How to properly load balance between diffrent server farms.

Hi experts,
We are using an ACE 4710. We chose for our server farms to load balance using the least_connections predictor. it seems to work fine inside the same server farm but is it working properly between server farms? It doesn't seem because some of my real servers seems to be more loaded than others. Each server farm are using the same real servers.
Any idea about what is the problem or any suggestion regarding the best load balancing predictor we should use using this kind of configuration?
Thank's to all.

The ACE uses load-balancing algorithms or predictors to determine how to balance the traffic among the devices configured in the server farms, independent of the device type. For FWLB, we recommend that you use only the hash address source and the hash address destination predictors. Using any other predictor with FWLB may fail and block traffic, especially for applications that have separate control and data channels.
Here is the configuration guide for the Cisco ACE 4700 Series Appliance Server Load-Balancing.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA1_7_/configuration/slb/guide/fwldbal.html

Similar Messages

Load balancing between application server and database

Hi,
is there any load balancing between the application server and the database? Consider we have a single instance of an application server that sends database queries from different clients to the database. Are the requests queued in some way at the application server, allowing to control the flow of the queries (e.g. queries from "more important" clients might be sent with a higher priority)?
Thanks for your help!

Hi Victor/Jim/Volker,
Thanks a lot for all the responses..
Just wanted to let you guys know that my installation finished successfully.
The thing which confused me was that my Qtime, Qdate and everything else was showing correct values..
Well, my problem I set the environmental variable PASE_TZ to the EST time zone on a SYS level using WRKENVVAR>F4>SYS and added the variable. I logged off and the sidofr logged off, but one user which should have logged off and didn't was the "SAPINST"(my installation user) which was logged in the subsystem TMKSVR00.
Even when I had closed the SAPINST installlation program, the user doesn't log off...it just sits there until and unless u shut him out of the system using the option 4 on wrkactjob for ending the JOB(SAPINST logged in the system below the TMKSVR00 subsystem)
So since the SAPISNT user never logged of, his environmental variables were not initilized properly, even after the changes...
This thought came to me almost after a 6 hours of wasting my time searching for notes here and there...
I think when u end/stop the install in SAPINST, the SAPINST user should log off the AS400 system, but I have noticed, it never does...although when u restart the installation, if u have noticed it shows you the log on for the SAPINST user in the TMKSVR screen...
Its kind of buggy, I would say...
I have noticed, that even when I log on to AS400 from home or from a remote PC using Emulator, it shows me logged in the subsystem and even after i have logged of, it still shows me there...
Anyway, thanks a lot guys...for all your responses..
Just wanted to let you know all.
Thanks
Abhi

Load-Balancing between Foreign and two Anchors

Hi, we have two foreign controllers (one active, one standby) and two anchor controllers. All APs are connected to the active foreign controller. The layer 3 networks for the wlan clients on both anchors are different for the same SSID. SSID: Internet, anchor 1: Subnet A, anchor 2: Subnet B. So when a client is getting anchored to Anchor 1, the clients will get an ip from subnet A and when the client is getting anchored to anchor 2, the client will get an ip from subnet B.
This is so far not a big problem because we only have a few accesspoints in some rooms. But what will happen, when we have a full covered wlan and the client roams from one AP to the other AP? Is there a possibility, that the client will anchored to a different anchor while roaming? I think this will result in a lack of connectivity because without a real disconnect the client will not ask for a new IP address.
Other question: Is it possible to disable this load-balancing between anchor controllers? Or can i make a client sticky to only one anchor as long as an access-session is established?
All controllers are 5760 with 3.3.3 software.

Hi acontes,
It's an interesting question.
In this case, if all AP's are on WLC-A and there is no possibility that an L3 inter-subnet roam will occur between WLC-A and WLC-B, I would just forward WLC-A to Anchor A and WLC-B (in the event of fail over) to Anchor B (if Anchors reside on different subnets). If you must specify Anchor A and Anchor B on each WLC for redundancy purposes, it's important to understand the guidelines and limitations with regard to Foreign / Anchor Design.
As Scott mentioned, the limitation with Anchoring design is that there is no primary / secondary configuration for an Anchor on the Foreign WLC.
If WLC-A has two entries (1) for Anchor-A and (2) for Anchor-B, the EoIP tunnels are establish and load-balancing occurs in a round robin fashion.
Keep in mind the following with regard to guest N+1 redundancy:
•A given foreign controller load balances wireless client connections across the list of anchor controllers configured for the guest WLAN. There is currently no method to designate one anchor as primary with one or more secondary anchors.
•Wireless clients that are associated with an anchor WLC that becomes unreachable are re-associated with another anchor defined for the WLAN. When this happens, assuming web authentication is being used, the client is redirected to the web portal authentication page and required to re-submit their credentials.
Since traffic is transported at Layer 2 via EoIP, the first point at which DHCP services can be implemented is either locally on the anchor controller or the controller can relay client DHCP requests to an external server. Since the IP address directly correlates to the DMZ subnet or the interface where the traffic egresses, it is possible for some clients to get IP's from both Subnet A or Subnet B in the event that WLC-A is building EoIP to both anchors.
1) What happens if my clients roam?
Nothing... since all AP's are on WLC-A, it's Intra-Controller Roaming
Each controller supports same-controller client roaming across access points managed by the same controller. This roaming is transparent to the client as the session is sustained, and the client continues using the same DHCP-assigned or client-assigned IP address. The controller provides DHCP functionality with a relay function. Same-controller roaming is supported in single-controller deployments and in multiple-controller deployments.
Would it be better to choose the same DHCP Pool on both anchors?
It's probably better to have redundant anchors on the same subnet, but it's not required.
3) How would you design this :-)
WLC-A <--EoIP--> Anchor A (DHCP Pool A)
WLC-A <--EoIP--> Anchor B (DHCP Pool A)
It's important to remeber what Scott mentioned about the lack of a primary / secondary relationship. If multiple controllers are added as mobility anchors for a particular WLAN on a foreign controller, the foreign controller internally sorts the controller by their IP address. The controller with the lowest IP address is the first anchor. For example, a typical ordered list would be 172.16.7.25, and 172.16.7.28. If the first client associates to the foreign controller's anchored WLAN, the client database entry is sent to the first anchor controller in the list, the second client is sent to the second controller in the list, and so on, until the end of the anchor list is reached. The process is repeated starting with the first anchor controller.
If any of the anchor controller is detected to be down, all the clients anchored to the controller are deauthenticated, and the clients then go through the authentication/anchoring process again in a round-robin manner with the remaining controller in the anchor list. This functionality is also extended to regular mobility clients through mobility failover. This feature enables mobility group members to detect failed members and reroute clients.

SAP GLM Print Request - Load Balancing of WWI server

Hi GLM Experts,
I am using new GLM + module that generates labels based on Print Requests. I am unable to understand how I can load balance the WWI services when there are multiple label printing requests.
In GLM + we associate a WWI to a Print Station and which can then be associated with a printer. So in the configuration we are tying up a printer a WWI.
Also during label printing, if the scenario uses print request module, then the use need to select a print station and printer. What happens if the WWI related to the print station is down?
For example I have two services in WWI server GENPC1 and GENPC2. I created WWII and WWI2 as two print stations. I will associate my printer PRNWWI to both the print stations WWI1 and WWI2.
During label printing if the user picks and WWI1 and Printer PDNWWI and if the GENPC1 WWI server assocaited with print status WWI1 is busy and down I want WWI GENPC2 to generate the label?
How to setup the above load balancing or fall back? Please let me know.
Thanks
Pugal

Dear Pugal
we are not using GLM + and I am not sure about the technqiue used there to handle load balancing. Regarding general WWI setup I assume you know this Note: EH&amp;S: Availability and performance of WWI and Expert servers
On the top there is a further SAP Note abvailable which might be of interest. This is referenced here:
http://de.scribd.com/doc/191576739/011000358700000861002013-e
May be check OSS note: 1958655; OSS Note 1155294 is more related to normal WWI stuff; but may be check it as well. May be 1934253 might help better
May be this might help.
C.B.
PS: may be check as well: consolut - EHS_MD_140_01 - EH&amp;S-Management-Server einrichten
The load balancing of synchron WWi servers is donein the "RFC" layer, therefore you have no inffluence here, for asynchron WWI servers you can do a lot to manage the WWI load balancing by using "exits" etc.

Round robin DNS for load balancing between multiple network adapters (Xserve)

I'm attempting to use 'round robin' DNS to load balance between the two ethernet adapters of an Xserve.
Both ethernet adapters are connected to the same LAN and have static IP addresses of 192.168.2.250 and 192.168.2.251.
The DNS zone for the server's local domain/host (macserver.private) has a machine record with both IP addresses (set up in the Lion Server UI).
Having read up on round robin DNS, I would have expected DNS requests for 'macserver.private' to be answered with the two IP addresses ordered at random, achiving my aim of requests being served at random via each ethernet adapter.
However this doesn't seem to be the case. Doing a 'nslookup' from any of the network clients results in the two IP addresses being listed in the same order everytime. And pinging 'macserver.private' only ever results in a response from the same address.
Does anyone know why this is the case? Does Lion Server use a non-standard DNS configuration? Are there any additional settings I need to configure in Lion's DNS server to make adopt a round robin approach to responding to requests?
Thanks in advance for any help!

Be careful what you wish for
Round Robin DNS is rarely the best option for 'load balancing'. At the very least it's subject to caching at various point on the network - even at the client side, once the client looks up the address it will cache that response - this means that subsequent lookups may be served from the client's cache and not refer back to the server. Therfore any given client will always see the same address until the cache expires.
I suspect this is what you're seeing.
You can minimize this by setting a lower TTL on the records. This should result in the response being cached for a shorter period, meaning the client will make more requests to the server, with a higher change of using the 'other' address.
However, you're also going to run into issues with the server having two interfaces/addresses in the same LAN. This isn't recommended.
As Jonathon mentioned, you may be better off just bonding the two interfaces. This will provide an automatic level of dynamic load balancing without the latency of DNS caches, as well as automatic failover should one link fail (as opposed to round robin DNS which will cause 50% of requests to fail until the client cache expires and a new lookup is performed (and, even then, there's still a chance the client will try to use the failed link).

Load balancing 2 DNS server

how to configure the CSS to load balance 2 DNS server ?

first configure the services like this :
service dns1
ip address x.x.x.x
active
service dns2
ip address x.x.x.x
active
Then configure the content rule
owner mycompany
content dns
vip address x.x.x.x
add service dns1
add service dns2
active
Then we need to setup something for the dns answer
group dns
vip address x.x.x.x !!!!! same as for the content rule
add service dns1
add service dns2
portmap disable
The portmap disable requires software 5.03(33) or above.
The command is also in 5.01
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps789/prod_release_note09186a00800ba0c6.html

Question about load balancing between Portal and ABAP

Hi,
I have the problem whit load balancing between Portal and ECC (ERC) ABAP
Exist two system:
1) ECC (ERP) ABAP = Backend Module = HR
2) EP (JAVA) = Frontend
The users (9000 users) logon in the EP and run query (data personal) in the ECC. The problem to all user connect in Central Instance and not in the Dialog Instance.
How can balancing the conecction HTTP (EP) to ECC (ABAP)??
I need balancing in the ECC to Dialog Instance

Jco -> right. Another possibility is that you use iviews that point to the backend in this case you will need to use a load balanced entry for the backend system in the [system landscape|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/47/8c1e438d7017fce10000000a42189c/frameset.htm] -> SAP_R3_LoadBalancing
If you have ESS deployed on your portal, you will most probably need to do both.
Cheers Michael

Distributed Queue - Unable To Load Balance Between Each Time A Send Method Is Called

Hi,
          According to the JMS documentation, I should be able to get the
          distributed queue to load balance
          between each time the message producer calls Message.send(). I was not
          able to achieve this, however,
          I noticed the load balancing happens when a JMS client is stopped and
          restarted (meaning totally
          exit the JVM and restart the JVM).
          Here is my configuration:
          WLS 8.1 SP2 on XP
          One cluster with two nodes (running on the same machine w/ different port)
          Each node hosts one JMS server, which hosts one physical queue and using
          JDBC store
          One distributed queue with two physical members from each of the JMS
          server.
          JMS Connection Factory is configured with "Load Balancing Enabled" set to
          yes,
          and "Server Affinity Enabled" to no. This connection factory is target to
          the cluster.
          The queue session for the queue sender is created with transaction setting
          to false.
          Any hints and ideas would greatly appreciated.
          Here is the content of config.xml:
          ========================================================================
          <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
          <Domain ConfigurationVersion="8.1.0.0" Name="odh">
          <Cluster ClusterAddress="localhost:8001,localhost:9001"
          MulticastAddress="237.0.0.1" Name="odhCluster_1"/>
          <Server ListenAddress="" ListenPort="7001" Machine="localhost"
          Name="odhAdmin" NativeIOEnabled="true" ServerVersion="8.1.2.0">
          <SSL Enabled="false" HostnameVerificationIgnored="false"
          IdentityAndTrustLocations="KeyStores" Name="odhAdmin"/>
          </Server>
          <Server Cluster="odhCluster_1" ExpectedToRun="false"
          IIOPEnabled="false" ListenAddress="" ListenPort="8001"
          Machine="localhost" Name="odhManagedServer_1"
          NativeIOEnabled="true" ServerVersion="8.1.2.0">
          <SSL Enabled="false" IdentityAndTrustLocations="KeyStores"
          Name="odhManagedServer_1"/>
          <ExecuteQueue Name="weblogic.kernel.Default" ThreadCount="15"/>
          </Server>
          <Server Cluster="odhCluster_1" ExpectedToRun="false"
          IIOPEnabled="false" ListenAddress="" ListenPort="9001"
          Machine="localhost" Name="odhManagedServer_2"
          NativeIOEnabled="true" ServerVersion="8.1.2.0">
          <SSL Enabled="false" IdentityAndTrustLocations="KeyStores"
          Name="odhManagedServer_2"/>
          <ExecuteQueue Name="weblogic.kernel.Default" ThreadCount="15"/>
          </Server>
          <MigratableTarget Cluster="odhCluster_1"
          Name="odhManagedServer_1 (migratable)"
          Notes="This is a system generated default migratable target for a
          server. Do not delete manually."
          UserPreferredServer="odhManagedServer_1"/>
          <MigratableTarget Cluster="odhCluster_1"
          Name="odhManagedServer_2 (migratable)"
          Notes="This is a system generated default migratable target for a
          server. Do not delete manually."
          UserPreferredServer="odhManagedServer_2"/>
          <Machine Name="localhost">
          <NodeManager ListenAddress="localhost" Name="localhost"/>
          </Machine>
          <JMSConnectionFactory AcknowledgePolicy="All"
          DefaultDeliveryMode="Persistent"
          JNDIName="com.neoforma.ConnectionFactory"
          Name="odhConnectionFactory" ServerAffinityEnabled="false"
          Targets="odhCluster_1" XAConnectionFactoryEnabled="true"/>
          <JMSDistributedQueue JNDIName="com.neoforma.odhDistributedQueue_1"
          LoadBalancingPolicy="Round-Robin" Name="odhDistributedQueue_1"
          Targets="odhCluster_1">
          <JMSDistributedQueueMember JMSQueue="odhQueue_1"
          Name="DistributedQueueMember_1"/>
          <JMSDistributedQueueMember JMSQueue="odhQueue_2"
          Name="DistributedQueueMember_2"/>
          </JMSDistributedQueue>
          <JMSJDBCStore ConnectionPool="odhMessagePool"
          Name="odhJMSJDBCStore_1" PrefixName="Order1_"/>
          <JMSJDBCStore ConnectionPool="odhMessagePool"
          Name="odhJMSJDBCStore_2" PrefixName="Order2_"/>
          <JMSServer Name="odhJMSServer_1" Store="odhJMSJDBCStore_1"
          Targets="odhManagedServer_1">
          <JMSQueue CreationTime="1076439896999"
          JNDIName="com.neoforma.odhQueue_1" Name="odhQueue_1"
          StoreEnabled="true"/>
          </JMSServer>
          <JMSServer Name="odhJMSServer_2" Store="odhJMSJDBCStore_2"
          Targets="odhManagedServer_2">
          <JMSQueue CreationTime="1076439664343"
          JNDIName="com.neoforma.odhQueue_2" Name="odhQueue_2"
          StoreEnabled="true"/>
          </JMSServer>
          <JDBCConnectionPool
          DriverName="oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXADataSource"
          Name="odhConnectionPool" Password="...."
          Properties="user=..." Targets="odhCluster_1"
          TestTableName="SQL SELECT 1 FROM DUAL" URL="................."/>
          <JDBCConnectionPool DriverName="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver"
          Name="odhMessagePool" Password="....."
          Properties="user=....." Targets="odhCluster_1"
          TestTableName="SQL SELECT 1 FROM DUAL" URL="............."/>
          <JDBCMultiPool AlgorithmType="High-Availability"
          Name="odhJDBCMultiPool_1"
          PoolList="odhConnectionPool,odhMessagePool"
          Targets="odhCluster_1"/>
          <JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit="false"
          JNDIName="com.neoforma.order.orderDS" Name="odhJDBCDataSource_1"
          PoolName="odhConnectionPool" Targets="odhCluster_1"/>
          <Security Name="odh" PasswordPolicy="wl_default_password_policy"
          Realm="wl_default_realm" RealmSetup="true"/>
          
          <Realm FileRealm="wl_default_file_realm" Name="wl_default_realm"/>
          <FileRealm Name="wl_default_file_realm"/>
          <PasswordPolicy Name="wl_default_password_policy"/>
          <Application Deployed="true" Name="odh.ear"
          Path="D:\bea\user_projects\domains\odh\applications\odh.ear"
          StagedTargets="odhManagedServer_1,odhManagedServer_2"
          StagingMode="stage" TwoPhase="true">
          <EJBComponent Name="odh.jar" Targets="odhCluster_1" URI="odh.jar"/>
          </Application>
          <StartupClass ClassName="com.neoforma.startup.JMXMBeanStartup"
          DeploymentOrder="1" Name="ODH MBean Startup Class"
          Notes="ODH MBean Startup Class - Note" Targets="odhAdmin"/>
          <EmbeddedLDAP
          Credential="{3DES}YFY55/dsdxI9HL/AKGRXHuR1VwyJewNFdAHdrtk/WMM="
          Name="odh"/>
          <SecurityConfiguration
          Credential="{3DES}ZCPa1Bsrj3z2DhVKVUbq32zTYipDVff+LDB9+1b2Dr4VLhz5yjZyHgPheqS/kum4VVZamDYN07Hyb6rALiCTHhwt1EzK5+M+"
          Name="odh" RealmBootStrapVersion="1"/>
          </Domain>


Thanks for the Makiey. I am surprise that BEA hasn't come back with any
          info.
          Hien
          On 7 Jul 2004 01:51:01 -0700, makiey <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          > Hi Hien Luu,
          >
          > We also have a problem with load balancing, tested with WLS 7.0 SP4 and
          > WLS 8.1
          > SP2 (HP UX). The only "working" configuration is load-balancing policy =
          > random
          > (CF deployed to cluster, load balancing enabled, affinity disabled).
          > With the
          > "round-robin" policy we cannot utilize more than 50% dis. queue's
          > members.
          >
          > I'm trying to prepare a reproducer...
          >
          > greetings,
          > makiey
          >
          >
          > "Hien Luu" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >> Hi,
          >>
          >> According to the JMS documentation, I should be able to get the =
          >>
          >> distributed queue to load balance
          >> between each time the message producer calls Message.send(). I was not
          >> =
          >> =
          >>
          >> able to achieve this, however,
          >> I noticed the load balancing happens when a JMS client is stopped and
          >> =
          >>
          >> restarted (meaning totally
          >> exit the JVM and restart the JVM).
          >>
          >> Here is my configuration:
          >>
          >> WLS 8.1 SP2 on XP
          >> One cluster with two nodes (running on the same machine w/ different
          >> por=
          >> t)
          >> Each node hosts one JMS server, which hosts one physical queue and
          >> using=
          >> =
          >>
          >> JDBC store
          >> One distributed queue with two physical members from each of the JMS
          >> =
          >>
          >> server.
          >> JMS Connection Factory is configured with "Load Balancing Enabled" set
          >> t=
          >> o =
          >>
          >> yes,
          >> and "Server Affinity Enabled" to no. This connection factory is target
          >> =
          >> to =
          >>
          >> the cluster.
          >>
          >> The queue session for the queue sender is created with transaction
          >> setti=
          >> ng =
          >>
          >> to false.
          >>
          >> Any hints and ideas would greatly appreciated.
          >>
          >>
          >> Here is the content of config.xml:
          >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
          >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
          >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
          >>
          >> <?xml version=3D"1.0" encoding=3D"UTF-8"?>
          >> <Domain ConfigurationVersion=3D"8.1.0.0" Name=3D"odh">
          >> <Cluster ClusterAddress=3D"localhost:8001,localhost:9001"
          >> MulticastAddress=3D"237.0.0.1" Name=3D"odhCluster_1"/>
          >> <Server ListenAddress=3D"" ListenPort=3D"7001" Machine=3D"localhost=
          >> "
          >> Name=3D"odhAdmin" NativeIOEnabled=3D"true" ServerVersion=3D"8.1=
          >> .2.0">
          >> <SSL Enabled=3D"false" HostnameVerificationIgnored=3D"false"
          >> IdentityAndTrustLocations=3D"KeyStores" Name=3D"odhAdmin"/>=
          >>
          >> </Server>
          >> <Server Cluster=3D"odhCluster_1" ExpectedToRun=3D"false"
          >> IIOPEnabled=3D"false" ListenAddress=3D"" ListenPort=3D"8001"
          >> Machine=3D"localhost" Name=3D"odhManagedServer_1"
          >> NativeIOEnabled=3D"true" ServerVersion=3D"8.1.2.0">
          >> <SSL Enabled=3D"false" IdentityAndTrustLocations=3D"KeyStores"
          >> =
          >> =
          >>
          >> Name=3D"odhManagedServer_1"/>
          >> <ExecuteQueue Name=3D"weblogic.kernel.Default" ThreadCount=3D"1=
          >> 5"/>
          >> </Server>
          >> <Server Cluster=3D"odhCluster_1" ExpectedToRun=3D"false"
          >> IIOPEnabled=3D"false" ListenAddress=3D"" ListenPort=3D"9001"
          >> Machine=3D"localhost" Name=3D"odhManagedServer_2"
          >> NativeIOEnabled=3D"true" ServerVersion=3D"8.1.2.0">
          >> <SSL Enabled=3D"false" IdentityAndTrustLocations=3D"KeyStores"
          >> =
          >> =
          >>
          >> Name=3D"odhManagedServer_2"/>
          >> <ExecuteQueue Name=3D"weblogic.kernel.Default" ThreadCount=3D"1=
          >> 5"/>
          >> </Server>
          >> <MigratableTarget Cluster=3D"odhCluster_1"
          >> Name=3D"odhManagedServer_1 (migratable)"
          >> Notes=3D"This is a system generated default migratable target
          >> f=
          >> or a =
          >>
          >> server. Do not delete manually."
          >> UserPreferredServer=3D"odhManagedServer_1"/>
          >> <MigratableTarget Cluster=3D"odhCluster_1"
          >> Name=3D"odhManagedServer_2 (migratable)"
          >> Notes=3D"This is a system generated default migratable target
          >> f=
          >> or a =
          >>
          >> server. Do not delete manually."
          >> UserPreferredServer=3D"odhManagedServer_2"/>
          >> <Machine Name=3D"localhost">
          >> <NodeManager ListenAddress=3D"localhost" Name=3D"localhost"/>
          >> </Machine>
          >> <JMSConnectionFactory AcknowledgePolicy=3D"All"
          >> DefaultDeliveryMode=3D"Persistent"
          >> JNDIName=3D"com.neoforma.ConnectionFactory"
          >> Name=3D"odhConnectionFactory" ServerAffinityEnabled=3D"false"
          >> Targets=3D"odhCluster_1" XAConnectionFactoryEnabled=3D"true"/>
          >> <JMSDistributedQueue JNDIName=3D"com.neoforma.odhDistributedQueue_1=
          >> "
          >> LoadBalancingPolicy=3D"Round-Robin" Name=3D"odhDistributedQueue=
          >> _1" =
          >>
          >> Targets=3D"odhCluster_1">
          >> <JMSDistributedQueueMember JMSQueue=3D"odhQueue_1" =
          >>
          >> Name=3D"DistributedQueueMember_1"/>
          >> <JMSDistributedQueueMember JMSQueue=3D"odhQueue_2" =
          >>
          >> Name=3D"DistributedQueueMember_2"/>
          >> </JMSDistributedQueue>
          >> <JMSJDBCStore ConnectionPool=3D"odhMessagePool"
          >> Name=3D"odhJMSJDBCStore_1" PrefixName=3D"Order1_"/>
          >> <JMSJDBCStore ConnectionPool=3D"odhMessagePool"
          >> Name=3D"odhJMSJDBCStore_2" PrefixName=3D"Order2_"/>
          >> <JMSServer Name=3D"odhJMSServer_1" Store=3D"odhJMSJDBCStore_1"
          >> =
          >>
          >> Targets=3D"odhManagedServer_1">
          >> <JMSQueue CreationTime=3D"1076439896999"
          >> JNDIName=3D"com.neoforma.odhQueue_1" Name=3D"odhQueue_1"
          >> =
          >>
          >> StoreEnabled=3D"true"/>
          >> </JMSServer>
          >> <JMSServer Name=3D"odhJMSServer_2" Store=3D"odhJMSJDBCStore_2"
          >> =
          >>
          >> Targets=3D"odhManagedServer_2">
          >> <JMSQueue CreationTime=3D"1076439664343"
          >> JNDIName=3D"com.neoforma.odhQueue_2" Name=3D"odhQueue_2"
          >> =
          >>
          >> StoreEnabled=3D"true"/>
          >> </JMSServer>
          >> <JDBCConnectionPool
          >> DriverName=3D"oracle.jdbc.xa.client.OracleXADataSource"
          >> Name=3D"odhConnectionPool" Password=3D"...."
          >> Properties=3D"user=3D..." Targets=3D"odhCluster_1"
          >> TestTableName=3D"SQL SELECT 1 FROM DUAL" URL=3D"...............=
          >> .."/>
          >> <JDBCConnectionPool DriverName=3D"oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver"
          >> Name=3D"odhMessagePool" Password=3D"....."
          >> Properties=3D"user=3D....." Targets=3D"odhCluster_1"
          >> TestTableName=3D"SQL SELECT 1 FROM DUAL" URL=3D"............."/=
          >>>
          >> <JDBCMultiPool AlgorithmType=3D"High-Availability"
          >> Name=3D"odhJDBCMultiPool_1"
          >> PoolList=3D"odhConnectionPool,odhMessagePool" =
          >>
          >> Targets=3D"odhCluster_1"/>
          >> <JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit=3D"false"
          >> JNDIName=3D"com.neoforma.order.orderDS" Name=3D"odhJDBCDataSour=
          >> ce_1"
          >> PoolName=3D"odhConnectionPool" Targets=3D"odhCluster_1"/>
          >> <Security Name=3D"odh" PasswordPolicy=3D"wl_default_password_policy=
          >> "
          >> Realm=3D"wl_default_realm" RealmSetup=3D"true"/>
          >> 
          >> <Realm FileRealm=3D"wl_default_file_realm" Name=3D"wl_default_realm=
          >> "/>
          >> <FileRealm Name=3D"wl_default_file_realm"/>
          >> <PasswordPolicy Name=3D"wl_default_password_policy"/>
          >> <Application Deployed=3D"true" Name=3D"odh.ear"
          >> Path=3D"D:\bea\user_projects\domains\odh\applications\odh.ear"
          >> StagedTargets=3D"odhManagedServer_1,odhManagedServer_2"
          >> StagingMode=3D"stage" TwoPhase=3D"true">
          >> <EJBComponent Name=3D"odh.jar" Targets=3D"odhCluster_1" URI=3D"=
          >> odh.jar"/>
          >> </Application>
          >> <StartupClass ClassName=3D"com.neoforma.startup.JMXMBeanStartup"
          >> DeploymentOrder=3D"1" Name=3D"ODH MBean Startup Class"
          >> Notes=3D"ODH MBean Startup Class - Note" Targets=3D"odhAdmin"/>=
          >>
          >> <EmbeddedLDAP
          >> Credential=3D"{3DES}YFY55/dsdxI9HL/AKGRXHuR1VwyJewNFdAHdrtk/WMM=
          >> =3D" =
          >>
          >> Name=3D"odh"/>
          >> <SecurityConfiguration
          >> Credential=3D"{3DES}ZCPa1Bsrj3z2DhVKVUbq32zTYipDVff+LDB9+1b2Dr4=
          >> VLhz5yjZyHgPheqS/kum4VVZamDYN07Hyb6rALiCTHhwt1EzK5+M+"
          >> Name=3D"odh" RealmBootStrapVersion=3D"1"/>
          >> </Domain>
          >
          Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Load balancing on RMI Server Application

Hi there, I'd like to know more detail about load balancing on RMI server application, been digging the web for some time, but couldn't find much information, does anyone know any website or has the knowledge of load balancing on RMI to share? Sort like its design and implementation.
Thanks,
Jax

I want performance and fault-tolerance,
In that case, is it necessary to have a main
rmi server to allow client to access and pick one of
the rmi servers for the client?Well, if you have one main RMI server, you have a single point of failure again.. Why can't your application know about all rmi servers, and randomly choose one? If it's down, pick a different one.. If your applicatoin is an applet, you'll have to sign it.. Do that and put it on 2 redundant web servers. You have performance by splitting the load and you have your fault tolerance by having x identical rmi servers.
If you're saying what I think, why would you have one main rmi server that picks a different rmi server? That's more work AND your redundancy goes byebye, ie if your main rmi server dies..

Load balancing between two routers

I have two routers connected through the LAN connection. The first one is using as routing protocol EIGRP, the other one is part of the managed service and I do not have access to it. I would like to make a load balancing between the two of them by redistributing the static routes in EIGRP. When I tried this, I am loosing the EIGRP entry for this route in the routing table. I would like to have both of them , so we could have traffic sharing. I appreciate if you give me any hints.

Raju,
you have two choices as far as I can see. If you want to use static routing over the WAN to your branch, you could duplicate your static routes to the branch and point them to the secondary router. You will have two identical sets of static routes in the primary router, one set pointing to the WAN interface and the other one pointing to the secondary router.
ip route x.x.x.x "WAN-interface"
ip route x.x.x.x "secondary router"
ip route y.y.y.y "WAN-interface"
ip route y.y.y.y "secondary router"
etc.
As a result the primary router will have two routes to the branch and will load-balance. If one next-hop fails (either the WAN interface or the secondary router), only the other will be used. If the next-hop comes back up, load-balancing will resume.
The other choice would be to use EIGRP over the WAN, and make sure the two routers become EIGRP neighbors. Then you can use the "variance" command to achieve unequal cost load-balancing between the two routers. Let me know if you need more information about this, but i think static routes will be sufficient in your situation.
HTH, Thomas

Load balancing between Instance for same external IP client

Hi,
I have a azure website which is single tenant and is going to be used inside a single Domain from same region.
Now my website provide good performance till 20 concurrent request. I want to scale this so that it can reach up to 30 - 40 -100 so on.
What are the options available to achieve this. till now what i have figured out is that
1. If i increase the web site instance or on the auto scale option. It load balances between the instances on the basis of Client external I.P. but in my case all the users which are using the site shares the same external IP.
I have tested it increasing the instances doesn't make any impact on my performance results.
2. I have also looked in traffic manager but that case is valid when the clients are on different GeoLocations which is also not valid in my case.
So my basic Question is if i have a pool of different scenarios where
100 users uses 1 azure website
200 uses uses 1 azure website
1000 users uses 1 azure website
what infra should i take for each website to support this have performnace same as 100 users.
Whenever you see a reply and if you think is helpful,Vote As Helpful! And whenever you see a reply being an answer to the question of the thread, click Mark As Answer

Hi,
I would request you to configure Web hosting plan and check if it helps in increasing the performance.
It gives a set of features and capacity that you can share across your websites separately.
http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/azure-web-sites-web-hosting-plans-in-depth-overview/
Regards,
Azam Khan

How to to make Cluster between two server 2012 Datacenter with share storage and Hyper-V role then install Exchange 2013 on each server datacenter then make DAG between Exchange servers

Dears,
I have IBM Flex server with built in storage,
HOW to to make Cluster between two server 2012 Datacenter with share storage and Hyper-V role then install Exchange 2013 on each server datacenter then make DAG between Exchange servers?
If there any prerequisites of the Share storage types ?and any configuration guide to deploy Cluster between two Server 2012 datacenter ?

Microsoft Failover Clusters require shared storage. If you wish to create a failover cluster with local storage, you need to use third party software to mirror the disks and present it to the hosts (siog.com, datacore.com, starwind.com). If you
use third party software, you will need to follow their instructions for configuring the environment.
Questions on how to configure Exchange environments are better asked in an Exchange forum.
.:|:.:|:. tim

Load balancing between two interfaces on 2811

Hi,
We have a 2811 router with VPN and NAT configured. We have two internet connection from different ISPs. The speed of our original connection is 2MB up and down. The speed of our new connection is 1MB up and down. We want to configure load balancing between the two connections. Our new ISP has provided us with a CISCO 837 router. We want to connect that router into our 2811 on one of the free WIC card and then configure load balancing between the two interfaces on our 2811. The third interface has a local address configured. Please suggest where to start. I tried searching on net for any configuration example but I was unable to find any particular example with commands. I am new on CISCO platform. Any help will be hugely appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Raju,
you have two choices as far as I can see. If you want to use static routing over the WAN to your branch, you could duplicate your static routes to the branch and point them to the secondary router. You will have two identical sets of static routes in the primary router, one set pointing to the WAN interface and the other one pointing to the secondary router.
ip route x.x.x.x "WAN-interface"
ip route x.x.x.x "secondary router"
ip route y.y.y.y "WAN-interface"
ip route y.y.y.y "secondary router"
etc.
As a result the primary router will have two routes to the branch and will load-balance. If one next-hop fails (either the WAN interface or the secondary router), only the other will be used. If the next-hop comes back up, load-balancing will resume.
The other choice would be to use EIGRP over the WAN, and make sure the two routers become EIGRP neighbors. Then you can use the "variance" command to achieve unequal cost load-balancing between the two routers. Let me know if you need more information about this, but i think static routes will be sufficient in your situation.
HTH, Thomas

How to set up load balancing with overload server on css

can anyone tell me how to set up a load balancing config on css that will enable me to LB proxy caches and when they have too many connections then LB against an overload proxy-cache.
Such that when the normal proxy-cache farm is under the ceiling of max connections then the overload server is not used ?
I don't think redirect or sorry server will do this ?

see the below configuration,any question,just tell me.
service proxy-1
! below is the real ip of server
ip address 10.1.1.1
keepalive type icmp
active
service proxy-2
ip address 10.1.1.2
keepalive type icmp
active
! enter owner config-mode
owner proxy
! define a content rule,match what you want to load balancing
content rule-proxy
! below is virtual ip,it can be another ip segment
vip address 10.1.1.50
add service proxy-1
add service proxy-2
protocol any
advanced-balance sticky-srcip
active

How do I load balance TFTP between two servers and a client on the same subnet?

Hi,
I have trawled through several documents and tried umpteen different configs, all to no avail. I have a PXE boot client trying to access a boot file via TFTP from a couple of TFTP servers on the same VLAN/subnet. For HA purposes I want to load balance the two TFTP servers.
Config is currently;
=====
probe icmp ICMP_PROBE
description icmp probe for default gateway tracking
interval 5
passdetect interval 15
rserver host server1
description Server1
ip address 10.0.0.1
inservice
rserver host server2
description Server 2
ip address 10.0.0.2
inservice
serverfarm host serverfarm_01
description servers used
probe ICMP_PROBE
rserver server1
    inservice
rserver server2
    inservice
class-map match-all L4_VIP_TFTP
10 match virtual-address 10.0.0.10 udp eq 69
policy-map type loadbalance first-match L7_TFTP
class class-default
    serverfarm serverfarm_01
policy-map multi-match L4_LB_VIP_POLICY
class L4_VIP_TFTP
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy L7_TFTP
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
nat dynamic 1 vlan 200
interface vlan 200
ip address 10.0.0.250 255.255.255.0
nat-pool 1 10.0.0.241 10.0.0.243 netmask 255.255.255.255 pat
service-policy input L4_LB_VIP_POLICY
no shutdown
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.254
=====
I have read the doco by Ivan Kovacevic amongst many others but as my clients and servers are on the same subnet, the config doesnt work.
Can anybody point me in the right direction please. The devices are ACE 4710 running A3(2.3).
Thanks

Try using the following configuration:
Note: Please make sure to configure also a udp probe to probe udp port 69, in case the application is down.
You need to configure a management policy on the interface when using a UDP probe.
That is because, when port 69 on the server will be unreachable, the server will send an ICMP unreachable.
ACE will consider a udp probe as "failed" only when it sees ICMP unreachable.
Without a management policy-map, the ICMP unreachable message will be dropped.
Also, add an ICMP probe to the rserver because udp probe will not be enough when the physical interface will be down.
That is because UDP is a connection-less protocol. To consider a UDP probe successfull, ACE need to see NO answer from the server in respose to the probe.
The ACE will not see any answer from the server when the interface is down and thus, will consider the probe as "sucessful".
With ICMP probe attached to the rserver, you also test the reachability of the server and not only the UDP port.
Here is the configuration (of course, you can chage the names of the of the objects to the name you are using if you want) :
access-list ALL line 10 extended permit ip any any
probe udp TFTP
port 69
interval 5
passdetect interval 15
probe icmp ICMP_PROBE
interval 5
passdetect interval 15
rserver host TFTP_1
ip address 10.0.0.1
probe TFTP
probe ICMP_PROBE
inservice
rserver host TFTP_2
ip address 10.0.0.2
probe TFTP
probe ICMP_PROBE
inservice
serverfarm host TFTP-SFARM
rserver TFTP_1
    inservice
rserver TFTP_2
    inservice
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source TFTP-STICKY
timeout 10
replicate sticky
serverfarm TFTP-SFARM
class-map type management match-any MANAGE
2 match protocol icmp any
class-map match-all NAT
2 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 udp any
class-map match-all TFTP
2 match virtual-address 10.0.0.10 udp eq 69
policy-map type management first-match MANAGE
class MANAGE
    permit
policy-map type loadbalance first-match ROUTE
class class-default
    forward
policy-map type loadbalance first-match TFTP-POL
class class-default
    sticky-serverfarm TFTP-STICKY
policy-map multi-match TFTP-MULTI
class TFTP
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy TFTP-POL
    nat dynamic 1 vlan 212
class NAT
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy ROUTE
    nat dynamic 2 vlan 212
interface vlan 212
ip address 10.0.0.250 255.255.255.0
no normalization
access-group input ALL
nat-pool 1 10.0.0.241 10.0.0.243 netmask 255.255.255.0 pat
nat-pool 2 10.0.0.10 10.0.0.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 pat
service-policy input TFTP-MULTI
service-policy input MANAGE
no shutdown
Let me know how it goes.
Good luck!

How to properly load balance between diffrent server farms.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for