How to install and configure ms exchange server 2007 both role hub and edge transport role in one network

How to install and configure ms exchange server 2007 both role hub and edge transport role in one network 

Hi,
Edge role is design for perimeter networks, to keep security risks minimum.  So it’s not recommended to have edge role in internal network. Must have separate network or subnet for edge services.
If you are playing around it in labs, then you can put edge role within same subnet as other exchange roles and no specific requirements in that case.
Thanks.
MachPanel - Premium Cloud Automation Solution

Similar Messages

  • How to recover mailbox details in Exchange server 2007

     
    Hi,
    Problem is Exchange server 2007 user mailbox has been deleted and it’s already purged. Now we need to recover that mailbox. Is there any way to recover purged mailbox in Exchange server 2007?
    Or we are planning create new mailbox and help me to find old mailbox server and database details then I will restore data from backup. Please suggest if you have better idea than this one. Thanks

    I would suggest using one of your backups and creating a recovery database and pulling the users mailbox from that recovery database. 
    http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2007/high-availability-recovery/Working-Recovery-Storage-Groups-Exchange-2007.html

  • Exchange Server 2007 shows email as "Receive" but not "Deliver"

    Hi Guys
    We have Exchange Server 2007 inside of a SBS 2008 set up.
    One specific email from a regular sender wasn't received by the recipient. The recipient is used to receiving messages from this sender and the email is not hiding within Outlook.
    Exchange 2007 mail tracker shows the email was received, but that's it. Nothing has happened to the email after that. Normally we'd see a "Deliver" report, or possibly a "Fail", but always something to show the email has been actioned
    in some way.
    The queues are all empty.
    So, this one email has disappeared into the ether of Exchange! So far as I can see, this is the only email with only a "Receive" notification. All others have something else immediately following the Receive.
    The Server has GFI anti-spam installed, but that hasn't seen the email either, because emails are collected by Exchange before being passed to GFI. In this instance it hasn't been passed, or returned to the sender as undeliverable. It just seems
    to have been eaten.
    Would anyone have any sensible suggestions on where to start kicking this email back into life?

    Hi Simon
    Apologies for the late response, but I only get to this client once a month.
    1. Did the sender get NDR? ~ No
    2. Let the receiver check the email via OWA and see
    whether the email is available. ~ Still not available
    3. Use MFCMAPI to check the user mailbox, can you
    find the missing email? ~ I haven't yet worked out what is MFCMAPI or how to use it to check, but I suspect that as the Exchange email tracker doesn't have any actions after "Receive" that it cannot have sent the email on to the user's mailbox or rejected
    the email as non-deliverable.
    The client isn't too willing to expend too much effort
    / cost on this issue which does appear to be a one-off glitch, but I am interested in resolving it for myself as I haven't heard of this problem before.
    Thanks for the interest,
    Michael D

  • How to install and configure the SQL Server

    Hi All,
    We have to install SQL server in the new server because the old server is crash and need to upgrade. Please advice How to install and configure the SQL Server to run SAP Business One 8.8 successfully and what part we do have to give attention.
    Kind Rgds,
    Steve

    Hi,
    Try this solution:
    The step-by-step installation guide can be found in the documentation included in the installation media. (\Documentation\SystemSetup\AdministratorGuide_SQL.pdf).
    Below are some important parts that you should pay attention to during the Installation process.
    Resolution
    Collation setting: It must be set as SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS,even the company DB is non-english location. The company DB will be created as corresponding collation settings automatically.
    Instance and TCP Port : It is recommended to run SBO on default instance and TCP port 1433. Otherwise,some optional components such as B1i may not work properly.
    Native Client: SQL Server Native Client should be installed on every client machine to enable the ODBC connection to DB server.
    Rgds,

  • How to install and configure NI Visa Server without having to install MAX?

    Hi,
    I need to install NI Visa Server on a computer so that remote systems can connect to the devices connected to it. However, the flash-drive on the computer is marked as "removable media" by the operating system which is causing the MAX installer to error out (this is a known problem with standard windows installers and removable media).
    Before pursuing a hardware change, I was wondering if there was a way to install and configure NI Visa Server on the embedded computer without having to install or configure through MAX?
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Hello!
    Your system should appear under remote systems and then you can right click on the software folder and install software. Our 8145s for instance have compact flash drives and this process works. Could you give me more details on your hardware? Are you getting an error message when you try to install the software?
    Allan S.

  • Installing and configuring microsoft sharepoint server 2013

    Could you please advise where can I get this book "installing and configuring microsoft sharepoint server 2013"? Thanks for your help.

    There is a free ebook here:
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30384
    It's also the title of a section of technet but that's not available in printed format as far as i know.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262957.aspx

  • How can I clone a completed Exchange Server 2013 in a Lab Enviroment?

    I was having great time with my Exchange Server 2013 until I tried to clone it to avoid fresh installation of another Exchange 2013 server. Steps taken
    (1)Clone the Exchange1 and turn it off
    (2) Brought the Clone Exchange2, renamed it, change the IP configurations,
    (3) Re-ran the ADprep/Doamin prep
    (4) Checked the ASDIedit to verify the Schema/configuration in AD
    (5) Restarted I and was able to logon to the Exchange2
    (6) Brought up the Exchange1, but unable to logon because the name was no longer in AD database
    What I did to fix this:
    (7) Rejoin the Exchange1 to the domain - and was able to logon
    (8) Unable to access ECP or OWA of any of the two servers.
    (9) Errors received - Fix the configuration file of the application
    My Question - How to I fix the configuration file as suggested (via powershell or GUI or ASDIedit.msc)?
     

    Unless you are cloning an entire environment, and then bringing it up in a seperate isolated environment, it is not supported to simply clone an Exchange Server, and then bring it online in an existing environment and rename it to save on setup and configuration
    time.
    You can script the setup and configuration of Exchange through Powershell, either with scripts or with another product controlling it - something like
    System Center Orchastrator.
    From the script side of things there are many available on peoples blogs. Check
    here.
    Edit: and to be clear, there is no need to re-run any prep tasks against Active Directory when installing a new Exchange Server, unless you are installing into a new domain as part of your Forest.
    Oliver
    Oliver Moazzezi | Exchange MVP, MCSA:M, MCITP:Exchange 2010,Exchange 2013, BA (Hons) Anim | http://www.exchange2010.com | http://www.cobweb.com | http://twitter.com/OliverMoazzezi

  • How to move all emails from mailbox to an external email account in Exchange Server 2007?

    I have a user who is leaving the university in a few days. The user would like to forward all of their old emails from their mailbox to their G-mail account. Will setting up email forwarding forward all of the old emails to the G-mail account or just the
    new emails that are received after setting up email forwarding? If forwarding isn't the correct solution; then what is? We are running Exchange Server 2007.

    No, as you've suspected the forwarding will only affect new messages coming into the mailbox, not existing ones. Additionally, if you did get all existing messages to forward to another account (you could probably do it by creating a rule in Outlook) then
    the gmail account would show every single one of them as arriving now, and lose their existing send date.
    Probably a better option would be to export the mailbox to .pst, and then assuming the user has their gmail account configured in Outlook somewhere as something other than POP3 they can then open the .pst file on their machine and copy the messages over
    to their gmail account, which I think would also preserve the original information.
    You could do that via the server using Export-Mailbox as described here
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/bb266964(v=exchg.80).aspx (note it has to be run from a 32-bit OS with the Exchange Management tools installed), or the user could just as easily do it themselves from within Outlook using the Export option.

  • Upgrading from SBS 2008 and Exchange Server 2007 and Adding Modest Failover Protection

    I haven't seen anyone describe this scenario, so maybe it can't be done, but it seems it should work. Can someone either confirm this is viable or set me straight and tell me it's not wise (and if not, why not).
    I currently have SBS 2008 (2008 Server + Exchange Server 2007 + some other components). I use redirected folders so all my user data is stored primarily on the server, and then sync'd with their local harddrives for roaming use and as an additional
    backup precaution. I want to upgrade to a modern version of Exchange (don't care too much about the underlying server OS, but seems like a good time to upgrade everything). I also want to improve the reliability for rapid recovery in the event of a system
    failure. I have always felt nervous with SBS because it only runs on a single server.
    My plan is:
    Install Windows Server 2012 Standard on a new server machine
    Join that new server to the existing SBS domain and sync the users, etc.
    Install Exchange Server 2013 on the new 2012 Server
    Migrate the existing Exchange data and account info to the new server
    Demote the SBS Server and promote the new server to primary DC
    Reformat the old SBS server and install Windows Server 2012 on it too, and join it to the domain as a second DC
    Set up DFS Replication and keep all my user data folders between the two servers (so if one server fails, the other can take over, just not automatically like with a cluster)
    Install Exchange Server 2013 on the reformatted 2012 Server box (so second instance on the domain) and set it up to sync with the first Exchange Server 2013 via DAG (so if either computer crashes, the other can take over for both Exchange Server and file
    services)
    Wouldn't that give me a complete slow-response failover system without the need for setting up a cluster (I know a cluster would provide instant failover protection, but I don't need that kind of speed - a manual switchover in the rare event of a server
    failure is acceptable for us)? I could do this using cheap hardware for each server, because unless both servers fail at the same time, clients can point to the other server. And because it's not a formal cluster, I don't need to buy anything for a shared
    SAN. This seems like such an obvious more cost-effective solution for a small network, I don't understand why this isn't a common approach, which makes me wonder if there is some reason it won't work.
    Any suggestions or feedback? Are Redirected Folders still recommended for users on a Server 2012-based domain?
    Thanks,
    Colin
    Colin

    Ed, thanks again for your help. OK, so here's my updated plan (I realize I should probably check on some of these pieces on the Server group, instead of this Exchange group).
    Constraints/objectives:
    None of the machines are truly server grade hardware, but only 5 people on the network, so performance is generally not an issue, unless a given server is just pegged on CPU or HD due to its own internal maintenance tasks and can't respond to user requests.
    Haven't seen any problems, since upgrading server from 4GB RAM to 8GB a few years ago.
    Not going to buy any new hardware at this time, but do have several unused consumer-grade computers I can deploy as wimpy or moderate servers.
    Main issue is to limit repair time in the event of a system failure (instant failover is not required, but want to be able to restore network functions within less than 24 hours in the event of a hardware failure) and minimize time spent on IT
    maintenance.
    Because of light IT maintenance (not anyone's primary job and we're too small to justify a dedicated IT person or to pay for outside help), almost every touch takes me research and time to re-learn what I haven't done in weeks, months, or years -- so also
    want to keep all IT tasks as simple as possible.
    We philosophically want to invest now for the next 5 years and avoid ongoing cloud fees (so zero interest in Windows Server Essentials with Exchange Online)
    A little nervous about using VM's, just because I never have before, but I do respect that's probably the right way to do many of these things...
    Currently I have SBS 2008 (Windows Server 2008 R2, Exchange Server 2007, WSUS 3, all with latest SP's, also includes SharePoint and other stuff, but I don't really care about most of it) on a single 8GB consumer grade system, which functions as a file
    server and Exchange server. We use Redirected Folders and Offline files for all users, which works great for us and provides additional file redundancy (if server goes down, all of each user's files are also on their own machine and they can even continue
    to work just fine w/o the server, losing only ability to send and receive e-mail). It has been sufficient, but I want to upgrade our version of Exchange and I am nervous that if that current one server fails, it would take me a long time to restore everything
    from backup, easily many days, especially if I need to buy any replacement hardware. It is RAID1, so a single drive failure is easy to handle, but that's the only hardware redundancy for the current server.
    New Plan:
    Install Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard on a new modest machine (16GBR RAM, Core i7, 1TB RAID1 (may upgrade to 3 or 4 TB), 256 GB SSD boot drive, this had been my old personal computer)
    Join that new server to the existing SBS domain (2008 R2/Exchange 2007), make it a DC, sync the users, etc.
    Install Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard on a wimpy computer (4GB RAM Core i3 processor), leave it as a member server
    Install Exchange Server 2013 on the wimpy new 2012 R2 Server (and nothing else, this will be dedicated to Exchange to make the most of such a wimpy machine)
    Migrate the existing Exchange data from the old SBS Exchange 2007 server and account info to the new server
    (or should I just create new accounts and copy the data from the user end through Outlook -- is that safer and cleaner than attempting any kind of server-level Exchange data migration?)
    Demote the old SBS Server and promote the new 16GB server to primary DC. Now it's OK to take the old SBS server off the network.
    Reformat the old SBS server and install Windows Server 2012 R2 on it too, and join it to the domain as a second DC (and possibly DCPROMO it to be the main server)
    Install Exchange Server 2013 in a VM on the reformatted 2012 R2 Server box (so second instance on the domain for Exchange redundancy) and set it up to sync with the first Exchange Server 2013 via DAG OR set up another physical wimpy member server and install
    it there. In any case, do NOT install Exchange directly on either DC.
    Set up DFS Replication or a Failover Cluster (still need to research this, but I had planned on DFS, thinking Cluster required shared drive, but Ed corrected me on this) between the two DC's for redirected files and keep all my user data folders between
    the two servers. We don't need automatic failover, like with a cluster, a manual switch would be acceptable, but if no additional cost or risk to clustering the two DC's, then the auto-failover protection that provides would be better than DFS.
    I think this incorporates all of your points, Ed. Does this sound right now? What's your advice on #5 (how to best migrate user data)?
    Thanks so much for all your help,
    Colin

  • Looking for help with respect to configuring MS Exchange server to handle attachments over 10 MB for forwarding to Salesforce (Email-to-case).

    Looking for help with respect to configuring MS Exchange server to handle attachments over 10 MB for forwarding to Salesforce (Email-to-case).
    Problem - SFDC does not create cases from emails that have more than 10 MB of attachments. Our clients will not go-live if their clients cannot send in emails with attachments over 10 MBs
    Potential resolution - Configure MS exchange to strip off the attachments(if over 10 MB) and store it in a public folder, forward the email to Salesforce (so the case gets created or the email
    is associated to an existing case), the client should have some way to know if the attachments were stripped off and should be able to dlownload the attachments and continue with case resolution.
    Any help is appreicated!
    Thanks

    Hi,
    From your description, you want to achieve the following goal:
    Configure Exchange to filter the attachments if the size is over 10 MB and store it in a public folder, and then forward the email to Salesforce.
    Based on my knowledge, I'm afraid that it can't be achieved. Exchange can filter messages with attachments, but it couldn't store these attachments on public folder automatically. Also, I don't see any transport rule can do it.
    Hope my clarification is helpful.
    Best regards,
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • How to keep MAPI properties when processing message data in RFC822 format in an Exchange Server 2007/2010 transport agent?

    We are developing an agent listening for the submit or endOfData event from the Exchange Server. Due to various reasons we need to convert the Exchange Mail
    internally to RFC822 format.
    So our MessageProcessor internally converts the message stream (usually TNEF) into RFC822 format. This means when written our modified content back to ‘e.MailItem’
    we write the converted content back.
    It seems that this conversion causes a loss of some MAPI properties of the message.
    When out-of-office-mails are enabled for an account the Exchange Server generates both messages the OOF message for internal recipients and the OOF message external
    recipients.
    When sending an internal message using voting buttons the message arrives without that voting information.
    void Agent_OnSubmittedMessage(SubmittedMessageEventSource source, QueuedMessageEventArgs e)
    MessageProcessor proc = new MessageProcessor();
    Stream messageContent = e.MailItem.GetMimeReadStream();
    Stream processedMail = proc.ProcessExchangeMessage(messageContent); // internally converts the message to RFC822
    Stream writeStream = e.MailItem.GetMimeWriteStream();
    processedMail.CopyToStream(writeStream);
    We also tried a dirty „hack“ using the Exchange Server internal method for converting the message from TNEF to RFC822 “ConvertAnyMimeToMime” from “Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Storage.OutboundConversionOptions”,
    but using that method causes the same issue.
    Now my idea was cloning all MAPI properties not related to the content of a message and reapply them after writing the RFC822 content back to into e.MailItem.
    Any idea how we can overcome our problems?
    Best regards,
    Harald Binkle
    Exchange Server Toolbox |
    SmartPOP2Exchange |
    SpamAssassin
    JAM Software GmbH
    Max-Planck-Str.22 * 54296 Trier * Germany
    http://www.jam-software.com

    Hello Scott,
    after posting this question I implemented a dirty workaround.
    Now I'd like to ged rid of that workaround. Are you still not allowed to discuss this?
    Best regards,
    Harald Binkle
    Exchange Server Toolbox |
    SmartPOP2Exchange |
    SpamAssassin
    JAM Software GmbH
    Am Wissenschaftspark.26 * 54296 Trier * Germany
    http://www.jam-software.com

  • Hi, in our Enterprise environment, we have a single mac with Mavericks version 10.9.2 and Office for Mac 14.4.1. When setting up outlook, we are trying to connect to a mailbox on exchange server 2007.

    Hi, in our Enterprise environment, we have a single mac with Mavericks version 10.9.2 and Office for Mac 14.4.1. When setting up outlook, we are trying to connect to a mailbox on exchange server 2007. We put in the EWS details in the server field since our autodiscover function is not functioning. But still it doesn't work. There are no errors, no popups. We turned on the logging and in the logs, it says a error of -3259. We are stuck and any help will be really appreciated.

    I have a customer experiencing exactly the same issue. Their computer is running Windows 7 Pro with Office 2007 SP3. After seemingly exhausting all troubleshooting options, I backed up their data, formatted the hard drive and performed a clean install of
    Windows and all their applications. It didn't solve the problem!
    What's strange is the customer also has a laptop computer, running the same version of Outlook, and that doesn't experience any problems connecting to Office 365 on the same network.
    My next step is to send the customer a new ADSL modem/router to try.
    I have another customer on Office 365, also running Outlook 2007, and they also experience issues with emails sitting in the outbox while Outlook displays the status message “Outlook is trying to retrieve data from the Microsoft exchange server outlook.office365.com.”
    In this case Outlook doesn't freeze/stop responding, like it does for the first customer I mentioned.

  • Spam Protection for Email showing Critical for Exchange Server 2007 after installing Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange

    Hi there,
    I have SBS 2008, and I have recently installed Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange  version 7.5 but when I take a look on Windows SBS Console under Security, it shows "Spam Protection for Email Critical Exchange Server 2007" However,
    when I open the SMSME it shows running well with no problem..
    Any Suggestions???
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Would you please let me confirm whether all functions (which are related to Exchange Server) run as normal? Just
    a confirmation, thanks for your understanding.
    Please run
    SBS BPA and check if find relevant issues. In addition, please refer to GaryD9’s suggestion in following thread and check if can help you.
    SBS
    2008 & Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange - SBS Console Error
    If any update, please feel free to let me know.
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Autodiscover Exchange Server 2007 and 2013 Coexistence

    Hello
    We are having some issues where some users are not being notified when their mailbox is being migrated to E2013.
    Before 2013, we never had a load balanced solution for CAS in Exchange Server 2007 or a single name space.
    Below is our current config
    AutoDiscoverServiceCN          : Server2K7CASpd
    AutoDiscoverServiceClassName   : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
    AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://legacy.domain.int/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml
    AutoDiscoverServiceGuid        : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
    AutoDiscoverSiteScope          : {USChicago, UKLondon, SGSingapore}
    AutoDiscoverServiceCN          : Server2k7CASdr
    AutoDiscoverServiceClassName   : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
    AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://legacy.domain.int/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml
    AutoDiscoverServiceGuid        : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
    AutoDiscoverSiteScope          : {USChicago, UKLondon, SGSingapore}
    AutoDiscoverServiceCN          : Server2013CASPD01
    AutoDiscoverServiceClassName   : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
    AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://autodiscover.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
    AutoDiscoverServiceGuid        : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
    AutoDiscoverSiteScope          : {UKLondon}
    AutoDiscoverServiceCN          : Server2013CASPD02
    AutoDiscoverServiceClassName   : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
    AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://autodiscover.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
    AutoDiscoverServiceGuid        : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
    AutoDiscoverSiteScope          : {UKLondon}
    AutoDiscoverServiceCN          : Server2013CASDR02
    AutoDiscoverServiceClassName   : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
    AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://autodiscover.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
    AutoDiscoverServiceGuid        : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
    AutoDiscoverSiteScope          : {UKLondon}
    AutoDiscoverServiceCN          : Server2013CASDR01
    AutoDiscoverServiceClassName   : ms-Exchange-AutoDiscover-Service
    AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri : https://autodiscover.domain.int/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
    AutoDiscoverServiceGuid        : 77378f46-2c66-4aa9-a6a6-3e7a48b19596
    AutoDiscoverSiteScope          : {UKLondon}
    I believe that we should change the AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri on the two 2007 CAS to ALSO be the same as our 2013 CAS.
    We know that when Outlook is opened, Autodiscover will respond with any of the 6 available CAS, and we think that those Outlook clients that are misconfigured, are those that are not getting notified when their Mailbox is moved to E2013.
    Thanks

    We are also getting inconsistent results using the Test-OutlookWebServices PS
    Test 1
    Test-OutlookWebServices -Identity [email protected] | fl
    Id      : 1003
    Type    : Information
    Message : About to test AutoDiscover with the e-mail address [email protected].
    Id      : 1006
    Type    : Information
    Message : The Autodiscover service was contacted at https://legacy.domain.local/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml.
    Id      : 1016
    Type    : Success
    Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the AS service at https://ServerCASpd05.domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed
              time was 76 milliseconds.
    Id      : 1015
    Type    : Success
    Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the OAB service at https://ServerCASpd05.domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed
              time was 0 milliseconds.
    Id      : 1014
    Type    : Success
    Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the UM service at https://ServerCASdr05.domain.local/UnifiedMessaging/Service.asmx.
              The elapsed time was 558 milliseconds.
    Id      : 1016
    Type    : Success
    Message : [EXPR]-Successfully contacted the AS service at https://legacy.domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed time
              was 46 milliseconds.
    Id      : 1015
    Type    : Information
    Message : [EXPR]-The OAB is not configured for this user.
    Id      : 1014
    Type    : Information
    Message : [EXPR]-The UM is not configured for this user.
    Id      : 1013
    Type    : Error
    Message : When contacting https://mail.domain.local/Rpc received the error The remote server returned an error: (404) Not
              Found.
    Id      : 1017
    Type    : Error
    Message : [EXPR]-Error when contacting the RPC/HTTP service at https://mail.domain.local/Rpc. The elapsed time was 93
              milliseconds.
    Id      : 1006
    Type    : Success
    Message : The Autodiscover service was tested successfully.
    Id      : 1021
    Type    : Information
    Message : The following web services generated errors.
                  Contacting server in EXPR
              Please use the prior output to diagnose and correct the errors.
    Test 2
    Test-OutlookWebServices -Identity [email protected] | fl
    Id      : 1003
    Type    : Information
    Message : About to test AutoDiscover with the e-mail address [email protected].
    Id      : 1006
    Type    : Information
    Message : The Autodiscover service was contacted at https://legacy.Domain.local/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml.
    Id      : 1016
    Type    : Success
    Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the AS service at https://ServerCASpd05.Domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed
              time was 46 milliseconds.
    Id      : 1015
    Type    : Success
    Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the OAB service at https://ServerCASpd05.Domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed
              time was 0 milliseconds.
    Id      : 1014
    Type    : Success
    Message : [EXCH]-Successfully contacted the UM service at https://ServerCASdr05.Domain.local/UnifiedMessaging/Service.asmx.
              The elapsed time was 15 milliseconds.
    Id      : 1016
    Type    : Success
    Message : [EXPR]-Successfully contacted the AS service at https://legacy.Domain.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx. The elapsed time
              was 78 milliseconds.
    Id      : 1015
    Type    : Information
    Message : [EXPR]-The OAB is not configured for this user.
    Id      : 1014
    Type    : Information
    Message : [EXPR]-The UM is not configured for this user.
    Id      : 1017
    Type    : Success
    Message : [EXPR]-Successfully contacted the RPC/HTTP service at https://legacy.Domain.local/Rpc. The elapsed time was 187
              milliseconds.
    Id      : 1006
    Type    : Success
    Message : The Autodiscover service was tested successfully.

  • Migrate Active Directory 2003 to 2012 R2 and Exchange Server 2007 to 2013.

    My question is which one need to migration first. Active Directory 2003 to 2012 R2 and FFL & DFL or Exchange Server 2007 to 2013.
    Md. Ramin Hossain

    My question is which one need to migration first. Active Directory 2003 to 2012 R2 and FFL & DFL or Exchange Server 2007 to 2013.
    Domain. For Exchange installation and upgrading to 2013, you need to make sure that your domain controllers can understand attributes of exchange 2013. Besides if you have DC/Exch on the same server which is 2003 is not supported. Because Windows Server
    2003 is not supported.
    Migrate your domain to at least 2008 R2 and then proceed with Exchange 2013.
    Mahdi Tehrani   |  
      |  
    www.mahditehrani.ir
    Please click on Propose As Answer or to mark this post as
    and helpful for other people.
    This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    How to query members of 'Local Administrators' group in all computers?

Maybe you are looking for