Homepage changed to list view

I set my home page to MSN and I used to get the "normal" MSN page with graphics, pictures and news print. Firefox changed my MSN home page to a "list" view that shows just links, no pictures (or very few) and no print to read the news. How can I get Firefox to recognize a normal MSN page?

hello deradtke1, please go through the steps covered in [[Websites look wrong or appear differently than they should]] - they contain some common solutions for the issue you've described...

Similar Messages

Calendar change of list view

When did Apple change the list view? It was perfect with the last upgrade and now today I have the month shown and a narrow slot for the list to scroll thru. Stupid....if I wanted the month I would view the month. When I want the list I don't need the month. The list view is worthless now.

Hello Nikita,
Please refer this.
http://scn.sap.com/community/businessobjects-web-intelligence/blog/2014/01/24/dynamic-default-values-with-prompt-in-webi-reports-based-on-bex-queries-in-bo
Regards,
Ritika Garg

Changes to list view in iTunes 8

I've noticed some changes to the list view in iTunes 8, which in my personal opinion, means it doesn't look as good as in previous versions.
For example, in previous versions there was a little gap between albums, there are now all bunched up together, and I feel it just makes the screen look a bit cramped. I'd prefer an option to have it looking like it used to.
There are also changes to the artwork column. The shadow for album artwork has been removed. The font for artist and title has been made bigger, there is also a grey background which I don't remember being there before.
I realise these are only minor points compared to some of the issues some people have been having with iTunes 8, but given how much attention Apple normally pays to having attractive GUIs, I feel these changes are a step back.
Does anyone else feel some of these changes should be reversed, or is just me?

I agree with you that the lack of gaps between albums makes it more difficult to pick each one out in the list, as does the uninterrupted repetition of the alternately coloured row background.
I guess this is a side-effect of making artwork display in list view optional. I too prefer the previous approach.

Album list view change in iPod.

Please advise how to change album list view in iPod to simple?
I mean so no artwork display during navigation, just like in older ipod models.
I use iPod 5g. classic 160 Gb.

kirikuri wrote:
Answer "No" is the most easy.
Hope someone from apple team will this post.
This is a user to user forum. Apple employees don't post here as a general rule.
And tt's answer, while easy, is also correct. You can't change the album view so that there is no artwork.

List view

How do I change to list view, so I can see everything on one line including my comments, like in the old (and far better) iTunes, please
The new design is horrible!

You can't. You can either see just the artwork and songs and year or you can see songs, comments, year, bitrate, etc without the artwork. The paradigm for viewing information is no longer "views" but search type. Which is an asinine mistake from a UI perspective. I want to view my information the way I want and search within that view paramater. To be forced to view the information the way Apple wants depending on search type is counterintuitive and annoying. I downgraded to iTunes 10.7.

List view threshold showing error on Production but not on Dev

I have a library on Production containing 6000 items.
There is a web part which displays items from that library (all on one page) and it is showing error because the items exceeded 5000 limit.
The same web part on Dev is not showing error when I display 6000 records from that list on a single page.
List view threshold is set to 5000 on both Production and Dev.
Why both servers are showing different behaviors? Is there some other setting other than List view threshold different on Production than Dev?
Where do I look?

Hi Frank,
The number of items in a folder needs to be less or equal to the list view threshold.
If a list/library has 4000 items and a folder with 3000 items, both the folder view and the root folder view will
work for a list view threshold of 5000. However, if the folder or root folder grows to have more than 5000 items,
it will stop displaying items in the default view.
The easiest and quickest solution is to change the list view threshold for the period you migrate the site, then change it back to default. To do this follow the steps:
go to your SP2013 Farm's Central Administration
go to the "Manage Web Applications" under the "Application
Management" section
select the "Web Application" where you migrate the site
click the "General Settings" dropdown and select "Resources
Throttling"
change the "List View Threshold" to 12000 if your library has 11000 pages
migrate your site from SP2010 to SP2013
change the "List View Threshold" back to 5000.
SharePoint 2013 works the same as 2010 in terms of list view threshold: you can use folders and/orviews filtered on indexed columns to
access items in a list/library with more than 5000 of items.
When you try to add/delete an entire list/library that has more than 5000 items, then the operation fails. The solutions here are:
see what I've said at point 2. above
enable the "Daily Time Window for Large Queries" option located in the same place as the "List View Threshold".
This enables you to get around the "List View Threshold" during the time window you set, which could be sometime at 23:00 when nobody accesses SharePoint, for example. You can migrate your site during that time window.
Indul Hassan
Microsoft Community Contributor
http://www.indulhassan.com
You Snooze.. You Lose !!

Finder files always in reverse alphabetical order in List View

Hi all,
Ever since I upgraded to Mountain Lion from Snow Leopard, I've experienced an intermittent quirk with Finder. I generally keep most files in folders by alphabetical order. But in my Applications folder, Finder is stuck on keeping them in reverse alphabetical order, which is annoying. I've never had this issue in previous releases of OS X becuase there was always the small triangle to invert order, but this triangle doesn't appear in my Applications folder. Only my Applications folder has a weird white bar with Name, Size, etc, as opposed to the gray one that appears in every other folder in the OS.
I have tried to remedy this via the following:
Changing from List View to other views--this puts them in normal alpha order, but I like apps in List View so I can see many of them at a glance
Sorting by other categories (file size, etc.) and then switching back
Clicking on the name bar with every possible combination of buttons (Fn + click, Ctrl + click, etc.)
All to no avail. Is anyone else experiencing this problem? It only happens with the Applications folder, and only in List View.
Thanks!

I also have this problem, and the work around works for me, but...
This has got to be a bug, right? There is nothing, anywhere that I can see, that controls whether it is alpha ascending or alpha descending. The "fix", such as it is, is to ignore the Arrange By menu and use the column headers to select the sort order.
In fact, to bulletproof it (because I will forget eventually) the best solution would be to remove the "arrange" menu altogether because it does not do anything that sorting by column headers does not do. In fact, it does less. In even more fact, it does worse than less.
Apple is keenly persuing minimalism. So why does the arrange menu exist? And if it does exist, why did no-one test that it works rationally?
The corollary of all this is that the Arrange By menu does the same thing as clicking the menu headers, but when you use it, it disables them.
I have been banging my head on my desk since I bought my new machine with Mt Lion on it about the wretched headers not setting the sort order and it is because some - numbskull is not the _only_ word that comes to mind - has decided one selection mechanism for the sort function should disable the other. ¿Eh?

List view web part not reflecting changes made to list view in SharePoint Designer

Dear All,
When adding a list view web part containing a view modified in SharePoint designer (e.g. conditional formatting applied, or group headers modified) I'm finding that the changes made in SPD are not reflected in the web part.
For example, I go into SPD edit a view, and the view appears correctly when I go back into SharePoint, however when I link to the view within a list view web part it results in losing the changes made in SPD.
Becasue it's a publishing page I'm unable to edit the contents of the web part in SPD.
I'm sure this is expected behavior but how do I get around this?
Thnaks,
MDB

Try below
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19533998/sharepoint-designer-doesnt-show-anything-in-list-and-libraries-link
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/a63a1894-6b1d-420a-95dd-b6c546eab34d/updates-made-to-sharepoint-designer-2010-workflow-do-not-show-up-on-the-server?forum=sharepointcustomizationprevious
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5959521/sharepoint-designer-saves-the-changes-but-it-does-not-affect
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/1e9a8c27-bbc5-4a6f-8daf-4b243182f543/changes-in-sharepoint-designer-2010-not-showing-in-sharepoint-server-2010-page?forum=sharepointadminprevious

How do you change the sort order of a Stack on the Dock in List view?

I want to change the 'Date Added' sort in the list view mode of a stack from descending to ascending.
I have the Downloads stack sorted by 'Date Added', however I would like to reverse the order of this sorting. When I open the stack, it shows the oldest files at the bottom and newest files at the top. Since there are many hundreds of files, the newest files are actually hidden and I must scroll up to access them. When I access this folder I want to see the most recent files first, at the bottom of the list nearest the stack icon, not the files I downloaded years ago.
I prefer to use the traditional List view for Stacks because it is faster (no animations or loading preview icons) and easier to navigate visually. Please do not suggest a different view mode such as fan view or use-new-list-stack.

Have you tried changing the list with the numbers? (See the screen shot)

Changing all folders to List view in Finder: How to?

I'm trying to accomplish what I assumed would be a simple task...
I want the view of every folder, when opened in the Finder, to be List view. All new folders... all the existing folders... everything.
I want it to forget all about any current settings or other defaults, and force everything into List view.
Is this possible? I'm perfectly willing to dive into the Terminal to delete .DS_Store files or perform whatever brutality needs to occur.
Thanks!
Mac Mini Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Derek,
Ah, I think I see your problem now. Actually, you are dreaming of the one thing that is, in fact, difficult. You see, every new folder is created (and will always be created, no matter what we do) with Icon View set as the default. This can be overidden by selecting "Always open in Column View," which doesn't necessarily force every window to open that way, but goes a long way towards achieving that end (over time, it works).
Forcing every window into list view is a little more difficult. It is simple enough to make all of your own folders show this view, as only a single "tease" should be necessary for a folder that you own (you can just get in the habit of making this change each time a new folder is created, which normally isn't that often for most of us). Any changes we make to our own folders should "stick" as a matter of course.
The problem is getting all of the root-owned folders to which we navigate frequently to do the same. You probably went a long way toward achieving that end by simply deleting all of the .DS_Store files. The .DS_Store file for a particular folder will be owned by the first user to navigate that folder in the Finder. If that user is you, you will own the file, not root. So, having deleted those files, you gave yourself the opportunity to "assume control" of those directories. Keep in mind that if the folder is owned by root, with a group ownership of "admin," you must be an admin user to be able to write a .DS_Store file to that directory. I assume that you are using an admin account(??).
At this point, I would suggest that you just start navigating your file system and changing directories. If you did not do so as root after having deleted the .DS_Store files, you should be able to make the necessary changes as yourself. Provided you have assumed control of the .DS_Store files, you should only have to make changes once.
Of course, you will still have to click that little button one time for each new folder you create. Apple has gone a long way toward making the interface as flexible as possible (nobody else does it as well, mind you), but as they say, "you can't make everybody happy all of the time." It is an ideal only to be strived for, never to be reached.
Scott

List View : Opening folder in folder changes modified date in list view

Since my office upgraded me to 10.5.4, when I flip open a folder in List View, then flip open a sub-folder, the modified date in the original folder changes to now. Opening subsequent folders again changes the modified date of the folder above it. I do not remember this happening in Tiger, and since part of my job involves finding and archiving old files, this is driving me crazy. Can I stop it?
Jeff Work

That's interesting, and probably why the original poster had the same issue, but it does not work that way for me with Leopard 10.5.5.
In list view, the .DS_Store does not get updated when I flip down the folder. The .DS_Store file only gets updated if I open the folder in icon view. That makes sense because the .DS_Store file stores the relative position of the icons in the window.
However, when I go back to list view, even though the .DS_Store file is updated to the current data and time, the Date Modified of the parent folder does not change.
This different may be caused by some setting you are using in Finder that most people do not use, or maybe because of some other Mac OS X feature such as File Vault (which I do not use), or maybe some third party software that modifies Finder functionality. I don't know...

XSLT List View Web part with Inline Editing changing value for one field changes the other lookup field

Hi
It's a bit of a weird one. In an XSLT List View web part when Inline editing is enabled if I change the date column, it changes the lookup field column as well. This behavior only occurs if the lookup list has more than 20 entries. Below 20 and we are
OK.
Let me explain by example:
MileStones List - Having more than 20 items
Tasks List - having a lookup to the Title field from MileStones list. Also having a due date field.
Simple web part page with one XSLT List View web part for Tasks having inline editing enabled.
When I edit the first record's due date and press enter (which saves the changes and moves onto next record) and change the due date on second record without even touching the MileStone field. Press enter to commit changes and you see the milestone changing
on first record!
The wierd thing is that if the MileStone list has less than 20 items all works as expected.
Any pointers will be appreciated
Thanks

Hi,
This is a known limitation when working with complex fields like Lookup field.
A workaround is that we can avoid using the inline edit feature when there are
complex fields in a list.
You can take a look at this KB from Microsoft Support to get more details:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2600186/en-us
A similar thread for your reference:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/3d369611-ee79-4b5c-86bb-c0f3878cd746/standard-list-view-with-inline-editing-lookup-column-copies-preceding-or-following-items-related?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
Thanks
Patrick Liang
TechNet Community Support

SharePoint2010 XSLT list view web part change link to edit field

As Highlighted in image there is XSLT list view webpart and I want to change the edit field link to EditFormAdmin.ASPX form against particular Item ID.
Please suggest me how to implement it.
Thanks and Regards, Digambar Kashid

You can always change the editform.aspx for whole list using below:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/sharepoint-designer-help/create-a-custom-list-form-HA010119111.aspx
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/sharepoint-designer-help/create-a-custom-list-form-using-sharepoint-designer-HA010378258.aspx
You cannot change it for a particular item in list
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Using "View Selector" in the List View Web Part, changes the web part page to the view selected's page.

Hi,
I am relatively new to Web Parts pages. I created a page with list view web part and a Infopath Form Web Part, which are connect via the "Get Form From" option. My users would like to be able to use views dependent on what
they are looking for. So I created different views. However, when I select the view from within the Web Part, it changes the web part page to the list view page. I must be doing something wrong. How do I configure the list view to show
the selected view and results within the existing "list view web part"?
Thanks,
Dwayne

Hi
Lindali,
Sorry, but this has not been answered to my liking. The "List View Web Part" has the ability for the user to select the view from within the web part, so there you should be able to select a different view and have it appear within the same web part.
Does anyone know how to complete this task?
Thanks,
Dwayen

Sort order switches when changing from List to Thumbnail View

I can't seem to get the Thumbnail view to "lock" to the same sort order as the list view. I arrange by file name (or ingest date, or reverse media duration, or any of the other sortable metadata fields) in list view, but then when I click to the thumbnail view, the order seems to arbitrariliy change to some sort of preset. What's worse, it appears to be changing to something that's in a jumbled order.
This isn't a big deal if I only have 10 clips. If I have 100, or 1,000 clips though, they have to be in a sortable order for the thumbnail view to be of any use.
Thanks,
Eli

Hi,
Thanks for your post. Our current design doesn't support keeping order between list view and icon view. It would be good if you can drop that as a feature request / bug into the the forum.

Homepage changed to list view

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for