How did they create this effect?

Hi everyone!
I'm trying to duplicate the effect on layer 2 so I can apply it to different text layers. (please see attached file below) Instead of "You", I want to write "Get". When I change the text to "Get" I want to make sure layer 2 changes to "Get" as well. I'm lost because I don't know how to do it.
Thanks very much for your time and any ideas and suggestions.
-TD

When one wants two layers to show the same content Smart Objects are the tool of choice.
In attached file I created a SO of the text-layer, duplicated it and applied a different Layerstyle to that.
To change the text one can open the SO (by double-clicking its symbol in the Layers Panel), make the changes and save it.

Similar Messages

How did they do this effect?

How did they get this effect of the dots on her face....?
Thanks in advance...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkVy2FeqIyc&feature=related

Cool video. I'd say that everything is done in After Effects, including the 'dots' on her face.
It's a simple effect filter you can apply.

How did they do this effect in photoshop?

I love this effect, but cannot figure out how they made these darker brown lines around their tables (kind of a whisked broken up lines) around their tables. I have tried every brush tool and effect I could think of, but know need to ask the experts! Thank you very much in advance. Buffmin
here is the link.....

Looks to me like the table borders are separate partially transparent GIF files.
Check this file, for example: http://roccospizzaandsubs.com/assets/images/Appetizers_Back.gif
Just a guess, but they may have made an image with texture, then painted on a mask to make it transparent. The trick is positioning it in the HTML so that it overlays the background and properly aligns with the text.
-Noel

How did they create this component.. suggestions please

Hello,
Please spend 3 minutes to watch this video and reply..Thanks a lot!!
http://www.youtube.com/user/PracticeFusion#p/u/13/S1gQDHsmUqo
here i've seen a flex calendar (go to 1.49 minute) they have a weekly view of the calendar. I would like to know how they did this. Please it is urgent.!!

saisri2k2,
Our component is designed to be extensible. To make it look like it does in the video, you'd have tocreate a custom dayRenderer to displays and styles your data elements.
You can check our documentation for information on the APIs and how to modify, or replace, our default look::
http://www.flextras.com/Calendar/docs/FlextrasCalendarDocumentation.pdf
It's not trivial, but it shouldn't be hard either. We'd be more than willing to work with you as a customer to make it work.
Feel free to contact us directly if you wanted to discuss further ( http://www.flextras.com/?event=ContactForm )

Cool effect..how can i create this effect on Motion 3?

that's great.
Someone please tell me how can i create this effect on motion 3?
http://www.ayatoweb.com/aetips_e/ae17_mov05e.html
thanks

Use the bezier tool to create your shapes, give the shapes an Airbrush outline. Then apply a Write On behavior to each shape. Position the shapes in the timeline so they appear sequentially. To achieve the zooming out effect, you can either scale the whole group, or convert the group to 3D and use the camera to zoom out.

How did they acheive this?

Hi folks. I'm just designing for Flex, so I dont know any code or anything like that. I'm doing a Photoshop mockup of a Flex design. I'm new to Flex, so this might be a noob question.
In the flex style explorer I noticed some nice looking curved highlights at the top of the containers.
How did they do this?

Could I put an FXG inside an application controlbar as well?
Yes, if it's a Spark application. Components have skins. Spark component skins can contain fxg graphics. The programmer will have to create a new skin for the application component.
You should check out Flash Catalyst. It's a tool for creating Flex application designs without writing code.
You create the design and send the Catalyst project to the programmer
The programmer imports the poroject and writes the code

Rounded corners in Ubuntu - how did they do this?

In the latest Ubuntu 6.10 there are all corners rounded.
Screenshot
How did they do this? Is this some kind of hack for GTK+?

iphitus wrote:
doesnt need to be a change of GTK theme/engine.
metacity can grab colours from GTK. take a look at the edges of the menu bar and all that spacing, metacity is using a wide border to allow it to be rounded, and grabbing the GTK theme's colour to appear seamless.
Aha! Thanks James!

HOW CAN I CREATE THIS EFFECT????

Does anyone know how create this awesome effect??
http://www.redpearlkitchen.com/losangeles/index.html
email me please
[email protected]

you can just have everything in an entire H box or V box with
a "move left" and "move right" function, that moves the X
coordinates once the button is clicked.. should be as easy as that.
to make it smooth like that you'd need a few extra components but
shouldn't be that hard.

How would you create this effect?

I am curious if there is a fairly straight-foward away of creating the effect seen in this image. I am talking about the pixelated effect made up of many little red boxes of various hues at the top part of the image.
I was thinking of zooming in real close to an image in photoshop and doing a screen capture, but I'd rather have a vector image that can be easily scaled in size and easy to change the hue to different colors.
Something like this able to be done in illustrator without building it a box at a time?
Regards,

Well I'd say that PDF is a vector.
The PDF contains nothing other than a raster image. It contains no vector paths.
(By the way: "A vector" is a single expression of a direction. Calling a vector-based illustration "a vector" is like calling a raster-based image "a pixel.")
I zoomed in as close as I could and didn't see any pixels.
All you could see is pixels. That's all that's there.
If it's raster I'd be interested in knowing what resolution...
Its resolution is 1. It's a single-pixel raster image (as given away in its title).
I've never experienced a raster image that didn't get more pixelated the larger you scaled it up.
Yes, you have. That's exactly what I demonstrated in post 5 and in the PDF.
The operative word in your comment is more pixelated. That misconception is the point of the demonstration. Your image is already pixelated, and that's exactly what you want. It won't be "more" pixelated whatsoever, no matter how large you scale it.
At the heart of the [quite common] misconception is this: What you are calling "resolution" is not. True resolution is the measure of the amount of information contained. A raster image contains only a fixed amount of information. PPI is merely a scale factor. It's merely an expression of information density, not quantity. As you can see, that PDF is every bit as "resolution independent" (i.e.; scaleable) as a vector square.
The same priciple applies to your raster image. Your whole intent in your posted example is to display pixelation. So if the very thing you're trying to depict is the pixelation of, say, a 10 pixel x 20 pixel raster image, then all you need in order to depict that at any scale is a 10 pixel by 20 pixel raster image. At a scale of 10 PPI, you've got a perfect depiction of 10 square Pixels Per Inch. At a scale of 200%, you've got a perfect depiction of 5 square Pixels Per Inch (i.e.; 10 Pixels Per 2 Inches). You can scale it to the size of the moon and you'll have a perfect depiction of 10 Pixels Per Moon. It's just as scaleable as a 10 x 20 array of vector squares.
In other words: All the actual resolution of your raster image (all its information—all its pixels, in all their squareness) is already visible. Reducing its information density (by scaling it larger) will not reveal more of its actual information (the square shape of its pixels—the information that one usually wants to conceal or disguize about raster images, but not in this case).
The whole purpose of making sure your raster images have "sufficient resolution" in desktop publishing is to disguise the squareness of their pixels (what is commonly called "pixelation"). But that is exactly what you are intending to depict in this case. And you want to be able to depict that with equal clarity at any scale. There's no need to re-draw it as vector paths in order to do that. In this situation, you are not trying to avoid "pixelation," you are trying to show it, which is exactly what a raster image does by its nature.
Think of it this way: If all you are trying to draw is 200 squares, it can easily be argued that a raster image is more "data efficient" than a file containing 200 square vector paths. For each vector path, you have to include four coordinate pairs (800 anchor points). For a raster image, all you need is 200 color values.
This is not just a symantic or academic or pompous know-it-all point of argument. It's a point widely applicable to many common situations, and something every graphics professional should understand. For example, consider the software instructions author who pointlessly frets over the misunderstood "requirement" for pixel density when his illustrations necessarily consist of screenshots that are, after all, supposed to accurately and clearly depict what the user sees on his screen. Or the fact that you see single-pixel raster images scaled to the full width of the page, or dimensions of a table cell or large section of a whole background on web pages everyday. Or the widespread misconception that intentionally fuzzy raster effects like soft drop shapows "require" 300 PPI.
JET

How do I create this effect?

Hi, I have been searching on tutorials to produce the attached effect, but the problem is, I don't know how to describe it and have very little experience printing on fabric. I'll be submitting a vector image to a production company for printing on silk, and would like to create an effect similar to the soft-edged coloration in the ice tea and umbrellas. I tried feathering but there dosen't seem to be an option to feather one side of things. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance - Julia
Bonus question: Does the linetype look basic, with the fabric altering the edges or does it look like a custom line type?

What you show looks like a simple pattern of 3 pictures.
I’m pretty sure that the fuzzines is either due to poor printing or poor photography or both.

How do I create this effects?

Hi,
I am new here and new to graphics design. I am wondering if anyone knows how I can create the rectangle area which appears to be lighter color than the boarder color but the bottom layer still see through on the boarder. As well as the seems to be some sort of noise effect on all the boarders pus the bottom layer...
http://jch02140.x10hosting.com/images/murmurtwinsbanner.jpg

I would love to be able to help you but I am not quite sure what your asking. But I think what you might try is a gradient from solid color to a 0% opacity. You can create another layer and add noise to the pic if you are trying to recreate the noise in the picture.

How do I create this effect? HALP!

I am currently making a movie that in one instance requires a 'home video effect' aside from filters, etc. I would like to add a "REC ()" symbol near the bottom of the frame, how would I add this to a clip?

The easiest way would be to add a title in one of the corners - make the text red and set it to the duration of the video.

How do I create this effect in photoshop?

http://www.debutart.com/illustration/ben-jennings/20225#/illustration-portfolio
Not just this effect but pretty much the same effect he has running through his whole portfolio.
Im assuming he uses textures and clipping masks? not too familiar with the process at all as im a beginner..
Thanks in advance guys

Good Google search criteria would be
Photoshop Cartoon Speed Art

How would I create this effect in PhotoShop?

I essentially want to create the effect of the person in the window with the rain, but I can't seem to get it right, any tips? Many thanks in advance!

I only have an image of the person who will be in the picture and the following image of rain on a window.

How did they do this? I want to do it too.

My question is about load times.
I want to do an artist's website that would work similar to
http://www.gagosian.com/exhibitions/2009-03-14_richard-phillips/#/images/9/
Their big image on the right starts off at 806K but when you check the load time of it on UIT it shows less than 30K with a really fast load time.
When I optimize my test image I can get it down to about 125K- real slow and doesn't look great.
So then I thought I could link it to Photobucket - loads just as slow.
Here's my test page - still has Photobucket link
http://www.allencsmith.com/untitled10.html
How are they getting the photo to load so fast? How would I optimize my photo to behave as nicely as theirs. Thanks.
DLJ

How did they create this effect?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for