engineering, needs to look at this! When this is resolved Steve can go on stage and show another Safari feature that is superior to Camino, Chrome and Firefox, etc. (I was able to replicate part of this using several boxes at a local Apple Store about a week ago!)
Here’s the deal:
I was blaming Safari because I rarely use other browsers.
1. Open Activity Monitor to All Processes and order by %CPU descending.
2. Launch a browser and go to http://streamingradioguide.com/streaming-radio.php?format=1&radio-format=News/Ta lk&includeAM=on&includeFM=on&includeHD=&includeLPFM=
or http://radiotime.com/channel/c_57922/News.aspx, open a few streams and watch the %CPU skyrocket. (I often channel-flip between several streams.)
3. Document the results.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 for a second, third and fourth browser.
5. Repeat steps as needed on other test boxes. Repeat everything as needed.
6. Send the documentation of these tests to engineering.
7. Engineering: Replicate results and review all documentation.
8. Make Safari much more resource efficient than any other browser.
Steve can then demo this to the world and everyone will have another insanely great day!
Thanks for another great demo today Steve.
John
The long and short of it is that many websites today are very resource intensive. The workaround is to share the load among two to four different browsers. This workaround works every time. The browser-builders will have to make the final fixes.
Thanks,
John

High CPU usages for CCM 5.1

Hii all,
I am using 4 nos. of CCM5.1( 2 nos.of
CCM7835 & 2 nos. of CCM7815). Now only total 50 nos. of IP Phones connected with those server. but In NMS Spectrum, showing more than 95% CPU Useges and indicating Critical Error for all 4 nos. of CCM Server.
What can I do for it.plzzz..help me as soon as possible..

hii jsivulka,
thanks for reply...may I know about CSA ....
may I disable it for decrease the CPU Usages..
plzzz help me
Thanks and regards
Madhab

Satellite T130-10T: High CPU usage for non apparent reason

I have a brand new Satelitte T130.
From unboxing, I remarked that CPU usage is most of the time very high, even when doing nothing (no applications are running).
It sometimes hits 100% and stays ther for a few minutes.
I installed the newest BIOST I could find on the Toshiba site, but nothing changes.
Any ideas?
I don't like this just-out-the-box-unit already causes troubles!

Hi mate
There are a lot of applications which are running in the background.
Most of them are installed by Toshiba and such tools controls the notebook features like FN buttons, multi control buttons, eco button, etc
You can see the ruing applications in task manager. There you can also see what background process needs the CPU usage.
Greets

High CPU usage for bpel

Hi all,
We successfully deployed sample application FusionOrderDemo_R1PS2 to weblogic server,but it consumed much CPU.
Then we did a jprofile, found a thread of com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.Sweeper.run is CPU killer.
Is any developer here? Can you tell me what this thread work for and how to avoid this?
Thanks.

Better you raise an SR with Oracle Support. they should be able to help you understand what is going on with CPU usage.
.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch package -> The dispatcher layer is at the core of the bpel engine, and every request (e.g. to activate a scope, or start a process runs through the dispatch layer, by calling endrequest in the cube engine). If you need a detailed view of messages that are sent around (e.g. to expire or callback an activity), this is the place to go. [http://prsync.com/oracle/helping-oracle-support-to-help-you-5693/]

High CPU usage for tcc.exe on Windows XP

We have the following setup which hosts a JAVA client application:
A Netra T12 which is used as a GUI server + SGD server.
A 490 acting as another GUI server.
Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP SP1 for the SGD client sessions.
When we run clients via this setup, we run into an issue where tcc suddenly starts eating up 50 - 99% cpu causing the clients to slow down.
Has anyone else experienced this issue? I can share configuration info but any help would be appreciated.

High CPU utilization is mostly due to queries or the background activity performed by Oracle.
Submit your statsapck report to www.statspackanalyzer.com and get the report in understandable format. Then you know where to look into.

High CPU usage for Mail/Address Book with Exchange/GMail

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for