How see the original resolution of an image in Photoshop CC

I need to see the original resolution of a jpg, but when I go to Image size it is in much higher resolution. the jpg is about 600K which makes me suspect it is in 72 dpi, but when I open it in Photoshop CC it is about 23 MB and in 300 dpi. I need to know what the original is, and Image size is where I used to go to find out before I switched to CC. Does anyone know how I can check the original size and resolution?

I mean the size and resolution that the image was in when received it. I
had it as a jpg from my client, and have made no adjustments myself so
far. You are correct that I was just assuming that something must be
wrong. What puzzled me is that when I looked at the info about the
picture by right clicking on it, it was 600K, but when I opened it in
Photoshop it was 23 MB. What is the explanation for that?
2014-11-28 13:58 skrev c.pfaffenbichler:
HOW SEE THE ORIGINAL RESOLUTION OF AN IMAGE IN PHOTOSHOP CC
created by c.pfaffenbichler  in Photoshop General Discussion -
View the full discussion

Similar Messages

  • How do I export jpgs as tifs with the original resolution ?

    Hi,
    I am very new to Lightroom 5 (I only installed it today (on Windows 8.1) :-)) but I have read Victoria Bampton's Quick Start Guide and have read a number of forum posts over the last few weeks to get an idea about how the program generally works.
    I am embarking on a project to scan and archive my family's photos and videos, and I will be using Lightroom to manage the collection.  To start the project, I have just imported over 10,000 digital photos taken by a variety of cameras (36 of them, according to Lightroom !)  over the last 12 years or so into a new Lightroom catalogue.   These are all currently JPEG files, but I want to keep TIFF files in the collection because my research has led me to the conclusion that TIFF is a better long-term archival format.
    I started by doing an Export of a small number of photos to save the .jpg files as .tif files, but when reviewing the results, I noticed that the image's resolution was changed during the export.  For example, one original jpg is only 96ppi but the exported tif is 240ppi.  Another jpg is 180ppi and the tif is 240ppi.  At least, that's what the metadata seems to be telling me (via the Details tab of the Properties dialog in Windows), so I assume it's true...
    I understand that the 240ppi that I am seeing in the .tif file metadata was specified in the Image Sizing section of the Export dialog, so that's not the issue.  
    I would prefer it if the .tif file has the exact same resolution (ppi) as the original .jpg, but I am unable to work out how to do it.   It would be great if the resolution setting in the Export dialog was controlled by the Resize to Fit checkbox, like the other settings in the section, but it doesn't appear to be (it's enabled even if the Resize to Fit checkbox is unticked).
    I then thought about using the Library Filters to filter by the Horizontal Resolution metadata, so that I could select all the photos with the same resolution and export just those with the Resolution setting in the Export dialog set to the right number, and then repeat that process for each different group of original photos with a different resolution.  Unfortunately, I have not been able to work out how to filter by the horizontal resolution metadata field - it doesn't seem to be available in the dropdown list of fields shown when I click on the up-down arrow next to the "Date" or "Camera" (etc.) columns in the Library Filter pane.
    Finally, here's my question (or three):  
    Is there a way to export .jpgs to .tif files while keeping the original resolution ?  
    Alternatively, is there a way to select groups of photos by their horizontal or vertical resolution (so just those photos could be exported in a group with the right resolution specified) ?
    Or is there any other way to do what I want (convert jpg to tif with the same resolution and keeping all the metadata) ?
    Thanks for reading all the way through to the end.
    John.

    These are all currently JPEG files, but I want to keep TIFF files in the collection because my research has led me to the conclusion that TIFF is a better long-term archival format.
    I'm not sure why you say this. In terms of long-term archival format, I think the two are equal, I am not aware of other reasons to do this, and thus in my opinion, the task of globally turning all your JPGs into TIFFs seems unnecessary. You don't gain anything by doing this. But you sure will spend a lot of time and take up a lot of disk space doing this.
    I would prefer it if the .tif file has the exact same resolution (ppi) as the original .jpg, but I am unable to work out how to do it.
    Again, I think you have embarked upon an unnecessary task. The ppi in the file is essentially meaningless. A photo that has (for example) 3000x2000 pixels saved at 240 ppi is the exact same photo as the same photo 3000x2000 saved at 180ppi, not a single pixel has changed. You are placing a meaning and importance to this ppi number that just doesn't exist.
    To answer your questions at the bottom, I would advise you to not do the things you are talking about, it seems to me that you have greatly misunderstood things.

  • How can I change the axis so I could see the four quadrant of my image?

    Hi!
    I Have been graphying a polinomial with the intensity graph, but I couldn't see the four quadrants of my image,I can only see the first one, how could I fixed?

    I no longer have LabVIEW 5.1 so I only attach a code image of my suggestion.
    Front panel:
    (1) Change the offset for x and y axis of the intensity graph to -100.
    (2) Do the same for the x-axis of the waveform graph.
    Block Diagram:
    (1) What is the reason for the second sequence? It seems to just repeat the same code. (I removed it).
    (2) I am currently graphing "W" instead of "I", because "I" only produces noise (probably because my input parameters are way off). I am sure that with better input values, "I" will make a nice graph.
    (3) subtract 100 (the axis offset) from each iteration terminal to get the input variables to go from -100 to 99 (If you want -100 to 100, you need to set the loop count to 201).
    (See attached i
    mages. Let me know if this is clear)
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .
    Attachments:
    FP_2Dpoly.gif ‏49 KB
    BD_2DPoly.gif ‏24 KB

  • HT204003 does the passbook app work on the iPhone4 because I downloaded the apps for it but I continue to see the original screen for the app and I can't find passbook in my settings.

    does the passbook app work on the iPhone4 because I downloaded the apps for it but I continue to see the original screen for the app and I can't find passbook in my settings.

    Some time in the future (Starbucks Tweeted the other day "by the end of the month") the Starbucks app will be Passbook enabled. When that time comes, you will log into the app with your credentials, select your Starbucks card, and you should be given an opportunity to add that card to Passbook at that time. From there, whenever you walk into a Starbucks the alert will be displayed on the lock screen, just slide your finger across the the alert and show your card to pay.
    Now, I have not seen the new app, of course, so I am just speculating based on how the Walgreens, Fandango and Target apps work. Also, I am not sure yet if this will work in any Starbucks, or just the one that you consider your favorite, or primary location. Again, that is just based on how the other apps seem to work. We'll see.

  • How does the original iPad mini perform on iOS 8?

    I have been thinking about getting a new iPad from the iPad 2. I know the original iPad mini and the iPad 2 have similar specs, but the real upgrade I get from it is the wireless technology and the ability to use Handoff. Overall, how does the original iPad mini handle iOS 8? Should I go with that iPad or get the iPad mini 2? I wouldn't get the iPad mini 3 because I don't think Touch ID is necessary for what I want to do on an iPad.
    Overall, I am wondering how iOS 8 performs on the original iPad mini so it can help me choose between the original or the iPad mini 2. Thanks in advance for your input!

    Get the mini 2 when the prices come down. The mini 2 is baically a smaller iPad Air. The improvements over the mini are well worth the money.
    http://www.apple.com/ipad/compare/#comparison-chart

  • How see the company when my phone receive a call with one of my contact ?

    How see the company when my phone receive a call with one of my contact ?

    It's a good idea. Suggest it to Apple here: http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

  • How  do the dynamic state to record image in the cell-phone?

    Excuse me.How do the dynamic state to record image in the cell-phone?Or whether it has the feasibility or not?..Somebody can give me some opinions and data,please.
    Thanks.

    I don't understand very well what you want, but to record and image (get and snapshot) you have to create an Player, realize the player, start it and then get the snapshot. ex:
                player = Manager.createPlayer("capture://video");
                player.realize();           
                VideoControl videoControl = (VideoControl) player.getControl("VideoControl");
                player.start();
                byte[] data = videoControl.getSnapshot(null);
                Image image = Image.createImage(data, 0, data.length);To find out if a device can record images you can use this:
                boolean mmapiAvailable = System.getProperty("microedition.media.version") != null;
                boolean canGetSnapshots = System.getProperty("supports.video.capture") != null;Hope that answer your question.

  • How are the .7z files used and installed for photoshop elements and premier elements?

    How are the .7z files used and installed for photoshop elements and premier elements?

    Hi,
    You can try to extract them to a folder and then try to install using the setup file.
    Or you can try to download the .exe file ( Small File ) for the software you have and then run the .exe file and it will start the installation. Both .exe and .7z file for the application should be in same location.
    Download Photoshop Elements products | 9, 8, 7
    Download Photoshop Elements products | 11, 10
    Download Premiere Elements products | 11, 10
    Download Premiere Elements products | 9
    *** You can either download the .exe file from the above download links or you can also download both .exe (File 2 of 2) and .7z (File 1 of 2) from the above links.

  • How can I insert an image at the original resolution into a PDF using Acrobat Pro XI

    Got an image created in Photoshop at 300DPI 2480 pixels wide by xx high.  Saved as a TIFF.
    When I insert that image in my PDF (A4 210mm x 297mm) using Acrobat Pro XI via "Content Editing->Add Image" it appears smaller than the page width of the PDF, and I must manually resize the inserted image by dragging with my mouse.  
    Documentation says the image is inserted at the original image resolution, but it doesn't seem to be the case.
    Also tried creating another image in Photoshop using 210mm width @ 300 DPI (instead of 2480 pixels @ 300DPI), got the same results.
    Can anyone help?  Cheers.

    You should maybe take a step back. Nobody composes pages in Acrobat.

  • Flash - how is the HD support - and HUGE image resolution question

    Hello Flash Forums,
    It's been a while since I posted, but I would love to get some information from some of the old pros on here as to best practices using flash for large scale environmental displays:
    1. Flash supports High Definition correct? I did a google search, and see that it does - but unsure whether I need a plug-in or it's just a setting? My question is more along the lines of - can the flash animation be highDef, or only the videos it displays?
    2. I am working on a very large (like 40ft tall) environmental graphic, and curious if anyone can tell me how you deal with images at that size? I remember vaugely, that they don't need to be 300dpi, but do i still need to maintain a certain resolution?
    Thanks for any help you can provide~!
    B

    Any limiting factors you'll be dealing with are likely more to do with what will actually be running/playing your Flash content and feeding that to this display. Whoever is responsible for setting up the computer system that displays this could answer that. Find out the resolution of their display set up. It will probably be a projection setup, that shows whatever media at a blown-up size. Ask them if 1080 HD video will work, and if they have used that before, and how did it look, etc.
    If the display ends up having a resolution of something significantly higher than what a graphic designer's "high" resolution monitor is, you don't necessarily have to have your Flash showing at 100% and fill all those pixels. You can have good results creating your Flash at a reasonale width & height, and then scaling that to 150%, 200%, etc.
    Flash has no problems dispalying 1080 HD video, and nothing is needed other than the Flash plugin. There continue to be Flash Player updates for improved video support, so be sure you get the latest version installed on whatever computer is playing this. YouTube started showing full HD size (1080) a while ago, and so you can always refer to that site to see how smooth the videos are.

  • Photos cannot find my the full resolution of my images.

    I create a book in Photos.
    I save, close, power off.
    Next day, the full resolution version of lots of images are apparently missing from the book.
    If I locate the missing image in Photos, export the original, reimport it and place the reimported image on the page, it works.
    How can this be avoided?

    With the volume mounted you can use the demo version of iPhoto Library Manager to rebuild the library and it will make the rebuild library an "managed" library.  However, you must have iPhoto 9.6.1 in order to do so.  If you don't have it you can get it from the App Store by following the instructions in this post:
    Terence Devlin including Apple logo changes for feature 126 Apple image including Apple logo changes for feature 126 Apple image ends here
    Apr 14, 2015 11:21 AM
    Re: Is Iphoto gone ? i want it back!
    in response to Johannes666
    Recommended
    [DocumentBodyStart:d25bf602-029a-4466-b895-2ab6c98bb4c9]
    Go to the App Store and check out the Purchases List. If iPhoto is there then it will be v9.6.1
    If it is there, then drag your existing iPhoto app (not the library, just the app) to the trash
    Install the App from the App Store.
    Sometimes iPhoto is not visible on the Purchases List. it may be hidden. See this article for details on how to unhide it.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4928
    One question often asked: Will I lose my Photos if I reinstall?
    iPhoto the application and the iPhoto Library are two different parts of the iPhoto programme. So, reinstalling the app should not affect the Library. BUT you should always have a back up before doing this kind of work. Always.

  • Does Muse optimize the original file because my images in a slideshow resize after I have used the image more than once.

    iif I import a photo into my website and make it a small size then when I create a slideshow and add that photo from my computer it comes in too small every time. It's as though Muze is optimizing the original photo and that is very frustrating. I have to open that photo in Photoshop and save it again to fix it. Very annoying. Will this be fixed?

    Muse does not touch the original image, but it does maintain an optimized copy of the original. You can verify by locking the original image file to prevent Muse from touching it.
    Muse performs the optimization at export/publish time based on the largest instance of the image in the project. In this case, when you re-import the image, Muse is incorrectly assuming you want the new image at the same size as the first instance that you resized smaller. We'll look at fixing this behavior in the next release, but in the mean time there is a workaround.
    Instead of opening the image in Photoshop and re-saving, which changes the modification date of the image and signals Muse to re-import the image, try double-clicking until the image is selected. The selection handles will be smaller and solid if you have the image selected. The handles will be larger and hollow if a container is selected. Then resize the image to the dimensions you want. Initially, the image will be pixelated because Muse is still using the previously optimized copy. However, if you choose File->Preview Page in Browser, the image will be re-optimized for the new dimensions and you should see a higher resolution version in both the browser and on your page within Muse.
    You can more easily verify the optimization behavior as follows:
    1. Place an image at 25% of its original size.
    2. Select File->Preview Page in Browser, which will optimize the image at the 25% size.
    3. Duplicate the placed image and resize the duplicate to be twice as big (i.e. 50% of the original). Initially, this duplicate will be blurry after the resize.
    4. Select File->Preview Page in Browser, which will re-optimize the image and redraw at the higher resolution.

  • How to maintain high resolution of exported images

    I am working with iphoto 5.0.4. When trying to export (share>export) an image as a 'Full Size' image (3264 x 2448 4.5 MB) to the desktop it appears at that size with 300 dpi resolution. However if I export the same file as 'Scale image as no larger than:' the resolution remains 300 dpi but the size is reduced to 2.4 MB while the dimensions remain the same. And finally if any cropping is performed or if I resize the dimensions of the image, the exported image will reflect the altered size but also the dpi is reduced to 72. What gives? Does that mean that the printed version will only print at 72 dpi? How can I create a smaller size image and still maintain 300 dpi resolution? I thank you in advance for your help.
    iMac   Mac OS X (10.4.5)   iphoto 5.0

    My first thought would be to remove the "Scale all objects ... " vi property.  I have been using LabVIEW for 10+ years, and I always found that function to work very poorly.  I never use it.  At least you could try removing that setting and see if your problem goes away.

  • How desactivate the smooth for jpg,gif images¿?

    Hi
    I need view the images pixelates...no smoothing...
    because in others computers with out Geforce card, show pixelate.
    Driver 4403
    Windows XP
    How desactivate the smooth images¿?...

    Sorry...my english is terrible
    i zoom in the image but the video card smooth the image...and i cant see the real state of the image...if stay pixelate or not...always smooth....how desactivate this option in my video card

  • How see the code of the application

    I would like to know how to see the code generated by APEX since I need to stamp(print) it.
    Thank you

    Hello,
    In FireFox : Right Mouse Click + View Page Source
    In IE: Right Mouse Click + View Source
    (might be a lot of pages though)
    Greetings,
    Roel
    http://roelhartman.blogspot.com/
    You can reward this reply by marking it as either Helpful or Correct ;-)

Maybe you are looking for