How to avoid water damage when installing invisible shield

Just wondering what you have to do to avoid water damage when installing Zagg invisible shield? What precautions should I take so that I do not damage the iPhone when installing Zagg Invisible shield?
Thanks and I look forward to your replies.
...B

Hi BGmail,
I would stay away from invisible shield by zagg or similar products. I tried it, waste of £15, could have got myself a dock stand for my phone for that ****!! The problem with IS(invisible shield) is that the screen protector has a rubber feel which makes it annoying when swiping your finger on it + it's not scratch proof at all!! Mine scratched 2 days after the installation so badly that I had to remove it. The back it's hard to apply, does not cover everything you'd like to, also a dust trap that could get between tha film and the phone causing it to scratch, some people reporting the film going yellow after a while(on white iPhones).
What I think of IS: A poor american product heavily/aggressive advertised!! Mine is off, using a hard clear plastic shell and a good screen protector, might look bulky but it's safe, only using the shell while at work, the iPhone is pretty tough, don't forget.
Your choice... Good luck !!

Similar Messages

  • How to avoid launching Labview when invoking VI by Teststand

    Hi, friends.
    I'm a learner of teststand. I wrote some VIs by Labview. Now I want to invoke them in teststand environment. But when I run the sequence. Labview will be automatically launched. How to avoid launching Labview when I run the sequence?
    Thanks.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I'm not sure that I follow what you are saying..  But it sounds like when the VI is called, the LabVIEW development software is started and you want to avoid that.
    If you create an executable or dll and call that from within TestStand, it should not call the development environment.  You would need to have the LabVIEW run-time engine installed on the target PC. 
    It has been many years since I've used TestStand with LV, so my memory may not be accurate.  I think the above had worked for me.  However, it seems that I recall something about having the LV code in debug mode causing it to open the development environment.... but it's a distant memory.    You're not using breakpoints where the LV VI is being called, are you?
    R

  • How to avoid the dialogue when converting from context menu

    This is a follow-up to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2016146#443364 which was locked due to a bug.
    i would like to know how i can avoid the 'save as' dialogue when using the context menu to convert a word file to pdf using windows XP/acrobat 8/word 2007.
    so far, it always prompts me for the filename, which is annoying as it does not allow me to batch-convert several files and let the thing run its course.
    the solution provided by Steve in the other thread does not work - even if the plugin from word does not propt for a filename, it still does when triggered from explorer/context menu.
    so back to square one: how to avoid that dialogue when not opening word at all?
    cheers, thanks for any help. michael

    For a permanent change, START>PRINTERS>right click on Adobe PDF printer and select properties>General>Printing Preferences>Adobe PDF Settings. Under the settings tab, uncheck the box related to asking for a name. Pretty sure that is the location, but it may vary with version.

  • How to avoid data repetation when using select statements with innerjoin

    how to avoid data repetation when using select statements with innerjoin.
    thanks in advance,
    satheesh

    you can use a query like this...
      SELECT DISTINCT
             frg~prc_group1                  "Product Group 1
             frg~prc_group2                  "Product Group 2
             frg~prc_group3                  "Product Group 3
             frg~prc_group4                  "Product Group 4
             frg~prc_group5                  "Product Group 5
             prc~product_id                  "Product ID
             txt~short_text                  "Product Description
    UP TO 10 ROWS
    INTO TABLE l_i_data
    FROM
    Joining CRMM_PR_SALESG and
    COMM_PR_FRG_ROD
    crmm_pr_salesg AS frg
    INNER JOIN comm_pr_frg_rod AS prd
    ON frgfrg_guid = prdfragment_guid
    Joining COMM_PRODUCT and
    COMM_PR_FRG_ROD
    INNER JOIN comm_product AS prc
    ON prdproduct_guid = prcproduct_guid
    Joining COMM_PRSHTEXT and
    COMM_PR_FRG_ROD
    INNER JOIN comm_prshtext AS txt
    ON prdproduct_guid = txtproduct_guid
    WHERE frg~prc_group1 IN r_zprc_group1
       AND frg~prc_group2 IN r_zprc_group2
       AND frg~prc_group3 IN r_zprc_group3
       AND frg~prc_group4 IN r_zprc_group4
       AND frg~prc_group5 IN r_zprc_group5.
    reward it it helps
    Edited by: Apan Kumar Motilal on Jun 24, 2008 1:57 PM

  • Rotation of Apps... IF ONLY  & Avoiding water damage with InvisibleShied

    Okay I thought I would hit two birds with one stone here..
    I wish... that when you hold the phone in landscape or portrait mode the apps would rotate too to face the right way. Then people could use there phones any direction they wanted at any time.
    That would be awesome...
    Apple would please a lot of people with such an update.
    It makes so much sence to do this too.. after all it can already do both modes so why not incorporate it into the actual menu?
    Please do this apple it would be awesome.. I know people have done this through jail breaking but Im not a fan of jail breaking because for one it voids your warrenty and 2 the apps you get for three arent properly tested and could cause security issues with your phone..
    I dont wany my 599 pound phone out of warrenty.
    Ive just ordered an Invisible Shield since ive read there the best protection for your phones screen and back but on the instructional videos ive watched and the information provided on forums and website got me thinking about the dangers of using the spray or squiggy when applying the protector to the phone..
    You put the liquid onto the protector and not the phone and avoid all the ports when you use the card to push out the bubbles and excess liquid.
    But couldnt the liquid cause water damage to your iPhone and void the warrenty..
    I know there is more than 1 indicator on the iphone and if they all turn pink then they void your warrenty.
    So is this shield really safe?
    Is it worth it?

    First off, I want to say that the Invisible Shield is not exactly invisible! Don't get me wrong, it's a great product and they have shown it helps reduce damaged from dropping. But it has a slight orange peel texture to it and it does take some getting use to it. It specifically states in the instructions to spray the liquid on the shield material and to squeegee away from speakers and ports. It also says to have a cloth to dab up any water after you put the material on. I have put many of these shields on and have never had a problem with the liquid detectors. I have also found that after you apply the film if you put your phone under your leg (when you are sitting) for a length of time, the heat from your body helps the material set and all the small bubbles will disappear easily.
    The other option, the one I opt for, is the anti-glare shield. It is not quite as indestructible as the the Invisible Shield but it also protects the screen from most damage. While it will reduce the quality of the retina display it really reduces the reflections off the screen and after a short period you won't even know it's there. I also have really oily skin and this gets rid of a majority of the greasy marks from your face and fingers!

  • How to avoid safety warning when opening a pdf from an link in another pdf?

    I make pdf in Acrobat with links to other pdf files av have made. When i try to click a link to open the pdf, i get the safety question if trust it or if i will block it. How to avoid that question all the time?

    Hello Kvalitetetsansvarlig
    Try adding the PDF to the trust location in Acrobat
    Edit -> Preferences-> Security (Enhanced), Click on "Add File", and browse to your file.
    Click on "OK" button and check.
    Regards,
    Deepak

  • Apple genius employee claims laptop is water damaged when no water sensors have even been activated

    Track pad is being temperamental one minute it is working, next it is clicking all over the place. So I took it to apple store today to see if they could find out what was wrong. Apple claim that it has been water damaged (coke or something spilt on it) impossible and refuse to fix it even though no water sensors have been activited. there was a tiny bit of sticky substance on the battery and around the sticker for the battery. When they then took out the battery they tried to say that one of the connectors for the track pad with the screws had been in contact with water even though it appeared to be just dirt. Has anyone had any experience with anything like this before? or what should i do?

    If you can take to another Apple store and get their opinion, or the same store when other techs are working.  See if others have the same opinion.  Also ask to see the store manager.

  • How to avoid clear record when tab pages changes

    Hi All
    I am using oracle forms 10g and db 10g.
    I have created a form with four tab pages. Namely "EXPENSE" , "AMOUNT_DETAILS", "SUPPLIER" , "ACCOUNT".
    When i enter a data in page 1 ie Expense and move to next page page2 "AMOUNT_DETAILS", and enters data in page3 "SUPPLIER" and when i come back to page1 "EXPENSE" and also Page2 "AMOUNT" the data get cleared in Tab pages. There is no data again i need to enter the data manually.
    Can any one suggest me how to avoid this clear data.
    Thanks & Regards
    Srikkanth

    Hi,
    Thanks once again for your quick response.
    I have checked it , i was working with oracle apps.Now i have entered all the datas in the four tab and press save button in the screen at that time also the data get cleared.Can you please tell is there any work around for this.
    regards
    Srikkanth

  • How to avoid shared locks when validating foreign keys?

    I have a table with a FK and I want to update a row in that table without being blocked by another transaction which is updating the parent row at the same time. Here is an example:
    CREATE TABLE dbo.ParentTable
    PARENT_ID int NOT NULL,
    VALUE varchar(128) NULL,
    CONSTRAINT PK_ParentTable PRIMARY KEY (PARENT_ID)
    GO
    CREATE TABLE dbo.ChildTable
    CHILD_ID int NOT NULL,
    PARENT_ID INT NULL,
    VALUE varchar(128) NULL,
    CONSTRAINT PK_ChildTable PRIMARY KEY (CHILD_ID),
    CONSTRAINT FK_ChildTable__ParentTable FOREIGN KEY (PARENT_ID)
    REFERENCES dbo.ParentTable (PARENT_ID)
    GO
    INSERT INTO ParentTable(PARENT_ID, VALUE)
    VALUES (1, 'Some value');
    INSERT INTO ChildTable(CHILD_ID, PARENT_ID, VALUE)
    VALUES (1, 1, 'Some value');
    GO
    Now I have 2 transactions running at the same time:
    The first transaction:
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;BEGIN TRAN
    UPDATE ParentTable
    SET VALUE = 'Test'
    WHERE PARENT_ID = 1;
    The second transaction:
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;BEGIN TRAN
    UPDATE ChildTable
    SET VALUE = 'Test',
    PARENT_ID = 1
    WHERE CHILD_ID = 1;
    If 'UPDATE ParentTable' statement runs a bit earlier, then 'UPDATE ChildTable' statement is blocked untill the first transaction is committed or rollbacked. It happens because SQL Server acquires shared locks when validating foreign keys, even
    if the transaction is using read uncommitted, read committed snapshot (read committed using row versioning) or snapshot isolation level. I cannot see why change in the ParentTable.VALUE should prevent me from updating ChildTable. Please note that ParentTable.PARENT_ID
    is not changed by the first transaction, which means that from FK's point of view whatevere is set to the ParentTable.VALUE is never a problem for referential integrity. So, such blocking behavior seems to me not logical. Furthermore, it contradicts to the
    MSDN:
    Transactions running at the READ UNCOMMITTED level do not issue shared locks to prevent other transactions from modifying data read by the current transaction. READ UNCOMMITTED transactions are also not blocked by exclusive locks that would prevent the
    current transaction from reading rows that have been modified but not committed by other transactions. 
    Does anybody know how to workaround the issue? In other words, are there any tricks to avoid shared locks when validating foreign keys? (Disabling FK is not an option.) Thank you.
    Alexey

    If you change the primary key of the parent table to be nonclustered, there is no blocking.
    Indeed, when I update ParentTable.VALUE, then:
    in case of PK_ParentTable is clustered, a particular row in the clustered index is locked (request_mode:X, resource_type: KEY)
    in case of PK_ParentTable is non-clustered, a particular physical row in the heap is locked (request_mode:X, resource_type: RID).
    and when I update ChildTable.PARENT_ID, then:
    in case of PK_ParentTable is clustered, this index is used to verify referential integrity:
    in case of PK_ParentTable is non-clustered, again this index is used to verify referential integrity, but this time it is not locked:
    It is important to note that in both cases SQL Server acquires shared locks when validating foreign keys. The principal difference is that in case of clustered PK_ParentTable the request is blocked, while for non-clustered index it is granted.
    Thank you, Erland for the idea and explanations.
    The only thing that upsets me is that this solution cannot be applied, because I don't want to convert PK_ParentTable from clustered to non-clustered just to avoid blocking issues. It is a pity that SQL Server is not smart enough to realize that:
    ParentTable.PARENT_ID is not changed and, as a result, should not be locked
    ChildTable.PARENT_ID is not actually changed either (old value in my example is 1 and the new value is also 1) and, as a result, there is no need at all for validating the foreign key.
    In fact, the problem I described is just a tip of the iceberg. The real challenge is that I have deadlocks because of the FK validation. In reality, the first transaction has an additional statement which updates ChildTable:
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;
    BEGIN TRAN
    UPDATE ParentTable
    SET VALUE = 'Test'
    WHERE PARENT_ID = 1;
    UPDATE ChildTable
    SET VALUE = 'Test'
    WHERE PARENT_ID = 1;
    The result is famous message:
    Msg 1205, Level 13, State 51, Line xx
    Transaction (Process ID xx) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
    I know that if I change the order of the two statements, it will solve the deadlock issue. But let's imagine I cannot do it. What are the other options?
    Alexey

  • How to avoid system slow when login first time  everyday

    if login system first time every day, it will be very slow for loading web application.
    I think maybe it 's  reload cache every night or by a certain perods of time.
    how to avoid this situation. or set cache reload a time per week?
    Thanks.

    Terry,
    I would confirm your application pools are set up as suggested in the install documentation.  This should resolve your issue.
    Thanks,
    Drew

  • How to avoid the prompt when verifing signature?

    I sign the doc with my cert.
    The cert is not trusted by Acrobat/Reader itself so when i try to verify the signature Acrobat/Reader will prompt the user cert is not trusted.
    My question is how to avoid this prompt through Acrobat SDK or how to add my cert to trusted cert list through Acrobat SDK?
    Thanks.

    Patrick Leckey wrote:
     You will also see the BER Decoding error when you have a self-signed peer-to-peer cert in your Windows Cert Store, even if it is not the signature you are using to sign.
    Start > Run > certmgr.msc
    Look for any certs that have "peer-to-peer" in the Intended Purpose column
    Remove that cert
    Restart Acrobat
    Give that a shot.
    Patrick,I have not found the Intended purpose of cert names "peer-to-peer".
    But I have just found the cert which will cause the signature failure.
    The key is the cert can not be removed.
    I'm very curious that why a cert has no relationship with the signature could cause the signature failure?
    Is it a BUG of Acrobat/Adobe Reader?
    If not how can i operate successfully?
    Thanks.

  • How to avoid opening photos when connecting a camera

    how can I avoid opening photos when connecting a camera?

    Connect the Camera.
    Launch Image Capture (in the Applications Folder)
    You can set what happens when you connect this device in the lower left of the Image Capture window.

  • Avoid undeploy/deploy when installing Updates?

    Hello Community,
    when our BO environment was first set up (years ago) the option "Install Tomcat application server and automatically deploy web applications and services to it" was checked. So the bundled Tomcat was installed and everything will be automatically deployed.
    This means with every update web applications get undeployed and then deployed. When installing several Service Packs and Patches in a row this takes so much time..
    Is there a way to stop auto undeploy/deply and do it manually after all updates finished? I am looking for a configfile like wdeploy.conf or something else.
    Regards,
    Michael

    Hi Sid,
    for example you have to install several updates on your production system in a row:
    - 4.1 SP4 Platform update
    - 4.1 SP4 Explorer update
    - DS 1.3 SP1 update
    - 4.1 SP4 Patch 1 Platform update
    - 4.1 SP4 Patch 1 Explorer update
    with every update/patch the installer undeploys the old web apps and deploys the new ones, but as we install all updates/patches in a row this effort is only needed one time!
    This is also mentioned here: BI Suite Performance - Business Intelligence (BusinessObjects) - SCN Wiki
    Install the BI Platform without automatically deploying the web
    applications. This will then avoid the step 'undeploy web applications'
    which is taken by 'patch' updates during a software update. This step
    can be taken manually or via script after the update process. This can
    save considerable time.
    So this is why i am asking if it is possible to change this behaviour within a configuration file or something? Because when we first installed our platform we set it to automatically deploy.
    Regards,
    Michael

  • How does the Water damage repair work in canada Quebec?

    Hi guys, some months ago my Ipod touch 32g (fourth generation) fell on the toilet seat, and it got water damaged, its dead and passed out. I took a rendez-vous at the nearest apple store near my house for sathurday so i fix it, but I want to know what will they tell me, what is the price, and is there any other way repairing it. Also, its been more than 1 year ive bought my ipod touch so the warranty of 1 year is over. Also, some friend of mine told me that apple waranty says it is 1 year, but it is 2 years, and it was recently sued because of it, I would like to know if it was a myth or it was truth, because if it is true, my warranty might not be over. Thank you for responding to the thread.

    http://support.apple.com/kb/index?page=servicefaq&geo=United_States&product=ipod
    All quoted prices are in Canadian dollars and do not include any applicable taxes or 10.77 CAD for shipping if you arrange service online or by calling Apple Technical Support. Your AASP may charge you a diagnostic fee whether or not repairs are made.

  • How to avoid further damaging my antenna strip

    I already asked for help for removing a mark the bumper made on the antenna strip and the only responses I got were for things I had already tried. Now I am asking if anyone knows what I could possibly do to avoid this getting worse, or happening more. I can't see what caused the mark, as there was no grit inside the bumper. I am hesitant to put the phone back in that bumper or even another. Please, please help me.

    The bumper is supposed to be like a case, but it caused the mark, so I don't see how a different case would keep this from happening again. I think that Apple would just tell me I am being picky about the mark if I took it in. Last year, that is what they told me when I had a bright yellow screen. Well, I guess the phone will remain in the box. What a waste, but I am afraid of further damage to it. Well, I have been having people tell me I made a stupid purchase and I guess they are correct. Thanks anyway. Any other suggestions are welcome.

Maybe you are looking for