How do I inject a static default route into vrf

Could anybody give me any advise on injecting a static default route into vrf.
The static route is to the internet, I can't enable vrf forwading on the fa interface as other users also use this internet connection.
I am configuring a 7206 VXR 12.3(26) and have attached a copy of the config
Any help gratefully received

Hi
I think you have to specify the route as this
ip route vrf delegate_wireless fa0/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 194.154.168.1 global
it tells the router to to use a next hop that is not part of the vrf.
Also, don't forget that the return traffic has to be routed out to the vrf.
Something like this.
ip route a.b.c.d tu1 10.252.254.2
/Mikael

Similar Messages

UNABLE TO INJECT A STATIC DEFAULT ROUTE FROM PE????

UNABLE TO INJECT A STATIC DEFAULT ROUTE FROM PE????
Description:
I am unable to get a static default route via MPBGP session for a vrf, any other route redistributed the same way is getting through.
Just the static default route isn't ????
1>
SOURCE PE WHERE IS THE ROUTE REDISTRIBUTED:
pe1#
router bgp 4755
bgp router-id 10.10.10.103
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 10.10.10.100 remote-as 4755
neighbor 10.10.10.100 update-source Loopback0
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 10.10.10.100 activate
neighbor 10.10.10.100 send-community extended
exit-address-family
address-family ipv4 vrf B
redistribute static <<<<<<<<<<<<<< STATIC REDIS
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
address-family ipv4 vrf A
redistribute static <<<<<<<<<<<<<< STATIC REDIS
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
ip classless
ip route vrf A 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial1/0 192.168.1.2 global <<<< STATIC ROUTE POINTING THE GLOBAL CONTEXT INTERFACE
ip route vrf B 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial1/0 192.168.1.2 global <<<< STATIC ROUTE POINTING THE GLOBAL CONTEXT INTERFACE
DESTINATION PE HERE I CANNOT SEE THE STATIC DEFAULT ROUTE:
pe3(config-router-af)#do sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
BGP table version is 11, local router ID is 10.10.10.103
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 4755:1 (default for vrf A)
*>i172.16.1.0/30 10.10.10.101 0 100 0 ?
*>i172.16.2.0/30 10.10.10.102 0 100 0 ?
*>i172.16.10.0/24 10.10.10.101 2297856 100 0 ?
*>i172.16.20.0/24 10.10.10.102 2297856 100 0 ?
*>i172.16.200.0/24 10.10.10.102 2170112 100 0 ?
Route Distinguisher: 4755:2 (default for vrf B)
*>i172.16.1.0/30 10.10.10.101 0 100 0 ?
*>i172.16.2.0/30 10.10.10.102 0 100 0 ?
*>i172.16.10.0/24 10.10.10.101 2297856 100 0 ?
*>i172.16.20.0/24 10.10.10.102 2297856 100 0 ?
*>i172.16.200.0/24 10.10.10.102 2170112 100 0 ?
THE STAITC ROUTE IS REDISTRIBUTED TO LOCAL VRF CONTXT ASWELL AS WE CAN SEE:
pe3(config-router-af)#do sh ip route vrf A
Routing Table: A
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is 192.168.1.2 to network 0.0.0.0
172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 2 masks
B 172.16.200.0/24 [200/2170112] via 10.10.10.102, 00:00:23
B 172.16.20.0/24 [200/2297856] via 10.10.10.102, 00:00:23
B 172.16.10.0/24 [200/2297856] via 10.10.10.101, 00:00:23
B 172.16.1.0/30 [200/0] via 10.10.10.101, 00:00:23
B 172.16.2.0/30 [200/0] via 10.10.10.102, 00:00:23
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.1.2, Serial1/0
Hope I am clear in explaining the issue...
Thanks,
Dara

Hehehe :)
"Unfortunately" that's true !!!!
This could have been the last thing that I try.
Getting he techs work, protocols work is fine.
But if get to make myself understand the logic behind adding this command as well than ... :(
Thanks a lot,

Metrics when redistributing a static default route into EIGRP?

I saw a network working with EIGRP and resdistributing a static default route into it. I did not find the "default metrics" to redistribute into EIGRP but the static default route works and is redistributed. My understanding was that everytime you redistribute into EIGRP you needed to specify the metrics. How come this network is working? Can someone explain or point to a cisco document what explains it?
Sample of the config:
router eigrp 1
redistribute static
no autosummary
network Y.Y.Y.Y
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.X.X.X
Thank you,

It's just one of those specific things about EIGRP and IOS, maybe a design choice. If they do use the interface as the seed metric then that would help explain why it's that way.
Weirdly if you are using EIGRP VRF address family configuration on IOS and you redistribute statics you do need a metric.
And I believe NXOS running on Nexus switches also needs a metric defined.
Just one of those things you have to remember but it would be good if it was consistent.
Jon

Injecting Global default Routes into a MPLS VPN

Hi,
I have a PE router running MPBGP which receives two default routes to the internet through an IPV4 BGP session. I need to import these routes in to a VRF and export them to different customer VRFs so that these VRFs are able to access Internet.
I have used the feature called "BGP Support for IP Prefix Import from Global Table into a VRF Table" (URL:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_guide09186a00803b8db9.html#wp1063870)
and imported these routes into a VRF.
The issue is these routes are not propagated to any of the other PE routers which has customer VRFs configured.
Has anybody tried this or a similar method to inject a dynamic default route into a MPLS VPN.
Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Subhash

Hi Subhash,
is there anything preventing you from terminating your internet BGP sessions in a VRF? Then everything should go smoothly, i.e. standard VRF import/export.
So possibility A) create a VRF Internet, move bgp neighbor commands there and use filters preventing anything but the default route, then use route targets to distribute the default route into other VRFs.
Possibility B) use static routing with packet leaking. Could look like this:
ip route vrf Internet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 global
ip route vrf Internet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 global 250
ip route Serial0/0 !assuming this is where the customer router connects.
Note: the BGP peer IP does not have to be directly connected! There has to be a LDP label for it though. so include your BGP peers network into your IGP and the backup will work, when you loose the link to the peer.
Hope this helps! Please rate all posts.
Regards, Martin

Inject BGP Default Routes into Multiple VRF before Best Path Selection

Hello,
I have the following setup:
Multiple Border Routers with eBGP sessions to external AS. We receive a default route from this multiple AS to keep the Table manageable. We noticed an important part of our traffic was been SW routed instead of CEF when we had the Full Internet table. Router Resources came to the ground when we changed to a default.
Now I want to separate this default routes into different VRF. Attached is the Diagram.
My question is, the multiple default route all go into the BGP Table. The BGP table then select the best route and place it on the RIB and then to the FIB.
I want to redistribute the different Route on the BGP table prior to the Best path selection algorithm and placed on the RIB.
How can I achieve this?

Hi,
Redistribution of multiple routes to same prefix is not possible. Even if you have configured BGP multipath and all different bgp routes got installed into routing table, during redistribution only route will be redistributed.
Also would like to understand the requirement of redistributing multiple BGP routes in to IGP. As per your diagram, 3 different eBGP sessions are on three different routers, so you can prefer eBGP route over iBGP received from other routers and can distribute eBGP route to IGP from each router. Thus you will have three different default routes in to IGP in core.
Please don't forget to rate this post if it has been helpful
- Akash

WRV200 Unable to set static default route

In my case i should use the wrv200 as a router with static routes.
A tried to set up a route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254.
I did not get any error messages after clicking the "save changes" button, but it does not work and it can't be seen on the routing table.
I think that it is not a missing feature! That must be a bug!
Could anybody help me please?

I can not do that because the default gateway parameter belongs to the wan interface, which is connected with the router at the vineyard over vpn and has the ip 172.16.1.1 if I try to set here 192.168.1.254 it says:
"The gateway should be in the same subnet as the interface" or something like that with the same meaning.
I did not post but i use the firmware version 1.0.39

Using ACE RHI to inject a default route

I think I posted this onto the wrong Forum. Anyone able to advise here?
SteveK.
Posted by: stevek1 - Network Administrator, Dept Natural Resources and Mines
Apr 18, 2008, 12:04am PST
Hi Folks,
I need to provide internal devices with active-active access to our clustered firewall which sits across 2 data centres.
I need to allow internal hosts to reach external/unknown networks via a default route.
We have ACE modules in our internal network aggregation 6513s at each site.
I aim to achieve this using RHI...ie...device at site 1 reaches the internet via firewall at site 1, device at site 2 reaches internet via firewall at site 2 (due to better route). If the firewall is inaccessible from site 2, ACE at site 2 removes the route from the MSFC using RHI and site 2 device traffic is re-routed to the site 1 exit point.
Has anyone out there done this before?
Regards, Steve.
| Outline | Subscribe | E-Mail this Message
Replied by: stevek1 - Network Administrator, Dept Natural Resources and Mines - Apr 20, 2008, 6:48pm PST
Hi Folks,
It's Steve here again. I haven't had a response to my query as yet, but basically I need to know the validity of using ACE RHI to inject a default route as opposed to a host route.
Can anyone please advise?
Best Wishes, Steve.

Thanks so much for your response Zahoor.
The solution you have provided is more complicated than I had in mind. For example we had not intended using FWSM (we don't have these modules). I just want to use our existing ACEs at each Data Centre to provide the injection of a default route to our internal EIGRP process based on the result of a probe to our Checkpoint FW. What do you think?
Steve.

Modify the preference value of the default route

Hi
How to achieve the Below ? any configuration example?
1)How to modify the preference value of the default route to be less prefered than OSPF External route
2)how to redistribute the default route as type 2 external route
3)how to redistribute the default route as type 1 external route
thanks

Hi Ibrahim,
See below:
1) Can you elaborate on this a bit? Can you explain, specifically, what your trying to accomplish? I don't think you can get a default route into the OSPF RIB that is not external as the default is injected as a Type-5 LSA (e1 or e2). If your talking about getting a router to use the OSPF learned default over the default router learned via some other source (e.g. static, BGP, etc), then it depends on the source because of the Administrative Distance when comparing the two defaults ( the one default learned via OSPF has AD=110, and the other default is AD=X, where X is the Administrative Distance assigned to the protocol).
2) Use the "default-information originate metric-type 2" command under "router ospf" -- Note this is the default
3) Use the "default-information originate metric-type 1" command under "router ospf" -- Note, you don't need this in Totally Stubby Area.
4) For NSSA area you have to use the "area nssa <area_num> default information-originate metric-type <type>" router subcommand. Note your NSSA should have a Type-7 LSA for the default route
Rate if helpful.
Joe

Show ip route, Why 46.1.1.4 is chosen as default route ?

Dear All,
Can you give some idea about this: when entering command "show ip route" the output is as the following. Why 46.1.1.4 is chosen as default route instead of 36.1.1.3 ? Thank you
R6#sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is 46.1.1.4 to network 0.0.0.0
36.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 36.1.1.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
67.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 67.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0/2
78.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S 78.1.1.0 [1/0] via 67.1.1.7
46.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 46.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 46.1.1.4
[1/0] via 36.1.1.3
R6(config)#do sh run | s route
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 36.1.1.3
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 46.1.1.4
ip route 78.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 67.1.1.7

Hello, the static default route is showing to two next hops, 46.1.1.4 and 36.1.1.3. They have the same Admin Distance and cost, if CEF is enabled it will load-share per session (src-dst IP pair)
If the router was only using one of the routes, only one would be displayed.

Basic Default Route Question

Hi,
I have a very basic question I wanted to run by everyone to make sure my understanding is correct.
Setup:
Basic config, router with two interfaces and a single default route.
hostname RTR1
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/1
ip address 1.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.2.2
add -> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.1
If I add a default route (currently in a telnet session coming through 1.1.2.2 to get to RTR1) to a gateway that is NOT locally connected nothing will happen, correct? The router won't try to load balance my traffic since the second gateway is not directly connected and reachable, correct?
Next, if I change the IP address on e0/1 to 10.10.10.2/24 then my default route of 1.1.2.2 will no longer be used and my 10.10.10.1 defaut route will become active, correct?
I can then connect using my new IP of 10.10.10.2 assuming all routing is working on my new default gateway, correct?
Basically, I'm making sure my understanding of the default gateway route not being used unless it is accessible is valid. If it is, it will load balance traffic across up to 6 of them.
Please comment or correct if my understanding is incorrect.
Thanks.

Jamie
I believe that most of your understanding is ok especially about not load sharing over the routes as defined. I checked it on a router and only the default route with a reachable next hop is inserted into the routing table. Both static default routes are in the config but only one is in the routing table.
HTH
Rick

How to forward the traffic of my router??

Good evening
I have a problem, I hope someone can help me.
I have to forward the traffic of my Cisco Router 877W (ip:10.10.10.1) into a hardware firewall (ip: 10.10.10.50) and I can't do it.
Could you give me some advice??
Thanks for your attention.

Hi Marco,
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.50
!-- Static default route pointing to the Firewall.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/36.html
Regards,
~JG
Please rate helpful posts

How to set the default route on a RVS4000 to point to a gateway in the LAN

Hi
The dialog in the RVS4000 for static routes does not allow to set the default route to point to a gateway in the LAN. Clearly this is either a bug or a feature of the web-interface and not a restriction of the box, which runs some kind of linux. So my question is there a way around this problem rather then defining routes to n-class A networks to cover the internet? Like a terminal access to set the default route?
Thanks and cheers
Frank

Hi David
Thanks for your reply. I did already the first part and it seems that I presumed wrongly that the RVS4000 can be used as a layer 3 switch, instead it is only a 1-port gateway. Not that there is a technical limitation from the hardware or the OS of the box. It does layer 3 routing e.g. for its VLAN's. The only point to stop it from having the capability which I expect from something called router is to set its default route to the right gateway independant which port might be connected. The reason why I want a LAN port pointing to the gateway and do not use the WAN port without firewall is of course the VLAN capability of the LAN ports. The idea of the RVS is to bundle two nets, including the one where the gateway is on, and send it to a WAP4410N box, which nicely makes them wireless with different SSID's. Actually I have two ports connetced to the core network, if I am forced to have only the WAN port connected to the core, due to this artificial limitation, I would have to reconfigure a bit. Therefore I try to find an easier solution setting the route by "hand".
Cheers Frank

How can I get a static checkbox to default to ticked?

I have a checkbox on a form that I want to default to TICKED. I then need to check the value of the checkbox before deciding upon whether or not to do some processing (not if the checkbox is UNTICKED).
I have tried with the following values:
Default Value Type: Static Text with Session State Substitutions
Named LOV: - Select Named LOV -
Display Null: No
List of values definition: STATIC :;Y
My checkbox is always defaulting to UNTICKED. How can I get it to default to TICKED?
This is only my second week with APEX, so excuse me if I'm missing the obvious.
Thanks
Alistair

Is this what your looking for?
Try adding "CHECKED" to "HTML Form Element Attributes" in the element section of your item.

Can anyone check this for me, nat overload, static and default routes, dhcp

VA has DHCP on fa0/0 and will have last good address for the gateway and will reserve 20 IP's for admin devices.
VA fa0/1 will be using static IP addressing and will be using the last good address as the default gateway address.
Serial links will use the 50.75.120.0/30 network on all serials.
Default route set to main via VAs next hop.
VA will be using NAT overload to Main via local interface.
VA
Fa0/0= 172.16.81.254
Fa0/1=172.16.82.126
S0/0/0=50.75.120.130
Main s0/0/1= 50.75.120.129 with a clock rate of 128kbps
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1376 bytes
version 12.4
no service timestamps log datetime msec
no service timestamps debug datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname VA
enable secret 5 $1$mERr$3nisV1NYMTmTN5PhTMBC2/
enable password insurance
ip dhcp excluded-address 172.16.81.235 172.16.81.254
ip dhcp pool VA-dhcp
network 172.16.80.0 255.255.254.0
default-router 172.16.81.254
spanning-tree mode pvst
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 172.16.81.254 255.255.254.0
ip nat inside
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 172.16.82.126 255.255.255.128
ip nat inside
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Serial0/0/0
ip address 50.75.100.130 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
interface Serial0/0/1
no ip address
shutdown
interface Vlan1
no ip address
shutdown
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Serial0/0/0 overload
ip nat inside source list 2 interface Serial0/0/0 overload
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0/1
ip route 50.74.100.128 255.255.255.252 50.74.100.130
access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 2 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
banner motd ^C
Restricted access to all unauthorized users, proceed at your will. Unauthorized users will be prosecuted to the extend of the law. ^C
line con 0
password shots
login
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password xrays
login
end
VA(config)#
A network beginner, thank you in advance :))
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Reyna,
I can see a couple of issues
Your static routes:-
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0/1
ip route 50.74.100.128 255.255.255.252 50.74.100.130
Ser 0/0/1 is shut and has no ip addressing.
The route to 50.74.100.128 has no way to reach the next hop 50.74.100.130
Your NAT translations are both the same therfore only one is effective.
Just tidy up a little:-
The only static route you need is a default route:-
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 50.75.100.129
The NAT only requires one list and trans pointing out the outside interface
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Serial0/0/1 overload
access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
Regards,
Alex.
Please rate useful posts.

How to count number of default routes in routing table

Is there a way for java to count the number of default routes in the routing table?

Hi Sathish,
If you are using table mean surely you are binding the table to some model like JSON model. You can bind the checked value of the column with the checkbox in the template. So while checking you can directly check the property by taking the reference from the model. Navigate through all the objects in the model and check the property you wanted.
This is the logic I have used to get the checked property form the table column. My table id is "tableId" and it is being binded with "/tableModelData" of json model.
var myModel = sap.ui.getCore().getElementById("tableId").getModel().getProperty("/tableModelData");
for(var i= 0 ; i< myModel.length ; i++)
var singleObject = myModel [i];
if(singleObject.checked == true){
your logic.

How do I inject a static default route into vrf

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for