High Priority, Change PO output enhancement / userexit?

Hello guru's,
Will anyone guide me. I have an issue, if i go to change mode of a PO (ME22N) and delete the existing Output Medium (Fax, Printer,IDOC,..) etc,. it shouldn't send any output after saving the Order. Is there any user exit existing within SAP Scope to support this functionality?. or will anyone suggest me any enhancement for this function? so that i will proceed. It will be of great help. It is an urgent issue pl
Reward full points

Hi venkat,
in the print program the Fm which u wud be calling for smartform takes control parameters as input.
TDNEWID = 'X'.
TDIMMED = 'X'.
TDDEST='locl' <ur printer>
set these parameters of the struture tht u wud be passing as control parameters
it wud print automatically when smartform gets processed
Hope it will help you.
Regards ,
Nikita

Similar Messages

Is it possible in IOS to have two static routes for the same subnet, one a higher priority and "failover" between the 2?

Hi All
Is it possible in IOS to have for a particular subnet:
a) Two static routes?
b) Make one static route a higher priority than the other?
c) If one static router "goes down", failover to the lower priority static route?
We have a l2tp/vpdn connection to a supplier which can be accessed via two vlans/routes. I would like to make one route the preferred one but the "route" to failover if the preferred route goes down.
Again, many thanks in advance for all responses!
Thanks
John

Hi John,
Hope the below explaination will help you...
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
If you notice the Administrative Distance for the secondary route pointing to ISP2 is increased to 10 so that it becomes the backup link.
The above configuration with just two floating static routes partially accomplishes our requirement as it will work only in the scenario where the routers interfaces connected to the WAN link are in up/down or down/down status. But in a lot of situations we see that even though the links remain up but we are not able to reach the gateway, this usually happens when the issue is at the ISP side.
In such scenarios, IP SLAs becomes an engineer's best friend. With around six additional IOS commands we can have a more reliable automatic failover environment.
Using IP SLA the Cisco IOS gets the ability to use Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) pings to identify when a WAN link goes down at the remote end and hence allows the initiation of a backup connection from an alternative port. The Reliable Static Routing Backup using Object Tracking feature can ensure reliable backup in the case of several catastrophic events, such as Internet circuit failure or peer device failure.
IP SLA is configured to ping a target, such as a publicly routable IP address or a target inside the corporate network or your next-hop IP on the ISP's router. The pings are routed from the primary interface only. Following a sample configuration of IP SLA to generate icmp ping targeted at the ISP1s next-hop IP.
R1(config)# ip sla 1
R1(config)# icmp-echo 2.2.2.2 source-interface FastEthernet0/0
R1(config)# timeout 1000
R1(config)# threshold 2
R1(config)# frequency 3
R1(config)# ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
The above configuration defines and starts an IP SLA probe.
The ICMP Echo probe sends an ICMP Echo packet to next-hop IP 2.2.2.2 every 3 seconds, as defined by the “frequency” parameter.
Timeout sets the amount of time (in milliseconds) for which the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation waits for a response from its request packet.
Threshold sets the rising threshold that generates a reaction event and stores history information for the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation.
After defining the IP SLA operation our next step is to define an object that tracks the SLA probe. This can be accomplished by using the IOS Track Object as shown below:
R1(config)# track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
The above command will track the state of the IP SLA operation. If there are no ping responses from the next-hop IP the track will go down and it will come up when the ip sla operation starts receiving ping response.
To verify the track status use the use the “show track” command as shown below:
R1# show track
Track 1
IP SLA 1 reachability
Reachability is Down
1 change, last change 00:03:19
Latest operation return code: Unknown
The above output shows that the track status is down. Every IP SLAs operation maintains an operation return-code value. This return code is interpreted by the tracking process. The return code may return OK, OverThreshold, and several other return codes.
Different operations may have different return-code values, so only values common to all operation types are used. The below table shows the track states as per the IP SLA return code.
Tracking
Return Code
Track State
Reachability
OK or over threshold
(all other return codes)
Up
Down
The Last step in the IP SLA Reliable Static Route configuration is to add the “track” statement to the default routes pointing to the ISP routers as shown below:
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 track 1
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
The track number keyword and argument combination specifies that the static route will be installed only if the state of the configured track object is up. Hence if the track status is down the secondary route will be used to forward all the traffic.
Please rate the helpfull posts.
Regards,
Naidu.

Workflow: Setting the high priority flag

Hi,
Does any one know how to set the priority for the email notification?
(Eg: In microsoft outlook red exclamatory mark for high priority)
I tried the option priority in notification and message but its not giving the desired output(i.e Flag).

I know you can set the priority on the task.
If you click on the User step and go under Routes and Priority, you can change the priority and you will see a different icon in Workspace.
I'm not sure this will change the priority on the email though.
Jasmin

How RequestDespatcher.include() method gets higher priority ?

Hi,
I have three jsp pages named as A.jsp ,B.jsp and C.jsp respectively. In A.jsp , i include B.jsp using include directive and i include C.jsp using RequestDispatcher.include().
But in output of A.jsp , The output of C.jsp comes as first and then output of B.jsp comes as second , eventhough i included B.jsp before C.jsp.
I don't know why RequestDispatcher.include() gets higher priority than include directive of JSP.
Just clear me.
thanks in advance,
nvseenu

It has to do with when each cache is flushed.
Each of these JSP pages will build up its output text into a buffer. When that buffer is full, or you flush it manually, the text gets written to the underlying output stream.
The jsp:include uses the same buffer as its parent page. The output writer of the current page gets passed to it so that it can just append to the end.
When you short-circuit things by using the RequestDispatcher manually, you only pass along the request/response. The page invoked then obtains the output stream, and wraps its own buffer around it.
When a page is complete, it flushes its buffer to the output stream.
So the order is:
Page B completes and flushes its buffer. That result gets sent to A's buffer.
Page C completes and flushes its buffer. That result gets sent straight to the underlying response output stream.
Then page A finishes, flushes its buffer. All of its buffer (including what it got from B) now gets written to the outputstream.
Solutions:
You can manually flush the writer before you invoke the RequestDispatcher: ie out.flush(). If you try to forward/redirect after this though, it will raise an error.
If you really want to get complicated, create a ResponseWrapper, and when you invoke the RequestDispatcher, pass it a response object with an outputstream/writer that gets added to the current buffer (ie what it does with a jsp:include)
Or you can just use jsp:include.
here is some code to play with.
Try changing the flush attribute on the jsp:include to "true" and see what happens.
Uncomment the out.flush() command to get it to print in the "correct" order.
// includeOrder.jsp
<html>
<body>
Ok, this is the main page of this little test.
At this point we are going to <jsp:include> the second page:<br>
<jsp:include page="includeOrder2.jsp" flush="false"/>
<hr>
And now we use requestDispatcher.include() to include the third page<br>
<%-- out.flush(); --%>
<% request.getRequestDispatcher("includeOrder3.jsp").include(request, response); %>
<hr>
And now we are done.
</body>
</html>
// includeOrder2.jsp
Here we are on page 2!
// includeOrder3.jsp
Beware of page 3!Cheers,
evnafets

EIM Auto pushback - requeue at higher priority?

Hello,
In our EIM 4.3.2(8) implementation (ICM Enterprise integrated queues and agents), all new and incomplete activites auto-pushback to queue after 8 hours (overnight generally). The problem with this is, they're getting pushed to the back of the queue. I'd like to have all auto-pushback emails queue at a higher priority so that during days of high email volume, we don't get stragglers that keep getting pushed to the end of the queue while newer emails get handled.
I saw this:
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Transferred_Emails_Get_Sent_To_End_of_Queue
and thought maybe I could pull some Activity related column through to ICM to act on to change the priority... Not sure what I should use though. I considered looking at the "WHEN_CREATED" field and upping the priority in ICM if that's more than a day ago, but I wonder if there is a simpler way to do this.
Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

New tasks are sent from EIM to ICM in order queue priority, activity priority and oldest - in that order. While sending new task there is no differentiation between new email first time in queue Vs email which is auto pushed back to queue, if queue and activity priority are same then oldest activity criteria will be honored.
There is no other way in default EIM product to push auto pushed back emails ahead of others.

Changing the output layout of standard transaction FPWLM

Hi All,
We have a requirement where we need to change the output layout of the standard transaction FPWLM which is used fo the management of worklist for collecion management.
In this transaction under the current worklist if we select the worklist ID and display it , work items are displayed in the Grid display. We want to add certain fields here in the output layout of this transaction. We tried adding the fields by selecting the change layout option which displays the list of hidden fields which can be added . But the problem is the field which we want to add is not present in this list.
Is there any other way to add the fields to the output layout of standard transaction.
thanks
regards
manipal

Hi Manipal,
Maybe check IMG under Basic Settings for Collections Management.
This node contains the sub-node Worklist.
Two enhancements are availaable here:
BAdI: Enhancement of Worklist Items on Creation
BAdI: Enhancement of Worklist Items on Display
Maybe read the documentation for the nodes to determine if the enhancements will accomplish what you are looking for!?
Since this component is not active in our installation, I have no experience with this functionality.
Kind regards,
Robert

Placed an image in a new Illustrator document. Tried to change the Output Mode in the Output Dialog but could not select "Separations Mode".

Placed a DCS2 document image in a new Illustrator document.
Tried to change the Output Mode in the Output Dialog but could not select "Separations Mode".

I would check with the makers of ULTRASEPS.
I never heard of it, just checked their website, I don't think they support Illustrator:
What do I need to use UltraSeps?
UltraSeps requires Adobe Photoshop version CS2 or higher on Windows and Macintosh.
Its also 100% compatible with Photoshop Creative Cloud and Creative Cloud 2014.

How can I give the "user interface thread" higher priority?

We do alot of activex calls to front panels. We need to increase/decrease the priority of the user interface thread to resolve our thread problem. Anyone know how to do this?
Chuck

Hello,
As P.M. was saying, you can adjust the thread priorities
through the VI Properties dialogue.
Another place to modify the multithreading system in LabVIEW is a VI
located at: [LabVIEW Directory]\vi.lib\Utility\sysinfo.llb\threadconfig.vi. However I do not think this will remedy any
problems you are having.
From a Multithreading in LabVIEW tutorial (http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/d2e196c7416f373a862568690074c759)
Priorities in the User Interface and
Single-Threaded Applications
Within the User Interface execution
system, priority levels are handled in the same way for single-threaded and
multithreaded applications.
In single-threaded applications and
in the User Interface execution system of multithreaded applications, the
execution system queue has multiple entry points. The execution system places
higher priority VIs on the queue in front of lower priority VIs.
If a high-priority task is running and the queue contains only lower priority
tasks, the high-priority VI continues to run. For example, if the execution
queue contains two VIs of each priority level, the time-critical VIs share execution time exclusively until both finish.
Then, the high priority VIs share execution
time exclusively until both finish, and so on. However, if the higher priority
VIs call a function that waits, the execution system removes higher priority
VIs from the queue until the wait or I/O completes, assigning other tasks
(possibly with lower priority) to run. When the wait or I/O completes, the
execution system reinserts the pending task on the queue in front of lower
priority tasks. Refer to the Synchronous/Blocking Nodes section for a list of
asynchronous functions that wait.
Also, if a high priority VI calls a lower priority subVI,
that subVI is raised to the same priority level as the caller for the duration
of that call. Consequently, you do not need to modify the priority levels of
the subVIs that a VI calls to raise the priority level of the subVI.
Thus changing the priority of your VI will change the
priority of UI calls for that particular VI.
Again, I caution you because I suspect that if you are having problems
with your application not running correctly, I do not believe that manipulating
the thread priorities will resolve these issues.
Hope this helps,
Travis M
LabVIEW R&D
National Instruments

High Priority MMS

My text messages come across to the recievers as Urgent/High Priority. I have figured out how to change the priority on each individual text, but is there any way to change them where I dont have to change it on the individual message?

Hi and wecome to the forums!
options-mms text-priority
I only have sms text, but that's how to do it for my sms.
IrwinII
Please remember to "Accept as Solution" the post which solved your thread. If I or someone else have helped you, please tell us you "Like" what we had to say at the bottom right of the post.

High priority notification without pop up

Is there any way in workflow to send a high priority email notification to agent without the pop-up?

thanks for the reply Viji
I've done exactly as you guided but still in MSS inbox the notification is coming with Normal priority.
Although when I checked the workflow instance, the step is showing High priority.
I also tried to change the priority to Very High and Highest - Express but still inbox notification is showing normal priority, although everytime i can see in workflow instance that priority is changed to what I set, but its not reflecting in inbox.
Plz help.

Give LAN higher priority than wireless / deactivate wireless if LAN is connected

Hi.
What I want to do is quite simple: Im my office there is a quite fast LAN connection and a rather poor wireless connection. Therefore, I want to tell my device: "If there is a LAN cable plugged in, just use LAN. Do not use Wifi in this case. If there is no LAN cable plugged in, try to connect to Wifi."
It is really annoying to change that manually each time.
I have already changed the network connection priority in Windows 7 as described here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2526067
But to no avail.
My notebook is E531.
Wifi Device: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230
Driver Date 30.09.2012
Driver Version 15.3.1.2
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi cis,
do you by any chance have Access Connections installed on your system? It is possible that the WLAN adapter is set to a higher priority than LAN in your location profile which is causing the behaviour. If you don't have AC installed it may be a possible solution you could try.
Link to another thread on this subject;
http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkVantage-Technologies/Access-Connections-disable-WiFi-on-Wired-Conne...
Andy ______________________________________
Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
PepperonI blog

QoS on e4200 - High priority though my speed has halved! :(

Hi there,
I have a 100mbps connection at home and i've set up QoS to ensure my main PC gets the run of the bandwidth.
However with my main PC set to high priority, I'm only getting just over 50mbps.
Any ideas as to why this is?
Thank you!

Hi, Pizzimperfect. Try theMedia Prioritization Settings andmanually change the Downstream and Upstream Bandwidth to "0".

How to assign higher priority for labview while running other applications.

HI,
I am performing 2 time critical counter operations. I am using software time due to the hardware limitation of PCI6013(I have tried all other options). My problem is that I get a erractic value when I use mouse, keyboard or change to other application.
I found the following link providing a method to provide maximum priority to labview application.But even regular labview users are asked not to use this application. I am not even a regular LABview user.Is there any precaution that I should take to use this VI. I am in need of such an application very badly. Please Help.
http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&RPAGEID=135&HOID=506500000008000000F5880000&UCATEGORY_0=_1
5_&UCATEGORY_S=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_TIER_0=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_TIER_S=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_0=priority&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_S=0

"Is there any precaution that I should take to use this VI."
Yes many,
When you start to experiment with settings priorities in an attempt to avoid the affects of mouse clicks, then you should brace yourself for the application appearing hung. This would happen if LV had a higher priority than the mouse interupt service routine.
Same applies to the other conditions you mentioned.
If you go this route, backup before you experiment! Some strange things can happen to your file system.
I have talked to you about this challenge of yours in another thread. This is what I recomend.
1) If you can live with your readings being made on only one gear at a time, AND the sample rate being aperiodic, then you MAY be able to use DAQ Occurances and two session. I
have not done this myself, and AM NOT SURE if it can be done or if you hardare supports it, but maybe;
a) Open two references to your and configure A so it uses hardware timing (like you already said works good) to count gear A using the other counter as the gate. On the other session you are counting gear B.
b) Configure both of the above to fire occurances when done.
c)Start only session A.
d) When A occurance fires start B.
e) When B fires start A, etc.
This will give you determinism on the counts and effectively shift the indeterminism to the update interval.
If this is not good enough then there is another option. Can you get yourself a nice solid external reference that you can apply as an external gate to both counters? If so you will be using hardware timing and you should be on the right track.
If these do not work out, you may end up having to go to different hardware.
Just trying to help,
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Create at runtime a job to run at the central instance with high priority

Hi All
Using the function modules ( job_open, job_submit and job_close ) or ( job_open, submit via job jobname number jobcount, job_close) I need that this job runs in the central instance and with high priority.
I would like to know how to inform it using the statements above? How to pass the parameters to make the job run in the central instance with high priority?
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.
João Gaia

Hi
I hadn't realized about the parameter TARGETSERVER of the function module JOBCLOSE. I am going to make some tests.
thanks in advance

In R12 how to change concurrent output/log file name prefix?

how to change concurrent output/log file name prefix?

but i want to change change concurrent output/log file name prefix?You cannot, and I believe it is not supported for all concurrent requests -- Please log a SR to confirm this with Oracle support.
Thanks,
Hussein

High Priority, Change PO output enhancement / userexit?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for