Higher Level Reporting in Controlling

Hi,
I will explain the requirement here
We have created the Co Codes and assigned these to multiple controlling areas(ASIA,EUROPE,AFRICA,USA) and the same which in turn assigned to Operationg Concern(single) across world wide.My questions are
Can I get the reports by controlling area ?
Can I get the each product report by controlling area wise ?
Can I get the report by Operating concern wise ?
Can I get report for each product wise by whole operating concern wise ?
Can I get the report of each product across multiple controlling areas wise ?
Please explain me how it is possible with std reports and t codes.
Better Answer will rewarded with good points.
Thanks,
Edu

Hi Edu,
Your query is vague.
Say, If you are looking for AR reports for all company codes in one Controlling Area, it is not possible.
You will not have Controlling area in the selection for AR reports.
However, you may get a single report for all cost centers in one Controlling area (all company codes that fall in the same Controlling Area).
It depends on each object and how the org structure is built in SAP.
Let me know if you need clarity.
Regards,
Som

Similar Messages

Inconsistency in upper level report and drill down report

I have to reports:
1) Higher level report pulls data against customers and shows aggregated data for all promotions for that customer from a table A.
2) Lower level report pulls data from the same table A, but for all promotions against a customer after i drill down on a Customer.
However, the values of a measure when summed up for a customer in the higher and lower level reports, does not match sometimes. Sometimes its in sync, sometimes its not.
My Oracle BI servers are 2 in no. with clustered configuration. Can this be an issue related to caching of measure values? If not, please give me pointers in other directions i can look.

clustering is not a problem here....just check for some example...and do some unit testing to find the rootcause of mismatch..it might be including some some extra values..

If a material reports to two higher level assemblies in the BOM /Is there a

Hi,
If a material reports to two higher level assemblies in the BOM would creates two planned orders for it. Each of the orders has a different date?
For example
Z is final assembly
In that Y is one assembly in that says X1material in level 2
And the again same material X1 is reporting to Y in levels 5 so here my question is it would create two planned order with different dates?
And
Is there any report to see confirmed time to say machine time / labor time or shall we go for report.
Thx....Srini

Srini,
CS15 can be usefull to check the usage of component in assemblies.
if its used then more then once it can be easily located through this report.
another concern what you expressed is not clear.
But what i understand is same component is used at level 2 and level 4 of a BOM.
assumption from the word levels is , X is used in level 2 its used directly in BOM of Y and Y have some differnt component G which inturn again have X in it .
so at both this levels if the dependent requirement is different, you can get 2 differnet orders use individual /collective indicvator for this material as individual .
If your concern is for BOM position (Item Number) field in BOM then system will create a single plan order even if you set it for individual requirement in material master.here some work around can be possible by maintaining lead time offset IN BOM in item detail screen.
check and come back
Hope it helps you
Regards
Ritesh

Role level mitigating controls not affecting position level reports

Hi,
Here's the problem we're having with mitigating controls:
When I assign a mitigating control to a role, it correctly mitigates the risk when we perform a role level SoD analysis. However, when we perform a position level analysis, the same role shows up again in the report as not mitigated. Anyone else running into this issue? We are on CC5.2 with SP4. Is this fixed in later SPs?
Simple Example:
Role ABC has conflicting tcodes FBV0 and FBVB. We applied a mitigating control to this role and it doesn't show up anymore on the role level reports.
When running the position level SoD analysis, position number 50010000 contains role ABC and the same conflict shows up again even though the conflict is entirely within Role ABC and not with other roles that are in position 50010000.
Thanks,
Robert

All,
I opened a customer message with SAP and it seems that this issue is a limitation with CC 5.2 Mitigating at the role level will will not follow through to the position level reports. However, it seems that it will follow through to the user level as long as you have configured it under the Configuration->Additional Options tab. There is a setting there that will allow rule level mitigating controls to take affect at the user level.
Thanks,
Robert

High-Level LabView Control System Engineer Job Opening - Seattle

High-Level LabView Control System Engineer Job Opening - Seattle
Seattle Safety is looking for a qualified individual to fill an opening for Senior Software Controls Engineer. Seattle Safety designs, manufactures, and installs advanced crash test sled systems that are used in automotive and aeronautical industries. The duties of the Controls Engineer include:
Maintain existing control software code base, written in LabVIEW (including the Real-Time Module).
Improve existing software based on requirements and requests from customers and colleagues.
Troubleshoot and repair any functional software bugs that may arise.
Continuously investigate opportunities for system improvement through new or alternative hardware or software approaches.
Support installations of crash test equipment at on-site locations worldwide.
Provide technical support for team members locally and abroad in subject matters concerning performance, installation, and maintenance of software and data acquisition hardware.
Maintain professional relationships with suppliers and vendors in order to keep up with industry developments.
Furthermore, the ideal candidate would possess the following skills:
Intermediate-to-advanced knowledge of LabVIEW.
Ability to analyze empirical data against theoretical predictions to enhance and improve mathematical model of system.
Familiarity with data acquisition concepts and hardware.
Ability to troubleshoot electrical and electronic systems at the module and equipment level.
Discipline and organization with respect to software maintenance and version management. Experience with source configuration management tools a plus (CVS, ClearCase, Perforce, etc.)
Experience with sophisticated high-speed feedback control systems
General skills in areas such as frequency domain analysis, systems analysis, digital filtering, and both linear and non-linear signal processing.
BSEE, BSME or BS Physics may be a good fit, but not limited to these areas.
Ability to work both alone and with colleagues to solve problems and to weigh the merits of differing approaches.
Pay is commensurate with skills and qualifications of the applicant.
Contact:
Seattle Safety
Tom Wittmann
(253)395-4321
1222 6th Av N
Kent, WA 98032
[email protected]
Attachments:
ServoSled Brochure.pdf ‏1215 KB

Dear Sir / Madam,
I am an experienced engineering professional skilled in Post Silicon Validation by Automating using LabVIEW, Power Measurements, Jitter Measurement & Analysis, Audio Characterizations, Silicon Validation Test Cases, Multi-Channel Data acquisition and Triggering using NI DAQ Cards, Control Systems, Serial Communications using VISA and Serial I/O Interface, Code Native Interfaces, Call Library functions to interface with third party and custom dlls, ATMEL and PIC Micro Controller programming, Temperature Controllers like Honeywell, ESPEC-641, TestEquity 115, Hand held terminal programming to drive servo motors, C/C++/VB Programming for developing embedded applications.
Good experience on Windows API, protocol implementations, ARM11 & ARM7TDMI on-chip programming using Register Map and Pinout Specs using C/C++ Metrowerks Code Warrior and MULTI-ICE for ARM Debugger.
Looking for L1/H1 Job
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please find an attachment of my resume in MS-Word format.
Sincerely yours,
K.Sowjanya. B.Tech
Message Edited by Support on 04-04-2008 08:39 AM

HDMI Audio not working on Q190 (along with all higher level Audio Formats)

Help, I have been given the run around via support, I cannot get the HDMI audio to work with my Pioneer Surround Sound, only the Intel display audio shows in control panel (Win 8 X64) and the RealteK S/P Dif port and it is not capable of supporting 7.1 sound or bitstreaming or DTS, Dolby HD, Etc. Tec support appears not capable of fixing the issue and wanted to send me to software support and pay. I have only had the machine for 4 days and it has never supported higher level sound.
Every other device I have (had or currently) connected to the receiver works just fine. I have to figure this out or return the machine, the audio is the most important aspect for me. Besides when you advertise 7.1 support the machine you sell should be able to do it.

Hey guys,
I have had this Q190 with the Celeron CPU since last week and I am using XBMC Frodo and the HDMI is connected to my AVR Onkyo TX-NR809 and from the Onkyo to the TV. And the sound is 7.1 with PLIIZ. It works fine. I think it may be some driver problem because Realtek Audio which is in the Q190 works fine with the Win8 preinstalled. Realtek is kind of bad with driver because I lost my wifi after upgrading to Win 8.1. After a few days with no wifi, I found out that the driver was bad, yes it was a Realtek wifi driver but posted by Lenovo for W 8.1.
I have another friend who also just bought the Q190 and he reported no audio problem so I think it is just a matter of trouble shooting the drive and configuration. I do love the form factor of the Q190.

High level overview and key features - Urgent

Dear all Hi,
Please suggest me some points a i have to prepere one single slide PPT indicating the PP's high level overview and key features.
Please help
thanks in advance.

You coverthe overall general cyle involved in PP like
1 Receipt of sale order
2 MRP
3 Production Planning
4 Shop Floor Control(Planned order to prod order,Capacity planning,GI,Confirmation,GR,Settlement)
Key Features
1 Highlight the features of MRP
2 Capacity Evaluvation/Planning
3 Reports etc
Hope this is useful
Revert back if you have any further queries
Reward points if useful
Regards,
SVP

Basic XML Publisher Question: How to access tags in the higher levels?

Hi All,
We have a basic question in XML Publisher.
We have a xml hierarchy like below:
<CD_CATALOG>
<CATALOG>
<CAT_NAME> CATALOG 1</CAT_NAME>
<CD>
<TITLE>TITLE1 </TITLE>
<ARTIST>ARTIST1 </ARTIST>
</CD>
<CD>
<TITLE> TITLE2</TITLE>
<ARTIST>ARTIST2 </ARTIST>
</CD>
</CATALOG>
<CATALOG>
<CAT_NAME> CATALOG 2</CAT_NAME>
<CD>
<TITLE>TITLE3 </TITLE>
<ARTIST>ARTIST3 </ARTIST>
</CD>
<CD>
<TITLE> TITLE4</TITLE>
<ARTIST>ARTIST4 </ARTIST>
</CD>
</CATALOG>
</CD_CATALOG>
We need to create a report like below:
CATALOG_NAME     CD_TITLE     CD_ARTISTCATALOG 1     TITLE1     ARTIST1
CATALOG 1     TITLE2     ARTIST2
CATALOG 2     TITLE3     ARTIST3
CATALOG 2     TITLE4     ARTIST4
So we have to loop at the level of <CD> using for-each CD. But when we are inside this loop, we cannot access the value of CAT_NAME which is at a higher level.
How can we solve this?
Right now, we are using the work-around of set_variable and get_Variable. We are setting the value of CAT_NAME inside an outer loop, and using it inside the inner loop using get_variable.
Is this the proper way to do this or are there better ways to do this? We are running into troubles when the data is inside tables.

you can use
<?../CAT_NAME?>copy past to your template
<?for-each:CD?> <?../CAT_NAME?> <?TITLE?> <?ARTIST?> <?end for-each?>

Change Higher Level Item of the Sub-Item in Repair Order

Hello
We have a in-house-Repair order created from Compliant.
This repair order has main Line Item of type 'Repair Request' having Item no 1000.
From this Line, we are creating new main lines 'Return for Repair' 1001
and 'Diagonsis' lines 1002 through Actions(appearing as buttons on the Items Assignment Block).
Both these lines have Higher Level Item as 1000.
From the Diagonsis 1002 line, we are generating new Debit Memo line 1003(higher as 1002 ) by selecting a new button . This is billable and to be charged to the Customer in ECC.
How do I change the Parent/Higher Level Item value from 1002 to 1001(Return for Repair) for charging the Customer.
I found an action used for generating the Debit Line in CRM.
Please advice on how to achive this functionality.. Is this possible ?
Cheers
RJ
Note: I am new Tech Guy in Service area.
Edited by: Remo J on Jul 30, 2011 11:00 PM

Hi Remo,
Did you implement the in-house repairs completely?
Did you also work on ECC billing and controlling integrations?
would really appreciate your response on this.
Regards,
Itisha

Fonts are not diplayed correctly in the Crystal Report Viewer control

Post Author: Farid
CA Forum: General
Hello,
I have designed a report in the Crystal Reports XI Designer (version 11.5.3.417) using the default printer. When I view it through the preview mode of the Designer, fonts are displayed like expected using the default printer driver.
Now, I view this same report at run time in the Crystal Report Viewer control on the same computer with the same default printer. Fonts appear then differently they were in the preview mode : sizes are differents and some texts are truncated. It seems that the default printer driver are not used.
Can anybody tell me if this behaviour is normal ? If it is the case how should I do to display a report in the Report Viewer using the default printer driver like I have specified it in the Designer.

Post Author: V361
CA Forum: General
You may want to select the "no Printer" option instead, this will force CR to use a higher resolution. Look in page setup, printer options.

How to change the order of cascading prompt?[The prompt at higher level appears at TOP]

Hi Guys,
I have one doubt in cascading prompt without Hierarchy view in UNIVERSE 3.1
While running a report with it.
The prompt at higher level appears below the prompt at lower level.How can we change the order,i.e, I want Level 2 Account Code as top and then Level 3 Account Code ?
It can achieve in hierarchy view,but i don't want to set it as hierarchy view,because there are huge number of Level 2 Account code[Search pattern is not available too]
Thanks in Advance
Shenbu

Hi Sathish,
Thanks for your reply.
I created Cascading list of value as you said only.please find below screenshot for your refefrence.
I think,its tool limitation as "The prompt at higher level appears below the prompt at lower level in report".Can any other way is there to achieve?

How to automat. copy configuration of higher level material to sub-item

Hi Experts,
I have Make to Order Scenario.
My customer wants the configuration of the non-phantom sub-items in the sales order to be automatically copied from the configuration of the higher level material.
I have added the ZCOPY function module( to copy configuration) to the configuration profile of the sub-item but the program flow does not go through the function module because sub-item has a link to higher level material.
If I go to the configuration of the sub-item in VA02, it appears a message u201CThe item configuration can only be changed by that higher level materialu201D. All chosen characteristics of the higher level material are shown, actually configuration of the higher level material is shown because of the link. But in CU44 of that sub-item, sales order no
Characteristics are selected.
Any suggestion how and where to place automatic copy of the configuration of the higher level material to the sub-item?
Kind regards,
Danijela Zivanovic

Vivek & Madhava
    Thank you for your comments. I know that adding A's routing to B is the best simple way to solve the problem. But as a little part of our global firm, our plant can't change master data related to cost calculation so easy. Every chance should be verified by global cost control team. And the routing is B is already very complex, we don't want to make it more complex.
    As same, create another material code is not available too because this should be considered by global team.
    Currently, we are creating production order for A separately. And A was looked as a component in B's production order. So, there are 2 production orders should be deal with. In fact, these two orders should be done at same time. It was complained by shop floor that too much order confirmation work to do. Warehouse complains too. And further, this way disturbs production planning very much due to the system will not always plans these 2 orders together.
Regards
Robbie

How to edit the Servicve Level Report?

Folks,
Our customer would like to have a Service Level Report (SLR) from the Solution MAnager.
However the first chapter on page 1 called "Solution Landscape Alert Overview" (with some EWA alert warnings) must be deleted from the SLR.
How can we edit the report to delete this chapter?
Is this possible, and if yes; how?
Regards,
Joris

Thanks for the suggestion.
However the part I want to remove cannot be controlled in that way. It simply is not in the checkboxes.
Isn't there a way to go deeper in the SLR and 'hack' out the parts you don't want?
The normal way (via checkboxes) doesn't let you control all chapter in the SLR.
Regards,
Joris

How to get DIVISION wise report in Controlling?

Hi,
How to get DIVISION wise report in Controlling? I am not trying to get Division in COPA report but i am not able to see Division Characteristic in Operating concern Data structure.
Kindly help me - where can i get good Controlling report with Division wise? why i am not able to see the Division characteristic in COPA report?
Thanks
Kishore

HI,
Check this:
KEA0 ->Data stucture (Display) ->Extras(Menu) -> Display fixed fields. In this pop-up you will see 'Division' (SPART).
If this field is defined as Segment level characteristic (KEQ3), then you can build reports on this characteristic using KE35.
Hope this helps.

Cumulation of lower level item prices to higher level items

Hi,
We have a specific requirement that we use high-level materials that is not relevant for pricing and lower level items connected to higher-level item that are RA and billing relevant. How do we modify the pricing procedure to cumulate (roll-up) the lower level items to higher level item which is not price relevant but statistical value should be updated at this level for billing purpose.
We want to achieve this using/modifying only pricing procedure and not via user exit..
Request SAP experts to provide some inputs to this issue..
BR/Rajasekhar

Hi rajsekhar
But generally if you want to transfer the cost of the sub item to main item then you can check the box Cumulative cost in copy control VTFL . But your requirement is quite opposite .So you need to go to assign a New Reqt / Alt calc type to the cond type , telling that the header item cost which is not relevant for pricing has to be transferred to sub item .So you need to integrate with the ABAP'er to give inputs to him and giving our requirement also
Regards
Srinath

Higher Level Reporting in Controlling

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for