How to resolve illegal cross join error

Can someone please tell me how can we avoid illegal cross join error in modeling? If someone has any reference document , please share it.
I have 5 tables - Dim (A, B , C,E) and Fact( D). C is lookup table which is used to resolve the lookup code column in table E.
The relationships between these are
A--< B--< E >--C
& A--<D
My requirement is i have to expose Attributes of A,B ,C & E within Dimension.
These attributes (from B,C,E) will be treated as property of A.
Someone may query these attributes without selecting any column from fact table.
Thanks & Regards,
Ashish

Hi Ashish,
it's not the first time you come up with this kind of question and I'm wondering if you understand the principle of granularity when I read your questions.
On physical level, a fact table must always join with the lowest level of detail of your dimension table. Let me explain, by giving an example which looks like your situation.
Assume I have three tables:
Table "E" contains products, which has attributes like: product_id and product_name
Table "B" contains order line items, which has attributes like: order_line_item_id, order_id and product_id.
Table "A" contains orders, which has attributes like: order_id and customer_name.
Table "D" contains facts ("metrical data") about my order: which has attributes like: order_id, order_revenue.
This will be the diagram on physical level: E--<B--<A--<D
Here are my joins: E.product_id on B.produc_id, B.order_id on A.order_id, A.order_id--<D.order_id
Now, my question to you is: will I be able to get the revenue of a certain product?
The answer is: No, because I don't know what part of my order is spent on a certain product. The problem is thus that the data in the fact table isn't stored on that level of detail, or in other words the fact and dimension table don't share the same level of granularity.
How it should be:
If you want to get the revenue per product, you will need to have a second fact table "G", which has data which is stored on order line item level. This table contains the following attributes: order_line_item_id, product_id and order_line_item_revenue.
This will become your diagram on physical level:
B--<G>--E
Joins: B.order_line_item_id on G.order_line_item_id and E.product_id on G.product_id
Table E has become a dimension of fact table G.
The first physical diagram should look like this:
A--<D
If you want you can model both physical diagrams into one logical diagram, assuming that A and D (order dimension and fact table) are aggregates of B and G (order line items dimension and fact table). In that case you should read this blog item: http://obiee101.blogspot.com/2008/11/obiee-making-it-aggregate-aware.html
Regards,
Stijn

Similar Messages

  • [nQSError: 14065] Illegal cross join

    I am getting the following the following error “[nQSError: 14065] Illegal cross join” in the following situation.
    We have one dimension table Called “WC_CUSTOMER_D” and in that table we are storing 2 row_wids one to store the “Status Wid” (data comes from WC_LOV_D) and “Risk Wid” (again data comes from WC_LOV_D) of the customer . We have 2 alias table as Dim_Status_WC_LOV_D and Dim_Risk_WC_LOV_D and it joins to the Dim_WC_CUSTOMER_D .
    In Logical we have one Logical table “Dim Customer” and has 3 Logical table source (reason is we can write content level filters ) for the each dimension tables. We exposed some attributes from the Dim_WC_CUSTOMER_D, Dim_status_WC_LOV_D and Dim_Risk_WC_LOV_D tables.
    In answer , We are getting the illegal cross join error when we expose fields from 2 WC_LOV_D alias tables
    Error comes only if we use alias of same physical type more than once
    Query Status: Query Failed: [nQSError: 14065] Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect subject area setup: [
    WC_CUSTOMER_D T624599,
    WC_LOV_D T624699] with [
    WC_LOV_D T628734]
    But when I add a fact , BI is able to build a query
    select T624599.SOURCE_SYSTEM as c1,
    T624699.LOOKUP_CODE as c2,
    T628734.LOOKUP_CODE as c3,
    count(distinct T623979.CUST_ACCT_WID) as c4
    from
    WC_LOV_D T628734 /* Dim_Risk_WC_LOV_D_ */ ,
    WC_LOV_D T624699 /* Dim_Staus_WC_LOV_D */ ,
    WC_CUSTOMER_D T624599 /* Dim_W_CUSTOMER_D */ ,
    WC_CUSTOMER_F T623979 /* Fact_WC_CUSTOMER_F */
    where ( T623979.CUST_FIN_PROFL_WID = T624599.ROW_WID and T624599.X_ACCOUNT_STATUS_WID = T624699.ROW_WID and T624599.X_RISK_CODE_WID = T628734.ROW_WID and T628734.LOOKUP_TYPE = 'RISK' and T624699.LOOKUP_TYPE = 'STATUS' )
    group by T624599.X_ SOURCE_SYSTEM, T628734.LOOKUP_CODE, T624699.LOOKUP_CODE
    order by c1, c2, c3
    Please guide me if I did some mistake or any work around for this issue.
    Thanks
    Barna

    Hi,
    Maybe you have already resolved this issue. In any case, I found a solution following instructions in support note ID 1329237.1.
    Best regards,
    Cristina

  • Illegal cross join within the same dimension

    Hi,
    When certain fields are selected within the presentation table an "illegal cross join" error is returned by the BI Server. However if a FACT is added from one of the other presentation tables the "illegal cross join" error goes away. we need to query without fact column.
    We are getting following error
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 14065] Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect subject area setup: [ CALL_CENTER.COUNSELOR_MANAGER T782130] with [ CALL_CENTER.COUNSELOR_HR T781594 On CALL_CENTER.COUNSELOR_HR.MASTER_STAFF_COUNSELOR_ID = CALL_CENTER.MASTER_STAFF_COUNSELOR.MASTER_STAFF_COUNSELOR_ID, CALL_CENTER.MASTER_STAFF_COUNSELOR T781739] (HY000)
    Can anybody help me solving this issue.
    Thanks,
    KS.

    Please give us an example of what you need.
    OBIEE perform a query in the dimension or through the fact table.
    You can't join two dimensions in the repository without going through a fact table.
    If you need to query without fact column, it's because you have design two dimensions where
    normally you can do one.
    You have then two solutions :
    * change the design of your logical model to make only one dimension.
    * use the OBIEE logical SQL in answer.
    http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/obiee/bi_server/design/obiee_logical_sql
    Success
    Nico

  • Getting Error : Illegal cross join within the same dimension

    Hi All,
    At database there are 4 tables - XLE_Entity_profiles (A) , XLE_ETB_profiles (B) ,XLE_Registration (C),XLE_Reg_Function(D) .
    Attribute info is as below -
    A.Le_name
    B.LRU_name
    C. Registraton name
    D. Function_code
    I have to model a single dimension which contains the attributes from these tables and dimension should also support queries which contains attributes from this dimension only without selecting any fact.
    For Exp - query is as below -
    Le_name,Le-Registraton name,Le_Function_code,LRU_name,LRU_Registraton name,LRU_Function_code
    To support such query , i created aliases of table XLE_Registration,XLE_Reg_Function.
    Aliases names are - XLE_Registration_LE (E),XLE_Registration_LRU (F),XLE_Reg_Function_LE (G).,XLE_Reg_Function_LRU (H)
    Attributes from aliases are as below -
    XLE_Registration_LE- Le-Registraton name
    XLE_Registration_LRU -LRU_Registraton name
    XLE_Reg_Function_LE - Le_Function_code
    XLE_Reg_Function_LRU - LRU_Function_code
    i have renamed the attributes For LE and LRU.
    The Physical layer diagram is as below
    A < B
    E F
    G H
    [A:B (1:M) , A:E(1:M), E:G(1:M),B:F(1:M),F:H(1:M)]
    At logical layer , i have created a dimension DIM-LE with below logical table sources -
    A ,B,E,F,G,H
    Using the properties of LTS B , i mapped B to A.
    Using the properties of LTS E , i mapped E to A.
    Using the properties of LTS F , i mapped F to B.
    Using the properties of LTS G , i mapped G to E.
    Using the properties of LTS H , i mapped H to F.
    Now when i run the query , i am getting the error -
    Query - Le_name,Le-Registraton name,Le_Function_code,LRU_name,LRU_Registraton name,LRU_Function_code
    +++Administrator:2a0000:2a0004:----2008/11/07 19:39:03
    Query Status: Query Failed: [nQSError: 14065|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/] Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect subject area setup: [
    XLE_REGISTRATIONS T1218 On XLE_REGISTRATIONS_LRU.REGISTRATION_ID = XLE_REG_FUNCTIONS_LRU.REGISTRATION_ID,
    XLE_REG_FUNCTIONS T5737,
    XLE_ETB_PROFILES T900 On XLE_ETB_PROFILES.ESTABLISHMENT_ID = XLE_REGISTRATIONS_LRU.SOURCE_ID,
    XLE_ENTITY_PROFILES T836 On XLE_ENTITY_PROFILES.LEGAL_ENTITY_ID = XLE_ETB_PROFILES.LEGAL_ENTITY_ID] with [
    XLE_REGISTRATIONS T1155 On XLE_REGISTRATIONS_LE.REGISTRATION_ID = XLE_REG_FUNCTIONS_LE.REGISTRATION_ID,
    XLE_REG_FUNCTIONS T5703,
    XLE_ENTITY_PROFILES T836 On XLE_ENTITY_PROFILES.LEGAL_ENTITY_ID = XLE_REGISTRATIONS_LE.SOURCE_ID]
    But when i run below query,which resembles the BI Answer query, against the database ,
    select distinct A.NAME as c1,
    B.REGISTERED_NAME as c2,
    E.Function_code as c5,
    C.NAME as c3,
    D.REGISTERED_NAME as c4,
    F.Function_code as c6
    from
    XLE_ENTITY_PROFILES A,
    XLE_REGISTRATIONS B,
    XLE_REG_FUNCTIONS E,
    XLE_ETB_PROFILES C,
    XLE_REGISTRATIONS D,
    XLE_REG_FUNCTIONS F
    where (A.LEGAL_ENTITY_ID = C.LEGAL_ENTITY_ID and
    A.LEGAL_ENTITY_ID = B.SOURCE_ID and
    C.ESTABLISHMENT_ID = D.SOURCE_ID and
    B.SOURCE_TABLE = 'XLE_ENTITY_PROFILES' and
    D.SOURCE_TABLE = 'XLE_ETB_PROFILES' and
    E.Registration_id = B.Registration_id and
    F.Registration_id = D.Registration_id)
    order by c1, c2,c5, c3, c4,c6
    i don't get any error.
    Please let me know , why am i getting this error and how can i resolve this issue?

    Hi All,
    Is there any update on this ?
    Thanks,Ashish

  • Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect subject ar

    hi!
    Imagine the following BMM:
    There is one Logical Dimension Table "Service Account" with the following LTS:
    - LTS "D_SERVICE"
    - LTS "D_SERVICE_CLASS"
    - LTS "D_SERVICE_STATUS"
    This Logical Tabe "Service Account" joins (One-to-many) with several Fact Tables (other Logical Tables).
    In the Physical Layer the joins for the "Service Account" LTS are:
    - One-to-many between D_SERVICE_CLASS and D_SERVICE
    - One-to-many between D_SERVICE_STATUS and D_SERVICE
    The problem is that when I build a report in Answers using only the following columns of the Logical Table "Service Account":
    - Service Class Desc (which exists in the Logical Table "Service Account" and in the Physical Table D_SERVICE_CLASS)
    - Service Status Desc (which exists in the Logical Table "Service Account" and in the Physical Tabl D_SERVICE_STATUS)
    - MSISDN (which existis in the Logical Table "Service Account" and in the Phsyical Table D_SERVICE)
    the following error appears:
    Estado: HY000. Código: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 14065] Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect subject area setup: [ (select * from prd.D_SERVICE where SOURCE_SYS in ('ARBOR','PPB') and DW_SERV_ST_ID in (100000003,100000009)) as T1836, D_SERVICE_CLASS T1916] with [ D_SERVICE_STATUS T1948] (HY000)
    SQL emitido: SELECT "SERVICE ACCOUNT"."TLC MSISDN9" saw_0, "SERVICE ACCOUNT"."IWS Service Class Desc" saw_1, "SERVICE ACCOUNT"."TLC Service Status Desc" saw_2 FROM "VFPT - Upgrade Siebel" WHERE "SERVICE ACCOUNT"."TLC MSISDN9" = '917330340' ORDER BY saw_0, saw_1, saw_2
    Help, please!
    Thanks.

    Physically, only D_SERVICE is joined to the facts. Then D_SERVICE_CLASS is joined to D_SERVICE (one-to-many) and D_SERVICE_STATUS is joined also to D_SERVICE (one-to-many).
    In the BMM, there is only one Logical Dimension Table for those 3 physical tables. This Logical Dimension Table is called "Service Account" and has 3 LTS: D_SERVICE, D_SERVICE_CLASS, D_SERVICE_STATUS. The Logical Dimension Table has several logical columns that are associated to those 3 LTS: SERVICE_KEY, SERVICE_CLASS_KEY, SERVICE_STATUS_KEY, SERVICE_MSISDN, SERVICE_CLASS_DESC, SERVICE_STATUS_DESC.
    The Logical Dimension Table "Service Account" is then joined to a fact table (one-to-many).
    I didn't understand the suggestion about the 3 LTS... Aren't we doing that already? Can you explain it better, please?
    thanks.

  • [nQSError: 14065] Illegal cross join within the same dimension

    Hey guys,
    I'm stumped. I have two dimension tables that are joined 1:N (there is NOT an M:N relationship between them) and I have them joined in the Physical Layer and the Business Model and Mapping Layer. The two tables are F4101 (the "1") and F4102 (the "N") in the 1:N relationship. F4102 then joins to a fact table, and F4101 joins to NOTHING else. So I don't believe I have a circular condition or a need for a bridge table. Both tables are published to the Presentation Layer for reporting.
    The error occurs in Answers when I want to do something as trivial as display the three primary key columns together from F4101: F4101.col1, F4101.col2, F4101.col3 (all three make up the PK). When I do that, the following error occurs:
    "nQSError: 14065] Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect subject area setup: [ F4101 T28761] with [ F4102 T1805] "
    What I can't figure out is WHY the F4102 table is listed in this error. I didn't try to report on it at all. See the logical SQL below from my query:
    "SQL Issued: SELECT "Item Master (F4101)".IMITM saw_0, "Item Master (F4101)".IMLITM saw_1, "Item Master (F4101)".IMAITM saw_2 FROM "Sales Analysis" ORDER BY saw_0, saw_1, saw_2"
    As soon as I take out one of the three PK columns and add in another non-PK column from F4101, it works just fine. And reporting on each of the three PK columns individually works as well in Answers.
    Any ideas? I would greatly appreciate it.
    Thanks.

    Try this;
    1. In the logical layer, create one folder called F4101_F4102.
    2. Map both F4101 and F4102 as logical table sources in that folder.
    3. Join from the folder F4101_F4102 to the fact using a Logical (new complex join) join.
    Chris.

  • Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect subject.

    Hello Gurus,
    I am getting this error for one calculated column in OBIEE 11G
    Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect subject area setup. *[ WC_PC_POSITION_D AS Dim_WC_PC_POSITION_D] with [ W_GL_ACCOUNT_D AS Dim_W_GL_ACCOUNT_D On Dim_W_GL_ACCOUNT_D.ROW_WID = Fact_WC_PC_BUDGET_DTLS_F.GL_ACCOUNT_WID, WC_PC_BUDGET_DTLS_F AS Fact_WC_PC_BUDGET_DTLS_F] (HY000)*
    the same column is calculated in OBIEE 10G and it's giving fine result.
    the way it's calculated in BMM is we are using 2 different logical table's column for deriving new column.
    is anyone having any idea?
    Thanking You..

    More Specially,
    Physical Layer:
    Dim:View1,View2,View3,View4
    Fact:View5
    all Views are PK joined in Phsical layer.
    So I need all columns in 3 Views and few column in View4.
    In BMM :
    Dim:View1,View2,View3
    Fact:View 5
    are joined and created LTS in View3 for LTS View4 and dropped few coulmns and mapped the columns.
    In reports,
    If I pull the columns from View3 which is came from view4 then getting the error.
    I hope does it make sense.
    Please help on this.

  • Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect

    Hi,
    I created a logical table from 2 different Physical tables. Then I created a Dimension out of this logical table.
    At the BI Answer, while I tried drilling on the dimension, I get the following error:
    “Illegal cross join within the same dimension caused by incorrect subject area setup “
    Please let me know if there is any work around this issue.
    Thanks,

    I think that OBIEE try to do a cross join but don't allow it
    http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dw/join/cross_join
    It generate surely a join with two tables where you don't have any condition or relation in the physical layer.
    When you check the column from the subject area are you sure that you have a condition in the physical layer for the two tables ?
    When you say "I tried drilling on the dimension", does it means that you have a report and when you click on link which come from a dimension level, it doesn't work ?
    Regards
    Nico

  • How to resolve the dump Syntax error in program /1BCWDY/824VCAJI0ED4WMLLJ7N

    I have created 4 components and I have linked them to a single web dynpro application component through an interface.
    This is working fine in development.
    When we moved all these objects to quality and when i run the application it is opening the default component. However when i try to call any other component it is giving the following dump.
    Syntax error in program /1BCWDY/824VCAJI0ED4WMLLJ7NV==CP.
    When we debugged we found that this dump is arising in the CREATE COMPONENT method.
    Please suggest how to resolve this issue.

    Hi,
    Using the method prepare_dynamic_navigation i am calling all the components.
    After this method i have written the following code for deleting the active and create the new component.
    Delete the active componet if any before bind the called component
      IF wa_cmp_usage-component_usage->has_active_component( ) IS NOT INITIAL.
        wa_cmp_usage-component_usage->delete_component( ).
      ENDIF.
    Bind the compont called to this main component
      wa_cmp_usage-component_usage->create_component( lv_target_comp ).     -
    > when i debug, inside this am getting dump.
    In ST22 the error is occuring in the following place.
      call method (l_gen_class_name)=>if_wdr_classloader~create_instance
        receiving
          component_instance = me->component_factory.
    I am actually 5 components. The default and the fifth components are only having tab and a text view. There are no other UI elements. These two components are working.
    The remaining components are having many UI elements and these components are giving the above said dumps.
    Edited by: Mohamed Aslam on May 13, 2010 12:11 PM

  • Could you please tell me how to resolve the following import error? Thanks.

    Hi,
    When run the following command to import two tables:SPSSDMRESPONSE_LOG and SPSSSCORE_LOG, there are some error in the log. Could you please tell me how to resolve these error? Thanks.
    Command:
    imp S3SLORL10/[email protected] file=/yhan/subTables.dmp ignore=y tables=SPSSDMRESPONSE_LOG,SPSSSCORE_LOG
    There are some error in the log file.
    The log file is:
    Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    Export file created by EXPORT:V10.02.01 via conventional path
    import done in US7ASCII character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
    import server uses AL32UTF8 character set (possible charset conversion)
    export client uses WE8MSWIN1252 character set (possible charset conversion)
    . importing S3SLORL10's objects into S3SLORL10
    . importing S3SLORL10's objects into S3SLORL10
    IMP-00061: Warning: Object type "S3SLORL10"."Info224_T" already exists with a different identifier
    "CREATE TYPE "Info224_T" TIMESTAMP '2011-09-21:06:54:13' OID 'A1F8D176EF2949"
    "07882153DE7E4CC9F9' AS OBJECT ("SYS_XDBPD$" "XDB"."XDB$RAW_LI"
    "ST_T","Response" "Response225_COLL","Property" "ModelOutput223_COLL")FINAL "
    "INSTANTIABLE "
    IMP-00063: Warning: Skipping table "S3SLORL10"."SPSSDMRESPONSE_LOG" because object type "S3SLORL10"."Info224_T" cannot be created or has different identifier
    IMP-00061: Warning: Object type "S3SLORL10"."Metric214_COLL" already exists with a different identifier
    "CREATE TYPE "Metric214_COLL" TIMESTAMP '2011-09-20:09:56:02' OID '98999BF48"
    "84F4BAB81D391109E4BB823' AS VARRAY(2147483647) OF "nameValueT"
    "ype208_T""
    IMP-00063: Warning: Skipping table "S3SLORL10"."SPSSSCORE_LOG" because object type "S3SLORL10"."Metric214_COLL" cannot be created or has different identifier
    IMP-00017: following statement failed with ORACLE error 942:
    "ANALYZE TABLE "SPSSDMRESPONSE_LOG" ESTIMATE STATISTICS "
    IMP-00003: ORACLE error 942 encountered
    ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
    IMP-00017: following statement failed with ORACLE error 942:
    "ANALYZE TABLE "SPSSSCORE_LOG" ESTIMATE STATISTICS "
    IMP-00003: ORACLE error 942 encountered
    ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
    Import terminated successfully with warnings.

    *Import of table containing object type(s) fails with IMP-00061 IMP-00063 [ID 203822.1]*
    in short: search for the TOID_NOVALIDATE parameter

  • How to resolve the runtime portal error which occurs during entering a room

    Hi All
    I have created a room of type "Sap_Team_Room" and then assigned it to one role when i am trying to enter room it is giving me the following error
    "Portal Runtime Error
    An exception occurred while processing a request for :
    iView : pcd:portal_content/com.sap.ip.collaboration/Rooms/80dd2995-e186-2a10-c58f-d9411ca9c30e/workset/com.sap.netweaver.coll.DocumentsAndLinks_0_0/RoomQuickLaunch
    Component Name : null
    Page could not create the iView."
    Please Can anybody tell me how to resolve it.
    Thanks in Advance
    Thanks and Regards
    Nishita Salver

    Hi,
    Have you made any changes in  com.sap.portal.runtime.logon.par ?? because the error specifies error in authschemes computation, this means authschemes.xml file is not modified if you have modified logon par file. Is this correct??
    Regards,
    Ameya

  • How to resolve database PSU conflict errors

    Hello:
    I am in process of applying the database PSU Patch 18522512 for 11.2.0.3 and running into conflict issues with other patches, please take a look at the following conflict issues and let me know how to resolve these conflict issues and installed the PSU patch 18522512.
    /cherdb_1/oracle/VIS12/11.2.0/PATCHES/PSU/18522512
    cheron.aarcorp.com:(oracle):> opatch apply
    Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.2.0.3.6
    Copyright (c) 2013, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.
    Oracle Home       : /cherdb_1/oracle/VIS12/11.2.0
    Central Inventory : /vol01/app/oraInventory
    from           : /cherdb_1/oracle/VIS12/11.2.0/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version    : 11.2.0.3.6
    OUI version       : 11.2.0.3.0
    Log file location : /cherdb_1/oracle/VIS12/11.2.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2014-08-06_10-59-59AM_1.log
    Verifying environment and performing prerequisite checks...
    Composite Patch 18522512 is a bug superset of 16929165,16992075,17468141,13001379,14123213,13931044,9858539,8547978,14237793,14207902,13923995,13544396,13528551,13499128,13477790,13466801,13366202,13259364,13070939,13036331,12971775,12845115,12780983 in OH.
    Composite Patch 18522512 conflicts with installed patch(es) 17875948, 16040940, 19078951, 17693770, 17912217, 13004894, 14649883, 12942119, 16438289, 13040331, 17600719, 13146719, 18116376
    Conflict Description:
    Here are the specific sub-patches of composite patch 18522512 that conflict with 17875948, 16040940, 19078951, 17693770, 17912217, 13004894, 14649883, 12942119, 16438289, 13040331, 17600719, 13146719, 18116376
    Sub-Patch 13696216 conflicts with 19078951 conflicts with 18116376
    Sub-Patch 13923374 conflicts with 19078951
    Sub-Patch 16056266 conflicts with 19078951
    Sub-Patch 16619892 conflicts with 19078951 conflicts with 17912217 conflicts with 17875948 conflicts with 17600719 conflicts with 16438289 conflicts with 13004894
    Sub-Patch 16902043 conflicts with 19078951 conflicts with 17875948 conflicts with 12942119 conflicts with 13146719 conflicts with 13040331
    Sub-Patch 17540582 conflicts with 19078951 conflicts with 17693770 conflicts with 14649883
    Sub-Patch 18031683 conflicts with 19078951 conflicts with 17875948
    Sub-Patch 18522512 conflicts with 19078951 conflicts with 16040940
    Conflict Remedy:
    Refer to My Oracle Support Note 1299688.1 for instructions on resolving patch conflicts.
    UtilSession failed: Composite conflicts with existing oneoffs.
    Log file location: /cherdb_1/oracle/VIS12/11.2.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2014-08-06_10-59-59AM_1.log
    OPatch failed with error code 73
    Thanks & appreciated for your help.
    Syed.

    Hi Syed,
    You can raise SR for merging the conflict patches and refer to the MOS document provided to resolve.
    Thanks,
    Uday

  • How to resolve security sandbox violation (Error#2148) in Flex 3 on XP?

    Hi,
    When I tried to access an image on c:\ (on XP), I get the following error:
    *** Security Sandbox Violation ***
    Connection to file:///C:\DBFiles\3.jpg halted - not permitted from http://localhost/test-debug/test.swf
    -- Remote SWFs may not access local files.SecurityError: Error #2148: SWF file http://localhost/ullmanphp-debug/ullmanphp.swf cannot access local resource file:///C:\DBFiles\INDSprintOrgChart.pptx\3.jpg. Only local-with-filesystem and trusted local SWF files may access local resources.
    at flash.display::Loader/_load()
    at flash.display::Loader/load()
    It looks like some sort of mismatch on security settings. I have done the following so far (based on what I got by googling....)
    1. Flex comipler setting additional compiler arguments:  -use-network=false
    2. I have added a crossdomain.xml on the source directory with these lines...
    <site-control permitted-cross-domain-policies="master-only"/>
    <allow-access-from domain="*"/>
    <allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="SOAPAction"/>
    However, error is still appearing. How do I fix this for testing on my local machine. I cannot move to a webserver at this time.
    Thanks!.

    How do I set Security.sandboxType related to flash player? When I try to see it in my application through debugger it says "remote". I think I need to set it to one of the following from the adobe manual pages...
    Security.sandboxType has one of the following values:
    remote (Security.REMOTE)—This file is from an Internet URL and operates under domain-based sandbox rules.
    localWithFile (Security.LOCAL_WITH_FILE)—This file is a local file, has not been trusted by the user, and it is not a SWF file that was published with a networking designation. The file may read from local data sources but may not communicate with the Internet.
    localWithNetwork (Security.LOCAL_WITH_NETWORK)—This SWF file is a local file, has not been trusted by the user, and was published with a networking designation. The SWF file can communicate with the Internet but cannot read from local data sources.
    localTrusted (Security.LOCAL_TRUSTED)—This file is a local file and has been trusted by the user, using either the Flash Player Settings Manager or a FlashPlayerTrust configuration file. The file can read from local data sources and communicate with the Internet.
    application (Security.APPLICATION)—This file is running in an AIR application, and it was installed with the package (AIR file) for that application. By default, files in the AIR application sandbox can cross-script any file from any domain (although files outside the AIR application sandbox may not be permitted to cross-script the AIR file). By default, files in the AIR application sandbox can load content and data from any domain.
    Any input on how to set it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

  • How to resolve Tuxedo 6.5 error  getting on the new HP-Itanium server

    Hi guys,
    We had tuxedo 6.5 installed on old server which is HP-PA Risc server and Os is HP-UX B11.11.
    Where as we cloned and migrated that file systems related to Tuxedo to new server which is Configured with HP_Itanium and Os HP-Ux B11.23.
    We freshly created Oracle instances with same naming conventions on Old server as Our server is HP-Itanium that oracle files created with .sh extensions.Where as in Old server they were created with .sl extension.While moving file systems from old server to new server we exclude the oracle part.But we moved the Pleopelsoft home location as it was on oldserver.
    But when we try to start application server we are getting the below error
    105549.uhrtest1!PSADMIN.25298: Begin boot attempt on domain UHRTST3APP
    105554.uhrtest1!BBL.25780: 02082010: TUXEDO Version 6.5 HP-UX B.11.00 U 9000/898 1623623321 unlimited-user license.
    105554.uhrtest1!BBL.25780: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting
    105600.uhrtest1!PSAPPSRV.25783: 02082010: TUXEDO Version 6.5 HP-UX B.11.00 U 9000/898 1623623321 unlimited-user license.
    105600.uhrtest1!PSAPPSRV.25783: LIBTUX_CAT:262: INFO: Standard main starting
    105600.uhrtest1!PSAPPSRV.25783: LIBTUX_CAT:250: ERROR: tpsvrinit() failed
    105600.uhrtest1!tmboot.25779: 02082010: TUXEDO Version 6.5 HP-UX B.11.00 U 9000/898 1623623321 unlimited-user license.
    105600.uhrtest1!tmboot.25779: tmboot: CMDTUX_CAT:827: ERROR: Fatal error encountered; initiating user error handler
    105600.uhrtest1!tmboot.25779: NLS:6: Message not found, catalog CMDTUX_CAT, set 1, num 724
    105600.uhrtest1!PSADMIN.25298: End boot attempt on domain UHRTST3APP
    Please let us know the reason behind this and how we can resolve this issue.Your response would be highky appreciatied.
    Thanks,
    Yarli

    Hi,
    The processors are different archiectures and you can not use binaries from one architecture to work on the other.
    Library name suffix differences is an example of the importance of this. Tuxedo 6.5 was separately built for each of those architectures and
    is available on the PeopleSoft distribution as distinct binaries. If your migration was purely from HPUX11.11 to HPUX11.23 you might have
    succeeded but the processor difference will not work for you and a core dump would not be unexpected.
    Bob Finan
    FYI:
    Tuxedo 6.5 is end-of-lifed and, since it's EOL has passed the stage for extended support possibility, no new patches will
    be created for it by engineering. You should look to migrate to a newer version of Tuxedo/Peoplesoft at the earliest
    possiblity.

  • How to resolve SQLVDI and SQLWRITER errors

    I'm getting these errors whenever I run windows backup on I get these errors for each of the six SQL databases. Below are two examples of the errors that I get. This is causing my backups to fail. 
    Log Name: Application
    Source: SQLWRITER
    Date: 7/1/2014 1:18:05 PM
    Event ID: 24583
    Task Category: None
    Level: Error
    Keywords: Classic
    User: N/A
    Description:
    Sqllib error: OLEDB Error encountered calling ICommandText::Execute. hr = 0x80040e14. SQLSTATE: 42000, Native Error: 3013
    Error state: 1, Severity: 16
    Source: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 10.0
    Error message: BACKUP DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
    SQLSTATE: 42000, Native Error: 3271
    Error state: 1, Severity: 16
    Source: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 10.0
    Error message: A nonrecoverable I/O error occurred on file "{A29E5835-30A3-4DA2-89A3-8A9A80196C7E}3:" 995(The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request.).
    SQLSTATE: 01000, Native Error: 4035
    Error state: 1, Severity: 0
    Source: Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 10.0
    Error message: Processed 0 pages for database 'SharePoint_ConfigurationDatabase', file 'SharePoint_ConfigurationDatabase' on file 1.
    Log Name: Application
    Source: SQLVDI
    Date: 7/1/2014 1:18:05 PM
    Event ID: 1
    Task Category: None
    Level: Error
    Keywords: Classic
    User: N/A
    Description:
    SQLVDI: Loc=TriggerAbort. Desc=invoked. ErrorCode=(0). Process=2488. Thread=10456. Server. Instance=SHAREPOINT. VD=Global\{A29E5835-30A3-4DA2-89A3-8A9A80196C7E}7_SQLVDIMemoryName_0.
    Anybody knows what is causing this and how do I resolve these errors.

    Hi,
    What is Service pack of Your SQL Server. Is it patched to latest Service pack. Is your OS patched to latest Service pack. Did you also reffered to Microsoft links I posted in my first reply were they helpful
    >>
    Error message: A nonrecoverable I/O error occurred on file "{A29E5835-30A3-4DA2-89A3-8A9A80196C7E}3:" 995(The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request.).>>
    This message seems seems fatal to me and I have seen this when instance of SQL server or OS is not patched to latest SP. below are couple of related links to read
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2512352
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/934396/en-us
    Can you please post errorlog messages  related to this error. Complete message please.If Service pack does not solves it you might as well consider opening case with Microsoft
    If Service pack does not
    Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it.
    My TechNet Wiki Articles

Maybe you are looking for

  • Looping through inbox items on timer event is really slow...?

    Hi, I have an issue with a email sync event that I am running.  Essentially, I am given a date (the received date of the last email synced) via another process and then need to return all the emails in the user's inbox the where receivedDate > this g

  • Nokia 5230 - Wish List for Next Firmware Upgrade

    heya guys, I'm using Nokia 5230 with the latest firmware, V 12.0.089. The following are my wish list for the next firmware upgrade:- 1. Messaging > Sent Items: Please include short cut icons to Forward, Create New and Delete as in Inbox. 2. Log > Rec

  • ISE 1.2 - Guest Services

    Hi All, I'm planning to setup Cisco ISE - GNAC services and I want to know how the licenses work for this service. Will ISE count a license for each guest user connected? also I have another question regarding WAN latency between personas. What's the

  • How to specify the type of table in the form parameters

    How to specify the type of table in the form parameters. for example, how to specify the type of table "vacancies". FORM getcertainday                    USING                    vacancies TYPE STANDARD TABLE                    efirstday LIKE hrp9200

  • Is it possible to match Lockbox program with MICR and/or Invoice, PO , BOL

    Hi , Could please someone let me know , in Lockbox program whether it's feasible to do the matching with the PO , BOL(Bill of Lading) other than the MICR and/or Invoice? Any help is highly appreciated and rewarded with the points... Thanks