How to avoid multiple login option?

When Solution Manager 4.0 is making RFC connection to ECC 6.0 it asks for login to particular user 4 to 5 times (on ECC). How can I avoid this option?
Regards,
Amit

Hi Amit,
normally you have to login ones to the sat. system when you are in a SolMan Transaction eg. SOLAR01 or SOLAR02, as long as you are in the transaction there is no relogin necessary, but if you leaf the transaction and start it again then you have to login again. Also when you are e.g. in STWB_2 there it is quiet normal that you have to login several times to a sat. system, I know this is painfully, therefor I recommend to establish the trusted system rfcs as we provide in SMSY.
Regards,
uDo

Similar Messages

How to avoid multiple LOGIN with same user in database.

Hi All,
Using database triggers how to control multiple logins of a pertiuclar user.
thanks in advance

Don't forget to activate the RESOURCE_LIMIT parameter, which default is FALSE :
alter system set RESOURCE_LIMIT = true;
Laurent, I had a similar problem some time ago : I didn't want to avoid multiple access, but only control who was doing what. That's because moving from Client/Server to Web the TERMINAL column in V$SESSION becomes useless.
I tried your solution, but I had to give up with it, because in my Forms9i application some forms call Reports, which generate a new session.
I decided to use DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO, and this is satisfactory for my requirements, but I'm interested to discover other solutions.
P.S. with my solution I'm able to limit accesses, because in the CLIENT_INFO string I put, among other things, the
application user, so I can control if an user is already connected. The problem is that existing applications have to be modified .....:-(

How to avoid multiple logins to same application

Hi, I am using APEX version 4.2.1.00.08. I have a function for AD LDAP authentication. The authentication scheme has Set Cookie Attributes, Cookie Name SESSION_COOKIE. I have been using this for years on previous versions of APEX. As part of the 4.2 upgrade I would like it if users did not have to log in many times a day to the same application. I email links to the application, but even if they are already logged in, it opens page 101 in a new browser window and requires a second login. The email contains a link like this https://server/apex/f?p=102:2:::NO::P2_RECORDID:200000:/ I have read multiple posts, for example "Access two applications with one log in" and http://apps2fusion.com/at/64-kr/413-maintaining-authentication-between-apex-applications but I am still clueless. If a user has logged in once and has an APEX session, is it possible to click the link in the email without having to log in again to the same application? There is an after submit process Set Username Cookie and Onload Before Header process Get Username Cookie. Do I need Set Session Cookie and Get Session Cookie processes? Thanks for your time.
Peter
FUNCTION used for AUTHENTICATION SCHEME
create or replace function ad_auth(
    p_username        in        varchar2,
    p_password        in        varchar2)
return boolean
is
    l_user            varchar2(256);
    l_ldap_server    varchar2(256)    := 'DC';
    l_domain        varchar2(256)    := 'servers';
    l_ldap_port        number            := 389;
    l_retval        pls_integer;
    l_session        dbms_ldap.session;
    l_cnt            number;
begin
    l_user            := p_username||'@'||l_domain;
    l_session        := dbms_ldap.init( l_ldap_server, l_ldap_port ); -- start session
    l_retval        := dbms_ldap.simple_bind_s( l_session, l_user, p_password ); -- auth as user
    l_retval        := dbms_ldap.unbind_s( l_session ); -- unbind
    return true;
exception when others then
    l_retval := dbms_ldap.unbind_s( l_session );
    return false;
end;

Hi Peter,
I'm not familiar with LDAP but from a security point of view, I think it is wise to force your users to login if you sending them a link to a protected site. Just in case they forward the email or sharing the same computer. Could you post some of the code that you use to produce the email? It maybe that you need to concatenate &SESSION. where the session id would be in the url
Regards,
Alistair

How to avoid multiple login to PKCS11 token

Hello everybody,
I really hope that somebody here can help me, because I'm really
starting to think that I won't be able to solve my problem...
I am developing an application to generate s/mime messages using
SunPKCS11 and bouncycastle mail library. In order to get a Keystore, which I can later use for setting
up a SMIMESignedGenerator object which I'll use to sign my email, I
need to do these steps:
SunPKCS11 pkcs11Provider = new sun.security.pkcs11.SunPKCS11(configStream);
Security.addProvider(pkcs11Provider);
KeyStore smartCardKeyStore = KeyStore.getInstance("PKCS11");
smartCardKeyStore.load (null,pin);//pin is the pin which I got by
VOLUNTARILY prompting for it
Collection altNames=cert.getSubjectAlternativeNames();
Enumeration aliasesEnum = smKeyStore.aliases();
String keyAlias=aliasesEnum.nextElement ()
X509Certificate cert =(X509Certificate) smKeyStore.getCertificate(keyAlias);
List<X509Certificate> certList = new ArrayList<X509Certificate>()
certList.add(cert);
CertStore certsAndcrls = CertStore.getInstance ("Collection",new
CollectionCertStoreParameters
(certList));
SMIMESignedGenerator gen = new SMIMESignedGenerator();
gen.addSigner((PrivateKey) smKeyStore.getKey(keyAlias, null),
(X509Certificate)smKeyStore.getCertificate(keyAlias),
SMIMESignedGenerator.DIGEST_SHA1);
gen.addCertificatesAndCRLs(certsAndcrls);
mm=gen.generate(mbp1, pkcs11Provider.getName());//mm is a mimemultipart object
In this way, I get prompting twice for the pin: once before this code
that I showed to you (which I called pin) and the second time, I get a
prompt from the underlying library, originated by the gen.generate
call.
How could I do to fix all this and prompt only once for the pin (as it's due...)
Please help me!
Thank you very much in advance
Don Vito CF (carry flag ;)

Anybody knows? :( I'm thinking about rewriting the classes which I'm using, but I bet that there should be a better way...

How to avoide multiple duplicate entries in adress book?

How to avoide multiple duplicate entries in adress book? I can add the same contact name and number more than twice and the phone isn't warning me at all!!! I's quite a heck for me.

not possible from inside AB AFAIK. but you can do the following. in finder open the folder /users/username/library/application support/address book/metdata. switch to the list mode and sort by date modified. quicklook the vcards at the top to see which ones they are.

How to avoid multiple copies of data in page refresh

How to avoid multiple copies of data in page refresh

If you are talking about a page with an insert query, ignore the fact that it's a page refresh. It's just another way that someone can insert duplicate records. I like to handle this in my insert query.
insert into thetable
(f1, f2, etc)
select distinct
value1, value2, etc
from some_small_table
where you don't already have that record

How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

Sounds like there might be blanks in the artist name.
For instance "Lou Reed" and "Lou Reed_" will not match.
(Pretend the underscore _ is a blank).
Select all the Lou Reed songs, Get Info, and type "Lou Reed" in the artist field. That should fix it.

How to avoid multiple votings?

Hello All. How can I avoid, that there are multiple votings from one person?

I think there is no option to avoid multiple votings. Adobe has not implemented this funktion.
Formstack is as alternative to Formcentral. The Fieldoption there is called - Unique.
Unique allows you to restrict submissions of the same value in this field. For example, you can allow only one submission for a particular email address or physical address.
That is the option i was looking too.
Formcentral is useless for me in this way.

How to avoid multiple password prompt for intarnet portal

we have developed a intranet portal in Share Point 2013 with multiple site collection. when accessing through IE, Chrome, we can do settings to avoid multiple password prompt by adding the domain name of site in Trusted sites. How we can achieve the same in Safari while accessing through MAC or IPAD

first time when you call the BSP application from the browser (or by double clicking the BSP_APPLICATION link from SAP GUI) you need to pass user credentials. For further windows this will not be required as browser will remember your info.
if you need to <b>somehow</b> avoid this then the only option is to hard code the user id and password in the service in transaction SICF or by passing the same via URL.
Another option is that if you port this application in a SAP portal environment, SSO can be used .
Hope this helps.
Regards
Raja

How to prevent multiple logins by using HttpBindingListener

Hi,
Can anyone tell me how do i actually use session to prevent multiple login from different machine? From my understanding, i need to use HttpBindingListener to valueBound and valueUnbound when user tries to login, but i encounter a problem is my session is always overwritten since i use setAttribute() method in servlet.
For instance i use username(aaa & bbb) to login in two different machine, my login is always overwritten if i use username bbb to login after username aaa. i know it is because setAttribute() method overwrite existing session data, so i would like to know what other method should i use to achieve what i want, tks.

Hi,
This is the logic for session :
Connect to db for verification, once verified, system return a UserBean and this UserBean will be set in ClientSecurityEngine
When this particular user has been successfully verified, a new session will be created
if(success)
    session = request.getSession();
    User user;
    synchronized(session)
    user = (User) session.getAttribute("user");
    if(user == null)
       user = new User(ClientSecurityEngine.getInstance().getUserBean().getUsername());
       session.setAttribute("user", user);
/* User class */
public class User implements HttpSessionBindingListener {
    private static Map<String, HttpSession> logins = Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap<String, HttpSession>());
    private String username;
    public User(String username) {
        this.username = username;
    public String getUsername() {
        return username;
    @Override
    public void valueBound(HttpSessionBindingEvent event) {
        if (logins.containsKey(getUsername())) {
            HttpSession session = logins.remove(getUsername());
            if (session != null) {
                session.invalidate();
            logins.put(getUsername(), event.getSession());
        } else {
            logins.put(getUsername(), event.getSession());
    @Override
    public void valueUnbound(HttpSessionBindingEvent event) {
        logins.remove(getUsername());
}Edited by: EJP on 21/07/2011 14:22: added {noformat}{noformat} tags so we can actually read your code. Please use them.

How to avoid multiple users to access same tcode

Hi all,
Am creating one z tcode to display the material details for the particular reservation number. How can I avoid multiple users to access the same tcode simultaneously. If anybody works over that tcode then no other user should be able to access the same tcode until or unless the first user works over it.
Regards,
Ramya

HI,
you can even use import and export logic and check if user has entered the transaction ..
Regards,
Santosh
Message was edited by:
Santosh Kumar Patha

How to avoid multiple if else using design patterns.

Hi,
Which design patterns is used to avoid lot of if else in our code . Say for example if the user press 1 the out put should be one, if he press 2 it should be two like this upto 10. So we need to include lot of if-else part. How to avoid the multiple if else using design patter for this scenario. I can't find the solution for this problem can you guys help me?.

I'm too lazy to read a whole text book, but the first google link provides a code sample which made me laugh.
http://www.refactoring.com/catalog/replaceConditionalWithPolymorphism.html
double getSpeed() {
    switch (_type) {
      case EUROPEAN:
        return getBaseSpeed();
      case AFRICAN:
        return getBaseSpeed() - getLoadFactor() * _numberOfCoconuts;
      case NORWEGIAN_BLUE:
        return (_isNailed) ? 0 : getBaseSpeed(_voltage);
    throw new RuntimeException ("Should be unreachable");
}My implementation of The Bridge Over The Parrot Shop
package forums;
import java.util.Random;
abstract class Bird {
private static final Random random = new Random();
abstract double getAirSpeed();
public double getBaseSpeed() {
    return randomDouble(18.96);
protected static double randomDouble(double max) {
    return random.nextDouble() * max;
protected static int randomInt(int max) {
    return random.nextInt(max);
class EuropeanSwallow extends Bird {
double getAirSpeed() {
    return getBaseSpeed();
class AfricanSwallow extends Bird {
private int _numberOfCoconuts;
public AfricanSwallow() {
    this(randomInt(4));
public AfricanSwallow(int numberOfCoconuts) {
    _numberOfCoconuts = numberOfCoconuts;
double getAirSpeed() {
    return getBaseSpeed() - getLoadFactor() * _numberOfCoconuts;
public double getLoadFactor() {
    return randomDouble(3.12);
class NorwegianBlue extends Bird {
private boolean _isNailed;
private double _voltage;
public NorwegianBlue() {
    this(randomInt(10)<2, randomDouble(12.0));
public NorwegianBlue(boolean isNailed, double voltage) {
    _isNailed = isNailed;
    _voltage = voltage;
double getAirSpeed() {
    return _isNailed ? 0 : getBaseSpeed(_voltage);
double getBaseSpeed(double voltage) {
    return getBaseSpeed() * (1+(voltage/Math.PI));
public class AirSpeedTest
public static void main(String[] args)
    System.out.println("EUROPEAN: "+new EuropeanSwallow().getAirSpeed());
    System.out.println("AFRICAN: "+new AfricanSwallow().getAirSpeed());
    System.out.println("NORWEGIAN_BLUE: "+new NorwegianBlue().getAirSpeed());
}... and the requisite background for the uninitiated [NORWEGIAN_BLUE|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218] and [EUROPEAN v AFRICAN|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4b4bGAoVR7g].
You have to know these things when you're a King you know.
Cheers. Keith.

Query: how to avoid multiple POs from being combined into delivery

Hi all,
We are working on an enhancement.
The requirement is:
We need to avoid multiple POs from being combined into one delivery.
Any pointers in this regard would be highly appreciated.
regards
Gurpreet

Hi Murali,
I think your suggestion should solve Gurpreets problem.
I have a query here.
In the copy controls VLTA, defines between sales doc to dlivery doc.
Here we want to maintain copy control between purchasing doc to delivery doc.
How do we achive this?
Also in my view we should write a new combination requirement.
Please check if combination requirement 51 can be used?
Regards
Abhishek

How to avoid multiple DataConnections with LCD ES2

Hi, we are just starting using the data connections to connect via a database with LiveCycle Designer. It seems we are missing something important regarding to manipulation of data from the PDF.
At first we have tried to apply a INSERT command to our first table and be able to browse through the items in the database. We are able to browse through the database only before we have inserted something.
If we insert an item and then try to browse through the database with (Next, Previous, Last or First) it will crash and have an error of the following :
(Next, Previous, Last or First) failed. Multiple-step operation generated errors. check each status value [ID:@11]
So then we have decided to create a second data connection which would have each of the column in the database except for the ID which appears to make everything crash.
E.G.: Table_1
DataConnection1 --> ID, Field1, Field2, Field3, Field4 SELECT Command connection
DataConnection2 --> Field1, Field2, Field3, Field4 INSERT Command connection
Seems like we can't have a SELECT and INSERT in the same DataConnection because with those 2 different connections it works fine....
Then we are trying to show multiple data's in a table which is linked with the ID of the Selected ID in DataConnection1.. To show the data is all fine using a 3rd connection for that Table_2, then we are making sure a blank row is always there at the end of the table to be able to add this new entry to the database with a Add button to INSERT into the Table_2... Unfortunately we do not have a 2nd connection to that table because we cannot link those fields with the database for the purpose of a multiple entry view.
We have tried to make a 2nd connection for the purpose of the INSERT but it doesnt work at all.
We are basing ourselves on the sample provided by Stefan Cameron in his blog http://forms.stefcameron.com/2006/12/18/databases-inserting-updating-and-deleting-records/
I am wondering if we are using the right functionalities and if it is the simplest way to work with databases...
If anyone can help, it would be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks in advance!
Mag

Don't forget to activate the RESOURCE_LIMIT parameter, which default is FALSE :
alter system set RESOURCE_LIMIT = true;
Laurent, I had a similar problem some time ago : I didn't want to avoid multiple access, but only control who was doing what. That's because moving from Client/Server to Web the TERMINAL column in V$SESSION becomes useless.
I tried your solution, but I had to give up with it, because in my Forms9i application some forms call Reports, which generate a new session.
I decided to use DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO, and this is satisfactory for my requirements, but I'm interested to discover other solutions.
P.S. with my solution I'm able to limit accesses, because in the CLIENT_INFO string I put, among other things, the
application user, so I can control if an user is already connected. The problem is that existing applications have to be modified .....:-(

How to avoid multiple call to function:

In our datawarehouse we have a huge receipt row table where all metrics ar stored in the local currency. On top over that we have views which calculate metrics to the desired currency.
So basically all views looks like this
select geo_region,
product_group,
customer_group,
metric1 * (select get_exchange_rate(currency_id) from dual) metric1,
metric1 * (select get_exchange_rate(currency_id) from dual) metric2,
metric1 * (select get_exchange_rate(currency_id) from dual) metricx,
group by..
As we have about 20 metrics we notices that the function is called 20 times per row.
Is there really anyway to avoid that? Shouldn't it be it's just the exact same call with the same in-parameters over and over again.
We've tried with local sys_context and the performance is better but the call to the context is still performed 20 times. Any Ideas?

Can you avoid multiple function calls? Maybe, if as in your example all the function calls values are computing the same result. If they operate on different columns then you'll have to perform the function call anyway.
Either way you should be able to eliminate the (near as I can tell) pointless subquery from dual
You might be able to avoid the repeated function calls if the values are always the same. If every computation you could save the function call (and subquery!) by doing it once and then using assignments after the initial query using variables after the initial query, perhaps using NULL in the query as placeholders to select into a record - something like
select inital_region,
         product_group,
         customer_group,
         metric1 * exchange_rate(currency_id) metric1,
         null metric2,
v_metric2 := metric1;
...Message was edited by (fixed typo):
riedelme

How to avoid multiple login option?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for