Historical Reporting UCCX 8.5 (1)

Help Help Help !!!!! Urgent
we have meeting with client who is running UCCX7.0 and needs to upgrade UCCX8.5 (1). The question he migh ask about historical reporting. If they backup the current UCCX 7.0 historic reports data on sql 7 , How we restore to new UCCX 8.5 ?? How reporting in UCCX 8.5 (1) works ? What sort of reports store on UCCX historix reporting section? How it is true that historical reporting stores inside UCCX 8.5 (1) box ?? Please provide little introduction about reporting in related to above scenario. Thanks

HI Hafiz,
UCCX 7.0 uses SQL databases to save the historcal data, and UCCX 8.x versions use Informix DB to save the historical data.
When you perform the UCCX 7.0(1)_SR5 upgrade to UCCX 8.5(1), using Windows to Linux upgrade (or W1 upgrade) it takes the backup of the entire UCCX 7.0(1)_SR5 box using PUT (Pre Upgrade Tool) including your historical data.
As part of the restore, you need to install the UCCX 8.5 freshly, and restore the earlier backed up data which will restore your Historical data as well.
Please refer the below upgrade link for the step by step procedure of this upgrade path,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_8_5/installation/guide/uccx851_ug.pdf
Please note that you need to upgrade the HRCclient (by uninstalling the older version and installing it newly from the UCCX 8.5 system) to view the HRC reports in UCCX 8.5 version.
Hope it helps.
Anand
Please rate the helpful posts by clicking on the stars below the right answers !!

Similar Messages

Historical Reports UCCX 7.0

Hi,
When I run a query with CCX Historical Report, for example on the activity by CSQ, I see all the CSQ and the CSQ removed.
This problem also exists for the agents. I found all the device that have been deleted.
Is this normal ?
How to completely remove these elements ?
I encounter this problem with two UCCX 7.0.
Anyhow, any help would be appriciated.
Thanks
Romuald

Hi Romuald,
The only way to remove the CSQ's as you suggest is to remove the "appearance" in the filter list of the historical report generator. Then you will have to use the Filters when creating the report. The CSQ's are perminent in the database and removing them manually is not supported nor is it advised. But by changing the query in the reporting template you can remove the CSQ appearances in the historical reporting client. Note, this is done on the HRC Client machine, not on the Server...
I have done this before for application names. So for instance, the ICD_Application_Summary_en_us.xml file which is located under c:\program files\Cisco CCX Historical Reporting\Report Templates\en_US has a SELECT query that appears like the following:
SELECT distinct applicationname FROM db_cra.dbo.contactcalldetail where applicationname not in ('')
If I wanted to change the appearance of what is displayed in the filter list I would change this in the following way:
SELECT distinct applicationname FROM db_cra.dbo.contactcalldetail where applicationname not in ('') and applicationname not in ('Advertising_Acct_Main') and applicationname not in ('Advertising_Accounting_CustSVC')
So for your issue, to remove CSQ appearances you will likely have to do the same thing but in something like the ICD_Detailed_Call_CSQ_Agent_en_us.xml or if the reports you are running are using a different template you will need to edit those. In that file you will find the SQL select statement:
SELECT distinct csqname FROM db_cra.dbo.contactservicequeue
So you would need to change that to something like the following:
SELECT distinct csqname FROM db_cra.dbo.contactservicequeue where csqname not in ('') and csqname not in ('CSQ1') and csqname not in ('CSQ2')
In this way you will exclude the CSQ's from showing up in the filter list. Someone can run the reports and select all the CSQ's in the filter list and this should exclude the ones you do not want on the report.
Please let me know if you have any questions about this and if this has been helpful please rate the post.
Thanks
Mike

Custom Historical Report UCCX 8.5 requirement question

Hi,
I'am reading on how to creat custom historical report in UCCX 8.5 and I've read that we need to use crystal reports for this. With this I was reading the cisco documentation about this http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_8_5/programming/guide/uccx85hradm.pdf
under page 4-2 Creating Report - where it states that To create a DSN to Informix server, HRC must be installed on the client machine where we need to create reports
I' am just confuse as to what this HRC means? And why it is needed?

Hi
HRC = Historical Reports Client
You don't really need it to get a DB conncection of course, but it does include the ODBC drivers which you'd have to obtain elsewhere and install to get connected. So it's easier if you do - and also you'd want to test the report that you create with the HRC client so that other people can use it... again, easier if you have HRC installed.
Regards
Aaron
Please rate helpful posts..

UCCX 7.0.1SR5 to 8.0 upgrade while also adding LDAP integration for CUCM - what happens to agents and Historical Reporting data?

Current State:
•    I have a customer running CUCM 6.1 and UCCX 7.01SR5. Currently their CUCM is *NOT* LDAP integrated and using local accounts only. UCCX is AXL integrated to CUCM as usual and is pulling users from CUCM and using CUCM for login validation for CAD.
•    The local user accounts in CUCM currently match the naming format in active directory (John Smith in CUCM is jsmith and John Smith is jsmith in AD)
Goal:
•    Upgrade software versions and migrate to new hardware for UCCX
•    LDAP integrate the CUCM users
Desired Future State and Proposed Upgrade Method
Using the UCCX Pre Upgrade Tool (PUT), backup the current UCCX 7.01 server.
Then during a weekend maintenance window……
•    Upgrade the CUCM cluster from 6.1 to 8.0 in 2 step process
•    Integrate the CUCM cluster to corporate active directory (LDAP) - sync the same users that were present before, associate with physical phones, select the same ACD/UCCX line under the users settings as before
•    Then build UCCX 8.0 server on new hardware and stop at the initial setup stage
•    Restore the data from the UCCX PUT tool
•    Continue setup per documentation
At this point does UCCX see these agents as the same as they were before?
Is the historical reporting data the same with regards to agent John Smith (local CUCM user) from last week and agent John Smith (LDAP imported CUCM user) from this week ?
I have the feeling that UCCX will see the agents as different almost as if there is a unique identifier that's used in addition to the simple user name.
We can simplify this question along these lines
Starting at the beginning with CUCM 6.1 (local users) and UCCX 7.01. Let's say the customer decided to LDAP integrate the CUCM users and not upgrade any software.
If I follow the same steps with re-associating the users to devices and selecting the ACD/UCCX extension, what happens?
I would guess that UCCX would see all the users it knew about get deleted (making them inactive agents) and the see a whole group of new agents get created.
What would historical reporting show in this case? A set of old agents and a set of new agents treated differently?
Has anyone run into this before?
Is my goal possible while keeping the agent configuration and HR data as it was before?

I was doing some more research looking at the DB schema for UCCX 8.
Looking at the Resource table in UCCX, it looks like there is primary key that represents each user.
My question, is this key replicated from CUCM or created locally when the user is imported into UCCX?
How does UCCX determine if user account jsmith in CUCM, when it’s a local account, is different than user account jsmith in CUCM that is LDAP imported?
Would it be possible (with TAC's help most likely) to edit this field back to the previous values so that AQM and historical reporting would think the user accounts are the same?
Database table name: Resource
The Unified CCX system creates a new record in the Resource table when the Unified CCX system retrieves agent information from the Unified CM.
A Resource record contains information about the resource (agent). One such record exists for each active and inactive resource. When a resource is deleted, the old record is flagged as inactive; when a resource is updated, a new record is created and the old one is flagged as inactive.

Not able to generate UCCX Historical Report of one agent

Dear All,
I am not able to generate the UCCX Historical report of the agent as the Historical reports of the agent is generating upto the Feburary 2013 but we are not able to view the Historical Report of March 2013 and onwards, the realtime reports are generating and the agent name is added to the Active Directory only once, help is required in this regard.
Best Regards,
Durraze Khan

Rajesh,
Put a breakpoint and try to debug the report step by step.
You will findout the reason very easily.
Whenever you have a select and are trying to append into an internal table, keep checking your internal table if it is been populated with the correct records.
This way, you will findout the cause and can correct is accordingly.
Thanks,
Suresh Ganti

UCCX 9.0(2) Historical reports

We recently upgraded to UCCX 9.0(2) and now use the CUIC for historical reports. So far it seems like a step backwards in terms of ease of use and flexibility in running various reports.
Our Call Center is open from 7 AM to 7 PM M-F. I want to run a CSQ activity report that shows the number of inbound calls after 5 PM over the last 60 days. Seems fairly straight forward, but have not been able to figure out how to capture this information. I choose the absolute time frame of 4/23/14 to 6/23/14 (60 days) and then choose the starting time as 5 PM and ending time as 11:59 PM. This gives me results that I know are not correct as the volume is extremely high. I believe what the report is capturing is from 5 PM on 4/23 and running through 11:59 PM on 6/23.
Anyone know how to run report to capture the data I am looking for? Thanks in advance.

It was working when using together with HRC? By any change it was a customized reporting?
If not mistaken there was a recent post on how to customize it to only capture calls during office hours and non office hour
Thanks!
-JT-

UCCX Historical Reporting - Transferred Calls

Hi All,
I've hit a brick wall in a UCCX script I'm currently working on. My client has requested stats on where agents are transferring calls. It's an operator-type position and it's fairly important to the client that she be able to guage the call volume to particular extensions.
I've gone through the majority of the standard report templates in UCCX Historical Reporting but haven't found anything suitable. I did notice that the "Agent Call Summary" report states the number of transferred called by a particular agent but not the extension the call were transferred to.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
As always, thanks in advance.

What you want is essentially a custom cradle to grave report. I'm sure there are reporting packages that can do this but they are quite spendy.
You basically want to tie a UCCX session to the CDR records from the CUCM; if you are familiar with SQL that shouldn't be too much of a challenge. The trick is automating it.

UCCX historical reporting

Hi,
I have one query regarding uccx reporting.
In uccx suppose any user is configured as UCCX agent and he is not login in CAD, if user gets call in his ACD extension, will that call detail
be availabe in uccx historical reporting.
Regards,
Dinesh Joshi

Hi.
This post belongs to the Contact Center session.
Anyway, what do you mean that the "user is not an available choice"? Does the user have an account in CUCM?
G.

UCCX Historical Reporting Automated Install

Does anyone have any pointers on how to automate the install for UCCX Historical Reports? 7.01(504)

Hi Lisa
1) That report shows the hour period that had the most incoming calls to the whole system. That means all CSQs... what report are you comparing it to? That report may be for a single CSQ that is busy in the afternoon, where the total for the system is higher in the morning.
2) No, there is not. You would need a custom report to produce this if it is important.
Regards
Aaron HarrisonPrincipal Engineer at Logicalis UK
Please rate helpful posts...

UCCX 7 Historical Reports Tool Question

Hi, I'm new to this tool and was wondering how I can see the report builds for the existing reports within the historical reports tool. Is there a way to get into the pre-existing reports using Crystal Developer? Any help and all help is appreciated.
Thanks,

Aaron,
One more thing. So when I get into the UCCX server to look at the data tables I notice that the table prefix (owner) is dbo. When I go into the reports design view and look at the database fields, their prefix is ado. Is there another table set out there or are there interim tables being created as these reports are running?
Regards,

UCCX V7 Historical Reports

Does anyone know how to to give standard users on UCCX V7 access to view historical reports , document id 51927 shows how to do it via the user configuration in the Tools>Historical Reporting Configuration page but the user configuration option is not available on V7.

Thanks for the replies and followed recommendations , user is pillingk in this example although no-one can log on , any ideas why the error is still occuring ?

Can Microsoft SSRS or IBM SPSS be used to customize UCCX Historical Reports?

Hello,
I have a client with UCCX 8.0 and is interested to know if Microsoft SSRS or IBM SPSS can be used as an alternative of Crystal Report to customize UCCX reports.
As I have limited knowledge on those products, wondering if someone else can provide some information on this.
FYI, I posted this on Developers Forum too, still waiting for responses.
Thanks,
Kapil

Hi,
if you want to keep the Historical Reporting Client provided by Cisco, then I am afraid Crystal is your only option.
If you don't mind setting up a separate platform, then you can use anything capable of talking to an IBM Informix server.
G.

UCCX Historical Reports client on my pc with two clusters 7x and 9x

I have two separate clusters, a 7x running UCCX 7x and we are building a new 9.1 cluster running UCCX 9x.
Can I install the new 9x UCCX Historical Reporting Client and talk to both clusters? I don’t think both old and new HRC clients can be installed on same pc, or can they?

Why would you use HRC with version 9.X? Is CUIC not an option?

UCCX Historical Reports Doubt

Hi ,
I have telephony setup running on CUCM 9.x integrated with UCCX 9.x.
Everything working fine and I can generate the Historical reports.
I have some doubts for generating the reports which is mentioned below.
1. Need to generate the agents abandoned calls,Placed calls and missed calls in a single report.I know i can generate these information's in two reports ,but required all this in a single report.Will it is possible?
2.When generating reports I required only external numbers information not required to show the internal numbers on the reports.Is there anyway I can uncheck the internal number while generating the HR?
Thanks inn advance
Nithin Louis.

Hi Nithinpro,
Answering your two question, there's not way to custom the information displayed in the HR report type.
One option to custom report is running Microsoft Silverlight but is not a easy task.
Check this link:http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_8_5/programming/guide/uccx85hradm.pdf
Regards

UCCX Historical Reports Not Accurately Filtered by Agent Name

Hello, we're having an odd problem when running our historical reports. When we filter a report by Agent Name only a couple of agents have any records. However when we filter the same report by skill or CSQ name the records for all agents are present, leading me to think that the records are not being tagged properly somewhere in the database. Has anyone seen this before or have any suggestions for resolving this?
For an example, if I run the Agent Call Summary report and filter by all of my agent names, I only get records for 3 people during the reporting period. If I filter based on CSQ name I get records for all 25 agents.
We are using UCCX version 8.02

I'm also having agents show in the filter list that are no longer in the system, and in at least one case reports filtered by a skill report an agent who is not assigned to that skill anymore. Are these symptoms a result of configuration in some way? I'm starting to feel like the reporting is buggy in this release.

Historical Reporting UCCX 8.5 (1)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for