How to print structural design of OM structure

Hi guru
I have one issue, when i click on graphical structure button in TC ppom_old, another screen apperaed and i am not able to take a printout of that graphical structure from this screen, print button is disable and when i click on structure -->print the system is hanged on.
please help me ,
regards
waseem

Hai Waseem
Check T.code : SPAD ,your device is connected rightly,
Go to the Transaction---- Check Output devices-----"Display" you will get List of printers,check rightly connected,and
Check T.Code : SU3 -
defaults-----output Devices-check the printer name.
Or else get assistance from Basis
Hope this will helps
Vincent

Similar Messages

How to print / save Structural Graphics

I want to print structural graphics displayed by a standard report. The print button there does not print anything.
Any clues on how I can print / save the structural graphics?
More information: FM standard is using to show the graphics is:
    CALL FUNCTION 'PD_STRUCTURAL_GRAPHICS'
      EXPORTING
        context_id           = 'GENERAL'
        index                = ls_node-id
        load_pd_toolbox      = 'X'
        load_pd_profiles     = 'X'
      EXCEPTIONS
        no_objects_available = 1
        OTHERS               = 2.
That internally calls GRAPH_STRUCTURAL.
Report that we are using to test: RHXSTR00
Thanks in adv.

Hi,
Why don't you use the function "excel inplace" in the ALV? With the ALV you have some buttons "SORT/TOTAL/FILTER... and you have PRINT and EXCEL INPLACE"?
Do you use the method   call method g_grid->set_table_for_first_display in order to display your data alv?
Best regards

How to achieve Structures in InfoProvider area in Query Designer?

Hi,
How to achieve Structures in InfoProvider area in Query Designer? When I was observing some standard Queries, I observed Structure( With KF and Without KF ) along with KeyFigures & Dimensions in Infoprovider area. I was wondered about , how it was possible? Can anyone clarify regarding this issue? I am suppose to creta some queries for HR reorts........
Regards,
Suman

Hi Suman,
Structures are two types, one is local and other is Global.
Structures that you have seen at Infoprovider level are Global, those we can use for any query developed on Infoprovider.
Local structures cannot be used for other queries, those are local to that query only.
Structures we can define at Rows and Column levels. We can define for Characteristics and Keyfigures also.
To define a strucure, Right click on Rows/Columns area and say New Structure and add the fields you required so that query is defined as Local, If we want to make that strucure as Global-- then Right click on the Strucure and say Save as and Save it with proper description and technical name, then that structure will become Global Structure and it appears in the Infoprovider level.
Remember we can a maximum of Two Strucures for a Query, there is no limitatiion to define the number of Global structures at Infoprovider level.
Hope this helps.
Veerendra.

How to create structures

hi all,
please let me know how to create structures in directory tree of the selected info provider,
thanks in advace
manu

Hi,
I think you mean query strrucutures in Query designer. Goto rows/columns. Right click on columns and choose new structure. Now you can define all fields for your structure. Right click and choose new selection or formula. Then right click and choose save as. Now you can save it as reusable structure for other queries.
Regards,
Juergen

FM to retrieve help data of a screen field? How to fill structure PHELP?

Hi Experts,
Iam designing dynamic search helps. With connection to this
i have to get the preliminary data about the screen field. i.e the technical details
of F1 help of a particular field. Is there any function module which take input as
screen field name and fetch me its details like domain, database table etc?
How does the structure PHELP be loaded at run time?
Thanks,
Satish.

hi
you can try 'DYNP_READ' or 'DYNP_VALUES'
To read the contents of a screen data- its fields, characters, values and positions.
Thanks.

How to get structure of IDOC into xi in the scenario is IDOC - XI - File

hi XI Guys,
When i want to Integrate SAP sys(IDOC) with File how to get structure of IDOC into XI, As we will define Data types in File -> XI -> File. Please send Step by Step process as i am new to Netweaver(XI)
ThankYou,
B.Pushparaju.

When i want to Integrate SAP sys(IDOC) with File how to get structure of IDOC into XI
>>>>
import the IDoc under the imported object in your SCV. Note that import should be allowed for the SCV.
As we will define Data types in File -> XI -> File.
>>>>
Ref. these blogs to help you out ..
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/02/introduction-to-simplefile-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart1
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/03/introduction-to-simple-file-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart2

How do you structure a .book with an EDD?

Hi all,
I am learning how to convert legacy, unstructured FM documents into structured FM documents and need some help. So, I created a conversion table from my unstructured documents, created the EDD, applied the EDD to the unstructured document to create a structured document and now need to tweak the EDD.
My question is, what is the correct way to layout the EDD rules for a book using multiple document styles? For example: My book contains a title page, TOC, one or more chapters, a glossary of terms, and one or more appendixes (or is that a appendicies?.)
I am thinking the element rule would look something like this:
Element (Container): BOOK
Valid as the highest-level element.
General rule: TitlePage, TOC, Chapter+, Index, Appendix+
Followed of course by other elements required for the structure. However, I did see an EDD that I am sure was outlined like this (though I can't recall where:)
Element: TitlePage
Valid as the highest-level element.
General rule: Blah blah blah
Element: TOC
Valid as the highest-level element.
General rule: Blah blah blah
Element: Chapter
Valid as the highest-level element.
General rule: Blah blah blah
Element: Index
Valid as the highest-level element.
General rule: Blah blah blah
Element: Appendix
Valid as the highest-level element.
General rule: Blah blah blah
If the second structure is correct, how do you define the Book element? On the Adobe forum, I was told one EDD should be created for all book elements, which makes sense to me.
Okay people, fire away. Remember I am a neophyte in structured FM.
Thanks,
Adam

Thanks Van, that does clear it up for me... a little. My confusion now is, if I set all the book sections as valid at the highest level, then how does the book get structured as the starting point for the sections contained within it? I have tried to find a sample EDD detailing exactly this, but to no avail - my search brought up courses where this is covered, but not the actual EDD structure.
When I try to structure the book with the EDD, the book comes up red with its children elements looking just fine. Ahh! You have to love that learning curve.
Regards,
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:43:41 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: How do you structure a .book with an EDD?
Adam,
Following up on some of Russ's sage advice, you asked:
If the second structure is correct, how
do you define the Book element? On the Adobe forum, I was told one EDD
should be created for all book elements, which makes sense to me.
As Russ said, your BOOK element looks fine. Not sure how far you have gotten, but when you open a document file that is in the book, its root element will be Chapter, TitlePage, Appendix, etc. That is why you have to declare each of these as being valid at the highest level. When you click in the book file window and look at the structure view, you will see that the BOOK element is the root element, and its content will be TitlePage, TOC, Chapter, Chapter,...etc. The book and all of its component files have the same EDD. The definitions for the BOOK element, as well as the TitlePage, TOC, Chapter, etc elements are all contained in the same EDD. I hope this helps to answer your question.
Van
>

How to create Structures in Bex in BI7,

Experts,
can some one explain me in breif how to create structures in BI 7 also can we create a variable on 0FISCPER if so how.
also if some one had a quick look document on bex reporting in BI 7 please forward it to [email protected]
Thanks in Advance
Ravi

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/c1/759b3c4d4d8d15e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/4d/e2bebb41da1d42917100471b364efa/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/f1/0a5632e09411d2acb90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/43/7127d2b5263457e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/82/02223c5f00612be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/44/4fc09c78ef4e35e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm

How to use Structures of Variant Configuratin in BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROM2

Can any one help me by telling How to use Structures of Variant Configuratin in BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROM2
the structures are :QUOTATION_CFGS_REF, QUOTATION_CFGS_INST, QUOTATION_CFGS_PART_OF, QUOTATION_CFGS_VALUE.
What the necessary parameters to be passed ?
Thanks,
Mohan

Ankur,
I change the Structure Scope to B and Application SD01, but it seems conflict with the config strategy and variant matching. So, in VA21, material can't be determined by system automatically through choosing characteristics. System expands all the material of the top material. Like this:
AA
Aa
aa
ab
Ba
ba
bb
Are there some mistakes in my Item Category configuration?
Thanks.
Edited by: wayne wu on Jun 21, 2011 4:41 AM

How to use structure QUOTATION_CFGS_VALUE in BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROMDATA2

Hi All,
I am using bapi for quotation creation BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROMDATA2
I want to know how to use structure QUOTATION_CFGS_VALUE in BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROMDATA2.
This structure is used for Variant Configuration.
Can you please help me.
Thanks in advance.
Mohan kumar

Hi
I am also looking for same code(Create quotation using BAPI)..could you please share the code
Thanks a lot

Query: how to use structure and selection and what's the difference between

Query: how to use structure and selection and what's the difference between these two?
Would be appreciated if some experts here give examples to demenstrate on how to use structure and selection in query and what's the difference between these two?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Kevin,
1. Well by default all the KF that you include in your query go into a Key Figure Structure. You can additionally have another structure for defining how your chars are laid out. A common example is a Calmonth structure where you have selections for 12 months, quarers and YTD values. This would be a char structure with different selections (for each month, qtr etc)
2. Yes, a selection with a KF is the same as restricting a KF. You can use am RKF is you have one on the left hand side, or if you need to do this locally in the query, right click the structure and choose New Selection, then proceed to choose your KF and reqd char values.
Hope this helps...

How to convert structures defined in VC++ to Labview

hi
I am converting a previously written VC++ code to labview ...
but i m facing a problem ... ie ... in VC++
typedef struct
float X,Y,Z;
int X2,Y2;
}Position;
in VC++ , if i hv to assign a value to structure.I use pointer to structure so as to give value to each individual variable...
but as far as labview is concerned how to create structure & assign value to it directly ...
is creating structure same as creating clusters in labview ?
& how to assign value to it ? is thr any thing like pointer's in labview ?
I am using Labview 8.0..
waiting in anticipation ...
reply asap... thanking u for ur support...
regards
Yogan

Let me see if I understand correctly: you have a 12-bit signed value, stored in a 16-bit value, and you want it sign-extended through 16 bits? I think there are easier ways to do this in both LabVIEW and C. Here's one idea:

How to set structure in execution method of background callable objec

I need to set input and output parameters in execution method .
But how to set structure and substructure in background callable object

Hi,
you can look here for an example of how to create a background callable object:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/82/0e6f4132f15b58e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm">Implementing Callable Objects for Background Execution</a>.
Here you can find general explanation about how to construct any type of callable object using the GP API: <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/44/7a094edb0b6573e10000000a11466f/frameset.htm">Creating Callable Objects</a>.
In the documents, check the description concerning parameters structure.
I hope that helps:)
Regards, Petja

Explain How to use Structure mapping button

Hi All
Iam Developing an application "Implementing and Using Exceptions in Guided Procedures"
Can you please explain How to use Structure mapping button,
Plz give me steps in details
Thanks
Srinivas

Hi
Create a project using 0020 as method.
Max

How can a structured frame be used for translating books to foreign languages?

I keep reading about how a structured approach can improve the translation process (from english to foreign languages), however, i can't seem to find specifics about a particular method or tutorials about how to go about it (specifically). My question is, how (specifically) can structured framemaker be used for translation from english to foreign languages? Links to tutorials on this issue would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

@Ian Proudfood
A well organized XML based project will definitely save translation costs. There are many advantages to the XML approach to translation management including:
Almost zero DTP rework costs - make the EDD/Template do all of the work!
Translation is application version independent - no need to wait for the Translation Memory/CMS system vendor to support the latest version of FrameMaker.
»... a well organized XML based project will definitively save translation costs.« – I have read sentences like this from a lot of consultants. And I have consulted/supported a lot of customers after those consultants left the stage. I always hear more or less the same from all of those clients. No question, I hear a lot of arguments for working with XML in tech doc, most of the arguments you mention included. Most of the tech writers are happy with the new structured FrameMaker and enjoy writing. And, cross your heart: Finally there's no alternative to XML in the long term if you take your tech writer job seriously. No question – working with pure XML in a professional information architecture in a structured, guiding editing environment like FrameMaker is cool, fun, faster and produces more open, more accessible, more reusable, more reliable, more consistent, in a nutshell: more valuable data.
But what I have never ever heard, and I'm talking about several hundred companies, is: We save more money on translation now. You might imagine that this is surprising me since many years. This is why I always ask: Did you save any costs in your translation projects? Surprisingly the answer is always: No. Actually some – no, wait: many – tell me, that their translation agency even charges more now, because they have a lot of new costs:
Costs, to customize their translation memory system to the clients custom xml,
costs to follow badly or not documented changes in the client's xml structure (DTD/Schema changes) in the TMS,
costs because of more engineering work like
valididating xml in advance,
fixing invalid xml exports,
fixing invalid translations due to – sometimes massively – increased amount of tag errors because of tagging differences of "old" (legacy mif) and "new" (xml) tags,
dealing with just too big XML files that need to be carefully split, so that the TMS has a chance to read it, or alternatively:
"glue" the ten-thousand xml "snippets" to more handy chunks,
project managers and translators that need to do additional checks, validations, verifyings - and often not knowing what to do with those cryptic error messages, meaning additional support costs
Of course, many if no all of these and many other problems I did not mention here can be solved. And many are not exactly system immanent problems but communication problems (like introducing or renaming elements/attributes but not documenting this and not communicating this to the translation service provider) or would apply to any system change (e.g. also when switching from Word to Frame). However, I do not know of any single translation company on this planet (and I know virtually thousands of them from countries all over the world) that reduced the price per word for just a single pence, just because the client switched over from Word/Quark/FrameMaker/InDesign/Whatever to XML.
Just ask your translation service provider: Will you charge me less per word if I send you XML instead of MIF? I would really be surprised to hear a "yes". And frankly, if you have ever compared a professional FrameMaker document with the same document in xml format in a professional system like Trados: There is actually no difference that would justify any price difference. The text is the same, the amount of words identical, the number of tags is identical, it even looks identical in the translation system (I can post screenshots if you like). From the translation perspective there is no single reason why a translator should charge a single pence less.
So, it's a modern myth, that switching to xml reduces translation costs. That might be true, if you come from a really medieval documentation szenario with MS Word or the like, with manual formatting without any styles and so on (I see tech docs every day where even the TOC is typed in manually!!!) and swith from there to a modern structured xml authoring in combination with other supporting tools like authoring memory / authoring assistance, controlled language, translation memory and terminology managent and control, snippet based content management and so on. That will increase the consistency and quality of your data, which will reduce translation costs in the long term. But the truth is: This has nothing to do with XML per se, but with professional writing and professional management.
So, what's left in the money saving story? No more DTP in the target languages? I always hear, that with XML and FrameMaker you do not have to "format" the translated document. The truth is: If you have a professionally formatted (unstructured) document, you don't have to take care of it, too. Modern tools like Trados keep 100% of the formatting 100% correct in the translated document. If the underlying template is intelligent enough to take account of text amount changes due to longer translations, and if you don't have too many local formatting overrides, the DTP is actually zero and can be reduced to a few mintes/hours for "flying" of the document to check out for unexpeted problems wich can occure in both structured and unstructured documents.
Just to give some numbers on this: We are processing every day technical documentations for a quite big company. A typical documentation from them is about 250 pages in unstructured FrameMaker 9 (source language is English). Until now they were resistent to all my XML pushing. The Documentation is based on a straight, simple template (with our help "reduced to the max") and there are no formatting overrides (a script automatically checks this). The post translation Quality Assurance effort is - depending on the target language - usually something between 1 to 4 hours – that's a few seconds per page for the languages where already a lot of past Quality Assurance Steps went back into the Translation Memories and up to a minute per page for more "problematic" languages).
So, again: XML will not save you a single pence on translations. But it might help you to produce more open, more accessible, more reusable, more reliable, more consistent, in a nutshell: more valuable data. But if you already have properly set up (ustructured) FrameMaker Documents and already work with a professional translation memory system, you will be quite disappointed to learn, that the impressive money saving promises you recently saw on that great PowerPoint slides melt down to a few bucks over a couple of years.
Kind regards,
Stefan Gentz

How to print structural design of OM structure

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for