Home doesn't look like A-Master

At the end of the tutorial, "...First Website, Part 1" the Home page doesn't look like A-Master. How can I fix that?

I sent the screenshots to [email protected] on 8/21/12 @ 11:09 PM with the Subj:
Forum=Adobe Muse/Help with using Adobe Muse. Really need the response to progress with myfirstwebsite, part 2.
Thanks in advance.

Similar Messages

HT4904 Help. I have an older 20 inch iMac and had Lion running on it but the internal hard drive died. I'm trying to install Lion on an external drive but it doesn't look like Lion Recovery is supported. I have Leopard installed but am stuck.

Hello,
My 20inch iMac's internal drive died and I'm trying to re-install Lion on an external drive. If I could get the Lion DMG file I think I'd be all set but am not sure how to do this. It doesn't look like the Lion Recovery feature is supported in my older iMac. And I have Leopard installed on the external drive but there's no AppStore to download the Lion DMG file.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
-Lee

Without a bootable backup/clone or a Time Machine backup of your previous Snow Leopard installation or a saved copy of Lion's install app, you'll have to upgrade your Leopard volume to Snow Leopard (10.6.6+) so you can waste another hour or more DLing the Lion thing again.

I upgraded my new iPad (iPad 3) to IOS 6 and everything went well except Siri won't launch apps. When asked say "launch Facebook" Siri responds with "it doesn't look like you have an app named Facebook" and I get the same results when trying to launch any

I upgraded my new iPad (iPad 3) to IOS 6 and everything went well except Siri won’t launch apps. When asked say “launch Facebook” Siri responds with “it doesn’t look like you have an app named Facebook” and I get the same results when trying to launch any app. Siri works for everything else it just won’t launch apps. Any ideas? Thanks.

I have this same problem... Seems like nobody else does. Siri won't launch any apps for me, including native apps.

Settings for a 1280 x 720 video (720p) that doesn't look like garbage?

I've been toying around for a while, but I can't seem to find a decent method to render my 1280x720 video that doesn't look like crap.
I've switched between several video types (mainly avi and mov), but I can't find a suitable method.
I am a total noob to this stuff and though I'd prefer to use a .mov or .avi file (since any PC can pretty much play them), I need some good setting to output a quality video.
All of this stuff about bitrate/pixel type/etc, I just have no idea what I'm doing.
I appreciate any advice.

See: FAQ:What export settings should I use?
You will also find links to many free tutorials in the PremiereProPedia that will quickly show you how things are done in Premiere Pro.
Cheers
Eddie

I sure hope that the new imessenger doesn't look like the text messaging app, that would be a huge flop for apple. It has to look and feel like bbm or it will just suck.

I sure hope that the new imessenger doesn't look like the current text messaging app, that would be a huge flop. I think I should look and feel like the bbm to make any kind of significant impact. Am I wrong?

"iMessage in iOS 5 brings the functionality of iPhone messaging to all of your iOS devices―iPhone, iPad and iPod touch. Built right into the Messages app, iMessage allows you to easily send text messages, photos, videos or contact information to a person or a group on other iOS 5 devices over Wi-Fi or 3G. iMessages are automatically pushed to all your iOS 5 devices, making it easy to maintain one conversation across your iPhone, iPad and iPod touch. iMessage also features delivery and read receipts, typing indication and secure end-to-end encryption."
That is from the Apple site. If all your friends have an iPhone, iPod Touch, or iPad you cang share with your friends, with is exactly like BlackBerry Messenger (BBM only works on BBs).
And it does look just like the current message format. You can also find that at www.Apple.com

I "Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems", but it doesn't look like the view on getting started: ie

I "Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems", but it doesn't look like the view on getting started tutorial, ie: there's no "Firefox tab". I would really like to clean out all the old stuff, including add-ons and plug-ins that I've tinkered in, but don't know about or need any more, then start fresh with the latest Firefox. How can I do that?

The Firefox button does not or did not showupon Windows XP by default.
It is easy to display that just remove the option to display the menu bar toolbar. Note
# The functions and available optons are much the same just organised differenttly
# Menu tool bar may be displayed temporarily; even if the Firefox Button is present: by holding down the keyboard '''Alt''' key
#To remove the menu toolbar use '''View -> Toolbars -> []Menu Toolbar''' see [[Display the Firefox button menu instead of the menu toolbar]]

In app purchase error message "it doesn't look like you've purchased this product with this account"

I have one itunes account and I made an in app purchase to unlock a full game. The charges appear on my account but the game tells me "it doesn't look like you've purchased this product with this account", although it acknowledges that I already paid to unlock a full version. I tried redownloading the game, I tried syncing with itunes. I am not sure where to start next. Any help appreciated. Thanks

Sorry, maybe I didn't express myself well.
I have the same Apple ID in the 3 devices, iPad mini, iPhone 4s and iPhone 5s. In the 2 first the app camera+ is installed, but it is the unique app that doesn't show up in my purchased items in the iPhone 5s. If I want it I have to buy again. I really didn't understand what happened that I can't install it free again.
Thank you.

The downlaod folder doesn't look like other folder

My Download folder doesn't look like other folders, can some one help me with that.
Thanks

1. Select the folder and press Command + i (or go File -> Get Info).
2. In the top left corner of the info window you can see the icon.
3. Select the icon by left-clicking it.
3. Cut, copy or paste the icon.

Doesn't look like charging, screen stays black

My ipod out of charge and now doesn't look like it is charging. The screen is blank when I connect to computer or wall adapter.

To change the locations of your code and design views under Split, go into the View menu and put a check by Split Vertically.
If you are using a version of the program that doesn't match the video (say using DWCS6 with a CC2014 video) it's not going to work well. There have been quite a few changes between recent versions and if your video and DW versions don't match, it's easy to get lost.
Check your version by going to Help > About Dreamweaver.
If you post back with your version, someone here should have links to videos that match it.

I bought an app Camera and it is installed in both IPhone4S and mini IPad, now I have also one IPhone 5s and this app doesn't look like I have purchased it yet.

I bought an app Camera+ and it is installed in both IPhone4S and mini IPad, now I have also one IPhone 5s and this app doesn't look like I have purchased it yet.
If I want to install I have to buy it again. Please, somebody has some advise?
Thank you.

Sorry, maybe I didn't express myself well.
I have the same Apple ID in the 3 devices, iPad mini, iPhone 4s and iPhone 5s. In the 2 first the app camera+ is installed, but it is the unique app that doesn't show up in my purchased items in the iPhone 5s. If I want it I have to buy again. I really didn't understand what happened that I can't install it free again.
Thank you.

Should be straight alpha, but it doesn't look like it

I'm using Keylight on some footage in AE CS4, and then bringing it into PPro CS3 for the rest of the editing process. In AE, one of my roses (a light one chosen to accentuate what is going on) looks like this:
I have "Unpremultiply" checked in Keylight, and here are my Output Module Settings for the render:
As far as I can tell, I should be doing everything right to end up with footage with straight alpha, but in PPro, I get the famous "premultiplied-alpha halo" anyway! At first, the halo was only appearing a second or two after I would click in a new spot on the timeline - that really got my attention that it was something other than just bad keying on my part. I actually tried to catch a screen capture during that moment before the halo would appear (to show the before-and-after), but by the time I decided to try that, Murphy's law had kicked in - now there is no delay and it looks like this all the time:
I have several roses that I have processed in the same manner, and they all have the halo, but it's of course not as obvious if the rose itself and/or the background footage is darker.
I'm pretty new to keying and alpha, but I thought I had done my homework, so to speak. What other settings should I check?

Thanks for the suggestion - it basically worked. PPro CS3 doesn't appear to have an effect called "Alpha Key", so I used "Track Matte Key", specifying the track where I put the alpha clip and selecting Luma Key for the setting (setting it to Alpha Key didn't do anything, and it was clear that the "alpha" AVI was not an alpha channel per se, but just a regular video clip with a B&W representation of the transparency). I also don't see any effect called "Minimax". Anyway, I followed your suggestion as best I could with the tools I have - you must be using a newer version of PPro. I can indeed see about a pixel or so that would be better if it was more transparent - I suspect your Minimax suggestion would have taken care of that. But this is definitely usable.
Key point for those reading this later: You have to choose "Straight" for the Color setting when you render by this method, even though you get some strong warnings that dissauded me the first time I tried it (I thought they were saying I had to include an alpha channel in the stream, not the method I was about to use).
One more question: When rendering the separate alpha clip (essentially just a grayscale video of the transparency) to be used as the luma matte for the Track Matte Key, does it matter whether the Color setting is Straight or Premultiplied? I can't imagine that it would matter for that clip, but if there is a subtle difference, let me know.
I have no idea why I can't get it to work with an embedded alpha channel, though - surely hundreds or thousands of people use these two programs to handle RGB+Alpha video files. For this time, I'll re-render my roses (twice for each rose to get the two streams - this will give my CPU a workout!) and use this workaround, but if someone has any insight about the more direct method, please enlighten us all.

Web Page in Dreamweaver doesn't look like Web Page on Internet.

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~genient/
My Web Page looks like this on my Windows XP computer (but in script:
Membership Fees are due on 1 July each year. The benefits of Membership include the
monthly mail-out of our Magazine Progenitor, keeping you in touch with the latest news on research. Contact us by Email to receive an application form and information sheet, by Telephone 08-8981 7363 or by Fax 08-8981 7383.
My HTML Code looks like this:
Membership</a> Fees are due on 1 July each year. The benefits of Membership include the 
monthly mail-out of our Magazine Progenitor, keeping you in touch with the latest news on research. Contact us by <a href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=membership enquiry">Email</a> to receive an application form and information sheet,
 by Telephone 08-8981 7363 or by Fax 08-8981 7383.
If I open the same site on the Web,
the Web page looks like this, except this copy of View Source did not pick up the BOLDFACE effect on the webpage, which I will now add manually:
Membership Fees are due on 1 July each year. The benefits of Membership include the
monthly mail-out of our Magazine Progenitor, keeping you in touch with the latest news on research. Contact us by Email to receive an application form and information sheet, by Telephone 08-8981 7363 or by Fax 08-8981 7383.
and the HTML Code looks like this in VIEW/SOURCE
and why those boxes/frames have appeared (they are not visible in the VIEW-SOURCE on the web) I don't know.:
Membership of GSNT
 <a href="/~genient/aboutus.htm">Membership</a> Fees are due on 1 July each year. The benefits of Membership include the 
monthly mail-out of our Magazine Progenitor, keeping you in touch with the latest news on research. Contact us by <a href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=membership enquiry">Email</a> to receive an application form and information sheet,
 by Telephone 08-8981 7363 or by Fax 08-8981 7383.
And when I try LIVE VIEW, firstly it said I needed Flash Plugin. I downloaded that. It still says that A Flash Netscape/Firefox Plugin was not found. (Comment: I have used firefox on a computer, and found it very high-handed and intrusive),
Fnally, I tried to match the beginning HTML of a page which DOES look correct on the web, but there is no difference.
http://members.iinet.com.au/~genient/Directory%20of%20Useful%20Internet%20Sites.html
Help, please?
Esther

according to the w3 validator your page has 96 errors! (thats a lot)
on first glance of the code there and many puzzling things I saw
firstly.
<title>Home Page Genealogical Society of the Northern Territory
</title>
not only can you not put font tags on a page title.
its nested wrong.
in any case the font tag is deprecated
secondly
whats with these style declarations?
.aliensheading { color: #008080;}
.aliensheading { color: #008080;}
.aliensheading { font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;}
.aliensheading1 {color: #008080;}
.aliensheading1 {color: #008080;}
.aliensheading1 {font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;}
its just duplication of the same thing
is aliensheading any different to aliensheading1 at all?
and again here
.GREEN1 {color: #008080;}
.GREEN1 {color: #008080;}
.GREEN1 {color: #008080;}
and here
.Green {color: #408080;}
.GreenStrong {color: #408080;}
.GreenStrong {color: #408080;}
your CSS should be declared in a separate file, and if not, at least within the head of the document.
yours is sitting after the </head> but before <body> tag. its no wonder it isnt reading it!
thirdly what is this???



<img src="/~genient/images/GSNT Tree.GIF" width="75" height="55" alt="Tree" />



from what I can see this is the only relevant info
<img src="/~genient/images/GSNT Tree.GIF" width="75" height="55" alt="Tree" />
and all your million declarations of
 (all within a p mind you)
can simply be replaced with
p {
font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size:3; (although I'd prefer px myself)
fourthly you've got a list but it isnt a list because there is no <ul> or <ol> surrounding it.
and lastly
what is this????
</blockquote>
 </blockquote>
 </blockquote>
 </blockquote>
 </blockquote>
 </blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
 <blockquote>
 <blockquote>
 <blockquote>
 <blockquote>
 <blockquote>
 <blockquote>
 <a href="/~genient/emungalan.htm"></a> 
 </blockquote>
 </blockquote>
 </blockquote>
 </blockquote>
 </blockquote>
 </blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
this site needs a serious overhaul. like serious.

I have downloaded updates for Firefox but my browser doesn't look like it should, no single menu button etc, how do I get it to look like your demo?

The last few times I have been prompted to update my firefox for desktop, my browser has not looked any different even though I get notification to say updates completed successfully. When I update firefox gives a demo of new features and how my browser should look, mine has not looked like the demo for the past few updates. It's annoying because I really like the look of having just one menu button. How can I change the look of my browser?

The Firefox button displays by default only in Windows Vista and Windows 7. You '''''can''''' have it display in Windows XP
'''Menu Bar''' 
*right-click empty space at the end of the Tab Bar, click "Menu Bar" to place a checkmark
*Menu Bar checked = Menu Bar on; Firefox button off
*Menu Bar un-checked = Menu Bar off; Firefox button on
*Other methods of doing the same:
**click Firefox button > Options, click Menu Bar
**Quick toggle Menu Bar on/off: ALT+V+T+M
To have the Menu Bar '''''temporarily''''' display when the Firefox button is on, press the ALT key or the F10 key to make the Menu Bar appear and use your mouse to make selections from the temporarily displayed Menu Bar. Why would you want to do this? The selections available are different.
'''If this reply solves your problem, please click "Solved It" next to this reply when signed-in to the forum.'''

Best way to make a logo that doesn't look like crap on big screens/phones?

I am working on creating a simple text logo that fits in a 110x300 pixel space for a website. The thing is, at this small resolution, it looks pretty crappy using Photoshop. So, I tried Illustrator because I believe you can save vectors with it (I'm new to all this). From what I know, vectors don't lose quality when zoomed in (or on big screens). However, I have no clue what I'm doing. I tried to "save for web" a logo as a png 24, and it still looks like crap. Am I doing something wrong, or is it just not possible to save a high quality image at that size?

So, there is no way to save a vector image for a website?
SVG. Flash. HTML5 canvas objects (JavaScript).
That was what SVG was really made for, but it never found widespread use.
That's a pretty broad-based (and misleading) dismissal.
Use of SVG is increasing, not declining, and practically all current browsers now support it. So with such a statement, you would need to quantify "widespread". Of course SVG (like Flash and canvas) is and probably always will be less common than raster formats, but that's always been true of vector-based graphics in general, even in print. Less "widespread" use of something superior is an advantage to those who employ it. Sites which employ it effectively can be more engaging and dynamic than the far more "widespread" ones which don't. That's the whole point.
Fonts are also vector-based graphics and are certainly pretty "widespread" in use on the web. (Consider the potential of this in the light of things like font embedding and GoogleFonts.)
From what I know, vectors don't lose quality when zoomed in (or on big screens).
Stallone, your question is really more a matter of the platforms / browsers you are targeting. You have to be aware of what kind of zooming you are talking about and what is happening on what you're referring to as "big screens."
For example, you can easily launch Inkscape, create an SVG graphic consisting entirely of vector paths, and include it in a static web page. It will be displayed and rasterized on-the-fly by the local machine, as vector graphics are intended to do. But now, who or what is going to "zoom" it? Are you talking about mere screen "magnification" by the sight impaired in which the whole page is zoomed? Are you talking about pinch zooming on mobile devices in which the whole page is zoomed? Are you talking about projecting on the conference room screen in which nothing is actually zoomed (re-rasterized) at all?
Everything that anybody views on a computer monitor is a raster image, because the monitor itself is a raster imaging device. That's even true of vector paths you draw and view in programs like Illustrator. Vector-based graphics get re-rasterized on the fly--so long as the system in which they are being printed/viewed is capable of supporting that. The question boils down to when the rasterization occurs and what is doing the zooming.
Historically, web browsers don't do that. The "intelligence" (programming) involved in rasterizing vector paths on the fly has to be effectively "embedded" in the graphic or in an add-on program (browser plug in) which performs the re-rasterization locally on the viewer's machine. That's why Flash requires a plug-in and SVG has to be viewed in a browser that understands the XML upon which it's based (which most current browsers nowadays do) and HTML5 Canvas has to viewed in browsers which can run its JavaScript-like programming (which is still developing).
All this is constantly changing as mobile devices and platforms and ebooks proliferate, and all this is why designing for the web always entails some amount of experimentation on the platform(s) for which you are developing.
It's a big subject; not something you can get a crash course on in a forum like this.
JET

Getting started tab won't show info..it's all purple and my page doesn't look like the illustrations

When I clicked on the getting started tab, the page illustrated does not look like the page I am currently getting. When I tried to click or roll over the various tabs, all I get is a purple box with no information.
So far, I have found this site very confusing and unhelpful.

It looks like you are using a 4 1/2 year old version - Firefox 2.0.
You can get the latest version of Firefox from here: 
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/

Home doesn't look like A-Master

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for