How to restrict the Order TECO wiht out serviceentry sheet / usage Decision

Dear PM Guru's
i am seeking a good solution for the following issue. suppose one external order created, against to this PO created, but maintenance people TECO the order with out creating the service entry sheet. how i can restrict this functionality? please suggest me good solution which is very simplicity. and some of the orders are TECO with out the usage decsion taken against the Inspection lot, here also how i can restrict the TECO the order is there any function module or enhancement to avoid such a mistakes? please guide me and give an good idea to sort out this issue as soon as possible.
thanks in advance to all the PM guru's.
regards
jalu

Hi,
By doing the user exit in IW32 we achieved the requirement of restriction of maintenance order TECO functionality if any Service Entry sheet pending with reference of maintneance order.
regards
JKM

Similar Messages

  • How to restrict the order reason in Tcode Va01 while creating sales order

    Hi Gurus,
    My requirement is
    while creating sales order in VA01
    if order type is Zvol
    than the list of order reasons has to be restricted.
    Now 15 are coming from OVAU  tcode
    I need only 5 from these.
    Thanks & Reagrds
    kals.

    Hi,
    By doing the user exit in IW32 we achieved the requirement of restriction of maintenance order TECO functionality if any Service Entry sheet pending with reference of maintneance order.
    regards
    JKM

  • How to restrict the ordering of apps from within an app

    My grandkids somehow run up charges by ordering apps from within an app they are using usually games  without even knowing they are doing it. How do I restrict them from doing it?  And how do I get the charges to Itunes removed when this happens?

    You can go into settings, and restrictions and turn off 'in app purchases'
    You may also want to set your apple id from 'require after 15 minutes' to 'require immediately'
    As to getting the charges reversed you can contact the app developer. Maybe they will reverse the charges, but they don't have to. The terms of sale are that all sales are final.

  • How to restrict the the oreder reason list while creating sales order

    Hi gurus,
    Can anyone suggest me
    how to restrict the Order rerson list
    while creating the sales order in VA01
    Thanks & Regards
    kalyan.

    hi,
    Try this exit:
    Enhancement            MMFAB001     User exit for generation of release order                    
    Thanks,
    AMS

  • Restrict the Order no Whe we select the Taxable asset in account assignment

    Hi Gurus,
    In the BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI I have implemented a code to populate the default Asset in the et_account table and it is getting reflected in the portal,
    But my issue is the Order no also gets populated based on the default Asset which is happening after the BADI get triggered.
    Please help me how to restrict the Order no getting populated since it is picking up from the table ANLA (R/3), suggest me any BADI to restrict the same.
    Regards
    Paul

    Hi Dave,
    But I need to restrict the Order no getting populated in the portal when we clear the field ET_ACCOUNT-ORDER_NO within the BADI (BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI) then also the Order is getting populated in the portal, suggest us any OSS notes or any other way of doing it.
    Regards
    Dhanoo

  • How tio restrict the generation of Calib.Maint Order for Previous dates

    Dear PM Guru's
    i required one restriction option to prevent the generation of calibration  maintenance orders for previous dates.please under stand the full information in following example.
    one of my gauge frequency was every 6months. for every 6months user wants one calibration order. in between these 6months frequency user checks the gauge for every 1month as a Inspection / verification of gauge. while uploading the data in SAP, user enters the dates 02.02.2011 as  a start of cycle, but we upload the data in sap 02.05.2011. on 05.05.2011 we will go for live. here system should generate the order every month as 02.03.2011,02.04.2011,02.05.2011,02.06.2011,02.07.2011,02.08.2011. As per out condition 02.08.2011 has Inspection / verification and calibration remaining months are inspection / verification. Now here how i can restrict the order generation for 02.03.2011,02.04.2011,02.05.2011dates. Please give me the suggestion and solution to avoid the order generation. if i left same as it is somany orders should be generated.
    please help me. thanks so much in advance to all PM gurus.
    regards
    PM

    First method:
    You can define offset in strategy so that first call will be created after the offset period (in your case, it is 4 months).
    Second method:
    You can define the start date of cycle as 02.05. instead of 02.02, as system is going live only by 05.05.

  • How we restrict the TECO fucntion without service entry sheet for PM03 cont

    Dear PM Guru's.
    one of my client asking to restrict the TECO function if there is no cost in order either by external service cost or internal service cost? If user raise an order for one external activity , he not created the service entry sheet against PO and he did TECO of the order, when FI people settles the cost system showing either order is already settled or there is nothing to settle. Please guide me how to restrict the user to do the teco function in order. Its very crucial and urgent for me. if any one have solution please update it immediately.
    regards
    Jalu

    IWO10004 Maintenance order: Customer check for order completion
    Use the above user exit to check the cost for the order. If there is no cost, then give error message.
    You can check tables PMCO and AUFK.
    Also you can use function module PM_WORKORDER_COSTS_LIST to retrieve the actual cost values.

  • How to restrict the change access in CRM for OLTP orders

    Hi Guru's,
    Please let me know  how to restrict the change access in CRM for the orders that are created in ECC. The ECC orders will only for display in CRM but not for change,
    We have  the orders that are  created in ECC, it will flows to CRM and should restrict the access to get in to the change mode in CRM but as of now CRM  system is allowing change mode for ECC orders and ending up with errors.
    Is there any additional middleware parameter that needs to be added to SMOFPARSFA table to get this functionality! Please advice! Thank your for your help.
    Regards
    Suneel

    Hi.
    You can use the PFCG role to control if the user is able to create, change, delete or only display a business transaction type.
    Regards.

  • How to restrict the GR for Production Order when Goods Issue is not done

    Hi Gurus
    How to restrict the GR for Production Order when all the required components for production order are not issued with all required quantity. Even for partial issue system should not allow GR with 101. The user status with RMWA, RMWF & CGFB is not working.
    Pls suggest best solution.
    Abhijit.

    Hi,
    You can club together the GI nad GR at the time of confirmation..
    I.e Backflush for the components and auto GR for the Product.
    So that you can stream line the Process.
    The best Option would be to use the User Exit:
    Enhancement - MBCF0002
    Functional Module - EXIT_SAPMM07M_001
    Include - ZXMBCU02
    Refer below link for further details..
    How to stop the goods receipt before issueing the goods for production orde
    Regards,
    Siva

  • How to restrict the user from making any changes in Sales order- item level

    Hi to all
    How to restrict the users from making any changes in sales order at item level if the same sales order is released by senior user through status profile.
    Regards
    Anish Parikh
    Edited by: anish parikh on Jan 24, 2008 5:16 AM

    Hi Anish,
    This can be achieved through the roles and authorization.
    This can be done through the basis team. they can create user profiles and roles.
    For the roles they assign some transaction codes so that they can view the only assigned tr. codes.
    Like that ur requirement can be done.
    Also u can prevent the user to change any fields in the sales order screen (VA02). for that please modify the authorisations.
    Hope i answers.
    Reward points if useful.
    Edited by: kaleeswaran bhoopathy on Jan 24, 2008 9:57 AM

  • How to restrict the entry of same material twice on the order

    HI,
    How to restrict the entry of same material twice on the order before saving the Order ?
    I do not want my users to enter the same material as two different line items in the order.
    Any inputs wud b appreciated

    Hi Vam,
    For this you need to take the help of an ABAPer . Ask him to modify the user exit and add the logic.
    For user exit please go through the below link it will help you to resolve your issue.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/1c/f62c7dd435d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
    Regards,
    Krishna O
    Edited by: Krishna O on Jun 3, 2010 12:29 PM

  • Can't remember how to reverse the order of the tracks in a playlist ~ can anyone help  me out?  Thanks.

    Can't remember how to reverse the order of tracks in a playlist.....can anyone help me out?  Thanks.

    Were you able to figure it out?

  • How to restrict the decimal entry on dynamic table in adf 11 .6

    Hi All,
      JDev version 11.6
      I have a usecase based on dynamic VO. How to restrict the decimal numbers on table columns . When user enter the decimal number .I have to show error message.
      In order to achieve above requirement .I have added value change listener on table column .its not working as expected
    <af:table rows="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.rangeSize}"
                      fetchSize="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.rangeSize}"
                      emptyText="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.viewable ? 'No data to display.' : 'Access Denied.'}"
                      var="row" rowBandingInterval="0"
                      value="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.collectionModel}"
                      selectedRowKeys="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
                      selectionListener="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.collectionModel.makeCurrent}"
                      rowSelection="single" id="t1"
                      styleClass="AFStretchWidth" autoHeightRows="-1"
                      columnStretching="last" contentDelivery="immediate" >
              <af:forEach items="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.attributeDefs}"
                          var="def">
                <af:column headerText="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.labels[def.name]}"
                           sortProperty="#{def.name}" id="c1">
                  <af:inputText value="#{row[def.name]}" id="ot1"
                                valueChangeListener="#{backingBeanScope.EmployeeBean.validateINputs}"
                                autoSubmit="true">
                    </af:inputText>
                  <af:outputText value="#{row[def.name]}" id="ot6"
                                 visible="#{def.name eq 'Dummy'}"/>
                </af:column>
              </af:forEach>
            </af:table>
    So appriciate if any alternatives on above usecase. Thanks in advance

    HI
    Expected :as soon as user enter the decimal values in table column , it should throw the error message in new small new window
    Getting the value change listener and validating , but its working only tab out (Because VO is dynamic )
    please suggest us any reg expression and Validators to achieve the above scenario ?

  • How to restrict the job start conditions (only "Immediate" type) ?

    Hi,
    We allow our users to schedule and execute in background mode transactions (example IP19, IW38). We gave them for that authorizations (object S_BTCH_JOB with LIST, PROT, RELE and SHOW - objetct S_PROGRAM with BTCSUBMIT).
    We would like that users can schedule and execute their jobs only with the u201CImmediateu201D job start condition (in the Start Time screen for the type of start condition : Immediate, Date/Time, After job, After event, or At operation mode).
    Another solution: prohibit the scheduling and the execution background job in a certain time interval ...
    How can restrict the job start conditions ?
    Thank you.
    Patrice.

    Hi Jan,
    Yes, sa38 makes it possible indeed to execute in background into immediate mode a job but
    the user have to know the name of the program to be carried out ...
    The user knows only the name of these transactions trade. For example, IW38.
    In the menu of this transaction, SAP gives the possibility to execute in background :
    Program --> Execute in Background --> display of Start Time screen for the type of start condition :
    Immediate, Date/Time, After job, After event, or At operation mode).
    It is at this time there that we want that the user can only choose the "immediate" mode.
    We must thus prohibit the other choices (Date/Time, After job, After event, or At operation mode) ... and
    and we don't know how to restrict these other options in this screen "Start Time screen for the type of start condition".
    Thank you.
    By.

  • How to restrict the department to not user other departments' equipment?

    Dear SAPIENTS,
    How to restrict the department to not user other departments' equipment? If suppose any one creating order for equipment having different authorization group then system should not allow me to do this.
    Regards,
    Kaushal Rai

    Kaushal Rai,
    Use Authorization group for technical objects, create authorization gruops in IMG and assign the same to the Equipment master and block the other department with the same authorization group. For ristricting the authorization group to other departments after creating and assigning it to the equipment seek help from your BASIS team.
    goto the below path for cerating the Authorization group:
    IMG - PMCS - Master data in PMCS - Technical Objects - Define Authorization groups:
    Here you define the authorization groups, after completion of this step go to the Equipment master in General Data tab page there is a feild Authourization Group, mention the respective authorization group and provide this Authorization gruop value to the respective user in the user role with the help of BASIS Team.
    Regards,
    Praveen.

Maybe you are looking for

  • GR check in PO

    hi all, I am using Framework PO along with Invoicing Plan for which i dont want to do MIGO and its working fine ,, but when ever i create purchase order i have to go to delivery tab and unckeck the "Goods Receipt". Now is there a way around in custom

  • For those with battery drain / wifi issues

    Many of you have found a temp fix related to exchange email accounts, this is not for you and I'm glad you have found something that seems to be working. For those of you with battery oddities, something new to try... See what security protocol your

  • Appletx and hdmi to RCA cable?

    I don't have an HD TV and my input to my TV is an RCA three connector type. Can I connect my Appletv to my tv with a HD to RCA cable?

  • MAKE IP TO URL

    how to make IP into URL...plz suggest

  • Login failed

    Hi, I just created a user by this : BEGIN fnd_user_pkg.CreateUser( x_user_name => 'MYUSER', x_owner => 'CUST', x_unencrypted_password => 'WELLCOM', x_description => 'new_desc2', x_email_address => 'new_email2', x_fax => 'new_fax2'); end; but when con