How to define complex reconciliation rule

i have to do reconciliation with some complex rule but if i see reconciliation rule we can only define simple rule like userid = samAccountName. Please suggest how we can define complex rule.
thanks in adv.

http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14049_01/doc.9101/e14061/busrule.htm#BIBJEFCG

Similar Messages

How to define the copy rules in master contract

Hi,
Could you please help me on how to define the copy rule in master contract . I cann't find the link,it's not under IMG/SD/sales/contract/master contract/define referencing prodecures.
Thanks/Cindy

Hi Sai,
I'm afraid VTAA may not resolve my problem. What I want is to define the copy rule. When you go into IMG/SD/sales/contracts/master contract/define referencing requirments/define reference procedure you will find there is a copy rule in field area. What I really want is to define that copy rule.
Thanks

How to define Template Selection Rules according to doc language code

hi All,
I am using ucm10g, I need to use DC to convert word to html, by defining Template Selection Rules, it worked perfect.
Question is I have to use different template for different content that use different languages, for example, if a content has a primary file writing in English, that content will be checked in with langCode attribute of "en", and according to this langCode attribute, I will use different template that will show "nextpage" or "previouspage" according to langCode field, other content will use other template that show "nextpage" or "previouspage" in other language.
I donot think the fields used in Template Selection Rules(such as author, type, profile) in ucm10g can be used in this case, any suggestion?
Best regards

I will ask easier.
is it possible to set in RSCUR -> Exchange rate type 'Y' and Exchange rate from InfoObject '0EXRATE_ACC' AND use it in BEx?
If yes, how, if now why?
Thank you
Standa

How to define complex type with table per record?

Hi,
for one of my tasks I'm dealing with XML export. After short investigation of the postings in the forum I found an acceptable solution:
Re: Convert ABAP to XML and Vice versa
The issue is that I need an XML file like this:
<plant>
<material>
    <purchases>data</purchases>
    <purchases>data</purchases>
    <purchases>data</purchases>
    <sales>data</sales>
    <sales>data</sales>
    <sales>data</sales>
</material>
<next material>
</next material>
</plant>
So here are the questions:
1. Is it possible (and how) to define such deep structured type where for each record (means material) there is at least 1 internal table connected to that record? That would let me use a record-2-DOM conversion and a standard DOM-2-XML renderer.
2. Could anyone please provide a very simple and short example?
Of course, I could write my own XML renderer and achieve what I need (without using DOM, simply write to file all the desired XML tags while looping at my *nested* tables), but if there is a way to define such a structured type and further to fill it with data, it would help me learn a little bit more about abap opportunities and would save me a bit more time to create a renderer.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ivaylo Mutafchiev

Hi,
You can declare deep structure as below
TYPES : BEGIN OF ty_address,
          house(10) TYPE c,
          street(10) TYPE c,
        END OF ty_address.
TYPES : BEGIN OF ty_itab,
         name(10) TYPE c,
         age      TYPE i,
         address TYPE ty_address OCCURS 0,
        END OF ty_itab.
DATA : i_address TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ty_address,
       i_itab    TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ty_itab.
DATA : wa_address TYPE ty_address,
       wa_itab TYPE ty_itab.
CLEAR : wa_address,
         wa_itab.
wa_address-house = 'House1'.
wa_address-street = 'Street1'.
APPEND wa_address TO i_address.
wa_address-house = 'House2'.
wa_address-street = 'Street2'.
APPEND wa_address TO i_address.
wa_itab-name = 'Test'.
wa_itab-age = 10.
wa_itab-address[] = i_address[].
APPEND wa_itab TO i_itab.
Also check structure BSPL_GRID_FIELDCAT field CELL_COLOR

How to Define new Date rules

Hi ,
I have a requirement in my project, where in i have to create some new date rules. I've searched the whole web to find any document which explains the XML for Date rules but couldn't find any. Does any one know what that XML means, and how to create new Date rules ?
Please reply
Krishna-

Hi
it just calculates new dates base on reference dates or abap function modules.
In IMG in Date management node you can create your own date rules.
Best would be to copy existing one and than modify it.
Please read this thread about this: Date rules editor - file format documentation availability
Regards
Radek

How to Define Multiple Notification Rules for Different E-Mail Channels?

In C4C we can define a notification rule for New tickets, for example, that provides an acknowledgement of receiving the customer's e-mail.
This works great for a single support team, but what if we have multiple support teams, each with their own e-mail address, and each with unique requirements for their auto-acknowledgement?
When setting up a new notification rule, there doesn't appear to be any option to define the e-mail channel, service and support team value, or a "from" e-mail address.
We're on-boarding over a dozen e-mail teams, and I'd hate to tell them that they'll all have to share one auto-acknowledgement template from a single do-not-reply address.
Does anyone know if this is possible to:
Define the e-mail channel or service and support team as an condition in the notification rules.
Define the outgoing "from" e-mail address for a notification rule.
Thanks for any insight the community might have!
Mike
T-Mobile USA

Hi Mike,
As of release 1402, your analysis is correct. The out-of-the-box notification rules do not include the "incoming email channel" as one of fields on which to build condition, and all notifications are sent from a common do-not-reply address.
You can easily overcome the first limitation by using the SDK. For example, when the ticket is created you could set an extension field based on the email channel, and then use the extension field to define different notification rules, using different templates. All extension fields are automatically available to be used as conditions.
Thank you for your feedback and for bringing this item to our attention. We will definitely keep this in mind as we plan for future releases.
Kind regards,
Gabriele Bodda
Product Management

Dvt:Graph How to define own Style Rule Bundle

Hi,
I need help in defining style rule bundle in the backing bean to be used in the styleRuleBundle tag of dvt:graph
say for example I nee need to define the follwing rule...
All data value points below 50 should display in green
from 50-80 it should be yellow and 80-100 must be red in colour...
regards

Add to your resource bundle:
af_dvt_hv.fetchingData=Your textDario

How to define an aggregation rule for a dimension based on bridge table?

Hello,
I need a solution for aggregating data correctly when using a dimension based on a set of dimensione tables containing a bridge table. Please find below a description of my business case and the OBIEE model which I’ve created thus far.
Business Case
The company involved wants to report on the number of support cases, the different types of actions that were taken and the people involved in those actions. One support case will undergo a number of actions (called ‘handelingen’) until it is closed. For each action at least one person is involved performing a specific role, but there can also be multiple persons involved with 1 action, each performing a different role for that action. This is the N : N part of the model.
The problem that I face is visible in the two pictures below:
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k24/The_Dutchman_2006/OBIEE/sample.png
As long as I don’t include anything from the Dimension Meelezer in my report, I get the correct number of handelingen (7). When I include the person (called ‘Meelezer’), the measuere per action is multiplied by the number of persons/roles involved with that action.
When I changed the Aggregation rule in the report column #Handelingen to ‘Server Complex Aggregate’ I do get the correct endtotal:
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k24/The_Dutchman_2006/OBIEE/sample2.png
I believe it should be possible to define in the repository a different aggregation rule for individual dimensions, but I’ve not been able to achieve this.
Explained below is what I have created in my Physical and Business Model & Mapping layers:
The Physical Model is built like this:
(This is just a small part of a much larger physical model, but I’ve only included the most relevant tables)
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k24/The_Dutchman_2006/OBIEE/PhysicalDiagram-1.png
The Fact table (ALS Feit Zaakverloop) contains FK’s for the action (FK_HANDELING, joined to ALS Dim Handeling), the date the action took place (FK_DATUM_ZAAKVERLOOP, joined to ALS Dim Datum Zaakverloop) and the uniqe group of people involved (FK_MEELEZERS, joined to ALS Groep Meelezers) and a measure column (SUM_HANDELINGEN) populated with the value ‘1’ for each row.
The Bridge table (ALS Brug Meelezer/Reden Meelezen) contains three FK’s: FK_GR_MEELEZERS (joined to ALS Groep Meelezers), FK_MEELEZER (joined to ALS Dim Functionaris) and FK_REDEN_MEELEZEN (joined to ALS Dim Reden Meelezen).
The Business Model
In the business model, the four physical tables for the N:N relation have been combined into one logical dimension table.
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k24/The_Dutchman_2006/OBIEE/BusinessModel-1.png
DIM Meelezer contains one LTS in which the four physical tables have been combined:
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k24/The_Dutchman_2006/OBIEE/LTS1.png
And all the required locical columns have been created:
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k24/The_Dutchman_2006/OBIEE/LTS2.png
DIM Meelezer has also been identified as a bridge table and a Business Key has been defined on a combination of the FK’s in the bridge table and business codes of the two dimension tables.
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k24/The_Dutchman_2006/OBIEE/BMDIM.png
Next a hierachy was created for Dim Meelezer:
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k24/The_Dutchman_2006/OBIEE/Hier.png
In Feit Zaakverloop, a measurement called ‘# Handelingen’ was created using SUM_HANDELINGEN, with an aggregation rule of SUM.
In the LTS of both the DIM Meelezer and Feit Zaakverloop, the Logical Content Levels have both been set to: LVL Detail – Meelezer.
Please provide suggestions that will NOT require changes to the physical datamodel as they would require too much time to achieve (or at leats would not be ready before my deadline.
Thanks!
Edited by: The_Dutchman on Dec 13, 2011 11:43 AM

Hmm, no replies yet...
Am I in 'uncharted territory' with this issue?

How to define new derivation rules in FM module

Can somebody help me define a new derivation rule which is user specific in FM module. I want to map muliple Fund Centers to a single Cost center and also map many commitment items to a single GL.
Thanks
shivaji

You derive object X (fund centre) from object (Y) cost centre. In terms of logic, it's not possible to derive multiple values from single value. That's the concept of derivation. If you have cost centre (let's say ABCD), on what parameter will your logic decide whether to take fund centre XXXX or fund centre YYYY? As you understand, the FM posting should be done eventually on one fund centre as well as commitment item, fund, etc.
After all, the computer could be told what ever you have to tell it; if you, yourself, can make this decision - which FCtr should be taken - upon certain logic, it could be programmed as well in FMDERIVE.

How to define smart collection rules to match a folder's path?

I was hoping to define a tree of (smart) collections to match my folders tree, but coming up with a search criteria to match the folder path is proving difficult at best, impossible at worst.
Any ideas?

Hi John,
John R. Ellis wrote:
Perhaps the best you can do is
Folder contains words f1 f2 ... fn
where f1..fn are the elements of the path of the folder
Yes, that's exactly what I came up with, and for many folders it's correct, but for others - not so much...
Reminder: Using double spaces between words gets around the "big mallard ducks" (contains words) bug.
PS - I went ahead and purchased AnyFilter - I'll see what I can do with it :-)
Thanks,
Rob

How to use complex function as condition in Oracle Rule Decision Table?

How to use complex function as condition in Oracle Rule Decision Table?
We want to compare an incoming date range with the date defined in the rules. This date comparison is based on the input date in the fact & the date as defined for each rule. Can this be done in a decision table?

I see a couple of problems here.
First, what you posted below is not a syntactically valid query. It seems to be part of a larger query, specifically, this looks to be only the GROUP BY clause of a query.
Prabu ammaiappan wrote:
Hi,
I Have a group function in the Query. Below is the Query i have used it,
GROUP BY S.FREIGHTCLASS,
R.CONTAINERKEY,
S.SKU,
S.DESCR ||S.DESCRIPTION2,
S.PVTYPE,
RD.LOTTABLE06,
R.WAREHOUSEREFERENCE,
RD.TOLOC,
R.ADDWHO,
R.TYPE,
S.CWFLAG,
S.STDNETWGT,
S.ORDERUOM,
R.ADDDATE,
C.DESCRIPTION,
(CASE WHEN P.POKEY LIKE '%PUR%' THEN 'NULL' ELSE to_char(P.PODATE,'dd/mm/yyyy') END),
NVL((CASE WHEN R.ADDWHO='BOOMI' THEN RDD.SUPPLIERNAME END),SS.COMPANY),
RDD.BRAND,
S.NAPA,
RD.RECEIPTKEY,
R.SUSR4,
P.POKEY,
RDD.SUSR1,
r.STATUS, DECODE(RDD.SUSR2,' ',0,'',0,RDD.SUSR2),
rd.SUSR3Second, the answer to your primary question, "How do I add a predicate with with a MAX() function to my where clause?" is that you don't. As you discovered, if you attempt to do so, you'll find it doesn't work. If you stop and think about how SQL is processed, it should make sense to you why the SQL is not valid.
If you want to apply a filter condition such as:
trunc(max(RD.DATERECEIVED)) BETWEEN TO_DATE('01/08/2011','DD/MM/YYYY') AND TO_DATE('01/08/2011','DD/MM/YYYY')you should do it in a HAVING clause, not a where clause:
select ....
from ....
where ....
group by ....
having max(some_date) between this_date and that_date;Hope that helps,
-Mark

How to define Substitution rule for Businee area

Hi experts,
Could you please guide me to define substitution rule for Business are.
Below is the requiremnt :
I want to assign different business area for this cost centre.
While posting document in FB01, we are entering cost centre in line itme. Businee area is picking from cost centre master.
Example : Cost centre 11310 and businee area Y020.
Businee area Y020 is picking from cost centre 11310 while posting document.
I want to assign different business area for this cost centre.
For that I want to define substitution rule.
I have defined substitution rule and activated in comapany code but it is not working. Please guide me how to define Substitution rule for the same.
I have defined prerequisit as Comapny code = 2053 and Cost centre =11310 and transaction code = FB01 then
Substitute business area with Y045.
It is not working .
Please guide me where I did mistake and how to rectify the same.
Thanks in advance for your quick response and points will also assign for helpfull answer.
Regards,
Amar

Hi Paul,
Thaks for your reply.
Yes, you are correct. SAP is changing this back to BA from Cost centre.
Why can't we use Substitition for the above issue.
Then what is solution for my issue.Please suggest any alternative solution.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Amar.

HOW TO DEFINE POSTING RULE IN BRS STEPS

Very Good Morning SDN Community,
   any budy please let me know what is the logic behind defining the posting rules and how does it works.
The following are the posting rules.
   1. Cheque Deposite
   2. Cheque Issue
   3. Main Bank
   4. Bank Charges.
Now what should be the posting Area, Debit, Credit, posting Key, Account symbol, document type and posting type...
Thanks,
Have a nice day....

Hi,
Please refer to
http://www.sap-topjobs.com/bankreco.pdf
Regards

Reconciliation Rule for Trusted Sources

Is it possible to create a reconciliation rule for a trusted source based a user-defined field that stores a GUID? By default, OIM uses the user id in the reconciliation rule, however if the user id changes on the trusted source a recon. rule based on user id will never find a match - if I understand how the recon. rule works.
Has anyone attempted to use something other than user id in a recon. rule for a trusted source?
Thanks

I have a doubt here..please clear if i am able to sucessfully explain...in reconcilliation action we wrote that "No Match Found" --> "create User". it is working fine (for me it is Sun LDAP on other side)..but issue is that when it create a user in OIM...under resource profile no resource is coming as attached...then how can one knows that this user already had a profile in LDAP and need not created a new one and also we cannot provision the same user to LDAP as it is already there...means we cannot link these two user profiles (OIM and LDAP one)....but for feasible scenerion it should be...can anyone tell me where i am wrong and what other configuration needs to be done if it is a feasible scenerion..

References for developing Reconciliation Rules for OIM 11GR1

Good Day!
Hi Folks!
I would like to ask if you can share some references or any documents which tackles on the development or creation of reconciliation rules for OIM 11GR1. Currently, we are trying to pull users from a SAP system and provision them to MS AD. Currently, we want to develop reconciliation rules such that we can avoid doing manual ad-hoc link.
Aside from the documentation guide, are there any other references there available in helping us to develop recon rules from a simple definition and from there maybe we can pick it up to define a complex one?
All answers are appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Jeff

reconciliation rule support very limited operator. find the below link
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11223_01/doc.910/e11217/cnnctrcmpnts.htm#CEGJHBDC

How to define complex reconciliation rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for