How does Mac Pro compare to iMac?

Ok I'm Pisssed!
I just bought a mac pro with AMD FirePro D700 6144 MB to photo editing. I noticed that it's a bit sluggish with my 4k Dell monitor. I figured what I can do I already have the best mac there is guess I'll have to live with it.
And then BAM, the new iMac comes out with AMD Radeon R9 M295X. Will it perform better with photo editing?

Actually you are wrong.
You can change CPU in mac pro, but you cannot fit inside anything better or newer as you are limited to specific TDP and chipset. For instance, putting in new generation of xeon won't give you TB3 support and so on. It can also lead to instability of the system overall. So in basic words: you shouldn't change CPU you already have inside so no CPU upgrade there as well.
Also iMac is much better in single core performance than mac pro and 99% of applications don't use more than 2 cores and even if they do those actions are not so critical (rendering where you can wait or go get one coffee meantime,...) compared to for instance 3D modelling or animation, where you need smooth rendering and good CPU real-time computation.
Also new radeon R9 M290X and M295X is much better supported from AMD side and also in windows. We all know OS X 3D performance is miserable compared to windows and having one year old drivers for mac pro GPU's (13.25 version) compared to newest radeon drivers (14.9).
In addition to all, 4K monitors are very poorly supported on mac pro. For example sometimes when I start OS X half of the screen remains black on my dell UP2414Q and only solution is to restart my computer again. Dell says that they haven't tested with apple hardware and it should be apple to fix this while apple says dell should fix it while customers remain in the dark and with poor support. Thank you dell and apple.
And there is more bad news for apple: adobe has started to shift their support to nvidia and windows system as Illustrator CC2014.2 now supports hardware accelerated graphics rendering with nvidia GPU on windows! And even more, new GTX980 beats any AMD cards on the market and AMD probably won't make anything better because they can't. I never understood apple latest fascination with AMD. AMD is the worst company for GPU's and their support is so bad I'm considering selling my mac pro.
The release of new iMac with 5K was a big slap in the face of professional apple customers who paid big money for their pro machine which can only run final cut pro X in it's full power. Any other software is unable to utilize all that "power" that apple put into mac pro. It's a big shame and a good waste of money to have just a nice room warmer.
Instead of fixing old things apple went and made new version of consumer class PC that is better or at least equivalent to pro class PC's the sell.
What apple need to fix is:
-10-bit support for displays. I don't know why we throw so much money on good displays when computer only outputs 8bit at the end.
-drop AMD and pick up nvidia cards. Apple already supports openCL 1.2 with nvidia cards under OS X and nvidia offers physX and CUDA in addition to only openCL that AMD offers. Also nvidia drivers are much more stable and performance of nvidia cards is better in all aspects.
-give more support to developers like adobe and others to upgrade their software to take advantage of GPU's we throw so much money on. What good is it to have a good computer and then software that can't even use that computer in it full potential except only few operations while majority of operations are still slow and laggy.
-give better support for 3D under OS X. Right now I'm watching like 9-30 FPS in Maya and Unity, and sometimes I even run some games to free my mind. WoW hardly reaches 60FPS on low settings while under windows bootcamp on same hardware I can get easily 60FPS! OS X still only has openGL 4.1, while we have there 4.3 and 4.4 GPU's out.
There has been almost one year since the release of this mac pro and nothing pretty much changed. This "pro" computer is actually pretty slow compared to what competition offers and the only good thing on mac is now the friendliness of OS X, stability and good integration with everything which windows lacks. But overall it's a very slow system to work on. Apple promised much but we got nothing of it except high price tag and a lot of lost nerves!
I'm very very disappointed in apple right now and really considering switching back to normal PC where at least I get latest drivers for everything and things at least runs at normal frame rate I can work with.
And don't even let me start on new Yosemite "flat" look which they obviously copied from windows and it is ugly as ****. Instead of changing icons they should fix old mac problems and give us professionals more to work with. In reality we get slapped and pushed on the edge. Don't try and make professional multimedia computer if you can't support it!

Similar Messages

  • How does Mac Mini compare to iMac?

    My iMac needs to be replaced. Do users like the Mac mini as well as other Mac computers? Is it as troublefree? Easy to use?

    I don't have an iMac, so take everything I say with a gain of salt...
    However, I do have a mac mini. Obviously, the iMac will be faster, have a nice LCD, whereas the mac mini is going to be slower because it uses an out of date G4 CPU. Also, the hard drive is (I believe) slower, and it's a lot harder from what i've heard to upgrade ram. that's not to say it can't be done, I've voided my mac mini's warranty 2 times now, the first time upgrading the ram, the 2nd time in a daunting hard drive upgrade.
    If you don't plan on upgrading the computer anytime soon though, there's nothing wrong with it. I use mine for some video editing and photoshopping, but mostly it's just left on 24/7 as a file server and every now and then used for AIM and word.
    When you get it, and take it out of the box, you need to plug in a power cable, mouse, keyboard, (probably buy a USB hub) speakers if you have any, and a monitor.
    All in all, it's a full working macintosh computer, minus some nice extras (such as more than 2 USB ports), but it works just like any othe mac, uses finder like the iMac, and quite honestly, if you have a spare LCD, I think it's a better buy if you are only going to be doing word processing/email on it.
    Once you start upgrading the DVD/CD+RW to a dvdrw, and boosting the ram to get most speed and such, I would forget about getting it though, since it's innatley slower than the iMac (but CPU, GPU, RAM, and HDD wise), and you'd be better off spending the money on the iMac.
    In short, if you only use your mac for email and office documents, it's the best bang for your buck ever. If you need your mac for other stuff (such as video editing) you might be better off going with an iMac. There is, however, nothing wrong with the mini at all that stops it from being a fully functional mac.
    P.S. I'd wait until after the next macworld expo thing in january to buy, as they are rumored to be releasing new products, which would drop the prices of the current lineup.

  • How does mac mini compare to PPC G5?

    My company runs PowerPC G5s dual 2GHz/1GB RAM OS 10.4.11. We are looking to upgrade to CS5 which requires Intel Macs and we don't need the expansion capability of a tower, we recently purchased new 24" LaCie monitors, so we don't need monitors -- how do the mac minis compare? We use QuarkXPress, Illustrator, Photoshop, Dreamweaver, MSOffice, Entourage, FileMaker Pro.
    I'm considering the 2.66GHz/8GB RAM/320HD -- don't need alot of internal storage because we are on a Windows network.

    I replaced my 2004 PowerMac G5 dual 2Ghz with a Mac mini server and it's been great.  I got the most recent server with two internal hard drives and set them up as a RAID stripe.  I added an external blu-ray player / dvd burner.  It worked out to be a better bargain that way.  I couldn't find the benchmarks I recorded at the time but you can browse the geekbench results which is always helpful.  They show 1734 for your G5 while the mini is scored at 3634 so that is twice as fast!  Geekbench only measures CPU and doesn't account for graphics performance.  The mini does use shared memory but I've not found it to be a problem.  I really like the mini's ultra low power usage compared to the G5.
    You still get dual threads but an iMac would be much better in terms of threads but I know you'd rather use your monitors.  Cost vs performance the iMac is a much better deal, I actually got an iMac but returned multiple due to the 'yellow tinge' problem and decided to get the mini instead.  Apple may put a newer Core chip in on the next mini refresh which would likely double the performance.

  • How does Macbook Pro compare to G4/800 Powermac

    I currently have a G4/800 Quicksilver Powermac with 1Gb of memory, two 7200rpm hard drives, and a ATI RAdeon 7500 GPU with 32Mb of RAM.
    I mainly use my computer for amateur photograph editing (Photoshop elements) and video-editing (imovie and Final cut express), and I play the occasional game (older games like wolfenstein, medal of honor, warcraft 3). I've read a lot on this forum about how crappy the GMA in the macbook is, but to give me an idea, how does it compare to my equally crappy ATI radeon 7500 ? Would the macbook be ok to play games like C&C generals, Homeworld 2 and other 3D strategy games ? I like the occasional 3D shooter but I don't need the graphical splendour of Quake 4. And I've read that Final Cut pro has some issues with the macbook but I suppose Final cut express would be ok ?
    How would the 2Gh Macbook compare to my G4 Quicksilver speedwise overall (I would max out the ram in the macbook) ?
    G4/800 QS - G3/400 Pismo PB Mac OS X (10.3.9)
    G4/800 QS - G3/400 Pismo PB Mac OS X (10.3.9)

    I dunno your asking a MBP question in the MacBook
    forum.
    Try asking in the correct forum.
    If I were to hazard a guess, I'd say that the MBP
    would be faster then the QS on all accounts even when
    running photoshop (which would run under rosetta).
    The G4 has faster drives going for it, but overall
    the MBP specs are superior to the g4 so my vote is
    that yuor going to see an improvement. The only
    suggestion I'd give is boost the ram to at least a
    gig and your doing a lot of photoshop work,then get
    1.5 to 2.0 gig.
    Mike
    Sorry, I actually meant the Macbook.

  • I recently changed from a Mac Pro to an iMac. A large chunk of emails have disappeared. Time Machine is no help. Any ideas as to how I can get them back?

    I recently changed from a Mac Pro to an iMac. Despite using Migration Assistant, a large chunk of my recent emails and nearly all of my wife's emails have disappeared in transit. Strangely, emails from my distant past are still there. Time Machine is no help; the messages may be on my backup disc but they're behind an invisible  icon. Any ideas as to how I can get them back?

    Quit Mail. Force quit if necessary.
    Back up all data. That means you know you can restore the Mail database, no matter what happens.
    Triple-click the text on the line below to select it:
    ~/Library/Mail/V2/MailData/Envelope Index
    Copy the selected text to the Clipboard (command-C). In the Finder, select
    Go ▹ Go to Folder
    from the menu bar. Paste into the box that opens (command-V), then press return.
    A Finder window will open with a file selected. Move the selected file to the Desktop, leaving the window open. Other files in the folder may have names that begin with "Envelope Index". Move those files, if any, to the Trash.
    Log out and log back in. Relaunch Mail. It should prompt you to re-import your messages. You may get a warning that the index is corrupt and that Mail has to quit. Click OK.
    Test. If Mail now works as expected, you can delete the file you moved to the Desktop. Otherwise, post your results.

  • How many device can one sync with iPhone? I own a Mac Pro and an iMac desktop. Can I sync with both machines?

    How Many devices can I sync with my iPhone?  I own a Mac PRO and an iMAC.  Depends on where I am, I will plug my iPhone to either of the machines. I haven't sync with either machine yet.

    Dah•veed wrote:
    Please explain how one would accomplish that feat.
    There's not much to explain. When a device is connected, you see the row of different categories across the top: Summary, Info, Apps, Tones, Music, Movies, TV Shows, Podcasts, Books, and Photos. For example, it is perfectly safe to sync one iOS device to the Music category on Computer A and no other computer, and the same device to Photos on Computer B and no other computer.
    You might be confusing what I'm saying with one iOS device enabling sync to the Music library on multiple computers. That is a huge no-no and will result in the disaster being suggested. But I am not talking about that, I'm talking about the opposite arrangement. What I am describing preserves category exclusivity. It turns out that exclusivity at the category level, not the computer level, is what really matters.
    As long as a device is synced to a given category on only one computer, it doesn't matter which computer it is or whether that computer is different than the ones synced to on other categories. The instant a given category is enabled for syncing on more than on computer, that is where the trouble starts.
    KiltedTim wrote:
    Trying to do so is asking for trouble. Don't do it. Move the content you need to one machine and sync only with that machine. If you don't, you'll be back here asking how to fix the mess and recover all the stuff you lost...
    I will agree that it is something you should only do mindfully. But if you do make sure each category is syncing to only one device, there will be no data loss and no mess.

  • How can i sync mac pro w  my27 imac?

    New to macs so curious how to properly setup a network connecting mac pro, ipad and imac... thx in advance for any assistance.

    Well, "sync" and "network" mean a lot of different things to different people.
    To start with, you can set up file sharing, allowing you to access each computer across the same network. Go to System Preferences - Sharing, and turn on File Sharing. Change the computer name at the top of the Sharing screen to allow you to identify it better if need be. Then, in each Finder sidebar, you'll see the Shared computers. You can log into them from your other Macs using a valid user login belonging to the shared Mac.
    Let me know if there was something else you wanted to do...
    Matt

  • I just replaced my mac pro with an iMac and i can't get it to work with my epson stylus 3800 printer?

    i just replaced my mac pro with an iMac and i can't get it to work with my epson stylus 3800 printer? i have downloaded the 3800 software three times and the imac keeps telling me there is no software to run the printer? Any help here?

    Care to share which OS you are using?

  • How does Mac OS calculate the charging Cycle count?

    Hello, Guys
    How does Mac OS calculate the charging Cycle count? I just used my MBP for about 15 min without power plugged in and I saw it left about 90% battery. However after the battery be recharged, I checked system profiler. It shows charging cycle count increased 1. I do remember that last time I left almost the same percentage of battery and plugged in. After the battery was fully charged, profiler did show cycle count increased.
    So I am wondering How does Mac OS calculate the charging Cycle count? Basing on the percentage left or something else?
    Thanks,

    Ok,
    But does it count continuously or separatly? I mean One time I used 10% and recharged full; and next time I used 20% and fully recharged again. Does the OS increase the cycle count when the usage adds up to 100% no matter how many times of recharge?
    Thanks,

  • How does premiere pro CC work with nvidia GT 630M (2GB) vega???!

    how does premiere pro CC work with nvidia GT 630M (2GB) vega????!

    That will work. I would just not expect major performance with a heavier load on playback.
    Eric
    ADK

  • How does Oracle Database compare with IBM DB2?

    Hi
    thank you for reading my post
    How Does ORACLE Database compare with IBM DB2 ?
    Which one has better performance with similar workload?
    Which one perform better on System Z hardware and z/OS?
    Is there any document that compare these two product?
    Thanks.

    Hi
    The below link may useful to you.
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availability/pdf/CWP_HA_Oracle10gR2_DB28.2.pdf
    With best regards
    Shan

  • Does Mac Pro Intel Runs Os 9???

    Hello All I am Using a G4 quicksilver and now planing to buy a Mac Pro G5 Intel... I just want to ask.. does Mac Pro Runs Os 9.2 ??? cause i use few softwares that only runs on Os 9 and i dont want o lose them...
    Any Help will be really appreciated...

    For future reference:
    The G5 was a CPU chip made by IBM. The Intel means an Intel made CPU. So you would be buying a Mac Pro with an Intel chip and not a G5.
    J.C

  • Does Mac Pro support SLI in Bootcamp? - Why not in MacOS?

    Hi!,
    I only have two questions:
    - Does Mac Pro support SLI in Bootcamp?
    - Why not in MacOS?
    Thanks and... cheers!

    Yes, the Mac Pro does support SLI in Boot Camp, however, Apple does not currently provide drivers for SLI in Mac OS X, this might come in the future.

  • How does a 1.1 mac pro compare to a new 2.2 ghz macbook pro - for after effects/ 3d type work?

    Hi
    For my home computer that I also use for some motion graphics tasks outside of work - I have a 1.1 mac pro thats getting a little long in the tooth.
    My 2 preferred options at the moment are upgrade the processors to some X5355s or sell this and stump up the extra cash (lots) for a 2.2 macbook pro.
    I was wondering if anyone had experience/opinions on the speed comparison between these 2 when it comes to after effects and cinema 4d rendering tasks.
    Geekbench shows that I will get slightly better numbers with the macbook but does this translate directly to render speed or are there other considerations such as advantages gained with the larger mac pro architecture?
    Any thoughts welcome
    Thanks!

    Apple Special Mac Pro

  • How loud is Mac Pro compared to Mac mini G4?

    I use a 1,25 Ghz Mac mini G4. At normal use it is almost inaudible. I would like to know, how much louder a Mac Pro is, compared to the mini.

    I have both a G4 Mac mini (the "stealth" 1.5GHz model with 64MB VRAM) and the 2.66GHz Mac Pro. Under light load or when in idle the Mac mini makes much less noise than does the Mac Pro. However, the Mac mini fan can ramp up pretty loud when it has been under heavy load for more than a minute or two and in that case the mini is louder than anything I've yet heard from my Mac Pro. If you do little more than browse the internet, write emails, use Word/iWork, run iTunes, and/or watch a few low resolution movies then the Mac mini will be quieter. However, if you encode video, run extensive filters in Photoshop, or play 3D games then the Mac Pro will probably be quieter. This assumes, of course, that you have the passively cooled NVIDIA 7300 card and not one of the higher-end video cards which require their own fan to keep them cool.
    Now the Intel-based Mac mini is a different story. I've used one of the dual-core Mac minis and it always seems to be quiet, so if you want near silence then one of the current Intel Mac minis is the way to go (IMO).

Maybe you are looking for

  • ICON SIZE ON BUTTON

    hi all, i want to increase the icon size and using it on button. the problem is icon size cannot be increase i used different type of icons with different sizes i.e. 16x16 32x32 65x65 but it shows same size in all icons. can any know about it. Shakee

  • How to export to a word document in ADF

    Hi the case is that i need to export a form of input fields in a jspx page to a word document?? appreciate any help Thanx

  • Trying to restore ipod classic. Mounts as HD, itunes doesn't see it.

    How can I restore my ipod if itunes can't see it? Any ideas? Any help much appreciated. Thanks

  • Does the warranty continue in the refurbished phone?

    I bought my iPhone 5 from a local carrier in June 2013, and in June 2014 it had to be repaired. Instead of repairing the phone, I was given a new one which was obviously a refurbished iPhone 5. Since Finland has a two year warranty for all electronic

  • Unable to save images linked to from InDesign CS4

    A very annoying issue.  If images are linked to from InDesign, and a user on the network has opened that InDesign file, changes to the image cannot be saved.  On a mac we get a warning that the file is 'in use'.  The PCs give no warning, and apprentl