High latency causing problems... and frustration w...

I have a femtocell that requires the latency on any single hop on the internet to be less than 240ms, any longer than this and it drops my phone call. On contacting the supplier of the femtocell, they asked me to use Traceroute to see how long the path to a server was (I used Google.com) and many of the hops were over 240ms, some as long as 4922ms.
On scanning this forum, there are other users out there (mostly gamers) who are suffering from latency problems. Has anyone had any success resolving the problem? I can send copies of the Traceroute outputs that clearly show high latency between routers with addresses such as interconnect2-gig1-0.manchester.fixed.bt.net, core2-pos0-6-1-0.ealing.ukcore.bt.net and core4te-0-7-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net, to anyone that may be able to help.
The best I've so far had from BT is that:
- It's a problem with the femtocell supplier: no, the supplier requested from ISPs their longest expected latency prior to releasing the femtocell and set the timeout to be equal to this
- It's a problem with my Mac mail: the fact that I use a Mac has absolutely nothing to do with network latency
- There's interference between my mobile phone and my wireless: this isn't the case (I'm a wireless communications engineer by background) and, if it was, almost no-one would be able to use mobile phones given the number of wireless access points in homes and offices.
Every time I get a call from the call centre it's someone different, who doesn't understand the problem, doesn't know what a femtocell is and hasn't read the notes which clearly state that I want to be called on my mobile, not on my home phone. It's looking like my best option may be to try to find another ISP who doesn't have this problem.

I think you have the result of what is maybe a 2 fold issue.
Femtocell technology is still a relatively new technology as you;ll  know from your job.
If you think about the security issues of running a femtocell, that;s to say what it actually has to fulfil,
Security for femtocell networks spans several distinct requirements. The service provider must authenticate users as they arrive on the network. The RF link between the handset and the femtocell must be secured for both user and control plane traffic. And lastly, the mobile network traffic must be placed into a virtual private network as it traverses the wired ISP network to ensure that the traffic is protected while transiting this public network and only authorized users can forward traffic to the mobile operator's network.
There is however one very important element of femtocell security which makes the implementation significantly more complex. This relates to latency as you say, which must be carefully managed especially for applications such as VoIP/SIP. Compounding this challenge is the unknown nature of the latency across the ISP network, which has resulted in service providers requiring latency in the femtocell to be minimized, as you say.
If you add to that the fact that the BT broadband system is based on an algorithm packet handled system to ensure data quality across maybe noisy telephone lines, it all compounds to add to the problems of the running of the femtocell.
In other words if you have a highly error corrected and interleaved broadband line, it's not going to help the femtocell out by adding additional latency to what is already a fairly complicated situation where data handling is concerned....

Similar Messages

  • HP ENVY 4500 creates its own SSID on my WiFi network causing problems and confusion

    I am finding this problem hard to articulate clearly and I can’t find any information on the internet about why my new HP Envy 4500 printer has set itself up with its own SSID on my WiFi network, but here goes :
    I bought an HP Envy 4500 all in one printer for my daughter’s room in university, which has a WiFi network with WPA security. First I tried to add this printer to the room WiFi using the printer menu, but it gave an error stating that the WPA passkey format was incorrect, when in fact it was the correct password. So instead I had to install the printer using the installation options accessed from the HP website using her laptop.
    This has worked, but it has also set the printer up with its own independent SSID called ‘HP-Setup-45-ENVY 4500 Series’. This separate SSID for the printer is causing some problems and does not seem to have any useful purpose. For example sometimes documents randomly will not print from the laptop, but if you then disconnect the laptop from the room SSID and reconnect it to the printer SSID, the documents will then print, but then you have to reconnect to the room's SSID when done. This is confusing and of course completely unwanted behaviour.
    Does anyone know why this new SSID called ‘HP-Setup-45-ENVY 4500 Series’ has been set up for the printer please? Can I get rid of it so that printer is simply a device connected on the WiFi network in the room please?
    I hope this makes sense as this a very frustrating issue for something that should be completely straightforward.
    Thanks.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Go into the printer settings and disable Wireless Direct. Done.
    Say thanks by clicking the Kudos Thumbs Up to the right in the post.
    If my post resolved your problem, please mark it as an Accepted Solution ...
    I worked for HP but now I'm retired!

  • High Latency to midwest and east coast servers

    Hello,
    Over the last week I have been experiencing excessively high latency to several online gaming and web sites. The problem appears to be a peering issue between verizon.net and att.net or possibly alter.net (not sure who owns them?). Here are several trace routes that illustrate the problem. Calling verizon support has got me no where so far as well as contacting the gaming sites since this looks to them like an ISP issue.
    This is blizzard (dallas data center):
    Tracing route to 63.241.255.16 over a maximum of 30 hops
      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
      2     8 ms     7 ms     6 ms  L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-142.verizon-gni.net [173.55.53
    .1]
      3    13 ms    11 ms    12 ms  G4-0-6-1142.LSANCA-LCR-11.verizon-gni.net [130.8
    1.140.122]
      4    12 ms    11 ms    12 ms  so-4-3-0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81
    .29.244]
      5    12 ms    14 ms    11 ms  0.so-1-2-0.XL3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.133]
      6    13 ms    11 ms    12 ms  0.ge-7-0-0.BR2.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.116.157]
      7    12 ms    12 ms    10 ms  192.205.35.161
      8    48 ms    47 ms    47 ms  cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.123.30.134]
      9   473 ms   501 ms   514 ms  cr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.28.177]
     10    54 ms    52 ms    52 ms  gar23.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.138.157]
     11    47 ms    52 ms    47 ms  12-122-254-154.attens.net [12.122.254.154]
     12   504 ms   482 ms   477 ms  mdf001c7613r0003-gig-12-1.dal1.attens.net [63.24
    1.193.22]
     13     *        *        *     Request timed out.  <== last hop blocks ICMP by blizzard
    This is lotro.com (boston area data center)
    Tracing route to gls.lotro.com [206.16.13.82]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
      2     6 ms     7 ms     8 ms  L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-142.verizon-gni.net [173.55.53
    .1]
      3    10 ms    12 ms     9 ms  G4-0-6-1142.LSANCA-LCR-11.verizon-gni.net [130.8
    1.140.122]
      4    12 ms    12 ms    12 ms  so-4-3-0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81
    .29.244]
      5    43 ms    12 ms    12 ms  0.so-1-2-0.XL3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.133]
      6    12 ms    12 ms    12 ms  0.ge-7-0-0.BR2.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.116.157]
      7    12 ms    12 ms    12 ms  192.205.35.161
      8   445 ms   432 ms   424 ms  cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.123.30.134]
      9   451 ms   445 ms   446 ms  cr1.slkut.ip.att.net [12.122.30.29]
     10   438 ms   442 ms   447 ms  cr2.dvmco.ip.att.net [12.122.30.26]
     11   438 ms   412 ms   430 ms  cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.31.86]
     12   454 ms   434 ms   394 ms  cr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.2.54]
     13   428 ms   427 ms   442 ms  cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.1.1]
     14   410 ms   416 ms   437 ms  cr2.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.2.14]
     15   395 ms   411 ms   417 ms  cr1.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.122.31.126]
     16   455 ms   450 ms   426 ms  gar5.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.122.145.29]
     17   429 ms   424 ms   435 ms  12-122-254-14.attens.net [12.122.254.14]
     18   420 ms   434 ms   430 ms  mdf001c7613r0004-gig-12-1.bos1.attens.net [12.13
    0.0.174]
     19   469 ms   471 ms   442 ms  12.130.10.69
     20   515 ms   507 ms   507 ms  206.16.13.82
    Trace complete.
    The trace route below is using a completely different ISP (Intelenet). They see a similar but much less severe problem.
    Tracing route to gls.lotro.com [206.16.13.82]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  xxxx [x.x.x.x]
      2     2 ms     2 ms     2 ms  x.x.x.x
      3     3 ms     2 ms     2 ms  x.x.x.x
      4     3 ms     2 ms     2 ms  p6c3.irv.intelenet.net [206.82.223.85]
      5     2 ms     2 ms     2 ms  p2b2.irv.intelenet.net [206.82.223.70]
      6     4 ms     4 ms     4 ms  ip65-47-228-17.z228-47-65.customer.algx.net [65.
    47.228.17]
      7     4 ms     3 ms     3 ms  71.5.170.17.ptr.us.xo.net [71.5.170.17]
      8     4 ms     4 ms     4 ms  192.205.35.157
      9    79 ms    78 ms    78 ms  cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.129.102]
     10    78 ms    78 ms    79 ms  cr1.slkut.ip.att.net [12.122.30.29]
     11    77 ms    78 ms    77 ms  cr2.dvmco.ip.att.net [12.122.30.26]
     12    79 ms    79 ms    79 ms  cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.31.86]
     13    78 ms    78 ms    77 ms  cr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.2.54]
     14    79 ms    78 ms    78 ms  cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.1.1]
     15    79 ms    78 ms    78 ms  cr2.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.2.14]
     16    78 ms    78 ms    79 ms  cr1.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.122.31.126]
     17    78 ms    78 ms    78 ms  gar5.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.122.145.29]
     18    79 ms    79 ms    79 ms  12-122-254-14.attens.net [12.122.254.14]
     19    78 ms    78 ms    78 ms  mdf001c7613r0004-gig-12-1.bos1.attens.net [12.13
    0.0.174]
     20    79 ms    79 ms    79 ms  12.130.10.69
     21    78 ms    78 ms    78 ms  206.16.13.82
    Trace complete.
    This is having a very big impact on my internet service performance. I really need this resolve or I may have to consider changing to another ISP who is not see this problem.

    I would like to also post on this -  as Riot Games is suggesting it may be a FIOS issue as well. 
    Please look into this, as its been 3-4 days that your connection issues are disrupting us:
    http://pastebin.com/FXLAJ3CW

  • Your current updates are causing problems and will not install correctly how do we stop it

    the security update you currently have causes problems with other software and does not install at all. Current corrections the entire pc has to be set back to a restore date to remove it

    Hi;
    I apologize about your not being able to reply to my response in the Payments sub-forum, thanks for re-posting here.
    I forwarded your issue to a Support team that will take care of it.  If you could send me a good contact phone # via email to [email protected] I will give that to the Support team so they have a few ways to contact you.  Please also include the AdobeID for both accounts so they know what all to look at.
    Thanks,
    Josh

  • High latency between session and session step !

    Hi everyone,
    one Operator's picture link to describe :
    http://www.glowfoto.com/static_image/24-025726L/3954/png/09/2010/img6/glowfoto
    When you look at session 18 INT_520_T_DWH_ME...., it begins at 11:28:10. Then when you look at it's first step 65 it starts at 11:29:18.
    Do you have any idea why we get some much latency between the session and the first session step ? Almost 70 seconds waiting (or doing something else maybe ?)
    Thanks in advance
    Pierre-Henri

    hi there was a problem in the Manchester area earlier today but that is now resolved
    the first hop to your home hub is very high typically <1 not 305 may be worth trying to check if your network card drivers are up to date also try if you can another cable also try another port on your hub just as some extra suggestions
    If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

  • High Latency between computer and home hub

    My internet began to run very slow last night with disconnects lasting about a minute. I have used BT for many years with very few problems.
    I ran a speed test through the bt site and it reports my line is working correctly.
    I ran a Tracert as follows
    C:\Users\Neil>tracert www.bbc.co.uk
    Tracing route to www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.246.92]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
    1 366 ms 396 ms 305 ms BThomehub.home [192.168.1.254]
    2 292 ms 296 ms 335 ms 217.32.143.226
    3 366 ms 285 ms 292 ms 217.32.144.14
    4 287 ms 293 ms 287 ms 213.120.181.26
    5 290 ms 379 ms 306 ms 217.41.169.183
    6 328 ms 296 ms 287 ms 217.41.169.107
    7 332 ms 333 ms 289 ms acc1-10GigE-10-3-0.sf.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.2
    51.97]
    8 302 ms 309 ms 301 ms core1-te0-0-0-7.ealing.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.25
    1.31]
    9 323 ms 288 ms 290 ms peer2-xe1-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.2
    54.104]
    10 301 ms 297 ms 369 ms 194.74.65.42
    11 * * * Request timed out.
    12 287 ms 299 ms 374 ms ae0.er01.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk [132.185.254.93]
    13 295 ms 308 ms 304 ms 132.185.255.165
    14 308 ms 300 ms 298 ms bbc-vip013.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk [212.58.246.92]
    Trace complete.
    I have tested in on second computer with similiar results. Both are wired connections with no previous connection problems.
    Does this suggest a problem with the router/filter itself or could it also be a fault on BTs end?

    hi there was a problem in the Manchester area earlier today but that is now resolved
    the first hop to your home hub is very high typically <1 not 305 may be worth trying to check if your network card drivers are up to date also try if you can another cable also try another port on your hub just as some extra suggestions
    If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

  • Safari 3.1 installed on 10.3.9, caused problems and proposed solution

    Dear all,
    I accidentally installed Safari 3.1 on my G4 10.3.9. Somehow I was confused and thought that it would run on my OS.
    Wrong.
    *Problems caused:*
    Various programme's did not run, like, of course, Safari, Mail, Skype, Software Update. Other people have similar problems with different programme's.
    Solution:
    1) Download Pacifist http://www.charlessoft.com/
    2) Download the Safari.pkg 1.2 and 1.3.1 versions
    3) Run Pacifist: first install 1.2 followed by 'repair disk permissions' in disk utility
    4) restart
    5) run Pacifist, install via Pacifist safari.pkg 1.3.1.
    *Now the follwing is IMPORTANT*
    6) After installing Safari.pkg 1.2 I got the message that 1.3.1 was already installed which was NOT the case since I checked [APPLE-key]-'I' Safari and it said 1.2. I guess, but I am not a specialist, that this has caused the problem. Old files cause 'erratic' behavior.
    Pacifist asks if you want to replace the Safari 1.3.1 files which are already in place. At this point you should enter 'YES'. It will install the correct 1.3.1 files.
    7) after this, restart the computer, repeat the 'repair disk permissions' procedure in disk utility.
    In my case it worked and all other programme's work again.
    Caution: I lost my bookmarks but this has happened because I deleted the safari library files as suggested in different threads. I did not keep them in a safe place... Mail is working again, no lost data!
    I hope it will work for you.
    All the best,
    Thom

    Hi Thom
    I shall try this but should I remove safari 3.1 first? I don't mind losing bookmarks - it's mail I want back most. I spoke to Apple support today and they suggested removing safari 3.1 and reinstalling the old safari which is what I guess this is but via Pacifist? Other than that they said it was archive and reinstall which I don't particularly want to try. The tech guy said he would post this as an issue to Apple.
    regards
    Christine

  • Upgrade causing problems and still no extra speed

    Hi BT
    Apparently my area had the fast broadband updated within the last few weeks but still mine is usual rubbish speed plus I have had quite a few disconnections lately with the hub lights going out.
    I have been promised time and time again that things will improve and to be patient while things sort themselves out but in 3 years they have not changed at all and BT want to still charge me the same as someone on 20 mb where is the fairness in that ?
    Any help would be grateful but excuse me for being sceptical 
    I had another disconnection 44 minutes ago grr
    Connection information
    Line state
    Connected
    Connection time
    0 days, 0:44:11
    Downstream
    3,648 Kbps
    Upstream
    448 Kbps
    ADSL settings
    VPI/VCI
    0/38
    Type
    PPPoA
    Modulation
    ITU-T G.992.1
    Latency type
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up)
    11.4 dB / 22.0 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up)
    45.0 dB / 30.5 dB
    Output power (Down/Up)
    19.4 dBm / 11.9 dBm
    Pat

    Hi Jester68
    I can help with this. Send me an email to the email address in my profile, it can be found under the about me section.
    Please remember to include your BT account number, telephone number and a link to this thread.
    Cheers
    Stuart
    BTCare Community Mod
    If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
    We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)

  • I am working from home in virtual call center. I urgently need Firefof 5, all above cause problems and crashes. Can you please advise how I can download FF 5, it is urgent. Thank you.

    I was running Firefox 5 and have been able to protect it against new versions, but now I am not being warned that there is a new version being snuck in without telling me about it.
    The problem is that I work in a virtual call center from home, and the new version is creating problems I never had before.
    Is there a way you can supply me with a link to FF5, and how do I protect it against new versions being installed on my machine. This is extremely important as I earn my living from the call center.
    Thanks and look forward to your reply.

    Perhaps you've already fixed this, but the first two links you showed us do work fine in FF and IE8,  I can not say about the third link as I did not see it on  your page.
    Are you still having trouble with this?
    E. Michael Brandt
    www.divahtml.com
    www.divahtml.com/products/scripts_dreamweaver_extensions.php
    Standards-compliant scripts and Dreamweaver Extensions
    www.valleywebdesigns.com/vwd_Vdw.asp
    JustSo PictureWindow
    JustSo PhotoAlbum, et alia

  • After a recent update, the Bookmarks menu has an extra folder called "All Bookmarks" which appears to be a copy of the bookmarks. It is causing problems and how do I fix it?

    I recently updated Firefox. The Bookmarks menu shows a new menu item called "All Bookmarks". It appears to be a copy of the bookmarks. When I try to add a new bookmark, the All Bookmarks folder is the only one shown in the dialog. I tried deleting the All Bookmarks folder, but then nothing is shown in the dialog when I try to add a new bookmark.
    If I do add a new bookmark, it is put under the All Bookmarks folder and does not show up under the top-level item I want it under. Any ideas about what I can do to fix this.
    The update went normally without my intervention.
    Thanks

    I was able to fix the problem after following the bookmark backup and restore procedures on the following page:
    http://kb.mozillazine.org/Locked_or_damaged_places.sqlite#Problems_limited_to_bookmarks
    I also had to restart Firefox so that the "Bookmark This Page" dialog would show the normal bookmarks.
    Thanks.

  • SB Live! 5.1 Digital causing problems and bad performance , maybe wrong drive

    Hi everyone,?my Soundcard is aprinted on the bill ---> ? Creative (B) SB Li've Player 5.printed on the card --->Creative?Labs SoundBlaster Li've! 5. Digital? with Emu0K-JFF chip? and Modelnumber? SB0220which I own since 2003 and my System iswinXP Media Center Edition?, msi KT4Ultra Mainboard and an athlonXP2000+ , GB ddr ram and a Radeon9800Pro with usb keyboard & mouse?I've searched this forum and those threads above the thread-list but it didn't help me out. I am concerning about the recent performance of my pc , especially when it comes to sounds in games. At?"Counterstrike .5" my pc hangs for about half a second or less if I use those "radio commands" like Go-Go-Go or Need-Backup, sometimes if other players use them. Sometimes it does those stupid things like?described below.At "Mercedes Benz World Racing" I recognized that if I hit a Sign or sth else that won't move, it plays a loud sound, as everyone can expect if u hit those things. From that on i can't control my car anymore, well, in fact I am able to, but the controls I?do with my keyboard are ... i would say "buffered" and "doubled" ---- Hit the sign -> immediately
    or after that press back to reverse -> car dri'ves about 00-200 meters back, other controls I?do are added after that with delay of each about 2-3 seconds and can't be stopped. I turned down the volume of those sounds and it worked a while, but I am not allowed to increase volume of my pc, else it will go like that again. It results in minimal to zero global sound at this game... My Windows is about 4 months old and I cant find drivers for my soundcard. I've installed the drivers from my creative-cd that came together with my soundblaster. I have downloaded a few driver packages from the creative homepage in earlier times but it is always a try-and-cry to get the proper drivers installed. And?I cant remember which?I had installed?years before. That's my current?c:\windows\system32\drivers\ctaud2k.sys (5.2.0.0252-.3.020, 87,92 KB (837.548 Bytes), 27.09.2007 02:3)?I am not sure which driver?I have installed, but I don't want to?do testing anymore, aswell as searching the creative website like I did several times before, sorry, but it does make me really really really mad and angry.One driver doesn't provide the real bass and the other let's my cthelper use 99% usage, all others are not compatible to my card. Those problems occured the first time for about year or later. At the moment there are no IRQ-conflicts. Please tell me whats wrong here or help me find the right driver.
    /Edit: I have to add that I am not using the digital port,?because?I do not own digital speakers, it is just?the X-230?2. system from logitech?Message Edited by BleiBill on 0-2-20070:59 PM
    Message Edited by BleiBill on 0-2-2007:2 PM

    I have been having the same trouble since I upgraded to XP about three years ago.
    Now I have a new system and like you said I want to dedicate this older mechine to being a media pc and started looking into things again.
    I wanted to update drivers and see that I missed an update in July of 03 or I could use a new patch but my drivers are from march of 03 and I can't find the other update.
    Come on SB where is the support we pay a premium to get.

  • Extremely slow and high latency all day.

    DSL is running extremely slow during peak hours from 12 afternoon to 12 midnight.   Lower than 50% of rated speed and high latency
    I have been frustrated with this DSL Service for months now.  I am considering contacting BBB to file a complaint and I am tired of dealing with customer service giving me the run around.  Internet is a monopoly in my area therefore verizon feels it doesn't have to do anything to keep its customers when they provide crappy service.  I am on waitlist for another internet service provider and it is going to take almost a year because of how bad the internet options are in the area and demand for better options.    I even had to pay over 100 dollars to get a truck roll come to my house to fix any issues within the house and the internet has not gotten better.  Atleast I feel I should get a refund or something.  
    Here is my speedtest result just now.  http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/2899553407
    It has been even slower at other times. http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/2893509440
    Modem is Westell 6100 or something. 
    Transceiver Statistics
    Transceiver Revision:
    7.2.3.0
    Vendor ID Code:
    4
    Line Mode:
    G.DMT Mode
    Data Path:
    Interleaved
    Transceiver Information
    Downstream Path
    Upstream Path
    DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec)
    3360
    864
    Margin (dB)
    15.5
    13.0
    Line Attenuation (dB)
    21.5
    13.0
    Transmit Power (dBm)
    7.6
    11.9
    Giganews line info
    news.giganews.com
    traceroute to {edited for privacy}, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 gw1-g-vlan201.dca.giganews.com (216.196.98.4) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
    2 ash-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.70.241) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
    3 TenGigE0-2-0-0.GW1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (63.125.125.41) 3 ms GigabitEthernet2-0-0.GW8.IAD8.ALTER.NET (63.65.76.189) 3 ms TenGigE0-2-0-0.GW1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (63.125.125.41) 3 ms
    4 P1-8-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.151.237) 72 ms 72 ms 72 ms
    5 P9-3.LSANCA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.193.123) 75 ms P8-0.LSANCA-DSL-44.verizon-gni.net (130.81.35.133) 75 ms 76 ms
    6 * * *
    7 * * *
    8 * * *
    9 * * *
    10 * * *
    11 * * *
    12 * * *
    13 * * *
    14 * * *
    15 * * *
    16 * * Max number of unresponsive hops reached (firewall or filter?)
    news-europe.giganews.com
    traceroute to {edited for privacy}, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 vl201.gw1.ams.giganews.com (216.196.110.3) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
    2 te7-8.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.17) 0 ms te7-7.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.9) 0 ms te7-8.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.17) 0 ms
    3 te0-7-0-16.ccr21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.72.42) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
    4 te0-3-0-0.ccr21.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.48.141) 8 ms 8 ms te0-2-0-0.ccr21.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.158) 8 ms
    5 te0-7-0-4.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.84.125) 90 ms te0-0-0-4.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.84.129) 90 ms *
    6 te0-3-0-6.ccr21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.41.5) 96 ms te0-0-0-2.ccr21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.25.238) 96 ms te0-2-0-7.ccr21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.41.1) 96 ms
    7 be2042.ccr21.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.26.126) 97 ms 97 ms 97 ms
    8 uunet.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.13.138) 99 ms verizon.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.10.226) 105 ms 105 ms
    9 P0-8-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.29.127) 177 ms 178 ms P1-0-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.199.39) 174 ms
    10 P8-0.LSANCA-DSL-44.verizon-gni.net (130.81.35.133) 175 ms P9-3.LSANCA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.193.109) 187 ms 182 ms
    11 * * *
    12 * * *
    13 * * *
    14 * * *
    15 * * *
    16 * * *
    17 * * *
    18 * * *
    19 * * *
    20 * * *
    21 * Max number of unresponsive hops reached (firewall or filter?)
    Here is what ICSI Netalyzer Results have stated.  
    Network Access Link Properties + –
    Network performance (?): Latency: 580 ms, Loss: 15.5% –
    The round-trip time (RTT) between your computer and our server is 580 ms, which is somewhat high. This may be due to a variety of factors, including distance between your computer and our server, a slow network link, or other network traffic.
    We recorded a packet loss of 16%. This loss is very significant and will lead to serious performance problems. It could be due either to very high load on our servers due to a large number of visitors, or problems in your network. Of the packet loss, at least 14.0% of the packets appear to have been lost on the path from your computer to our servers.
    TCP connection setup latency (?): 720ms –
    The time it takes for your computer to set up a TCP connection with our server is 720 ms, which is quite high. This may be due to a variety of factors, including a significant distance between your computer and our server, a particularly slow or poor network link, or problems in your network.
    Background measurement of network health (?): 3 transient outages, longest: 0.8 seconds –
    During most of Netalyzr's execution, the client continuously measures the state of the network in the background, looking for short outages. During testing, the client observed 3 such outages. The longest outage lasted for 0.8 seconds. This suggests a general problem with the network where connectivity is intermittent. This loss might also cause some of Netalyzr's other tests to produce incorrect results.
    Network bandwidth (?): Upload 700 Kbit/s, Download 2.3 Mbit/s +
    Network buffer measurements (?): Uplink 5400 ms, Downlink 1200 ms –
    We estimate your uplink as having 5400 ms of buffering. This is quite high, and you may experience substantial disruption to your network performance when performing interactive tasks such as web-surfing while simultaneously conducting large uploads. With such a buffer, real-time applications such as games or audio chat can work quite poorly when conducting large uploads at the same time.
    We estimate your downlink as having 1200 ms of buffering. This is quite high, and you may experience substantial disruption to your network performance when performing interactive tasks such as web-surfing while simultaneously conducting large downloads. With such a buffer, real-time applications such as games or audio chat can work quite poorly when conducting large downloads at the same time.
    HTTP Tests + –
    Address-based HTTP proxy detection (?): OK +
    Content-based HTTP proxy detection (?): OK +
    HTTP proxy detection via malformed requests (?): OK +
    Filetype-based filtering (?): OK +
    HTTP caching behavior (?): OK +
    JavaScript-based tests (?): OK +
    DNS Tests + –
    Restricted domain DNS lookup (?): OK +
    Unrestricted domain DNS lookup (?): OK +
    DNS resolver address (?): OK +
    DNS resolver properties (?): Lookup latency 520 ms +
    Direct probing of DNS resolvers (?): +
    DNS glue policy (?): OK +
    DNS resolver port randomization (?): OK +
    DNS lookups of popular domains (?): OK +
    DNS external proxy (?): OK +
    DNS results wildcarding (?): Warning –
    Your ISP's DNS server returns IP addresses even for domain names which should not resolve. Instead of an error, the DNS server returns an address of 199.101.28.20, which resolves to search.dnsassist.verizon.net. You can inspect the resulting HTML content here.
    There are several possible explanations for this behavior. The most likely cause is that the ISP is attempting to profit from customer's typos by presenting advertisements in response to bad requests, but it could also be due to an error or misconfiguration in the DNS server.
    The big problem with this behavior is that it can potentially break any network application which relies on DNS properly returning an error when a name does not exist.
    The following lists your DNS server's behavior in more detail.
    Please help.  I am so frustrated I literally have fights with my family over internet problems.  I am right now looking for other options and even starting to think about paying over 100 a month for dedicated line or T1 if they can service my area.  

    Not a single response from Verizon on this? And after you posted the tests & information they will need? I think I may have to make a service choice soon. Its bad enough Verizon can't post a simple email address for our support, they have removed Usenet access, removed access to our websites (I use HTML so their sitebuilder is useless)... Sheeshe...

  • High latency issue When connected through Wifi

    Hi
    I have configured wlc 2504 with cisco 3600 ap .when i connected my laptop wlan on n range,i tried to ping with my network devices am getting high latency 130ms,150ms
    Can anybody provide solution for this
    by
    Veeramani.G

    Hi Veeramani,
    There are actually a lot of different factors that can go into high latency type problems on your wireless deployment such as co-channel interference, interference from other wireless devices, and overall utilization on the AP/Channel.  With that said, there are a number of questions that need to be answered:
    1. Is this issue isolated to either the 802.11b/g 2.4Ghz, the 802.11a 5Ghz, or both bands?
    2.  While associated to the Access Point, in the Controller Web interface, navigate to Monitor > Access Points > 802.11a/n or 802.11b/g/n(pick the band your client is associated on) > Find the Access Point and scroll to the far right.  Hover over the small blue box and select 'Detail'.  Find the section labeled 'Load Statistics' and let me know what you see as the Channel Utilization percentage as well as the 'Attached Client Count'
    3. Since you have a 3600, I am assuming you have CleanAir enabled on them.  Navigate to Monitor > Cisco CleanAir, and see if you can pinpoint any noticeable interfering devices with high % Duty Cycle

  • Invalid session cookie on High latency wan connections

    Hello,
    I've had users at a remote site complaining that they are getting disconnected regularly from the SGD server here and are then unable to reconnect for several minutes. The connection is a GRE tunnel over the between sites with several firewalls and proxies in between. As well, the clients are behind a NAT. This is a standalone server SGD 4.41. As a test, I set up an SGD server at the remote location and logged into it. I've been disconnected twice at random intervals with a popup dialog that says "Invalid connection Cookie" Please contact your Administrator. In the webtop browser window I attempted a refresh which resulted in a Session Expired message in the webtop message window. I login again and I see my application session still there but upon attempting to connect to it I receive the following:
    Web Service Request Failed
    The following fault was returned from the server
    Code Client.InvalidSessionCookie
    String <cookie info etc...> for admin:runCommand
    In a subsequent incident I received a popup with the message: The session already has a Secure Global Desktop Client Connection
    Once this popped up my webtop session was hung and I could not log back in to the SGD server until I closed my browser and restarted it.
    The connection has high latency 365+ ms and is notoriously unstable. Again there are multiple firewalls and proxies between the sites that I have no access to.
    Error logs show the following:
    Any ideas?
    bash-3.00# less jserver988_error.log
    2009/06/15 20:01:50.932 (pid 988) server/soapcommands/error #1245076310932
    Sun Secure Global Desktop Software (4.4) ERROR:
    Invalid session cookie supplied for session 1245075516671:servername:2172620047794735723:Li4uL191c2VyL2VwZWVsZXI=.
    The operation will fail.
    Repeat the request with a valid session cookie.
    2009/06/15 20:07:25.691 (pid 988) server/soapcommands/error #1245076645691
    Sun Secure Global Desktop Software (4.4) ERROR:
    Unable to write message of type webserver for servername:1245068645735:-3969341831847819217.
    Request will fail.
    The user should close the Secure Global Desktop Client process, end the
    session and start a new session.
    2009/06/15 20:07:28.867 (pid 988) server/soapcommands/error #1245076648867
    Sun Secure Global Desktop Software (4.4) ERROR:
    Invalid session cookie supplied for session 1245075516671:servername:2172620047794735723:Li4uL191c2VyL2VwZWVsZXI=.
    The operation will fail.
    Repeat the request with a valid session cookie.
    2009/06/15 20:08:32.384 (pid 988) server/soapcommands/error #1245076712384
    Sun Secure Global Desktop Software (4.4) ERROR:
    Invalid session cookie supplied for session 6543220712367266453:servername:1245068645735:-3969341831847819217:1.
    The operation will fail.
    Repeat the request with a valid session cookie.

    Hi DalamarUK83,
    "I have seen posts about disabling VMQ on the host/guest servers as there may be an issue with this model - this has had no effect at all, the issue persists after changing VMQ and restarting both the guest and the host OS."
    Did you disable the feature in advanced settings of physical NICs ?
    I would suggest to re-create virtual switch after disabling VMQ .
    What is the make of that NIC ?
    Best Regards
    Elton Ji
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Firefox causing problems with web pages and Yahoo

    Firefox has been causing problems with:
    Yahoo: no matter how many times I reset the font size, it is always much bigger. Also the "From" box (where my name and email address appear) has shrunk;
    This does not happen in Chrome
    A particular website has suddenly stopped working: http://explore.org/#!/live-cams/player/kitten-rescue-cam
    Instead of seeing what is going on on the live cam, all I get is a green screen.
    This does not happen in Chrome.
    I have followed all the instructions:
    - Reset Firefox
    - Disabled and re-enabled add-ons
    And yet this has solved nothing. Iam now having to run both Firefox and Chrome at the same time. This is highly frustrating. I like Firefox better than Chrome but problems are mounting up and I do need help.
    Has any one got some idea what is going on?
    Many thanks...
    Anna

    Hi
    Thank you for your input. I did try Font size, reset, zoom... the lot and nopes it did nothing. As I said the problem is in Firefox, not in Chrome.
    I also checked the plug-ins issue and it seems they are in order and up to date.
    Now this morning, the website has been working again in Firefox (was working ok in Chrome).
    Overall Firefox's performance with some websites is poor. My health report confirms the number of times it crushes (many times a day, which is highly frustrating). I am keen to keep Firefox as it is so mcuh nicer in many ways than Chrome but it's performance is an issue for me... sigh...

Maybe you are looking for

  • CMSDK Installation

    Hi, I have installed Oracle 10g, Oracle application server 10g. After that, when I install Oracle CMSDK , I am getting an error " Oracle Content Management SDK 9.0.4.2 requires Oracle Application server 10g (10.1.2)", eventhough I have already instal

  • How to share a playlist with remote friends

    iTunes Ping is gone, playlists in the Store are gone, so how can I now give my friends (not in my wi-fi, of course) a way to listen to a list of song I like? I don't want (and it's illegal) to give them my audio files, just a way to listen a preview!

  • Can i throw away my previous sysytem..?

    ..if i have just performed a re-install (whilst keeping using preferences and users). The previous system is occupying about 10GB on my hard drive.. so my question is this.. can i throw it away..? Will it harm anything..? Thanks in adavance. Shane

  • Help me!!! Fix error mac mail

    Hi all I have macbook air using mac mail to send/receive, i config two account POP and IMAP. Account POP using normal but account IMAP is regular error. Mail is still received but attachments don't be read I was deleted account IMAP and reconfig, Cre

  • When Sync the Contacts , it is getting Duplicate

    I'm using a Nokia E 90 Communicator Phone . I'm using Mail for Exchange software with it. it has configured my Comapny  Exchange mail account. Last time i upgraded the Mail for Exchange version. tI'm using the Nokia PC Suite for Sysnc this Devices. (