High CPU Usage - Satellite Pro L450 EZ-1510

Hello and thanks for reading. I am having a problem with my laptop that started a bit over a week ago. The CPU usage is very high, most of the time. I have tried a variety of things from updates to Windows and drivers, to security scans from various programs, yet the problem remains.
Basic info:
OS Version: Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium, 32 bit
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6570 @ 2.10GHz, x64 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 10
Processor Count: 2
RAM: 1912 Mb
Graphics Card: Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family, 828 Mb
Hard Drives: C: Total - 230364 MB, Free - 114501 MB;
I installed Process Explorer to have a better idea of the cause. A large part that takes up much of the CPU is the svchost.exe-taskeng.exe-NDSTray.exe-CFSwMgr.exe process.
I can easily post a HiJack this log or screen caps of Task Manager or Process Explorer, if this helps you analyze the issue.

Satellite Pro L450-EZ1510
Good detective work.
CFSwMgr.exe is the portion of your ConfigFree that resides in memory.
So it may be sufficient to uninstall and reinstall that utility.
ConfigFree for Windows 7 (32/64)
-Jerry

Similar Messages

High CPU Usage on Satellite C655S5132

High CPU usage On Satellite C655S5132 when running Window Explorer Internet and other programs. CPU use is so high it freezes computer. I have went back to original factory setting, ran virus programs nothing helps and flash player keep crashing. Please help.
Desperate

Has this been something that just recently started happening, or have you had this issue for a while? Have you installed any new programs recently?
You may want to download Glary Utilities, which is a free software(they will ask you if you want to go Pro, just say no, the free version works very well). There is a module for startup manager. You can go in and disable stuff that starts with the computer. I would advise unchecking adobe, java, quicktime, printers, etc. Anything that doesn't REALLY need to start with the computer. The nice thing with Glary is that you can restart the computer, and if you find that you need one of the programs to start with windows, you can go back in and enable it again.
The Celeron 925 processor in your computer is a decent entry level processor, but if there are too many programs running in the background, it can bog down quick. I would also recommend downloading and running Malwarebytes Anti-malware, to be sure that there is nothing malicous running in the background.
Qosmio X875 i7-3630QM, 32GB RAM, OCZ SSD Qosmio X505 i7-920XM, PM55, 16GB RAM, OCZ SSD
Satellite Pro L350 T9900, GM45, 8GB RAM , Intel 320 SSD (my baby) Satellite L655 i7-620M, HM55, 8GB RAM, Intel 710 SSD (travel system)

PKR crashing - high CPU usage (windows XP, bootcamp, Macbook Pro 2.5GHz)

The PKR (3D online poker) client is crashing - often half way through a game, frustratingly. I'm running Windows XP via Bootcamp and have updated to the latest Apple Bootcamp drivers. I notice very high CPU usage (consistently maxing out a core) at all times when running PKR. Anyone else having trouble with this software?

I've also been getting Kernel panics in OS X, so I took my MBP to the Apple Store in Regent St, London. They tested it and found a problem with the memory controller. After a logic board replacement the laptop is performing very well - no crashes so far in Windows or OS X. Fingers crossed.

High CPU Usage on Cisco 3845

Hi all,
I'm having high CPU usage with one of my Cisco 3845.
It works as an IP-IP Gateway and the CPU is quite high when the total number of calls only around 100-200 calls.
I check the CPU usage with "show process cpu sort" and it looks like there are some "hidden" processes that consuming CPU.
For example, 41% is total CPU, 25% is due to interrups, so CPU utilization on process level = 41 - 25 = 16%.
But as showed below, processes don't consume that much CPU, only around 7% ???
Please help to advise on this case. Any help is highly appreciated..
Thank you.
3845-GW#show process cpu sort | ex 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
CPU utilization for five seconds: 41%/25%; one minute: 46%; five minutes: 47%
PID Runtime(ms)     Invoked      uSecs     5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process
382     6619708     1473171       4493      1.59% 1.81% 1.92%   0 CCSIP_SPI_CONTRO
141     4228940    10181955        415      1.35% 1.51% 1.57%   0 IP Input
65     2450824      163102      15026        1.19% 1.16% 1.17%   0 Per-Second Jobs
370     2702292     3709512        728        0.87% 0.88% 0.88%   0 VOIP_RTCP
224      321680      245640       1309    0.47% 0.49% 0.50%   0 AFW_application_
112       93940    18093506          5             0.39% 0.31% 0.32%   0 Ethernet Msec Ti
384     1058280     1553567        681         0.23% 0.28% 0.30%   0 CCSIP_UDP_SOCKET
   2       18148       32905        551                 0.07% 0.03% 0.02%   0 Load Meter
137       35644     4657843          7               0.07% 0.04% 0.05%   0 IPAM Manager
189      206392      267959        770            0.07% 0.05% 0.07%   0 TCP Protocols
30       30792      198554        155               0.07% 0.01% 0.00%   0 ARP Input
368      145456      176151        825             0.07% 0.04% 0.05%   0 CC-API_VCM
28        9628       32759        293 0.00% 0.01% 0.00%   0 Environmental mo
48      221352       37922       5837 0.00% 0.11% 0.11%   0 Net Background
63       16728       32924        508 0.00% 0.01% 0.00%   0 Compute load avg
64       72080        2781      25918 0.00% 0.01% 0.00%   0 Per-minute Jobs
   6      371644       29792      12474 0.00% 0.14% 0.12%   0 Check heaps
176       12216      240288         50 0.00% 0.01% 0.00%   0 CEF: IPv4 proces
284       36416     4929826          7 0.00% 0.02% 0.01%   0 MMON MENG
307       12168      806151         15 0.00% 0.01% 0.00%   0 Atheros LED Ctro
335       35300       19755       1786 0.00% 3.16% 1.00% 708 Virtual Exec
3845-GW#sh int g0/0
GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full Duplex, 1Gbps, media type is RJ45
output flow-control is XON, input flow-control is XON
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/2/56803 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 1551000 bits/sec, 5751 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 4207000 bits/sec, 7643 packets/sec
     925128804 packets input, 939078510 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 62732 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 2 throttles
     2 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 2 overrun, 0 ignored
     0 watchdog, 3763438515 multicast, 0 pause input
     1472816545 packets output, 3214770103 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 2067720191 collisions, 1 interface resets
     0 unknown protocol drops
     0 babbles, 2281155551 late collision, 0 deferred
     2 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
3845-GW#sh int g0/1
GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full Duplex, 1Gbps, media type is RJ45
output flow-control is XON, input flow-control is XON
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/30335 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 1684000 bits/sec, 7697 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 3372000 bits/sec, 5632 packets/sec
     1484558664 packets input, 2383177786 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 208998 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     2 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 2 overrun, 0 ignored
     0 watchdog, 3060386282 multicast, 0 pause input
     903478941 packets output, 2814588854 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 2910776303 collisions, 1 interface resets
     0 unknown protocol drops
     0 babbles, 4157448025 late collision, 0 deferred
     2 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Has this been something that just recently started happening, or have you had this issue for a while? Have you installed any new programs recently?
You may want to download Glary Utilities, which is a free software(they will ask you if you want to go Pro, just say no, the free version works very well). There is a module for startup manager. You can go in and disable stuff that starts with the computer. I would advise unchecking adobe, java, quicktime, printers, etc. Anything that doesn't REALLY need to start with the computer. The nice thing with Glary is that you can restart the computer, and if you find that you need one of the programs to start with windows, you can go back in and enable it again.
The Celeron 925 processor in your computer is a decent entry level processor, but if there are too many programs running in the background, it can bog down quick. I would also recommend downloading and running Malwarebytes Anti-malware, to be sure that there is nothing malicous running in the background.
Qosmio X875 i7-3630QM, 32GB RAM, OCZ SSD Qosmio X505 i7-920XM, PM55, 16GB RAM, OCZ SSD
Satellite Pro L350 T9900, GM45, 8GB RAM , Intel 320 SSD (my baby) Satellite L655 i7-620M, HM55, 8GB RAM, Intel 710 SSD (travel system)

High CPU usage on IPS

Hi guys
I got a problem with an IPS, from some weeks the CPU has been at 100% (all the 4 CPU's) and I don't know why, the Inspection Load is really low and I guess this is not affecting to this. Here some information of the SHOW VERSION command
*I also attach some images of the IPS*
Cisco Intrusion Prevention System, Version 7.1(1)E4
Host:
Realm Keys key1.0
Signature Definition:
Signature Update S807.0 2014-06-13
OS Version: 2.6.29.1
Platform: ASA5585-SSP-IPS10
Using 4428M out of 5839M bytes of available memory (75% usage)
system is using 25.1M out of 160.0M bytes of available disk space (16% usage)
application-data is using 68.0M out of 171.6M bytes of available disk space (42% usage)
boot is using 56.0M out of 70.5M bytes of available disk space (84% usage)
application-log is using 494.0M out of 513.0M bytes of available disk space (96% usage)
I hope somebody had some idea what could be causing the high cpu usage.
Regards

Has this been something that just recently started happening, or have you had this issue for a while? Have you installed any new programs recently?
You may want to download Glary Utilities, which is a free software(they will ask you if you want to go Pro, just say no, the free version works very well). There is a module for startup manager. You can go in and disable stuff that starts with the computer. I would advise unchecking adobe, java, quicktime, printers, etc. Anything that doesn't REALLY need to start with the computer. The nice thing with Glary is that you can restart the computer, and if you find that you need one of the programs to start with windows, you can go back in and enable it again.
The Celeron 925 processor in your computer is a decent entry level processor, but if there are too many programs running in the background, it can bog down quick. I would also recommend downloading and running Malwarebytes Anti-malware, to be sure that there is nothing malicous running in the background.
Qosmio X875 i7-3630QM, 32GB RAM, OCZ SSD Qosmio X505 i7-920XM, PM55, 16GB RAM, OCZ SSD
Satellite Pro L350 T9900, GM45, 8GB RAM , Intel 320 SSD (my baby) Satellite L655 i7-620M, HM55, 8GB RAM, Intel 710 SSD (travel system)

High CPU Usage in Word 2013

Hi everyone,
I'm having an issue with Word 2013 and I'm hoping someone can help. Seen as I got fleeced for my TechNet subscription this year (the price given on the invoice doubled when I called up to pay!) I’d very much like to see a speedy fix from the Microsofties
please! :D
Recently, I've found that Word will consistently exhibit high CPU utilisation, ~50% on a dual core second generation Core i5.
This continues, even when I’m not providing any input to or interacting with the Word window and even when the Word window is covered by other windows. Minimising Word causes its CPU usage to drop back down to zero.
The strange thing is that, so far, I’ve only observed this with a single document. I started writing this document at the start of this week and it’s been authored exclusively on Word 2013. In fact I’m the only one who’s editing it and I’ve only used a single
computer (and this one single install of Word 2013) to do so…
There’s nothing particularly unusual about this document, and a different but similar document which uses the same themes and features (in fact the theme for the second document was created from the first one) doesn’t appear to cause the same issues. Both
these documents are stored on SkyDrive, and are being edited directly from there.
Initially I tried the much recommended tweaks of disabling hardware graphics acceleration and sub-pixel positioning, however neither of these has had any effect.
I investigated a bit further using Sysinternals Process Monitor, and found that while Word is using a lot of CPU it’s actually looping very, very quickly polling for the existence of the registry key “HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Avalon.Graphics”.
This key doesn’t exist on my system, and a quick test I conducted where I created it just lead to Word looping polling for more non-existent registry keys.
My system is a HP Folio 13 running Windows 8 Pro x64 with Office 2013 (RTM, not Beta) 32 bit. Both Windows and Office are fully patched, as is everything else on the system.
Thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer.
Chris

Hello again,
After working on my problematic document some more, I believe I’ve found the cause of the issue.
@Microsofties – I think this one is either a bug or a dodgy OOTB template…
I noticed that the high CPU usage only seemed to occur when the document’s footer was displayed. Experimenting with some careful scrolling and zooming to hide footer (without actually using the “hide white-space” option) seemed to confirm this so I investigated
the footer a bit more.
My document was using the standard Word “Facet (Odd Page)” footer template with a couple of fields added to suit my needs, namely “Publish Date” and a page number.
The template seems to be structured such that the content of the footer is inside two nested text boxes (one inside the other). I also noticed previously that this footer template also appears to “jump” up each page and back down again as I scrolled.
So I deleted the footer and its text boxes, and recreated the same content, in the same position (using the standard paragraph alignment tools) by hand without the nested text boxes. This has, so far, fixed the issue!
I also noticed that the CPU usage dropped right down to idle the moment I deleted the nested text boxes.
Altogether, this leads me to conclude that the “Facet (Odd Page)” footer template in Word 2013 is the source of my issue. Specifically, I believe that the use of nested text boxes in this template causes Word’s interactions with the .Net 4.5 WPF to go a
bit nuts, as evidenced by the infinite loop of request for the non-existent “Avalon.Graphics” WPF registry key I mentioned previously.
It would be nice to see some feedback on this one, Microsoft people, if only to know if this is actually a general issue or is specific to my document!
Thanks, Chris

High CPU usage warning, how to fix??

Hey all -- First off, my laptop is brand new, and it is a Satellite C875D - S7120, using Windows 8. So far so good, everything seems to be fine EXCEPT...I am an artist and I have a couple of 3D programs installed. But every time I try to use them I get a "High CPU usage" error, like the art program is taxing the computer too much. I'm not a gamer... it seems to me that simple 3D imagery wouldn't cause this. But how do I fix it? I'm not that computer savvy...I've heard about registry problems but wouldn't have a blind clue how to get in there and fix anything... PLEASE ADVISE! -- Thanks in advance, Krystal

Ahh, Jerry, you are a friend in (my) need...will pounce on this ASAP! Twiddling around with this new device of mine is a challenge but also a learning experience. Probably the most important thing right now is NOT getting it 3D-ready but instead, teaching myself how to manage the innards...
Moki, someone on deviantART who is very skilled w/ Blender has said that they don't like the latest version because it is quite different from earlier versions. I haven't done anything with it in yonks, so once I get into it again, that shouldn't bother me. But it's true, "improvements" always seem to just weigh a program (any program) down instead of making it easier to use. That was why I have preferred older versions of some things instead of what's new out there, as the older ones are slimmer and not such resource hogs...
Disabling RayTracing...hmm! I shall definitely do that...plus try all the many other tips! *bookmarks page* I could even try that on this old XP, since I have Blender installed here also.
So if Toshiba is strong enough to handle graphics projects way beyond my modest little ventures (I doubt I'll be making movies anytime soon!), I ought to be able to get this puppy set up for it without too much trouble....let us hope....

High CPU usage while buffering a video

I have a high CPU usage (over 40%) while only buffering this video.
IE10pre1
Firefox Nightly 20121229, protected mode enabled
Firefox Nightly 20121229, protected mode disabled
Opera Next
Chrome Canary
a) open this url: http://www.wimp.com/marsearth/
b) pause the video if it starts automatically
c) use task manager or process explorer to view the cpu/gpu usage
reproducible: mostly
Windows 7 SP1
Flash Player 11.6.602.108 / HWA enabled
TestPC: Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro; AMD Athlon 64 Venice 3200+; 2x 1GB MDT DDR-400-CL2; Club3D HD4670 AGP; Samsung HD103SJ, SyncMaster 204BM

While we're aware of the issue, there's not much we can do about it. The modern security realities facing web browsers have made sandboxing a necessity.
There's a good explanation of what's happening here: http://blogs.adobe.com/asset/2012/06/inside-flash-player-protected-mode-for-firefox.html
Long story short, each video packet has to be passed from the browser to a medium-integrity broker process, then to the low-integrity flash player process for rendering. If an attacker manages to hijack the Flash Player thread, the process is low-integrity, which prevents the attacker from doing much with it. While it's not an absolute guarantee (nothing in security is), it raises the bar significantly for attackers.
The downside is that all of that extra message-passing consumes CPU cycles, especially if you're trying to fill an exceptionally large buffer as fast as possible. There's not a lot of opportunity to optimize this.
If you're fine with the risk, you can manually disable ProtectedMode on your machine. If you're only dealing with trusted sites, and you're not doing anything critical with the machine (work, banking, etc), then it's probably not a huge deal.
Ultimately, ProtectedMode is like a vaccine -- it's a herd-immunity thing. If the majority of people run it, exploits targeting machines without it are inconsistent and probably not worth pursuing when you look at the effort involved in developing an end-to-end exploit. If a large number of people disable it, it becomes economically attractive for people building botnets, and you'll have a problem if you're not using it.
To disable Protected Mode, add the following line to your mms.cfg file located in:
Windows 32bit: C:\windows\system32\macromed\flash
Windows 64bit: C:\windows\syswow64\macromed\flash
ProtectedMode=0
If the mms.cfg file does not exist, create one using any standard text editor (e.g.. notepad)
Depending on your operating system, you might need to first save the mms.cfg file to a writable location (such as your documents or desktop folder) and then copy the file into the destination folder using Windows Explorer.
To re-enable Protected Mode, simply remove the line from the mms.cfg file.

Microsoft Office 2004 -- extremely high cpu usage and virtual ram

hi,
when i use office it causes a very high cpu usage even when its in idle mode.
i am unable to work with it, because its extremely slow.
does anyone have same experiences?
thanks for your help!
mbp 2.0 1,5gb ram 80gb hdd Mac OS X (10.4.7)

I am able to work OK with office, I'm using the 'old version' Microsoft Office v.X, not much details in the About Box, just listed as MSoft Word/Excel/etc for Mac service release 1.
I get the occasional crash, and I have seen Word in particular use 90% of a single core and amazingly large virtual memory usage, gigabytes sometimes, but eventually the document gets printed.
It shows how useful the dual core (or quad) cpu approach is!
One cpu for Word to print, and one cpu to run the rest of my applications/life!
I still use this old office rather than re-booting into Window§ for whatever is the latest version of office.
Doing some playing with a similar one page document in Office v.X and Pages 2.01, I get Word using about 25% of a core , Pages using 5%, - whilst editing; Intel native Pages has 20% of a core and 80MB ram 480 virtual whilst printing, Word has about 100% of a core and 65MB ram 650 virtual whilst printing, but it is a powerPC code so Rosetta is in there somewhere.
check Activity Monitor or other apps/widgets for some parasitic processes? have fun!
many Macs 512k -> MacBool Pro 2GHz 1GB ram Mac OS X (10.4.7) Yes, I have Key Lime

Kernel_task high CPU usage yosemite

Hi,
I have a problem with my old macbook pro 15" Early 2011
The battery was dead so I bought a new one and replaced it. I also installed a new Samsung SSD.
Then after the startup (OSX Mavericks was installed) I had a high CPU usage on the kernel_task process.
After some research i managed to get rid of the problem with manipulating the IOPlatformPluginFamily.kext files.
After that everything worked fine.
Now I decided to upgrade to Yosemite (clean install from usb) and now i have the same problem again, but i can't find the IOPlatformPluginFamily.kext.
After I power up the macbook everything works fine, but after some minutes the kernel_task has again a very high CPU usage - the mouse is hardly moving.
How can I solve this problem and where do I find the IOPlatformPluginFamily.kext? Is there another solution for this problem?
I already reset the SMC and the NVRAM.
thank you
Hans

Hi,
I have a problem with my old macbook pro 15" Early 2011
The battery was dead so I bought a new one and replaced it. I also installed a new Samsung SSD.
Then after the startup (OSX Mavericks was installed) I had a high CPU usage on the kernel_task process.
After some research i managed to get rid of the problem with manipulating the IOPlatformPluginFamily.kext files.
After that everything worked fine.
Now I decided to upgrade to Yosemite (clean install from usb) and now i have the same problem again, but i can't find the IOPlatformPluginFamily.kext.
After I power up the macbook everything works fine, but after some minutes the kernel_task has again a very high CPU usage - the mouse is hardly moving.
How can I solve this problem and where do I find the IOPlatformPluginFamily.kext? Is there another solution for this problem?
I already reset the SMC and the NVRAM.
thank you
Hans

High CPU usage on OS X 10.9.4

So I have high CPU usage of 50-70% and in safe mode goes away, however when I disable all extensions and set add-ons to "ask to activate" it shoots high when not in safe mode, I disabled themes and everything. I am at my wits end as my Macbook Pro has a Core i5 and 16GB of DDR3 RAM, with a 750GB SSD Hard drive, the hardware is perfectly fine, and firefox is the issue. I may have multiple tabs open a lot but even with 1 or 2 tabs it shoots to an average of 40-50% and as high as 140%

If it works in Safe Mode and in normal mode with all extensions (Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) disabled then try to find which extension is causing it by enabling one extension at a time until the problem reappears.
Close and restart Firefox after each change via "Firefox > Exit" (Windows: Firefox/File > Exit; Mac: Firefox > Quit Firefox; Linux: Firefox/File > Quit)
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

High CPU usage in cisco 7613 with rsp720-3cxl

Hi everybody,
our cisco 7613 has about 4.5 Gbps Tx/Rx IP traffic in total, and we run ospf with other cisco cloud for routing I list in the following some our router show.what is your idea about our high cpu usage .Is it in normal range with the listed cards and modules.How can I tune the rsp720 and other SIP-200,400,600 for better performances
why our interrupt rate is high ,and one thing more the total sum of 5sec in separate rows not equal to cpu utilization for five second 50%
show proc cpu sor
CPU utilization for five seconds: 50%/46%; one minute: 54%; five minutes: 59%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
8 196795220 12640741 15568 1.51% 0.38% 0.26% 0 Check heaps
224 1048610528 4169501364 0 1.19% 1.45% 1.44% 0 IP Input
13 374006320 3155162661 0 0.23% 0.26% 0.24% 0 ARP Input
217 119862004 985030884 121 0.15% 0.32% 0.25% 0 ADJ resolve pro
c
185 537716 1825736183 0 0.07% 0.03% 0.02% 0 ACE Tunnel Task
260 1550992 2983272818 0 0.07% 0.13% 0.15% 0 Ethernet Msec T
i
305 38186336 58050485 657 0.07% 0.02% 0.00% 0 XDR mcast
34 67208 11707798 5 0.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0 IPC Loadometer
27 232776 57160812 4 0.07% 0.01% 0.00% 0 IPC Periodic Ti
m
325 17539200 92894502 188 0.07% 0.15% 0.15% 0 CEF: IPv4 proce
s
195 7406636 43782487 169 0.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0 esw_vlan_stat_p
r
show ip route summ
IP routing table name is default (0x0)
IP routing table maximum-paths is 32
Route Source Networks Subnets Replicates Overhead Memory (bytes)
static 1 120 0 7620 20812
connected 0 313 0 18860 53836
ospf 98 17 4892 0 589020 863984
Intra-area: 89 Inter-area: 383 External-1: 0 External-2: 0
NSSA External-1: 0 NSSA External-2: 4437
bgp 12880 0 1 0 60 172
External: 1 Internal: 0 Local: 0
ospf 410 0 269 0 16220 47344
Intra-area: 1 Inter-area: 0 External-1: 0 External-2: 268
NSSA External-1: 0 NSSA External-2: 0
internal 137 260544
Total 155 5595 0 631780 1246692
sh module
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
1 0 4-subslot SPA Interface Processor-200 7600-SIP-200
2 0 4-subslot SPA Interface Processor-400 7600-SIP-400
3 24 CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6724-SFP
6 1 1-subslot SPA Interface Processor-600 7600-SIP-600
7 2 Route Switch Processor 720 (Active) RSP720-3CXL-GE
8 2 Route Switch Processor 720 (Cold) RSP720-3CXL-GE
show ver
System image file is "bootdisk:c7600rsp72043-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SRE2.bin"
1 SIP-200 controller .
1 SIP-400 controller (1 Channelized OC3/STM-1).
1 SIP-600 controller (1 TenGigabitEthernet).
2 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
28 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
1 Ten Gigabit Ethernet interface
1 Channelized STM-1 port
1 Channelized STM-1 port
show int vlan 1
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive not supported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 2d23h
Input queue: 0/75/2886/1830 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 2380531000 bits/sec, 287383 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 422133000 bits/sec, 254113 packets/sec
L2 Switched: ucast: 1200869468 pkt, 101172643240 bytes - mcast: 253599 pkt, 78
873415 bytes
L3 in Switched: ucast: 60947040633 pkt, 68919665115039 bytes - mcast: 0 pkt, 0
bytes mcast
L3 out Switched: ucast: 52594517004 pkt, 9869168832783 bytes mcast: 0 pkt, 0 b
ytes
62147839148 packets input, 69016175499764 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 257634 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 15 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
53647248858 packets output, 10292998021217 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 interface resets
0 unknown protocol drops
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Thank you for your hints and replying
These are our show ibc in 1 min interval
Interface information:
Interface IBC0/0
5 minute rx rate 20045000 bits/sec, 30183 packets/sec
5 minute tx rate 47394000 bits/sec, 60212 packets/sec
19879272237 packets input, 4006174536193 bytes
19835355282 broadcasts received
19808585787 packets output, 3981305571968 bytes
90548 broadcasts sent
0 Bridge Packet loopback drops
19756362091 Packets CEF Switched, 1320184 Packets Fast Switched
0 Packets SLB Switched, 0 Packets CWAN Switched
Label switched pkts dropped: 0 Pkts dropped during dma: 339549
Invalid pkts dropped: 0 Pkts dropped(not cwan consumed): 0
IPSEC pkts dropped: 635184
Xconnect pkts processed: 0, dropped: 0
Xconnect pkt reflection drops: 0
Total paks copied for process level 0
Total short paks sent in route cache 2605317676
Total throttle drops 265338 Input queue drops 5831090
total spd packets classified (120217214 low, 174503 medium, 3073 high)
total spd packets dropped (339549 low, 0 medium, 0 high)
spd prio pkts allowed in due to selective throttling (0 med, 0 high)
IBC resets = 1; last at 23:52:49.004 Sat Jan 19 2013
Driver Level Counters: (Cumulative, Zeroed only at Reset)
Frames Bytes
Rx(0) 26537712 3421085217
Rx(1) 3449063135 2838813650
Tx(0) 3390340306 2016620276
Input Drop Frame Count
Rx0 = 0 Rx1 = 2488435
Per Queue Receive Errors:
FRME OFLW BUFE NOENP DISCRD DISABLE BADCOUNT
Rx0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rx1 0 0 0 3633 0 0 0
Tx Errors/State:
One Collision Error = 0 More Collisions = 0
No Encap Error = 0 Deferred Error = 0
Loss Carrier Error = 0 Late Collision Error = 0
Excessive Collisions = 0 Buffer Error = 0
Tx Freeze Count = 0 Tx Intrpt Serv timeout= 1
Tx Flow State = FLOW_ON
Tx Flow Off Count = 0 Tx Flow On Count = 0
Counters collected at Idb:
Is input throttled = 0 Throttle Count = 0
Rx Resource Errors = 0 Input Drops = 2488435
Input Errors = 194243
Output Drops = 0 Giants/Runts = 0/0
Dma Mem Error = 0 Input Overrun = 0
Hash match table for multicast (in use 0, maximum 64 entries):
show ibc
Interface information:
Interface IBC0/0
5 minute rx rate 20194000 bits/sec, 30412 packets/sec
5 minute tx rate 47753000 bits/sec, 60663 packets/sec
19891125514 packets input, 4007158118761 bytes
19847185365 broadcasts received
19820407164 packets output, 3982279276274 bytes
90576 broadcasts sent
0 Bridge Packet loopback drops
19768178233 Packets CEF Switched, 1321008 Packets Fast Switched
0 Packets SLB Switched, 0 Packets CWAN Switched
Label switched pkts dropped: 0 Pkts dropped during dma: 339549
Invalid pkts dropped: 0 Pkts dropped(not cwan consumed): 0
IPSEC pkts dropped: 635574
Xconnect pkts processed: 0, dropped: 0
Xconnect pkt reflection drops: 0
Total paks copied for process level 0
Total short paks sent in route cache 2606549061
Total throttle drops 265338 Input queue drops 5831090
total spd packets classified (120252754 low, 174531 medium, 3074 high)
total spd packets dropped (339549 low, 0 medium, 0 high)
spd prio pkts allowed in due to selective throttling (0 med, 0 high)
IBC resets = 1; last at 23:52:49.004 Sat Jan 19 2013
Driver Level Counters: (Cumulative, Zeroed only at Reset)
Frames Bytes
Rx(0) 26550723 3422835145
Rx(1) 3461063605 176652699
Tx(0) 3402319442 3368513724
Input Drop Frame Count
Rx0 = 0 Rx1 = 2490155
Per Queue Receive Errors:
FRME OFLW BUFE NOENP DISCRD DISABLE BADCOUNT
Rx0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rx1 0 0 0 3633 0 0 0
Tx Errors/State:
One Collision Error = 0 More Collisions = 0
No Encap Error = 0 Deferred Error = 0
Loss Carrier Error = 0 Late Collision Error = 0
Excessive Collisions = 0 Buffer Error = 0
Tx Freeze Count = 0 Tx Intrpt Serv timeout= 1
Tx Flow State = FLOW_ON
Tx Flow Off Count = 0 Tx Flow On Count = 0
Counters collected at Idb:
Is input throttled = 0 Throttle Count = 0
Rx Resource Errors = 0 Input Drops = 2490155
Input Errors = 194358
Output Drops = 0 Giants/Runts = 0/0
Dma Mem Error = 0 Input Overrun = 0
Hash match table for multicast (in use 0, maximum 64 entries):
and sorry what is your idea about total sum of 5sec in separate rows not equal to cpu utilization for five second 50%

Database file + high cpu usage

this has only started happening since i formatted and reinstalled windows. i have tried using both itunes 6.0.2.23 and 6.0.4.2 and both have the same problem.
my music library contains 5088 songs, i have tried deleting heaps down to around 3400 and problem is still there (ie i have eliminated number of songs as a factor cause before formatting i had more than 3400 but less than 5088)
when i play a song in itunes after about 5 seconds my cpu usage will jump to 100% this is on the "system" process, itunes itself uses around 2-5%. i was watching the itunes music folder though, and what it is doing is creating a new temp file (of 7.27mb) then renaming it to replace the current "itunes music library.xml" file. as soon as the xml file is replaced (takes about 10 seconds) cpu usage returns to normal.
this exact same thing happens when i quit itunes, although it takes roughly 20 seconds.
i have tried deleting all files in the itunes music folder apart from the base database file, that did nothing.
i tried removing the entire folder and letting it create a new blank library, then added just 1 album, and it worked perfectly. i also noticed that on my original library most but not all AAC encoded files did not cause the cpu spike, all mp3s did.
i tried creating an entire blank library and adding all my music back in, it still did high cpu usage so i would assume my current database is not corrupted.
does anyone know a solution to this? how to stop it recreating the xml file with every song played. the only thing important to me is saving my playcounts, so any solution which does not require losing them would be appreciated.
also yes i have tried completely uninstalling itunes, for both of the versions mentioned above, also tried updating over the top of the current installation, problem occurs everytime.
i am running service pack 2, all current windows updates installed, no spyware, no viruses.
thanks.
Windows XP Pro Athlon 64 3000+, 1GB DDR Ram

It may be iTunes, but it probably is not. iTunes is just affected by a conflict with another program (possibly).
Do you have a spy sweeper/virus scanner/etc. that periodically scans your PC memory? If so, then that is what may be interacting with iTunes.
You should list the iTunes Folders as part of the exclusions within your Virus Scanners, and other Security software.
BTW: I have a Library with over 13,000 song references. I do not see the same CPU spikes when playing music. It's not the size of the database - not at your current level.

MSI KT6 Delta LSR SATA to PATA High CPU Usage Problem

Well recently I've switch to my one of my other motherboards on my network to a MSI KT6 Delta LSR, it was working fine after a reformat, but I notice a few problems and that is 100% cpu usage for SATA to PATA, and vice versa, which seems really crazy. Then my network card performance is ISDN speed sluggish, and I tested my line to be working 100% with another mobo. But when I put another NIC on the same mobo it suffers the same speed problems.
Any suggestions? The rig is specs:
Barton 2500+
Antec QuietPower 350W
200GB Seagate SATA HDD
40GB Seagate PATA HDD
ATI Radeon 7500 AIW
Audigy 2 Value
Realtek 8139 NIC
MSI KT6 Delta LSR Mobo
2x512 MB PC 2700 RAM
Pioneer 107D DVD Writer
LG 16X DVD-ROM
56K Modem (A-open)

Shouldn't say what I don't know about SATA, but since I found below, I need ask if VIA 4in1 drivers are installed, preferably while in SafeMode I say:
http://www.google.se/search?q=cache:X6ewgPiIHYcJ:www.qdi.nl/cgi-bin/bbs/YaBB.pl%3Fboard%3DP4I865%3Baction%3Ddisplay%3Bnum%3D1074174096+sata+to+pata+cpu+usage&hl=sv
I recently installed 160g Seagate barracuda 7200.7 drive on SATA port. (I enabled the Bios using Auto) I have a P4I865pea-6al mother board, with two PATA drives . When copying files between the PATA drives on ide ports, to or from, the SATA drive, I notice the CPU usage goes up to 100%, but when copying files from one ide drive (the PATA drives) to another the CPU usage is very low.
Is there a bios setting that will allow me to copy files from the SATA drive to the Pata drives using a small amount of CPU power, found when just copying between the Primary and Secondary IDE drives? I am using Adobe premiere pro, which uses a lot of CPU power, and the high CPU usage of the SATA drive crashes this program? Any help would be appreciated
Re: CPU usage with SATA drive?
« Reply #1 on: Oct 30th, 2004, 7:17pm » Quote Modify
have you installed the newest chipset- and ide drivers ?

Screen Sharing freezing and high CPU usage

Hello all,
I use screen sharing to remote my mac mini as a media server connected to ma HD TV to play movies, music and surf.
Since I upgrade to mavericks on my macs (Macbook Pro Retina and my Mac Mini) I have some troubles with the screen sharing feature.
No problems with the login step, the connexion is fast, all permissions are OK (I saw there were a bug with some RDP release) but sometimes, when I use fullscreen software as VLC, Firefox, etc (not the native apple full screen feature, I just clic on the + at the top of the window), my sreen sharing freeze and I can't do or move anything on the remoted mac mini. I'm unable to close (or reduce) the screen sharing app too, it's totaly busy (But I can see the movie or the website on the 2 computer, there is no deconnection)... I have to kill the process through the monitoring activity.
During the freezing time, I try to use vnc light from my Iphone and I have no problem, I can move the mouse, reduce le VLC windows... As soon I reduce the VLC windows, the screen sharing works again. I also use the logitech TouchMouse to remote the mouse, everything work fine.
Here are a screen shot of the monitoring activity of the Mac running the screen sharing app, we can see that there is a very high CPU usage when I use VLC in fullscreen on my mac mini. The first is in normal mode. The second is in freeze mode. Screen Sharing is named "Partage d'écran".
Can someone help me to fix that, everything works fine with Mountain Lion.

I have a Macbook Pro 13.5" 2.8 GHz 4 core (2 real, 2 hyperthreaded) i7 machine running with 1920X1200 display, 3 virtual screens and VMWare adding a few virtual screens (full sized). I have another Macbook Pro 15" with 2.6 GHz Haswell 8 core (4 real, 4 hyperthreaded). I see the problem using Screen Sharing on the 15 inch (Retina screen) mode simulating 1920 X 1200 pixels using Screen Sharing to the 13.5" Macbook Pro.
When I get the ScreenSharing problem, I have identified it as related to the VMWare screen on the 13.5" Macbook Pro being shown through Screen Sharing on the Retina Screen. Before you conclude it is a VMWare problem, the computations are only on the Screen Sharing client side, not on the server side running VMWare. The mouse gets unusable through Screen Sharing. If I physically move the mouse on the 13.5" Macbook, no problem. If I switch virtual screens, the Screen Sharing goes to normal processing.
I see an appearance of a compute-bound thread on the Screen Sharing client. It takes 100% CPU on one thread, the machine as a whole is 12.5% busy (the performance monitor considers all 8 threads as equal when in fact, they are not).
A few more pieces of information. The VMWare client ends up having a lot of overlapping windows with a lot of changing graphics. My mouse runs into problems especially when it is overlaying a changing plot (Perfmon running in Windows 7, or updating email client). It does turn out that VMWare has a "native" VNC server built-in and I tried to connect to the virtual screen using the Screen Sharing Client on the machine with computing problem and voila!, no problem. I end up having a Screen Sharing Client running native running screen (supposed to be VNC, but I have not verified that) sharing protocol on a virtual screen that is NOT the VMWare virtual screen and a separate session using actual VNC protocol using the VMWare VNC server. It works perfectly fine.
If I may hazard a guess, I think I know what the bug is, or at least, what is the nature of the problem that I have. The rest of you may have a different bug. When I have difficulty, it is because I am on a window that suppresses the dock, both in remote virtual screen and on the local machine showing the screen. Two docks are suppressed, one remote, one local. Throw in overlapping windows with changing graphics in the overlapped windows and toss in a mouse on top of that. I think that the Screen Sharing is trying to refresh overlapping windows with mouse and going through the suppressed dock calculations and never converging on what the picture should be. The mouse ends up being the visible cue that shows the time frame for iterating the windows - flickers with a timeframe of greater than a second. That is far greater than the screen update time. It is totally compute bound with all the overlapping stuff that it is deconflicting. At least, that is what I think is going on.
Meanwhile, the VMWare VNC server appears to send out a single graphics context and causes the Screen Sharing client to converge to a picture. Note, the mouse appearance is very different when attaching to the VMWare VNC Server rather than the ScreenSharing native server. I see two mouse renderings, the virtual machine remote and a mouse rendering from my Screen Sharing client side. They are mostly in sync in position unless I move the mouse very quickly. If I use Screen Sharing client and server instead, I usually see only one mouse, the client side's mouse rendering.
I have a solution for my problem. It is similar to using a different VNC server/client pairing. I will use a VNC server for the systems giving me trouble that is not Screen Sharing Server exercising a probable bug in the Client (though, it could be a problem in the design of Screen Sharing itself).

High CPU Usage - Satellite Pro L450 EZ-1510

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for