How much of a difference is there, if any, between an MBP A1260 and MBP A1286??

I want to get a cover for my refurbished Macbook Pro and though my model # isn't "listed" in my System Preferences what I do get is MacBook Pro4,1 Early 2008. I asked through here if someone could tell me what model that was and I was told A1260. When I have searched for covers for my MBP A1260, I keep getting A1286. Is there a big difference or is that in the same series so that if I ordered the cover it would fit or it will be too big or too small?? Thanks for any help with this.........much appreciated.

Here is a view of the A1260 specs which are for an MBP early-2008 model 15".
And the A1286 specs which are for an MBP late-2008 and above model 15".
They are both 15" models so size-wise you shouldn't have a problem getting the cover you want for an A1286 model.

Similar Messages

How much real world difference would there be between the 1600MHz memory of a 4,1 Mac Pro and the 800MHz memory of a 3,1 Mac Pro? My main app is multitrack audio with Pro Tools. Thanks so much.

How much real world performance difference would there be between the 1600MHz memory of a 4,1 Mac Pro and the 800MHz memory of a 3,1 Mac Pro? My main app is multitrack audio with Pro Tools. Thanks so much. The CPU speed of either one would be between 2.8GHz and 3.0GHz.

What are the differences.... firmware and build, there were tweaks to the PCIe bus itself. As a result 3rd party cards and booting is better.
Support in 5,1 firmware for more 56xx and W35/36xx processors. Also memory timing.
The 4,1 was "64-bit boot mode optional" and 5,1 was default. I don't know if there are changes but I assume so, even if it is not reflected elsewhere or in version number.
I don't know what the prices are but 2009, to buy one today, when the 2010 is $1800.
The 2008 of course was test bed for 64-bit UEFI and it sure seems even Lion and then ML are not as well engineered - outside of Linc who would be the least likely to have a problem.
I would assume 2010 has better support for 8GB and even 16GB DIMMs as well as for 1333MHz.
Nehalem family had only come out in fall 2008 and a lot of work went into making improvements well past 2009.
If you remember, there were serious heat problems with those and 10.5.7+ up thru 10.6.2 even with iTunes, audio, and hyperthreading and cores hitting and staying in 80*C range. That I assume was both poor code (sleep does not mean poke and ask constantly) as well as changes in SMC and kernel improvements, to work around. Microcode can be patched in firmware, kernel, by drivers and by code, but it is best when the chips and core elements don't need to be.
If someone is stretched, and can get 2009 for $1200 it might be a fine fit. That year offered the OEM GT120 which isn't really as nice and matched for today both OS and apps that rely on a GPU. And for odd reasons two such 120's don't work well in Lion+ but that is probably minor. Having the 5770 is just "nicer" though.
There are some articles about trouble booting with PCIe SATA/SAS/SSD and less trouble with 2010. Also support for graphic card and audio I think was one of those "minor" 5770 related support issues. But shows some small changes were made there too.
I wish someone would come out and pre-announce DDR4 + SATA3 along with PCIe 3.x (for bandwidth and more power per rail) along with say Ivy Bridge-E socket processors was going to be this summer's 3 yr anniversary and to replace the 2010 designed motherboard. But that is what is on Intel's and others drawing boards simmeringn in the pot.

How much of a difference is there between 2 GB and 3 GB RAM in Macbook Core Duo 2 GHz

I upgraded the memory in a Macbook Core Duo 2.0 to 2 GB, as per Apple specs, but now find that the unit could handle 3 GB. Is there a significant difference between 2 GB and 3 GB running Tiger and for light uses such as word processing and web surfing? Would it be worth the expense upgrading to 3 GB? Also, could such an upgrade be done with a 2 GB stick plus a 1 GB stick or do the two sticks have to be identical?
Thanks.

I'm assuming that you have a model 2,1 since that's the only one with the 3gb limit. Since the difference between 3gb and 4gb is only $12 it's up to you. http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/MacBook/DDR2/
OWC tests have found that there is a slight speed increase with having two 2gb sticks in rather than one 1gb and one 2gb. Your model is in the gray lines at the bottom of the graph. http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/Memory_Benchmark/Apple_MacBook/
You can put two 2gb RAM sticks in your model 2,1 but it can only use 3,3gb. This is a hardware limitation and cannot be changed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_GB_barrier
To see which model you have go to the Apple in the upper left corner and select About This Mac, then click on More Info. When System Profiler comes up check the Model Identifier.

HT4623 I lost my apps and iTunes after a restore, but it says there isn't enough space on the iPhone 4. How do I know how much space needs to be freed up? I keep deleting photos and videos, but I'm still getting the same message.

I did an iphone 4 software update. It then asked me to do a "restore" in order for me to be able to use the latest iTunes. I did a "restore" to "factory settings" (this was the only option listed) thinking I'd be able to sync later and get everything back and ended up losing all my purchased apps and iTunes. When I open iTunes, "Welcome to your new iphone" and it says I can re-do the "restore" and choose my lastest update. I assume this will give me back my apps and iTunes. When i choose to do this, it says there isn't enough space on the iPhone. How do I know how much space needs to be freed up? I keep deleting photos and videos from the phone, but I'm still getting the same message every time I re-try. I don't want to delete everything, but I don't know what to do...? Thanks!

Thanks but I think it has something to do with the 'restore'. in the newest iTunes 11, when I click on the tab "iphone", it redirects me to the "welcome to your new iphone" page and asks about doing a 'restore'. I already did a 'restore', but it went to the original factory settings and I want to 'restore' to my lastest back up as of April 12. When I choose that option, it says my iphone doesn't have enough space. I don't know how much I need to delete in order to make it work. I've deleted lots, but it only has 4.1 GB available. I'm not sure why this isn't enough to do a 'restore'. I don't want to delete all my photos and videos, but maybe I will have to?...7.7GB is used up for that. I can't sync or do ANYTHING...

Is there a way to find out how much data was used over the lifetime of my phone (cumulative cellular and wifi)?

Is there a way to find out how much data was used over the lifetime of my phone (cumulative cellular and wifi)?
I was just curious

Given that the phone doesn't track how much data is used over WiFi, no. And cellular data usage can be reset.

How much it cost for replacement of ipad mini 2 lcd with retina and touch screen

how much it cost for replacement of ipad mini 2 lcd with retina and touch screen

Apple's Limited Warranty http://www.apple.com/legal/warranty/ for iPad excludes coverage for damage resulting from accident, disassembly, unauthorized service and unauthorized modifications.
The warranty will apply to the country of purchase. And if there is a problem needing repair you have to return it to the country of purchase.
Out-of-Warranty Service
If you own an iPad that is ineligible for warranty service but is eligible for Out-of-Warranty (OOW) Service, Apple will replace (Apple doesn't repair) your iPad with an iPad that is new or equivalent to new in both performance and reliability for the Out-of-Warranty Service fee listed below. (The replacement will most likely be a refurbished iPad in a brown box, however, it has a new screen, back and battery.)
iPad model
Out-of-Warranty Service Fee
iPad mini
$219
iPad 3rd, 4th, Air
$299
iPad 2, iPad
$249
A $6.95 shipping fee will be added if service is arranged through Apple and requires shipping. All fees are in US dollars and are subject to local tax.
Certain damage is ineligible for out-of-warranty service, including catastrophic damage, such as the device separating into multiple pieces, and inoperability caused by unauthorized modifications. However, an iPad that has failed due to contact with liquid may be eligible for out-of-warranty service. See http://support.apple.com/kb/index?page=servicefaq&geo=United_States&product=ipad
iPad Repair and Service
http://www.apple.com/support/ipad/repair/
Make a Genius Bar Reservation
http://www.apple.com/retail/geniusbar/
You may can get the iPad repaired at 3rd party repair sources for less $, however, any remaining Apple warranty will be voided.
iCracked - Broken iPhone, iPod or iPad
http://www.icracked.com/
iReVamp Electronics Screen Repair ($99)
http://www.irevampelectronics.com/ipad-2-broken-glass-screen-repair.html
iPad Repair & Screen Replacement Services
http://www.ifixyouri.com/16-ipad-repairs
RepairZoom iPad Repair
http://www.repairzoom.com/ipad-repair.html
Mission Repair
http://www.missionrepair.com/Apple_iPad_Repair_Services_s/431.htm
iGadgetResQ
http://www.igadgetresq.com/ipad-repair/
Do It Yourself iPad Repair
http://www.ifixit.com/Device/iPad
 Cheers, Tom

If i delete mail in G-mail than automatically delete in Thunderbird, How can I prevent from this there is any solution to remain mail in thunderbird?

If i delete mail in G-mail than automatically delete in Thunderbird, How can I prevent from this there is any solution to remain mail in thunderbird?

If you have a gmail IMAP mail account, you need to understand tht you are remotely viewing the server folders, so basically the folders you see in Thunderbird are the same folders you see when you use webmail - (logon to google account via browser).
If you want to delete emails off the server, but keep those specific emails accessible in Thunderbird, then you need to move/copy them from the Thunderbird IMAP gmail mail account and store them in Local Folders account in suitably created folders before you delete them from the IMAP mail account.

Is there a relation between Adobe Photoshop CS6 and Photoshop Premiere 12?

Is there a relation between Adobe Photoshop CS6 and Photoshop Premier 12. I am presently attending a course on CS6. Is there a certain similitude between these 2 logiciels?

Hi Luciebiss,
Photoshop is a professional tool used throughout many industries as the standard for digital image manipulation and painting. It has very rich, and often complex, tools and options. As such, it comes with a professional price tag.
Photoshop Elements is a consumer product. It's made for users who don't need as many features and complex options. It has a simpler design, guided workflows, and an organizer to help you manage your files.
Please refer to below link for more information.
https://forums.adobe.com/message/4568487
Thanks

Difference, if any, between using a DynPage and an AbstractPortalComponent

can any one explain me the difference, if any, between using a DynPage and an AbstractPortalComponent in a Portal Application Project?

Refer this , you will get your basics cleared.
Introduction to Custom java iViews with SAP Portal Development Kit
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/664a0957-0601-0010-69a0-c2de856d31d3
Hope it helps.
Avi.

How much time Servlet Object is there in webcontainer

Hi
Friends,
I have created one servlet . After configuring the application i have placed this in webcontainer . I have sent first request it excecuted successfully.I have not sent any request to this Servlet up to 24hrs. So how much time the servlet object will be placed inside the webcontainer?
regards
ram

Hi
Friends,
I have created one servlet . After configuring the application i have placed this in webcontainer . I have sent first request it excecuted successfully.I have not sent any request to this Servlet up to 24hrs. So how much time the servlet object will be placed inside the webcontainer?
regards
ram

How much would it be to add 2 more lines with unlimited talk and text?

I would like to find out how much three lines would cost with unlimited talk and text

BE WARNED!!!!
I was just hammered by Verizon because I added 2 lines. I brought two family members over from other carriers to our "share everything plan". The iphones we ordered came with pre-assigned numbers. The family members wanted to keep their existing numbers and Verizon said to "just have them ported over".
We didn't want, or had any use for the numbers that Verizon assigned the two new phones. When I got the phones I called the Port center at Verizon and they walked me through getting the numbers over from the other network. They had me activate the phones and then ported the numbers over (spend about a day on the process).
So I just got my bill and was outraged. Verizon charged me $78 for the lines of the phones they sent. I was charged $78 just to activate the line so that a number could be ported over. So now I have an extra $156 on my bill not to mention the $$$ they added on to have the numbers ported over. So adding two people to my family share plan cost me $327.

Difference with CD auto-mount between OL 5.7 and OEL 5.4

Hello,
I'm experiencing a difference when auto-mounting a CD between OL 5.7 and OEL 5.4 (x86_64).
Under OEL 5.4, a CD does not have "execute" privileges.
The mount command shows the following relevant entry:
Oracle Linux 5.7:
/dev/hdc on /media/Oracle_11gR2_x86-64 type udf (ro,nosuid,nodev,uid=0)Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.4
/dev/hdc on /media/Oracle_11gR2_x86-64 type udf (ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev,uid=0)I also wonder why there is a difference when using Ubuntu. In Ubuntu Linux (11.04) I can address the problem by installing "autofs" and modifying /etc/auto.misc to include the "exec" mount option. For instance:
cd -fstype=iso9660,ro,nosuid,nodev,exec :/dev/cdromHowever, under Oracle Enterprise Linux, modifying /etc/auto.misc has no affect.
I suspect the the differences are related to gnome-mount and HAL. I know how to work-around the problem, but I wonder if someone knows more details and when and what was changed regarding this issue between OEL 5.4 and OL 5.7
Thanks and kind regards.

Meanwhile I found the source of information:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html-single/5.6_Technical_Notes/index.html#hal
5.6_Technical_Notes
Prior to this update, the "noexec" option was enforced when mounting CDs, preventing scripts on that media from being run automatically. However, this also prevented applications that rely on executing from media from working correctly. Since the intended level of protection provided by this feature is minimal, and there are other ways to achieve it, the feature has been removed and the "noexec" option is no longer enforced.

Differences in optimizations during compilation between java 1.4 and 1.5

Hi
I have an application which frequently runs into out of memory error. After doing some profiling, I found that it has more to do with the throughput of the application. Because which, messages that have to be polled from a queue are not being dequeued. This application has been compiled in java 1.5. But when I compiled the same in java 1.4, I didn't get into this problem.
When I de-compiled the class files, I found that in 1.5, for every string concatenation, the compiler replaces it with StringBuilder() and appends the string. To check whether this object instantiation might be causing the trouble, I wrote a small snippet:
private static void doWithConcatenationOperator() {
for (int idx = 0; idx < fNumIterations; idx++) {
String result = "Does" + "StringBuilder()" + "reduce"
+ "ThroughPut" + "of the" + "Application";
private static void doWithStringBuilder() {
for (int idx = 0; idx < fNumIterations; idx++) {
(new StringBuilder()).append("Does").append("StringBuilder()")
.append("reduce").append("ThroughPut").append("of the")
.append("Application").toString();
When I iterate through these loops( 1 million iterations), the concatenation operation takes less than 16 milliseconds whereas the StringBuilder takes upwards of 512 milliseconds.
My question being; are there any other so called optimizations that can reduce the throughput when compiled in 1.5.
Thanks
Edited by: Incubus on Jan 18, 2009 11:00 PM

Incubus wrote:
say I have a code that does:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = "String " + i + " Being " + i + "concatenated " + i + "using " + i + "String" + i + "Builder";
If I compile this in 1.4 ( i.e using javac -source 1.4); the decompiled code looks the same.
But if I do so in 1.5 ( i.e if I decompile the same code compiled using javac -source 1.5), this is how it looks:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = (new StringBuilder).append("String ").append( i).append( " Being ").append( i).append( "concatenated ").append( i).append( "using ").append( i).append( "String").append( i).append( "Builder").toString();
The above was the compile time optimization I was talking about.What makes you think that the decompiler is not the problem?
The ONLY difference between 1.5 and 1.4 in that case is that one uses StringBuilder and one uses StringBuffer. And StringBuffer is faster.
Just wanted to know, are there any other differences in compile time optimizations between 1.4 and 1.5.I suggest that you go look at the read me. And I also suggest that you become familar with byte codes and stop assuming that a decompiler is going to tell you anything.

Differences in JCE policy files between java 1.4 and 1.5?

I'm using a app that needs JCE unlimited strength policy files to start. Attempting to start with limited strength policy files with Java 1.4 installed will give:
java.security.InvalidKeyException: InitVerify error: java.lang.RuntimeException: engineGetKeySize() is not supported by this cipher!
however, running the same app on java 1.5 with limited strength policy files does not give this problem. I've checked http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/jce/JCERefGuide.html#AppE and http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/jce/JCERefGuide.html#AppE and the maximum allowed keysizes are identical. Has something else changed in the JCE policy files between these java versions? Can anyone tell me what's going on?

Incubus wrote:
say I have a code that does:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = "String " + i + " Being " + i + "concatenated " + i + "using " + i + "String" + i + "Builder";
If I compile this in 1.4 ( i.e using javac -source 1.4); the decompiled code looks the same.
But if I do so in 1.5 ( i.e if I decompile the same code compiled using javac -source 1.5), this is how it looks:
public void StringConcat(){
int noOfIter = 10000;
for(int i = 0; i < noOfIter; i++){
String s = (new StringBuilder).append("String ").append( i).append( " Being ").append( i).append( "concatenated ").append( i).append( "using ").append( i).append( "String").append( i).append( "Builder").toString();
The above was the compile time optimization I was talking about.What makes you think that the decompiler is not the problem?
The ONLY difference between 1.5 and 1.4 in that case is that one uses StringBuilder and one uses StringBuffer. And StringBuffer is faster.
Just wanted to know, are there any other differences in compile time optimizations between 1.4 and 1.5.I suggest that you go look at the read me. And I also suggest that you become familar with byte codes and stop assuming that a decompiler is going to tell you anything.

There no connection between my iPhone 4 and my MBP?

Hello!
There no connection between my MBP made in 2010 running OS X Lion 10.7.3 and my iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1. I don't understand what is wrong. The pairing between them exist, but iPhone still without connection. Please help me!

Hi,
Firstly please check to see if your printer in the list:
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4356
If YES, you can use this to fix/setup:
http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/assistant/airprint/
If NO you have to print using other apps (if applicable) such as
http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/hp-eprint/id299531647?mt=8
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

How much of a difference is there, if any, between an MBP A1260 and MBP A1286??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for