High priority notification without pop up

Is there any way in workflow to send a high priority email notification to agent without the pop-up?

thanks for the reply Viji
I've done exactly as you guided but still in MSS inbox the notification is coming with Normal priority.
Although when I checked the workflow instance, the step is showing High priority.
I also tried to change the priority to Very High and Highest - Express but still inbox notification is showing normal priority, although everytime i can see in workflow instance that priority is changed to what I set, but its not reflecting in inbox.
Plz help.

Similar Messages

Very High Priority Notification Numbers

We want to calculate the % of notifications having priority very high. Formulae is clear but from where can we get the total count of notifications and count of notifications having "very high" priority ? Is there any table where we can get this count ?
Regards
VM

VM,
Is this for every notification in the database (PM, CS, QM) and all statuses (NOPR, NOCO, etc) and every plant, etc?
Otherwise you will need to limit your data further
PeteA

Why is time-critical thread not interrupting sleepless high priority thread?

Hello,
I have two threads running in the same execution system on a real-time PXI platform. The time-critical thread sleeps using "AI Single Scan.VI", and acquires my data at a rate of 8000 Hz.
I have a slower high priority process that calls a DLL function to calculate some filter coefficients. This function call takes longer than 1/8000 s to complete, and runs in a loop, executing as often as it can (with new data from FIFOs).
I expected the time-critical thread to interrupt the the high priority thread without problem.
I am finding that unless I insert a LabVIEW delay (for example a wait for x ms VI) in the loop, the real-time system stops responding. With a small delay (ie 1 ms), t
he acquisition completes, and a FIFO shuts down the loop of the slow process.
Why do I need a labVIEW delay in the high-priority loop, when the DLL function call itself is quite slow? Even without a DLL call, I would expect the time-critical VI to interrupt, finish its data acquisition, and shut-down the high-priority thread using its FIFO.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Frenk

Here are a couple things to try/check:
1) Check the call library node in your high priority VI. If it's orange (runs in UI thread), your high priority VI is actually switching to the UI thread every time your dll runs. That alone is not a problem. But if your TC VI tries to update any control terminals, the TC thread will switch over to the UI thread to access UI resources, possibly while the dll within your high priority VI has a lock on those resources. Why does the dll have a lock on UI resources? Because it was running in the UI thread and got interrupted by the TC thread before it finished doing its business. Not likely, but possible.
2) There's another possible reason you're seeing this behavior. If the TC VI and the high VI call a mutual subVI, the subVI will be elevated to ALWAYS run in the highest priority thread irrespective of the actual caller (in your case, it's the the TC thread). Even when the *high priority VI* calls the mutual subVI, that subVI runs in the time-critical thread, which means there's a thread switch from high to TC, then back to high after the subVI finishes. And because high and TC VIs are in the same exec system, that mutual subVI will always run in the 1 and only TC thread alotted to that exec system.
So, while your TC VI is running, you're in the TC thread. While, your high VI is running, you're in a high non-TC thread, and when your high VI calls the mutual subVI, you're again in the TC thread until the subVI finishes.
So how could this arrangement cause your TC VI to become starved by the high VI? If your TC VI wakes up while the high VI is in the middle of running the mutual subVI, the TC thread responsible for running the TC VI is actually busy (in the middle of running the subVI in your high VI!!!), so the TC thread cannot run your TC VI until it finishes running that mutual subVI.
The fix: make your TC VI run in a different exec system. It will be given its own TC thread that no one else can mess with. When TC VI wakes up, it's guaranteed a TC thread.
I think there's a good reason behind why a mutual subVI ALWAYs runs at the highest priority of all its callers, irrespective of the actual caller's priority...but I can't think of the reason at the moment.

Query:Pop up on login for incomplete high priority tasks in sap inbox

Hi All,
I am having requirement to display pop up for incomplete high priority in sap inbox on loging in sap.
I wil be thankful if you can guide to fulfill this requirement.
Thanks.

Hi,
To get the High priority work items you can use the table SWWWIHEAD.
using this table you can get the Priority, Status, and agent of the work item. Using this you can build the logic to
display the pop up with this details.
Thanks,
Viji.

Can I make "High Priority" default - or is there a script?

Hi,
When sending an email, is there a way to choose to mark the message as "High Priority" without having to go up the the "Message" menu to do so? If there isn't a keyboard shortcut, is there a script out there anywhere that can do that?
Patrick

not important to me any more

Workflow: Setting the high priority flag

Hi,
Does any one know how to set the priority for the email notification?
(Eg: In microsoft outlook red exclamatory mark for high priority)
I tried the option priority in notification and message but its not giving the desired output(i.e Flag).

I know you can set the priority on the task.
If you click on the User step and go under Routes and Priority, you can change the priority and you will see a different icon in Workspace.
I'm not sure this will change the priority on the email though.
Jasmin

High priority code

Hi,
I am writing a code in LabView-10, where there is a camera involved. I need it to go to a particular temperature before I should close it. If my program works fine, I have a part at the end of the code that does this job.
My problem is, if the program crashes for some reason (for parts that does not involve camera), or even if someone hit the stop execution button, the program stops abruptly and that part of the code is not being executed.
Is there a way to make something like a "High Priority" part of a code, that will always be executed no matter how the program stops.
Or any other idea that can solve this problem.
Thanks.

You need to actually code in proper error handling as well as handle how the application exits. If the code is crashing it is a sign of bugs in the code and the code should be robust enough to detact and handle errors. Without seeing your code it is impossible to give you any advice on how to improve it but from your description you basically have buggy code. You need to fix the bugs.
As for catching exit events you should detect them explicitly. NEVER allow the user to use the abort button to stop your program. It is an imediate abort and doesn't allow you to clean up. Its the equilivant of stopping your car by rnning into a wall. It will stop the car but it certainly isn't advised. You should use an explicit stop/exit button on your front panel. You can use the event structure to detect that the user has signaled a stop and then perform your normal cleanup. The event structure can also detect when the user stops the code using the X (Windows close) and again perform the necessary cleanup.
Mark Yedinak
"Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald - Gordon Lightfoot

High Priority External mail

Hi Experts,
We are using external mails for PO deadline notification and this is working fine. Now they have asked for high priority mail in Outlook.Is it possib to sent a high priority mail to external Id.
Regards,
Hari

Hi Hari,
do you mean, you want high priority mail (Importance High mail) in Outlook side,
or you mean once deadline is done you want to send mail to Outlook.
If its the first case, then I think you need to ask the MS Exchange Server people to try configure any mail coming from SAP as high.
If its the second case, then you have Extended Notifications or RSWUWFML2 report which could send mails to Outlook.
Hope it helps.
Aditya

Priority 1 Workitem: Pop Up to be blocked

Hi all.
I have a std task with priorty 1. A user who is getting the pop up does not want them. He wants the workitem minus the pop up. Is that possible ? if yes how?
And its interesting to know that some of the recievers of the same workitem (basically its a activity with sendtaskdescription) are not getting the pop ups!!
Please reply as its kind of urgent .
Thanks!
Anuj Sethi
Message was edited by:
Anuj Sethi

> Well first of all priority can`t be changed as it has to be a Priority 1 task.
> Secondly if one user gets a pop up and other doesn`t then I think it actually might be possible !!
>
Can't help you with the question, but I know it has been discussed before, so I would encourage you to search (use Google, it is actually easier to find many of the threads there than in the SDN search - just limit the search with search criteria "site:.sap.com").
Of course, there's always the ultimate response of: debug - but I think someone had a pretty close look at it in one of the other threads. My <u>guess</u> is that there is nothing you can do about it, because it is the task it self that has high priority, so it is high priority independently of who receives it.
> > Please define "kind of urgent".
> Coz the enduser is writing 5 mails a day to me ! It might not be urgent for anyone else in the forum (Fully Agree with that ) but quick response will help me a big way !!
>
That isn't really related to urgency at all in my opinion. It would be urgent if you had to fix it within a certain time, that's why I was asking - because that word is misused a lot here in SDN. OK, it's a pain in your butt with all those e-mails, but other than you I honestly don't think anyone here cares about that.
Tell the nag (user) that you are looking into it and that answering his (or her) e-mails gives you less time available to look into the problem.

Can I give a process higher priority over another?

is there anyway that I can give a process higher priority over others? I'd like to give one of my programs higher priority so that it responds quicker to when my RF remote is pressed.

Open the Terminal.app in /Applications/Utilities/, type this into the window that pops up, and hit the return key, hit the space bar to scroll down until you get an (END) prompt, hit the Q key, and then read all about the command:
*man nice*

Create at runtime a job to run at the central instance with high priority

Hi All
Using the function modules ( job_open, job_submit and job_close ) or ( job_open, submit via job jobname number jobcount, job_close) I need that this job runs in the central instance and with high priority.
I would like to know how to inform it using the statements above? How to pass the parameters to make the job run in the central instance with high priority?
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.
João Gaia

Hi
I hadn't realized about the parameter TARGETSERVER of the function module JOBCLOSE. I am going to make some tests.
thanks in advance

EIM Auto pushback - requeue at higher priority?

Hello,
In our EIM 4.3.2(8) implementation (ICM Enterprise integrated queues and agents), all new and incomplete activites auto-pushback to queue after 8 hours (overnight generally). The problem with this is, they're getting pushed to the back of the queue. I'd like to have all auto-pushback emails queue at a higher priority so that during days of high email volume, we don't get stragglers that keep getting pushed to the end of the queue while newer emails get handled.
I saw this:
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Transferred_Emails_Get_Sent_To_End_of_Queue
and thought maybe I could pull some Activity related column through to ICM to act on to change the priority... Not sure what I should use though. I considered looking at the "WHEN_CREATED" field and upping the priority in ICM if that's more than a day ago, but I wonder if there is a simpler way to do this.
Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

New tasks are sent from EIM to ICM in order queue priority, activity priority and oldest - in that order. While sending new task there is no differentiation between new email first time in queue Vs email which is auto pushed back to queue, if queue and activity priority are same then oldest activity criteria will be honored.
There is no other way in default EIM product to push auto pushed back emails ahead of others.

Listing Items based on criteria e.g. High Priority Items First.

Hi,
One of our customers have a need to List High Priority Items first on the WebTools site.
Let's take two ItemCodes for example: Printer001, and, Monitor001.
>> If these two items are included in the same category then Monitor001 will appear before Printer001 as WebTools sorts in alphabetic ascending order;
>> But, our customer wants Printer001 to appear before Monitor001 as it is an Item higher in priority that Printer001.
I can think of two possible solutions:
1/2) Prefix Items with a number or letter to have it appear first in the WebTools default sort order. E.g. Rename "Monitor001" as "AMonitor001". This will not be possible for existing Items in SAP, so it doen't solve the issue,
Or,
2/2) Customize the Default WebTools Item List block to sort Items based on a User Define field called "pririty". Which might require a lot of effort.
Please advise if anyone else has solved similar issue and how.
Thanks very much for your replies in advance.

Hey Kafil ... I think you may be stuck modifying the parts list page or creating something from scratch. I'm not aware of an easy way to do this out of the box.

High priority bug to be solved very urgent

Hello Experts,
I need your help and plz close this topic once its solved.
Here is the problem:
There is report called "Material Group".When its is displayed for material gorup say "GB06010000" is displayed as part of report data wheras the source system (oracle ) does not have this item any more in the catalog. This indicated that data is not refreshed for quite a long time.
This report is connected to the third party application (oracle db) not EBP system(r/3). Time to time there has been deletion or addition catalog items and in all as of today there are 815 items, whereas BIW report displays 4204 items. How can i refresh this data to display 815 items.
how to solve this issue any ideas or suggestion????
the reports is on ODS level.
I hope all of u take this problem as urs and try to give me solution as earliest possible.
<b>this is high priority issue from client side</b>.
thanks in advance . Surely il assign the points.
email id: [email protected]
Urs,
Raki.

Hey Lilly,
Yep i have deleted the contents of ODS sucessfully and i have reloaded it sucesfully but from biw side there is no problem as i feel.
So i requested my onsite people to look in to the oracle db table how many records are available.Later then we will make take some decision .
So still the problem isnot solved il be updating this in another couple of days.So i request u to take care this issue and now i have assigned u points also.
Thanks for ur info.
Possible give me ur personal mail id so that i can direclty drop to ur mail.
Urs,
Raki

The technical name of 5GHz has high priority in dual band AP

Hi,
As I know, when open dual radio on some Cisco's AP, and configure one dual wireless client associate with the AP, the AP will use 5GHz for wireless client to associate first.
Does somebody know this technical or function name?
I'm looking for the AP which has this kind of function.
Thanks.
Walter

Hi Eric Moyers,
Thanks for your reply.
Sorry about describe not clearly.
For example:
1. Enable 2.4G and 5G on an AP, and configure both SSID on these 2 band with the same SSID "ciscosb" and security "WPA2-AES".
2. Configure a dual band wireless card to associate with an SSID "ciscosb". (specify the SSID in the profile)
3. AP will be associated via 5G band.
So 5G can has high priority to be used. Is this new design? or base on chip?
I have used WAP561 to perform the steps, but WAP561 was associated via 5G or 2.4G randomly.

High priority notification without pop up

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for