High latency problems with HH5/BT inifinty 2

Hello all!
I'm not really tech savy, so will explain this as best as possible. I'm basically having constantly high latency with it spiking for no reason, even though all my speeds (up and down) are fast and fine. This is also a wired connection running Cata6 cables.
When I first had my internet installed I was running around 18ms constantly. After around 6 months or so, this then increased to around 35ms. Now its normally running around 45ms, with it constantly spiking for no reason what so ever (over 100ms). I've repeatedly reset the router (both through the reset button and just unplugging the power cable). Both my download speeds and upload speeds are both great (will post the test results at the end). I've even restored factory settings.
I've had this latest speed & problem for now around 5 days and I can't clear it with anyway I know how. I called the tech team yesterday and was on the line for over thirty minutes with me explaining the problem to them, but the person on the other end was extremely rude and unhelpful (pretty useless being honest). He reset the router from his end and said there was no problems with it and that BT won't help me any further. He went on to say thats just the internet for you, which I know it isn't. In particular, its mostly affecting my online gaming. I know its nothing to do with the games servers as I house share with a person who's ISP is Virgin Media and they have zero problems playing the same game as me, even though their internet speeds aren't as fast as mine. I know it's not just the system I use. The problem is the same with my laptop, PC, smartphones, PS4 and smart TV.
It's now getting to a point when its becoming pointless having BT installed and its getting near the last straw where I really am just going to cut the service off as its awful.
Does anyone by anychance know how to solve this? If it also helps I live in London, East to be exact.
My speeds are:- Download Speed (Mbps): 73.11
Upload Speed (Mbps): 11.63
Ping Latency (ms): 43.00
Thanks to anyone that replies.

Forgot to mention that other users of the hub5a have recommeded setting the DCHP to 21 days , which I think is the max to see if that helps?
Although its does sound like somethings up if its dropping line connnection.
Have you been through the usual checks & tests rigmarole to rule out an openreach vist?
https://www.bt.com/consumerFaultTracking/public/faults/reporting.do?pageId=21
http://www.homeandwork.openreach.co.uk/problems-with-your-phone-or-broadband/search.aspx
17070 quiet line test
https://support.zen.co.uk/kb/Knowledgebase/Performing-a-Quiet-Line-Test {How to guide}
Might highlight something thats not the usual hh5a mischief.

Similar Messages

Latency problem with X-Fi Xtreme Au

Hi all. I'm new in this forum. I have a strange problem. I've bought?a X-Fi Xtreme Audio?soundcard,?and I've noticed a serious latency problem with home recording ap
ps.
With my onboard soundcard I was able to play/record with no latency, using the Asio4all driver. With my new s.card I've a very high latency while playing in realtime. Is it a known problem? Is there any solution? My pc is very?powerful, so I exclude any pc's hardware cause. Thanks in advance, bye

Hi Cardan,
I've got the same Problem with high latency as you with my PC express soundcard with VISTA.
Have you got any solutions?
regards
Mat?

Satellite U500-1DZ DPC latency problem with the graphic card geforce 310M

Hello
I have a problem with de DPC latency cause by the nvdia card driver.
I use my computer for audio and it's really not possible to work.
graph with geforce abled :
http://nsm04.casimages.com/img/2010/09/22/100922123519210586795529.png
when i disable the graphic card :
http://nsm04.casimages.com/img/2010/09/22/100922123519210586795528.png
Please give me an answer.
My computer is a Toshiba satellite U500-1DZ, intel i5
Thank you

Hi, thank you for your answers.
I have updated the last nvdia driver, the new bios and everything I found on this website, but It doesn't change anything...
Apparently I'm not the only one to have this problem, but I don't know if it comes from Toshiba or from Nvdia.
Do you know if it's normal to have four times "NVDIA High definition Audio" in the audio/video/games controllers ?
When I seactivated it it's a litlle bit less worth (but still not good)...
I'm using a preinstalled windows 7 64 bit version
Thank you !
Fred
Message was edited by: fredo0411

Latency Problem with Audigy 2 ZS notebook

I have big problem. I wanna play with my laptop, but when i use Creative ASIO on 2ms, the sound isn't clear. No problem when i play on 5, but I want on 2. Please HELP. I have ACER Aspire 1642, 512 DDR2, USB 2.0. Where is the problem? I have last drivers. PLEASE HELP!!!

rusnaka wrote:
I wanna play professional, I am musician. I use softwares like NI B4, FM7... With my internal card i can play with 1ms, but noise is -40, -30 dB!!! Beacause i bought this Audigy 2 ZS and installed on new windows instalation. I didn't conect anithing but analog speakers. On 2ms there are cracles... What can i do to resolve the problem?
Crackling can be caused by different sources (CPU performance, IRQ/resource shares, etc.) but, you can ease the situation by using 4 or 5 ms latency setting. Even you say you're musician, you can't tell the difference between 2 ms and 5 ms (also, this is not the true 'real world' latency at all you're having there).
Also, have you
- checked if your laptop is OK for realtime audio? - http://www.thesycon.de/deu/latency_check.shtml
- already made those 'normal' DAW tweaks - http://www.musicxp.net/
Are you playing on live performances or just for fun/entering MIDI data? If you read from some of those software forums (cakewalk, cubase, etc.) you'll notice, it's possible to use much higher latency settings than 2 ms w/o being called non professional musician. Also, when you enter MIDI data into recording software, it's all the same which latency settings you're using .. data goes always into same position, only soft synth outputs out of time (it's not valuable to record the soft synth output directly even some software allows it).
Hmm... which internal card are you talking 'bout ... onboard audio or some decent pro quality soundcard? Could you name that one (I know most of those and know their capabilities in this type of matter) and, are you using the internal card w/ the same PC/laptop you're using Audigy with and, which driver mode? If it's not in the same PC/laptop then, don't make direct comparison between those two (not equal performance; rather 'compare' w/ those results behind two links given below)). BTW, which 'resolution' are you using (16/24 -bit, 44-1, 48 or 96 kHz)? IIRC, those NI instruments you mentioned, are known CPU huggers so maybe that is part of your latency "issue".
Some generic reading on latency matter:
MIDI keyboard internal response to keystroke -- this is not instantaneous but on a good keyboard should be under 1 msec or so
MIDI transport latency
- If you're using MIDI cables, this is 1 msec per note in the chord, before the last note in the chord sounds. In other words, for a 6-note chord, the first note is delayed by 1 msec, the second by 2, etc., to the 6th note that is delayed by 6 msec.
- If you're using MIDI over a high-speed technology like USB, Firewire, or mLAN, there is still transmission latency but the per-note effect is far, far lower -- probably not measurable.
The Truth About Latency: Part 1
The Truth About Latency: Part 2
Gigging Safely With A PC
DSP-assisted Audio Effects & Latency
Optimising The Latency Of Your PC Audio Interface
There is also a 'more generic' MIDI issue discuissed @ http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=53547
EDIT:
Latency:CPU performance
- http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=34827
- http://www.adkproaudio.com/benchmarks.cfm
jutapaMessage Edited by jutapa on 11-22-200608:06 AM

Audio latency problem with VST, SONAR and Audigy 4 PRO

Hello all,
I have a slight problem with audio performance on my computer and I can't isolate what is wrong. I am using Cakewalk SONAR 4 studio edition, and a recently purchased Audigy 4 Pro soundcard. ( I know it's not quite professional grade, but it works well for me) I recently bought some string instruments from the Vienna Symphonic Library. So far, I love the sound of these "virtual instruments" if you will. The problem comes when I try to record them. I get stuttering and dropouts when I try to record the track in Sonar. I've tried the WDM drivers in 16 and 24 bit modes and the ASIO drivers (which apparently only support 16 bit!?) I know Creative has mentioned that these cards can record easily at 24/96 which is what I'd like if possible. Vienna instruments come in a 24 bit format. Is there something I'm doing wrong or do I need to seriously consider a different soundcard? I use Sonar to bring in the Vienna instruments as a VST. I also apply a reverb on it. When I just play this stuff on my MIDI keyboard, it all sounds great and keeps up. The moment I go to record though, I get dropouts after about 15 seconds or so. Also, is there no way to get ASIO 24 bit support for creative's consumer level cards? I'd be happy with the WDM's personally if those would work. I've looked into the KX project as well but haven't had a chance to try their drivers yet. On a different note, what are the significant differences between ASIO and WDM if any at all? (aside from supported bit rates) My current computer setup is quite powerful and I don't use much CPU power at all so I don't think it's my setup. Intel E6700 (2.67Ghz) Core 2 Duo, 2GB DDR2-800, 320GB Seagate SATA in RAID 1, Nvidia 7600GT, and Creative Audigy 4 Pro. Any help, or insight would be greatly appreciated!
Matthew

Audigy 4 Pro should support 24-bit/96 kHz w/ ASIO --> have you selected those I/O drivers in Sonar audio settings (Options-Audio-Drivers -tab). ! You need to unselect all I/O drivers first to get those 24/96 drivers selectable)?
Dropouts comes from various sources. Have you checked if the read/write caching is set properly (Sonar, try different settings)?
Stuttering may come from shared IRQ/resources and PCI Latency settings.
If your graphics card is not PCIe then, make this registry tweak
Run regedit and search the key named as DisableProgPCILatency
- set all 'DisableProgPCILatency' key values to 1 (HEX or DEC) (1 = disabled, 0 = enabled)
- boot to BIOS settings and find the "PCI latency timer" option --> set its value to 32 or 64 (this is global PCI latency setting)
- reboot
and check the IRQ situation. If there are IRQ shares between Audigy and other devices/controllers, try to get those fixed by disabling unneeded controllers/devices or by moving the Audigy into another PCI slot (PCI slots #3 and #4 are normally not shared).
Couple meaninful differences between WDM/KS and ASIO are;
- you can't get latency lower than 10 ms w/ WDM/KS (well, you can in Sonar by manually editing those buffer values but, the result is not good when you go under 10 ms buffer values (buffersize / samplerate * 1000 = latency in ms --> 512/96000*1000=5.33ms)
and
- you can record from one stereo (you can split this to two mono) source at a time w/ WDM (recording source is set in CT Surround Mixer (or windows recording controls))
- ASIO supports (Audigy serie) locked 'resolutions' only - 16/48 or 24/96
Also, tweak your system for music - http://www.musicxp.net/
Some information on CT ASIO -
http://forums.creative.com/creativel...essage.id=1726
jutapa
Message Edited by jutapa on 12-17-200606:01 PM

Delay/Latency problem with POD XTL?

Hello all, does Logic Pro 7 has the same latency issue when using with POD XTL? I have been trying to use POD XTL with GarageBand through the USB port but whenever i record, the recorded clips will always be a few milliseconds behind. I know that I can work my way around by using audio-in, but was also wondering if Logic Pro 7 has the similar problem with the USB connection as I would like to stick with digital recording. Thanks for your help.

I had the same trouble with my xtlive with usb so now I record it by connecting it to my motu828 interface the old way. I can monitor the recording without any delay this way as well.

High CPU Problems With Screensavers and Flash Player - FYI

Upgraded my 1.42 Ghz PPC MacMini (1 GB RAM) to Leopard, fresh install and suffered high CPU problems as outlined in various other threads.
Fixed major 100% cpu and 100% FAN issue by removing The Weather Channel Screensaver - so have a look at your console system info and see if a 3rd Party screensaver is causing a problem, or if no 3rd party screensaver, try using a simply screensaver like Forest.
Safari/Netscape/Firefox also were using high CPU when a webpage was using Flash, I removed Flash Player 9 (latest version) and cpu load decreased dramatically.
Go here for uninstall DMG
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=tn_14157
Hope this helps someone else until there are fixes.

Just wanted to clarify that the Flash and Screensaver problem is still ongoing even after the latest QT updates as of Nov 07.
The Flash problems is with Flash images/code that use moving graphics/user input, such as those adverts you see where you push a button to punch Paris Hilton.
I think the overall problem is with the way QT/Core Image/Core Animation is different in Leopard compared to Tiger. As have now often witnessed iTunes just displaying the Cover Flow image area and nothing else (everything else in the application area is white) when going between applications, clicking on the iTunes icon in the dock refreshes the image okay.

'Invisible' latency problem with Tascam US-122 mkii audio interface

Firstly, thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer, secondly I'm very new to Logic and troubleshooting DAWs, and thirdly this sort of thing is really difficult to describe. So, here goes:
I'm using a late 2007 macbook with a 2.2Ghz intel core 2 duo and 2GB ram with Logic Pro 9. My audio interface is a Tascam US-122 mkii.
The reported latency I should be experiencing is far less than what I can hear. That is, if I record a part through the Tascam, through guitar line in or by a microphone, when I then go to playback the track the recorded track is VERY misaligned with the rest of the song. It's usually by about a third of second- I can match them up with a mouse drag but that's only for very simple parts, e.g 1/4 notes or something. Logic isn't compensating for any latency between the interface and Logic. Is there any way to fix this? I suspect this might be something to do with the drivers for the Tascam, rather than Logic....or is it that the mac's spec is too low? If I got another audio interface, such as the Apogee One, would that be more 'plug and play' in giving me less issues with simply trying to get a recorded part appear where it should do? I've tried experimenting with the drivers (I'm currently using the one recommended by tascam) and by changing the I/O buffer size.
One other weird problem is that if I set the output and input in logic for the Tascam, I end up with really bad CPU spikes. Practically a full bar. But if I set it to the input only from the tascam, and use the default output with logic, no CPU spikes. The latency/alignment problem is basically unaffected by this.
Here's an excerpt from an email I sent to Tascam support, which sets the problem out in a slightly different way.
"In logic, when I have both the output and the input through tascam, obviously the recommended setting, it doesn't say there is much latency but there are all sorts of CPU spikes. Even though it says there isn't too much latency (i think about 15ms, which is more than i'd prefer), there is a large delay when playing back a recorded track. Basically, the tracks are misaligned about by a third of a second. On top of this, and I don't know if this indicates anything, but when I use the tascam as both input and output I can't access the lower I/O buffer settings in logic, i.e 32 or 64, as there's a lot of white noise. I was under the impression using lower I/O buffer settings might help, but....
When I set the output to the default device (macbook sound output) and take my input from the tascam, there's still a large delay. Logic reports the latency as being lower than before by about 6 ms, but upon playing back a recorded sound there really isn't any difference- we're still looking at about a third to half a second misalignment between the tracks. However, strangely, with the default output and tascam as input, the macbook can happily get down to an I/O buffer size of 32 in logic while using low latency mode, but as I say this hasn't helped the problem at all.
So, despite getting lowish reported latency, I'm getting a MASSIVE delay between a track I've recorded and where it should be, that is, about 1/3 to half a second later. "
Anyway, thanks again to anyone who has any suggestions. I've tried as much as I can think of and have had a good look in the manual and a look around these forums, but since I can't really figure out what the problem exactly is it's proving hard- so apologies if it's something really obvious.
Thanks to anyone who helps, I know it might not be very interesting since Logic 10 just came out......
Mike

Actually, at long last and thinking about it differently, I've sort of sorted out my own problem- the 'delay' or 'invisible latency' was caused by using the tascam as input and the macbook as output. But I'm still getting massive CPU spikes and can see a lot of crashes incoming....is that because of a poor driver, or because of a poor macbook? Would something like the apogee one be less of a CPU hog?

Tecra a11 s3540 latency problems with Usb sound card.

Hello, I buy this laptop some months ago to use it as Digital audio work station, but ocours that may usb sound card (Focusrite saffire usb 6) and other usb controller (Novation lounchpad) doesn´t work properlly; the sound card work with to much latency, and the controller its extremlly slow to response...
Any one have the same experience with some usb audio devices?
Any one have some addvices about this problem?
cheers
Rudolf

UPDATE: I got the MIDI I/O to USB adapter working. Now I just need to get the USB Microphone and USB Sound Card to work.

High temperature problems with macbook pro 13"

hello all
it is my first macbook pro i am new on macOS, i i bought it since 5 months at Appel store
MacBook Pro
Retina, 13-inch, Mid 2014
Processor 2.6 GHz Intel Core i5
Memory 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
Graphics Intel Iris 1536 MB
Software OS X 10.9.5 (13F34)
however i remark when i play on Facebook game like criminal case or show video on youtube it seems that my laptop gets high temperature and my battery runs out quickly, is it normal behaviour ? i need advise there are any application can show me what internal temperature of my laptop ? what can i do to resolve this situation

is it normal behaviour ?
Yes. Videos are processor-intensive actions, and gaming is even more so.
There is nothing you need to do, other than provide adequate air circulation so that the MBP can dissipate heat properly. The aluminum case is specifically designed to do that, so it's normal for it to feel quite warm. Don't use cases or "skins" because they will impede heat dissipation, and don't be tempted to install some clever hack to make its exhaust fan run faster. That will just draw more needless dust inside.
If the MBP gets too hot it will reduce its processor load automatically, and if that fails to reduce its temperature it will simply shut down on its own.
You should consider upgrading to Yosemite. It's completely subjective but all my portable Macs seem to run cooler with Yosemite than they did with Mavericks. Their battery life is much greater though. That's not subjective, I measured it. If the battery life is greater they are almost certainly running cooler.
Back up your Mac prior to upgrading OS X, as a precaution against the unexpected. To learn how to use Time Machine read Mac Basics: Time Machine backs up your Mac - Apple Support.

DataGuard question - overcoming network latency problem

Hi
Dataguard for 10.2.0.4
Assuming we have a latency problem with the network between the primary and secondary databases in a dataguard configuration.
That means that my bottleneck is currently the network that cannot accommodate the amount of redo that is generated per second by the primary, and archive logs are accumulating on the primary site
Is there a way to configure the redo transport on the primary to transfer the archive logs in parallel – in case there is an accumulation of archive logs waiting to be shipped
I am talking parallel transfer to the same site , not to different sites – just to overcome the network bottleneck
Thanks in advance
Orna

Hi Sybrand,
Quoting from the doc
'Oracle Database 10g Release 2 introduces the ability to have multiple ARCn processes sending redo for a single archived-redo log over the network, reducing the time required to ship a single archive log to a remote destination. In previous Oracle Database releases, only one ARCn process at a time could archive redo from a given log file. The maximum number of network connections that will be used in parallel to perform archival to a destination is controlled using the MAX_CONNECTIONS attribute of the LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_n initialization parameter. The LOG_ARCHIVE_MAX_PROCESSES initialization parameter can be set as high as 30, (the previous maximum was 10)'
My 'back of a cigarette packet' calculation was not meant to be exact just meant to illustrate a point :-)
I still think your confusing bandwidth with latency but I don't want to poke an angry response :-)
Cheers,
Harry
Edited by: Harry on Jul 10, 2009 3:33 PM - seems the language filter doesn;t like my British slang. Changed to cigarette......

High latency issue of an evening whilst gaming.

Hiya`s Peeps, Having recently switched to BT from Virgin (this being only my third day as a customer) as the VM service for gaming in my area (Sth Manchester) on thier 50mb package was simply not viable due to over utilisation issues, I now find myself experiencing high latency issues with my BT service.
All three evenings have been lost to me as my in game latency (World of Warcraft) has rose upto 3500ms with occasional disconnections.
Also strange was that was after the BB was first switched on I had a consistent in-game latency of 24ms home and 24ms world, this lasted around 8 hours until I experienced my first lag spike, I was disconnected and when I eventually was able to get back in game, some 20 minutes or so later, my home and world latency had changed to 42/45 (still playable ) but every 10 to 15 minutes the world latency would again rise to around 3k and above and I would again be disconnected from the server.
I do apologise for the lack of any technical detail within this post as I simply do not understand such and struggle terribly with it, I am very happy with both my speed and ping tests, both being excellent in comparison to that that I would see when using the VM service.
What I am after I guess is advice from the community on how to get the best from BT bb for playing my online game, this connection is only used for World of Warcraft and very light reading on the www, I do not have a phone connected to this line and use no wireless connections with it at all, this PC (hard wired) is the only contraption connected.
Any help and advice will be greatly appreciated, Thankyou
Les

welcome to the forum
there is a 10 day training period after your connection is activated during which time you need to leave the router connected with no manual resets. The router may reset (often) during training but that is normal as the equipment in the exchnage tries to find the best stable connection for your line.
after the training period is complete and you have a stable connection then you can get the latency changed to 'fast' if yours latency is 'interleaved' changing to fast can make your line less stable than interleaved but it is the choice of gamers
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

WoW wireless Headset Mic latency issue with windows 7

I have an latency problem with my mic. I tried to record something with different audio programs (audition, audacity) but i couldn't hit the beat.
the monitoring was enable so i could hear and watched that my voice was time delayed.
Im running windows 7 64bit on my pc, so Im a bit confused, because the problem is just occured on the mac os, as i read in the other threads.
I disabled the Thx, EQ and VoiceFX in the control panel to get the same "settings" like the mac users by deleting the THXTruStudioPCUSBAudioPlugin.kext but it didnt worked for me.

Plug the Droid in and then find the device driver, remove the device driver, restart windows and your Droid and try again.
Here is a link for additional information http://www.droidforums.net/forum/droid-general-discussions/22437-windows-7-will-not-sync-my-droid.html

[Athlon64] Problem with MSI RS480M2-IL

Hi all,
I have problem with MSI RS480M2-IL. My problem is My temperature is very high... around 55-60c ... i am using AMD 3000+ Venice and no OC... and SpeedFan unable to detect my Voltage usage... Aida32 also same... 1 more thing is when i tried to run SiSoft Sandra 2005... it will take alot of time to load, sometime will just hang. i Test PCMark04 and found only got 3k for average mark... my friend getting 4k+ and we are using same spec... Below is my Spec:-
MSI RS480M2-IL
AMD 64 3000+ Venice E3
Bios Version 3.8
Geil PC3200 DDR400 2.5-3-3-6
Maxtor 60GB HDD 7200RPM 2mb
Verudium Power Vortex 420W
Hope some one can advised me what to do... my score too low and my board detect temperature and voltage is not accurate... Hope MSI Engineer will look thought and help me... Thank for Viewing !

the underlying "Who's fault is it?" question: AMD64 VENICE CORE (E3) PROCESSORS? or MSI RS480M2-IL MOBOS?
so far, ALL users with this proc/mobo combination HAVE the high (or incorrect) temperature issue. replacing the mobo obviously will not resolve the issue but replacing the proc with one that is NOT a Venice E3 core, does the trick. but of course, not everyone will have the privilege of exchanging their damned proce via the retailer specially if it's beyond the first 21 days of purchase.
in my case, my retailer refused to have the E3 proc replaced with the 'corrected' E6 version no matter how hard you explained the known issues with the E3. no chance of AMD recalling the E3 cores since problems with are only isolated to the particular MSI RS480M2 boards.
so for users that are and will be stuck with this combination, what is the solution then to the temperature issue? in my opinion, it's up to MSI to perhaps release a bios update that will correct this. another important thing to consider is the question: IS MY VENICE CORE INDEED OVERHEATING OR IS IT JUST THE MSI MOBO SHOWING INCORRECT READINGS? the proc overheating in actuality is obviously a lot different thatn just having an incorrect bios temp readings.
based on what i have observed, my Venice core displays the correct cpu temps (33-35*C) when being used on a MSI K8 Diamond mobo. placing the proc back to the R2480M2 board shows a very unusual 61-63*C bios cpu temp. furthermore, if i touch the stock heatsink/fan cooler that i have (for both motherboards), it really does NOT seem to be extremely hot to think that the cpu is actually overheating. in addition, my system using the RS480M2 performs well and has no spontaneous shutting down problems whatsoever. of course, my sense of touch is not as accurate as a thermometer but more or less, if you consider all the points i mentioned, most of us can say that the whole issue is just a matter of incorrect cpu reading.
perhaps the ATI chipset is the one to blame since i have notices as well that the Venice core processors do not seem to have this high temp problems with MSI's K8 mobos with the NVIDIA chipsets.
one last question: so do you guys think that this problem can be resolved by a simple bios revision? (as a dell tech guy, i do know for a fact that bios updates resolves overheating error messages in Inspiron/Latitude laptops)

High latency with MSI 790XT-G45 under W7

I have decided myself to go for W7 one one of my rigs.I ve got some genuine disks of 32 and 64 and loaded W7 for testing purposes .
As my intention is to use the 790XT-G45 (considering it more W7 suited than my Platinum beeing newer more CPU support) tryed both W7 versions , but there is a problem.
Using the DPC high latency tool i get like 100 us under any W7 version with this 790XT-G45.The same board is ok latency wise under XP ,it hovers around 10-20 us when you re not doing anything serious with it .I have to remind that on this board i ve also had some issues with the big mouse cursor thing that seems to be related to motherboard latencyes.
In the past i ve used the K9A2 Platinum with W7 64 RC with the same video card and sound card that i use now on the 790XT-G45 ,but the latency was always 10-20 us.In fact trying again the Platinum gives me under W7 like 10-20 us.
I ve tryed disableing onboards ,removing the Creative and updating to latest BIOS version but no joy.The latency also adds some drag to the system i mean W7 windows don t look to snappy like it feels on Platinum.
So is this board compatible to W7 for real ?
What is so different between the 2 boards ,does the 790X have bigger latencyes than the 790 FX from the Platinum.One of the issues is that even if i would choose the Platinum CPU upgrade path closes.
I repeat i ve tested both boards with default W7 drivers and with vendors drivers and same thing.
Any user with 790XT-G45 encountering this under W7 ?
At first glance it s not a very big issue ,but i m very sure this 100 us get s me while playing to more and i really hate input lag and static on my sound.
Any ideas ?

Hi Guys,
I agree with Sm3K3R that a 70+ microsecond increase in average DPC latency will have an undesirable affect on some apps (games, real-time streaming, etc.). I also believe that what is good for XP will almost certainly not be good for Windows 7. Too much of the architecture has changed. Better drivers may help going forward. To me, the bigger question is why this mobo takes so much longer to run these routines than the K9A2.
I do not have any serious problems with the apps I run. Some of them may run better with a shorter average DPC latency. I have no way to tell with what I currently have to work with. Other bottlenecks may be in play. I was just responding to Sm3K3R's request for feedback. My power option is set to high performance and my base configuration has 41 processes running, including Diskeeper real-time defragmenter, Avira Antivirus, Logitech SetPoint, Process Lasso's process governor, PeerBlocker, and TaskDock. It also includes the Microsoft search functions and the sidebar with 2 gadgets running. Most of these processes run as services. I thought it was the search, sidebar, or one or more of the non-Microsoft products causing my base 100+ average latency indicated by the DPC high latency tool, so I ran LatencyMon to find out.
I ran it several times for 2 to 5 minutes at a time, starting when the system was idle. The Nvidia display and NT Kernel & System drivers always topped the list, with latencies from 50 to 114 microseconds. The display driver's routine also ran much more often than any thing else, followed, about 60% less often, by the NT Kernel & System driver. Thus these 2 drivers contribute the most to my average DPC latency. The other products listed above most often had 0 or less than 15 microsecond DPC latencies. Once I saw this, I did not bother to check my game configuration which does not have the search, sidebar, and the non-Microsoft products listed above in it.
During a Google search of this issue, I read that someone reduced their average Windows 7 DPC latency by 50 microseconds by turning off the HPET timer. I tried this and it did not work for me.
Looking forward to the results of Sm3K3R's further testing and feedback from others.

High latency problems with HH5/BT inifinty 2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for