How to control ship-complete in STO process

Hi Experts,
The issue as follows and it is urgent.How can we convay the suplying plant to ship completely at PO Level.user don't want partial delevey in STO process.
how to ship all together in the STO process. I am going to place a purchase order in the system. In my understanding, system creates delivery automatically partially if there is some items are in stock NOT all together. However, this time the purchase order has to be shipped all together because it will go to the customer directly without unpacking when it is arrived in warehouse.
Thank you very much in advance.
-Chitti
9930154536

Hi Amit,
Thank you very much for your quick response.
i have tried this also. while doing delevery(VL10B) it is accepting partial delevery in background and in purchase order at delevery tab-> delevery completed indicator getting active.No further deleveryies allowed.
Hence it is not convaying the requirement.
please suggest if any solution.
Thanks&Regards,
Chitti
9930154536

Similar Messages

How to control sequence of Function Modules processed in update task?

Hello,
I've some questions regarding following process that needs to be extended: a Function Module (FM) 'Save' calls several other FM e.g. 'X1' and 'X2' in update task. Those update modules are independent from each other and write data to the database that finalize the save process.
Now a third FM 'X3' needs to be called in update task. This one is also independent from 'X1' and 'X2' but it calls a further FM 'X4' in background task as separate unit which starts a job. This job requires the data from FM 'X1' and 'X2' already persistent on the database. By the way: the FM 'X3' triggers the Access Control Engine (ACE) notification that calculates the authorization data in the mentioned job. Therefore this process needs to be the last FM call in update task in the queue of calls in FM 'Save'.
Questions:
(1) Is it possible to control the process sequence of the FM 'in update task' simply by the sequence they are called in FM 'Save'.
(2) Presumed that all FM beside 'X3' have processing type "Update with immediate start" or "Immediate start, no restart" (in short V1) would it be another solution to specify FM 'X3' with type 'Delayed' to control the process sequence? When a delayed FM will be processed?
(3) Is it uncritical to call in FM 'X3' (already running in update task) the FM 'X4' with addition in background task as separate unit that furthermore starts a job by an event? I'm afraid that this nesting could lead to unexpected errors.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Best regards,
Oliver

ya it will this be in the same sequence only...........
Regards
Anbu

How to assign shipping point for STO

Hi experts
for STO, PO=>Delivery
When creating PO, enter material master then press enter, client want to proposal shipping point automatically
for example, when create PO, enter material master, if the material master MRP2 view storage location is 1130, then proposal shipping point 7000 after press enter
Is SAP stardard function can do this?

Hi,
If your configuration is proper in IMG, then shipping tab will reflect in P.O
And for your speciefict requirement activate shipping point determination on the basis of storage location
IMG >> Materials Mang. >> Purchasing >> Purchase order >> Set up stock transport order >> set up stock transport between storage location >> set up storage location dependend shipping point determination
Here u can carry 2 activities
In this define rule as Strorage location speciefic shiping point detemination for delivery type
and next step assign shipping point according to storage location
kapil

How to control the triggering of BTE Process 1110

Hi experts,
I recently worked with BTE process 1110 i.e. for Duplicate invoice check. Using this I made a custom error and warning message.
But every time the user hits ENTER in FV60, this BTE FM gets triggered. Seeing the same warning again and again on the screen is very annoying for the user.
Is there a way to control the triggering of this BTE FM. It should not come more than once.
Please note that I have used Pop up message box to show the warning messages using POPUP_WITH_TABLE FM.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Arash

Or if you want to make sure this check is made before save and only once, then throw the pop up with warning and set a global field in the function group. The next time before throwing the warning check if the global field is set and if set bypass the warning.
Just a thought based on when you want the warning.
Vikram.M

How to control to complete maintenance order ?

Hi Experts,
i want to control maitenance order ( generated from prventive maintenance ) activities should not be performed before its due to date. in case of 100 days cycle period maintenance plan and 95% call horizon, system has generated maintenance order five days before as per standard. i want to keep a control that system should not allow to perform any activity on this order till we reach 100th day.
Kindly suggest the wayout.
Regards,
Murthy.

Dear krishna murthy
You can restrict the order release unless & untill the execution date has been reached. This you can code using user -exit at the time of order release/save. Prevention of Release of order can restrict printing of order & in result you can prevent pprocessing of order till the actual planned date.
Regards
Makarand Gurjar

Freight capitalization for STO process using shipment cost document

Dear MM experts
I have been testing and trying to charge freight to material using transportation module. I know how to do it in simple STO process without SCD (shipment cost document) but I am not able to do it with SCD.
I have searched and tried every link I found on SCN. Unfortunately there are many open threads and non of them is answered or giving complete solution. For example I have tried this link where Ajit Kumar has explained the scenario in detail I am but unable to achieve my result. I have also tried other links and SAP note 427944 as well.
Now what thing confusing me is accounting entries and documents/steps where these accounting entries will be posted.
My current process is like this in plant to plant transfer under same company code
STO > OBD > Shipment Document > PGI > Accouting Entry with 641 movement type. Material account debit and same account credit. > Shipment Cost document > GR with 101 without any accounting entry > Transfer freight cost to FI using Freight Service PO determination > Accounting Entry Freight Outward Expense Debit and Freight Clearing Account Credit > MIRO > Accounting Entry Freight Clearing Debit and Vendor Credit
As you can see we are booking freight as an expense and not charging to material. Now what I want is that freight should be charged to material. If I am sending material from plant P000 to plant P201 under same comapny code then freight charges should be added in material cost in plant P201.
I have done FRB1 condition type with accrual and copy shipment cost tick mark and other stuff suggested in all those threads but it is not working.
My requirement is to understand the points where and what accounting entries will be created as per my new scenario which is same as old one except one difference which is to charge freight to material instead of booking expense in freight service PO.
Lets take an example that material cost price is 100 and freight charges is 50. Now as per old threads at the time of GR against OBD system will create accounting document with 150 debiting the stock in plant P201. What about credit? If we have added freight here then what about 2nd accounting entry in my first scenario in which freight expense is debited and clearing account is credited? Could anyone please explain accounting entries and points where these entries will be posted?
Another thing is that is it only possible with moving average price to charge freight to material or can we do this with standard price as well using some standard or customized solution?
Detailed and easy to understand answer will be highly appreciated.
Thank$

Hi Moazzam ;
Firstly, you can benefit Badi/s in package VTRA which is given belowed.
Secondly , i think that shipping method --> create sto with delivery --> create shipment document and shipment cost document (problem is starting so system will be create PO and service entry sheet automatically , can you try shipment document is non-related with cost document.
Thirdly , you can post invoices charge to material with miro , if you success to direct freight costs to stock account (BSX).
Also , you can benefit doc. sap behaviours for Std price/ Map --> Planned & unplanned delivery costs in mm
I hope , you can manage your process ; for me standart way is the best.
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal

In STO Process How can i Change the shipping point manually

Hi,
I need clarification in STO process, shipping point determined automatically based on ovl2 setting like Shipping condition from customer master loading group from material master plant in the line item.(here the shipping point is1000.)
In my scenario it picking correctly shipping point(1000) even i have maintained manually shipping point(1200) in ovl2 but when i am creating STO document UB change shipping point at item level in shipping tab system allowing the manual shipping point (1200) but when i enter or save the document system overwrite 1200 to 1000,system consider only automatic determination in shipping point (1000)
Can you please help why i am not able to change the manually shipping point 1200( even i maintained in ovl2 manually shipping point 1200)

Sending a calendar to another country is not supported in many jurisdictions - as it can lead to extra charges for the receiver. As I have no idea what country you are in you can select your country from this list
http://store.apple.com/us/help/print_products/routing
And find out if it's supported in your country and to your chosen destination.
Regards
TD

STO Process Copy control settings

Dear Gurus,
I am having issues with item number in purchase order and delivery document. I require the same item numbers in purchase order to be copied to delivery document. I think i got to do something with copy control settings. Please help me. I am confused since its an STO process.
Thanks in advance

Hi George,
Here customization can be done as follows:
Step 1: SPRO --> MM --> Purchasing --> PO --> Set up STO
In this step the customer number and sales area is assigned to Supplying & Delivering plants.
Step 2: SPRO --> Logistics Execution --> Shipping --> Delivery --> Copy control --> Specify Copy control for Deliveries
Check the settings made for DL to NL (STO) and DL to NLCC (Cross company) copy control settings.
Step 3: T.Code OVLK
The Delivery document types NL and NLCC needs to be assigned with "B" in the order required field. Thus, the system understands the data for delivery document has to be copied from Purchase order.
Thanks & Regards,
Sharan

STO - How to control Over delivery ?

Dear All,
In STO Scenario, how to control the over delivery?
Please note that I have already assigned a tolerance % in my Purchase Value key & same has been assinged to my material.
Now when I create a STO for this material system is picking up this Overtolerance percentage. But Still If I create a delivery more than the PO Qty (which exceeds the tolerance %). System is allowing to save the delivery.
Hence plz suggest how to restrict the same.
Please note that I am selecting the Partially Delivery indicator in STO as A - Create a delivery with qty. greater than zero Since tolerance wont work if I select Partially delivery allowed.
Hope it is clear.
Thanks & Regards,

From OSS note 548914 Over/underdelivry tolerances for GR/GI for stock transp.ord.
R E L E A S E < 4.70
Stock transport orders without SD processing / delivery (for example movement type 351 for the goods issue, Transaction MB1B, MB11):
During the creation of goods issues for stock transport orders the system does NOT include overdelivery tolerances (T156F-FELDM = DM07M-UETMG) maintained in the purchase order item. The system checks only against the quantity ordered during which the system may display message M7022, which can be customized. This is valid for both stock transfers within a company code and for cross-company-code stock transfers.
Stock transport orders with SD processing / delivery (for example movement type 641 for the goods issue, SD Transactions VL02, VL10):
If these are stock transport orders with SD processing, the system neither checksduring the goods receipt nor during the goods issue against the quantity ordered + overdelivery tolerance.
R E L E A S E >= 4.70
As of Release 470 there is, if required, a check against underdelivery tolerances (Field V_T161W-TOLKZ) during the goods issue for the stock transport order. Otherwise the checks are as described for the earlier releases. Customizing: IMG => Materials Management => Purchasing => Purchase Order => ..underdelivery tolerances

How to fix this error "this iPad is not able to complete the activation process. Please press Home and start over. If the issue persists, please visit your nearest Apple Store or Authorized service provider for more information or replacement"?

How to fix this error "this iPad is not able to complete the activation process. Please press Home and start over. If the issue persists, please visit your nearest Apple Store or Authorized service provider for more information or replacement"? When I plugged in my iPad this popped up!

Hi csreddy,
If you are receiving a message to contact an Apple Retail Store or Authorized Service Provider for help updating from iOS 3, click on the link below to initiate that support:
Update the iOS software on your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch - Apple Support
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204204
Update your device using iTunes
If you can’t update wirelessly, or if you want to update with iTunes, follow these steps:
Install the latest version of iTunes on your computer.
Plug in your device to your computer.
In iTunes, select your device.
In the Summary pane, click Check for Update.
Click Download and Update.
If you don't have enough free space to update using iTunes, you'll need to delete content manually from your device.
Find out what to do if you get other error messages while updating your device.
Last Modified: Jan 12, 2015
Apple - Find Locations
https://locate.apple.com
Contact Apple for support and service - Apple Support
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201232
Regards,
- Judy

How to control the processing of the request?

I have something like this:
<h:inputText value="#{sessionController.currentRowData.settlementId}"/>
<h:inputText value="#{sessionController.currentRowData.remark}"/>
<h:inputText value="#{sessionController.currentRowData.fromDate}">
<f:convertDateTime pattern="yyyy-MM-dd"/>
</h:inputText>
The currentRowData object is the currently selected row of a data model.
Problem is, the model is updated with the value of the components whenever the form is submitted,
and regardless of whether the value of the components has changed or not.
(Actually, the behaviour depends on the type of the property, as ie. Date is treated differently from String or int.)
This causes unwanted changes to the model, and, if a new row is selected, it will at once
be updated with the values of the previous row (from the current state of the components).
I want the above components to update the model only if the user wants to, ie. only if a
specific command button is pressed.
How to control this?
Let a PhaseListener check the request, and do renderResponse on the FacesContext if
the "selectRow" request is found in the request parameter map?
This is not very elegant, and it does not seem to work either. If setting PhaseId to APPLY_REQUEST_VALUES, the action itself (selecting row)
will not be executed, and if using UPDATE_MODEL_VALUES, the value of the components is set from the request (even if unchanged), and not updated according the the new data in the model (the rendered values does not reflect the values of the properties of the object the components are bound to)
Another solution might be to let the "disabled"-attribute of the inputText tags be dependent on whether
a specific "edit"-button has been pressed (disabled inputText tags are rendered correctly after a row change).
But a better solution would to have the ability to control the behaviour, something like
"for these components, no updating of state should be done unless the condition c is true"
(I'm not sure what condition this could be, though).
Whatever solution I may end up with, the real problem seems to be that the state (and hence the model)
is updated from the request also in the case where the value in the request is the same as the current value of the component.
Or maybe there is something I have missed here?
erik

This one is a tricky problem - a side-effect of JSF doing a lot of things automatically is that sometimes it does too much.
I don't have a great solution, but here's a couple of ideas:
(1) Try using multiple <h:form>s on your page (not nested one inside the other, but separate). Data will only get updated in the form that contains the button that got pressed.
(2) Use an intermediate model layer, and discard updates as appropriate.
Neither of these are beautiful solutions - the second is way ugly - but they might help. Long-range, I'd love to see something like "subforms" supported in JSF that can provide finer grained control over what gets processed (validations, model pushes, etc.) and what doesn't without resorting to the blunt hammer of multiple HTML forms.
I'm a little confused about "the model is updated with the value of the components whenever the form is submitted, and regardless of whether the value of the components has changed or not.", because JSF is checking the old value and using ".equals()" to see if its changed. Note, however, that it's not caching the old value across the request, but simply going back to the model on the subsequent request, which may (or may not) explain the behavior you're seeing.
-- Adam Winer (EG member)

STO- How to control Over delivery with batch split?

Dear All,
In STO Scenario, how to control the over delivery?
I created a PO for the Intra Company stock transfer & Delivery created in the Background with the T Code VL10B. When I am doing picking using T code VL02N, the system is allowing to add more than PO Quantity in batches and system displaying the warning message (Specified quantity is greater than the open quantity/Message no. VL287) & allowing to save the deliver document..
Hence plz suggest how to restrict the same.
Hope it is clear.
Thanks & Regards
varun

I am also in the same boat.
I searched the forum and got the link STO - How to control Over delivery ?
I checked OSS notes 548914, 386340,215488 but to no avail.
I suggested user exit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in include MV50AFZ1 to my technical team for finding the resolution. So far it is still on hold.
If you come across any other solution, you can update the forum so that it would be helpful for many others.
Regards,

Every app install results in the "waiting" mode on my home screen. How can I complete the install process?

Every attempted app installation results in the "waiting" mode icon on my home screen. How can I complete the install process? What am I missing?

Hi,
1) Forget downloading the application from the device, and instead download it through iTunes and sync to transfer the application to your iPhone / iPad.
2) Other way is: Go to Application Settings> Store and tap above the Apple ID to sign out. Restart your iPhone / iPad, go back to Settings> Store and sign. Tap the icon that was waiting to update the application.

How to control two different processes with one DAQ output board

Hi! I posted this in the Signal Generators forum, but I'm reposting here in case someone on this board has suggestions for a way to get around my problem programmatically (ie. within LabVIEW). Thank you for any help you can provide.
Patrick
I have a PXI-6722 8-channel, 13-bit analog output board, and with this I want to independently control both the temperature (thermometer excitation/heater control) and magnetic field in my experiment. Unfortunately, it appears that I cannot do both simultaneously, which is totally unacceptable for my application.
Currently I'm using separate VI's for field and temperature control. This is the start of the problem, because in DAQmx you can't have 2 output tasks on the same card at the same time. In order to remedy this situation, I used MAX to create a global task containing all 8 13-bit analog outputs. However, it now appears that each time I do a write operation on this task (from whichever VI) I must write to all of the task channels, rather than just the channels I want to change. This would be fine for the temperature controls as they are of the type "set an output voltage value and hold it until told differently," so I could re-write the currently held values for channels that are not being changed. Magnetic field control will not work in this way, because we need to do very smooth field sweeps which require an analog waveform to be sent and sampled at a high rate (so that the steps are as small as possible). So if, for example, a thermometer's excitation voltage or a heater's power need to be changed during a field sweep (as is often necessary to maintain a constant temperature, via PID), then the sweep will be disrupted, potentially causing a dangerous magnet quench.
Does anyone have any ideas on how I could make this work? It seems very wasteful to buy a second output board when I still have lots of free channels on the first.
Thanks,
Patrick

I'd probably create a third process that just updates all output values on the card whenever necessary.
One way is to send messages via queues from the temperature and magnetic field control routines to the third process. The third process doesn't do anything unless it gets a message from one of the two other processes. The message should contain the channel task ID to change along with the new value. Use the LabVIEW queue VI's, using a type definition to specify the message type either when you create the queue or use the variant VI's. Once it gets a message, it updates the changed channels, not modifying the others (use a shift register to store an array with the current set of output values).
Hope this helps.
Jason

How to avoide the control recipe creation step and control recipe complete

Hi
in process order procedure has configured in our syayrm ...like
orde creation,release,control recipe created at time orede release, then order conformation ,order inal conformation, control recipe comlete , order TECH., ...Like ths our order process configured..
here we not useing any control recipe functions ... and control recipr complte ...so how to remove this step from order process...pls could any one guide inthis issue.
Rgards
HGVD

Dear HGVD,
Assuming there is only one order type(process order type) is used in both the manufacturing plants,then create plant specific
production scheduling profile in CORY,for the plant 2000,assign the prod.schd.profile with the default order type and
do not include the check box for generate control recipe and save the data,but in the same CORY,assign the same order
type,with including the check box for generate control recipe.
Check by this way and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

How to control ship-complete in STO process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for