High ISO a6000 RAW Not Supported?

I took the same photo with my Sony a6000 at every ISO interval, then sorted them by ISO value in Aperture and learned every RAW I took above ISO 1250 returned an "Unsupported Image Format" error. This is a problem because I'm a concert photographer and much of my work is in low-light. What is breaking, my camera, or Aperture? How does one fix this? Am I the only one experiencing this issue?

I have just found a solution (at least for me) in another thread:
RAW files suddenly show up as "not supported" (Aperture 3.5.1, OS X 10.10)
Hope this helps you too
The instructions in the other thread mention RAW support version 5.06 specifically, but I tried with the latest (5.07) and that worked fine.

Similar Messages

  • Panasonic tz60 raw not supported in Aperture 3. How to fix?

    can anyone help me?

    panasonic tz60 raw not supported in Aperture 3. How to fix?
    Aperture's raw support is camera specific. The list of currently supported cameras is here:
    Apple - Aperture - Technical Specifications - RAW Support
    Apple focusses on cameras, that are most likely used by professionals. Your camera is an excellent camera, and I wish I had it, but so far none of the cameras in the Panasonic Lumix tz-family have been supported in Aperture.  So send feedback to Apple, that you want this camera to be supported.  You can use this form for a feature request:  Apple - Aperture - Feedback
    To be able to use your raw files in Aperture, you could try a few work-arounds:
    Use the software, that came with your camera, to convert the files to another lossless format, eg. TIFF.
    Or do, what I am doing with the raws from my Lumix FZ28 - download the free Adobe DNG converter and convert your RAWS to DNG format:  Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh, I don't know, if that will work for your tz60 files, but give it a try.
    If you have hopes, that Apple will support the camera soon, shoot RAW&JPEG for the time being, and work with the JPEGs, until hopefully the raw support will be released.
    -- Léonie

  • Hyper-v cannot boot Gen2 guest from Windows 2012 R2 or Windows 8.1 x64 ISO - file format not supported, Gen1 works fine

    I am new to Gen2 Hyper-V and so far I simply can't use it, because I am unable to install any (supported) guest OS from an ISO ...
    So far I tried that on:
    1. my HP Z230/i4770 workstation (Secure Boot disabled) host running Windows 8.1 Pro x64 (with Hyper-V feature enabled), can't boot any VM with supported OS ISO.
    2. my home desktop/i3770K (secure Boot enabled) host running Windows 8.1 Pro x64, same result, error during VM boot from ISO, quoted below.
    Synthetic SCSI controller (instance blah blah) Failed to Power on with Error 'The version does not support this version of file format'
    Gen1 guests of course work perfectly fine with those ISOs, because emulated DVD IDE picks up the official Enterprise Evaluation ISO of either Windows Server 2012 R2 or Windows 8.1 x64 Enterprise, perfectly fine and all works OK in Legacy boot mode.
    When I create a new guest and select Gen2, then no matter if I check or uncheck the Secure Boot in virtual Boot Order options for the guest (while setting the SCSI DVD at top of course), it simply doesn't work, always same error. I tried first connecting
    to VM to see if it prompts for key press, but it doesn't, the error is instant on Power on when (supported) ISO image is selected to be booted.
    I verified that both of official Enterprise Evaluation ISO's of either WS2012r2 and W8.1x64 are bootable in both the UEFI mode (Secure Boot enabled) and Legacy BIOS mode using a physical computer.
    What am I missing here???

    FYI, above is wrong! it's not about linking ISO to virtual DVD or selecting "Install OS later", it's all about the location of the ISO file and share permissions on parent folder!
    I was actually suspecting several issues, but haven't had time to test it, was thinking about issues like assigning (or not) some of initial settings during Gen2 VM creation, e.g.:
    -Network connection through virtual switch or Not Connected (make no different if assigned or not)
    -Memory above 4096MB (makes no difference if < or > 4096MB)
    -ISO file location (makes huge difference!)
    The ISO file CANNOT be placed on network share OR in shared folder on same local drive as the VHDX file (works fine if parent folder is not shared).
    I can now replicate the issue easily every time and it always fails with file format unsupported message whenever I have the ISO file located either on remote network share, or (fails the same way too) when I have the ISO file placed locally (on host drive)
    when simply a parent folder is shared... must be some permissions issue... and a pretty dumb one considering that in production environments nearly everything is placed on remote file servers ...
    ... so the moral of the story is, if you want to install Gen2 VM in win8/2012 hyper-V then you must copy the ISO file to Hyper-V host drive AND make sure the parent folder is not shared. works every time now! :)

  • Elements 11 Camera Raw not supporting new Canon EOS 7D MkII.

    When I try to open a Raw file from my new camera I get the message
    'Could not complete your request because the file appears to be from a camera model which is not supported by the installed version of Camera Raw. Please visit the Camera Raw help documents for additional information'
    I've updated my Elements 11 and restarted the computer (Windows 7), but the problem persists.
    Any solutions?
    I could open the file with Canon software (DPP) and transfer it to elements, but I'd sooner not - it's a rather clunky process.@

    Hi,
    I think that Adobe do the best job they can. Adobe aren't treated any different from you or I by the camera manufacturers - they don't get any privileged information - they have to wait until they can get their hands on a camera the same as you or I.
    If you want to blame someone then direct your blame on the camera manufacturers. If their raw files were written in DNG format then there would not be any problems or delays.
    Just think, if nobody bought the new cameras for two months after they were being shipped, the camera manufacturers might change their attitude and cooperate with Adobe.
    I don't think it will be too long before and update is released by Adobe. In the meantime, you can use the Canon DPP to convert the raw files or shoot in JPG to get familiar with the controls and settings.
    Brian

  • New Sony NEX-F3K - RAW not supported?

    I JUST bought a brand new Sony NEX-F3K thinking that the .ARW format would be compatible (Apple lists the NEX family .ARW format as compatible).  Has anyone else found that this format is not supported?  I just want to make sure I'm not missing something.

    .ARW is not a format.  It's a family of formats.  RAW files are goofy this way.
    If the camera is not expliclitly listed on the Aperture page (by name), it's not supported and likely won't work.
    If you want to know if or when it will be supported, that's something nobody here can answer.  Apple doesn't release any information like that, despite many people here asking ;-)

  • Just bought Fuji HS50EXR.  Raw not supported?

    I just bought a Fuji HS50EXR and when I wanted to open in Raw Photoshop said It was not supported in CS 5.  Can I get a  plugin?

    You can use the free Adobe DNG Converter 8.1 to convert your raw files to DNGs that an older Camera Raw plug-in from CS5 will understand, OR starting Monday you can pay $20/month for a single-app subscription and choose Photoshop-CC as that single app and use PS-CC and ACR 8.1 to open your raw files.  PS-CS6 will also host ACR 8.1 to open those files, but I don’t know if you can find a link to buy it with so close to the roll-out of Adobe’s monthly-only pricing for PS going forward.  Until the end of July your purchase of PS-CC or another app will only cost $10/month fro the first year, but then go up to $20/month if you renew for another year.
    You could also get a limited version of CR 7.4, that only allows toning, noise-reduction, camera-profile selection, if you get Photoshop Elements, or you can buy Lightroom 5 and get all the features in ACR and them some, and use Edit in PS CS5 to do any final edits.
    PS-CC:  http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop.html
    LR5:  http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-lightroom.html
    DNG Converter:  http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2.html#downloads

  • High Res Icon - iPad3 ( not supported yet ? )

    I'm trying to include the following to my app XML to allow for the x2 icon for iPad3
    <icon>
            <image144x144>assets/[email protected]</image144x144
            <image72x72>assets/icon72.png</image72x72>
            <image48x48>assets/icon48.png</image48x48>
    </icon>
    I get the following error.
    application.icon.image144x144 is an unexpected element/attribute
    Do I have the node name wrong ?

    Support for high resolution icons(144x144)  does not exist with AIR 3.2. However, it will definetly be supported in the next release of AIR.
    You can learn more about the next AIR mobile and desktop features by applying for our private prerelease program. By doing so, you'll get to know the features of the upcoming release in advance!

  • Canon 5D MarkII Raw not supported now?

    I have been using LR for several years and suddenly today it's saying that the raw file isn't supported.  I've never had that problem before.  I can see the image thumbnails on the import screen when I"m setting up the subfolder I want to save it to, but then during the import I get this message.  I thought maybe I needed to update my software, but it says it is up-to-date.  Help??

    Since I import hundreds of 5D2 CR2 files almost every day, I can testify that they continue to be supported. Incidently, Canon Raw files are compressed but that is not something that could be changed accidently. Moreover, sRaw1 and sRaw2 files are fully supported. I would suggest that your files are being corrupted on the way from the camera to LR and being made unrecognizable. The culprit could be the camera, faulty usb cable(s), a card reader, a usb hub or a usb portal on your computer, or a hard drive that is on the verge of failing. You will have to do some detective work, eliminating variables until you catch the perp.

  • Sigma Raw not supported?

    Hey,
    Any idea if there will be coming the time for Sigma RAW means .x3f support in some "pro" future?
    Well...
    Hope dies at the end.

    Here is not the place to tell Apple this. You are talking to other users just like yourself here.
    Instead send your request to
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/aperture.html
    Allan

  • A6000 - Font not supporting Indic languages like Tamil

    A6000 - If I open a webpage which is at tamil unicode, it is rendered with plentry of junk characters. It is the case with all the browsers, Chrome, Firefox, Opera, UC Browser. Same issue on my friend's A6000. So it is confirmed, it is not a browser issue. I checked the same webpages on motorola and micromax mobiles. They are rendering perfect. Lenovo has to fix the issue.

    i don't have any solution at this point of time.. will post if i find one....
    but i don't seem to have issue in reading the tamil pages with the current issue since only particular set of characters are having issue and mind can easily get adjusted to it

  • New Camera Profiles and very high ISO files

    I am having some difficulty directing this 'beta' comment as there no longer seems to be a Labs forum for the new Profiles. My apologies, if necessary, for therefore intruding on a user-to-user.
    Also, to add to my misdemeanours, I previously posted the following (slightly amended here) in the LR forum - which again may be not the ideal place.
    "I have been really impressed with the camera profiles - in my case the Standard NEF for a D3 - and posted a complimentary message to that effect on the Labs LR beta2 forum under the pseudonym Rockshead.
    The revelation that each profile is camera specific raises a particular question about that for the D3. Whilst the conversions at 'normal' ISO ratings are - as I said - stunning; the same cannot be said of those for the very high ISO numbers available with the D3; compared to the conversion of the same in View/CaptureNX. Applying LR noise reduction - by the bucket load - cerrtainly aids the definition, but has little effect on the colour differences.
    I suppose my question is, is this something that we have to live with; or is there hope for the future that this will be able to be sorted by further tweak of the profiles. I can quite understand if this is element of the conversion is another ingredient of Nikon's secret sauce, and therefore outside of Adobe's future thinking? Nevertheless, it would be interesting to know the thinking.
    Let me hasten to say, I am content to live with it for the relatively few ultra high ISO pictures I deal with. No complaints at all from me on the brilliant way Adobe has tackled the camera profile upgrade. Nevertheless, regular use of high ISOs is coming, and so it is a legitimate question,"

    > Whilst the conversions at 'normal' ISO ratings are - as I said - stunning; the same cannot be said of those for the very high ISO numbers available with the D3; compared to the conversion of the same in View/CaptureNX. Applying LR noise reduction - by the bucket load - cerrtainly aids the definition, but has little effect on the colour differences
    1. Can if you can provide a documentation for such color differences in form of a raw file and pointing out some differences caused by the conversion?
    2. "Very high ISO numbers" is not very specific. I wonder if you are aware of the fact, that your camera's highest real ISO setting is 6400. The settings 12800 and 25600 are eye-wash, meant only for those creating JPEG in-camera.

  • Why do these N series phone NOT support flash wall...

    Hello- I am curious as to why these apparently "high end" handsets do not support something as simple as flash (.swf) wallpaper ??
    I love the N85 and was hoping to buy one but I then found out that it (among others) does not support flash wallpapers.
    I am wondering if this is a compatibility issue with Symbian ??
    Does anyone know why this is ??
    Now before anyone says anything I am referring to flash wallpapers, NOT screensavers, these handsets do support flash screensavers but NOT wallpapers !!
    Thank You, LL-

    lamplighter wrote:
    If they do it for the S40's then why not the S60's ??
    The S40 software and S40 devices are done by a different organization/team in Nokia than the S60 software and S60 devices.
    Different organizations have different priorities, different resources, different goals.
    There's nothing technically that prevents it from being done. And it is possible that some day it will also be supported in S60 based devices.
    However, as things are now, S60 based devices do not support Flash [Lite] wallpapers.
    I haven't seen any user-installable applications that'd enable such a function, either. I suspect it is next to impossible to write such an application anyway, without the support being part of the S60/Symbian operating system.

  • I have Photoshop Elements 9. I downloaded the plug in 6.0 and it works on the RAW files from Canon EOS 60D, but not with Canon EOS 70D. I cannot download higher versions of plug in, because I have Windows Vista and it is not supported.

    I have Photoshop Elements 9. I downloaded the plug in 6.0 and it works on the RAW files from Canon EOS 60D, but not with Canon EOS 70D. I cannot download higher versions of plug in, because I have Windows Vista and it is not supported.

    You could try using the DNG converter 8.7 on Windows vista:
    <Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Windows : Adobe DNG Converter 8.7>
    <Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh : Adobe DNG Converter 8.7>
    You then need to watch this video to get hang of it:
    <Camera Raw: How to use Adobe DNG Converter - YouTube>
    Hope this helps.

  • High ISO on D4s files not supported

    When shooting with a Nikon D4s on IOS above 2,000 I get the error message in Aperture file type not supported.
    1,000 and under is fine.

    You need to be running the latest updated version of Mavericks OSX 10.9.4
    You need to be running the latest version of Aperture 3.5.1
    You need to have installed the latest Aperture digital camera RAW compatibility update 5.05
    As for your Nikon 4s, you need to set your camera menu setting for the type of file compression to your RAW/NEF images to the following:
    Lossless Compressed
    Go to your 4s camera shooting menu and locate the NEF(RAW) recording option, then select the NEF(RAW) compression option, then select and turn on the Lossless Compressed option. Aperture vers 3.5.1 with camera RAW compatibility update 5.05 WILL ONLY support Nikon 4s NEF files if they are shot in Lossless Compressed format. Hope this helps.

  • Disappointed in the quality of the 1.1 raw converter at high isos

    I've been using Lightroom since the first Windows beta, and the very first thing that jumped out at me was the wonderful way it handled digital noise at high isos. It seemed to convert it to a unique kind of grain -- I thought of it as digital grain.
    I started shooting at ISO 1600 intentionally just to get that look. ISO 1600, jam the color noise reduction up to 100 percent, and leave the luminance slider at 0. Ah, heaven!
    I upgraded to 1.1, and since I've been doing some high-key work at lower isos recently, I didn't notice a change. Then, a few weeks ago I was editing some old stuff, and I zoomed in, and thought "That's odd. It looks like there is some luminance smoothing going on." I checked the luminance slider, and it was still at 0.
    I was absolutely positive I found a bug, so I googled, and that lead me here, where I read numerous threads on the subject. OK, I get it, the new de-mosiacing algorithms can reduce the level of noise for a certain level of perceived detail. I've checked it out, and in some of my images I can see what that means. I'd have to say I like the new look in 3 out of the 250 or so ISO 1600 images I've looked at so far. I tried just living with it -- maybe I was being too afraid of change, and maybe I would get used to it over time. Sadly, that wasn't the case.
    The fact is, even if the overall level of noise has gone down since v. 1.0, the
    type of noise changed, and it's something that I can clearly see in my larger prints. Do I see it in my smaller prints? Not really. But every time I zoom in to 100 percent on an image, I grate my teeth, and become just a little bit more resentful.
    For me the whole point of Lightroom is that I'm able to process my images, come back in six months, and have them be exactly the same as they were before. If my older images start shifting around and changing themselves behind my back every time I upgrade, what's the point?
    I butt my head against this every time I process stuff at high isos, and I get extremely frustrated when working with some of the 1.5k+ shots I intentionally shot at 1600 just to get the wonderful luminance noise look.
    So I'm going to plead with the development team here:
    please give me my old noise profile back! Don't make me downgrade my entire library to 1.0 and live with version 1.0 on Windows forever. Give me some hope!

    I knew about this issue with the version 1.1 but, sincerely, I was quite happy with the new improved sharpen and noise reduction tools, and also with the clarity tools and all the improvements... until now.
    I just have printed a more or less big print (20x25cm), I looked at the print and... "what's that?". My print seems a paint. It just seems this kind of pics you get after applying some "oil paint" filter in your favorite image editing software. HORRIBLE. I don't know if the print interpolation (I just added some resolution in the print module) also accentuated this effect.
    Definitively I don't like this "look". It's too different from any other raw converter. It doesn't seems a photograph, digital or not. Version 1.0 had some issues, maybe it was too noisy and the sharpening wasn't good but you could use your favorite noise reduction sw or your editing sw and improve noise/sharpen. What can I do with this "paint"?.

Maybe you are looking for