High # of senders at high datarates

Dear all
I wached the presentation of Matthew Kaufman from MAX09 about P2P on the Flash Platform with RTMFP. My use case is a meeting application, that may have up to 10 streams with about 20 members. In the presentation it is always talked about 1 stream that is beeing published and therefore multicasting is used (multicast for small # of senders at high datarates, posting is for large # of senders at low data rates).
Now having several webcam streams I guess this scenario will not fit into P2P anymore because it is a large # of senders at high datarates? Is this a scenario where you still have to switch to a centralized environment with a star structure/content delivery network?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Cheers,
Marc

there's nothing stopping you from having 10 multicast streams simultaneously in a group, other than bandwidth and processing power on the clients to decode and display 10 simultaneous streams.

Similar Messages

High GUI Time - Causing high Response time

Hi All,
Average GUI Response time is approx 400 ms in my ECC 6.0 system, OS - HP UX, Database - Oracle 10.2.0.5.
I expect it should always be approx 200 ms, but as it is high it is contibuting to high overall response time.
I expect there are normally two ways of high GUI time :
1) High network time between Presentation layer( User System) and Application Layer(SAP Server).
2) High amount of time in Loading User Screen
For Option 2 I have checked we are using SAP access menu so there should not any problem with loading of User Access Menu.
Average Response time for session_manager is 2 Secs.
Please suggest me what all other ways available to improve GUI time,
Can there be other reasons of high GUI time and how can we make sure that high GUI time is only because of high Network time.
Please suggest.
Shivam

I believe in case you have multiple roundtrips per step, then the client performance comes into play as well. So if you have slow clients this could be an issue too.
Basically you are already looking in the right place (network connection), but i recommend you also check:
- roundtrips per step and amount of data sent to the client
- are all transactions having high gui times, or only a few?
- how is the situation on the clients?
- if you have clients working on prod and qas check the values on the qas system too
Cheers Michael

With a Zalman 7000Acu cooler, how high vcore is too high???

I'd like to overclock a little with my Neo2, but since I don't have an accurate temp reading in my bios, it will be tricky.
I have an fx-53 w/zalman cooler and how high can I raise the vcore while still playing it safe...
I was thinking i'll raise it to 1.6v and get the best I can out of that.

Yep I can confirm 1.8v makes a funny smell

If i go to high res (720p or higher) my screen turns green and the video fast forwards to the end.

Hi,
I have windows 7 64 bit and use mozila firefox 15.0.1
I have got the problem that when i select higher resolution in videos (such as on youtube) that at 480p it will run for a while but then just stops even though the buffering is already complete.
If i go to higher resolutions like 720p or 1080p the video will run for a while again but then the screen goes green and the movie fast forwards to the end preventing me to watch movies without problems at higher res.
If u want more information about my problems or know a solution pls tell me.
Manny thanks,
Avalondra.

Could you try temporarily disabling protected mode to see if that makes a difference (instructions towards the bottom of the FAQ linked below)? I'll circle back with our video team to see if they've made any progress with this issue.
How do I troubleshoot Flash Player's protected mode for Firefox?

One of 4 node RAC always have higher load averages and higher than others

Hello,
We have a 4 node rac, 9208 on linux 4. When viewing top, we noticed the same one node always have a higher load average than the other 3 nodes. Is this normal. Loan balance is working fine but this one node always have higher load average. This is the node where we do the rac installation. Thank you.

I do not remember what is the default for clb_goal (client load balancing) for 9i but 10g is LONG.
check it
select clb_goal from dba_services where name = <service name>
you may have to change from LONG to SHORT OR SHORT to LONG depending your connection types.
dbms_service.MODIFY_SERVICE(‘<service>’,clb_goal=> dbms_service.CLB_GOAL_LONG);
Read the following article.
http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3659411/Oracle-RAC-Administration---Part-15-Connection-Load-Balancing-and-FAN.htm

MBP 15" GLOSSY HIGH RESOLUTION VERSUS MATT HIGH RESOLUTION

All: Buying a 15" MBP. Typical needs:email/Web/Pages etc but I am a painter and will be viewing a lot of art work: paintings/prints etc. Video/film is not as important than what is mentioned.
Also I will not be doing any graphic work.
Because I am in a wheelchair and I can not get to an Apple Store/ thus buying online.
Whats your opinion of the Glossy High Resolution vs the Matt high resolution for my needs..... much thanks for your help

Welcome to the forums!
Besides replies you will get here consider searching within the forums as this question comes up often it seems.
When I got my current MB Pro 15" I was skeptical about the matt screen, but when I got to the store and compared the Hi-res glossy next to the Hi-res matt I found that there really wasn't a difference in color, sharpness or overall clarity between the two. I must disclose however that I do have some vision issues. But as for color accuracy and brightness there was no difference, so to me it came down to choosing matt as it provided the additional advantage of glare reduction.
FWIW I think the standard configuration MBP glass (glossy) screen units look nicer than my matt screen model. Plus I suspect they are easier to keep clean being one flat glass surface. But for function I'm happy with the matt.

Flash causes very high CPU load (including high Xorg load)

Hello everybody,
this is my first message. I'm an Arch user since a few months, and I'm pretty sure this is the distribution I'll stick to - I pratically love everything about it, especially its simpleness. It's the first Linux that doesn't scare me away with tons of configuration files scattered around dozens of different locations. I've already gotten quite a number of things fixed by myself without even looking at the forum or wiki.
Well, it seems most of these statements can be found in most first forum posts, so I'll stop to bore you...
The problem: Playing flash videos or animations causes incredible processor load: Even youtube takes a whole CPU core (or even a little more), top shows around 80% for Xorg and around 20-30% for Firefox (a little less with Opera). I'm on Arch64 with XFCE, Athlon X2 4600+, NVidia 8200 chipset (which has severe driver problems anyway; I'm using the latest NVidia beta driver). I'd try the open source nvidia driver, but (it seems that) there's no support for my chipset yet.
Currently I'm using Adobe's Flash64 alpha, before that I used various versions fo the nspluginwrapper. 32-bit Flash also caused high CPU load, but it wasn't that much and it may have been related to nspluginwrapper rather than anything else; however I have got the impression that things became even worse with the switch to the x64 alpha (performance-wise; on the other hand, it at least loads faster and doesn't crash anymore). Like said before, youtube takes one core, but it mostly works ok then, but videos with higher resolutions that youtube's are practically impossible to watch (except when there is very little movement in the film). Neither Flash hardware acceleration on nor off makes any difference.
I've already read half of the web, searched in forums, wikis, etc., but didn't find anybody with the same problem. When Flash64 was released and people were reporting good improvements, I was hoping it would be the same for me...
What I'm looking for is suggestions of things to try... I'm out of ideas what to try and where to look. It just seems strange that I seem to have problems that others don't...
Thanks for reading and for any comments.

cerbie wrote:And, do I know you from somewhere--a little more Windows-centric--or are there many ElkMonsters, out here?
Hehe, I'm also wondering how many Cerbies are out there...
Really funny. The internet is a small place, obviously. Us meeting in a Linux forum also explains why nobody writes to the LSML anymore.

Kernel task over 100%. High CPU Load. High Temp. Problem Solved.

Hi,
I thought i would make a post as i had been having trouble with my 13 inch mid 2009 MBP for sometime (6 months), with runaway kernel tasks causing high CPU loads. I had searched through forums and discussions for a long time trying to find the problem and isolate it. Initially i discovered some problems with finder preferances that were chewing up CPU which i solved by deleting the prefereance file, allowing the system to recreate a non corrupted version. This helped but still i had problems. I tried maintainance suites like onyx, reseting PRAM, booting into safe mode, hardware checks and diagnostics, and more little tricks than i can remember. Nothing i tried really seemed to make a differance. Through reading on this forum and others i found out the kernel tasks can be a direct result of hi CPU core temps as the system runs a lot of small kernel tasks to try and take some of the CPU load away from processor intensive processes that may be contributing to hi CPU load. The thing which solved my problem in the end was opening up my MBP, being careful not to touch the logic board and literally puting my vacuum cleaner over the fan, sucking dust and dirt and dust out of my latop. This computer has been through the dirt with me, literally its been dragged through rural south east asia for a year and accompianied me to warhouse parties to perform and run lighting and visuals. Its little wonder the fan was obviously clogged. I know people tend to be holier than though with their mac products and treat them with the upmost respect, but my love for the MBP has come from how sturdy and reliable it has been under less than desirable conditions.
Now im not telling people this is what they should do, i had just noticed alot of people with this problem in my attempts to solve mine, and in the end this is what helped. My MBP now runs at a temperature where i can touch the metal near the CPU without being worried about a 3rd degree burn and the CPU load is acceptable with no run away kernel tasks. Like i saw this might not be the cause of your porblem, as my laptop has lived a rough and fun life so far, but i thought i would share this with you all as i have had contstant help from this forum and others searches for solutions to problems with my apple products.

Already tried SMC and PRAM-reset with no luck.
On my MacBook late 2008 it's the same effect.

FEX 6800-IA interface high drop rate and high overrun counters combined with slow throughput.

The interface drop rate count arises and the traffic throughput gets down to 15% of the nominal data rate of the 1Gb interface when a server with a 10Gb interface send data to a client connected at 1Gb FEX interface.
How must I configure the interface to achieve nearly 100% of 1Gb?
Client to Server: 100% of 1Gb; Sever to Client 15% of 1Gb
Server ---(10Gb)--- Nexus7010-- (10Gb)--- C6880-X----(10Gb)---FEX----(1Gb)Client

Sorry, yes of course:
Server ---(10Gb)--- Nexus7010-- (10Gb)--- C6880-X----(10Gb)---6800-IA----(1Gb)---Client

Why is the Iphone3G high data usage so high ?

I have owned a blackberry for years and just made the switch. When traveling overseas, I receive and send emails and over a normal week period I only use about 700K when using a blackberry (as I do not open attachments until I get WIFI). HOWEVER with the iphone3g to send 4 simple emails and receive 8 emails in the morning I am up to 2.5MEG !!!! How is this possible when looking at my email account on exchange, the total data is only 100K ???? I have not used any other application which requires logging on to the net / gps etc. I am NOT happy as it means I have to turn on and off my phone roaming for 5 mins to check email which is a BIG pain (because from reading the discussions that the phone automatically checks for updates which appears to SERIOUSLY eat up data). Am I doing something wrong or has Apple seriously messed up ????

Unlike the Blackberry line all Smartphones that run Windows Mobile or in this case OS X on the iPhone use full HTML graphics for email and browsing. The Blackberry line restricts what the user actually is seeing by limiting the graphics to a lower version resembling almost a WAP like experience when browsing as is seen on regular cellphones. Both AT&T (USA) and O2 (UK) offer unlimited data plans for iPhone 3G users and even Rogers (Canada) offers a 6 GB data plan at a reasonable add on price of $30.00. The only concern would be for those that don't have a data plan or for those that have less than 400 MB.

High fan speeds and high GPU temperature during idle

Hi,
I'm hearing slight similar problems around this subject but this one seems to be obscure.
My iMac 20inch (Early 2008 - 8,1) has just passed by the 3 year mark now and only yesterday just suddenly started haven't this weird gain in fan speeds mainly on the CPU.
Checking the temperature in iStat shows that its coming mainly from the GPU (GPU - 79c / GPU diode - 91c / GPU heatsink - 83c) and that's from looking as I type this.
I've done the SMC reset a few times and the PRAM reset too, but that's only managed to make things worse...occasionally on startup after the resets the screen will blank out and ask me to reset.
Below are screenshots from istats of the state of my iMac during idle:
Hope someone can help and this be of some help to others in the same situation.

I think a SMC reset will handle this for you. If not then also do a PRAM reset.
SMC RESET
Shut down the computer.
Unplug the computer's power cord and all peripherals.
Press and hold the power button for 5 seconds.
Release the power button.
Attach the computers power cable.
Press the power button to turn on the computer.
PRAM RESET
Shut down the computer.
Locate the following keys on the keyboard: Command, Option, P, and R. You will need to hold these keys down simultaneously in step 4.
Turn on the computer.
Press and hold the Command-Option-P-R keys. You must press this key combination before the gray screen appears.
Hold the keys down until the computer restarts and you hear the startup sound for the second time.
Release the keys.

High disk usage/high memory usage.

i keep getting high memory usage and high disk usage in ps cs6.
its slow when i open a file. how can i solve this problem.
thank you.
philip.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but more than what? More RAM is almost always better, but you haven't answered most of the questions posed here. The answer might be different if you have 2 GB of RAM or 32 GB of RAM already. A 9 megapixel document could get rather large with a lot of layers, but again you've neglected to give any hard info about its size.
Regarding your video card, that's a bit of a judgment call you need to make. For Photoshop CS6 I currently advise people to try to get a video card that gets a score of 1000 or better on this benchmark: http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html
Video card speed will matter when you're editing those 3D components and video card VRAM will also matter, but possibly even more importantly your GeForce 320 is a bit old, and nVidia may just not be doing their best driver work for it any more.
Everything in general will run more smoothly with a powerful modern video card. I like to recommend a VisionTek ATI Radeon HD 7750 - or if the computer power supply and your budget allow, the even more powerful 7850. VisionTek does a very good job with their hardware, IMO, and it comes with a lifetime guarantee.
Keep in mind that if you switch from nVidia to ATI or vice versa, you should carefully sweep your system to ensure all files from the old card are removed, then visit the web site of the new card's maker and download/install their latest display driver release.
Best of luck.
-Noel

Battery drain with High CPU (v6.0 Bundle 3049) due to module net.rim.io.impl

Hi,
I upgraded my Torch (9800) a week ago, and have been noticiing battery drain issues. The problem is NOT persistent, but is happening most of the times though. I am currently on OS v6.0 bundle 3049 (v6.0.0.706, platforn 6.6.0.246). My Wifi and Bluetooth are always OFF. Only using the Bell network, for which I have all the 5 bars available.
I have investigated further, and I found that the Blackberry System Software was the one running with the highest CPU - usually in the high 70s, to even high 90s. And this was consistent over hours, until the battery was dead. I have since removed any apps I suspecpected - such as Nice Office and LinkedIn. But the problem still persists.
Battery pull has been done multiple times, as well as I have checked, and there are are no OS updates available.
Now, currently, only the basic apps are loaded (Alt-Back) : Home, Messages, BBM, Phone, Borwser. All other apps are closed or exited.
Investigating further into the modules within the BB System Software, I have found that the net_rim_io_impl, is the one consuming ALL of the CPU. I am not sure where/what this module does - so I am unclear on what service within the BB I can turn OFF to get rid of the issue.
Please see the following screen shots, the CPU for the System drops a bit, as Options uses up some, else, it goes back to 90s, if left alone :-
And within the BB System Software :-
Please assist and guide, with either a fix to the module, or else, via some workaround, wherein some service can be stopped or some setting can be changed to avoid this battery drain.
Thanks!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hello scindia,
The following article should help you with maximizing the battery life on your BlackBerry® Torch™ 9800 smartphone:
How to maximize battery life and free memory on the BlackBerry smartphone - http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/KB14320
We hope this helps.
Thank you.
-FB
Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on Twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
Be sure to click Kudos! for those who have helped you.
Click "Accept as a Solution" for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

Can I fit a 1TB HDD into a MacBook Pro 17" 2.4GHz which was released in mid 2007? There are 1TB HDD available but they are 12.5" high. Will they fit this model MacBook Pro?

Can I fit a 1TB HDD into a MacBook Pro 17" 2.4GHz which was released in mid 2007? There are 1TB HDD available but they are 12.5" high. Will they fit this model MacBook Pro?

Sorry, 12.5mm high not 12.5" high!
Can I fit a 1TB HDD into a MacBook Pro 17" 2.4GHz which was released in mid 2007? There are 1TB HDD available but they are 12.5mm high. Will they fit this model MacBook Pro?

Kernel_task high cpu usage when using external monitor at 1080p

Specs
Model Name:          MacBook Pro
Model Identifier:          MacBookPro6,2
Processor Name:          Intel Core i7
Processor Speed:          2.66 GHz
Number Of Processors:          1
Total Number Of Cores:          2
L2 Cache (per core):          256 KB
L3 Cache:          4 MB
Memory:          4 GB
Processor Interconnect Speed:          4.8 GT/s
Boot ROM Version:          MBP61.0057.B0C
SMC Version (system):          1.58f15
My external display is a Samsung PX2370 connected to my MBP using an HDMI cable with a HDMI-to-miniDP adapter
I first noticed this after the last EFI update several months back. At first I thought kernel_task eats up too much cpu cycles whenever an external display is attached, but it turns out this only happens when the external display is set to 1080p. When external display is set to 720p, kernel_task is pretty much normal (~5% cpu usage) but rises up to ~150% cpu usage once the external display is set to 1080p.
kernel_task cpu usage is also with normal range when my MBP is connected to a Samsung LCD TV at 720p.
Anyone having the same problem or know of any fix/workarounds?

Seems like the problem persists when playing a 720p video on the external display set to 720p. To sum it up
Video Resolution
Main Display
External (1280x720)
External (1920x1080)
480p
ok
fluctuating kernel_task cpu usage (~5 to ~150 cpu usage)
high kernel_task cpu usage
720p
ok
high kernel_task cpu usage
high kernel_task cpu usage
1080p
ok
high kernel_task cpu usage
high kernel_task cpu usage

High # of senders at high datarates

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for