How to prevent summation only for some kf?

Hi all!
I have a question concerning a problem we have in a query.
I have a query that show, depending for project revision (witch
refer to 0calmonth), trend of various key figures in the quarters
I've planned in a specific project revision.
For example, for revision 062004, the query result is the following:
A/F Actual Forecast
Quart. Acc.Bef. 30/09/03 31/12/03 31/03/04 30/06/04 Tot
Ricavi    594    1.543    5.299    (510)   5.219 19.785
Costi     552    1.457    5.425     456    6.119 21.366
IMG         0        0        0       0        0    519
Av.Tec.   2,0 %    5,0 %   11,0 % 38,0 %   76,0 % 0,0 %
Av.Eco.   2,0 %    5,0 %   11,0 % 37,0 %   65,0 % 0,0 %
You can see the following values:
Avanz. Tecnico ***. alla data: 76%
Avanz. Economico ***. alla data: 65% referring to
last actual value (30/06/2004).
In another query we would see the forecast
referring to total, that we associated to quarter '25001'
for all project revisions.
We would see this total for all key figures except
Avanz. Tecnico ***. alla data and
Avanz. Economico ***. alla data, for witch we would see
the value referring to the last quarter actual, that you
can see in the previous report (76% and 65%).
If you launch the query I see, for the mentionned key figures, the values
132% and 120% for revision jun-04.
Project rev. mar-03 sep-03 dec-03 mar-04 jun-04 sep-04
Ricavi       19.203 19.785 38.988 19.785 19.785 19.785
Costi        17.347 18.078 36.609 20.466 21.366 21.366
IMG             519    519 1.038    519    519    519
Av. Tec         0,0%   0,0%   0,0%   56,0% 132,0% 158,0%
Av. Eco         0,0% 14,0% 52,0%   55,0% 120,0% 133,0%
The problem is that the system do addition of percentage for all quarter
related to revision 062004 (25113876=132!!!!), while I would see
only the last quarter actual. But I don't would see drilldown by quarter in the query.
I tried to use the variables type replacement path,
but I don't use it because I'm in a structure.
Does it exists some tricks that I can use to resolve this
complicated situation?
Fabio

Hi Mav.
Thanks for your patience.
I've doing also the other two checks, but the problem persists.
I think this isn't a malfunction, it's correct that system aggregates without quarter drilldown.
But in this case I would prevent it only for this kf.
Have you got some ideas in the structure selection to limit the exctraction to the last quarter actual?
Maybe with a variable exit.
Fabio

Similar Messages

How to set Display Only for some records in CAT2 Worklist

Hi,
I have a requirement to modify an attributes for some records in the Worklist of CAT2.
We have an external system where we book our time. Weekly we import data from that external system into CATSDB using BAPI for every single employee.
We would like when the user wants to modify his time sheet to be able to add/modify all records except those which were imported from the external system. Which means that those records should be in Display only mode / grayed out / before release.
Is there any user exit or BADI that could help to modify that attribute and that will be triggered before displaying the Worklist ?
Please advise !
Thanks,
Stefan

I've solved the problem.
First I've added customer field in CI_CATSDB structure and when I am importing the data I am populating that field with 'X', which means that this is record from the external application.
I've created enhancement implementation in Function group->CATS, screen->2003 MODULE->D2000_MODIFY_LOOP, subroutine->modify_d2000_loop where I am checking the field mentioned above if it is 'X' I am modifying the screnn-output = off.
It works, thak you for your help.
Regards,
Stefan

How do I add a new user to my account? But I wanna give him a special product (e.g. InCopy) only for some month...

I am admin and I want to add a new user to my account. But as written above, I want that he/she will get this product only for some month and not for a whole year.
Thanks for the help.

Team license links that may help
-manage your team account http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1460939?tstart=0
-Team Installer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1363686?tstart=0

How to prevent error message for material description in MDG material detail screen, when user click on check action

Dear Experts,
I have a requirement for making material description as non mandetory in change request view of mdg material screen.
I have done that using field usage in get data method of feeder classes, but still message is displaying.
This message 'Material description is mandatory is displaying with check action only, but not with save or submit after i anhance field property as not mandetory.
How to prevent error message for material description in MDG material detail screen, when user click on check action.
Thanks
Sukumar

Hello Sukumar
In IMG activity "Configure Properties of Change Request Step", you can completely deactivate the reuse area checks (but will then loose all other checks of the backend business logic as well).
You can also set the error severity of the checks from Error to Warning (per CR type, not per check).
Or you provide a default value for the material description, e.g. by implementing the BAdI USMD_RULE_SERVICE.
Regards, Ingo Bruß

Auto closing of dispute cases--only for some company codes

Hi
We have activated dispute management for several company codes in our system. The auto closing of dispute cases also has been activated in status management. Cases are automatically closed by the system (through a batch job) when the last disputed object is cleared.
Now there is a requirement to deactivate auto closing only for some company codes. They want to close cases manually in these company codes.
Is this possible and if so how?
Regards
Raj.

You cannot deselect at a company code level.
Can we go through you proposed process.
So you have a dispute for $100.
The customer pays it and the dispute closes.
Then the customer calls up and says they have an issue with the invoice they paid previously.
I have seen this happen before but there was a little twist
1 - The customer raised a debit note against the client for the issue that they had. The original invoice is cleared but a debit note is created and then disputed and processed. So you can close the original dispute and create a new dispute against the debit note
2 - The customer paid the wrong invoice. The dispute was closed. However to rectify the miss allocation the clearing document will be reversed meaning the dispute is "re-opened" and can be processed.
I am unaware of any other requirement for a customer to "re-dispute" a paid item in SAP.

PA only for some CC under some controlling area

Hello!
If all company codes are under the some controlling area, when CO PA operating concern is created, how can I activate CO PA only for some company codes and not to others?
Is there a way we can restrict all postings to PA only in some company codes?
What are the basic steps to activate planning in CO PA?
(transactions, procedures, etc)
Many thanks in advance!
Alexandra

Try Season Pass FAQ's > iTunes Store: Complete My Season frequently asked questions (FAQ)

How to hide edit link for some rows in report? (according to value of col)

Helo,
How to hide edit link for some rows in report? (according to value of column)
regards
siyavuş

Hi siyavuş
You can do this by taking the edit link off the report and putting it into your report SQL.
Use something like Select CASE WHEN (condition) THEN
'Put your edit link in here as an html Anchor like<a href="(target)">Edit</a>'
ELSE
tt.value
END edit_link
FROM test_table tthope it helps,
Gus..
You can reward this reply (and those of other helpers) by marking it as either Helpful or Correct.
This allows forum users to quickly find the correct answer.
;-)

Outlook asking for username and password, but only for some users

Hello, I'm
in an Exchange Server 2013 client
environment, two CAS servers
and two Mailbox.
Some users are having trouble in Outlook 2007
and 2012, which is directly
requesting the user name and password, not all,
just some.
The Active Directory is ok,
DNS and also own Exchange
servers apparently do not see errors.
Has anyone here ever experienced this?
How can I solve this problem?
As this happens only to some users
and the vast majority have no problems, so
difficult to find the cause.
Thank you!
Ivanildo Teixeira Galvão

Hi Ivanildo,
From your description, only some users have an issue that Outlook prompts for username and password. In your case, I recommend you compare the normal and problematic Outlook settings. Here is the Outlook settings in my environment for your reference:
1. "Always prompt for logon credentials" isn't checked.
2. Logon network security using Negotiate Authentication.
3. "Connect to Microsoft Exchange using HTTP" is checked.
4. Use the NTLM Authentication when connecting to my proxy server for Exchange.
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

LMS4.1 how to suppress operationallydown events for some interfaces

Hi,
Installed Cisco Prime LMS last week. Everthing seems to be running fine. We configured LMS to send e-mail for certain events. One of them is operationallydown/up events. There are some devices for which we only want to see those events for some of the interfaces. For example: there is a device with several ISDN interfaces. Those are used by business partners to dial-in. We expect those interfaces to go up and down several times per day. We don't want any events/e-mails for that. I can't seem to figure out how to configure that. If anyone can help me with that, it would be greatly appreciated.
We come from LMS2.6, but didn't do an upgrade. It's a big leap, everything works different now.
Regards,
Arjan Hummel

Operation down events a usually due to admin up, line protocol down interfaces. The only way to fix that is to put the interface admin down
When you talk about BRI or PRI channels its a different story
Look at NMSROOT/objects/smarts/conf/discovery/tpmgr-param.conf.
Add a line like this, but with the sysobjectid of your device.
IFDescrPattern-.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1045 ~*Bearer*
Something like this should work, but you need to rediscover the device.
Cheers,
Michel

How to exclude Required Validation for some fields?

Hi,
I have a page in a form with some fields that are set as required like this:
Field 1 Field 2
table
Field 3 Field4 "Add" button
Field 5 Field 6
"Submit" button
There are two buttons in this form. The "Add" button is PPR allows adding Field 3 and Field 4 to the table. The "Submit" button is for the actual submission and processing. When "Add" button is pressed, I only want the require validation to be done for Field 3 and Field 4, but not Field 1/Field 2/Field 5/Field 6.
Currently, if I press "Add" button, the required field validations are triggered for all six fields. How can I only limit the require validation to some required fields only for this button?
Thanks
-Mina

subform is a great idea and kinna what I needed in this situation, but there is another challenge.
In my case, I tried to put table, Field 3 and Field 4 in subform:
Field 1 Field 2
<af:subform>
table
Field 3 Field4 "Add" button
</af:subform>
Field 5 Field 6
"Submit" button
When I press "Add" button, Required validation still triggered for all fields. Only if I put Field 1 and Field 2 in another subform, and Field 5 and Field 6 in a different subform. Then it works like this:
<af:subform>
Field 1 Field 2
</af:subform>
<af:subform>
table
Field 3 Field4 "Add" button
</af:subform>
<af:subform>
Field 5 Field 6
"Submit" button
</af:subform>
But in my case, I need Field 1, Field 2, Field 5, Field 6 and "Submit" button to be in the same subform, as the "Submit" button applies to these four fields. In the UI design, Field 3 and Field 4 are between Field 1/Field 2 and Field 5/Field 6 though.
Any other ideas?

Catalog items visible to everyone, purchaseable only for some users

Hello everybody
Me again trying to find a solution to the following problem:
We need to have some items in our catalog that are visible for every user but only purchaseable via shopping cart / SRM for some authorized users. I couldn't find any possibility in the customizing. So my attempt would be to add an additional attribute in CCM where I can put some kind of flag and then to construct an authorization check based on that flag and on a authorization profile. In case the authorization check fails, the catalog item may not be put in the shopping cart. Preferabily the shopping cart icon should be disabled for such items.
Did somebody out there already think about something similar or already implemented something like that?
It would also be a good basis for offering a publicly viewable, browseable catalog for "window shopping", because I also didn't find a way until now to publish the catalog as a standalone web application without shopping cart functionality.
What do you out there think about it?
Kind regards,
Renaud

Hi Christophe
Thanks a bunch for your great help! I could solved the problem and am now able to have some catalog items visible but only purchaseable for authorized users. This is what I've done:
1. Create a new authorization class (SU21)
2. Create a new authorization object within this class
3. Create a new authorization field within this object
Don't forget to save and quit the SU21 transaction and then reenter it (/nsu21) because only then you'll see your changes / additions... seems to be a "refresh-bug" in SU21.
4. Create a new role (PFCG) and an authorization profile containing the new authorization object. Assign the values needed.
5. Create a new attribute in CCM and assigned it to OCI cust_field5 (because this one is of type TEXT50)
6. Implemented some code in BAdI BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER:
DATA: wa_et_sc_item_data TYPE BBP_PDS_SC_ITEM_D.
DATA: wa_catalog_content TYPE BBP_WS_OCI_ITEM_S.
DATA: lv_authorized TYPE c.
DATA: lt_limtab TYPE TABLE OF string.
DATA: wa_limtab(10) TYPE C.
DATA: lv_message_v1 LIKE SY-MSGV1.
DATA: lv_message_v2 LIKE SY-MSGV2.
DATA: lv_message_v3 LIKE SY-MSGV3.
DATA: lv_message_v4 LIKE SY-MSGV4.
LOOP AT et_sc_item_data INTO wa_et_sc_item_data.
* Get corresponding line from transferred catalog data
READ TABLE catalog_content INTO wa_catalog_content
 WITH KEY line = wa_et_sc_item_data-number_int
 BINARY SEARCH.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
* If field content for checking authority against is not empty...
 IF NOT wa_catalog_content-cust_field5 IS INITIAL.
* Perform authority check
 AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT '<your auth.object here>'
 ID '<your auth.field here>'
 FIELD wa_tab.
 IF sy-subrc <> 0.
 MOVE wa_catalog_content-cust_field5 TO lv_message_v1.
 MOVE wa_et_sc_item_data-ordered_prod TO lv_message_v2.
* Eliminate leading zeroes from product number
 WHILE lv_message_v2+0(1) = '0'.
 SHIFT lv_message_v2.
 ENDWHILE.
* Output message
 MESSAGE ID 'ZXXX'
 TYPE 'W'
 NUMBER '000'
 WITH lv_message_v1
 lv_message_v2.
* Remove item from SC
 DELETE et_sc_item_data.
 ENDIF.
 ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Interesting observation is, that when issueing the message with type = 'I' it does not condense the message text. With type = 'W' it does...
I also found out the reason, why the way via ET_SC_MESSAGES will not work: SAP has hard coded somewhere after the BAdI call the message id and message number... so no way to bypass this without a modification.
Kind regards,
Renaud

ALV_grid oo: event "data_changed" on F4 in the line only for some fields

Hi all,
when I add a new line in ALV_Grid and I select the search help, for some fields
the event "data_changed" has triggered even I have not finished to fill the entire fields on the line, and I don't need this.
Opposite I have some fields which work fine and when I choose F4 the list of the
possible values has showed without triggering "data_changed".
Does anyboby know how is it possible?
Since I'm new on ALV_grid oo, could you give a detailed answer?
I thank You in advance.
 Best Regards
 Paolo

I solved the problem int this way:
METHODS:
 handle_data_changed
 FOR EVENT data_changed
 OF cl_gui_alv_grid
 IMPORTING er_data_changed
 e_onf4 e_onf4_before e_onf4_after.
METHOD handle_data_changed.
DATA: ls_good TYPE lvc_s_modi.
error_in_data = space.
IF e_onf4 IS INITIAL.
CALL METHOD check_righe_doppie ( er_data_changed ).
CALL METHOD update_delta_tables ( er_data_changed ).
CALL METHOD semantic_checks ( er_data_changed ).
ENDIF.
ENDMETHOD. "handle_data_changed
Message was edited by:
 Paolo Cavallini

How to configure Reconciliation only for a particular resource

Hi All,
I have a requirement to configure target reconciliation from AD only for a client. For that i have installed the conector as per documentation (both prov and recon). Now how can i make sure that:-
1. When i disable/enable the user in OIM, corresponding target resource will not be disabled/enabled.
2. If i make any changes on resource form corresponding change should not flow back to AD.
Does removing the prov related jar able to ensure these things or i need to remove the corresponding prov lookup or any changes required in configuration lookup? Please suggest...TIA

Change the drop down option to "Disable Process..."
Attach tcComplete event handler there.
In Task to Object Status Mapping, select Disabled in front of completed.
Now suppose user is PROVISIONED to a resource say Test. So whenever user gets DISABLED in OIM, it will disabled the target resource Test. But in actual the target resource will not be disabled for that user. He/She can access that resource after getting disabled as you haven't put the logic to disable the target resource (as you have used tcComplete here).
As you are saying that it should show disabled only if Disabled is coming from Trusted Resource. Then it's fine till now.
If you don't want to show status as Disabled then in Task to Object Status Mapping, do not select Disabled in front of completed. In this case, it will show status as PROVISIONED only. This is wrong.
I'll try to understand what you have written here ->
BUT NOW THE ISSUE. IT DISABLED MY ASSOCIATED RESOURCE (not in target resource actually but on oim side under resources tab). THIS IS ACTUALLY NOT DESIRABLE.
- > It will do as you are using tcComplete. If you put your java code which disables the target resource in integration tab (in form of process task adapter instead of tcComplete) then it will disables the actual target resource for user.
REAL REQUIREMENT IS THAT FOR NOW (*till provisioning is not configured*) OIM DISABLE SHOULD NOT INVOKE THE DISABLE OF ASSOCIATED TARGET RESOURCE NOR IT CHANGED THE STATUS UNDER RESOURCES TAB FOR PARTICULAR RESOURCE. THE STATUS UNDER RESOURCES TAB SHOULD ONLY BE CHANGED WHILE RECONCILIATION.
-> As you have written, "Till provisioning is not configured", So if provisioning is not configured then it will not show disabled under Resource tab for that particular resource.
You can see disabled only after resource is provisioned to that user.
If this doesn't answer your question, it would be better if you explain your requirement clearly. It's not clear.

Open Posting Period only for some specific user?

Dear all,
does someone have any idea, how could a posting period in ucmon be opened only for several specific user?
Is that possible?
Many thanks.
Hallochen
Edited by: hallochen on Sep 22, 2011 2:45 PM

Depending on the requirement
May be you can open it for a specific Cons Group(assuming User has authorization for that group) which translates back to opening it for specific user only
If user needs to work on more than 1 cons groups & has authorization then a step by step approach will help
rgds
D

How to run MRP only for MRP area ?

Dear Gurus,
I am going to run collective MRP only for one MRP area, not for whole plant. How to do it?
MD03----is only for one material.
MD01----is at plant level
Thanks in anticipation.
Jason
Edited by: Jason Ma on May 6, 2008 4:44 PM

Can you be more specific?
MD21 - Display Planning File Entries? Is this related to MRP run and how?

How to prevent summation only for some kf?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for