How much performance do I gain by enable MAT

Hi
I must try to ask you guys before am try to enable MAT
I have never entered the bios before so am a little scared that I will f-up the system.
Do anybody here at this forum with similar memory and componemts have tryed to this MAT function.
Must it be "Turbo" or "Ultra turbo" to activate MAT?
How much performance do I gain by this.....do I notice it in games....Battlefield 1942 for an example..or?
If the system do not like it...what happens, shutdown or? unstable?
Please give some advice.
Mr Lithesteel

MAT will give you at least a 5% increase in memory bandwidth when set to turbo mode regardless of the brand of memory you have. I own a pair of generic value ram and i see an increase of around 5 to 10 percent memory bandwidth when turbo mode is on, however my sytem fails to boot when MAT is set to ultra turbo, try to mess with the bios so you could figure out the best configuration of your system (you could measure memory bandwidth with sisoft sandra http://www.sisoftware.co.uk/), By the way your system is prepped up for hyperthreading, you own an 865pe which means your board is ready for hyperthreading, now unless you own the first generation of pentium4 procs which does not support ht, you are all set to run with hyperthreading, it would be nice if you upgrade to win xp pro or at least win2k so that you would be able to maximize your system's potential, Win XP home edition does not support multi-threading so youre loosing a lot of performance with it. Hope i helped you with your question.

Similar Messages

How much performance can I get from my macbook?

It's older then 2,5 years but still quite good for my needs. It has a 2.16 GHz Core 2 Duo and I never use all the CPU, it has 2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM and I use it all. I am not using all the 120 GB of 5400 rpm HDD but I use it often and I feel how much it is slow. Intel GMA950 is slow also, but it seems to be enough for me and is able to manage my external LCD at 1920x1200 resolution.
So I am thinking about two possible ways to have more performance:
1. get a new macbook pro of 13" with 4GB RAM, newer disk (may be faster);
2. upgrade my RAM, my Disk and may be my OS.
I know that I can use only 3.3 GB of RAM if I place 2 x 2GB 667MHz so-dimms: one more GB free could make difference for me.
About the disk, I know that my SATA is limited to 1.5 Gigabits but, using AJA System Test, I see that my internal drive is able to read and write about 29 MB/s, that seems to be even slower of my external 7200 drive that is using a Firewire 400 connection (39 MB/s).
It seems to me that newer HDDs on market, eg. Seagate Momentus.4 5400 rpm, are able to give much better transfer rate. My SATA should be able to manage transfer rates till 180MB/s so SATA II HDD should not suffer of it. Is it right?
Finally I could upgrade to Snow Leopard that should be a little bit faster then Leopard and with a completely new better finder.
So my questions are:
1. current 5400 HDD, like seagate Momentus.4, are really double or triple faster then my 2 years old hitachi? Even on my SATA controller?
2. 667 MHz RAM compared to the new 1066MHz could be a bottleneck even at 3.3 GB?
3. if I buy a new macbook pro, 2.53 GHz, 4GB RAM, 250GB HDD, how much performance difference will I notice between this new machine and mine with upgraded RAM, HDD & Os?
It's a difference of about 1.280$ (1.499$ - 220$), so I would be really pleased to listen what you think and know about this kind of upgrade.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Fabio.

Ok, I'll chime in with an opinion at least.
Wait on the new book. Do a $90 ram/$29 OS upgrade and give up on spending money on a HDD.
Ive been looking at upgrades to speed up my laptop till I can afford a new one and have decided to wait 12months till SSD prices drop to $1.75-$2.50/GB. I think I will windup with a faster computer than anything that will come out for another 12 more months. I love getting the latest and greatest, but since I wont be able to afford a whole new computer next year I will be happy with a much faster book.
I am using 65% of my upgraded ram(4/3.3whatever), never all of my cpu and only 35% of my drive space. Also happy with my external LCD monitor.
If this http://www.amazon.com/Intel-160GB-Mainstream-Retail-SSDSA2MH160G2R5/dp/B002IJA1E Q/ref=sr12?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1262409156&sr=8-2 hits $360 it will be a no brainer for me. The 'new computer' option will be right out the window.
Marco

How much performance is impacted if the Stored outline is used globally?

Hi,
One of the queries that we are having problem with and we are trying to use the Stored outline so that we freeze the execution plan. The vendor is telling us that it should set globally (ALTER SYSTEM not SESSION) , but we disagreed because this would have negative effect on our db performance. We ask to enable session only iusing LOGON trigger filtered by program/username nstead of system like below
Vendor preference: ALTER SYSTEM SET CREATE_STORED_OUTLINES=TRUE
We prefer: ALTER SESSION SET CREATE_STORED_OUTLINES=TRUE
BTW, we are on HP UX 10.2.0.3. Any recommendations or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you so much.
Rich.

No Oracle version number.
No information as to the vendor or the product.
No information indicating why a stored outline might be of value in one or many cases.
And most importantly ... no evidence of testing to see if it really makes things better or worse.
Throw this into a test environment and validate your prejudices. There is no way we can possibly
know and there are no general rules when it comes to tuning other than the fact that only testing
on your hardware with your system has value.

Is there a performance loss or gain when enabling 'make available through property nodes' in class accessor?

As the topic states, I'm pondering if there is a performance hit (or gain?) by making class accessor available through property node?
Specifically, I wonder if the 'class accessor property node' is somehow different than 'normal' property nodes, which I tend to avoid as best I can due to how they often involve the GUI thread and are often detrimental to performance.
And since the follow up question to any answer would be to ask if including error handling terminals changes the answer?
-People who write LVOOP on a semi-regular basis or more, is there a concensus on when/if you use the property node option? Is it preferred as a default almost? Is it affected by whether the accessor is dynamic or static?
Thanks!
QFang
QFang
CLD LabVIEW 7.1 to 2013

As far as I know, there is no difference between a subVI call and a property call and they should behave identically behind the scenes. There shouldn't be a forced call in the UI thread, because these don't deal with UI elements. It's simply a different syntax, so it should be the same for DD. I have seen some complaints about performance issues and/or bugs in earlier versions, but I don't remember if there was anything concrete. You can search on LAVA.
Likewise, I don't think the error I/O itself causes delays, but both the serialization of the calls and having case structures acting on those errors can. AQ had some posts on that and he dislikes both. Personally, I tend to like the readability, particularly for serialized calls. Note that some people don't like accessors (at least public ones) as a concept, suggesting that having writers for individual fields leads to all kinds of troubles, and that it's generally better to have specific functions with the relevant inputs.
Try to take over the world!

I'd like to know how much performance difference there is in the 15 in MBP with Retina display?

Hi:
I have a legacy (2007) MBP that needs to be replaced. It still runs, but not well, given that the HD is nearly full. The headphone out jack is "hit or miss" in terms of working properly.....you get the picture.
I'll replace it with a 15 MBP with retina display, and also go with the 1 TB drive rather than the 512 as its actually cheaper (I think) to have Apple put the larger drive in than upgrade after the fact.
My question relates to the available processor speeds:
2.5GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.7GHz
2.8GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 4.0GHz
Is there any discernible difference between these processors, and if so, under what conditions do they manifest themselves, and how significant, generally speaking are the differences.
I'm sure it depends on the software being run and tasks being performed....video rendering, gaming, etc.
I should also mention that I'm not the most patient person (serious understatement) when it comes to the speed of even basic tasks....word processing, itunes, youtube videos, and the like.
I generally work with multiple windows open and with my current computer's age and remaining HD space get the "spinning pinwheel of death" with great frequency.
One last bit of information. I'm a musician and composer, who needs to get into the 21st century and actually use the notation software I've got (Sibelius). Any computer I have needs to be able to play back scores well, which means playing/processing multiple instrumental parts at the same time,
Thanks in advance for your advice,
Michael

The only way you can get a valid estimate is by someone examining the MBP directly. Since no one on these forums can see or examine your MBP, you will need to get this infomation from a qualified repair shop. It seems that you already have secured one estimate. You can also bring the MBP to an Apple store and have a genius bar examine it for FREE.
Ciao.

X301: 250 GB 5400 rpm vs 128 GB Solid State Performance - How Much Difference?

Any idea about how much faster XP Pro will boot with the 128 GB solid state drive vs the 5400 rpm 250 GB drive? And for apps like Word and Excel how much performance difference will there be when launching the apps (doesn't seem like it could be much more than a second or two)? Any idea of the real world performance for writes and reads in terms of Bytes per second? Any users have expereince with both drives using X301s?

The answer to your implied question, "Is 128GB big enough?" is Yes, 128GB is big enough for a Boot Drive.
Mac OS X may only take up 8 to 10GB, but developer tools adds a lot and if you install big Photo or Video Editing tools you might quickly end up at 40GB including Applications.
Mac OS X needs a Swap file and some Paging files as well, and if you do not have enough your Mac Pro will get really weird.
64GB is getting too close for comfort -- effectively too small.
128GB is NOT enough to also store your Photo collection, substantial Tunes Library, or Video editing files. If you have any of those, you will need to move them to a different drive, or get a MUCH larger and more expensive drive, or keep the bulk of them on an external drive that stays on your desk.
You also need a Backup Drive.

How much improvement can I get from this upgrade?

I'm planning to upgrade my system and I'm looking for suggestions on my plan. My current system is:
Intel Core i7 3770
Radeon HD 7570
500Gb SSD for everything
1tb HDD of extra storage
10Gb of RAM
Rendering is slow and a lot of dropped frames occurs when editing 4k in Premiere Pro CC. And my graphics drivers crashes when push the system too hard
This is my parts list for my future build:
Intel Core i7 5820k(will be overclocked)
Asus x99 deluxe motherboard
16Gb ddr4 RAM
Asus STRIX GTX 970
240Gb SSD
the 500Gb SSD and 1tb hard drive will be put I this build.
I have a few questions. How much of a performance improvement(faster renders, lower dropped frames etc.)would I see with this build? If I just upgrade the GPU, an SSD and increase the RAM size to 16Gb to my original system, how much performance improvement would I see? The upgrade to the 5820k will cost $1000 and I'm wondering if I can upgrade everything else except for the CPU, motherboard and ddr4 RAM?
Thanks in advance!

Ok, I'll chime in with an opinion at least.
Wait on the new book. Do a $90 ram/$29 OS upgrade and give up on spending money on a HDD.
Ive been looking at upgrades to speed up my laptop till I can afford a new one and have decided to wait 12months till SSD prices drop to $1.75-$2.50/GB. I think I will windup with a faster computer than anything that will come out for another 12 more months. I love getting the latest and greatest, but since I wont be able to afford a whole new computer next year I will be happy with a much faster book.
I am using 65% of my upgraded ram(4/3.3whatever), never all of my cpu and only 35% of my drive space. Also happy with my external LCD monitor.
If this http://www.amazon.com/Intel-160GB-Mainstream-Retail-SSDSA2MH160G2R5/dp/B002IJA1E Q/ref=sr12?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1262409156&sr=8-2 hits $360 it will be a no brainer for me. The 'new computer' option will be right out the window.
Marco

I need to sort very large Excel files and perform other operations. How much faster would this be on a MacPro rather than my MacBook Pro i7, 2.6, 15R?

I am a scientist and run my own business. Money is tight. I have some very large Excel files (~200MB) that I need to sort and perform logic operations on. I currently use a MacBookPro (i7 core, 2.6GHz, 16GB 1600 MHz DDR3) and I am thinking about buying a multicore MacPro. Some of the operations take half an hour to perform. How much faster should I expect these operations to happen on a new MacPro? Is there a significant speed advantage in the 6 core vs 4 core? Practically speaking, what are the features I should look at and what is the speed bump I should expect if I go to 32GB or 64GB? Related to this I am using a 32 bit version of Excel. Is there a 64 bit spreadsheet that I can us on a Mac that has no limit on column and row size?

Grant Bennet-Alder,
It’s funny you mentioned using Activity Monitor. I use it all the time to watch when a computation cycle is finished so I can avoid a crash. I keep it up in the corner of my screen while I respond to email or work on a grant. Typically the %CPU will hang at ~100% (sometimes even saying the application is not responding in red) but will almost always complete the cycle if I let it go for 30 minutes or so. As long as I leave Excel alone while it is working it will not crash. I had not thought of using the Activity Monitor as you suggested. Also I did not realize using a 32 bit application limited me to 4GB of memory for each application. That is clearly a problem for this kind of work. Is there any work around for this? It seems like a 64-bit spreadsheet would help. I would love to use the new 64 bit Numbers but the current version limits the number of rows and columns. I tried it out on my MacBook Pro but my files don’t fit.
The hatter,
This may be the solution for me. I’m OK with assembling the unit you described (I’ve even etched my own boards) but feel very bad about needing to step away from Apple products. When I started computing this was the sort of thing computers were designed to do. Is there any native 64-bit spreadsheet that allows unlimited rows/columns, which will run on an Apple? Excel is only 64-bit on their machines.
Many thanks to both of you for your quick and on point answers!

I have an older MacBook Intel 2 Duo processor 2.4Gh 4GB mem running 10.6.8. Yahoo just informed me I must upgrade my Safari (5.1.10). How much can I upgrade from 10.6.8 without degrading performance?

I have and older MacBook Intel 2 Duo processor 2.4 Ghz, 4GB mem, running 10.6.8 and Safari 5.1.10. Yahoo has just informed me that they will no longer support Safari 5.1.10 and my question is how much higher than 10.6.8 can I go to get a better Safari before I start reducing performance on an older computer? It is about 6 years old but runs fine for my purposes.

If you want to stay with 10.6, try Firefox which is still being updated.
Firefox
Check that your computer is compatible with Mountain Lion/Mavericks/Yosemite.
To check the model number hold down the option/alt key, go to the Apple menu and select System Information.
MacBook (Late 2008 Aluminum, or Early 2009 or newer) model number 5,1 or higher
MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer) model number 3,1 or higher
Your Mac needs:
OS X v10.6.8 or OS X Lion already installed
2 GB or more of memory (More is better - 4 GB minimum seems to be the consensus)
8 GB or more of available space
Check to make sure your applications are compatible. PowerPC applications are no longer supported after 10.6.
Application Compatibility
Applications Compatibility (2)
Do a backup before installing.
Mountain Lion
If your computer isn’t compatible, you might be able to upgrade to Lion.
Computer Compatibility - Lion                       Lion

How much jvm affects space & performance of DB????

Hi ,
as i know , there are some objects created in system tablespace or something else in the DB after installing jvm.
My question is how much space those object occupted and how those changes affect on the original DB ????
Thanks
Stephen

If you measure the performance as the time required to allocate the initial 600 GB data file plus the time to do the load and compare that to allocating a small file and doing the load, letting the data file autoextend, it's unlikely that you'll see a noticable difference. You'll get far more variation just in moving 600 GB around than you'll lose waiting on the data file to extend. If there is a difference, allocating the entire file up front will be slightly more efficient.
More likely, however, is that you wouldn't count the time required to allocate the initial 600 GB data file since that is something that can be done far in advance. If you don't count that time, then allocating the entire file up front will be much more efficient.
If you may need less than 600 GB, on the other hand, allocating the entire file at once may waste some space. If that is a concern, it may make sense to compromise and allocate a 500 GB file initially (assuming that is a reasonable lower bound on the size you'll actually need) and let the file extend in 1 GB chunks. That won't be the most efficient approach and you may waste up to a GB of space but that may be a reasonable compromise.
Justin

How much RAM for ONE App & does OS X limit allocation?

Hello all,
This question concerns how much RAM I realistically need to run ONE application to it's fullest. I mainly use ProToolsLE 7.3, but sometimes use LogicPro 8 and Final Cut Express 4, again, only one running at a time. I've read on the ProTools forum that Windows (yuck) limits the amount of RAM that can be allocated for 1 application. Does Mac OS 10.4 or 10.5 do this?
Right now I have the stock 1GB (2 x 512MB). I plan on pulling it and installing a matched quad of either 1GB sticks (4GB total) -OR- 2GB sticks (8GB total). I understand that matched quads in slots 1/2 of both risers is optimum for the early Mac Pros.
The ProTools forum isn't helping much. A ProTools support person said that starting with 4GB will be good to start and that they test their systems with 4GB installed. What did they mean by "good to start"? Will it increase jumping to 8GB or is 4GB all ProTools can really use?
Another guy on there said "keep in mind that to use 4GB of ram - you'd need a 64bit Operating system (not supported by pro-tools) or on a MAC PAE support enabled, which depending on your hardware may not be a great move." I dont know what that means! Mac OS 10.5 IS a 64bit OS, right? And ProTools 7.4 NEEDS OS 10.5 to run....even if it is only a 32bit app. (though right now I am running PT 7.3 on OS 10.4....not sure if 10.4 is 64bit)
A quad set of 1GB is under $170 and a quad set of 2GB is under $270. Funds are tight right now, but I think I can swing the extra $100 to double the RAM -IF- it will make a difference.
Any thoughts as to wether the extra $100 will be worth it, or am I wasting my money? Thanks!

Hatter,
Thank you so much for your advice! If I may bother you to receive one final suggestion....
Based on the best prices I have found from all of the well known Mac Pro memory dealers, I have narrowed it down to 3 configurations that are balanced. Even though I'm still not 100% confident that 8GB of RAM will give me any noticable imporvement over 6GB, the price is only $42 more to get 8GB. Am I correct in saying that the early Mac Pro would do better to have one matched quad set of RAM over the new Mac Pro's increased performance of having all eight slots filled? Here are the 3 configurations and prices.
4 x 1GB + 4 x 512MB = 6GB Quad+Quad $220 (using my stock 2x512MB sticks)
4 x 2GB = 8GB Quad $262 (pulling my stock 2x512MB sticks)
8 x 1GB = 8GB Octal $278 (pulling my stock 2x512MB sticks)
Which do you think would be the best route?
I already purchased a WD Caviar for my dedicated audio drive. I installed a Seagate 7200.9 in my PowerMac G4 for it's audio drive, but after reading various reveiws, concluded the WD Caviar is a better performer. I LOVE my WD My Book Studio external. I hadn't considered replacing the boot drive, but after reading articles suggesting that it improves overall system performance, and now that you've recommended it as well, I will probably buy a second Caviar for the boot/system drive.
This computer is a DEDICATED audio computer, for ProTools & Logic only....other than a bit of fiddling in Final Cut Express. It's not even connected to the internet and all unnecessary apps are not installed or uninstalled. I also never migrate apps, but always do a fresh install of everything from the ground up.
Thanks again for your advice! It's been a big help!

How much commands possible in a SOAP Envelope?

Hi all!
How much commands are possible in a single SOAP transaction?
Best regards
Marian

Do you mean like this???
<b>BatchInteract Interface Structure</b>
<i>The BatchInteract method enables you to perform multiple transactions in the database using a single SOAP request message. For example, you can add 1000 items to the database in a single SOAP request message.
The main advantage of using this method instead of the Interact method is that if a single transaction fails all remaining transactions are not affected.
The BatchInteract structure consists of an Envelopes element that contains a separate Envelope element for each transaction as shown below.
</i>
xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
<Envelopes>
    <Envelope>
    </Envelope>
    <Envelope>
    </Envelope>
</Envelopes>
The structure of each envelope is the same as described in DI Server SOAP Message Structure of SDK.

1.66GHz vs. 1.83GHz - How much difference is there?

I'm considering buying a Mac Mini for my fiancee very soon. I do have a question, however. How much real-world speed difference is there between the 1.66GHz and 1.83GHz models? I will be upgrading to 2GB RAM with aftermarket memory for her either way.
She uses Photoshop CS, Adobe Lightroom, Aperture, Safari, iChat, and iTunes most of the time.
Do you think the 1.83GHz model is worth the extra money or not, and why?
Thanks!
Dave

The difference between the two in processing performance is barely noticeable - though it IS noticeable on applications requiring heavy CPU load, such as when rendering video or applying Photoshop filters. It's not a significant difference however, and as with the mini's performance overall, it is somewhat masked by the relatively slow hard drive, but in these uses it gives the more expensive mini a worthwhile edge in performance. In other software, such as iChat, Safari, Mail, iTunes etc, it really won't make any real difference other than helping the system run a little more smoothly and make transition from window to window or application to application a little more seamless. Very marginal improvements.
Really, the greater expense of the top-end mini is more to do with the extra drive capacity (80Gb instead of 60) and the inclusion of a dual lawyer DVD burner in place of the standard CD writer of the cheaper unit. All in all, not a great deal for the extra $200, particularly given the fussy nature of the slot-loading DVD burner.
In my own view, better performance could be gained for less than that extra $200 by hooking up a faster external FW drive to the cheaper model and using that as the boot volume, but if best-possible CPU performance is needed (and with Photoshop in particular it's never a bad idea to have more power) then the $799 model with the larger drive and DVD burner is perhaps wise, with the possible subsequent addition of a fast external to use as the boot disk to then obviate the masking effect of the slow internal.

Realisticly:how much OC with my system?MSI GNB MAX

Ok, How much OC I can get, with my system, if I change the 1.5ghz 266DDR Value RAM to something better. Any suggestions.
I plan to ditch the ram for something better, but my mobo, and CPU aren't that fast compared to the C, and E, and the 64 stuff.
I am using the 2.8B, E7205/i7205 mobo.
Only fan cooling. Using the pipe101, will place the tornado on it. Does the vantec fan card improves my GF performance.
I am just able to OC my card from 350 to 388mhz, 1.09ghz, others got a 420mhz on a supperior system. All using the inno3d 6800gt.. Or I'm looking at an "old" system already.
The OC FSB is just up to 153. I read somewhere that it is useless/not worth to OC this system.
So what do you think?
my system is in the signature

I would not push further than 160 FSB, you can corrupt your disks since PCI /AGP are not locked. Usually PCI frequency above 38 MHZ is not considered safe and 150 FSB corresponds to 37.5 MHZ PCI frequency. I corrupted my 30 GB WD at 160 FSB.
I have GNB Max, P4 3.06HT, 2x 512MB KVR DDR333 (CAS2.5 rated). I oveclocked the system to 150 FSB, P4 is running as 3.45GHz@600FSB (HT is on), with dual channel DDR300 memory (2-3-3-6 timings). System is 100% stable after testing with Linux kernel compile, Prime 95, 3DMark benchmarks. The performance gain in CPU intensive benchmarks is almost the same as increase in FSB frequency, which is 12.5%, since RAM overclocks in sync with CPU.
If you settle at 150 FSB, your DDR266 will be running as DDR300. You can test it with its given SPD values and if not stable you can reduce CAS setting one step, i.e. from CAS2.5 to CAS3. If none of these are possible, you can upgrade with DDR400.
I use Vantec Fan card with my GF4, but it did not help me increase my overclock. However, I removed the fan on my GF4 (heat sink is not removed just the fan) after trying to increase the overclock. Vantec Fan card is much more silent compared to the Thermaltake fan and copper heat sink combo. I still can overclock as before but do not need to put up with the noise of Thermaltake fan.
Hope this helps
My Config:
MSI GNB Max FISR
P4 3.06 HT (SL6PG) (oc 3.45@600)
2X KVR DDR333 CAS2.5 (running as DDR300 2-3-3-6 timings)
Compro Personal Cinema GF4-Ti4200 64MB (oc 285/570)
SB Live!
DLink 802.11b wireless PCI
Seagate 80GB EIDE (Windows XP SP2)
WD 30GB EIDE (Slackware Linux current)
NEC 4X DVDR/RW
Sony 16X DVDROM
etc

How to perform calculations using column data in BI Publisher

Hello guys
I am very new to BIP, and recently I am learning to create new templates using XML files..
I am trying to create a report that has Account Amount, Amount Net Amount, PM_Amount and a New field say "X"
For Account Amount it is what it is, but for Net Amount it is "Account Amount/40%", for PM_Amount it is "Net Amount x (Account Amount/30)" and for field X it is "(Net Amount + PM_Amount)/column A" where column A is another data field in the XML file but it should not be included in the template report..
Could anyone help me with how to perform such kind of calculations in BIP Template builder? In OBIEE, it is very easy that I can just use column formula, but in BIP I still haven't figure out the way yet..
PLease advice
Thanks

Thanks for the reply..
I looked at the link you provided already, what I wanna know is how to exactly apply the expression in my calculation. In other words, I know that Column C = "Column A div Column B", but in BIP form property, how do I actually substitue "column A" with the actual column..
I wish I could post the XML, but it is huge, it contains 6 data sets and more than 100 columns. I only need 15 columns on my template.
On the form property of each measures, in the "advance tab", I see codes like <?accountamount?>. Now I wanna have a new column said "PM_Amt" which should be "(accountamount div %40) x column B". So I just randomly select another column said "payment". I rename it to "PM_AMT" and on its "advanced tab" it is still <?payment?>. So right there, if I wanna replace that code with a new one that does "(accountamount div %40) x column B" calculation, how would I do it? What would be the syntax including how to propertly refer to the right column field as part of the expression?
And do I have to always use xdofx between <>? how would I know?
Please advice if you understood what I am trying to say
Much thanks
Edited by: user7276913 on Sep 14, 2009 11:24 PM

How much performance do I gain by enable MAT

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for