How to block all goods movements incurs to a warehouse?

Hi all,
I am wondering if you can provide me a way, a transaction code on how to perform the following?
How to block all goods movements incurs to a warehouse.
I am trying to execute LX23 (Stock comparison IM/WM) and try to remove the differences using batch input file.
SAP document indicates the prerequisite to use this feature is that all inventory movements to the warehouse be blocked before clearing the differences (i.e. adapt the IM figure to that of WM figure).
Appreciates.
Daniel

I think the requirement here is to block inventory movement (GR, GI, PCN etc.) to storage locations which are connected to your warehouse. Blocking movement on storage types in your warehouse does not serve this purpose.
Is it really necessary to block inventory movement when running LX2? LX23 eventually will need to correct the stock via IM posting at the end.
Anyway, if storage location level authorisation check is not currently in use in your system (OLMB -> Authorisation Management -> Authorisation check on storage location), you may try to activate authorisation check on storage locations connected to your warehouse so that those who has no M_MSEG_LGO assigned won't be able to post inventory movement to the warehouse.

Similar Messages

  • Restrict all goods movements for materials untill the latest costing run ex

    Hi dudes,
    1 here i have a requirement that i need to restrict all goods movements in the month for all materials(SFG,FG) untill the latest costing run(standard cost estimate) on 1st of each month.
    2. Can we restrict the status of process order in such a way that Conformation can be done only after the goods issues against production order. The goods receipt can be done only after the conformation of the process order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Robert.

    Robert,
    Procedurally you can block, by not opening the current period, before the costing run is completed, just when you wanted to release the cost estimate, at that time you can lock all users and then open the next period and then release your cost estimate and then unlock all the users. You need to work with your Basis/MM/FICO guys to have this procedure implemented.
    On the GI Check before confirmation and Confirmation check before GR, you can use Confirmation and GR releated User exits to check. There are many posts on this topic, a simple search on this forum would take you to the thread.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Block all logistics movement for the plant

    Dear Experts ,
    I want to block all sort of logistics movents & transactions entirely for a site .
    How can i do this ?
    My this requirement is for a specific period ( 2 days )
    Pls suggest on the same
    Regards
    Anis

    The answer as above is more of crude method it will work, but in Production environment or Quality environment it is strictly not recommended.
    You can do transaction code MI01, before that you can get all material relevant to that plant through MM60 transaction code.
    Posting block due to physical inventory
    Indicates that no goods movements involving the materials listed in the physical inventory document can be posted for the duration of a physical inventory count.
    Use
    The indicator is set for the affected stocks in each case (storage location stock, batch stock, or special stock) for all associated stock types and is not cancelled until the count results are posted.
    The indicator remains in the physical document header even if the stock is unblocked through the posting of inventory differences. It then only indicates that a posting block was set for the documents.
    The blocking indicator can be set in one of two ways:
    Directly upon entry of the physical inventory document (if the count is to take place immediately)
    Shortly before the count (if the count is to take place later)
    You can set the indicator by choosing Physical inventory document -> Change in the header data of the physical inventory document or via batch input.

  • Default or fixed Batch number in all goods movement???

    Hi Experts,
    Expecting to through light on the below and provide a solution.
    We have requirement that for a material a default batch to be created as 000
    and assigned . The same should flow automatically in all the Business
    Transactions Like Production Order , Goods Issue, Goods Receipt , Sloc
    Transfer etc.
    Can anyone suggest the batches created for a material in Tcode : MSC1N only
    to be allowed in any goods movement transaction.
    One requirement Pl. except the Feild exit any other suggestions.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards ,

    HI,
    check the spro settings at Logistic General ---> Batch Management ---> Define Batch creation for goods movement,  here you remove automaic batch creation and select proper manual assignment that suits to your requirement. If is manual only tnen yoy can assign your own batch,

  • Confirmation of Production Order without all Goods Movements

    Hello experts!
    I've tried to do a confirmation of one material that had only one level BOM with one material, but, when I try to do the Goods Movement in CO15, only the component appears. To another materials the goods movements was done for the two materials.
    I've changed routing, BOM, material record... but I didn't have success.
    Any ideas?
    Regards,
    Rodrigo.

    Dear
    You might have kept Backflashing Indicator -1 in MRP2 view  and while doing CO15-In goods movement tab -You will find BOM compoenets with movement type -261 .But your requirement is to carry out the Auto GR-101 while confirmation posting .
    Please do the following :
    1.Goto -OPJK-Define Production Scheduling Profile -Here for that scheuling profile which have been assinged in Work Scheduling view -Mark the Auto GR active .
    2.In the routing  or in the Production Order -Operation Overview screen -Goto Operation Details -Slect the last operation -Assing the Operation Control Key which has Auto GR active like SAP Stanrda PP03 .Please check in OPJ8-Slect the Operation Control key -Hit the details information -Check the Auto GR Marked .Based on this while you will do CO15 , GR-101 (MIGO-101) will happen .
    Hope it helps
    Regards
    JH

  • How to block  an Goods Receipt...for a PO not invoiced yet.

    Dear friends ,
    We have one new situation for one specific foreign vendor where we need to block the goods receipt  if no Invoice Receipt is done yet.
    we know that is possible to block invoice receipt without the GR...but we need exactly the inverse of this... block the GR while the IR is not posted..
    any help will be appreciated.
    Alessandro

    Dear Allessandro,
    There are several ways to meet your scneario.
    1. Goto ME22n and lock the line items in the PO which you o not want to receive, system will not allow to post GR untill this is unlocked. This is manual process.
    2. Go to MK05, enter the Vendor number and purchase organization. Press enter
       Under the block  for quality reasons select option 3 . This will block the system to place any further quotatoin requests, Purchase Orders and Goods receipts to be done on that particular vendor.
    Hope any of the above options will help resolve your problem
    Thanks
    Murtuza

  • Ultimate HD - How to Get ALL Remaining Movie Channels?

    I just got Ultimate HD. I used to have an old Extreme HD package with the "HBO Cinemax Showtime Starz Ent Pk" add-on for $36. When the upgrade was installed I lost my movie channels, except for those included in Ultimate HD (Showtime, TMC, and EPIX).
    Does anyone know how to get the remaining movie channels (HBO, Cinemax, Starz, Encore) added? The web only offers HBO, Cinemax, or an HBO/Cinemax combo. Starz and Encore aren't offered as an option and neither is the entertainment pack I had before. I've called into customer support and they were only able to offer packages similar to the web.
    Any suggestions? Thanks!

    crbascott wrote:
    I just got Ultimate HD. I used to have an old Extreme HD package with the "HBO Cinemax Showtime Starz Ent Pk" add-on for $36. When the upgrade was installed I lost my movie channels, except for those included in Ultimate HD (Showtime, TMC, and EPIX).
    Does anyone know how to get the remaining movie channels (HBO, Cinemax, Starz, Encore) added? The web only offers HBO, Cinemax, or an HBO/Cinemax combo. Starz and Encore aren't offered as an option and neither is the entertainment pack I had before. I've called into customer support and they were only able to offer packages similar to the web.
    Any suggestions? Thanks!
    The other packages are available.   You sure you don't see them as upgrade options when your on the login to my verizon on the  web?  You actually can also order them through the stb, although I don't know anyone who tried that. 

  • How to block all authomatic updates of firefox itself and plugins and also requests to update??

    I would like to have a stable browser with the extensions I selected. I like Firefox for being highly customizable and for a huge choice of extensions written by volunteers not working for Mozilla.
    Since none of support seems to be able to understand the problem (or is instructed not to understand), I feel that I need precede my request by an explanation, which is inevitably fairly long. I need to explain why the standard suggestions by support are not acceptable.
    Unfortunately, every new version of Mozilla made the visual customization of the GUI (i.e. a complete theme; probably, they were called skins before) used by me not working. The versions 18 and higher are compatible with only one (complete) theme suitable for me. For me, you reduced the choice to just two options: the default GUI, which I personally cannot stand at all, and one more. And the second one may disappear at any time. I was under impression that the people at Mozilla do understand that different people may have different tastes (and that this is good), in contrast with the people at Google who are, apparently, do not. It turned out that I was wrong.
    Still, it was possible to check the option "do not install upgrades" and keep the version you liked. Then Mozilla changed this and the updates started to be installed without consent of the user. This is something far beyond my comprehension. The option "do not install" turned into an outright deception. I doubt that this is legal even if this is hidden in the small print somewhere.
    The Mozilla support was not helpful at all with this type of problems and took a cavalier approach to all who asked: “We know better what you need”. Fortunately, somebody posted a solution, or, rather, a hack allowing to get rid of automatic upgrades. Note that this hack is for moderately advanced users only, and, being a hack, it may not work with future versions.
    More or less simultaneously the problem with plug-ins appeared. The first major sign was the impossibility to watch the YouTube videos. The other plug-ins followed. Now I am unable to open without a hassle a PDF document downloaded even from a government site, not to say about reputable libraries (and the files were created by libraries themselves by scanning, or by Google), or files created by my friends whom I definitely trust much more than Mozilla.
    Again, Mozilla support is of no help at all. Moreover, they post derogatory remarks about users complaining about these issues and trying to intimidate them. The support may go as far as to suggest upgrading Firefox to version 23 as a solution to the problem of keeping version 3 without constant hassles. This is an insult. Moreover, when I posted a couple of remarks in the thread https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/971139#answer-498622, the thread was almost immediately closed by Tylerdowner, top 10 contributor, administrator, moderator. This is a serious abuse, but the buttons to report this disappeared. How he got his titles? This guy is guilty of abuse and should be banned from all forums.
    Dear Tylerdowner, the-edmeister and others. Please, try to understand a couple of basic ideas.
    First, my computer is my computer, and you have absolutely no right to change it without my consent. I will take of its security myself. The owners of other computers will take care of their security themselves. There are a lot of tools dealing with security; and I don’t know anybody without at least one. This is the first basic principle.
    The second idea has nothing to do with my privacy and Mozilla’s invasion of my privacy. It is not hard to realize that Mozilla is not the only software I am using, and even not the only browser. You do not control the rest. No matter what you do, the computer may be infected in other ways. If your browser is not allowing me to watch a video, I copy-paste the URL in another one and watch it there, and this is not the only other way to watch it. Even if your concerns about the security are sincere (I don’t believe that they are; they are too mechanical and repetitive), blocking something in Mozilla is futile. The result of your behavior will be the abandonment of Mozilla by more and more users, the process already going on.
    Finally, here are my requests.
    1. I and other users need a simple extension for Firefox written by Mozilla (not by
    volunteers) and allowing to disable all updates in one-two clicks and disable all monitoring of plug-ins and anything else which may be present in the user’s computer. Of course, there should be an option to reenable these features. It should be a couple of buttons in the Options window, or in a separate pop-up window and have simple GUI. Of course, it should work as described, which is not the case for the Options window now. No hacks, no changes in about:config, no renaming or moving of files, etc. I appreciate everybody who made such suggestions. One of them allowed me to get rid of updates without my consent. It remains to see if the suggestion in the mentioned thread can solve my problem with plug-ins; as of now, it works for me only partially. But such thing should be done by Mozilla.
    2. It would be great if the software engineers at Mozilla will learn (relearn?) the concept of the backward compatibility. More specifically, the Mozilla should prepare every new release or update in such a way that all (I mean this literally, all) extensions and themes posted on the Mozilla site will be still working after the update. The volunteers don’t have time to keep up with the constant updates, and many authors of very good extensions already stopped to support them.
    3. Do not release a new version if you are not sure that it is bugs-free. Then there will be no need in updates between the versions (by a version I mean Firefox numbered by an integer without dots). Perhaps, this is incompatible with the current release schedule. The abandoning of this crazy schedule is the easiest thing to do; only a desire to do this is needed.

    Dear feer56,
    First, I have to repeat: every new Firefox version was not compatible with many old themes. I do realize that I am, probably, especially unlucky – my favorite theme was always disabled. Still, it is not an accident that Mozilla tried to eliminate the complete themes completely and replace them by some pictures: the list of themes turned into a cemetery of not compatible themes. I just checked: out of 496 complete themes no more than 40 are compatible with Firefox 22. I don’t have any newer version.
    Please, do not attribute to me the idea of including all the themes into the basic browser download. I did not suggest anything like this. I suggested caring about the backward compatibility.
    Of course, I followed your steps 1-5 quite a while ago. But in Summer of 2012 Mozilla started to ignore these preferences. Firefox downloaded new version in the background, and next time you open the browser, it upgrades itself before you even realize what is going on. There was no way to interrupt this process. Even if firefox.exe was terminated through the tasks manager in Windows, it first completed the update, and only then closed.
    I never saw any step by step instructions to deal with this problem. I just searched the Mozilla site for “disable automatic updates, and the first two pages of results deal with <b>enabling</b> updates. Eventually, one gets to disabling at https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/966835?esab=a&s=disable+automathic+updates&r=18&as=s . One of the top 10 contributors suggests switching to Firefox for IT professionals, and then deal with this problem only once a year. Or to follow steps 1-5 above. In the case it will not work, he suggests looking at an irrelevant article. He should know and I am sure that he knows that the problem is not with not saving preferences by a mistake; the problem is that Firefox ignores them now by design. Eventually this was admitted by somebody.
    Changing about:config is not an easy task. The meaning of most entries is unclear, the modifications suggested by somebody turned out to be not sufficient. This is also a task for IT professionals.
    I said nothing about the competence of Tyler. He is arrogant; this is a completely different matter. He may use his competence at some place where he will not need to interact with customers.
    “If you do not like what Mozilla is doing and rather be tracked and rather be followed, please use Google Chrome. We're all here to help you.”
    Do you mean that it is better to be tracked by Mozilla than by Google? As I learned yesterday, Firefox compares daily the software installed on my computer with a blacklist on Mozilla servers. This is tracking. And there is option to opt-out, there is not even a warning.
    If you care about your customer not being followed, include an option blocking the Google-analytics into the browser itself. Irrespectively of privacy, Google-analytics prevents many pages from loading completely: it takes too long to perform all these Google-zero-by-zero pixel dances.
    Then you say that the volunteers working on the core code deserve much more respect than volunteers working on extensions. I am not sure that this is the case. I don’t see that the core is noticeably better than for other browsers. The fact that Mozilla wasn’t able to solve during 10 years the main problem of Firefox, namely the buffer overflow, and then stopped even to acknowledge its existence, is very disappointing. In contrast, a lot of extension is very useful.
    I know about the testing process only what Mozilla tells to the public. And Mozilla tries to blame the short period between the releases for new bugs introduced in each new release.
    What was your idea in suggesting me to read that article? Do you think that it contains some valid excuse to the lie in the Options window, for example?
    But the article is useful, thanks. It tells me that there is no hope here and I should look for another browser. In the meantime I should block Firefox from accessing the Mozilla site completely. It looks like very soon I indeed will be an IT professional.
    I have absolutely no interest in mobile devices and don’t see how they could be useful for me. And no matter what the projects are, the market share of Firefox is going down.
    Best wishes.

  • MIRO - How to block all invoices from a certain vendor?

    Hi,
    I would like to block alll invoices from a certain vendor. In XK02 (change vendor) --> company code data --> payment transactions, I have tried a A and a * and a M in the field 'Payment Block', but it doens't make any difference.
    If I receive an invoice via MIRO with regards to a goods receipt it will never block the invoice if the IR = GR. The purpose is that for certain vendors invoices will always be blocked so that the procurement has to release this via MRBR.
    Any idea how to obtain this?
    Thanks a lot,
    Peter

    Dear Peter,
    I  would do the following to solve your requirement:
    Create Z-table ZVENDOR_BLOCK  with one field of type LIFNR. There I would maintain every supplier which you want his invoices to be blocked.
    Then I would customize a new Reason for Blocking invoice: (example: "X: Vendor Invoice Blocked by Default")
    Then I would implement BADI MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS   and there put the logic to determine if the particular invoice should be blocked.
    example code:
    --- fill all export-parameter always start with this -
      e_zfbdt = i_rbkpv-zfbdt.
      e_zbd1t = i_rbkpv-zbd1t.
      e_zbd1p = i_rbkpv-zbd1p.
      e_zbd2t = i_rbkpv-zbd2t.
      e_zbd2p = i_rbkpv-zbd2p.
      e_zbd3t = i_rbkpv-zbd3t.
      e_zlspr = i_rbkpv-zlspr. "Bloqueo de Factura
    data: v_lifnr type lifnr.
    select single lifnr
            into v_lifnr
            from ZVENDOR_BLOCK
            where lifnr eq i_rbkpv-lifnr.
          if sy-subrc = 0.
             e_zlspr = 'X'.
           endif.
    Best Regards,
    SL

  • How To Block 501 & 511 Movement in SAP

    Hi,
    I Want to Block Movemnt 501 and 511 for Every User for Two Days.
    How can I do this ? Please share your valuable reply.

    Hi,
    Under movement type config (Transaction OMJJ) ,  select "movement type" > Enter required movement type> click on "Allowed transactions" and delete which transaction from the list. so that movement type will not work for that transaction.
    Regards
    Dheeraj

  • How to block the goods receipt of items mentioned in the PO

    hi gurus,
    My functional people requirement is, when he created a purchase Order of 1000 quantity and I have also done GR for 860 quantity against this PO. he wont be receiving remaining 140 quantity. So in order to avaid that he have checked del completed indicator in PO. But still this PO is allowing me to do GR of the remaining quantity. He got some functional help but he dont want to do taht thing. My question is how should I block the receipt of that quantity which I do not want to receive.
    he want me to write exit or badi. so Is there is any EXit or badi to do that
    PS: I do not want to change the PO quantity.

    change like this .. dup will get avoided
    if required do message handling
      CALL FUNCTION 'ME_EKPO_SINGLE_READ'
        EXPORTING
          pi_ebeln                  = is_mseg-ebeln
          pi_ebelp                  = is_mseg-ebelp
    *   PI_BYPASSING_BUFFER       =
    *   PI_REFRESH_BUFFER         =
       IMPORTING
         po_ekpo                   = ls_ekpo
    EXCEPTIONS
       NO_RECORDS_FOUND          = 1
       OTHERS                    = 2
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
        CHECK ls_ekpo-elikz = 'X'.
        CONCATENATE 'Delivery Already Completed for' 'Line item:' is_mseg-ebelp '-' 'Material:' is_mseg-matnr INTO message_var.
        MESSAGE e002(sy) WITH message_var.
      ENDIF.
    About the St22 analysis i dont have much idea .. i think so roll back is happening.
    May be others can help you regarding this.Try to post it as a new thread so that you will get better answers

  • How to block all AIM text messages to cell phone

    Hi folks,
    I was woken up by an AIM text message (obviously spam) on my phone around 6:30am this morning. I received two more text spam between 6:30am and 7:15am until I put my phone into "Standalone mode" so I could go back to sleep. Each text message was from a different 6-digit phone number or 6-digit code, so blocking one number would not help. When I got out of bed and turned my phone back on, I was still receiving more AIM text messages (also obviously spam) to check out a certain URL.
    I have an older prepaid plan. So when I log into My Verizon and look for the spam controls, I don't have any.
    I found a way to turn off ALL AIM text messages. I found this site:
    http://www.aim.com/products/txt#im-to-mobile
    Under
    Manage Your Mobile Privacy
    It has a link called:
    Block texts if you are not an AIM user
    http://www.aim.com/products/txt#block-txt
    You enter your cell phone number into this page, you get a confirmation number via text message on your cell phone, you enter this 4-digit confirmation number (located at the end of the text message) into this web page, and click "Disable Messages". It says:
    Pressing this button will disable all text messages coming from AOL® and AIM® Services to your phone.
    Once you click that button, a little pop-up window will appear that says:
    The page at aolmobile.aol.com says:
    SMS to your device successfully blocked.
    with an OK button.
    I hope it works! It looks like it will work for all cell phones, not just Verizon. So far my phone has been quiet for the past hour and 15 minutes, I am not getting any more AIM text messages....

    There is no know issue like this; have you installed any Preware apps? Have you tried restarting your device from Device Info, Reset Options, and Restart? I would try this first; but you may have to go the next step and Erase Apps & Data. This would delete all PIM data and apps off you device, and then you would have to reload from your backup data. This however will also delete all text messages on the device, and there is no way to restore them. The last step would be to run webOS doctor on the device to restore or repair the operating system. You can get this application from www.palm.com/rom, enter your serial number and follow the steps on this web page.

  • How to correct this goods movement?

    user wrongly put our own stock back to consignment stock, and the IOs are closed which means we can't use MBST to cancel the material. what can we make the adjustment? please kindly reply if you know.

    Hi Nancy,
              Try this option.
    Do the transfer post ( MB1B)
                           Move ment type 411,special stock K.
    Move the stock consignment to U.R
    Cheers

  • Create a subsequent Goods Movement for a transfer posting

    Hi Team,
    I have a scenario where the users will create a Good Movement document for transfer posting. The Stock of Material "A" is transferred to stock of Material "B" using the movement types 561 etc. Now the quantity is reduced from unrestricted stock of "A" and posted to "Stock in Transfer/Transit" of "B". The requirement is to create another Goods Movement document immediately after the above transfer posting is completed and use movement type 101 to post the same quantity to unrestricted of "B".
    I tried searching for use exits and could not find a relevant one "After Save" for goods movement online transaction. I found the MB_GOODS_MOVEMENT_UPDATE Badi but don't know how to create another goods movement document while in the update task. I'm concerned that if I call a BAPI or BDC inside the update task, it might conflict with the current transaction (transfer posting). Looking for your guidance.

    Hi Deepali,
    You can use the userexit ' ZXMCBU02 '  to write your own code. This user exit gets triggered for almost all the goods movement transaction.
    There is also a very similar BADI which you can use which gets triggered for every goods movement transaction.
    I would like to know the BADI feel free to let me know. I think the above user exit should server your purpose.
    Hope this is useful for you.
    Cheers
    VJ

  • Error message (M3024) during parallel goods movement

    For publication distribution, collected unreferenced deliveries and goods issues are done in SAP system for a customer group by a program which is triggered by a web service every day. Standart SAP functionalities are used in this program. At goods issue part of program, an error message is occuring "Valuation data for material &  is locked by the user &" with error code :M3024. The user who processes the program is locking himself. Also we have checked the other goods movement types in standart transactions (MB1B-MB11..)and same problem was occured. We have checked the notes that we applied before for to avoid material lock in paralel goods movement. There is nothing changed both in customizing and deveploment after upgrade. So we couldnt find the way to fix this problem. FIRST ANSWER FROM SAP***************************************** Can you kindly review the attached note 70865 with regards to this issue. WE APPLIED.-- We reviewed 70865 and this solution not applicable for our current system. According to note; We set material late lock exclusive time 15 seconds in OMJI. This solution solved material lock error at all plant level. After this solution, We get same batch error during goods movement(m3862), Then We applied note 157423, this note solved material batch lock error during goods movement, At last we have now m3024(Material valuation error lock) error during all goods movement. THEN********************************* As explained in the note 70865 , to ensure data integrity, it is necessary to block the material against updates by other users during good movements. This is achieved by blocking the material plant (lock object MARC) and the material valuation area (lock object MBEW) exclusively against othertransactions which update the material master. What you can do, as advised in the note, is to activate the late block via transaction OMJI. As a result of this change, several users will be able to carry out good movements to the same material and plant simultaneously. The problem is that you will experience a disadvantage of performance loss after this change. Please, notice that with this change in OMJI, several users will be ableto carry out GOODS MOVEMENTS to the same material and plant simultaneously. This change will not allow the simultaneous input of a goods movement and an invoice for the same material (in this case, the material will be locked as soon as the purchase order item is adopted in the invoice and the error message M3024 will occur). When the error message M3024 occurs, you could check with transaction SM12, there you could find some tables like MBEW are locked by user. The table is locked to prevent valuation, quantity etc. to be updated. System does not check if it is standard price or MAP, as soon as you work with one material it will be locked (its valuation data has to be locked, because otherwise there is no guarantee of the consistency of the stock values. Without this lock mechanism the possibility of serious data inconsistencies could arise). your customizing under: SPRO > IMG > Material Management > Set up Material block for goods movements Here you could choose setting 2(at positing) to have only a short locking period at posting. Please review information in attached notes. 521945 FAQ: Material block 322989 Late block: Number of blocking attempts AT LAST ** PROBLEM STILL GOING ON WHAT SHOULD WE DO TO SOLVE THIS ERROR.

    HI Fatih,
    Refer to SAP Note 1744780 - Error message M3024 during Invoice Verification process .
    In the standard system it is not possible the simultaneous entry of a GOODS MOVEMENTS and an INVOICE for the same material and the same plant.
    When you enter the invoice for the purchase order item, the valuation data for the material is updated, therefore this valuation data (table MBEW) needs to be blocked so that it is not changed at the same time by any other transaction (which might cause inconsistencies).
    Resolution
    This system behavior can not be avoided by any customizing setting or any user exit.
    This is correct system behavior to protect the other transactions update the material master.
    As advised in the note 70865 :
    It is possible to activate the late block via transaction OMJI. As a result of this change, several users will be able to carry out good movements to the same material and plant simultaneously, however there is a risk to cause the data inconsistency and performance problems.

Maybe you are looking for